8
Thoughts on LHCONE/LHCOPN evolution DANTE, DFN,GARR,RENATER CERN, 10-11 February 2014 Presenter: Roberto Sabatino - DANTE

Thoughts on LHCONE/LHCOPN evolution

  • Upload
    erelah

  • View
    24

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Thoughts on LHCONE/LHCOPN evolution. DANTE, DFN,GARR,RENATER CERN, 10-11 February 2014 Presenter: Roberto Sabatino - DANTE. Recap on facts & figures. LHCOPN is a private, closed, infrastructure with primary purpose to provide dedicated connectivity between T0 and T1s - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Thoughts on LHCONE/LHCOPN evolution

Thoughts on LHCONE/LHCOPN

evolutionDANTE, DFN,GARR,RENATERCERN, 10-11 February 2014

Presenter: Roberto Sabatino - DANTE

Page 2: Thoughts on LHCONE/LHCOPN evolution

Recap on facts & figures• LHCOPN is a private, closed, infrastructure with primary purpose to

provide dedicated connectivity between T0 and T1s• 13 T1s connected directly to T0• Capacity used also for T1-T1 traffic, via T0 or additional links, and

transit to T0 via other T1s

• LHCONE: private IP overlays (VRFs) on NRENs, GEANT, ESNet, Internet2 interconnected via Open Exchanges• 8 T1s and 40+ T2s interconnected• Multi-domain routing just like normal IP, but with restrictions on

advertised IP space, with dedicated access links and trans-atlantic links

Page 3: Thoughts on LHCONE/LHCOPN evolution

Changing landscape

• In 2012 when LHCONE started, R&E networks were mostly Nx10Gbps based• Today many are based on, or moving towards, 100Gbps, with connectors at

100Gbps too

• Stronger co-ordination on transatlantic connectivity, compared to pre-2012• Resilient, diverse, bundles for general connectivity and LHCONE connectivity• trials of 100Gbps

• 100Gbps transatlantic operationally/commercially viable in late 2014/early 2015

Page 4: Thoughts on LHCONE/LHCOPN evolution

Current shortcomings

• T1-T1 traffic via T0 constrained. T0-T1 not guaranteed 10Gbps

• T1-T1 transfers suboptimal via LHCOPN• Many T1-T1 need to go via T0 (BNL-NLT1)

• Upgrading OPN and improving resilience costly

• Current transatlantic capacity still somewhat limited• Current use of T.A T1-T0 not flexible, cannot be shared for T1-T2 traffic

Page 5: Thoughts on LHCONE/LHCOPN evolution

Thoughts

• Open up LHCONE policy, to allow T1-T1 traffic• Within regions (GEANT, North America) there is ample capacity to support the

T1-T1 traffic• DFN, GARR, RENATER are able to provide capacity to move T1-T1 traffic from

LHCOPN to LHCONE at short notice• Possibly, use as T0-T1 backup as well

• More flexibility in use of T.A LHC dedicated links • Perform a Intra-Europe T1-T1 trial between KIT, CNAF, IN2P3• Perform a T.A trial over ANA-100G link

Page 6: Thoughts on LHCONE/LHCOPN evolution

From the single T1 point of view (today)

T1

T1CERN

T1

T1LHCONE IP Service (No T1-T1)

LHCOPN Private circuit

LHCONE[R/N]REN

LHCONEGEANT

T0CERN

Page 7: Thoughts on LHCONE/LHCOPN evolution

Possible scenario

T1

LHCONE[R/N]REN

LHCONE IP Service

LHCOPN Private circuit

Double link to local NREN(increased bw and resiliency)

LHCONEGEANT

T0/T1CERN

LHCONE[R/N]REN

T1

Page 8: Thoughts on LHCONE/LHCOPN evolution

Summary

• Validate T1-T1 traffic over LHCONE• Allow T1-T1 traffic over LHCONE• Can be prioritised (and capped) for transatlantic transfers

• Flexible use of LHC-dedicated T.A. T1-T0 links for LHCOPN and LHCONE• T1s, T2s choose how to connect to other sites• LHCOPN (T0, T1)• LHCONE (T1, T2,…)• Dedicated connectivity (lambda, p2p, BoD)