53
FASB Update Nick Cappiello Supervising Project Manager, FASB 1 March 7, 2016

This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

FASB UpdateNick CappielloSupervising Project Manager, FASB

1

March 7, 2016

Page 2: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Expressions of individual views by members of the FASB and staff are encouraged. The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter. Official positions of the FASB on accounting matters are reached only after extensive due process and deliberation.

FASB Staff Disclaimer

2

Page 3: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

• Accounting for Financial Instrumentso Hedgingo Impairment

• Business Combinationso Accounting for Identifiable Intangible

Assets

• Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost

• Disclosure Framework

Topic Summary

3

• Goodwill

• Conceptual Framework

• Government Assistance

• Simplifying the Equity Method of Accounting

• Accounting for Income Taxes EITF Issue 16-A: Restricted Cash

• PCC Agenda Decision No. 15-02: “Applying Variable Interest Entity Guidance to Entities under Common Control”

Page 4: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Accounting for Financial Instruments (AFI): Hedging

4

Page 5: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

“Highly effective”

Nonfinancial gets “thrown out”

Component hedging allowed for financial instruments

Cash flow hedges divided into “effective” and “ineffective” portions

Hedge ineffectiveness reported in earnings

Hedge Accounting – Current GAAP

5

Page 6: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Nonfinancial hedging:- Qualifying threshold of current GAAP will be

retained- Separately recording “ineffectiveness” will be

effectively eliminated - May designate a contractually specified

component linked to an index as the hedged item

Hedged Item Designation

6

Page 7: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

AFI: Impairment

7

Page 8: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Impairment . . . CECL Overview 8

8

Allowance = Cash flows not expected to be collected

Model more forward-looking

Provides enhanced disclosures

Page 9: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Impairment . . . Summary of Board Decisions

9

Loans Debt Securities

Held for Investment CECL Held to Maturity CECL

Held for Sale Lower of cost or market

Available for Sale New creditloss model

Trading FV-NI

Page 10: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Accounting for Identifiable Intangible Assets in a Business Combination

10

Page 11: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Intangibles – Alternatives 11

11

View A – No intangibles

View B – No intangibles except those capable of being sold or licensed

View C – No change to GAAP

Page 12: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Goodwill and Intangibles for Public Business Entities and Not-for-Profit Entities

12

Page 13: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Project Approach

13

Phase 1 • Simplify the impairment test

Phase 2 • Work concurrently with IASB to address any additional concerns

Page 14: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost

14

Page 15: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

• Present service cost with other compensation costs

• Service cost eligible for capitalization

Overview

15

Page 16: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Disclosure Framework

16

Page 17: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Improving the effectiveness of notes requires both:

17

Disclosure Framework: Two Components

Appropriate exercise of discretion by reporting entities when assessing disclosure requirements

Phase II: Entity’s Decision Process

Consistent considerations by the Board in each standard-setting activity

Phase I: Board’s Decision Process

Page 18: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Purpose of notes

General limitations• Relevance• Costs• Some information oriented toward the

future

Information that could be appropriate for inclusion in notes

Considerations for interim reporting

Board’s Decision Process

Issues Addressed in EDComment period ended July 14, 2014

18Copyright 2015 by Financial Accounting Foundation, Norwalk, CT. For non-commercial, educational/academic purposes only.

Page 19: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Effectiveness of notes after applying two discretion criteria Materiality Entity-specific Relevance

Effectiveness of different criteria in removing disclosure that are not decision useful

Constraints of reporting system on entity’s ability to exercise discretion• Audit• Regulatory• Legal

Entity’s Decision Process

Field Study Provided Insights on

19Copyright 2015 by Financial Accounting Foundation, Norwalk, CT. For non-commercial, educational/academic purposes only.

Page 20: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Promote Discretion

20

Changes to the Codification

“Provide to the extent material”

Eliminate language that limits discretion

Add guidance on applying materiality

Page 21: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Promoting Discretion (cont’d)

21

US Supreme Court’s description

Omission not an accounting error

Applied individually and in the aggregate

Quantitative and qualitative

Guidance on Applying Materiality

Page 22: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Promote Discretion (cont’d)

22

Applied individually and in the aggregate

Legal concept

Quantitative and qualitative

Omission not an accounting error

Guidance on Applying Materiality

Page 23: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Fair Value Measurement

23

Disclosures provide information about:• Ways an entity arrives at fair value• The effects on financial statements• Uncertainty in measurement • Measurement change period to

period

Objectives based on proposed framework

Page 24: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Fair Value Measurement - Disclosure Updates

24

“Sensitivity” Information

Possible Changes Forward-looking

Information

Process and Policies

Gains and LossesRollforwards

Page 25: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Defined Benefit Plans – Disclosure review

25

Possible Additions

General characteristics

Interest crediting rate of

cash plansNAV disclosures

Reasons for significant

gains/losses

Page 26: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Defined Benefit Plans – Disclosure review (cont’d)

26

Possible Removals

Amount in AOCI expected to be

recognized

Plan assets expected to be

returned

L3 plan asset rollforward

(nonpublic only)ABO

Page 27: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Income Taxes - Disclosure Review

27

Disaggregation of Indefinitely Reinvested Earnings

Possible Changes to Unremitted Foreign

EarningsDomestic Tax

on Foreign Earnings

Changes in Circumstances

Disaggregation of Income Before

Tax

Page 28: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Income Taxes - Disclosure Review (cont’d)

28

Change in next 12 months

Possible Changes to Unrecognized Tax Benefits

Enhance tabular reconciliation

Page 29: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Income Taxes - Disclosure Review (cont’d)

29

Explanation of valuation allowance

Possible Changes to Other Income Tax Disclosures

Carryforwards

Domestic/foreign tax paid

Rate reconciliation

Change in tax law

Page 30: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Inventory Disclosures

30

Scope and objectives

• Use decision questions from proposed framework to determine potential disclosures

• Evaluate alternatives for private companies based on PCDMF

Possible changes

• Incorporate SEC / AICPA guidance into GAAP

• Additional cost/measurement basis disclosures

• Disclosures of certain rights and obligations• Disclosures around changes in

value/quality/utility

Next steps• Small group meetings with FASB• Outreach with PCC members• User and preparer outreach

Page 31: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Defined Benefit Plans

Fair Value Measurement

Income Taxes

Inventory

31

Exposure Drafts- Income Taxes- Inventory

Redeliberate Proposed Concepts in the Disclosure Framework

Redeliberate Entity’s Decision Process

Roundtable in 2nd half of 2016

Next Steps

Page 32: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Conceptual Framework

32

Page 33: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Not a new conceptual framework- Try to address deficiencies- Try to clarify and improve understanding- Make amendments that experience in application have

suggested are necessary

Structure of the joint project was the same as the structure of the FASB and IASB Frameworks

Project Objective

33

Page 34: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Joint financial statement presentation

Address deficiencies in Concept Statement 5 related to presentation- How should individual items be included in line items?- How should line items be grouped?

Research project on performance reporting added in July 2014

Overview of Past and Current Presentation Efforts

34

Page 35: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Concept 1: Information should be combined into reasonably homogeneous groups

Concept 2: The association between different items that changed should be made apparent

Concepts

35

Page 36: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Measurement – What does it mean?

Does measurement apply to revenues, expenses, gains, losses, or to cash flows?

For assets and liabilities:- Is systematic allocation measurement?- Is accrual of interest measurement?- Is adjusting to a market price measurement?- Is adjusting to a (discounted or undiscounted) amount of

estimated cash flows measurement?

Measurement

36

Page 37: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

What is a value?- Value to whom?- Is there an inherent worth that is (a) unchanging except for

consumption or deterioration and (b) independent of market changes?

What is a price? How is it different from value?

What is a cost? How is it different from a price or a value?

Value, cost, and price

37

Page 38: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Government Assistance Disclosures

38

Page 39: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

92

Enable user to access:

Nature of assistance and related accounting policies

Significant terms/conditions of the agreement

Effect on organization’s financial statements

Assistance not recognized in the financial statements, but may have an effect on the financial statements in future periods

Objectives

Page 40: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Annual Disclosures

Nature of the assistance and the related accounting policies

Reflect a description of how the policies relate to nature of the agreements

Should include:- Nature of the assistance- Accounting policy- Presentation location

40

Page 41: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Annual Disclosures Amounts not recognized in company’s financial statements, but

that affect cash flows in current period

Significant terms and conditions of the agreement, including:- The duration/period of the contract, the tax rate, or interest rate- Commitments made by both the reporting entity and the

government - Provisions, if any, for recapturing government assistance,

including the conditions under which recapture is allowed- Other contingencies

41

Page 42: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Simplifying the Equity Method of Accounting

42

Page 43: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Current equity accounting GAAP requires: - Difference between cost and equity- Determine the FV in the same manner as Business

Combinations- Presented as a single line item

Subsequent measurement requires recognition of proportionate share of: - Investee income/loss- Amortization or accretion of basis difference, - Other-than-temporary impairment

Background

43

Page 44: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Costly and complex:- The information may be difficult to obtain- Increased cost when 3rd-party valuations are necessary- Ongoing tracking is time consuming

Generally not decision useful

Issues

44

Page 45: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Remove concept

Transition method: modified prospective- Freeze any basis and apply the new guidance.

Transition disclosures

Board Decision - Basis

45

Page 46: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Accounting for Income TaxesSimplification Initiative Project

46

Page 47: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes

47

Current GAAP requirement: Presented in balance sheet as:

- Current deferred tax asset and liability- Noncurrent deferred tax asset and liability

Classification:- Based on related asset or liability- Generally not based on when temporary differences will reverse

Proposed GAAP:

Classify all deferred tax asset and liability as noncurrent

Page 48: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Intra-Entity Asset Transfers

48

Current GAAP requirement: Defer the recognition until the assets have been sold to an outside

third party

Exception for comprehensive recognition of income taxes

Proposed GAAP:

Eliminate the exception

Require recognition when the transfer occurs

Page 49: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

EITF Issue 16-A, “Restricted Cash”

49

Page 50: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Overview

50

• Significant diversity in practice exists with respect to the classification of certain cash receipts and payments

• This diversity may exist because of a lack of specific accounting guidance

Page 51: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Project topics

51

Three subissues being examined:1. Definition of restricted cash2. Classification of changes in restricted cash3. Presentation of cash payments and cash receipts that directly affect restricted cash

Page 52: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

PCC Agenda Decision No. 15-02: “Applying Variable Interest Entity Guidance to Entities under Common Control”

52

Page 53: This Is What A Title Slide With Multiple Heads Looks Like

Overview

53

Diversity in practice exists in application of the VIE consolidation guidance to entities under common control