Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/acceptedfor publication in the following source:
Hu, Wenbiao, Huang, Xiaodong, Milinovich, Gabriel, Barr, Ian, & Bam-brick, Hilary(2018)Comparison of epidemical features of seasonal influenza across differentclimatic zones in Australia.Virology and Mycology, 7, p. 150.
This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/133914/
c© Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters
This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under aCreative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use andthat permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu-ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then referto the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog-nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe thatthis work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected]
License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No DerivativeWorks 4.0
Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record(i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub-mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) canbe identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear-ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3307714
Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for The Lancet
Planetary Health
Manuscript Draft
Manuscript Number:
Title: Comparison of epidemical features of seasonal influenza across
different climatic zones in Australia
Article Type: Article (Original Research)
Keywords: Seasonal influenza epidemics, transmission rate, climatic zone,
epidemic duration, epidemic peak timing
Corresponding Author: Professor Wenbiao Hu,
Corresponding Author's Institution: Queensland University of Technology,
Brisbane, Australia
First Author: Wenbiao Hu
Order of Authors: Wenbiao Hu; Xiaodong Huang; Gabriel Milinovich; Ian
Barr; Hilary Bambrick
Manuscript Region of Origin: AUSTRALIA
Abstract: Background: Seasonal influenza epidemic patterns have been
highly influenced by weather and usually vary by tropical, subtropical
and temperate climates. Few studies investigate the features of seasonal
influenza in different age groups among geo-climatic regions according to
a specific climatic condition.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the differences in the epidemical
features of influenza A and B among six climatic zones in three age
groups (<15, 15-64 and 65+ years) in Australia.
Methods: National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS) data on
weekly laboratory-confirmed cases of influenza A and B at a postcode
level were collected from the Australian Government Department of Health
between 1st January 2011 and 31st December 2013. Spatial and temporal
descriptive analyses and Dunnett- Tukey-Kramer (DTK) pairwise multiple
comparison tests were used to investigate the differences in seasonal
patterns, durations, peak timings and epidemic magnitude for influenza A
and B, stratified by the six climatic zones and age group. Bayesian
space-time models based on a spatial conditional autoregressive (CAR)
model combined with a susceptible, infectious and removed (SIR) model was
used to estimate transmission rates to explore differences in evolution
of influenza A and B epidemics.
Results: There were significant differences in mean weekly notification
rates of influenza A and B among the six climatic zones in the 0-14 and
15-64 age groups. Mean weekly notification rates were more likely to be
higher in the areas with a warm winter or a mild winter than in the area
with relatively colder winter. The ≥65 age group showed less spatial
variation in mean weekly notification rates of influenza A and B among
the six climatic zones. Mean duration, peak timing and transmission rates
of influenza A and B epidemics did not display synchronicity between
either the three age groups or the six climatic zones. The magnitude of
the linear growth and decay rates of mean weekly transmission rates
varied by different climatic zones and age groups.
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
Conclusion: This study suggests that the epidemic features of influenza A
and B vary between geo-climatic regions and age groups. Our findings
provide valuable insight for public health authorities to adjust
prevention and control strategies of seasonal influenza for specific age
groups in specific climatic regions in Australia.
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
1
Comparison of epidemical features of seasonal influenza across different
climatic zones in Australia
Wenbiao Hu1*
, Xiaodong Huang2, Gabriel Milinovich
1, Ian Barr
3 and Hilary Bambrick
1
1School of Public Health and Social Work, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation,
Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
2School of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland
University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
3World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on
Influenza, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
*Corresponding author: Dr. Wenbiao Hu, School of Public Health and Social Work, Institute
of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology. Telephone:
+61-7-3138 5742; Email: [email protected]
Running title: Epidemical features of seasonal influenza across different climatic zones
Word count: 367 for abstract, 5,370 for text, 4 tables, 5 figures, 31 references
Manuscript
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
2
Abstract
Background: Seasonal influenza epidemic patterns have been highly influenced by weather
and usually vary by tropical, subtropical and temperate climates. Few studies investigate the
features of seasonal influenza in different age groups among geo-climatic regions according
to a specific climatic condition.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the differences in the epidemical features of influenza
A and B among six climatic zones in three age groups (<15, 15-64 and 65+ years) in
Australia.
Methods: National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS) data on weekly
laboratory-confirmed cases of influenza A and B at a postcode level were collected from the
Australian Government Department of Health between 1st January 2011 and 31
st December
2013. Spatial and temporal descriptive analyses and Dunnett- Tukey-Kramer (DTK) pairwise
multiple comparison tests were used to investigate the differences in seasonal patterns,
durations, peak timings and epidemic magnitude for influenza A and B, stratified by the six
climatic zones and age group. Bayesian space-time models based on a spatial conditional
autoregressive (CAR) model combined with a susceptible, infectious and removed (SIR)
model was used to estimate transmission rates to explore differences in evolution of influenza
A and B epidemics.
Results: There were significant differences in mean weekly notification rates of influenza A
and B among the six climatic zones in the 0-14 and 15-64 age groups. Mean weekly
notification rates were more likely to be higher in the areas with a warm winter or a mild
winter than in the area with relatively colder winter. The ≥65 age group showed less spatial
variation in mean weekly notification rates of influenza A and B among the six climatic
zones. Mean duration, peak timing and transmission rates of influenza A and B epidemics did
not display synchronicity between either the three age groups or the six climatic zones. The
magnitude of the linear growth and decay rates of mean weekly transmission rates varied by
different climatic zones and age groups.
Conclusion: This study suggests that the epidemic features of influenza A and B vary
between geo-climatic regions and age groups. Our findings provide valuable insight for
public health authorities to adjust prevention and control strategies of seasonal influenza for
specific age groups in specific climatic regions in Australia.
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
3
Keywords: Seasonal influenza epidemics, transmission rate, climatic zone, epidemic
duration, epidemic peak timing.
Introduction
Seasonal influenza is an acute viral infection that causes substantial morbidity and mortality.
Annually, it is estimated that seasonal influenza results in 250,000–500,000 deaths globally,
with a particularly heavy burden on very young children and elderly people (WHO, 2016).
The influenza viruse is classified into 4 types, denoted A, B, C and D. Influenza viruses A
and B commonly circulate and outbreaks of these types occur throughout the world; the virus
has a propensity for antigenic drift and shift and as such, is considered a serious and constant
global public health problem (WHO, 2016), while influenza C and D cause little human
disease.
The annual temporal patterns of seasonal influenza are strongly associated with weather
fluctuation in temperate regions (J. Tamerius et al., 2011; J. D. Tamerius et al., 2013),
whereas the temporal patterns in tropical and subtropical regions are less well defined
(Bloom-Feshbach et al., 2013; Deyle, Maher, Hernandez, Basu, & Sugihara, 2016; Moura,
2010; J. D. Tamerius et al., 2013; WHO, 2016). “Flu season”, the period of most epidemic
activity of seasonal influenza, typically occurs from November to March in the northern
hemisphere and from May to September in the southern hemisphere (Lone Simonsen, 1999).
Within temperate regions, research has demonstrated cold temperature and low humidity
facilitate influenza transmission (Bloom-Feshbach et al., 2013; A. C. Lowen & Steel, 2014;
Shaman, Pitzer, Viboud, Grenfell, & Lipsitch, 2010; J. D. Tamerius et al., 2013). Within
tropical and subtropical regions, increased transmission is associated with humid-rainy
conditions (Shaman, Goldstein, & Lipsitch, 2010; J. Tamerius et al., 2011). Significant
relationships have also been demonstrated between influenza epidemics and latitudinal
variations (Bloom-Feshbach et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2013). However, climatic conditions may
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
4
vary significantly across a single latitude, even in same traditional climatic zone. For example,
small-scale local climate conditions are affected by the local ecosystem factors including
altitude, vegetation (desert/grassland/forest) and locality (coastal/inland). Hence, the
associations between influenza epidemics and sole latitude gradients may not fully mirror the
characteristics of seasonal influenza epidemics.
Most studies to date have focused on analysis of the epidemic patterns of seasonal influenza
among tropical, subtropical and temperate areas only (Deyle et al., 2016; Moura, Perdigão, &
Siqueira, 2009; Saha et al., 2014; J. Tamerius et al., 2011). Moreover, the spatial variation in
seasonality of influenza A and B (Yu et al., 2013) and the effects of weather conditions on
different age groups (Huang, Mengersen, Milinovich, & Hu, 2017) have been reported. To
our knowledge, few studies have explored the characteristics of the epidemics of seasonal
influenza A and B among different age groups in different climatic zones, classified
according to temperature and humidity. As such, uncertainties and limitations still exist in
fully understanding of seasonal influenza characteristics in different climatic zones and age
groups. The aim of this study was to characterize influenza A and B epidemics across a
diverse set of geo-climatic conditions and age groups (0-14, 15-64 and 65+ years of age). The
establishment of such features of influenza outbreaks will valuable information to assist in
future vaccination programs and to guide influenza prevention and control in people of
different age groups in specific geo-climatic zones.
Materials and Methods
Study site and data collection
Australia is in the southern hemisphere and surrounded by the Indian and Pacific oceans.
Climates significantly vary across the continent due to its large land size and wide variety of
landscapes. The data on weekly laboratory-confirmed cases of influenza A and B at a
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
5
postcode level, reported to the NNDSS, were collected from the Australian Government
Department of Health between 1st
January 2011 and 31st December 2013. The population size
of age groups at each postal area was based on the 2011 Census data in Australia (Australian
Bureau of Statistics, 2013).
The six climatic zones were classified according temperature and humidity data collected
over the period 1961 to 1990 by the Bureau of Meteorology (Australian Government Bureau
of Meteorology, 2016b). The six climatic zones included: 1) hot humid summer (HHS) zone
including equatorial, tropical and some parts of subtropical areas; 2) warm humid summer
(WHS) zone including some parts of subtropical areas; 3) hot dry summer and mild winter
(HDMW) zone including most desert areas; 4) hot dry summer and cold winter (HDCW)
zone including grassland and some parts of desert areas; 5) warm summer and cool winter
(WSCW) zone located in a warm temperate area; and 6) mild warm summer and cold winter
(MSCW) zone including a cool temperate area. The numbers of postal locations were 168,
239, 39, 584, 1926 and 187 in HHS, WHS, HDMW, HDCW, WSCW and MSCW zones,
respectively.
Statistical analysis and modelling
Weekly influenza data were collected by each postal location and were categorized into three
age groups (0-14, 15-64 and 65+ years) over 157 consecutive weeks from 1st January 2011 to
31st December 2013 across the six climatic zones. Weather conditions for a postal zone were
assumed to be as per the climatic zone described by the Bureau of Meteorology. Hence, local
weather factors were not involved in the analysis in the study.
To detect spatial variations in the epidemics of influenza A and B across Australia, we
mapped the spatial distributions of overall mean weekly notification rates by each postal
location for the three age groups over the study period. Heatmaps were used to display the
seasonal patterns of influenza A and B epidemics. Using ANOVA and Dunnett-Tukey-
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
6
Kramer (DTK) Pairwise Multiple Comparison Test significant differences in mean weekly
influenza notification rates among the six climatic zones in each age group were determined.
Epidemic duration for each climatic zone was defined as the number of weeks in the calendar
year in which influenza cases exceeded 2.5% of the annual number of influenza cases in each
climatic zone. We also tested a 5% epidemic threshold to test the sensitivity of the epidemic
durations, but 2.5% threshold appeared to show a reliable definition of epidemic period in the
study. Annual peak timing of influenza epidemics was defined as the week with the highest
overall mean weekly notification rate at each climatic zone in each age group in each year.
Bayesian space-time models based on a spatial conditional autoregressive (CAR) model
(Besag, York, & Mollie, 1991) and a susceptible, infectious and removed (SIR) model were
used to examine the dynamic transmission rates of both influenza A and B across the six
climatic zones in each age group over the study period, except for the ≥ 65 age group for
influenza B owing to very small weekly number of influenza B counts across postal locations
over the study period.
Let yij be observed weekly age-specific laboratory-confirmed cases of influenza A and B at
postal location i under a climatic zone and in week j, (i=2513, j=157). A discrete form SIR
model for fraction of susceptibles in a local age-specific population at postal location i and in
week (j+1) is expressed as , where S and I denote numbers in the age-
specific susceptible and infected populations, respectively. We assumed that the number of
susceptibles in the first week was Si1 = 65% of population size for each postal location
(Dorigatti, Cauchemez, & Ferguson, 2013; He, Dushoff, Eftimie, & Earn, 2013). Let Iij be
defined as a Poisson distribution, )(~ ijij PoisI . The expected count ij is given by a function
of the number of infected cases in week (j-1) and the susceptible population size in week j
(Huang et al., 2016; Lawson & Song, 2010):
(1)
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
7
(2)
where βij is weekly transmission rate of influenza at location i and in week j; b0 is the
intercept for the model which represents the log-transformed baseline transmission rate
across all postal locations; b1, b2, b3 and b4 are the regression coefficients for the harmonic
terms to describe the seasonal patterns of the influenza A and B; tij is a random effect to take
account of spatiotemporal variation in transmission rate at each postal location; random effect
ui captures the effect of unmeasured or unobserved factors with spatial pattern using a CAR
model which is built as a function of its first-order neighbourhood; random effect vi
corresponds to geographically unstructured heterogeneity in transmission rate that captures
measurement error or micro-scale variation. Normally distributions were adopted for all
terms ui, νi and tij. The Bayesian analysis was performed using WinBUGS software version
1.4. Posterior distributions for βij were obtained through Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)
sampling. Convergence was assessed by checking the trace plots for the parameters. We ran
15,000 MCMC iterations and discarded the first 3,000 MCMC iterations as burn-in.
Finally, we used linear regression models to roughly capture the trends of the estimated
transmission rates from starting influenza activity month to peak month or from peak month
to off peak season in order to investigate the temporal evolutions of seasonal epidemics of
influenza A and B. The slope coefficients αi that were estimated from linear regression
models (i.e. βij = αi × (week)j+bi) were used to compare the magnitudes of the linear growth
rates (from starting influenza activity in May to peak month in August) and the linear decay
rates (from September to off-peak season in December) for influenza A and B transmission
among the six climatic zones in each climatic zone.
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
8
Results
1. Epidemics of influenza A and B at a nationwide level
There was a statistically significant difference in overall means of weekly notification rates
between influenza A (mean=2.11 per 100,000) and influenza B (mean=0.9 per 100,000)
(ANOVA test, p<0.001) during the study period in Australia. The overall mean weekly
notification rates of influenza A for each age group were also significantly greater than those
of influenza B in the respective 0-14 (p<0.0149), 15-64 (p<0.001) and ≥65 (p<0.0219) age
groups. Influenza A and B activities exhibited similar seasonal patterns during the study
period, which the peak timings for the highest overall monthly notification rates of both
influenza A and B occurred in winter (August), except for influenza A in July in 2012. Figure
2 shows the spatial distributions of mean weekly notification rates by a postcode level across
Australia. There were substantial spatial variations in the mean weekly notification rates of
influenza A in the three age groups, while large spatial variation only presented in the 0-14
age group for influenza B.
[Figure 1 about here]
2. Influenza Epidemic Characteristics in the six climatic zones
2.1 Magnitude of influenza Epidemics
Table 1 shows the summary of observed mean weekly notification rates of influenza A and B
by a postcode level in the six climatic zones. In the 0-14 age group, the highest averages of
mean weekly notification rates were observed in WHS zone for influenza A (mean = 4.91 per
100,000 population) and in HDMW zone for influenza B (mean = 3.25 per 100,000
population), while the smallest averages of mean weekly notification rates were found in
MSCW zone for both influenza A (mean=1.9 per 100,000 population) and B (mean=0.78 per
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
9
100,000 population). In the 15-64 age group, the highest averages of mean weekly
notification rates presented in HDMW zone for both influenza A (mean=3.29 per 100,000
population) and B (mean=1.21 per 100,000 population), followed by HHS zone for both
influenza A (mean=3.0 per 100,000 population) and B (mean=1.1 per 100,000 population),
while the smallest averages of mean weekly notification rates occurred in MSCW zone for
both influenza A (mean=1.44 per 100,000 population) and B (mean=0.42 per 100,000
population). In the ≥65 age group, the highest averages of mean weekly notification rates
presented in HHS zone for influenza A (mean=3.14 per 100,000 population) and in MSCW
zone for influenza B (mean=0.79 per 100,000 population). The smallest averages of mean
weekly notification rates exhibited in HDMW zone for influenza A (mean=1.58 per 100,000
population) and B (mean=0.41 per 100,000 population).
The DTK test indicated that there were statistically significant differences in mean weekly
notification rates of influenza A and B between different climatic zones in each age group,
except for influenza B in the ≥ 65 age group (Figure 3). For example, in the 0-14 age group,
mean weekly notification rates of influenza A and B were significantly greater in WHS zone
than in HDCW, WSCW and MSCW zones, but significantly smaller in MSCW zone than in
HHS and WSCW zones. Mean weekly notification rates were significantly greater in WHS
zone than in HDMW zone for influenza A and in HDCW zone than in MSCW zone for
influenza B. There were no differences in means of weekly notification rates between any
other pairs of climatic zones. In the 15-64 age group, mean weekly notification rates of
influenza A and B were significantly smaller in MSCW zone than in HHS, WHS and HDCW
zones. In the ≥ 65 age group, mean weekly notification rate of influenza A was only
significantly greater in WHS zone than in WSCW zone. There were no significant difference
in mean of weekly notification rates of influenza B among the six climatic zones.
[Table 1 about here]
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
10
[Figure 2 about here]
2.2 Seasonal pattern
Heatmaps show the temporal patterns of mean weekly notification rates of influenza A and B
during the study period (Figure 4). Although influenza A and B activities concentrated in
winter, the heatmaps depicted a diversity of seasonal patterns among the six climatic zones in
each age group. HHS was likely to experience a semi-annual and annual influenza patterns
for influenza A and B in the three age groups, particularly for influenza A. There were no
clear annual seasonal patterns in HDMW zone for either influenza A or B for the 15-64 and ≥
65 age groups. WHS, HDCW, WSCW and MSCW zones were more likely to present clear
annual seasonal patterns for influenza A and B in the three age groups.
[Figure 3 about here]
2.3 Epidemic duration and peak timing
Table 2 shows the epidemic durations of each year using a 2.5% epidemic threshold in each
climatic zone for each age group. There were large variations in epidemic durations between
the three age groups in the six climatic zones. In the 0-14 age group, the longest mean
durations were observed in HHS zone for influenza A (mean=28 weeks) and influenza B
(mean=27.7 weeks), while the smallest mean duration was 13 weeks (range 10 to 16 weeks)
for influenza A in WSCW zone and 11.7 weeks (range 10 to14 weeks) for influenza B in
WHS zone. In the 15-64 age group, the longest mean duration was found in HHS zone for
influenza A (mean=28 weeks) and in HDMW zone for influenza B (mean=37 weeks), while
the smallest mean duration was 10.7 weeks in WHS zone for influenza A and 13.7 weeks in
WSCW zone for influenza B. In the ≥ 65 age group, the longest mean duration presented in
HDMW zone for influenza A (mean=39.3 weeks) and in HHS zone for influenza B
(mean=41.3 weeks), while the smallest mean duration occurred in WSCW zone with an
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
11
average of 15.3 weeks for influenza A and in WSCW zone with an average of 17.3 weeks for
influenza B. Here, influenza B in HDMW zone (mean=13 weeks) was omitted from
comparison of the smallest mean duration due to missing data in 2013.
Table 3 shows the annual peak timings of influenza A and B epidemics in each year among
the six climatic zones in each age group. Although 77.6% of the peak mean weekly
notification rates of influenza A and B were observed in winter months between the middle
of June and the end of August among the six climatic zones in the three age groups during the
three years, the peak weeks of each year were not well synchronized. For example, the annual
peak timings for influenza A and B in HHS zone were found across four seasons in the three
age groups, particularly in 2013.
[Tables 2 and 3 about here]
2.4 Transmission Rate
Table 4 shows the averages of posterior mean weekly transmission rates of influenza A and B
in each climatic zone and each age group during the study period. There were significant
differences in means of estimated weekly transmission rates for influenza A and B among the
six climatic zones in each age groups (ANOVA test: p<0.001). In the 0-14 age group, the
highest means of estimated weekly transmission rates for both influenza A and B exhibited in
WHS zone, while the lowest averages of estimated weekly transmission rates for both
influenza A and B were found in MSCW zone. In the 15-64 age group, the highest averages
of estimated weekly transmission rates for both influenza A and B appeared in HDMW zone,
while the lowest means of estimated weekly transmission rates for both influenza A and B
presented in MSCW zone. In the ≥65 age group, the highest averages of estimated weekly
influenza A transmission rates was found in WHS and HHS zones, while the lowest mean of
estimated weekly influenza A transmission rate showed in HDMW zone.
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
12
[Table 4 about here]
2.5 Linear growth and decay of transmission rate
The linear regression models in Figures 5 and 6 demonstrated marked variations in the linear
growth and decay rates of mean estimated weekly transmission rates for influenza A and B
among the six climatic zones in each age group. For the linear growth rates from May to
August in Figure 5, in the 0-14 age group, the highest linear growth rates were found in WHS
zone for both influenza A (α = 0.0037, p=0.001) and B (α = 0.0029, p<0.001), while the
lowest linear growth rates for mean weekly transmission rates presented in MSCW for both
influenza A (α =0.0012, p=0.166) and B (α =0.0006, p<0.001), followed by HHS zone for
influenza A (α=0.0017, p=0.03) and B (α=0.0007, p=0.005). In the 15-64 age group, the
highest linear growth rates for mean weekly transmission rates showed in HDMW zone for
both influenza A (α=0.0022, p=0.01) and B (α=0.001, p=0.046), while the lowest linear
growth rates for mean weekly transmission rates were founded in MSCW zone for both
influenza A (α=0.001, p=0.004) and B (α=0.0004, p<0.001). In the ≥65 age group, influenza
A presented the highest linear growth rates for mean weekly transmission rates in WHS zone
(α=0.0027, p<0.001), followed by HHS (α=0.0026, p<0.001), while HDMW zone showed the
lowest linear growth rate (α=0.0004, p=0.143).
For the linear decay rates of mean estimated weekly transmission rates from September to
December in Figure 6, in the 0-14 age group, the highest linear decay rates occurred in
HDMW zone for both influenza A (α = -0.0022, p=0.007) and B (α =-0.0014, p<0.001),
while the lowest linear decay rates were found in MSCW zone for influenza A (α =-0.0003,
p<0.001) and in HDMW zone for influenza B (α =-0.0003, p=0.022). In the 15-64 age group,
the highest linear decay rates presented in HDMW zone for influenza A (α=-0.0011, p=0.009)
and in WHS zone for influenza B (α=-0.0007, p<0.001), while the lowest linear decay rates
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
13
were found in MSCW zone for influenza A (α=-0.0002, p<0.001), and in HHS (α=-0.0002,
p<0.001) and MSCW (α=-0.0002, p=0.009) zones for influenza B. In the ≥65 age group,
influenza A showed the highest linear decay rates for mean weekly transmission rate in WHS
zone (α=-0.001, p=0.001), followed by HHS (α=-0.0009, p=0.005) and HDCW (α=-0.0008,
p<0.001), while the lowest linear decay rates were found in HDMW (α=-0.0001, p=0.664)
and MSCW (α=-0.0004, p=0.106) zones.
[Figures 4 and 5 about here]
Discussion
Our study demonstrated significant differences in epidemiological features of influenza A
and B outbreaks when population were stratified by climatic zones and age group.
Statistically significant differences in mean weekly notification rates for both influenza A and
B were observed between the six climatic zones in each age group (Figure 2). It is notable
that the 0-14 and 15-64 age groups exhibited relatively higher mean weekly notification rates
of influenza A and B in WHS zone compared with HDCW, WSCW and MSCW zones. Mean
weekly notification rates of influenza A and B in the 0-14 and 15-64 age groups were
significantly smaller in MSCW zone than in HHS zone and in HDCW zone except for
influenza A in the 0-14 age group and in WSCW zone excluding influenza A in the 15-64 age
group. Moreover, WHS zone had a significantly higher mean weekly notification rate of
influenza A than that in WSCW zone in the ≥65 age group. In Australia, WSCW and MSCW
zones are categorized as temperate climate regions. WSCW zone has a warm summer and a
cool winter, while MSCW zone is a relative colder region with a mild/warm summer and a
cold winter in Australia. HHS zone includes equatorial, tropical and subtropical regions and
WHS may only include subtropical region. HHS typically experiences a hot humid summer
and a wet-dry climate while WHS has a warm humid summer and no dry season. HDMW
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
14
zone has a hot dry summer and a mild winter due to mostly desert environmental. HDCW
experiences a dry summer and cold winter zone with some parts of desert and grassland
environmental condition (Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology, 2016a, 2016b). As
stated above, we found that the climatic zones with a warm winter or a mild winter were
more likely to have higher influenza notification rates than relatively colder regions, such as
MSCW zone. Taken together, we hypothesised that people may be easily infected by
influenza virus due to ignoring themselves keeping warm or staying indoors in a warm winter,
which may induce a human behaviour that increase the notification rates in these areas.
Interestingly, there were no spatial variations in mean weekly notification rates of influenza
A and B in the ≥65 age group among the six climatic zones, with the exception of the WHS
zone for influenza A. This result suggests the intensity of influenza epidemics in the ≥65 age
group may not vary significantly geographically, as has previously been reported (Huang et
al., 2017). The Australian National Immunisation Program offers free influenza vaccination
to individuals aged 65+ years (Australian Government Department of Health, 2015), with a
73% of seasonal influenza vaccine uptake rate in this age group (National Centre for
Immunisation Research & Surveillance, 2017). This could help elderly people to battle
against influenza virus infection due to an increase in their anti-influenza antibody titres
(Bernstein et al., 1999; Osterholm, Kelley, Sommer, & Belongia, 2012).
This study found the HHS zone to present semi-annual and annual epidemic patterns. The
WHS, HDCW, WSCW and MSCW zones were more likely to have annual influenza season
for influenza A and B in the three age groups, which is consistent with the global circulation
of seasonal influenza activity that there are two distinct influenza seasons in some of tropical
and subtropical regions and one influenza season in temperate region reported by previous
studies (Azziz Baumgartner et al., 2012; Soebiyanto, Adimi, & Kiang, 2010; Yazdanbakhsh
& Kremsner, 2009; Yu et al., 2013). The epidemic season of influenza could occur therefore
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
15
earlier in HHS zones than in other climatic zones due to experiencing two distinct influenza
seasons. Although WHS zone is classified as subtropical area with no dry season, only
annual influenza season occurred in WHS zone for influenza A and B in the three age groups.
Moreover, it was striking that HDMW with a desert environment presented more complex
and sporadic inter-seasonal sustained sporadic patterns of influenza A and B activity. A
previous study in Maricopa County, Arizona which has a desert climate showed a pattern of
two distinct influenza seasons yearly (Soebiyanto et al., 2010). Our results suggest that the
epidemic patterns of seasonal influenza varied not only in the traditional climatic zones, but
also in small geo-climatic regions within the same traditional climatic zones. The different
seasonal influenza patterns might be used to guide public health authorities to adjust timing
of influenza vaccination and prevention strategies in some specific areas.
Our study demonstrated that mean durations and peak timings of influenza A and B
epidemics are not well synchronized in the three age groups or in the six climatic zones. HHS
and HDMW zones were more likely to exhibit longer mean epidemic durations for influenza
A and B, regardless of age, excluding the ≥ 65 age group in HDMW zone for influenza B. It
would be expected that the complex seasonal patterns in HHS and HDMW zones could
extend their epidemic durations. In contrast, relatively shorter mean annual epidemic
durations occurred in WHS and WSCW zones for the 0-14 age group and in WHS and
MSCW zones for the 15-64 age group and in WSCW zone for the ≥ 65 age group for
influenza A, and in WHS zone for the 0-14 age group and in WHS and WSCW zones for the
15-64 age group and in HDMW and WSCW zones for the ≥65 age group for influenza B.
The epidemic durations of influenza A and B in WHS zone in the six climatic zones were
more likely to be relatively short in the 0-14 and 15-64 age groups, suggesting that influenza
activity may not last long in warmer regions with one annual influenza season.
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
16
Although WSCW and MSCW zones were categorised as temperate zones, MSCW zone had
relatively longer mean annual epidemic durations among the two zones, except for influenza
A in the 15-64 age group. We suggested that cold-temperate regions might have long-lasting
influenza activity compared with mild-temperate regions. Importantly, although the ≥65 age
group had a high seasonal influenza vaccine uptake rate, our study found that the ≥65 age
group had relatively longer mean epidemic durations for influenza A and B compared with
the respective climatic zones in the 0-14 and 15-64 age groups. It is commonly known that
individuals ≥65 years of age are more susceptible due to reduced immunity and increased
prevalence of chronic diseases (DiazGranados et al., 2014; McElhaney et al., 2013). Despite
existing variations in the peak timings of influenza A and B epidemics among the six climatic
zones most of the peak timings occurred in winter. HHS and HDMW zones presented more
diverse ranges of annual peak timings due to their complex seasonal patterns, particularly for
influenza A in the ≥65 age group, in which peak timings sometimes occurred in the early
autumn and summer or the end of summer and spring. The different epidemic durations and
peak timings could help public health authorities to make more practical and flexible control
strategies (e.g. medical supplies allocation and timing of interventions) for seasonal influenza
according to specific areas.
Bayesian space-time models revealed the differences in means of estimated weekly
transmission rates of influenza A and B among the six climatic zones in each age group.
MSCW zone showed relatively smaller averages of posterior mean weekly transmission rates
of influenza A and B in the 0-14 and 15-64 age groups, while HHS and WHS zones were
likely to present relatively higher averages of posterior mean weekly transmission rates of
influenza A in the three age groups and influenza B in WHS zone for in the 0-14 age group. It
is noted that although low temperatures was positively associated with influenza transmission
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
17
in temperate regions (J. D. Tamerius et al., 2013), the MSCW zone, with a cold winter in
Australia, presented relatively lower averages of posterior mean weekly transmission rates in
the study. By contrast, the warm zones, such as the HHS, WHS and HDMW zones, exhibited
relatively higher averages of posterior mean weekly transmission rates for influenza A and B.
A previous study proposed that increased temperature or humidity leads to enhanced
efficiency of influenza transmission by a contact in a warm region, and supposed that the
routes of influenza infection were primarily through by aerosol transmission in temperate
regions and by direct or indirect contact in tropical regions (A. Lowen & Palese, 2009). If this
hypothesis is true, we suggest that influenza prevention and control interventions may need to
be implemented year-round in warm regions, and that health agencies may need to focus
further on public education of influenza transmission routes, as well as personal hygiene.
Our most interesting findings were that the temporal evolutions of influenza A and B
epidemics were not well synchronized among the six climatic zones in each age group. The
magnitudes of the linear growth and decay rates of overall posterior mean weekly
transmission rates varied by different climatic zones and age groups. WHS and HDMW
zones tended to have relatively higher linear growth and decay rates for both influenza A and
B in the 0-14 and 15-64 age groups, except for the linear decay rate for influenza B in
HDMW zone in 0-14 age group. Averages of posterior mean weekly transmission rates of
both influenza A and B were more likely to increase (from starting influenza season (May) to
peak month (August)) and decrease (from September to December) linearly slowly in cold
regions (i.e. MSCW) compared to other climatic zones in the 0-14 and 15-64 age groups,
excluding the decay rate of influenza B in the 0-14 age group. Less geographic variations in
the linear growth and decay rates among the six climatic zones in the 15-64 age group
suggested that the temporal evolutions of influenza A and B epidemics were likely to be
synchronous than the other age groups. Moreover, although HHS was likely to have a semi-
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
18
annual pattern of influenza activity, the magnitudes of the growth rates for influenza A and B
showed a relatively modest increase in weekly transmission rates in HHS zone compared to
the rest climatic zones in the 0-14 and 15-64 age groups. Finally, the findings indicated that
the linear growth rates of influenza A were relatively high in HHS and MSCW zones in the
≥65 age group compared to other two age groups, while their linear decay rates were
relatively fast. Overall, our study is likely to identify the differences in the temporal
evolutions of influenza A and B epidemics in different age groups and climatic zones. This
result may translate into timing of influenza control and resource allocation.
The limitations of the study should be acknowledged. Firstly, the use of laboratory-confirmed
notification data tends to underestimate actual case numbers as it only includes a proportion
of the total cases of influenza occurring in the community, that is, only those cases for which
health care was sought, a test conducted and a diagnosis made, followed by a notification to
health authorities. Although this might have led to underestimating the risk of influenza A
and B epidemics, the study should reasonably mirror the relative magnitudes of influenza A
and B epidemics due to a strong positive linear relationship between the number of the
laboratory-confirmed cases and the number of infected cases. Secondly, HDMW zone has a
low population density due to mostly desert environmental condition. Thus, a small number
of influenza cases might generate a relative higher notification rate in a postal-level location
with a low population density. Thirdly, interactions between the three age groups in the same
postal locations could exist. However, the interaction might be explained by spatial
correlation of geographical neighbourhoods. Although the transmission rates were estimated
separately by the three Bayesian space-time models, the random effect ui in the models could
capture the effects of unobserved factors with spatial pattern to adjust for the estimated
transmission rates. Fourthly, social environmental factors would have largely varies in a long-
term dataset. To reduce the impact, the data only included three years in our project. Further
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
19
analysis incorporating social and environmental factors needs to expand the data in recent
years to better improve our understanding of seasonal influenza epidemics.
Conclusion
This is first study to comprehensively investigate seasonal influenza characteristics by virus
type, age group and climatic zones on the basis of air temperature and humidity across
Australia. Our analyses showed that overall mean weekly notification rate of influenza A was
greater than that of influenza B, although they had a similar seasonal epidemic pattern at a
nationwide level during the study period. However, there were substantial differences in the
characteristics of seasonal influenza A and B epidemics among the six climatic zones and
three age groups. Our findings provide important information that can be used to guide public
health authorities in developing more flexible strategies for prevention and control of
seasonal influenza for a specific age group and a specific climatic zone in Australia.
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
20
Notes
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Acknowledgements:
We would like to express our gratitude to the Office of Health Protection, Australian
Government Department of Health for providing laboratory confirmed influenza notification
data on behalf of the Communicable Diseases Network Australia. We would like to express
our sincere thanks to Office of Health Protection, Australian Government Department of
Health for their helpful comments and suggestions that helped us to improve the quality of
the manuscript. W.H was supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship
(FT140101216).
Additional information
Competing financial interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
21
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). 2011 Census QuickStats. Avaliable at
http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/
3?opendocument&navpos=220. Accessed at 2/06/2014.
Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology. (2016a). Average annual & monthly
maximum, minimum, & mean temperature. Retrieved 15/12/2017
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/ncc/climate_averages/temperature/index.jsp?maptype=3&
period=dry
Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology. (2016b). Climate classification maps.
Retrieved 19/4, 2017, from http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/ncc/climate_averages/climate-
classifications/index.jsp
Australian Government Department of Health. (2015). National immunisation program
schedlule. Retrieved 30/11/2015
Azziz Baumgartner, E., Dao, C. N., Nasreen, S., Bhuiyan, M. U., Mah-E-Muneer, S., Mamun,
A. A., . . . Bresee, J. (2012). Seasonality, Timing, and Climate Drivers of Influenza
Activity Worldwide. The Journal of infectious diseases, 206(6), 838-846. doi:
10.1093/infdis/jis467
Bernstein, E., Kaye, D., Abrutyn, E., Gross, P., Dorfman, M., & Murasko, D. M. (1999).
Immune response to influenza vaccination in a large healthy elderly population.
Vaccine, 17(1), 82-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(98)00117-0
Besag, J., York, J., & Mollie, A. (1991). Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in
spatial statistics. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 43, 1-59.
Bloom-Feshbach, K., Alonso, W. J., Charu, V., Tamerius, J., Simonsen, L., Miller, M. A., &
Viboud, C. (2013). Latitudinal variations in seasonal activity of influenza and
respiratory syncytial virus (RSV): a global comparative review. PloS one, 8(2),
e54445.
Deyle, E. R., Maher, M. C., Hernandez, R. D., Basu, S., & Sugihara, G. (2016). Global
environmental drivers of influenza. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
113(46), 13081-13086.
DiazGranados , C. A., Dunning , A. J., Kimmel , M., Kirby , D., Treanor , J., Collins , A., . . .
Talbot , H. K. (2014). Efficacy of High-Dose versus Standard-Dose Influenza
Vaccine in Older Adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(7), 635-645. doi:
10.1056/NEJMoa1315727
Dorigatti, I., Cauchemez, S., & Ferguson, N. M. (2013). Increased transmissibility explains
the third wave of infection by the 2009 H1N1 pandemic virus in England.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(33), 13422-13427.
He, D., Dushoff, J., Eftimie, R., & Earn, D. J. (2013). Patterns of spread of influenza A in
Canada. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences,
280(1770), 20131174.
Huang, X., Clements, A. C., Williams, G., Mengersen, K., Tong, S., & Hu, W. (2016).
Bayesian estimation of the dynamics of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza
transmission in Queensland: A space–time SIR-based model. Environmental
Research, 146, 308-314.
Huang, X., Mengersen, K., Milinovich, G., & Hu, W. (2017). Effect of Weather Variability
on Seasonal Influenza Among Different Age Groups in Queensland, Australia: A
Bayesian Spatiotemporal Analysis. The Journal of infectious diseases, 215(11), 1695-
1701.
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
22
Lawson, A. B., & Song, H.-R. (2010). Bayesian hierarchical modeling of the dynamics of
spatio-temporal influenza season outbreaks. Spatial and Spatio-temporal
Epidemiology, 1(2), 187-195.
Lone Simonsen. (1999). The global impact of influenza on morbidity and mortality. Vaccine,
17, S3-S10.
Lowen, A., & Palese, P. (2009). Transmission of influenza virus in temperate zones is
predominantly by aerosol, in the tropics by contact: A hypothesis. PLoS Curr, 1,
RRN1002. doi: 10.1371/currents.RRN1002
Lowen, A. C., & Steel, J. (2014). Roles of humidity and temperature in shaping influenza
seasonality. Journal of virology, 88(14), 7692-7695.
McElhaney, J. E., Beran, J., Devaster, J.-M., Esen, M., Launay, O., Leroux-Roels, G., . . .
Oostvogels, L. (2013). AS03-adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted inactivated trivalent
influenza vaccine against seasonal influenza in elderly people: a phase 3 randomised
trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 13(6), 485-496. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70046-X
Moura, F. E. (2010). Influenza in the tropics. Current opinion in infectious diseases, 23(5),
415-420.
Moura, F. E., Perdigão, A. C., & Siqueira, M. M. (2009). Seasonality of influenza in the
tropics: a distinct pattern in northeastern Brazil. The American journal of tropical
medicine and hygiene, 81(1), 180-183.
National Centre for Immunisation Research & Surveillance. (2017). Vaccines for Australian
adults: information for immunisation providers. Retrieved 19/12/2017
http://www.ncirs.edu.au/assets/provider_resources/fact-sheets/adult-vaccination-fact-
sheet.pdf
Osterholm, M. T., Kelley, N. S., Sommer, A., & Belongia, E. A. (2012). Efficacy and
effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The
Lancet Infectious Diseases, 12(1), 36-44. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70295-X
Saha, S., Chadha, M., Al Mamun, A., Rahman, M., Sturm-Ramirez, K., Chittaganpitch,
M., . . . Setiawaty, V. (2014). Influenza seasonality and vaccination timing in tropical
and subtropical areas of southern and south-eastern Asia. Bulletin of the World Health
Organization, 92(5), 318-330.
Shaman, J., Goldstein, E., & Lipsitch, M. (2010). Absolute humidity and pandemic versus
epidemic influenza. American journal of epidemiology, 173(2), 127-135.
Shaman, J., Pitzer, V. E., Viboud, C., Grenfell, B. T., & Lipsitch, M. (2010). Absolute
humidity and the seasonal onset of influenza in the continental United States. PLoS
biology, 8(2), e1000316.
Soebiyanto, R. P., Adimi, F., & Kiang, R. K. (2010). Modeling and Predicting Seasonal
Influenza Transmission in Warm Regions Using Climatological Parameters. PloS one,
5(3), e9450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009450
Tamerius, J., Nelson, M. I., Zhou, S. Z., Viboud, C., Miller, M. A., & Alonso, W. J. (2011).
Global influenza seasonality: reconciling patterns across temperate and tropical
regions. Environmental health perspectives, 119(4), 439.
Tamerius, J. D., Shaman, J., Alonso, W. J., Bloom-Feshbach, K., Uejio, C. K., Comrie, A., &
Viboud, C. (2013). Environmental predictors of seasonal influenza epidemics across
temperate and tropical climates. PLoS Pathog, 9(3), e1003194.
WHO. (2016). Influenza (Seasonal). http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs211/en/
Yazdanbakhsh, M., & Kremsner, P. G. (2009). Influenza in Africa. PLoS medicine, 6(12),
e1000182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000182
Yu, H., Alonso, W. J., Feng, L., Tan, Y., Shu, Y., Yang, W., & Viboud, C. (2013).
Characterization of regional influenza seasonality patterns in China and implications
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
23
for vaccination strategies: spatio-temporal modeling of surveillance data. PLoS
medicine, 10(11), e1001552.
Figure legends:
Figure 1. The spatial variations in the observed mean weekly notification rates of influenza A
and B for the three age groups by the postal areas across Australia during the study period
Figure 2. The line plots (with 95% confidence intervals) show the significant differences ( red
lines) in the mean of weekly notification rates of influenza A and B between the different
climatic zones in each age group using Dunnett-Tukey-Kramer (DTK) Pairwise Multiple
Comparison Test adjusted for unequal variances and unequal sample sizes.
Figure 3. Heatmaps for the observed overall mean weekly notification rates of influenza A
and B among the six climatic zones in each age group during the study period.
Figure 4. The scatter plots with linear growth regression lines from the linear regression
models for means of estimated transmission rates of influenza A and B in each climatic zones
and each age group during the study period.
Figure 5. The scatter plots with linear decay regression lines from the linear regression
models for means of estimated transmission rates of influenza A and B in each climatic zones
and each age group during the study period.
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
24
Table 1. Summary of the observed mean weekly notification rates of influenza A and B by
postal level for the three age groups in the six climatic zones during the study period.
Climate zones
0-14 years 15-64 years ≥ 65 years
Mean SD Min Max Mean SD Min Max Mean SD Min Max
Influenza A
HHS 3.69 5.97 0.0 43.32 3.0 6.12 0.0 75.32 3.14 5.73 0.0 55.56
WHS 4.91 3.57 0.0 22.03 2.69 1.61 0.0 8.8 2.78 2.29 0.0 13.04
HDMW 2.51 3.61 0.0 16.18 3.29 4.76 0.0 24.49 1.58 2.48 0.0 8.21
HDCW 2.57 5.24 0.0 41.84 2.01 3.67 0.0 45.64 2.13 4.23 0.0 34.72
WSCW 2.83 5.92 0.0 112.75 1.78 3.01 0.0 57.17 2.09 3.4 0.0 58.09
MSCW 1.90 2.92 0.0 19.36 1.44 1.46 0.0 7.39 2.16 3.01 0.0 16.81
Influenza B
HHS 2.08 3.35 0.0 25.16 1.1 1.84 0.0 14.29 0.49 1.1 0.0 9.9
WHS 2.41 1.71 0.0 7.18 0.74 0.59 0.0 5.26 0.61 0.81 0.0 6.52
HDMW 3.25 6.04 0.0 29.62 1.21 2.15 0.0 10.04 0.41 0.95 0.0 3.15
HDCW 1.73 4.35 0.0 43.63 0.67 1.41 0.0 12.72 0.45 2.05 0.0 31.95
WSCW 1.85 3.36 0.0 50.82 0.65 1.1 0.0 13.74 0.58 1.89 0.0 37.58
MSCW 0.78 1.34 0.0 10.31 0.42 0.68 0.0 4.73 0.79 6.74 0.0 91.28
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
25
Table 2. Summary of influenza epidemic duration of the year in the three age groups by the
six climatic zones during 2011 to 2013.
Climatic zones 0-14 years 15-64 years ≥ 65 years
Mean SD range Mean SD Range Mean SD Range
Influenza A
HHS 28 16.6 9-40 28 16.4 10-42 30.7 18.8 9-42
WHS 13.7 4.6 11-19 10.7 0.6 10-11 20.7 15 11-38
HDMW 22.3 19.1 8-44 26.3 19.2 9-47 39.3 5.5 34-45
HDCW 14.7 6.4 11-22 12 1.7 10-13 29 18 9-44
WSCW 13 3 10-16 13 2 11-15 15.3 3.2 13-19
MSCW 14.7 6.1 8-20 11.3 3.1 8-14 28.7 18.9 8-45
Influenza B
HHS 27.7 10.1 17-37 32 16.5 13-43 41.3 13.3 26-49
WHS 11.7 2.1 10-14 14 3.5 12-18 34 5.3 28-38
HDMW 17.3 0.6 17-18 37 18.2 16-48 13 1.4 12-14
HDCW 15 4.4 12-20 24.3 20.6 11-48 39.3 15.5 22-52
WSCW 15.7 6.1 10-22 13.7 0.6 13-14 17.3 4 15-22
MSCW 18.3 2.5 16-21 20 12.1 13-34 32 3.6 29-36
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
26
Table 3. Influenza epidemic peak timing of the year by the six climatic zones in the three age
groups during 2011 to 2013. The peak timing was defined as the week with the highest
overall mean weekly notification rates by climatic zone in each year.
Climatic zone 0-14 years 15-64 years ≥ 65 years
2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013
Influenza A
HHS 31 32 11 31 33 11 7 33 12
WHS 31 32 35 31 32 35 31 33 35
HDMW 31 33 38 31 33 33 51 28 49
HDCW 33 32 34 35 32 35 34 33 37
WSCW 32 27 35 31 28 35 38 28 34
MSCW 29 28 34 29 29 35 32 31 39
Influenza B
HHS 32 31 50 33 29 41 36 38 47
WHS 32 35 34 34 35 35 34 37 39
HDMW 22 33 31 14 33 35 25 28 --
HDCW 36 31 48 31 32 34 31 31 36
WSCW 33 33 35 31 36 35 29 33 35
MSCW 33 37 35 30 28 35 31 32 36
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
27
Table 4. Averages of posterior means and 95% credible intervals for weekly transmision rates
across the six climatic zones from the Bayesian space-time models for the three age groups
during the study period.
Climate zone 0-14 years 15-64 years ≥ 65 years
Mean 95% Credible interval Mean 95% Credible interval Mean 95% Credible interval
Influenza A
HHS 0.0103 0.0013 – 0.2015 0.0083 0.0008 – 0.1407 0.0093 0.0008 – 0.2439
WHS 0.0147 0.0017 – 0.1805 0.0079 0.0008 – 0.0949 0.0094 0.0009 – 0.1715
HDMW 0.0075 0.0006 – 0.2056 0.0088 0.0006 – 0.1765 0.0035 0.0003 – 0.2021
HDCW 0.0076 0.0006 – 0.1704 0.0057 0.0005 – 0.1277 0.0056 0.0006 – 0.1701
WSCW 0.0091 0.0008 – 0.1578 0.0058 0.0005 – 0.0966 0.0061 0.0005 – 0.1496
MSCW 0.0055 0.0005 – 0.1109 0.0043 0.0004 – 0.0853 0.0056 0.0006 – 0.1307
Influenza B
HHS 0.0049 0.0004 – 0.1329 0.0027 0.0002 – 0.0641
WHS 0.0086 0.0008 – 0.1332 0.0028 0.0002 – 0.045
HDMW 0.0051 0.0001 – 0.1762 0.0031 0.0002 – 0.0734
HDCW 0.0042 0.0004 – 0.12 0.0016 0.0001 – 0.0509
WSCW 0.0058 0.0005 – 0.1174 0.0019 0.0001 – 0.0443
MSCW 0.0019 0.0001 – 0.0611 0.0013 0.0001 – 0.0327
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
28
Figure 1
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
29
Figure 2
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
30
Figure 3
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
31
Figure 4
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
32
Figure 5
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714
33
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3307714