Upload
lorena-stewart
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
1.Sourcing / Before you examine a piece of evidence, ask yourself: / Who made this? (Or who wrote it?) Is this person believable? / What kind of evidence is it? (Diary entry? Police report? Newspaper article?) / Why was it made? / When was this made? (A long or short time after the event? / Before you examine a piece of evidence, ask yourself: / Who made this? (Or who wrote it?) Is this person believable? / What kind of evidence is it? (Diary entry? Police report? Newspaper article?) / Why was it made? / When was this made? (A long or short time after the event?
Citation preview
Thinking Like a Historian
Why think like a historian? To better be able to determine
what information is believable. To support conclusions and
statements with reliable information.
To better understand an event or person in history!
1.Sourcing Before you examine a piece of evidence,
ask yourself: Who made this? (Or who wrote it?) Is this
person believable? What kind of evidence is it? (Diary entry?
Police report? Newspaper article?) Why was it made? When was this made? (A long or short time
after the event?
Sourcing When analyzing a source, there are
characteristics that make a source more or less reliable, such as: Credibility of the author Commitment of author to the
information? Anonymous? Signed under oath?
Motive for creating document / evidence Witness or not?
Is this credible? Tree octopus Dog Island
Practice
Why do historians need to source?
2.Corroboration Investigate:
What do other pieces of evidence say? Am I finding the same information everywhere? Am I finding different versions of the story? (If so,
why?) Where else could I look to find out about this? Which pieces of evidence are or would be most
believable?
Corroboration What do you do if you find information
from two pieces of evidence that contradict each other? How do you know which to believe?
Mini-Activity Dropping of the bomb varying
perspectives
Why do historians need to corroborate information?
3.Contextualization In your mind, visualize:
What was it like to be alive in the past?
What was going on at the time and place?
What things were different back then? What things were the same?
What would it look like to see this event through the eyes of someone who lived back then?
Contextualization How do we understand the context
of a time and place?
How is the world different today than it was when you were born?
Why do historians need to contextualize?
What claims does the author make? • What evidence does the author use to support those claims? • How is this document make me feel? • What words or phrases does the author use to convince me that he/she is right? • What information does the author leave out?
4.Close Reading
Media Bias…. Fox News MSNBC CNN Analyzing political parties: Democrats and
Republicans. Go to each website above and find
evidence….story headlines, pictures, to support which political party each website favors.
Putting new knowledge and skills to application
Cuban Missile Crisis Thinking Like Historians Activity
Historical ThinkingWhat are the methods of historical thinking we talked about in class?
Explain each method in your own words.
Post it Note What do you know of the Cuban
Missile Crisis? OR What do you want to know about the Missile Crisis?
#1: Video Source Cuban Missile Crisis
Using Historical thinking skills, what information were you able to obtain from this source?
Stop at 60 mins.
Textbook Corroboration Out of Many (998-999) American Journey (869-870) World History (pg. 635)
Examination of Primary and Secondary Sources
As a group, what is your hypothesis? Who do you think should receive credit for averting the Cuban Missile Crisis?
Cuban Missile Crisis
In your notebook include facts, data, anything to support your hypothesis!
Who is the Hero? Marking the 53rd anniversary of the event, the United Nations
would like to honor the person/s and/or country responsible for stopping the Cuban Missile Crisis.
As a group decide who you feel is the “hero” and responsible for stopping a war over the Cuban Missile Crisis? John F. Kennedy Nikita Khrushchev Fidel Castro Secretary of Defense, Dean Rusk Attorney General, Robert Kennedy Soviet Ambassador, Dobrynin Commandante Ernesto Guevara of Cuba Robert Goodwin, Specialist on Latin America Affairs
Expectations Provide evidence to support who you feel deserves that
honor. Think of it as writing a paper stating your claim and
supporting evidence but do that creating a Power Point. Do not just recite facts….state why it proves your
theory. Be sure to have data….facts, video, personal testimony
to defend your argument. Conclude your argument with final thoughts and reason
for your conclusion. Work together, use correct spelling and grammar, give
your best effort!