27
Thinking Like a Historian

Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

1.Sourcing / Before you examine a piece of evidence, ask yourself: / Who made this? (Or who wrote it?) Is this person believable? / What kind of evidence is it? (Diary entry? Police report? Newspaper article?) / Why was it made? / When was this made? (A long or short time after the event? / Before you examine a piece of evidence, ask yourself: / Who made this? (Or who wrote it?) Is this person believable? / What kind of evidence is it? (Diary entry? Police report? Newspaper article?) / Why was it made? / When was this made? (A long or short time after the event?

Citation preview

Page 1: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Thinking Like a Historian

Page 2: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Why think like a historian? To better be able to determine

what information is believable. To support conclusions and

statements with reliable information.

To better understand an event or person in history!

Page 3: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

1.Sourcing Before you examine a piece of evidence,

ask yourself: Who made this? (Or who wrote it?) Is this

person believable? What kind of evidence is it? (Diary entry?

Police report? Newspaper article?) Why was it made? When was this made? (A long or short time

after the event?

Page 4: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Sourcing When analyzing a source, there are

characteristics that make a source more or less reliable, such as: Credibility of the author Commitment of author to the

information? Anonymous? Signed under oath?

Motive for creating document / evidence Witness or not?

Page 5: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Is this credible? Tree octopus Dog Island

Page 6: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Practice

Page 7: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements
Page 8: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements
Page 9: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements
Page 10: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Why do historians need to source?

Page 11: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

2.Corroboration Investigate:

What do other pieces of evidence say? Am I finding the same information everywhere? Am I finding different versions of the story? (If so,

why?) Where else could I look to find out about this? Which pieces of evidence are or would be most

believable?

Page 12: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Corroboration What do you do if you find information

from two pieces of evidence that contradict each other? How do you know which to believe?

Page 13: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Mini-Activity Dropping of the bomb varying

perspectives

Page 14: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Why do historians need to corroborate information?

Page 15: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

3.Contextualization In your mind, visualize:

What was it like to be alive in the past?

What was going on at the time and place?

What things were different back then? What things were the same?

What would it look like to see this event through the eyes of someone who lived back then?

Page 16: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Contextualization How do we understand the context

of a time and place?

How is the world different today than it was when you were born?

Page 17: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Why do historians need to contextualize?

Page 18: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

What claims does the author make? • What evidence does the author use to support those claims? • How is this document make me feel? • What words or phrases does the author use to convince me that he/she is right? • What information does the author leave out?

4.Close Reading

Page 19: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Media Bias…. Fox News MSNBC CNN Analyzing political parties: Democrats and

Republicans. Go to each website above and find

evidence….story headlines, pictures, to support which political party each website favors.

Page 20: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Putting new knowledge and skills to application

Cuban Missile Crisis Thinking Like Historians Activity

Page 21: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Historical ThinkingWhat are the methods of historical thinking we talked about in class?

Explain each method in your own words.

Page 22: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Post it Note What do you know of the Cuban

Missile Crisis? OR What do you want to know about the Missile Crisis?

Page 23: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

#1: Video Source Cuban Missile Crisis

Using Historical thinking skills, what information were you able to obtain from this source?

Stop at 60 mins.

Page 24: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Textbook Corroboration Out of Many (998-999) American Journey (869-870) World History (pg. 635)

Page 25: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Examination of Primary and Secondary Sources

As a group, what is your hypothesis? Who do you think should receive credit for averting the Cuban Missile Crisis?

Cuban Missile Crisis

In your notebook include facts, data, anything to support your hypothesis!

Page 26: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Who is the Hero? Marking the 53rd anniversary of the event, the United Nations

would like to honor the person/s and/or country responsible for stopping the Cuban Missile Crisis.

As a group decide who you feel is the “hero” and responsible for stopping a war over the Cuban Missile Crisis? John F. Kennedy Nikita Khrushchev Fidel Castro Secretary of Defense, Dean Rusk Attorney General, Robert Kennedy Soviet Ambassador, Dobrynin Commandante Ernesto Guevara of Cuba Robert Goodwin, Specialist on Latin America Affairs

Page 27: Thinking Like a Historian. Why think like a historian? / To better be able to determine what information is believable. / To support conclusions and statements

Expectations Provide evidence to support who you feel deserves that

honor. Think of it as writing a paper stating your claim and

supporting evidence but do that creating a Power Point. Do not just recite facts….state why it proves your

theory. Be sure to have data….facts, video, personal testimony

to defend your argument. Conclude your argument with final thoughts and reason

for your conclusion. Work together, use correct spelling and grammar, give

your best effort!