Thin Film Si H Based Solarcells

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 Thin Film Si H Based Solarcells

    1/6

    Vacuum 82 (2008) 11451150

    Thin-film Si:H-based solar cells

    C.R. Wronskia,1, B. Von Roedernb, A. Ko"odziejc,

    aElectrical Engineering Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USAbNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401-3393, USA

    cAGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland

    Abstract

    Recent developments in the photovoltaic (PV) industry, driven by a shortage of solar grade Si feedstock to grow Si wafers or ribbons,have stimulated a strong renewed interest in thin-film technologies and in particular in solar cells based on protocrystalline hydrogenated

    amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) or nanocrystalline/microcrystalline (nc/mc)-Si:H. There are a number of institutions around the world

    developing protocrystalline thin-film Si:H technologies as well as those based on tandem and triple junction cells consisting of a-Si:H,

    a-Si:Ge:H and nc/mc-Si:H. There are also several large commercial companies actively marketing large production-scale plasma-

    enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) deposition equipment for the production of such modules. Reduction in the cost of the

    modules can be achieved by increasing their stabilized efficiencies and the deposition rates of the Si:H materials. In this paper, recent

    results are presented which provide insights into the nature of protocrystalline Si:H materials, optimization of cell structures and their

    light-induced degradation that are helpful in addressing these issues. The activities in these areas that are being carried out in the United

    States are also briefly reviewed.

    r 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: Thin silicon film; Phase transition; Solar cells; Stability

    1. Introduction

    1.1. Amorphous and nanocrystalline Si film-based

    photovoltaic (PV) modules

    Some 25 years ago, some researchers in the PV research

    arena predicted a rapid transition from wafer or ribbon-

    based Si modules to thin-film amorphous silicon (a-Si)-

    based modules [1]. This switch did not occur because the

    stabilized efficiency of a-Si-based modules did not reach

    the expected 10% level. Also, the competing wafer (ribbon)Si-based technologies were able to implement, unforeseen

    then, advances in both performance and manufacturing

    cost reduction. However, a renewed interest in a-Si-based

    modules appears to be driven by the following factors:

    (a) Si feedstock shortages for wafer/ribbon Si; (b) the

    advances in thin-film processing; (c) the quest for a low-

    energy budget (low-Tprocess) solar module manufacturing

    process relying on practical limitless silane feedstock;

    (d) the advent of nanocrystalline/microcrystalline (nc/mc)

    Si solar cells that triggered hope for greater stabilized

    performance. Todays commercially available a-Si-based

    modules range in efficiency (as rated by their manufac-

    turers) 4.58.5% conversion efficiency. This performance is

    high enough to compete with wafer/ribbon-based silicon

    modules in a number of applications. There is also the hope

    to further improvements in stabilized module performance.Research attempts to better the performance of a-Si:H

    and/or nc-Si:H-based solar cells currently focus on two

    primary factors that increase the cost of a-Si-based PV

    modules: (a) low stabilized solar cell/module efficiency and

    (b) low deposition rates requiring significant investment

    into capital-intensive vacuum deposition equipment. A key

    limitation on the stabilized efficiencies of the a-Si:H cells

    are the light-induced defects associated with the Staeble-

    rWronski effect (SWE) [2]. Recent progress in improving

    the understanding of this effect is discussed below in terms

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    www.elsevier.com/locate/vacuum

    0042-207X/$- see front matter r 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.01.043

    Corresponding author. Fax: +4812 63323 98.

    E-mail addresses: [email protected] (C.R. Wronski),

    [email protected] (A. Kolodziej).1Also for correspondence.

    http://www.elsevier.com/locate/vacuumhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_9/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.01.043mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_9/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.01.043http://www.elsevier.com/locate/vacuum
  • 7/28/2019 Thin Film Si H Based Solarcells

    2/6

    of the creation kinetics and nature of the light-induced

    defect states as well as their dependence on microstructure

    of the a-Si:H. Researchers pursued hydrogen dilution,

    also discussed below, as a mitigation scheme that can

    reduce the amount of StaeblerWronski degradation.

    Unfortunately, hydrogen dilution also lowers the deposi-

    tion rate. Today, champion solar cells are made usingdeposition times as low as 0.1 nm/s, and commercial

    modules are produced at rates of 0.3 nm/s. This requires

    production times on the order of 30min for the film

    deposition; requiring large vacuum plasma-enhanced che-

    mical vapor deposition (PECVD) coaters. Employing

    even higher hydrogen dilution results in the deposition of

    nc/mc films, which have also been used to fabricate low-T

    deposited solar cells [3]. Some entities, especially in Europe

    and Japan, expect that the incorporation of an nc/mc-Si cell

    into a multijunction cell stack should improve its stabilized

    performance.

    2. Hydrogen dilution and protocrystallinity

    Continuous progress in the performance of a-Si:H-based

    solar cells has been made by improving the quality of

    the materials and cell structures. This, however, has been

    achieved with approaches that were mainly empirical

    due, primarily, to the absence of a clear understanding of

    material growth and microstructure as well as the subtle

    and not so subtle differences in their properties. As a

    result even the improvements obtained by using a-Si:H

    materials deposited with hydrogen dilution of silane [4,5]

    were not understood. Thus it was difficult to control

    them and carry out improvements in a systematic way.However, recently the growth and microstructure of these

    hydrogen diluted protocrystalline Si:H materials has

    been characterized [6,7] and new insights have been

    obtained into both, their nature as well as their PV

    properties. Under protocrystalline Si:H growth conditions

    there is a unique evolutionary growth behavior, and the

    protocrystalline material itself exhibits unique opto-

    electronic properties. Using the real-time spectroscopic

    ellipsometry (RTSE), first developed by Collins et al. [8,9],

    to characterize thin-film growth and microstructure it

    has been shown that the thin-film Si:H prepared under

    moderate-to-high H2-dilution conditions evolves from the

    amorphous phase to a mixed amorphous+nano/micro-

    crystalline phase [(a+nc/mc)-Si:H] with the accumulated

    thickness of the layer. The thin-film material in the

    amorphous regime of growth has been called protocrystal-

    line a-Si:H and exhibits a higher degree of ordering

    than materials deposited under similar conditions without

    H2-dilution [10]. Despite the evolutionary nature of the

    Si:H materials prepared with moderate H2-dilution, they

    exhibit relatively uniform bulk properties over certain

    extended regions of thickness. Using phase diagrams

    as a guide, it is possible to identify and control this

    evolutionary nature in both films as well as solar cell

    structures in which the effects of transitions between the

    different phases in solar cell structures have been studied

    and characterized.

    A key capability of RTSE is the ability to generate

    deposition phase diagrams for different deposition condi-

    tions and substrate materials. These diagrams identify the

    ranges of thickness over which it is possible to obtain the

    pure protocrystalline phase and the ranges correspondingto the mixed-phase deposition as well as insights into the

    control of the phase transitions for applications in device

    fabrication. These uses of the phase diagram have allowed

    characterization of the bulk properties of protocrystalline

    Si:H films as well as the fabrication of highly controlled cell

    structures.

    In Fig. 1, it is shown a schematic of the structure of Si:H

    films derived from phase diagrams prepared as a function

    of hydrogen dilution R [H]/[SiH4] is shown for Si:H

    deposited onto an undiluted R 0 substrate layer at a

    substrate temperature of 2001C. It can be seen that

    with decrease of R there is a continuous decrease of the

    thickness at which the transition of protocrystalline a-Si:H

    into the a+nc/mc phase occurs. This characteristic has very

    important consequences in the design of protocrystalline

    solar cells with different thickness, which until now have

    not been recognized. Another feature is the increase with R

    in the nucleation density of nc/mc-Si at the a-a+nc/mc

    transition which are key to the subsequent growth of the

    a+nc/mc mixed phase. A third point that can be made is

    the decrease with R of the range of boundaries between

    which the a+nc/mc-Si:H phase present before coalescing

    into the mc-Si:H phase. Deposition phase diagrams have

    also been developed to guide the increases in deposition

    rates in which the effects of higher power densities on theevolution of protocrystalline Si:H have been characterized

    [8]. Exemplary applications of phase diagrams have been

    demonstrated for tandem and triple solar cell structures

    with using a-Si:H, a-Si1xGex:H with low Ge content and

    mc-Si:H received by hydrogen dilution and higher than

    300 1C substrates temperature [11].

    RTSE studies have also indicated that the way to

    improve protocrystalline Si:H cells is to use what may be

    called phase engineering of Si:H solar cells that exploits

    microstructurally engineered structures for the improved

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    Fig. 1. Schematic of the structure of Si:H films prepared as a function ofR.

    The dashed and dotted lines identify the a-(a+nc/mc), and (a+nc/mc)-mc

    transitions, respectively. Also indicated are the corresponding densities Nd

    of nc-Si:H nuclei present at the a-(a+nc/mc) transition.

    C.R. Wronski et al. / Vacuum 82 (2008) 114511501146

  • 7/28/2019 Thin Film Si H Based Solarcells

    3/6

    performance [12]. Two examples are presented here to

    illustrate how the ability to control the microstructure of

    the materials allows phase engineering to be carried out in

    a systematic way. The first shows how a protocrystalline

    a-Si:H silicon carbide pin cell structure has been

    optimized with a microstructurally engineered p/i interface

    region obtained by a two-step variation of the i-layerH2-dilution ratio [13,14]. This is illustrated with results on

    customized cells in which different thickness R=40 Si:H

    layers were inserted into cells having 4000 A , R=10

    i-layers. The light IVs of cells having 100, 200, 300, and

    400A thick R=40 layers in the p/i interface region are

    shown in Fig. 2. The corresponding AFM images of the

    R 40 i-layers are shown in Fig. 3. The introduction of the

    R 40 p/i interface regions of 100 and 200 A thickness

    increases the Voc from the 0.88 V baseline value obtained

    without an interface region to 0.92 and 0.93 V, respectively,

    without altering the fill factors (FF). Subsequent increase

    in the thickness of the R 40 layer to 300 and 400A ,

    however, significantly reduces both the Voc and the FF.

    These changes can be related to the transition into the

    mixed phase identified with SRTE and consistent with the

    AFM results in Fig. 3.

    The other example is for p-Si:H contacts on a-Si:H nip

    solar cells where the results of these layers deposited on

    a-Si:H clearly show a very strong thickness dependence

    of the electronic properties of the film, as it evolves from

    protocrystalline Si:H to a (a+nc/mc)-Si:H mixed phase.

    The evolution of the microstructure with thickness in the

    p-Si:H layers deposited with constant doping ratio, but

    different R values, is illustrated in Fig. 4. In Fig. 4, the

    regions of protocrystalline Si:H, mixed (a+nc/mc)-Si:H,and purely microcrystalline Si:H phases can be clearly

    identified.

    Also shown in Fig. 4 are the 1sun Voc values obtained

    from corresponding nip solar cell structures fabricated

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    Fig. 2. Light IV characteristics of the customized pin solar

    cells fabricated with the two-step i-layer having different thickness

    p/i interface layers.

    Fig. 3. 22mm2 AFM images of the R 40 Si:H films at the same

    thickness used in the customized cell structures.

    Fig. 4. Extended phase diagram for p-Si:H deposited on protocrystalline

    a-Si:H as function ofR and thickness. Also shown is the 1 sun Voc for cell

    structures with corresponding $200A p-layers.

    C.R. Wronski et al. / Vacuum 82 (2008) 11451150 1147

  • 7/28/2019 Thin Film Si H Based Solarcells

    4/6

    with $200A of these p-layers. The highest Voc is achieved

    by the cell having a R 150 p-layer which is in the

    protocrystalline a-Si:H phase and where its growth is

    terminated at, or close to the transition into the mixed

    (a+nc/mc)-Si:H phase [15,16]. In the case of R=100,

    the p-layer is amorphous throughout its thickness and the

    200A thickness is nowhere close to the transition into amixed phase.

    On the other hand, for the R=200 cell, the p-layer is in

    the form of a mixed (a+nc/mc)-Si:H phase right from the

    beginning and evolves into a purely microcrystalline phase

    at the thickness of$200A . These results clearly point to

    the highest VOC being obtained with a protocrystalline

    a-Si:H p-layer which is deposited at a maximum R value

    that allows the desired thickness to be obtained without

    crossing the transition into the mixed-phase growth regime.

    It is interesting to point out here that until these deposition

    phase diagrams were obtained it was claimed that the

    optimum p contact layers were microcrystalline. This is the

    p-layers that were characterized were much thicker than

    the 100200 A in the solar cells so that transitions to the

    purely mc phase were present in those films [17].

    3. Light-induced changes in thin films and solar cells

    There is a serious challenge that has still to be overcome

    for further advances to be made in a-Si:H-based solar cell

    technology.

    It is the SWE, which was discovered in 1977 [2] but still

    imposes serious limitations on the performance of a-Si:H

    cells and panels. It is in the form of metastable defects that

    are created under illumination, which can be annealed outat temperatures above $150 1C.

    The reversible changes that occur between the annealed,

    initial, and the light soaked, degraded, states have

    become one of the most often investigated phenomena in

    a-Si:H-based material and solar cells.

    However, progress has been relatively slow in obtaining

    a definitive understanding and systematic control of the

    SWE. This is in large part due to the absence of a unique

    a-Si:H material so that the creation of the light-induced

    defects depends on the deposition conditions and resultant

    microstructure of the materials. It is also due to the studies

    focusing on the prevailing theories that attempted to

    explain all metastable phenomena solely in terms of a

    metastable light-induced neutral dangling bond defect [D0].

    Nevertheless, an empirical approach has led to some

    progress being made over the years not only in improving

    the initial properties of a-Si:H-based material but also in

    reducing their SWE by optimizing the growth conditions to

    improve their microstructure. The development of proto-

    crystalline a-Si:H materials has resulted in solar cells that

    not only have higher initial efficiencies, but even more

    importantly better end of life performance [18]. The

    significant improvements obtained with protocrystalline

    a-Si:H are illustrated in Fig. 5. Fig. 5 shows the changes of

    the FF under 1 sun illumination at 25 1C for a 4000 A pin

    solar cell with a protocrystalline (R 10) a-Si:H layer and

    an undiluted (R 0) intrinsic layer deposited under the

    same conditions. It can be pointed out here that in the

    corresponding films after such degradation the densities of

    the neutral dangling bonds, D0, were the same.

    These light-induced defects affect both the hole and

    electron transport that results in the significant reduction

    of the FF and performance in cells seen here and for

    example photoconductivity in corresponding thin-film

    materials. For a long time there has been a striking

    absence of direct correlations between the results of such

    measurements on films and cells, which has seriouslylimited the ability to systematically improve the stability of

    a-Si:H solar cells based on the optimization studies on thin-

    film materials. Recently however, results have been

    obtained which not only clearly establish direct and

    quantitative correlations between the light-induced defects

    created in a-Si:H films and their corresponding cells but

    which have also shed new light on the nature of the light-

    induced defects as well as the possible mechanisms for

    SWE. An example of such correlations is illustrated with

    results that are shown in Fig. 5. In Fig. 5, there are

    shown the excellent overlaps in the changes of the gap

    states under 1 sun illumination as reflected in the solar cell

    by the recombination of injected carriers at 0.4 V forward

    bias [19] and in the corresponding film by the reciprocal

    of the photocurrent for a carrier generation rate of

    2 1016 cm2 s1 [20]. It is interesting to note that in the

    past, when the characterization of cells relied on effici-

    encies or FF, such direct comparison of recombination

    through the midgap states as illustrated here could not be

    carried out.

    Similar direct correlations have also been now obtained

    between the results of the recombination currents in cells

    and the densities of midgap states in films as measured with

    the Dual Beam Photoconductivity technique [20]. Results

    from such studies that are being carried out on both solar

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    Fig. 5. Fill factor under 1 sun illumination at 25 1C for pin solar cells

    with 400 nm i-layers deposited with R 0 (K) and R 10 (W) at 200 1Cas well as changes in the forward bias current in an a-Si:H cell (J) and the

    reciprocal of the current in the corresponding film (.) for a carrier

    generation rate of 21016 cm2 s1.

    C.R. Wronski et al. / Vacuum 82 (2008) 114511501148

  • 7/28/2019 Thin Film Si H Based Solarcells

    5/6

    cells and their corresponding intrinsic thin films have not

    only further substantiated the inadequacy of the extensive

    past characterization of light-induced changes in terms of

    just neutral dangling bond, D0, states [21], but also yielded

    important new information about the nature of the other

    states associated with SWE. These recent studies, which

    have also included the kinetics of the light-induced changesin the gap states of a-Si:H, have confirmed regimes with a

    t1/3 dependence such as it has been extensively reported

    for results on thin films. However, they have also clearly

    established that the evolution of just the light-induced

    midgap defect states follow a t1/2 dependence, which is

    inconsistent with the rate equation for the creation of light-

    induced defects that is generally used in modeling of SWE.

    The improved insights that are being developed into the

    nature of metastable defects point to new approaches for

    obtaining a better understanding of the role that micro-

    structure plays in determining the stability of a-Si:H

    and the mechanisms responsible for SWE. This offers the

    real possibility of further improving the performance of

    a-Si:H-based solar panels.

    4. Nanocrystalline/microcrystalline solar cells and

    micromorph multijunction cells

    In the mid-1990s, the University of Neuchatel

    (Switzerland) first produced nc-Si solar cells and micro-

    morph multijunction cells. The nc/mc-Si layers were

    obtained by high hydrogen dilution of the silane feed gas

    (490% of the gas being H2) as well as by changes in the

    frequency of the PECVD deposition (very high frequency,

    50100MHz, instead of the typical radio frequency13.56 MHz). This invention spurred the hope of achieving

    greater stabilized efficiency for a-Si film-based solar cells

    and modules [3]. Hence, several research groups around

    the world prepared nc/mc-Si and micromorph multi-

    junction [a-Si:H/nc/mc-Si:H] solar cells. The first commer-

    cial offering has been recently introduced by the Sharp

    Corporation, followed by a recent announcement of very

    high volume manufacturing capacity [100 MWp annual

    capacity after 2010].

    nc/mc-Si is a potential replacement for a-SiGe:H-based

    sub-cells in multijunction solar cells, because the nc-Si has

    absorption coefficients greater than a-Si [3]. Hence, an

    expectation exists of beating the performance of a-SiGe:H-

    based cells and simultaneously eliminating the use of

    expensive GeH4 gas for manufacturing. Drawback to these

    schemes is that nc-Si solar cells have the absorber

    thicknesses about 10 times thicker than a-SiGe:H cells

    (1.52mm) and that for these cells too, best results are

    obtained using slow deposition rates.

    Work by the Ju lich group suggested in 1999 that the best

    cells are obtained by growing the mixed-phase nc/mc layers

    [22] near the nanocrystalline/amorphous growth transition.

    These results were somewhat unexpected, but have been

    ubiquitously confirmed by other groups researching these

    materials. Since the microcrystalline deposition regime has

    to be avoided when fabricating high-efficiency solar cells,

    such cells can be referred to as nc-Si, although many

    groups also use the term microcrystalline for such cells.

    Based on the knowledge of a nanomicrocrystalline

    structure evolving with film thickness (Fig. 1), Uni-Solar

    has implemented the graded hydrogen dilution (reducing

    dilution as the films grow) to keep thicker films near thenc/mc-Si to a-Si transition [23]. Only time will tell if nc-Si

    solar cells, when incorporated into multijunction struc-

    tures, can enhance stabilized cell performance. The Uni-

    Solars current position is that nc/mc-Si cells are equivalent,

    but not yet better than a-SiGe:H-based solar cells.

    A concern with these rather thick cells is the long

    deposition time required. The performance of such cells is

    also extremely sensitive to processing detail, which may

    make scale up of the process (from R&D areas to

    commercial module areas) more challenging than PECVD

    deposition of a-Si:H-based cells. The United States PV

    program has supported a research effort on nc-Si solar cells

    at United Solar, and if better results can be obtained, they

    stand ready to implement manufacturing of nc-Si contain-

    ing micromorph modules.

    5. Conclusion and outlook

    In order to achieve further cost reduction for a-Si:H-

    based PV modules, it is highly desirable to increase their

    stabilized performance and simultaneously increase their

    deposition rates. A study has been conducted on estimating

    the potential module cost for various PV technologies. This

    study compares commercial module performance of PV

    modules using different cell technology fabricated withcomparable maturity in module manufacturing. It is

    argued that all successful PV technologies will eventually

    reach a similar degree of manufacturing maturity. It is then

    further assumed that a thin-film module will eliminate the

    costs fraction attributable to the Si wafer in a crystalline Si

    PV module. Based on this analysis, a-Si-based thin-film

    modules appear competitive, but in the near and midterm

    they may not provide the lowest-cost module option

    because of their lower performance [24]. However, the

    advantages of a low-temperature growth process, a

    virtually unlimited feedstock supply for manufacturing

    them, and the renewed interest from display manufacturingequipment manufactures is inherent to this PV technology.

    It is therefore imperative to continue work on overcoming

    the current stabilized performance shortfalls.

    References

    [1] Hamakawa Y. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 1985;49:239.

    [2] Staebler DL, Wronski CR. Appl Phys Lett 1977;31:292.

    [3] Shah A, Meier J, Torres P, Kroll U, Fischer D, Beck N, et al. In:

    Proceedings of the 26th IEEE PV specialists conference, 1997. p. 56974.

    [4] Yang L, Chen L. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 1994;336:66974.

    [5] Lee Y, Jiao L, Liu H, Lu Z, Collins RW, Wronski CR. In:

    Conference record of the 25th IEEE PVSC, New York, 1996.

    p. 11658.

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    C.R. Wronski et al. / Vacuum 82 (2008) 11451150 1149

  • 7/28/2019 Thin Film Si H Based Solarcells

    6/6

    [6] Collins RW, Ferlauto AS, Ferreira GM, Chen C, Koval RJ, Lee Y,

    et al. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 2003;762:A10.1.

    [7] Wronski CR, Pearce JM, Koval RJ, Niu X, Ferlauto AS, Koh J, et al.

    Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 2002;715:A13.4.

    [8] Collins RW, Koh J, Lu Y, Kim S, Burnham JS, Wronski CR. In:

    Conference record of the 25th IEEE PVSC, Washington, DC, USA,

    1996. p. 103540.

    [9] Collins RW, Koh J, Ferlauto A, Rovira P, Lee Y, Koval R, et al.Thin Solid Films 2000;364:12937.

    [10] Wronski CR, Collins RW. Sol Energy 2004;77:877.

    [11] Ko"odziej A, Krewniak P, Nowak S. Opto-Electron Rev 2003;11(4):

    2819.

    [12] Koh J, Fujiwara H, Lu Y, Wronski CR, Collins RW. Thin Solid

    Films 1998;313:469.

    [13] Koh J, Lee Y, Fujiwara H, Wronski CR, Collins RW. Appl Phys Lett

    1998;73:1526.

    [14] Koval RJ, Pearce JM, Ferlauto AS, Rovira PI, Collins RW, Wronski

    CR. In: Record of the 28th IEEE photovoltaic specialists conference

    proceedings, IEEE, 2000. p. 7503.

    [15] Koval RJ, Chen C, Ferreira GM, Ferlauto AS, Pearce JM, Rovira PI,

    et al. Mater Res Soc Proc 2002;715:A6.1.

    [16] Koval RJ, Pearce JM, Chen C, Ferreira GM, Ferlauto AS, Collins

    RW, et al. In: 29th IEEE photovoltaic specialists conference

    proceedings IEEE, 2002. p. 107681.

    [17] Guha S, Yang J, Nath P, Hack M. Appl Phys Lett 1986;49:218.

    [18] Wronski CR, Pearce JM, Koval RJ, Niu X, Ferlauto AS, Koh J, et al.

    Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 2002;715:459.[19] Deng J, Ross B, Albert M, Collins RW, Wronski CR. Mater Res Soc

    Symp Proc 2006;910:A02-02.

    [20] Deng J, Ross B, Albert M, Collins RW, Wronski CR. In: Fourth world

    conference on photovoltaic energy conference, IEEE, 2006, 1576pp.

    [21] Stutzmann M, Jackson WB, Tsai CC. Phys Rev B 1985;32:23.

    [22] Vetterl O, Finger F, Carius R, Hapke P, Houben L, Kluth O, et al.

    Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2000;62:97.

    [23] Yan B, Yue G, Yang J, Guha S, Williamson DL, Han D, et al. Mater

    Res Soc Symp Proc 2004;808:575.

    [24] von Roedern B. reFocus Magazine (Elsevier), July and August

    2006;34.

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    C.R. Wronski et al. / Vacuum 82 (2008) 114511501150