There is Still Room for Open Cardiovascular Surgery

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 There is Still Room for Open Cardiovascular Surgery

    1/1

    NOTAS DE LITERATURA /LITERATURE NOTES

    THERE IS STILL ROOM FOR OPEN CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERYAINDA H ESPAO PARA CIRURGIA CARDIOVASCULAR ABERTA

    David Gonalves Nordon*

    33

    Rev. Fac. Cinc.Md.Sorocaba,v.13,n.1,p. 33, 2011*Acadmicodo cursode Medicina- FCMS/PUC-SPRecebidoem14/4/2010.Aceitopara publicaoem15/7/2010.Contato: [email protected]

    Despite the constant announcements that opencardiovascular surgery as a surgical procedure is watching itsdecline, a new study published in the New England Journal ofMedicine (NEJM) shows that there is still some room forsuchprocedure.

    Thearticle entitled Endovascular versus OpenRepairof Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, published online at April11th, 2010, brings us the continuation of a median 6 year-follow-up study (minimum 5 and maximum 10 years follow-up) comparing the outcomes of endovascular repair ofabdominal aortic aneurism, which until then had shown

    impressive results in preoperative morbidity and mortality,andopen repair, whichhadshownmuch worseoutcomes.Nevertheless, as our eyes were already moving

    towards the new minimally invasive procedures, this articlecomes to changeeven the researchers' expectations. In a long-term analysis endovascular repair has shown an increase inmortalityat four or more years of follow-upandno significantdifference when compared to open repair (rates of death byany cause converged at two years, and aneurysm-relateddeaths, at six); moreover, the overall rates of graft-relatedcomplications and reinterventions were three to four timeshigher in theendovascular repair group (adjustedhazard ratio

    at six months to four years period of time was 7.92 forcomplications and 9.12 for reintervention, thus representingthemostcomplicatedperiod afterinitial intervention).

    And also, even though analysis has failed to completeevery data regarding costs, as the researchers did not includeoutpatient procedures, endovascular repair has shown to bemorecostly (differenceof $4,568).

    In conclusion, to overcome open cardiovascularsurgery at least regardingaorticaneurism, there is still a lot todevelop in endovascular procedures. Nonetheless, we can besure that there will always be more suitable indications for

    each type ofprocedure.

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators, GreenhalghRM, Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG, Epstein D,Sculpher MJ.Endovascularversusopen repairof abdominalaorticaneurysm.N Engl J Med.2010;362(20):1863-71.

    Gianini RJ. Ensaio clnico randomizado: verdadeiro ou falso?. Rev Fac Cinc MdSorocaba. 2010; 12(4):27-31.

    Pgina Linha Coluna Onde se l Leia-se:31 Quadro 3 Legenda *p=1-(1-0,05)x *p=1-(1-0,05)x29 Figura 2 - - a figura abaixo:

    Errata