15
The Mu2e Project, Commissioning, & Physics Schedule D. Glenzinski, J. Miller, R. Ray, J. Whitmore Proton Planning Group Meeting 01 December, 2016 01 December, 2016 D. Glenzinski FNAL PPMG 1

The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

The  Mu2e  Project,  Commissioning,  

&  Physics  ScheduleD.  Glenzinski,  J.  Miller,  R.  Ray,  J.  Whitmore

Proton  Planning  Group  Meeting01  December,  2016

01  December,  2016 D.  Glenzinski  -­‐ FNAL  PPMG 1

Page 2: The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

Prologue

• This  talk  aims  to:−Socialize  a  wider  audience  about  the  implications  decisions  in  the  past  have  had  on  the  Mu2e  Schedule  (Project  +  Commissioning  +  Physics)

−Highlight  the  effects  of  introducing  a  significant  delay  into  the  schedule          (e.g.  via  an  extended  accelerator  shutdown)

−Initiate  a  discussion  among  all  relevant  parties  to  arrive  at  a  program  plan  that  works  for  everyone  

01  December,  2016 D.  Glenzinski  -­‐ FNAL  PPMG 2

Page 3: The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

Prologue

• Mu2e  is  a  very  challenging  experiment− Aims  to  improve  current  state-­‐of-­‐the-­‐art  by  a  factor  of  104−Utilizes  a  novel  secondary  beamline  to  produce  the  world’s  hottest  stopped  muon  source  (currently  PSI  achieves  ~108 µ/s,  our  design  ~1010 µ/s)

−Utilizes  resonant  extraction  to  provide  a  pulsed  proton  beam−Requires  3  separate  superconducting  solenoids  to  work  in  unison−Requires  well  controlled,  narrow  (+/-­‐ 125  ns  full  width)  protons  pulses−Requires  out-­‐of-­‐time  protons  to  be  suppressed  by  1010 rel.  to  in-­‐time  protons  −Requires  high-­‐performance  detectors  working  in  vacuum  at  high  rates

• Mu2e  carries  significant  technical  risk−Some  are  captured  in  Project  Risk  Register;  managed  by  the  Project;  affects  Project  schedule−Some  are  captured  in  Operations  Risk  Register,  managed  by  the  Collab/Lab−We  anticipate  a  lengthy  Commissioning  period

01  December,  2016 D.  Glenzinski  -­‐ FNAL  PPMG 3

Page 4: The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

Concerning  the  Mu2e  Project  KPPs

• The  project  KPPs  require−Solenoids  powered  to  their  nominal  settings−Beamline  elements  installed  and  powered  to  their  nominal  settings−Detectors  to  have  collected  cosmic  ray  events  in  “garage”  position

• Thus,  at  Project  Complete−The  solenoids  have  not  yet  been  mapped  with  precision−Beam  has  not  yet  been  delivered  to  the  Mu2e  production  target−The  detectors  have  not  yet  operated  in  vacuum  with  beam−These  things  are  true  for  both  Threshold  and  Objective  KPPs

01  December,  2016 D.  Glenzinski  -­‐ FNAL  PPMG 4

Page 5: The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

Concerning  the  Mu2e  Project  KPPs

• The  project  KPPs  require−Solenoids  powered  to  their  nominal  settings−Beamline  elements  installed  and  powered  to  their  nominal  settings−Detectors  to  have  collected  cosmic  ray  events  in  “garage”  position

• Thus,  at  Project  Complete−The  solenoids  have  not  yet  been  mapped  with  precision−Beam  has  not  yet  been  delivered  to  the  Mu2e  production  target−The  detectors  have  not  yet  operated  in  vacuum  with  beam−These  things  are  true  for  both  Threshold  and  Objective  KPPs

01  December,  2016 D.  Glenzinski  -­‐ FNAL  PPMG 5

In  other  words:Project  Complete  !=  Experiment  Ready  for  Beam

Project  Complete  !=  Accelerator  Ready  to  Deliver  High  Quality  Beam  

Page 6: The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

What  Mu2e  looks  like  at  Project  Complete

01  December,  2016 D.  Glenzinski  -­‐ FNAL  PPMG 6

• Still  missing:  External  shielding  ( ~1000  tons,  100  blocks),  Overhead  hatch  shielding  (~2100  tons,  370  blocks),  Cosmic  Veto  System  (60  tons,  325  m2,  mounts  to  external  shielding),  Stopping  Target  Monitor  (installed  behind  DS),  Final  focus  region  of  the  beamline.  Tracker,  Calorimeter  in  “garage  position”.

Lower  Level

Page 7: The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

What  Mu2e  needs  to  look  like  prior  to  beam

• View  of  the  lower  level  – Ready  for  beam01  December,  2016 D.  Glenzinski  -­‐ FNAL  PPMG 7

Page 8: The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

What  Mu2e  needs  to  look  like  prior  to  beam

• View  of  the  upper  level  – showing  a  partial  installation  of  hatch  blocks01  December,  2016 D.  Glenzinski  -­‐ FNAL  PPMG 8

Page 9: The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

Mu2e  Schedule

• Project  schedule  from  P6  – currently  22  months  of  float  remain• Commissioning  schedule  – 12-­‐18  months  based  on  rough  estimate• Physics  schedule  – strawman  example

01  December,  2016 D.  Glenzinski  -­‐ FNAL  PPMG 9

Page 10: The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

Mu2e  Schedule  – Project  notes

• Taken  from  P6  scheduling  tool−Rigorously  planned,  resource  loaded,  matched  to  funding  profile,  etc.

• Generally  speaking,  Mu2e  project  has  3  distinct  paths  proceeding  in  parallel  (until  the  end  when  it  all  comes  together)−Fabrication  and  initial  commissioning  of  the  solenoids−Fabrication  and  initial  commissioning  of  the  detector  sub-­‐systems−Construction,  assembly,  and  initial  installation  of  beam  line  elements−A  significant  delay  in  any  one  of  these  can  push  “KPPs  Complete”  to  later  date

01  December,  2016 D.  Glenzinski  -­‐ FNAL  PPMG 10

Page 11: The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

Mu2e  Schedule  – Commissioning  notes  • Once  KPPs  are  achieved,  we  have  ~12  months  of  work  before  we’re  ready  to  deliver  beam  to  the  production  target.  Driven  by  2  separate  paths  proceeding  in  parallel:

1) Readying  the  Mu2e  apparatus  for  beam−Complete  precision  field  maps  à Final  alignment  of  the  solenoids  à Installation  of  external  shielding  à Final  installation  of  detector  systems  à Commissioning  in  vacuum

2) Readying  the  beam−Can  proceed  in  parallel  with  1)  by  utilizing  a  diagnostic  dump  upstream  of  Mu2e−Commission  single-­‐turn  extraction  to  diagnostic  dump  à Install  septa  and  associated  shielding  à Commission  resonant  extraction  to  diagnostic  dump  à Install  final  focus  region

−Commissioning  durations  reflect  the  technical  challenges  associated  with  achieving  the  required  performance  parameters

• Once  these  are  done  we  begin  commissioning  the  apparatus  with  beam  

• We  estimate  this  entire  sequence  has  a  +6  month  uncertainty  associated  with  it

01  December,  2016 D.  Glenzinski  -­‐ FNAL  PPMG 11

Page 12: The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

Mu2e  Schedule  – Physics  notes• To  achieve  our  target  sensitivity,  Mu2e  requires:

−7  x  1017 stopped  muons  on  our  aluminum  stopping  target−Using  latest  production  models,  this  requires  ~4  x  1020 POT  (on  tungsten  production  target)−This  takes  3  years  of  running  at  design  intensity  (assuming  2  x  107 s/yr of  run  time)−Special  runs  for  detector  calibration  and  background  studies  add  another  ~1  year  of  run  time

• Our  competition:−Current  world’s  best  limit  (Sindrum-­‐II):  Rµe <  6  x  10-­‐13 @  90%  CL−COMET  Phase-­‐I  expects  ~  6  x  10-­‐15 by  ~2021

• Not  including  the  additional  run  time  for  calibrations  and  background  studies:−Mu2e  achieves  a  Single-­‐event-­‐sensitivity  (SES)  of  ~10-­‐15 in  ~7  days  at  full  intensity−…  SES  of  ~10-­‐16 in  ~70  days  at  full  intensity−…  Target  sensitivity  of  ~10-­‐17 in  3y  of  running  (assuming  2  x  107 s/yr of  run  time)

• Physics  schedule  on  pg 9  assumes  no  problems  arise

01  December,  2016 D.  Glenzinski  -­‐ FNAL  PPMG 12

Page 13: The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

Mu2e  Schedule  – take  aways

• Mu2e  will  need  sustained  periods  of  uninterrupted  accelerator  run  time  to  commission  resonant  extraction  prior  to  delivering  beam  to  the  experiment−Currently  scheduled  to  begin  Q3  of  FY2020  and  end  Q4-­‐FY2021.

• Estimate  another  6  months  required  to  commission  beam  to  target  and  to  commission  detector  operations  with  beam−Currently  scheduled  Q1-­‐FY2022  – Q2-­‐FY2022

• Expect  Mu2e  physics  data  taking  to  begin  mid-­‐FY2022

01  December,  2016 D.  Glenzinski  -­‐ FNAL  PPMG 13

Page 14: The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

Mu2e  Schedule  – take  aways

• Mu2e  needs  4  years  at  full  intensity  to  achieve  target  sensitivity−3  years  of  physics  data  taking−+1  yr (33%)  additional  running  for  calibration  and  special  background  runs−There  are  intermediate  breakpoints  that  provide  datasets  sufficient  to  reach  interesting  intermediate  sensitivities

• Including  beam  commissioning,  detector  commissioning,  physics  data  taking  and  calibration  running,  Mu2e  will  need  beam  for  ~6  years.

• Mu2e  will  be  taking  data  into  the  latter  half  of  the  2020s−Schedule  on  pg 9  has  Mu2e  running  to  end  of  FY2026−Schedule  on  pg 9  assumes  no  significant  problems  arise  along  the  way

01  December,  2016 D.  Glenzinski  -­‐ FNAL  PPMG 14

Page 15: The$Mu2e$Project,$ Commissioning,$ &Physics$Schedule · −Some#are#captured#in#Project#Risk#Register;#managed#by#the#Project;#affects#Project#schedule −Some#are#captured#in#Operations#Risk#Register,#managed#by#the#Collab/Lab

Summary

• A  significant  accelerator  shutdown  in  the  early  2020s  coincides  with  final  Mu2e  beam  commissioning  and  first  physics  and  would  cause  a  significant  delay  in  obtaining  first  physics.

• A  significant  delay  in  obtaining  first  physics  would  be  extremely  disruptive−Especially  detrimental  for  Mu2e  graduate  students  and  post-­‐docs−Puts  us  at  a  disadvantage  relative  to  COMET−Having  made  significant  investments  in  Mu2e,  the  DOE,  our  International  Partners,  and  our  University  Colleagues  will  be  anxious  to  see  physics  results

• We  would  like  to  work  with  LBNF  &  laboratory  to  develop  a  solution  that  works  for  all  parties  involved

01  December,  2016 D.  Glenzinski  -­‐ FNAL  PPMG 15