Upload
hanae-william
View
9
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Transnational Social Question: From Social Protection to Social Inequalities. Thomas Faist Centre on Migration, Citizenship and Development (COMCAD), Department of Sociology Bielefeld University. The Transnational Social Question. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
The Transnational Social The Transnational Social Question:Question:
From Social Protection From Social Protection to Social Inequalities to Social Inequalities
Thomas FaistThomas Faist
Centre on Migration, Citizenship and Centre on Migration, Citizenship and Development (COMCAD), Department of Development (COMCAD), Department of
SociologySociology
Bielefeld UniversityBielefeld University
The Transnational Social The Transnational Social QuestionQuestion
Social QuestionSocial Question in the 19th century – in the 19th century – Transnational Social Question Transnational Social Question today? “Great today? “Great transformation“ transformation“ “second great “second great transformation“?transformation“?
Is there a transformation of mainly Is there a transformation of mainly national national social policysocial policy within welfare states to within welfare states to global global social policysocial policy in the 21st century? in the 21st century?
Increasing (perception of) global Increasing (perception of) global interdependencies: e.g. migration, military interdependencies: e.g. migration, military threats, environmental degradation, threats, environmental degradation, opportunity (such as professionals) -- and opportunity (such as professionals) -- and increasing awareness of global social increasing awareness of global social inequalities (e.g. MDG)inequalities (e.g. MDG)
Migration and Social Migration and Social ProtectionProtection
Migration can be seen as a form of social Migration can be seen as a form of social protectionprotection
Social protection provisioning is also important Social protection provisioning is also important for migrants due primarily to migrant-specific for migrants due primarily to migrant-specific vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities
Issues involve (a) the access of migrants to Issues involve (a) the access of migrants to basic social benefits in the immigration basic social benefits in the immigration country, (b) the portability of social security country, (b) the portability of social security benefits, specifically pensions and healthcare benefits, specifically pensions and healthcare benefits, once they return to their home benefits, once they return to their home country, and (c) non-state support structures country, and (c) non-state support structures consisting of migrant networks, associations, consisting of migrant networks, associations, etc.etc.
Social Inequalities andSocial Inequalities andTransnational Social Transnational Social
ProtectionProtection Social protection reduces risks and Social protection reduces risks and
thus thus decreases social inequalitiesdecreases social inequalities Social rights and social policies Social rights and social policies
stabilize stabilize welfare capitalismwelfare capitalism as a as a legitimate system of social inequality legitimate system of social inequality on the national levelon the national level
How does cross-border migration How does cross-border migration contribute to social protection and contribute to social protection and (re)produce social inequalities?(re)produce social inequalities?
ArgumentsArguments
Methodologicalical transnationalism: Methodologicalical transnationalism: Overcoming static approaches to Overcoming static approaches to social protection & inequality which social protection & inequality which focus on one frame onlyfocus on one frame only
Empirical finding: Transnational Empirical finding: Transnational social protection addresses global social protection addresses global social inequalities, yet social inequalities, yet creates new creates new forms of inequalitiesforms of inequalities in both in both emigration and immigration regionsemigration and immigration regions
OutlineOutline
Part 1: Approaching Transnational Part 1: Approaching Transnational Social ProtectionSocial Protection
Part 2: Universal Social Rights and Part 2: Universal Social Rights and Fragmented Welfare StatenessFragmented Welfare Stateness
Part 3: The Rise of Migrants as Part 3: The Rise of Migrants as Development Agents and Changing Development Agents and Changing Principles Social OrderPrinciples Social Order
Part 4: The (Re-)Production of Social Part 4: The (Re-)Production of Social InequalitiesInequalities
Part 1: Part 1:
Approaching Approaching TransnationalTransnational
Social ProtectionSocial Protection
The Optics AvailableThe Optics AvailableNational, World, National, World, Transnational Transnational
Analyses of National Welfare States Analyses of National Welfare States are often are often concerned with (a) integration of migrants and concerned with (a) integration of migrants and their children (social integration) and (b) their children (social integration) and (b) functionings of welfare state as such (e.g. functionings of welfare state as such (e.g. demography) (national systems integration)demography) (national systems integration)
Neo-institutionalist (world) theoriesNeo-institutionalist (world) theories are are interested in how world-cultural ontology interested in how world-cultural ontology spreads into international and national law, e.g. spreads into international and national law, e.g. social rights as human rightssocial rights as human rights
Transnational OpticTransnational Optic so far has been mostly so far has been mostly concerned with practices of migrants and their concerned with practices of migrants and their significant others – yet little consideration of significant others – yet little consideration of changing institutionschanging institutions
Transnational Transnational AssemblagesAssemblages
Institutional AssemblageInstitutional Assemblage of of differentiated forms of welfare differentiated forms of welfare stateness and other forms of social stateness and other forms of social protection – modern and traditional / protection – modern and traditional / informal and formalinformal and formal
Transnational lensTransnational lens: National/regional : National/regional systems of protection criss-crossed systems of protection criss-crossed transnational spaces as reference transnational spaces as reference pointspoints
Part 2: Part 2:
Universal Social Rights Universal Social Rights
and Fragmented and Fragmented Welfare StatenessWelfare Stateness
Social Rights as Human Social Rights as Human RightsRights
Social rightsSocial rights include those listed in the include those listed in the General Declaration ofGeneral Declaration of Human RightsHuman Rights (1948): Elementary school education, health (1948): Elementary school education, health care, minimum income, secure employment, care, minimum income, secure employment, right to collective organization in the right to collective organization in the workplace, food, shelter, social securityworkplace, food, shelter, social security
Specifications:Specifications: International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966), the Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989), and the European Charter of Fundamental Rights (2000)
Social Security in Global Social Security in Global PerspectivePerspective
Beyond welfare stateness and bilateral Beyond welfare stateness and bilateral treaties there is little treaties there is little redistributionredistribution; ; nonetheless, there is nonetheless, there is regulationregulation (e.g. (e.g. European Union); European Union);
Globally mostly Globally mostly „soft law“„soft law“, such as , such as corporate social responsibility, social corporate social responsibility, social labels, codes of conduct (e.g. Global labels, codes of conduct (e.g. Global Compact)Compact)
Adequate concepts? Social rights Adequate concepts? Social rights social standards social standards capabilities (Sen) capabilities (Sen)
A Global Perspective: A Global Perspective: Fragmented Welfare Fragmented Welfare
StatenessStateness (1) Welfare stateness is mostly restricted to (1) Welfare stateness is mostly restricted to
national welfare states in the national welfare states in the OECD countriesOECD countries (2) In so-called (2) In so-called NICsNICs often considerable often considerable
evolution over the past decades in “human evolution over the past decades in “human investment sectors“ (education, health); cp. investment sectors“ (education, health); cp. transformation countriestransformation countries
(3) In so-called (3) In so-called developing countriesdeveloping countries often often only available to very select groupsonly available to very select groups
(4) In (4) In marginalized regionsmarginalized regions high degrees of high degrees of existential insecurity (Hobbesian world)existential insecurity (Hobbesian world)
The Four Worlds of Social The Four Worlds of Social SecuritySecurity
World 1
OECD
World 2
NICs / Transforma-tion states
World 3
„Developing World“
World 4
„Margina-lized World“
Working population
75-90 70-90 Informal Activities: 30-50
Informal Activities: 70-90
Extent of union organization
25-50 30-50 5-15 n.a.
Public expenditure as percentage of GDP
35-45 30-40 20-30 10-25
Welfare expenditure as percentage of GDP
20-30 15-25 5-10 2-5
Towards a Global Towards a Global Social Policy Model?Social Policy Model?
1970s/80s: Structural adjustment policies 1970s/80s: Structural adjustment policies (Africa, Latin America, South Asia)(Africa, Latin America, South Asia)
Followed by “post-Washington consensus”Followed by “post-Washington consensus”(1) combination of a liberal market (1) combination of a liberal market approach with market-based insurance and approach with market-based insurance and targeted policies for the “poor/needy”targeted policies for the “poor/needy”(2) Social capital and local community, e.g. (2) Social capital and local community, e.g. empowerment, capabilitiesempowerment, capabilities
Part 3:Part 3:
The Rise of Migrants The Rise of Migrants as Development Agents as Development Agents
and Changing and Changing Principles Principles
of Social Order of Social Order
Connecting the Four Worlds: Connecting the Four Worlds: Transnational MigrationTransnational Migration
Transnational social policy - problems: Transnational social policy - problems: (awareness of) interdependencies, suprastatal (awareness of) interdependencies, suprastatal authority, belief in effective policiesauthority, belief in effective policies
Migration as a strategic research site for Migration as a strategic research site for transnational social protectiontransnational social protection
MigrantsMigrants connect various connect various ““worlds“ and scales: worlds“ and scales: (1) (1) AgentsAgents: persons, groups, organizations; : persons, groups, organizations; (2) (2) SystemsSystems: different social protection systems: different social protection systems
The Virtuous Circle of The Virtuous Circle of Migration and DevelopmentMigration and Development
Degree of Development
Rate of Migration
•Remittances (individual und collective)
• Investments•Transfer of human capital and social remittances
Changing Concepts of Changing Concepts of Social Order Social Order
Principles of Social Order:Principles of Social Order: Stateness, Market and Community & Civil SocietyStateness, Market and Community & Civil Society
Stateness and Civil SocietyStateness and Civil SocietyNational development state National development state combinations of local combinations of local state, civil society (NGOs) and international state, civil society (NGOs) and international organizations; also: organizations; also: co-développement, co-développement, diaspora, diaspora, transnational communitiestransnational communities
Market and Civil SocietyMarket and Civil Society„„Market citizen“ as well as participatory/ grass roots Market citizen“ as well as participatory/ grass roots approachesapproaches
Part 4:Part 4:
Social Protection and Social Protection and the the
(Re-)Production (Re-)Production of Social Inequalitiesof Social Inequalities
Social Protection and Social Protection and MigrationMigration
Single most important determinant of Single most important determinant of life chances is the place (legal life chances is the place (legal citizenship) where a person is borncitizenship) where a person is born
Social insecurity (existential) and Social insecurity (existential) and social security: migration may expand social security: migration may expand a person’s capabilities – livelihood a person’s capabilities – livelihood approach and new economics of approach and new economics of migrationmigration
Social Protection inSocial Protection inTransnational Social SpacesTransnational Social Spaces
StructureStructure: Combinations of functionally highly : Combinations of functionally highly differentiated institutions AND small groups and differentiated institutions AND small groups and networks (e.g. kinship groups, religious networks (e.g. kinship groups, religious communities)communities)
ResourcesResources: financial remittances; „social : financial remittances; „social remittances“ Nonetheless: „brain drain“ in certain remittances“ Nonetheless: „brain drain“ in certain sectorssectors
SectorsSectors: Central for social protection is remittances : Central for social protection is remittances in sectors such as health and education; in sectors such as health and education; construction and small manufacturingconstruction and small manufacturing
Institutional Institutional Arrangements Arrangements
Degree of FormalizationDegree of Formalization Low --------------------------- High
Friendship networks Families/housheolds/Kinship groups
Hometown Associations Cultural Associations Rotating Credit Associations Funeral Societies (based on reciprocity)
Issue Networks NGOs (INGOS, HRINGOS)
Religious Communities
STATES: Bi- and
supranational conventionsExtra-territorial
social rights
The (Re-)Production of The (Re-)Production of Social Inequalities: An Social Inequalities: An
ExampleExample
Transnational personal care services Transnational personal care services market linking social protection in market linking social protection in regions of origin and destination; e.g. regions of origin and destination; e.g. care migration Romania / Ukraine – Italycare migration Romania / Ukraine – Italy
““Care drain“/“social orphans“– Care drain“/“social orphans“– reorganization of care in immigration reorganization of care in immigration and emigration regions (kinship; market) and emigration regions (kinship; market) – problems: aged/children– problems: aged/children
Mechanisms Generating Mechanisms Generating Inequalities Inequalities
- Some Examples - - Some Examples - Social Social Formation/ Formation/
General General Social Social MechanismsMechanisms
Small Groups /Small Groups /
NetworksNetworks
- Relational -- Relational -
Societies/Societies/
Societal systems Societal systems
- Systemic -- Systemic -
Social Social closure: closure:
In-/exclusionIn-/exclusion
BelongingBelonging (e.g. (e.g. access to networks access to networks and jobs)and jobs)
Citizenship Citizenship (e.g. (e.g. irregular status; visa irregular status; visa free travel; free travel; „transnational“ „transnational“ citizenship)citizenship)
Social Social closure: closure: Opportunity Opportunity hoardinghoarding
CliquesCliques
(e.g. reciprocity in (e.g. reciprocity in friendship networks, friendship networks, kinship systems)kinship systems)
LobbyingLobbying
(e.g. policy (e.g. policy brokerage of social brokerage of social scientists)scientists)
ExploitationExploitation Working conditionsWorking conditions
(e.g. household work)(e.g. household work)RedistributionRedistribution (e.g. (e.g. skills and care drain: skills and care drain: extraction from extraction from sending to receiving sending to receiving regions)regions)
Future ResearchFuture Research
Questionable concept: Questionable concept: ““remittances“remittances“
Intersectional patterns of the Intersectional patterns of the generation of inequality: class-generation of inequality: class-ization, gender-ization, ethnic-izationization, gender-ization, ethnic-ization
Perspectival Social Perspectival Social InequalitiesInequalities
Empirical finding: Empirical finding: Social inequalities Social inequalities
(1) may increase on one scale (e.g. (1) may increase on one scale (e.g. household) but may decrease on another household) but may decrease on another (e.g. regions)(e.g. regions)
(2) different positions in various contexts (2) different positions in various contexts (emigration vs. immigration) and (emigration vs. immigration) and transnational reference systemtransnational reference system
Normative question: Tolerate “small Normative question: Tolerate “small inequalities“ to address “bigger inequalities“ to address “bigger inequalities“?inequalities“?
THANK YOU FOR YOUR THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTIONATTENTION