7
The Teaching-Learning (TL) Maturity Model © D M Dhamdhere, 2014

The Teaching-Learning (TL) Maturity Model © D M Dhamdhere, 2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Teaching-Learning (TL) Maturity Model © D M Dhamdhere, 2014

The Teaching-Learning (TL) Maturity Model

© D M Dhamdhere, 2014

Page 2: The Teaching-Learning (TL) Maturity Model © D M Dhamdhere, 2014

Parameters and Scale

• A 7-point scale for each parameter– Oblivious (0),

– Sparsely / Fully Aware (SA / FA: 1 / 2)

– Sparsely / Fully Enabled (SE / FE: 3 / 4)

– Sparsely / Fully Integrated (SI / FI: 5 / 6)

• Teaching scale– Aware: Aware of fundamentals of good teaching

– Enabled: Know active learning techniques and course planning

– Integrated: Practice active learning techniques and course planning

• Learning scale– Aware: Aware of fundamentals of good learning

– Enabled: Can learn effectively, if made to

– Integrated: Will automatically learn effectively

Page 3: The Teaching-Learning (TL) Maturity Model © D M Dhamdhere, 2014

Parameters and Scale

• We would have to decide on the cutoffs for the sparse/full classifications for the awareness, enablement and integration parameters.

• Sample values

Sparse Full

Awareness 30-70% >70%

Enablement 30-70% >70%

Integration 20-60% >60%

Page 4: The Teaching-Learning (TL) Maturity Model © D M Dhamdhere, 2014

TL Maturity Level

• The teaching-learning (TL) maturity of an educational institution is a pair: teaching level – learning level, where each level is in the 7-point scale

• TL Maturity level of the institution is indicated by lower number in the pair

TL maturity Maturity level

0-0, 1-0 0 1-1, 2-1 1 2-2, 3-2 2 3-3, 4-3 3 4-4, 5-4 4 5-5, 6-5 5 6-6 6

Page 5: The Teaching-Learning (TL) Maturity Model © D M Dhamdhere, 2014

TL Maturity Level

• The teaching-learning (TL) maturity of an educational institution is a pair: teaching level – learning level, where each level is in the 7-point scale

• TL Maturity level of the institution is indicated by lower number in the pair

TL maturity Maturity level Wishful time estimate

0-0, 1-0 0 Presently 1-1, 2-1 1 2015-16 2-2, 3-2 2 2016-17 3-3, 4-3 3 2017-18 4-4, 5-4 4 2018-19 5-5, 6-5 5 6-6 6

Five-yearPlan !

Page 6: The Teaching-Learning (TL) Maturity Model © D M Dhamdhere, 2014

Separate UG and PG maturity?

• In one year’s experience at FAC, PG students were seen to take more interest in knowing about effectiveness of learning– Hence higher maturity levels could be achieved for PG

programmes

Page 7: The Teaching-Learning (TL) Maturity Model © D M Dhamdhere, 2014

The Maturity Levels

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Teaching O SA FA SE FE SI FI

Learning O O SA SA SA FE E

Planning O O O O O SA E

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Teaching awareness program (TAP)

Teaching workshop (TW)

Learning awareness program (LAP)

Learning workshop (LW)

Course planning workshop (CPW)

0→1,2.

2→3. TL not effective

S good teaching

S good teaching & learning