18
The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea? Raul Bernal Constantin Sabet d’Acre

The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

  • Upload
    alyn

  • View
    93

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?. Raul Bernal Constantin Sabet d’Acre. Location Location Location. Our Journey. Who wants what and why Why it’s important Strategic Interests of China and the US Potential for conflict. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

The Spratly Islands:Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

Raul BernalConstantin Sabet d’Acre

Page 2: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

• Location

• Location

• Location

Page 3: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

Our Journey• Who wants what and why• Why it’s important• Strategic Interests of China and the

US• Potential for conflict

Page 4: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

Territorial Claims over the South China Seas, Part I

• The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Seas (UNCLOS)

• Claims based on UNCLOS– Brunei– Malaysia

Page 5: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?
Page 6: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

Territorial Claims over the South China Seas, II

• Based on history– People’s Republic of China– Taiwan

• Based on mix of history and UNCLOS– Philippines– Vietnam

• Other concerned party: Indonesia

Page 7: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?
Page 8: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

Driving Forces of Interest• Strategic position in terms of security

• Economic importance– Shipping lanes– Oil and gas– Fishing and manure

Page 9: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

Oil Flows and Transports

Page 10: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

Driving Forces of Interest• Strategic position in terms of security

• Economic importance– Shipping lanes– Oil and gas– Fishing and manure

Page 11: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

Perceptions of China in SE Asia

• Historical mistrust of China

• Rapid change in attitudes in the past 5-10 years

• Reengagement with Southeast Asia

• Economic benefits, but many still skeptical of long-term ambitions

Page 12: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

China’s Conduct in the SCS• 1974 – Paracel Islands seized• 1992 – Territorial expansion law• 1995 – Seizure of Mischief Reef• 2002 – Conduct of Parties in SCS• 2005 – Joint seismic survey• 2010 – Chinese fishing patrols

Source: www.spratlys.org

Page 13: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?
Page 14: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

China’s Strategic Interests• Access to natural resources

• Control of sea lanes

• Projection of military force

• Extended regional influenceSource: PRC Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Page 15: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

US Strategic Interests• Counter Chinese influence

• Security of sea lanes

• Military access

• Counterterrorism effortsSource: US Defense Department

Page 16: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

Potential for US-China Conflict• US disengagement and “benign neglect” of

SE Asia

• Oil exploration by US companies

• 2001 – Spy plane incident

• 2002 – USS Bowditch

• 2009 – USNS Impeccable

Page 17: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

USNS Impeccable Incident• Sonar and mapping

ship operating within China’s EEZ

• Surrounded by several Chinese vessels

• Chinese submarine base at Hainan island

• US responds with Aegis Class Destroyer (USS Chung-Hoon)

Source: Jane’s Intelligence Review

Page 18: The Spratly Islands: Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea?

Analysis• US:

– not taking sides on sovereignty issues– but concerned with increasing Chinese influence

and military power in the region• China:

– becoming more assertive in territorial claims despite increasing regional integration

• ASEAN:– desires closer economic ties with China– but engages the US as a hedge against Chinese

influence