69
The safety effects of crosslinked polymers in wire & cable applications h Cables 2012 AMI Ron Goethals Inhol bv, The Netherlands www.inhol.com Miami, USA, April 18 & 19, 2012

The safety effects of crosslinked polymers in wire & cable ... · PDF fileThe safety effects of crosslinked polymers in wire & cable applications AMI hCables 2012 Ron Goethals Inhol

  • Upload
    vobao

  • View
    221

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

The safety effects of crosslinked polymers

in wire & cable applications

h Cables 2012

AMI

Ron Goethals

Inhol bv, The Netherlands

www.inhol.com

Miami, USA, April 18 & 19, 2012

h Cables 2012

AMI

Main topics

- What is crosslinking?

- A comparison of the 3 main XL-systems in the W & C industry.

- Why can crosslinking make the world safer?

- Global geographical trends in W & C crosslinking.

- Conclusion

The safety effects of crosslinked

polymers in wire & cable applications

h Cables 2012

AMI

Main topics

- What is crosslinking?

\

Definition (Wikipedia):

“When polymer chains are linked together by cross-links, they

lose some of their ability to move as individual polymer chains”

The safety effects of crosslinked

polymers in wire & cable applications

h Cables 2012

AMI

Main topics

- What is crosslinking?

\

Creating a 3-dimensional

polymer network

A simple answer is:

The safety effects of crosslinked

polymers in wire & cable applications

h Cables 2012

AMI

How is crosslinking achieved in the wire & cable industry?

A comparison of the 3 main crosslink systems

* E-beam (or radiation) crosslinking

* CV (or chemical) crosslinking

* Silane (or moisture) crosslinking

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

h Cables 2012

AMI

How is crosslinking achieved in the wire & cable industry?

A comparison of the 3 main crosslink systems

* Description / Explanation

* Chemistry

* Advantages & Disadvantages

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking

• Resulting in:

Formation of carbon-to- carbon bonds (-C-C-) between adjacent polymer molecules.

• High energy electrons collide with polymer molecules

Picture: By courtesy of Beta-Gamma-Service (D)

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking

(Target)

(Electron source)

E-beam accelerators work on the same principle as an (old) television!

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

(accelerator)

40

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking

(Electron source) (Electron source)

(accelerator)

(Target

= cable)

E-beam accelerators work on the same principle as an (old) television!

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

(accelerator)

(Target) Scan horn

25 kV

500 – 5000 kV

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking

Photo: Reidar Hahn, Fermilab

Scan horn

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

Picture: By courtesy of IBA (B)

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking

Photo: Reidar Hahn, Fermilab

The wire is ‘passing’ the

e-beam many times

Depending on f.i.:

- wire size & wall thickness

- speed

- required homogenity

- power of the e-beam (mA)

- ‘crosslink-degree’ needed

the number of passes

can be adapted.

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking

Photo: Reidar Hahn, Fermilab

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

Under Beam Handling System (=

rotating drums / conveyor system)

The so-called ‘Figure-8’

handling system.

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking

The wire is ‘passing’ the

e-beam many times

Depending on f.i.:

- wire size & wall thickness

- speed

- required homogenity

- power of the e-beam (mA)

- ‘crosslink-degree’ needed

the number of passes

can be adapted.

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

Absorbed dose

after 1 pass

Absorbed dose

after 8 passes

Scan horn

Homogenous crosslinked

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking

• Machine Energy (= Voltage):

Defines penetration or max. wall thickness

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

3 Characteristics are of main-importance in this crosslink process:

h Cables 2012

AMI

• E-beam (or irradiation)

crosslinking: Penetration

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

WT

This is defining the actual required beam-voltage.

E-beam WT = “actual” Wall Thicknes

Chordal length = “effective” Wall Thickness

d

OD Chordal Length = CL

Note: The chordal length can be calculated with mathematics (‘Pythagoras’ ).

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

2 examples of the required energy (= Voltage) for a defined cable size

Jacket

Density g/cc 1,6

Wall thickness mm 2,5

OD mm 60

Chordal length mm 12,0

Required Energy MeV 4,1

Quiet

some

difference!

Density g/cc 1,6

Wall thickness mm 2,5

OD mm 12

Chordal length mm 4,9

Required Energy MeV 1,9

OD = 12 mm OD = 12 mm

Same wall-thickness , but totally different Voltaqes required!

Note: by increasing the number of passes and sufficient twisting of the cable, the energy in praxis may be lower

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking

• Machine Energy (= Voltage):

Defines penetration or max. wall thickness

• Dosage

Higher dosage more crosslinks per cm3

Typical in wire & cable : 50 – 250 kGy ( 5 – 25 Mrad)

• Machine Current (= Amperage)

Defines throughput or speed

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

3 Characteristics are of main-importance in this crosslink process:

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking

Advantages

• In use since the 1950’s

• Highly reliable

• X-linking time : milliseconds

• Applicable on wide range

of polymers

• Dry process (no water)

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking

More advantages

• Easier compound formulation

• Environmental friendly (= TV)

• Easy to modify crosslink-degree

• Clean process

• No scorching during extrusion

•Wall-thicknesses up to 250-350 mil

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking

Special building (concrete bunker) is required.

Note: Self-shielded e-beams (< 0,8 MeV) are available.

‘Capital intensive’ underbeam handling equipment is needed

Rather highly skilled engineers shall be available

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

Disadvantages

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking

High initial investment (indication : 1,0 – 3,0 Million $)

At a 20 year lifetime and 75% capacity : Depreciation of

approx. $ 16 / used hr

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

Disadvantages

Is this really high ?

This is approximately: 0,0002 $ (= 0,02 $-cent) p/ft!

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking

High initial investment (indication : 1,0 – 3,0 Million $)

At a 20 year lifetime and 75% capacity : Depreciation of

approx. $ 16 / used hr

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

Disadvantages

Is this really high ?

This is approximately: 0,0002 $ (= 0,02 $-cent) p/ft!

Even if you include a building of 2 million Euro, reduce

the depreciation period (20 years) down to 10 years and

the actual capacity (75%) down to 50%, the depreciation

will be around $ 96/ used hr:

which means 0,0012 $ (= 0,12 $ cent) p/ft

(at an average speed of 1100 ft/minute)

h Cables 2012

AMI

Let’s have a look at the crosslink-costs per kg or lbs

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

225 kW (3 MeV x 75 mA)

1134 kg / hr (= 2498 lbs / hr)

9934 ton / year (= 21.9 million lbs / year)

70%

Another calculation crosslink costs per kg (lbs)

Depriciation costs (10 years) of building + beam : $ 96,-- / hr

Electricity cost of the e-beam : Euro 0,10/kw : $ 22,50/hr

Process engineer : $ 30,--/hr

Other costs (maintenance, others) : $ 10,--/hr

$ 131,50/hr

Efficiency factor Power of beam

Required dose

Typical Example

(seconds)

(3 shifts/365 days)

100 kGy

Capacity:

h Cables 2012

AMI Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

225 kW (3 MeV x 75 mA)

1134 kg / hr (= 2498 lbs / hr)

9934 ton / year (= 21.9 million lbs / year)

70%

Another calculation crosslink costs per kg (lbs)

Depriciation costs (10 years) of building + beam : $ 96,-- / hr

Electricity cost of the e-beam : Euro 0,10/kw : $ 22,50/hr

Process engineer : $ 30,--/hr

Other costs (maintenance, others) : $ 10,--/hr

$ 131,50/hr

Efficiency factor Power of beam

Required dose

Typical Example

(seconds)

(3 shifts/365 days)

100 kGy

Capacity:

But just look at the 2 numbers below:

h Cables 2012

AMI Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

225 kW (3 MeV x 75 mA)

70%

Depriciation costs (10 years) of building + beam : $ 96,-- / hr

Electricity cost of the e-beam : Euro 0,10/kw : $ 22,50/hr

Process engineer : $ 30,--/hr

Other costs (maintenance, others) : $ 10,--/hr

$ 131,50/hr

$ 0,05 / lbs

Typical Example

(seconds)

100 kGy

Power of beam Efficiency factor

Required dose

Another calculation crosslink costs per kg (lbs)

1134 kg / hr (= 2498 lbs / hr)

9934 ton / year (= 21.9 million lbs / year)

(3 shifts/365 days)

= $ 0,05/lbs

High initial investment (indication : 1,0 – 3,0 Million $)

The question was: Is this really high ?

$ 0,05/lbs

$ 0,0002/feet What do you think?

For those factories who do not want to invest (yet), please note:

specialized radiation centers sell their e-beam radiation services to the market.

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam (or irradiation) crosslinking : The chemistry

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

The chemistry

G. Gielenz, SPE - 2003

‘ ‘

h Cables 2012

AMI

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

* E-beam radiation misunderstandings

* Due to high levels of X-rays produced during the

E-Beam processing.........

X-rays?

Please…

explain!

Braking Heat!

80

h Cables 2012

AMI

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

* E-beam radiation misunderstandings

* Due to high levels of X-rays produced during the

E-Beam processing.........

X-rays?

Please…

explain!

Braking Heat!

h Cables 2012

AMI

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

* E-beam radiation misunderstandings

* Due to high levels of X-rays produced during the

E-Beam processing.........

X-rays?

Please…

explain!

Braking

X-rays

E-beam Radiation

Also known as: “Bremsstrahlung”

Production of

‘Bremsstrahlung’

when an electron

decelerates through

interaction with an

atom

h Cables 2012

AMI

Picture: By courtesy of IBA (B)

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

Heavy wall

‘bunker’

thick

concrete walls

* E-beam radiation misunderstandings

* Due to high levels of X-rays produced during the

E-Beam processing, the equipment is shielded by

thick layers of concrete and steel or lead.

Heavy wall

‘bunker’

thick

concrete walls

X-rays?

Please…

explain!

Thick

walls

h Cables 2012

AMI

* E-beam radiation misunderstandings

• When the beam is switched off … NO X-rays are

produced any more, and NO RESIDUAL X-rays are

left.

(This is like :

- switching off your television-set, as mentioned before.

- having a picture made of your teeth at your dentist.)

* Products are NOT made radioactive

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

More misunderstandings to clear

h Cables 2012

AMI

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

*Silane (or moisture) crosslinking

h Cables 2012

AMI

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

*Silane (or moisture) crosslinking

Extrude and WAIT… that is all!

h Cables 2012

AMI

*Silane (or moisture) crosslinking

Polyethylene

Mechanism:

+ Silane

Si (OMe)

Peroxide 1.Step: Grafting

Humidity

Catalyst Si

O

Si

Crosslinked PE

(XLPE)

2.Step:

Crosslinking

Si(OMe)3

Grafted PE-Compound

3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Also available Silane-Co-Polymers : Silane incorporated in the backbone)

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

*Silane (or moisture) crosslinking

Polyethylene

Mechanism:

+ Silane

Si (OMe)

Peroxide 1.Step: Grafting

Humidity

Catalyst Si

O

Si

Crosslinked PE

(XLPE)

2.Step:

Crosslinking

Si(OMe)3

Grafted PE-Compound

3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Also available Silane-Co-Polymers : Silane incorporated in the backbone)

Chemistry :

• Cross-linking through a C-Si-O-Si-C ‘bond’ (= link)

• This bond is more flexible compared to the C-C

bond of E-beam and CV-crosslinking.

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

Advantages:

• Low initial investment required

• Easy understandable technology

• Small batches can be made rather efficiently (Sioplas, Silane co-polymers)

• Steam, hot water or the open air will do the XL job

• ‘In house’ crosslinking (both Monosil, Sioplas and Silane co-polymers)

• No scientific- or highly-skilled people required

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

Advantages:

• Low crosslinking costs

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

In ambient environment : $ 0,00 / lbs

In ‘sauna’ environment :

Typically in the range $ 0,02 – 0,06 / lbs, for heating

h Cables 2012

AMI

Disadvantages:

• Higher compound costs (lower output during compounding)

• Complexity in compound design

• Only limited to a small number of polymers (mainly PE – kind )

• Limited storage life of the compounds

• More tight tolerances in extrusion parameters

• Risk of premature crosslinking (due to moisture and design of head and tooling)

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

Disadvantages:

• Risk of premature crosslinking ( f.i. due to pre-crosslinking during compound production or due to moisture pick-up during extrusion or design of head and tooling)

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

Disadvantages:

• Hardly any influence on crosslink degree (if Sioplas or silane-copolymers outside sources are converted)

• Rather long crosslink times (typically 24 hrs (hot sauna) to several weeks (ambient) Hot-set elongation tests needed)

• If tested before FULL crosslinking has occured, some

unexpected results may show up (think about heat-ageing)

• Decrease of MFI during storage. This may effect

output of extrusion line and surface of extruded product

• Mainly applicable in rather thin wall (< 80 - 120 mil) cables

h Cables 2012

AMI

* CV (or chemical) crosslinking How does it work?

• Step 1:

The compound is plasticized and extruded as insulation or jacket.

Step 2:

The cable is then fed into a long metal tube, which is pressurized

in an environment of steam (= wet) or nitrogen (=dry) to achieve

high temperatures, for increased crosslinking speed.

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

* CV (or chemical) crosslinking How does it work?

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

* CV (or chemical) crosslinking How does it work?

Extruder-area

Pressurized vulcanization tube (Temperatures of well above 200 C / 400 F)

Cooling Insulated

conductor

Conductor

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

* CV (or chemical) crosslinking

Long (pressurized) tubes (These can be as long as 100 m or more)

How does it work?

These tubes can be

as long as 350 ft

(or even longer!)

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

* CV (or chemical) crosslinking

Long (pressurized) tubes (These can be as long as 100 m or more)

How does it work?

These tubes can

be as long as 100

m (or more!). Extruder area

Picture:

by courtesy of Maillefer (CH)

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

Take-up

Cable

h Cables 2012

AMI

Heat

1) R-O-O-R ----> 2 R-O *

2) --- CH2 - CH2 – CH2 ---- + R-O * --- CH2 - CH – CH2 ---- + R-O-H

*

3) --- CH2 - CH – CH2 ---- --- CH2 - CH – CH2 ----

* |

* --- CH2 - CH – CH2 ----

--- CH2 - CH – CH2 ----

2 polymeric radicals recombine

to form a C-C bond (= crosslink)

(the peroxide is split in radicals (*) at elevated T)

(polymer + peroxide radical react) (polymer radical is created)

* CV (or chemical) crosslinking : The chemistry

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

• Well proven since the 1960’s

• (Rather) Easy understandable technology

• A limited, but reasonable, range of polymers available

• Reliable

•‘In-house’ crosslinking, which is ready after take-up

•Thick wall cables can be crosslinked

Advantages

* CV (or chemical) crosslinking

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

Disadvantages

• High initial investment needed (a complete line can cost as much as $ 1,5 – 2,0 million. This can be compared

with e-beam costs and thus depreciation levels.)

* Large area (m²) required

• Some complexity in compound design

• High pressure and high processing temperatures may

melt, flow, crush or fuse internal components of the cable

* CV (or chemical) crosslinking

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

Disadvantages

• Less favourable for small size wires/cables (mainly due to the reduced strength of the processed wire/cable)

• Risk of premature-crosslinking in the extruder

• Rather complex production lines (incl. Nitrogen handling system)

• Power consumption is typically in the 500 – 1000 kVA range,

which is a factor 2 – 6 times higher compared to an e-beam.

The crosslink-costs (incl. depreciation) will be in the same range

as an e-beam.

* CV (or chemical) crosslinking

Comparison of 3 crosslink systems

Description / Explanation

h Cables 2012

AMI

\

Heat

Heat

Thermoplastic

Crosslinked

The individual polymer chains

start to ‘move’’ (= melting!).

The individual polymer chains

can hardly ‘move’(= no melting!)

Some major safety effects of crosslinked wire & cable are :

No melting

The safety effects of crosslinked

polymers in wire & cable applications

h Cables 2012

AMI

Some major safety effects of crosslinked wire & cable are :

No melting

NO short-circuits due to melting of the insulation of the wire,

therefore keeping electrical circuits and functioning of electrical

systems in place.

F.i. in area’s like: elevators, large public buildings, such as

theatres, schools, universities, stadiums and airports, mines,

ferries, etc.

A ‘simple PE’ , with a melting point of

around 90 -110 °C, can easily withstand

temperatures up to 250 °C for several

hours without melting, after it has been

properly crosslinked!

Result:

Allowing people to escape and thus makes our world safer!

The safety effects of crosslinked

polymers in wire & cable applications

h Cables 2012

AMI

Some major safety effects of crosslinked wire & cable are :

Improved heat resistance

Reduced risk of short-circuits due to mechanical pressure /cut

through at elevated temperatures on the insulation of the wire .

This results in keeping electrical circuits and functioning of

electrical systems in place and reduce the start of a fire due to

‘electrical sparking’ of a short-circuit.. and

thus makes our world safer!

The safety effects of crosslinked

polymers in wire & cable applications

h Cables 2012

AMI

Some major safety effects of crosslinked wire & cable are :

Improved fluid and oil resistance

- Crosslinking keeps the mechanical properties after fluid immersion at

higher levels, due to its 3-dimensional structure,

Elongation at break

T

e

n

s

i

l

e

10

10

5

15

Non-crosslinked jacket, IRM 902 oil immersion

96 hrs @ 100 C

Crosslinked jacket, IRM 902 oil immersion

96 hrs @ 100 C

The safety effects of crosslinked

polymers in wire & cable applications

h Cables 2012

AMI

Some major safety effects of crosslinked wire & cable are :

Improved fluid and oil resistance

- Crosslinking gives a reduced swell of the insulation and jacket

a and keeps the mechanical properties at higher levels

Swelling due to oil

Swollen cables may lose :

- Mechanical properties, and

- Electrical properties

and thus …. lose safe conditions !

This results in keeping electrical circuits and functioning of electrical systems in

place and

thus makes our world safer!

The safety effects of crosslinked

polymers in wire & cable applications

h Cables 2012

AMI

Some major safety effects of crosslinked wire & cable are :

Improved stress crack resistance

Cracks after

heat shock @ 136°C

Non-crosslinked insulation Crosslinked insulation

NO cracks after

heat shock @ 250°C

This results in keeping electrical circuits and functioning of electrical systems in

place and

thus makes our world safer!

Pictures by courtesy of Habia

The safety effects of crosslinked

polymers in wire & cable applications

h Cables 2012

AMI

Reduced wallthicknesses possible

Some major safety effects of crosslinked wire & cable are :

…. Due to improved abrasion resistance

(Non-halogen automotive

wire, acc. LV 112 Class C)

Non-crosslinked Crosslinked

(120 kGy)

Abrasion resistance

(Cycles) 315 971

This results in reduced wallthicknesses for wire & cables on ships, vessels,

cars, trains, aeroplanes and other transportation systems.

This reduces the weight and therefore the fuel consumption and CO2

production and

thus makes our world safer!

The safety effects of crosslinked

polymers in wire & cable applications

h Cables 2012

AMI

Slide 1/

Non flame-retarded PE

Horizontal LSFOH polyolefin

(standing direction)

Vertical LSFOH polyolefin

Horizontal LSFOH polyolefin

(flat direction)

Video of burning of

non-crosslinked and

crosslinked samples

The safety effects of crosslinked

polymers in wire & cable applications

h Cables 2012

AMI Crosslinking and the safety effects of

crosslinked wire & cables

Some major safety effects of crosslinked wire & cable are :

Reduced or no dripping during burning

This results in reduced flame-spread

thus makes our world safer!

h Cables 2012

AMI

Increaing

Radiation dose

Gelc

on

ten

t

High

Low

High

Low

Low High

Correlation between hot-set-elongation and gel content

For every unique compound on a specific wire or cable,

the hot-set-elongation is an excellent tool to rapidly correlate

to a gel-content, provided a ‘calibration graph’ has been made.

Ho

t-set-

elo

ng

ati

on

* Measuring the hot-set-elongation

The safety effects of crosslinked

polymers in wire & cable applications

h Cables 2012

AMI

Increaing

Radiation dose

Gelc

on

ten

t

High

Low

High

Low

Low High

Correlation between hot-set-elongation and gel content

For every unique compound on a specific wire or cable,

the hot-set-elongation is an excellent tool to rapidly correlate

to a gel-content, provided a ‘calibration graph’ has been made.

Ho

t-set-

elo

ng

ati

on

* Measuring the hot-set-elongation

Laser

Can be

connected

to PC

The safety effects of crosslinked

polymers in wire & cable applications

h Cables 2012

AMI

USA + Canada

+ Mexico

Around

100 - 150

Around 275 -350 Around

400 - 500

Europe

Rest Around

100

Number of CV-lines for wire & cable and related industries (incl.

heat-shrinkable tubing)

Asia, incl. China

Global geographical trends

in W & C crosslinking

There is some growth in the # of

CV-lines in USA, as USA is

importing less MV- & HV-Cables.

Info: Maillefer, February 2012

h Cables 2012

AMI

USA + Canada

+ Mexico

Around

100

Around

175 Around

225

Europe

Rest Around

100

Number of “Silane-lines” for wire & cable and related industries

(incl. heat-shrinkable tubing).

Asia, incl. China

Global geographical trends

in W & C crosslinking

h Cables 2012

AMI

USA + Canada

+ Mexico

Around

40

Number of e-beams for the wire & cable related industries (incl.

heat-shrinkable tubing) and incl. beams at e-beam radiation centers

Around

40

Europe Asia, incl. China

Around

300!

Global geographical trends

in W & C crosslinking

Of which

around 250

in China

Rest Around

25

h Cables 2012

AMI

USA + Canada

+ Mexico

Around 240-290

Around

500- 550

Asia, incl. China

Around 875 - 975

Europe

Rest Around 200 - 250

TOTAL Number of XL-lines for wire & cable and related industries

Global geographical trends

in W & C crosslinking

General total :

around 1800 – 2100 XL-lines

h Cables 2012

AMI

XL-lines for wire & cable and related industries

Global geographical trends

in W & C crosslinking

Global geographical trends in W & C crosslinking

The number of CV-lines in USA is gradually increasing

The number of E-beams in China is dramatically increasing

What is the reason?

h Cables 2012

AMI

Around 200

Around

300- 350

Asia, incl. China

Around 450 - 500

Growth of number of e-beams in China

Global geographical trends

in W & C crosslinking

There is a much stronger growth in E-beams in China than elsewhere.

Reasons:

- There is a chinese manufacturer of e-beams, building approx. 1 e-beam

every 2 – 3 weeks (!) at low cost for use in the chinese market.

- Chinese factories tend to choose the most versatile system. The

philosophy behind this is: “Start with the best system from day one”.

- In Europe and USA, most (conservative) cable factories tend to keep using

their ‘existing technologies’. This is different in China.

- In Europe and USA, there is still the idea that an e-beam is ‘magic’ and

expensive. This is different in China.

- In Europe and USA, many authorities ( incl.city governments,

are ‘afraid’ of e-beams (due to lack of knowledge) and often come with

lots of barriers for companies, who want to install an e-beam.

This is different in China.

h Cables 2012

AMI

XL-lines for wire & cable and related industries

Global geographical trends

in W & C crosslinking

Global geographical trends in W & C crosslinking

The number of CV-lines in USA is gradually increasing

The number of E-beams in China is dramatically increasing

The total number of ‘crosslink lines (e-beam, CV, Silane)’ is

increasing

Approximately 50% of all XL-lines can be found in the Far East

h Cables 2012

AMI Crosslinking and the safety effects of

crosslinked wire & cables

Conclusions:

Crosslinked cables contribute to our safety.

There is a steady growth in cable crosslinking systems

Therefore:

Think : Crosslink