39
The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System. Suggested Faculty Professional Development “Sequence” for DH/PD. Learning Objectives for this Session. After completing this session you should be able to… - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC

Faculty Evaluation System

Page 2: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Suggested Faculty Professional Development “Sequence” for DH/PD

Roles of DH/PDs in GRCC’s Faculty Evaluation System

Developing FPE Plans & Reports

Developing Substantive Projects

Understanding Teaching and

Assessment Projects in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Page 3: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Learning Objectives for this Session

After completing this session you should be able to…1. Articulate the philosophy behind the faculty evaluation

system2. Describe the components of the system3. Describe the Satisfactory Standards of Employment (SSE) and

Yearly Distribution Requirements (YDR)4. Describe the basic requirements for tenure, promotion and

merit

Page 4: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Learning Objectives (continued)

After completing this session you should be able to…5. Describe the timeline for annual documentation and the

multi-year timeline for merit increases and promotion6. Identify the responsibilities of PD/DH in the evaluation

process7. Identify characteristics of a strong substantive project8. Identify the characteristics of properly written FPE Plans and

Reports

Page 5: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Learning Objectives (continued)

After completing this session you should be able to…9. Identify the behaviors that characterize effective instruction 10. Deliver feedback in a constructive, appropriate manner 11. Properly complete a Faculty Observation Report Form 12. Describe the proportional requirements for merit and rank

for 2013-2014

Page 6: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Philosophy

• Recruit and retain highly qualified faculty• Reward exemplary faculty• Improve student learning• Promote excellence in teaching and learning• Allow for collegiality• Improve institutional quality

Page 7: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Satisfactory Standards of Employment (SSE)*SSE Refers to the standard that each full-time tenured faculty member at GRCC has to meet in order to maintain ongoing employment. SSE:

• Must be met every year• Are used for those full-time tenured faculty not seeking rank or merit increases• Must be indicated on Faculty Performance Evaluation plan (FPE) form

*Refer to p.2 in MOU, Faculty Evaluation System

Page 8: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Yearly Distribution Requirements (YDR)*Refers to the standard that each full-time non-tenured and temporary faculty member has to meet in order to maintain ongoing employment. YDR:

• Also refers to the standard that each tenured faculty has to meet to achieve merit and progress in rank.

• Is followed by those faculty seeking rank and/or merit increases; for non-tenure FT faculty; for FT temporary faculty

• Must be indicated on Faculty Performance Evaluation plan (FPE) form

*refer to p.3 in MOU, Faculty Evaluation System

Page 9: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Components of Faculty Evaluation System

Teaching

Student Service

Community Service

(optional)

Professional Developmen

t

College Service

Page 10: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

TeachingYearly Distribution

Requirements*

• All teaching observations completed

• All student evaluations completed

• One project to assess student learning

• One project to improve teaching effectiveness

* refer to p 4 in MOU, Faculty Evaluation System

Satisfactory Standards of Employment*

• All teaching observations completed

• All student evaluations completed

• One project to assess student learning

* refer to p 2 in MOU, Faculty Evaluation System

Page 11: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

College ServiceYearly Distribution

Requirements

• 30 clock hours of service / year• Can do in summer…..• …but not required to do in

summer• Must include:

o 1 departmental level activity

o and 1 interdepartmental activity

*refer to p 4 in MOU, Faculty Evaluation System

Satisfactory Standards of Employment

• 15 clock hours of service / year

• Can do in summer….• …but not required to do in

summer

*refer to p 2 in MOU, Faculty Evaluation System

Page 12: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Professional DevelopmentYearly Distribution

Requirements

• 9 clock hours per academic years

• Can do in summer but…. • …not required to do in

summer

*refer to p 4 in MOU, Faculty Evaluation System

Satisfactory Standards of Employment

• 9 clock hours per academic years

• Can do in summer but….• …not required to do in

summer

*refer to p 2 in MOU,Faculty Evaluation System

Page 13: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Student ServiceYearly Distribution

Requirements

• Participation in departmental advising plan

• Can do in summer but….…not required to do in summer

*refer to p 4 in MOU, Faculty Evaluation System

Satisfactory Standards of Employment

• Participation in departmental advising plan

• Can do in summer but….• …not required to do in

summer

*refer to p 2 in MOU, Faculty Evaluation System

Page 14: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Additional Responsibilities*

These are the same for both SSE and YDR

*refer to pages 2 & 4 in MOU, Faculty Evaluation System

Page 15: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Decision-Making Process*Review of the Faculty Performance Evaluation Plan…

Review of Portfolios…

*refer to pages 16 & 17 in MOU, Faculty Evaluation System

Faculty member creates FPE Plan

Plan is reviewed by DH/PD. Once approved…

…it goes to the appropriate

Associate Dean for Hiring and

Evaluation for approval

Faculty member assembles portfolio

Portfolio is reviewed by committee (including DH/PD)

Portfolio is reviewed by the

appropriate Dean

Portfolio is reviewed by the

Provost who makes the final

decision

Page 16: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Online DocumentationThis is a screenshot from the PeopleSoft form…

Page 17: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Faculty Evaluation System 2013-2014 Calendar

Fall Semester 2013  

September 12th Faculty submit Faculty Performance Evaluation (FPE) Plan to Department Head (DH)/Program Director (PD) & Associate Dean (AD) for approval 

September 19th DH/PD & AD approve FPE or return to faculty for clarification

September 26th Faculty submit revised FPE plans to DH/PD & AD if needed

September 30th Faculty notified of final approval of FPE plan  

December 7th Rank and Tenure committees are finalized 

September 19th through November 25th

Classroom observation must be completed during this time

Page 18: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Faculty Evaluation System 2013-2014 Calendar (continued)

Winter Semester 2014  

April 4th  

Faculty submit Portfolio if applying for rank and tenure – Rank and Tenure committees begin reviewsFaculty Performance Evaluation (FPE) Reports are due for all faculty

April 18th Rank and Tenure committee’s submit recommendations to Dean

April 25th  

Dean’s recommendations completed on rank and tenure applications

May 2nd  

Provost’s decisions completed on rank and tenure applications

January 27th through April 14th

Classroom observation must be completed during this time2

June 13th Faculty will be notified of decisions regarding merit and merit midpoint

Page 19: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Requirements for Tenure, Rank, and Merit

Page 20: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Proportional Work

During the 2013-2014 AY and the 2014-2015 AY, requirements will be based on proportional work. Specifically, this will include:• Meeting the Yearly Distribution Requirements• Completion of one Substantive Project• Completion of one Additional Activity

Page 21: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Requirements for Tenure

Completion of the Yearly Distribution Requirements each year

Completion of two additional substantive projects from at least two of the five evaluation categories

Completion of an additional activity in two of the four required categories – documentation only – no

approval needed

Completion of the NFI, OHCC, and any additional trainings specified by the College

Page 22: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Requirements for Associate Professor

Completion of the Yearly Distribution Requirements each

year

Completion of four additional substantive projects from at least

two of the five evaluation categories

Completion of an additional activity in three

of the four required categories – documentation only – no approval needed

Page 23: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Requirements for Professor

Completion of the Yearly Distribution Requirements each

year

Completion of four additional substantive projects from at least

two of the five evaluation categories

Completion of an additional activity in each

of the four required categories – documentation only – no approval needed

Page 24: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Requirements for Merit Increases

Completion of the Yearly Distribution Requirements each

year

Completion of an additional substantive

project from at least one of the five evaluation

categories

Completion of an additional activity in each of the four

required categories – documentation AND

approval needed (in FPE)

Page 25: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Requirements for Merit Midpoint Increases

Completion of the Yearly

Distribution Requirements

each year

Completion of at least one substantive

project

Page 26: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Requirements for Temporary Full-Time Faculty

Completion of the Yearly

Distribution

Requirements each

year

Page 27: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Definitions, Explanations, and Additional Information

Page 28: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Substantive ProjectsMore details will be provided in the session “Developing

Substantive Projects”

Page 29: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Substantive Projects

A “Substantive Project” is defined as one…

• …taking a minimum of 15 hours per year to complete

• …having a clear outcome or product that results from the project

• …meeting a clear need of the Department, College, or individual’s professional growth

• …having the approval of the faculty member’s Department Head/Program Director and Associate Dean in advance (as part of the annual FPE process)

Page 30: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Characteristics of a Strong Substantive Project

• Responds to an institutional need• Makes a tangible, positive impact• Establishes the faculty member’s professional identity• Demonstrates mastery of a concept or set of skills relevant to

teaching and learning

Page 31: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Faculty Performance Plans and Reports

More details will be provided in the session “Developing FPE Plans and Reports”

Page 32: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Characteristics of Strong FPE Plans and Reports

• Thoughtful; complete• Balanced• Each effort can stand on its own• The contributions represent the faculty member as an

authentic educator and learner• The completed Report could be used as an exemplary guide

for a new faculty

Page 33: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Information for Classroom Observations

More details on this topic will be provided in the session “Classroom Observation Training”

Page 34: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

What is Effective Instruction?

Effective instruction involves…• …creating an environment conducive to learning • …use of effective instructional strategies • …facilitation of positive, engaging classroom interaction • …engaging multiple learning styles• …classroom management

Page 35: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Delivering Constructive Feedback

• Focuses on process of teaching and learning• Expresses empathy• Refers to specific behaviors• Includes time for reflection and discussion• Solution-focused, rather than “problem-seeking”• Offers opportunity for follow-up

Page 36: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Tracking Your Professional Development Participation

Page 37: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Viewing Your Training Summary…

In order to access your training summary, follow these steps…

1. Visit www.grcc.edu/cwis2. Click “Login to CS9PROD”3. Log-in using your username and password4. In PeopleSoft, click “Self-Service”5. Select “Learning and Development”6. Select “Training Summary”

Page 38: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Screenshot from PeopleSoft

Page 39: The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System

Questions?