Upload
kristian-george
View
216
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Role of Modern Premixed Analogues in Clinical Practice
Raef M. Botros
Professor of Medicine
Ain Shams University
Facts & Figures about Diabetes
• 285 Million Diabetic patients 2010• 439 Million Diabetic patients 2030• 70% of diabetics live in developing
countries• 3.8 Million deaths per year• 1 Million amputations per year• 2.5 Million cases of retinopathy
per year
Source: IDF Diabetes Atlas 2010 - WHO
Presentation overview
• Does strict glycaemic control matter?
• Why and when should insulin be initiated?
• Psychological barriers for Insulin initiation
• Targets for glycaemic control
• Contribution of FPG & PPG to overall glycaemic control
• Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30: Superior glycaemic control & Safety profile
• Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30: improved convenience
• Conclusion
Improving control reduces risks oflong-term complications
Every 1% drop in HbA1c can reduce long-term diabetes complications
43%
Lower extremity amputation or fatal peripheral
vascular disease
37%
Microvascular disease
19%
Cataract extraction
14%
Myocardial infarction
16%
Heart failure
12%
Stroke
UKPDS: Stratton et al. BMJ 2000;32:405–12
HbA1c & Microvascular ComplicationsR
ela
tive R
isk
Retinopathy
Nephropathy
Neuropathy
Microalbuminuria
HbA1c (%)
15
13
11
9
7
5
3
1
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Skyler JS. Endocrinol Metab Clin. 1996;25:243–254.
Poor glycaemic control leads toLong-term complications…
Diabetic nephropathy
Proliferativediabetic retinopathy
Atherosclerosis
Diabetic foot
Sections through an arterySections through an artery
Beta
-cell
fun
ctio
n (
%)
Years from diagnosis
50% beta-cells declined at time of diagnosis
0
50
100
75
25
Diagnosis
12 8 0 4 8 12
The beginning of the beta-cell loss was estimated by extrapolation back to 100% function and the lack of significant insulin secretion by extrapolation forward.IGT=impaired glucose tolerance.Modified from Lebovitz HE. Diabetes Reviews. 1999;7:139-153.
Why is insulin initiation inevitable?
-4
Type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease
Glycaemic control deteriorates over time in type2 diabetic patients
Media
n H
bA
1c
(%
)
Years from randomisation
Recommended target ≤ 6.5†
2 4 6 8 100
GlibenclamideChlorpropamideMetformin
6
7
8
9
0
5
4
3
2
1
†Diabetes UK guidelinesUK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998;352:854–65
Typical range of HbA1c in people without diabetes
Patients on SU + Metformin with HbA1c > 8%
44%
68%79% 85%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
First year Second year Third year Fourth year
YearsafteradditionofSUtoMET
PatientswithA1c>8%
Not only OAD Mono-therapy fails but also Combination OADs fail too
Cook et al. Diabetes Care 2005; 28:995-1000
2220 patients with T2DM treated with SU+MET were studied in a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records from U.K.
Insulin use is often delayed, despite poor glycaemic control1,2
1OAD
2OADs
3OADs
Diet
2.9 years 4.7 years 2.5 years 2.7 years
Mean H
bA
1c a
t la
st
vis
it (%
)
8
9
10
8.8%
9.4% 9.1%
1Novo Nordisk. Type 2 Diabetes Market Research. 2Roper Starch US Study, 2000.
OAD, oral antidiabetic drug
Insulin use is often delayed, despite it is the most effective anti diabetic agent
Nathan DM. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:437-40.
12
PatientConcerns:1. Anxiety about pain and proper injection technique
2. Fear of hypoglycaemia
3. Perceived restriction in lifestyle
4. Social embarrassment with pre-meal injections
5. Concern that disease has progressed to a serious level
Hunt et al. Diabetes Care 20(3):292, 1997
Psychological Barriers for insulin initiation
PatientConcerns: Continue6.Timing of pre-meal injections 7.Sense of failure
8.Need for careful blood glucose monitoring
9.Concern that insulin will cause weight gain
Hunt et al. Diabetes Care 20(3):292, 1997
Psychological Barriers for insulin initiation
Physician Concerns:
1. Time requirement for teaching insulin therapy
2. Increased risk of severe hypoglycaemia
3. Worsened insulin resistance
4. Concern that insulin will cause weight gain
Hunt et al. Diabetes Care 20(3):292, 1997
Psychological Barriers for insulin initiation
ADA1 ACE/IDF2
HbA1c(%) <7.0 6.5
Fasting/preprandial
90-130mg/dl5.0-7.2mmol/l
<100mg/dl<5.6mmol/l
2-hourpostprandial
<180mg/dl<10.0mmol/l
<135mg/dl<7.5mmol/l
Targets for glycaemic control
For Optimal Management Should We Target……
FPG The basal
glucose level
PPGThe peak glucose level
HbA1cThe long-term average glucose level
Relative contributions of PPG and FPG to diurnal hyperglycaemia
Monnier et al. Diabetes Care 2003;26:881–5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
<7.3 7.3–8.4 8.5–9.2 9.3–10.2 >10.2
HbA1c quintiles
Rela
tive c
ontr
ibuti
on
of
PPG
and
FPG
to d
iurn
al hyperg
lyca
em
ia (
%) Postprandial
glucose (PPG)
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG)
70%
FPG increases with worsening diabetes
30%
Treatment should cover meal times glucose peaks
Glu
Thr
Lys
ThrTyr Phe Phe Gly Arg
GluGly
Cys
Val
Leu
Tyr
Leu
Ala
Val
Leu
His
Ser
GlyCysLeuHisGlnAsnValPheB1
Asn CysTyr
Asn
Glu
Leu
Gln
Tyr
LeuSerCysIleSerThrCys
Cys
Gln
Glu
Val
Ile
Gly
A21B28B30
AspPro
Asp
NovoMix30 (Biphasic insulin aspart) What is Insulin aspart?
Absorption: human insulin vs. Insulin aspart
Insulin aspart
Insulinconcentr ation (M)
Absorption
Monomer
Capillary membrane
T-typehexamer
Dimer
R-typehexamer
10–3
10–4
10–6
10–8
Human insulin
This is purely schematic to illustrate absorption of molecules
Dual-release insulin concept: BHI 30
• Physiological insulin profile:basal componentmeal-related peaks
Physiological insulin profile
Hyperglycaemia
Hypoglycaemia
• Biphasic Human Insulin fails to re-create the physiological insulin profile
BHI 30
Jacobsen L et al. Eur J Clin Pharm 2000;56:399–403
Rationale for NovoMix 30 faster onset, more effective control and lower risk of hypoglycaemia
• Physiological insulin profile:basal componentmeal-related peaks
Physiological insulin profile
Protamine crystallised insulin aspart
• Rapid-acting insulin analogues together with a basal insulin provide physiological insulin replacement
Soluble insulin aspart• NovoMix® 30 replace both meal-related and basal insulin
NovoMix® 30
(30%)
(70%)
• Better PPG control
• Lower risk of hypoglycemia
Jacobsen L et al. Eur J Clin Pharm 2000;56:399–403
Improved Glycaemic control with NovoMix 30 Once or twice-daily
Garberstudy(1-2-3)
• Aim: To assess whether addition of NovoMix30 could achieve AACE, IDF and ADA guidelines in type 2 diabetic patients failed on OADs
• Method: – 100 patients had diabetes > 12 months – Using 2 OADs or at least one OAD plus once-daily basal
insulin – HbA1c level is between (7.5% and <10%) and the
average is 8.6%
Garber et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2006;8(1):58-66
HbA1c reduction with NovoMix 30 Once- & twice-daily
Garber et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2006;8(1):58-66
HbA1c
Conclusion:This trial demonstrates that initiation of NovoMix30 to type 2 patients poorly controlled on OAD was an effectivetreatmentapproach
HbA1c reduction using NovoMix 30 in 6 international studies
INITIATE EuroMix ACTION PREFER 1-2-3 IMPROVETM
9.7%
6.9%
9.2%
7.5%
8.1%
6.5%
8.4%
7.2%
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
8.6%
7.2%
HbA
1c (%
)
9.4%
7.1%
HbA1c
1- McSorley PT et al. Clin Ther 2002;24(4):530–539
2- Kann PH et al. Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes ... Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2006; 114: 527–532
3- Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2008
4- Garber et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2006;8(1):58-66
5-The American Journal of Medicine (2009) 122, 1043-1049
6- P.Valensi ,2009 Int J Clin Pract
*1
*3
*2
*4
*5
*6
Boehm B et al. Diabet Med 2002;19(5):393–399
Significantly lower prandial glucose
increment with NovoMix® 30
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
BiAsp 30 BHI 30
Mean p
randia
l glu
cose
in
crem
ent
(mm
ol/l)
p < 0.02 between treatment groups
(n = 128) (n = 141)
29%reduction
PPG
Reduced glucose excursionsvs. Lispro Mix25TM and BHI 30
p < 0.05
–10%
p < 0.001
–17%
0
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Lispro Mix 25TM NovoMix® 30 BHI 30
Blo
od
glu
cose
exc
urs
ion
0– 5
h (m
mo
l/l h
)
Hermansen K et al. Diabetes Care 2002;25:883–888
PPG
FPG reduction using NovoMix 30 in 6 international studies
14.0
INITIATE EuroMix ACTION PREFER 1-2-3 IMPROVETM
11.011.0
9.6
0
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
FPG
(mm
ol/L)
9.2
6.4
13
14
7.1
8.6
7.2
8.1
10.9
6.6
0
100
150
200
250
FPG
(mg/d
L)
FPG
1- McSorley PT et al. Clin Ther 2002;24(4):530–539
2- Kann PH et al. Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes ... Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2006; 114: 527–532
3- Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2008
4- Garber et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2006;8(1):58-66
5-The American Journal of Medicine (2009) 122, 1043-1049
6- P.Valensi ,2009 Int J Clin Pract
*5
*2
*1
*3
*4
*6
Reduced major hypoglycaemia after 3 months
Nu
mb
er o
f h
ypo
gly
caem
ic e
pis
od
es
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
NovoMix® 30 BHI 30
42 events
20 events
52% relative risk reduction
Boehm B et al. Diabet Med 2002;19(5):393–399
(n = 138) (n = 153)
Warren ML et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2004;66(1):23-29
Afterpreprandialinjection
Afterpostprandialinjection
Mean p
lasm
a g
luco
se (
mg/d
l)
-15 60 120 180 240Time (minutes)
Blood glucose levels did not differ between injection times
37-41%lowerinjectionforcethanKwikPen®
Next Generation FlexPen®
APROM ID: 1062Created: October 2009
Next Generation FlexPen® has lower injection force
than SoloSTAR® and KwikPen®
With NovoFine® 32G Tip needleMean injection force of Next Generation FlexPen®, SoloSTAR® and KwikPen® at three different injection speeds
15-22%lowerinjectionforcethanSoloSTAR®
Asakura et al. Evaluation of injection force of three insulin delivery pens. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2009;10:1389-1393
How to start NovoMix30
Simple intensification with the same insulin in the same device
NovoMix 30 core data sheet June 2008
Conclusion:
Strong relation exists between A1C reduction and reduction of
microvascular complications
Glycaemic control deteriorates over time in type2 patients
using OADs
Insulin use is often delayed, despite poor glycaemic control `
NovoMix® 30 FlexPen® provides superior glycaemic control
& significant reduction in major hypoglycemia
NovoMix® 30 FlexPen® offers convenient mealtime flexibility
THANK YOU