Upload
lamdung
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TheRoleofFacialExpressionsinVocalEmotionalCommunication
BillThompsonMacquarieUniversity
Sydney,Australia
Categoriesofnon‐verbalbehaviour
• Eckman&Friesen(1981)– Illustrators– Affectdisplays– Emblems
– Regulators
lowpitchhighpitch
illustratingthebeat
expressingjoy
followingtheheart
thewinningfist
Theextended‐emotionsperspective
1.Emotionsinvolvechangesinmultiplesubsystemsbeyondfeeling:cognition,motivation,physiologicalreaction&motorexpression.
2.Subsystemsaresynchronizedonmultiplelevelsandextend(viafeedback&feedforward)tosocial&physicallevels
3.Facialexpressionsareintegratedwiththesonicdimensionofmusic&functionasbothsignalsystem&foremotionalsynchronization
SeeScherer,1984,2001,2004,Grandjean&Scherer,2008,others;SeealsoworkbyAndyClark
Theextended‐emotionsperspectiveWheredofacialexpressionsfit?
1. Introspectiveethnography:whatemotionsareinvolved?
2. Perceptualstudies:expression/decoding3. Productionstudies:analysisoffacialexpressions
Perceptualstudies
• Affectsperceiveddissonance• Affectsperceivedvalence• Affectsperceivedstructure• Occursautomaticallyandpreattentively
Reportedin:Thompson,2009Thompson&Balkwill,2009Thompson,Graham&Russo,2005Thompson,Russo&Quinto,2008Thompson&Russo,2007Livingstone,Thompson,Russo,2009Ceaser,Thompson,&Russo,2009
Facial expressions of emotional valence
• Participants shown videos of sung major or minor intervals & rated emotional valence of sounded music (positive to negative).
• In some conditions, the dynamic facial expressions were “switched” to make “incongruent” conditions (e.g., major sounded interval with facial expressions that accompanied the minor sung interval).
Thompson, Russo & Quinto (2008)
•Isconsciousattentioninvolved?Toassessthisquestion,viewersalsocountedthenumberofzerosthatappearedonthescreen.
•By“occupying”attentionalresourceswecoulddeterminetheinvolvementofconsciousattentioninaudio‐visualintegrationofemotionalinformation.
Facial expressions of melodic interval
• Participants shown silent videos of sung melodic intervals and asked to rate the size of the “imagined” intervals
• Several intervals presented, from zero to 12 semitones
Thompson & Russo (2007)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Interval Size (semitones)
Mean
In
terv
al
Siz
e R
ati
ng
Singer 1Singer 2Singer 3
Acrosssingers:r=0.94(perceived&actualintervalsize)
r=0.90
r=0.88
r=0.95
Facialexpressionsoftonality
• Jazzsingerssangthelastphraseofsilentnight,substitutingthelasttoneforeachof13probetones
• Performersinstructedtosingexpressively
• Participantssawvideos(nosound)andjudgedthegoodness‐of‐fitofthefinalprobeexpression
•Spotsusedformotiontracking
•Last(probe)tonesungtwicetominimizeconstraintsofintervalsize
•PresentedWITHOUTsound
Presentations
Productionstudies
Motioncapture
• Design:7participantswatcheda“model”andthenimitatedthesungphraseandemotionalintentinprecisetimewiththemusic.
• Participants:differenttrainedsingersusedforsungmodel(target)andimitation.
FromLivingstone,Thompson&Russo,2009,MusicPerception
Methods• Numberofmarkersused=13• Cameras:4xMX‐F20(2megapixels)• Conditions:
– Emotionexpressed:3(happy,sad,neutral)– Verbalaccompaniment:6– Repetition:2
• Totalnumberoftrials(captures)=36• Tempo:80bpm• Melody:tonic‐supertonic‐leadingtone‐tonic• Practicetrials:about10
Timeframesofinterest
1. Duringmodel Emotionalsynchronisation
2. Beforesinging Emotionalplanning3. Singingphase Implementationofimitation
4. Post‐singing Lingeringemotionalsignal
Model:Grassisgreeninsummertime
PERCEPTION PLANNING IMITATION LINGERING
Imitation:Grassisgreeninsummertime? ? ?
Model
Subject
Markerplacementonface
Eyebrows•Inner/outer,leftandright
Lips•Upperandlowercentre•Leftandrightcorners
Stablepoints•Tipandbridgeofnose•Leftandrightsideofhead•Centreofforehead
Referencepointformeasuredmovement
Positiveemotion:capturesession
Timecourseoffeaturedisplacementrelativetonosetipinthehappycondition,averagedacrosscaptures/participants
Averagedisplacementofeyebrow
‐7
‐6
‐5
‐4
‐3
‐2
‐1
0
1
Perception Planning Production Post-Production
Dis
pla
ce
me
nt
(mm
)
PanelA:OuterEyebrow
Happy
Sad
Neutral
Sad
Averagedisplacementoflipcorner
‐7
‐6
‐5
‐4
‐3
‐2
‐1
0
1
Perception Planning Production Post-Production
Dis
pla
ce
me
nt
(mm
)
PanelB:LipCorner
Happy
Sad
NeutralHappy
Empiricalevidence:Electromyography(EMG)
Zygomaticandcorrugatormusclesinhappyandsadconditions
Fourparticipantswentthroughthesameprocedurebutfacial
expressionsmeasuredbyEMG
CompositeEMGfunctionsforemotionalandneutralconditions
“Emotional”isthesumofzygomaticforhappy&corrugatorforsad:Measuresoverallfacialresponsivenesstoemotionalstimuli
Bycomparingthetwocompositemeasures,wecandissociatemovementsrelatedtoproduction(neutralcomposite)frommovementsrelatedtoemotionality
Summaryofproductionstudies
• Performersareawareoftheemotionalimpactofstructuralfeaturesinmusicandtakeanactiveroleininteractingwiththosefeaturestoshapeexperience
• Facialmovementsreflectbothemotionalandstructuralcontentofmusic
• Suchmovementsinfluenceperceptionsofmusic
• Whenwatchinganemotionallysungphrase,performerssynchronisefacialexpressionswiththemodelexpression
• Emotionalsingingisprecededbyemotionalplanning
• Emotionalsingingisfollowedbyemotionallingering
Conclusions
1. Personal(introspective)accountsindicatethatemotionalresponsestomusicreflectepisodicmemories,emotionalgoals,communicativeintentionsandphysiologicalresponsestomusicalattributes.
2. Facialexpressionsandmovementsareoftenintegratedwithaffectiveexperience.Visualsignalsaffectinterpretationsofemotionalvalence,dissonance,melodicstructureandtonalstability.Audio‐visualintegrationoccursautomatically,withoutconsciouscontrol.
3. Emotionalresponsesbyperformersarereflectedinfacialexpressions,whichreflectsynchronizationwithothers,emotionalplanning,musicproduction,andemotionallingeringandclosure