Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Role of Attention & The Role of Attention & Executive Functioning in the Executive Functioning in the
Process of LearningProcess of Learning
Adam Scheller, PhD, NCSP
2 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Disclosure
This free session is sponsored by Pearson Clinical Assessment.
Adam Scheller, PhD is an employee of Pearson. Several examples of assessments and interventions mentioned in this presentation are either published or distributed by Pearson Clinical Assessment.
3 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Outline
• Neuro-anatomy primer• Executive Functioning and Attention, what are
they?• Role of EF and Attention in Learning• How do we intervene?
4 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Phineas Gage
From the collection of Jack and Beverly Wilgus
5 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Gage Legacy
6 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
7 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Cafeteria Example
8 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
What is Executive Functioning?
• A.R. Luria (1973)• Russ Barkley• Andrewes (2001)• Miyake et al. (2000)
9 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Evolving
• Evolving definitions– Micro level: e.g., Cognitive flexibility, Attentional
control, Updating, Sequencing, Abstracting– Macro level: e.g., Inhibitory control, Problem
solving, Organization, Planning, Concept Formation
10 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Executive Functioning (EF) Taxonomy
• Executive Control– Inhibition or Disinhibition of behavior,
emotions, speech, cognition, attention, etc. – Flexibility
• Metacognition– Working Memory– Directly affects processing speed
• Control the “gate” of information
11 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
EF Taxonomy (cont.)
• Problem Solving– Plan, sequence, and self-monitor– Feedback loop, from which we can change the
process to be either correct (if incorrect) or more efficient (faster).
• Organization– Ability to order, sort, categorize
• Concept Formation– Categorize– Abstracting– Situation based judgments.
12 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
How do I get there?
13 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Attention
• Sensory Distinction (Auditory/Visual)• “Executive” Attention• Attention must be online for other processes
to occur. • Inattention affects “higher order” cognition,
compared to language alone, per se
14 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
…with Executive Dysfunction
• Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
• Bipolar Disorder
• Depression
• Autism/Asperger’s Disorder
• Traumatic Brain Injury
15 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Photo Credit: Patrick J. Lynch, medical illustrator
16 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Axon
17 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Grey Matter White Matter
18 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Processing Theory and Interconnectivity
• Luria (1973)• Reciprocal Interaction• Dean-Woodcock Neuropsychology Model
(2003)
19 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Development of Executive Functions
• Earliest executive abilities (Gioia, Isquith, Guy, & Kenworthy, 2000)• 12 month olds exhibit goal directed problem
solving behavior• 18 month olds exhibit self control to maintain an
action or inhibit a behavior
• Three major “growth spurts” (Anderson, 2002):– 0-5 years– 7-9 years– 11-13 years
20 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
EF Related Grade Expectations
By Grade 2
• Perform simple chores (self-care, make bed) with reminders
• 2-3 step directions to run errands• Bring papers to/from school• Complete 20-minute homework assignments• Inhibit behaviors: follow safety rules, raise hand
to speak, keep hands to self
21 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
EF Related Grade Expectations
By Grades 3-5
• Bring books, papers, assignments to/from school• Keep track of belongings• 1 hour of homework• Plan/execute simple school projects (e.g. book
report)• Keep track of changing daily schedule
22 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
EF Related Grade Expectations
By Middle Grades 6-8
• Use system to organize schoolwork: assignment book, dividers/folders
• Follow complex school schedule: changing teachers
• Long-term projects, including creating time line to follow
• Inhibit rule-breaking in absence of visible authority
23 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
EF in Adolescence
• Flat developmental trajectory– Compared to the significant spikes or spurts
(Anderson, 2002) evident during early and middle childhood.
• Information processing, cognitive flexibility, and goal setting are basically mature by 12 years old (Davies & Rose, 1999), but…
24 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
EF into Adulthood
• Does not end in adolescence• Most potential is reached by early to mid 20’s
• Continued improvement into adulthood.• Refinement of strategies• Improved decision-making• Increased efficiency and fluency• Improved abstraction
(Anderson, 2002; Wang, 1987)
25 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
MRI Scans (5-20 years)
http://www.loni.ucla.edu/~thompson/DEVEL/dynamic.html (9/14/09)
26 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
ROLE OF EF AND ATTENTION IN LEARNING
27 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Grey Matter White Matter
28 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Effects of EF Deficits on Learning
• Average or better IQ, but still having difficulties?
• Interrelated to other aspects of cognition• Inhibition and…
– School Readiness (Blair & Diamond, 2008; Blair & Razza, 2007; Diamond, et al., 2007)
– Academic achievement (St Clair-Thompson & Gathercole, 2006)
• Working Memory• Multiple simultaneous tasks• Dysfluency
29 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
EF and Reading
• Reading– Difficulty with Reading Comprehension/Inferring
meaning/Abstraction– Dyslexics often have affected Inhibition, Working
Memory, and design and verbal Fluency (Reiter, Tucha, & Lange, 2005)
• Fluency– Link to executive functioning and attention– Difference from Word Identification and Word
Attack (WRMT-III)– Link to comprehension
30 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
EF and Math
• Math– Difficulties with multiple steps, algebraic
equations, word problems– “Careless Errors”– Fluency
31 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
EF and Writing
• Writing– Difficulties organizing written output, including
format of arguments, and grammatical and spelling errors• Dysfluent writing, doesn’t transition well within
text• Bullet-point writing
– “Slow” writing
32 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Learning Behavior
OLAI-2 (Gentile, 2011)
33 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Assessment
• Standardized tests• NEPSY-2• D-KEFS• CVLT-C• WISC-IV• Rey CFT• Achievement measures
• Rating Scales• Brown ADD• BASC-2• BRIEF
• Observations• Do test findings present in-situ?
• Qualitative and quantitative data• Evaluate congruence of test data with the observed
• Assessment of outcomes to uncover the process
34 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
HOW DO WE INTERVENE ON EF WEAKNESSES?
35 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Think of all things that have multiple steps…
36 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
…require understanding the main idea
37 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
…require us to use multiple skills at once
38 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
…require us to process multiple factors simultaneously
39 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
The goal of EF interventions
• One at a time…OK, but three at a time…
• Make tasks less complex
• High expectations, but attainable
• “Retrain the Brain”
40 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Brain-based interventions
• Behavioral• Cogmed
• Researchers posit that Cogmed training transfers to executive functioning, supporting link with executive control and WM. (Diamond et al., 2011; Thorell et al. 2009)
• For more information on Cogmed research, free webinars and demonstrations go to:
www.cogmed.com www.psychcorp.com
41 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Behavioral EF Interventions
•Two-pronged Interventions:
– Internally focused•Skill acquisition, development, refinement
– Externally focused•Modification of environment or tasks
42 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Externally-Focused Interventions
• Reinforce skill development through focus on learning skills– Interventions can become THE skill– Reliance on adaptations and modifications
• Examples of Externally-Focused Interventions
43 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Internally-Focused Interventions
• “Internalize” rather than use of external structure or modification.
• Rely less on outside assistance over time
• Examples of Internally-Focused Interventions
(Ylvisaker, Feeney, & Szekeres, 1998)
45 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Outcome Evaluation Overview
• Evaluate the outcome of the plan
1. Collect outcome data2. Determine if function has improved 3. Evaluate intervention integrity4. Evaluate intervention validity5. Maintain or modify the plan
46 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Maintain the Plan
• Improvement does not have to be absolute
• Look for reasonable improvements
• Continue if they are effective and necessary
47 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Modify the Plan
• Progress not acceptable
• Interventions– Consult literature or experts
• Are there any barriers for implementation?
48 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
Remember…
• Give them time, don’t give up
• Implement in multiple settings
• Start basic, then move to more complex
49 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
References…
• Anderson, P. (2002). Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 8(2), 71-82.
• Andrewes, D. (2001). Neuropsychology: From Theory to Practice. Psychology Press, New York, NY.
• Blair, C. & Diamond, A. (2008). Biological processes in prevention and intervention: The promotion of self-regulation as a means of preventing school failure. Developmental Psychology, 20, 899—911.
• Blair, C. & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false-belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78, 647-663.
• Davies, P.L., & Rose, J.D. (1999). Assessment of cognitive development in adolescents by means of neuropsychological tasks. Developmental Neuropsychology, 15(2), 227-248.
• Dean, R.D., Woodcock, R.W., Decker, S.L., & Schrank, F.A. (2003). A cognitive neuropsychological assessment system. In WJ III Clinical Use and Interpretation. Elsevier Science, USA.
• Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J., & Munro, S. (2007). Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science, 318, 1387– 1388.
• Gentile, L.M. (2011). Oral Language Acquisition Inventory, Second Ed. (OLAI-2) – Manual. NCS Pearson, Inc. Bloomington, MN.
50 | Copyright 2012. Pearson Education and its Affiliates. All rights reserved
References…
• Gioia, G.A., Isquith, P.K., Guy, S.C., & Kenworthy, L. (2000). Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) – Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. Lutz, Fl.
• Luria, A.R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Emerson, M.J., Witzki, A.H., Howerter, A., Wager, T. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100
• Reiter, A. Tucha, O. Lange, KW. (2005). Executive functions in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia. 11:116–131.
• St Clair-Thompson, H., L., & Gathercole, S., E. (2006). Executive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 745-759.
• Thorell L B, Lindqvist S, Bergman S, Bohlin G, Klingberg T (2009). Training and transfer effects of executive functions in preschool children. Developmental Science, 12(1): 106-113.
• Ylvisaker, M., Feeney, T., & Szekeres, F. (1998). Cognitive Rehabilitation: Executive Functions. In M. Ylvisaker (Ed.), Trau-matic brain injury rehabilitation: Children and adolescents (2nd ed., pp. 244). Boston: But-terworth-Heinemann.
For the next session in the series…
www.psychcorp.com/CEwebinars
Pearson Customer ServicePearson Customer Service
1-800-627-7271 (USA) 1-866-335-8418 (Canada)
Specific WebinarSpecific Webinar--Related Related Comments or QuestionsComments or Questions
Adam Scheller, PhD, NCSP Pearson Clinical Assessment [email protected]