MDAM” “Meyrick Douglas Aplin Mytton “

A Legally Robbed VictimAnd

Supported by His Multitudes Of Antagonized Sympathizers.

At Last!The Legal Profession Devious Colluding Anti-Public Beleaguering Swindling

Team have all Been Court (The big firm)! Cornered And Caught-Out!

And Exposed For The Public To Consider The Elimination Of “Fraudulent Judicial Independence” And The Public Trying of Its Perpetrators,

In An “Excuria Extra Judicial” Out Of Legal Court Process And Procedure.

So As To Adequately Punish the Anti-Public Swindling Legal Profession Terrorist Conduct, By The Verdicts Of A Public Scrutinizing Sentencing

Supervising Seething With Animosity Victimized Victims Doing The Judging.

“MDAM” At Last1. Has Red-Handedly, “Cornered And Court Caught Out”, The Australian Judaeo Judaic Judicial Jurisprudence Jurisdiction Ruled Banking Confraternity Authorities, Offices, Official’s, All Colluding As Collaborating Cohorts, Committing Outright Anti-Public Slight of Hand And Legal Mind Deception Depredations Involving: - Money, Asset, Property Looting Latrociny Larceny, Sacking Legal Profession Theft Swindles, Deliberately Causing, Impoverishment, Domestic Misery And Suicide.2. The Legal Profession, Habitualized To Loot, From Their First Moot, Have Implemented Their Routine Public Prosecuting Persecuting, Pilfering Purloining, Legal Process Procedures, Based On The Queensland State And Federal Government Parliamentary Politician Approved, Published and Proclaimed Solicitorial Conceived Revenue Extortion Racket Scheme To Inflict An Endless Tyrant Public Depriving, “Usurping Usury Philosophy Plot’s Against The Public As Has Been Fraudulently Imposed On

MDAM“Meyrick Douglas Aplin Mytton “

3. Using Queensland State Government Fraudulent Extortion Racket Despot Dictator Sanctioning Threatening Writ Used As Standard Practice By The Legal Profession To Swindle And Plunder All Australian Residents. The Evil Philosophy Writ Intentions Of The Whole Australian Legal Profession And The

Queensland State Prosecuting Enforcement Registry

1

4. “SPER”a. Seize and sell personal property. b. Impose a charge on property (annuities, debentures, stocks and other property.) Issue a fine collection notice for the regular redirection of earnings, a debt owed, or from

financial accounts. The registry may register an interest in land or property (E.g. motor vehicle.) Inflict the suspension of your driver’s license or the ability to obtain one.

(The banks cooperate in this SPER philosophy)

5. The Following Enumerated Legally Linked Wrongdoers Have Been Caught Out Implementing The Above Shown SPER Corrupt Philosophy Warranting The Closing Down Of The Whole Judaic Judaeo Judicial Independence Despotic Dictatorship In The Interests Of It’s past, current and intended unalerted Victims.

The Schedule Of Caught Out Wrong Doers 1. The Australian Governments and The Prime Minister, Commander In Chief Mr. Howard a. The .. .. .. .. Ministers assistant “Mr. Ruddok”

2. The .. .. .. .. .. Solicitor’s Office. 3. The .. .. .. .. Solicitor Mr. Ian Andersen. 4. The .. .. .. .. .. Spokesman Mr. Silver 5. The .. .. .. .. .. Parliamentarians Concerned Yet To be named. 6. The .. .. .. .. .. Brisbane Child Support Agency CSA 7. The .. .. .. .. .. CSA Catharine Argall, Registrar. 8. The .. .. .. .. .. CSA Danielle McIsaac Admin P.S. Grade 6. 9. The .. .. .. .. .. CSA Edwina Horder –Smith Admin P. S Grade 10. The .. .. .. .. .. CSA Angela Tillmanns Regional Registrar. 11. The .. .. .. .. .. CSA Allison Millet Regional Registrar. 12. The .. .. .. .. .. CSA M. Brennen Officer.

13. The Queensland State Government’s Premier Mr. Beattie. 14. The .. .. .. Parliamentarians To be named. 15. The .. .. .. Brisbane Magistrates Court. 16. The .. .. .. .. Magistrates. Court. 17. The .. .. .. .. Magistrate B. Hine 18. The .. .. .. .. Magistrate S .M. Dermot Kehoe.

19. The Westpac Banking Corporation.20. The .. .. .. Mr. David Morgan21. The .. .. .. Mr. Bill Evans22. The .. .. .. Mr. Peter Scalzi.23. The .. .. .. Mr. Terri Gonis.24. The .. .. .. Mr. Joe Mathews.25. The .. .. .. Appointed Brisbane Lawyers Minter Ellison26. The .. .. .. Appointed Brisbane Lawyers Minter Ellison Solicitor

Melinda Smith

2

27. The .. .. .. Solicitor Responsible. David O’Brien.28. The Queensland State Government.29. The Queensland State Prosecuting Registrar SPER A Queensland State furtive intimidating Extortionist fraudulent despot dictator summary arbitrary phony routine false conviction concern Falsely called a court.30. The Australian Federal And State And Judicial System31. The Queensland state Police Force and public offending officers32. The Queensland Police Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners.33. Supreme Court of Brisbane and its Chief Registrar Mr. Toogood and Deputy registrar Mr. McDonnell and Leanne McDonnell” and “ Mr. Paul Marschke” re: - Brisbane Registry number 4466 of 2005.

6. Reviewers Note: - Who would have suspected that the above enumerated miscreant legally linked wrongdoers all work together as one, in collusion Against Victims as they have done against MDAM to dispossess him of his home and property based on combined unarguable incontrovertible swindling legal profession fraudulent seizing resumption.

7. Ultimatum To The Legal And Banking System of the Big FirmThis MDAM document Is An ultimatum to the above enumerated listed miscreant wrongdoers to immediately withdraw the fraudulent Supreme Court Officials (quasi-judge Registrars) Fraudulent Order Granted in favour of the Westpac Banking Corporation to illegally take possession of MDAM’s Home and Land based on the felonious fraudulent false Supreme Court Favoured default application submitted by Minter Ellison Solicitor-Lawyer’s, Followed By The Supreme Courts Fraudulent Orders To Seize The Home And Property Of MDAM with the assistance of the Supreme Court Bailiff-David Henderson.

8. Should The Legal Authorities refuse to consider the above request to withdraw the Supreme Court fraudulent orders and cease and prevent the fraudulent sale of MDAM’s property in favour of the Westpac Banks fraud orders and default action, serious unique retaliation consequences may not be avoided! It is imperative that the confiscation, cancelled title deed be returned and reinstated to its rightful owener-MDAM. The only alternative will be for the Excuria Extra Judicial Out of Court Anti-Judicial Independence, supported by over 800,000 non-custodial Fathers, Mothers & other objectors to State, Federal Government, City Shire Council & Local Government, these Objectors will be petitioned To Join and Link Together in a united, combined, Counter-force to put a final end to the whole Legal and Banking collusion System by unusual not previously encounted methods that could get out of hand resulting in events too ghastly to contemplate. The Queensland State Government principals are requested to contact the clandestine hidden rulers of Australia to Decide whether they are prepared to have their Legal System and joint banking system terminated in the public interest and safety.

9. When The Supreme Court Officials were caught out committing their corrupt court activities they attempted to cover up their skullduggery wrongful misconduct by foolishly publishing the following newspaper article revelation that exposes their activism.

10. Court Registrar RetiresThe chief administrator and register of Queensland’s Supreme and District courts will

retire on Friday, the fifth long serving court registry staffer to leave the complex within a

3

week. Ken Toogood, 57, has worked at the court complex in an administration role for 41 years- the last 18 as principal registrar and administrator. He will be officially fare welled at a valedictory service at the Brisbane courthouse this morning- an occasion usually reserved for departing judiciary. It is understood Mr. Toogood’s departure follows the early retirement of four other experienced registry staff in recent days. It is believed all have accepted voluntary redundancies or voluntary early retirement packages. In an interview with The Courier-Mail yesterday, Mr. Toogood cited the introduction of registrars in courtrooms as quasi-judges in a bid to reduce judicial case loads and the computerization of the registry process as among his most significant achievements. He paid tribute to his 180 court administration staff, who he said played a vital role in the administration of justice. He will be temporarily replaced by Magistrates Court administrator Paul Marschke until job is filled.

Courier Mail Wednesday 12th July 2006 page 14. 11. Reviewers Note That: - The Supreme Court and its Judicial Officials and Judges have Disgraced and Defiled Themselves further by stupidly ignorantly insultingly showing contempt to the public by Appointing “ Mr. Paul Marschke” to replace disgraced Mr. Toogood as Chief Registrar of The Supreme Court. The appointment of “ Mr. Paul Marschke” as Chief Registrar is a shockingly disgraceful incompetent Supreme Court Act, which the Queensland residents find Obnoxious because “ Mr. Paul Marschke” was previously responsible for the repeated false fake phony Queensland State Prosecuting Enforcement Registry “SPER Convictions based on their vile threatening intimidating philosophy; -

12. a. Seize and sell personal property. b. Impose a charge on property (annuities, debentures, stocks and other property.)

Issue a fine collection notice for the regular redirection of earnings, a debt owed, or from financial accounts.

The registry may register an interest in land or property (E.g. motor vehicle.) Inflict the suspension of your driver’s license or the ability to obtain one.

13. This insulting appointment to the Supreme Court Of SPER, miscreant evil activist Mr. Paul Marschke” to be Chief Registrar so that he can continue to impose his SPER property seizing philosophy as a Quasi-Judge involved in espionage collusion with banks extracting private confidential information on bank clients and legal confraternities potential victims and with the Supreme Courts full consent and snooping blessings.

14. This simply means that the Quasi-Judges will continue to judge public victims based on Corrupt intent SPER swindling revenue raising swindle agenda philosophy to the detriment of legally victimised Australian public residents Facing Quasi-Registrar Judge.

15. The outright theft of MDAM’s property occurred due to:

The Westpac Bank, Supreme & Magistrates Courts, Child Support Agency (CSA), The Federal Government Solicitors & Minter Ellison Solicitors, devious collusion extortion plot took

place in this manner!

4

The Westpac Banking Corporation divulged MDAM’s private confidential financial information to the CSA tax snoops (in cooperation with SPER) as standard practice in which all Banks breach their fiduciary trust to all their clients and account holders, that they intentionally deceive, and act in a gestalt chutzpah collusion against clients scheduled for legal profession sabotage and destruction.

Then to ensure that MDAM’s destruction plot favoured the CSA and the fraudulent Brisbane Magistrates Court (family matters) action against MDAM without prior notification, the bank assisted CSA and the Federal Government Solicitor by freezing MDAM’s bank funds and canceling his property loan account, deceitfully without any justification, except that they were assisting in the collapse, financial ruination & demise of MDAM at the Brisbane Magistrates Court, they did this in collusion with the Magistrates Court that had written out an arrest warrant to imprison MDAM and seize his assets before a trial or hearing. Oh! Oh! What a corrupt collusion!!!

This collusion plot was designed to insure that the penniless, poverty stricken and imprisoned before trial; MDAM could not afford a defence as Westpac Bank and its colluder’s intended.

The trial was a sham trial because the Magistrate stated that once; a Child Support Agency Official had signed a guilty Affidavit, which deemed that very act was the end of the matter because only a guilty verdict was possible regardless of any evidence to the contrary thereafter (it cannot be challenged).

The Brisbane Magistrates Court Quassi-Judge Officials convicted MDAM fraudulently as the CSA Affidavit was totally perjurous, as MDAM had paid $130,000.00 in excess of his CSA obligations.

The Australian Government Solicitor Ian Anderson acting on behalf of The Child Support

Agency (CSA) did not put into effect The Brisbane Magistrate Court orders to bankrupt and place in receivership and seize and sell MDAM’s property or exercise their caveat because they have been caught out. The reason they did not do this, was because the above were in collusion with the Westpac Banking Corporation.

The Westpac Bank found that their Illegal freezing of MDAM’s account funds and cancellation of his property loan account was without justification and put Westpac Bank in jeopardy, because they had been in collusion in the conviction of MDAM at The Brisbane Magistrate Court.

Because Australian Government Solicitor Ian Anderson failed to exercise his MDAM bankrupting plot and their caveat as they were caught out in their collusion with the Westpac Banking Corporation, who had been helping Mr. Anderson and The Child Support Agency by freezing funds, in turn leaving the Collusionists, in a vulnerable position with the bank exposed for their criminal activity. The Westpac Bank then soughted assistance from Solicitor Lawyers Minter Ellison who hatches a default plots under handed Legal profession Dirty trick.

The Westpac Banking Corporation Deviously decided to work in with the CSA that had been hounding MDAM for years.

They cunningly claim to have delivered a summons to MDAM which MDAM could not possibly answer as it was not received.

5

Then the Supreme Court deviously ruled that MDAM was in default of a non-existent, cancelled loan account/contract. The Westpac Bank was entitled to override The Magistrate Court’s CSA caveat of MDAM’S property and grant the benefit of the caveat to the Westpac Bank who had actually caused MDAM to be unable to meet his previous obligations to them due to freezing his funds prior to canceling his loan account illegally. MDAM has no further obligations because The Westpac Bank has cancelled his account; this means his obligations are ceased!!!

The Westpac Banking Corporation, The Magistrate’s Court, and CSA Tax snoops and The Supreme Court are not going to get away with their crimes against MDAM unpunished. An example is to be made of the whole Legal Profession system for the benefit of Australian residents who are likely to face the same dangers. The Westpac Bank is not going to get away with their crime of illegally seizing bank funds and closing his loan account, without any reasonable above board justification, and then have the gall to get a corrupt Solicitor Minter Ellison to lodge fraudulent default seizure applications at The Supreme Court, who have shown themselves to be equally corrupt by allowing their Quassi-judge Registrars to send their bailiff to seize MDAM’s property by force with Police assistance based on the totally corrupt false devious assertion that MDAM failed to meet his obligations to The Westpac Bank which did not exist because they had cancelled them, this is an incantation: which means: The use of a formula of words spoken or chanted to produce a magical devious legal affect.

The Supreme Court has blemished its character by incompetently allowing the Quasi-Judge registrars to fraudulently rule that MDAM has to be deprived of his property in favor of the corrupt Westpac Bank.

“This devious act is hereby recused.”

The Supreme Court Brisbane It’s Judges

And Registrars Specifically Mr. Toogood and Mrs. McDonnell

Re: - Brisbane Registry Number BS 4466 of 2005

This Is AnUrgent Impending Retribution Danger Caution WarningFrom MDAM. “Meyrick Douglas Aplin

Mytton” & Public SympathizersRegarding Impending repercussions too ghastly to contemplate.

6

1. Eminent In curia, Excoriate, and extra judicial retribution for any property Seizing Enforcement Order being approved by any Supreme Court Judge or Registrar, to support The Westpac Banking Corporation With a fraudulent Enforcement Order, based on the previous fraudulent default order granted and approved by the rubber stamped document bearing the signature of deputy registrar Mrs. McDonnell who judged in favour of the plaintiff Westpac Banking Corporation, assisted by It’s Officers Mr. Peter Scalzi, Mr. Terri Gonis, Mr. Joe Mathews. 2. This default judgment granted is based on an immoral act by The Westpac Banking Corporation Officials, such as Mr. Peter Scalzi, Mr. Terri Gonis, Mr. Joe Mathews and other officers working in conjunction with The Australian Federal Government solicitors and their Child Support Agency and then with Minter Ellison Lawyers and their officers “Solicitor Melinda Smith” and Responsible Solicitor David O’Brien.3. Westpac Banking Corporation Officials assisted by their officers became involved in a shockingly underhanded disgraceful devious collusion action, supporting the Australian Government Solicitors in conjunction with their Child Support Agency. “AGSCSA”4. The Westpac Banking Corporation Officers decided to participate in MDAM destruction by helping and assisting AGSCSA in collusion by divulging MDAM’s private fiduciary trust financial affairs to them for an ulterior motive.5. Then The Westpac Banking Corporation officers Decided to join the AGSCSA” extortion terrorist errorists persecuting property-seizing miscreants, who had taken a caveat on a MDAM property. Then AGSCSA” applied for an unwarranted arrest warrant to arrest MDAM which was granted by the corrupt judiciary prematurely, before the impending magistrates court case was set to take place so as to entrap the victim hindering him from arranging any self-defence this demonstrates devious democracy in corrupt anti-public action to reward dead soldiers descendants.6. At this critical point MDAM was caught in a legal profession “Judas Trap” and discovered that the Westpac Banking Corporation officers Mr. Peter Scalzi, Mr. Terri Gonis, Mr. Joe Mathews and other Officers, had decided to co-operate in the “AGSCSA” property-seizing swindle as filthy corrupt beyond belief Sabotaging ambushing devious MDAM crippling as criminal accessories.7. They contributed to the furtive fraudulent actions of “inflicting an excoriate extra judicial civil death on MDAM by Freezing his funds in the Westpac banking Corporation simultaneously canceling the MDAM property loan account ensuring that MDAM could not raise funds to pay another expensive Habitualized robbing solicitor to repeat MDAM”S previous losses of $12.000, paid to Solicitors that failed to do anything constructive and beneficial in return. This Westpac Banking Corporation freezing of MDAM’S funds and canceling the loan account prevented MDAM from raising more funds to once again waste unsuccessfully trying to defend against the treachery of the “AGSCSA” and the Westpac Banking Corporation officials and their Tacit Tactic Terrorist errorist, property purloining plundering pilfering persecuting activity, which at the same time ruined MDAM’s credit rating, as is a standard practice procedure that cripples victims without a trial being necessary. It would have been unwise to use a solicitor again.8. Thus the Westpac Banking Corporation officials had assisted and put into practice their crippling collusion plan to guarantee the final ruining of MDAM in the interests of “AGSCSA” agenda. Oh! Oh! What a dirty underhanded public sabotaging strategy.9. Then MDAM appeared in the Brisbane magistrates court as a legally undefended penniless deprived pauper who had been robbed repeatedly over 9 years of constant ‘AGSCSA” legal profession torture as planned and arranged by the sabotaging co-operation

7

of the Westpac Banking Corporation Officials illegally holding the victim’s funds like gangster bandit robbers.10. By this time MDAM discovered that he had unknowingly over paid the incompetent ‘AGSCSA” $130,000.00 in excess of what should have been paid to the ‘AGSCSA”, then it was discovered that the “stare decisis” sacred principle of the judiciary is “alienato rei prefertur juri accrescendi” which means: - “That the law favours the alienation rather than the accumulation of property”. Oh! Oh! How underhanded and against the public this is? The CSA should have not allowed this to happen and they should not have insisted to, on demanding undue amounts of money. 11. It was discovered that the whole legal profession has a deception sacred policy that justifies the deception imposed on MDAM and the public masses, which states: - a. If a man wants to be deceived then let him be deceived = “qui vault decepi decipiator “ b. The public wishes to be fooled therefore let it be fooled. = “ Populus vault decipi ergodecipiatur”. c. The world wishes to be deceived and wants to be deceived. = Modus vault decipi. Oh! Oh! No wonder the Legalus Homo Legal Profession, Solicitors, Lawyers, Judges, Justices, Magistrates, Police force Prosecutors and Police commissioners are regarded as corrupt by the masses far and wide. 12. The Brisbane Magistrate B. Hine Revealed further summary arbitrary legal profession corruption. He Stated in court that: - Once a solicitor such as Mr. Ian Anderson acting for ‘AGSCSA” authors a perjured affidavit for a child support agency officer, to blindly obediently sign the solicitor has created his very own convicting evidence, for him to use in court, where he is certain to be given a conviction verdict in his favour of his self-created authored affidavit regardless of how legally inconsistent and fictitious and deceptive the authored affidavit happens to be. Unreality is the order of the day and a chaos technique to benefit solicitors.13. The legal profession policy according to Brisbane Magistrate B. Hine is that a Solicitor can simply create his own cause and evidence in a court case, making him a participant in the matter, using his corrupt treacherous tacit tactics that impress obligingly approving pleased presiding Magistrates and Judges that routinely become accessories and therefore also participants in the case, showing their legal profession nepotism that condones judges magistrates that act from improper motives against public victims. 14. Magistrate B. Hine of the Brisbane magistrates court seemed be cautious due to MDAM warnings about the repercussions facing the court and all the wrong doers in regard to the case in question, during which time he made it clear that once a solicitor inveigles anyone to sign his authored work; That is the end of the matter, therefore a conviction has to be abided to, by magistrates regardless of inconsistencies. He seemed to be cautious concerning the repercussions promised and then concludes that some other magistrate should make a final decision on the matter. He used this ploy to get the case out of his court. 15. The next magistrate called S .M. Dermot Kehoe also became cautious about the MDAM promised repercussions, and he postponed the case for three weeks, probably to confer with other magistrates and then, when he returned to the court he seemed to be displeased with the negative verdict he was obviously obliged to give, apparently according to the principle stated by the first Magistrate B. Hine he made it amply clear that once a solicitor’ concocted affidavit was signed that very act simply ended the matter . 17. The magistrate called S .M. Dermot Kehoe was, obviously obliged to stick to the sacred principle that simply favored a solicitor created conviction based on the solicitor own cause of action and his own fraud. It was speculated that his advisers considered the matter

8

for three weeks and were fully aware of the fact that MDAM was already convicted with a civil death imposed by none other than the Westpac Banking Corporation officers, before any magistrates court trial had been set to occur on a certain date and that MDAM was a pauperized victim. It is likely that magistrate S .M. Dermot Kehoe was directed to give his negative verdict by his advisers because they well knew that MDAM was in the state of a penniless pauper trapped in a “Judas Trap” and therefore would be unlikely to mount an appeal to a negative magistrates court negative decision and that MDAM would be certain to collapse and give up any resistance, Oh! Oh! What jurisprudence cunningness they possess and apply!18. The Westpac Banking Corporation officers must have been self-assured that poor old MDAM could never take them by employing an expensive routinely overcharging solicitor to attack them under a false guise, for causing MDAM’S demise, by inflicting him with their destroying sabotaging civil death, whilst very safe in the knowledge that MDAM’s money was in their Westpac Banking Corporation’s possession having been confiscated without any solid grounds, to qualify such a summary arbitrary dirty deed action. They also must have been pleased with their successful plot that resulted in their canceling of his loan account as well.19. The Westpac Banking Corporation officials assumed that they are safe from retribution for their part in helping “AGSCSA” destroy MDAM”S financial existence, well knowing that MDAM’S Money of sufficient amount to engage a solicitor was safely in their own hands furtively and fraudulently. Mr. Peter Scalzi, Mr. Terri Gonis, Mr. Joe Mathews and other officers collaborating as cohorts in cahoots with Westpac Banking Corporation officials, all up to their neck in collusion, sabotaging and civil death plot’s to implemented assist ‘AGSCSA.”20. Because of the Magistrates S .M. Dermot Kehoe’s negative verdict favouring AGSCSA.” They were free to dispose of MDAM’S Property whilst the Westpac Banking Corporation officials could claim any equity remaining in the property in question after probably rigged auction sales had taken place. Thus we discover that the Legal Profession and its legally connected bank officials that work together as a well drilled vile evil team, of ambushing beleaguering besieging team to surround their victim with “Anfractus” unfathomable anathema legal intracacasies beyond the comprehension of ordinary every day people routinely scheduled to be robbed whilst blindly trusting their devious rulers.21. MDAM then as a consequence of these events, began to realize, that like other masses of other people, are regarded as the unqualified electorate, all regarded as legal profession outcasts, often disparaged and belittled by the legal profession who refer to members of the unqualified electorate, meaning that they were unqualified in law and therefore being called “Frivolous” which is a belittling snide sneering sarcastic satire legal “AGSCSA.” profession remark that means: -

What Frivolous people should know and don’t seem to know: Who do you think you are you numbskull nitwit void of legal writ? Can't you get it into your Blockhead, that you have no legal capacity, because you are

not legally qualified in matters of law, and that we of the legal confraternity, regard it as very offensive and obnoxious, when legally unqualified “noodle brained dumb clucks and ” all “addleheaded people” that rise above their lower layman serf station, status in life and assume that they have the mental capacity to do higher devious deceptive public depriving thinking, at our higher legal profession level, which is forbidden for laypeople to do and un-acceptable to us.

Don’t you know that we make up unwritten law simply to suit us and that your elected voted for parliamentarians are only obligated to pass the laws that we make

9

and that we of the un-voted for self appointed legal fraternity that can’t be voted in or out of their permanent positions of power that we have permanently seized as our sole possession to be kept separate from the masses whilst we protect ourselves through judicial independence that makes us (the rulers) independent from all the ordinary people.

Can’t you perceive that we the un-elected rulers supervise all your parliamentarians, who have to take our advices and to obey their direction and obey their orders?

Haven’t you seen the speaker in parliament wearing our black priestly robes and gowns sitting on an elevated chair, with two other black priestly robed assistants sitting at either side or end of the bar table to assist the supervision of voted for parliamentarians being directed and controlled by un-voted for members representing the un-voted legal profession?

Haven’t you noticed that we also have an elevated parliamentary president and two assistants sitting at the bar table supervising voted for parliamentarians to ensure they conduct themselves according to our directions, whilst the parliamentarians seemingly act in a sensible manner whilst they are rather performing ‘Adumbration’ obscuration overshadowing allegoric drama mock eloquent oratorical performances, that bamboozle the masses with repetitive platitude constant clap trap?

Cant you figure it out that you are forbidden to speak as a “Diepnosophist” learnedly from the bar table that bar’s you concerning matters of your interest and concerning forbidden matters of law as well as in all legal proceedings and processes, especially in courts where ordinary peoples speech is herd but not taken any notice of when what is being said is not subordinate?

Will you ever wake up to the fact that we have recorded every possible loophole used in previous cases to use against you by simply looking for an ancient precedent to use as a mould template, to squeeze into matters that concern your particular court proceedings, regardless of weather the chosen selected precedent fits or not, the idea is simply that the inapplicable precedent can be argued for many expensive hours, so as to clock up great expenses on the legal profession hour meter, that you will be required to pay for a banal platitude bafflegab time wasting plot ploy to also run up high costs of court that you will be expected to pay?

How can you be so naive and mentally retarded to assume that you can delve into the deeper finer Higher points of law whilst you are legally unqualified and totally unable to construe the patent letters of the law that you are not familiar with yet continue to make matters worse, by quoting law acts that you are not trained to fully comprehend and construe?

You have to learn the hard way that we conduct our law, not your law, strictly according to “jus dividendi” which means that you have to be alienated from all reality, in such a way that you will not ever be able to prove any point in law, regardless of what legal dictionaries construe the words of law to mean something in a worldly every day literal sense way that cannot dive down under legal profession word’s to discover their true meanings hidden from the masses..

As members of the masses you are considered to be sall ament’s all Void of legal capacity, you are not likely to ever become aware that lex non scripta means Latin for unwritten law, means judicial cognizance which means that a member of the legal profession simply makes up on the spot law to suit their whims which are imposed on people that are seizing his money and closing his loan account because he is a member of the lower class, considered to be members of the common rank and file riffraff ableless person, that makes up the masses all deserving to be common people deprived of all dignity and to denied “divine law protection” and deserve to be judged on un-

10

written law called common law to mislead victims relying on common law not suspecting legal treachery secret legal agenda known only to the legal profession initiated in the know.

22. MDAM now knowing that That Justice Means: -Fairness in dealing with “others” because the word “other” means (Ander) which means the other people that have not been regarded with “Fairness” meaning equitableness, in the sense that they the other people not of us, should not be acquitted of solicitor false accusations as amply seen in their authored affidavits they inveigle their conscious or semi conscious assistants or chosen people to sign, bringing the conviction to a close, that is regarded as the end of the matter and a conviction without solid grounds being required. Oh! Oh! No wonder MDAM does not want to ever enter a contaminated court again. 23. MDAM Had to find another way to deal with the wrongdoing Legal Profession that was discovered to be effective by using excuria out of court methods of retaliation, this method was especially effective in an Extra Judicial, Excuria way that bypassed all legal profession circumlocutions in litigation and also avoid all legal “parable allegory”, “Figurative symbolic language-requiring interpretation not available to the uninformed naïve masses….”24. Consequently an “Excoria” and “Extra Judicial” technique had to be used against “AGSCSA.” With excellent results that caused them to fail to carry out Magistrates Court orders placed on MDAM property and not seize the property and possess it according to the conviction order of Brisbane Magistrate S .M. Dermot Kehoe. “AGS-CSA officers.” Began to panic and they abanded there corrupt property seizing plot on MDAM’S property. 25. This prooves that the 9 years of trechery torture torment and persecution, they had imposed on MDAM as an Imposture = Deception by false pretense of Latrocinor = Robery and piracy, as Likewise imposed on thousands of defencless naieve masses of victims, who have been beliegured and beseiged by this corrupt legal profession under the direction of the AustralianFederal Government and their equally corrupt phony Child Support Agency masqurading as a clandestin tax investigation agency in disguise .26. Oh! Yes! At last they have been caught out and cornered by one of their victims who has conducted ample reconoitering reconnance on “AGSCSA.” And other legal profession that provides ample evidence to warrant a petition to other victims and likely victims, to close the whole legal profession down for public safety reasons, and to protect children by preventing them from loosing their inheritance in legal profession and court costs, which the father is forced to pay. Fathers have to “extirpate” pull up by the roots to put an end to this vile “ legalocracy “democracy that has an agenda that is not what old soldiers fought and died for under the indoctrination of legal profession directed political leaders. 27. This turn of events has left The Westpac Banking Corporation and their Officials Mr. Peter Scalzi, Mr. Terri Gonis, Mr. Joe Mathews and other Officers has left them “ High and Dry” having Frozen MDAM”S finances entrusted to their bank that also canceling the loan account agreement they had falsely made with MDAM that they treacherously cancelled without any justification purely and simply for the purpose off underhandedly assisting the Australian Federal Government Solicitors and their phony Child Support Agency to ruin MDAM. Who was Financially deprive of his dignity and caused to be so impoverished that he could not do anything to assist himself from the massive legal profession onslaught.28. Then The Westpac Banking Corporation Officials realized the trouble they unexpectedly found themselves to be in when the Australian Federal Government Solicitor and the Child Support agency caved in and collapsed in regard to their devious actions, they had been ceaselessly unrelentingly constantly been imposing on MDAM for 9 years that suddenly ceased, due to “Excoria” and Extra Judicial pressure imposed on them by MDAM. 29. They then informed the Westpac Banking Corporation officials that they had informed the caveat officials that their caveat was still in existence. This then caused Westpac banking

11

Corporation officials to seek a way to get themselves out of the mess they had got themselves into, this caused them to employ a legal practitioner to help get them out of their self imposed mess, and give them directions.30. Consequently they employed Minter Ellison Lawyers and their “Solicitor Melinda Smith” and the Solicitor responsible. David O’Brien, they hatched a devious specious perjured plot, full of false pretence false fallacies, and false pretext etc, this plot was evidently too far beyond The Solicitors handbook directions under diligence, that stated clearly: -

A practitioner shall not accept instructions from a client that are beyond his competence, as Solicitor “Melinda Smith” and Solicitor responsible “David O’Brien” has done.

31. Clearly they have not been diligent enough in regards to protecting their clients, the Westpac Banking Corporation, who they obviously encouraged to become false plantiffs acting on a fraudulent trumped set of perjured accusations:

The one is that MDAM was a defendant when the opposite is the case, because MDAM did not do anything untoward to the Westpac Banking CorporationMDAM did not put an illegal freeze on their money and he did not cancel his loan account with them.32. The Westpac Banking Corporation did those wrong deeds, with malice to MDAM instead. They had no grounds to justify their devious actions, which they have no to face. That can lead to a massive counter retaliation, that will blemish their reputation beyond recovery, once the public find out about their underhanded skullduggery.33. Who would ever put their trust in such a Bank, who would freeze their clients money in their safekeeping, and also break their loan agreement they had with their client and likewise break the fiduciary trust with the client, and then actually collude with the Australian Federal Government Solicitor and the Child Support Agency.34. It is also dissapointing to discover that the Westpac Banking Corporation Officials would stoop so low, to impose the corrupt activities on MDAM or anyone else. 35. As a consequence the Westpac Banking Corporation is facing the revoking of their Banking Corporation license in the interest of the public and all their clients whilst their Solicitors Minter Ellison Lawyers and their Solicitors “Melinda Smith” and the Lawyer responsible, “David O’Brien” all have to be struch off the legal practitioners list because of their bad conduct and for jeopardizing their client Westpac Banking Corporation by encouraging them to become false default plaintiffs and in so doing exposing themselves to the retribution they now have to face from MDAM. 36. Then to make matters even worse The Westpac Banking Corporation officials allowed their solicitors to deceive them and inveigle them into becoming fraudulent perjured Supreme Court default Plaintiffs, pretending that MDAM had failed to meet his obligations concerning his funds they had seized illegally, and then falsely claim that MDAM had not met his loan account obligations to justify their false default judgment, when they had cancelled MDAM’s account. 37. Minter Ellison and their Solicitors “Melinda Smith” and Lawyer responsible. “David O’Brien and the Westpac Banking Corporation officials and Mr. Peter Scalzi, Mr. Terri Gonis, Mr. Joe Mathews and other Officers have engaged in extremely underhanded activities that have now have backfired on them very badly and Minter Ellison Lawyers and Solicitor “Melinda Smith” and Solicitor Responsible. “David O’Brien have neglected to act responsibly to their client the Westpac Banking Corporation by draughting up the fraudulent default judgment and negligently writing the Westpac Banking Corporations Name on that false default judgment document as the plaintiff thus tying the Westpac

12

Banking Corporation into the Minter Ellison default judgment which then incriminated the Supreme Court and its registrars Mr. Toogood and Mrs. McDonnell 38. The Supreme Court of Brisbane has now also become implicated as accessories in the misconduct of Minter Ellison Lawyers and their solicitors “Melinda Smith” and Mr.” David O’Brien” who due to their misconduct have implicated the Supreme Court Registrars Mr. Toogood and deputy registrar Mrs. L McDonnell.

The schedule of wrong doers shown below demonstrates the immensity of the corrupt activists Involved in this matter for the whole of Australia and the rest of the world to discover

The Schedule Of Beleaguering Besieging Culprits.2. The Australian Government’s. Prime Minister, Commander In Chief Mr. Howard

2. The .. .. .. .. .. Solicitor’s Office. 3. The .. .. .. .. Solicitor Mr. Ian Andersen. 4. The .. .. .. .. .. Spokesman Mr. Silver 5. The .. .. .. .. .. Parliamentarians Concerned Yet To be named. 6. The .. .. .. .. .. Brisbane Child Support Agency CSA 7. The .. .. .. .. .. CSA Catharine Argall, Registrar. 8. The .. .. .. .. .. CSA Danielle McIsaac Admin P.S. Grade 6. 9. The .. .. .. .. .. CSA Edwina Horder –Smith Admin P. S Grade 5. 10. The .. .. .. .. .. CSA Angela Tillmanns Regional Registrar. 11. The .. .. .. .. .. CSA Allison Millet Regional Registrar. 12. The .. .. .. .. .. CSA M. Brennen Officer.

14. The Queensland State Government’s Premier Mr. Beattie. 14. The .. .. .. Parliamentarians To be named . 15. The .. .. .. Brisbane Magistrates Court. 16. The .. .. .. .. Magistrates. Court. 17. The .. .. .. .. Magistrate B. Hine 18. The .. .. .. .. Magistrate S .M. Dermot Kehoe.

34. The Westpac Banking Corporation Officials.35. The Westpac Bank Mr. Peter Scalzi.36. The Westpac Bank Mr. Terri Gonis.37. The Westpac Bank Mr. Joe Mathews.38. The Westpac Bank Appointed Brisbane Lawyers Minter Ellison39. The Westpac Bank Appointed Brisbane Lawyers Minter Ellison Solicitor Melinda Smith40. The Westpac Bank Solicitor Responsible. David O’Brien.41. The Westpac Banking Corporation.42. The Queensland State 43. The Queensland State Prosecuting Registrar SPER A Queensland State furtive intimidating Extortionist fraudulent despot dictator summary arbitrary phony routine false conviction concern Falsely called a court.44. The Australian Federal State And Judicial System45. The Queensland state Police Force and public offending officers46. The Queensland Police Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners.47. Supreme Court of Brisbane and its registrars,

The above listed culprits have all been rounded up and accounted for and will have to seek a lawyer to

13

Represent them in an effort to save them certain repercussion“Meyrick Douglas Aplin Mytton”Care of the manager Westpac Banking Corporation159 Morayfield RoadMorayfield QLD 4500

MDAM. “Meyrick Douglas Aplin Mytton” requires a reply from the persons The Schedule of Beleaguering Besieging Culprits mentioned above within fourteen working days after receiving this Communication after which if there is no reply the necessary adequate retribution will be put into practice.

A Tender Of Amends Is Required To The Satisfaction Of

“Meyrick Douglas Aplin Mytton”To Be Presented By A Competent Person.

The Government and the Judiciary need not think that the dismissal of Court Registrars such as: Mr. Toogood and other parasites is going to exonerate their crimes in the disenfranchised general public argues eyes that the legal system is credible and conducts its charter with the best interest of the community as paramount. It is time for all wrongdoers in the aforementioned MDAM correspondence to assess your own individual position and liability in the matters above, as all wrongdoers will inevitably be brought to account for their wrongdoing by the awakening alerted public.

DISCLAIMER: The contents of this document is not subject to my faith, opinion or belief, this correspondence has been directed by ‘The Extra Excuria Anti-Judicial Script Analysis Team’, the final question is:-

IS IT TRUE?

Mutatis Mutandis Mutation MDAM.

14