Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Biometry for Premium IOLs 2015
Jack T. Holladay MD MSEE FACS Page 1 of 9
3/23/2015 JTH 1
The Promise of No Glasses
or Contact Lenses !
Jack T. Holladay, MD, MSEE, FACSClinical Professor of Ophthalmology
Baylor College of MedicineHouston, Tx WWW.AAO.ORG
0
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Financial Disclosure I have the following financial interests or relationships to disclose: Abbott Medical Optics: C;
AcuFocus, Inc.: C,O;
Alcon Laboratories, Inc.: C;
ArcScan: C,O;
Carl Zeiss Inc: C;
Elenza: C,O;
Oculus, Inc.: C;
Visiometrics: C,O;
Wavetec: C
3/23/2015 JTH 57
www.docholladay.com
Handouts
3/23/2015 JTH 6
Requirements Centration
Accurate Biometry – Optical
(IOL Master or LenStar)
Accurate K’s- Repeatable
4th Generation Formula (WTW)
Personalized Lens Constant
Eliminate Corneal Astigmatism
3/23/2015 JTH 7
Multifocal IOLOptimal Location
Cannot place on Pupil Center & Visual Axis (near P1) where axial ray is perpendicular to foveola.
Optimal location is different for each patient and somewhere between Pupil Center & P1.
3/23/2015 JTH 8
ClinicalAngle Kappa
Pupil Centerto Visual Axis
NOSE
Biometry for Premium IOLs 2015
Jack T. Holladay MD MSEE FACS Page 2 of 9
3/23/2015 JTH 9
Horizontal Angle & Alpha & Kappa
OCPC
VA
< α< Κ
3/23/2015 JTH 10
Good centration ,optimal
optical performance?
Decentration: halos Poor vision for farand near
Courtesy Paolo Vinciguerra M.D.
3/23/2015 JTH 11Diffraction Rings are perfectly concentric with patient’s pupil
Courtesy Paolo Vinciguerra M.D.
3/23/2015 JTH 12
3/23/2015 JTH 133/23/2015 Jack T. Holladay, MD, MSEE, FACS9 T S1 SS7 3/23/2015 JTH 143/23/2015 Jack T. Holladay, MD, MSEE, FACS
9 T S1 SS7
Biometry for Premium IOLs 2015
Jack T. Holladay MD MSEE FACS Page 3 of 9
Regression plot between the photic phenomenon of haloes (x axis) and the
kappa angle (y axis).
(R2 = 0.26, P = 0.029)
N = 37Zero = 25Non zero = 12
Regression plot between the photic phenomenon of glare (x axis) and the kappa
angle (y axis)
(R2 = 0.26, P = 0.033)
N = 37Zero = 30Non zero = 7
Horizontal Angle & Alpha & Kappa
OCPC
VA
< α< Κ
BEST CENTRATIONOF IOL
3/23/2015 JTH 18
Horizontal Angle & Alpha & Kappa
PCVA
< Κ
Angle Kappa on IOL Master, LenStar and penlight ~ 0.33 mm
If > 0.70 mm then concern!
●Karhanová M, Marešová K, Pluháček F, Mlčák P, Vláčil O, Sín M. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. The importance of angle kappa for centration of multifocal intraocular lenses. 2013 Jun;69(2):64-8. [Article in Czech]● G Prakash, DR Prakash, A Agarwal, DA Kumar, A Agarwal and S Jacob. Predictive factor and kappa angle analysis for visual satisfactions in patients with multifocal IOL implantation. Eye (2011) 25, 1187–1193
3/23/2015 JTH 193/23/2015 Jack T. Holladay, MD, MSEE, FACS
Ideal LocationLeft Eye
Between Pupil Center and Purkinje Image 1 (Vertex Normal Light Reflex)Slightly NASAL to Pupil Center (~ 0.15 mm) 3/23/2015 JTH 20
LENSTAR – HAAG-STREIT
Biometry for Premium IOLs 2015
Jack T. Holladay MD MSEE FACS Page 4 of 9
3/23/2015 JTH 21
IOL MASTER - ZEISS
3/23/2015 JTH 22
3/23/2015 JTH 23
Subtractfrom Ascanmeasured
Axial Length~ 0.8 mm
Zeiss - IOL Master - 2000Zaldivar-Holladay JCRS May 2000
3/23/2015 JTH 24
J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37:2018–2027
3/23/2015 JTH 25
Linear Regression to compensate for AVERAGE Index of Refraction in Long Eyes
Measured 36 34 mm
3/23/2015 JTH 26
Requirements
Accurate Biometry – IOL Master
Accurate K’s- Repeatable
4th Generation Formula (WTW)
Personalized Lens Constant
Eliminate Corneal Astigmatism
Biometry for Premium IOLs 2015
Jack T. Holladay MD MSEE FACS Page 5 of 9
3/23/2015 JTH 27
IOL Power Calculations Pentacam can measure FRONT &
BACK SURFACE POWER
Can Calculate: Equivalent K-Reading (EKR)
65% Mean, Peak & Average
NET POWER3/23/2015 JTH 28
EKR Reports Keratometry value but adjusts
for Back Surface Power from Normal (Current IOL Formulas)
If corneal front surface is 7.5 mm (45 D), but if back surface -0.3 D > normal:
EKR = 45.0 – 0.3 = 44.7 D
Note: Net Power = 43.3 D
3/23/2015 JTH 29
J Cataract Refract Surg Feb 2015; 41:339–347
3/23/2015 JTH 30Holladay Report Equivalent K-Reading
EKR65
3/23/2015 JTH 31 3/23/2015 JTH 32
IOL Calcs – Abnormal Cornea(Use 65% MEAN EKR) Post Refractive Surgery
Post PKP
Keratoconus
Corneal Scar
Any Irregular Astigmatism
Biometry for Premium IOLs 2015
Jack T. Holladay MD MSEE FACS Page 6 of 9
3/23/2015 JTH 33
Use 65% Mean EKR( @ 4.5, 4 & 3 mm zones)
3/23/2015 JTH 34
Normal LASIK RK41 to 44 D3 D Range
36 to 41 D5 D Range
32 to 45 D13 D Range
3/23/2015 JTH 35
POST LASIK
3/23/2015 JTH 36
Post LASIK CALC Kmean = 39.8 D
Used 39.8 D => SEQ = +1.12 D
(+1.00 + 0.25 X 155 = 20/20)
65% mean = 38.8 D => +0.12 D
Use 65% mean K
3/23/2015 JTH 37
Conclusions EKR – Use 65% Mean for all
IOL Calcs
Look @ smaller zones than 4.5 mm if pupil very small
(< 3.0 mm in dim light)3/23/2015 JTH 38
Requirements
Accurate Biometry – IOL Master
Accurate K’s- Repeatable
4th Generation Formula (WTW)
Personalized Lens Constant
Eliminate Corneal Astigmatism
Biometry for Premium IOLs 2015
Jack T. Holladay MD MSEE FACS Page 7 of 9
3/23/2015 JTH 39
Vergence Formula
IOLAL ELP
DPostRxV
K(Post R)ELP
1336 13361336
10001000
3/23/2015 JTH 40
3/23/2015 JTH 41
CONCLUSION: 9 EYES
Ant
erio
r S
egm
ent S
ize
Axial LengthShort Normal Long
Large
Normal
Small
Megalocornea Large Eye
+ axial Megalocornea Buphthalmos
hyperopia Megalocornea
+ axial myopia
axial hyperopia normal axial myopia
Small eye Microcornea
Nanophthalmia Microcornea + axial mopia
(20%)
(10%)(2%)
(2%)
(80%) (96%) (90%)
(0%)
(0%)
3/23/2015 JTH 42
Measurements taken forPredictors of ELP
Axial Length
Average K (Pre Ref)
Horizontal WTW
ACD
LT
Pre-opRefraction
Age
3/23/2015 JTH 43
FORMULA PERFORMANCE
15 20 25 300
12
34
56
Axial Length (mm)Mea
n A
bsol
ute
Err
or (
D)
Holladay 1Hoffer QSRK/THolladay 2
N = 997
3/23/2015 JTH 44
Requirements
Accurate Biometry – IOL Master
Accurate K’s- Repeatable
4th Generation Formula (WTW)
Personalized Lens Constant
Eliminate Corneal Astigmatism
Biometry for Premium IOLs 2015
Jack T. Holladay MD MSEE FACS Page 8 of 9
3/23/2015 JTH 45
Personalized Lens Constant Never use Manufacturer’s Constant
except to start 20 to 40 cases and continue Factors IOL Style Lens placement Post op medications Biometer, keratometer, …
3/23/2015 JTH 46
Requirements
Accurate Biometry – IOL Master
Accurate K’s- Repeatable
4th Generation Formula (WTW)
Personalized Lens Constant
Eliminate Corneal Astigmatism
TORIC IOL Calculations Commercial Calculators use a constant ratio (1.46) for
the corneal cylinder to the IOL cylinder
Exact Calculation depends on IOL SEQ Power and ELP… to correct 2D of corneal astigmatism
10 D IOL => 3.5 D Cylinder
22 D IOL => 2.9 D Cylinder
34 D IOL => 2.4 D Cylinder
A 1.1 D difference from 10 D to 34 D!3/23/2015 JTH 48
3/23/2015 JTH 49
Toric Optimization
3/23/2015 JTH 50
Biometry for Premium IOLs 2015
Jack T. Holladay MD MSEE FACS Page 9 of 9
3/23/2015 JTH 51
PREOP 6 D Toric IOLLEF
3/23/2015 JTH 52
PREOP 6 D Toric IOL -- ODLEF
3/23/2015 JTH 53
PREOP 6 D Toric IOL -- OSLEF
3/23/2015 JTH 54
!Thank You!