March 2015

JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY

KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD.NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD.

CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.FUTABA INC.

THE REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUSMINISTRY OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND LAND TRANSPORT (MPI)

GE

JR

15-044

THE PROJECT OF LANDSLIDE MANAGEMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF

MAURITIUS

FINAL REPORTMAIN REPORT

March 2015

JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY

KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD.NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD.

CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.FUTABA INC.

THE REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUSMINISTRY OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND LAND TRANSPORT (MPI)

THE PROJECT OF LANDSLIDE MANAGEMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF

MAURITIUS

FINAL REPORTMAIN REPORT

Location Map

LLooccaattiioonn ooff SSttuuddyy AArreeaa

80°0'0"E

80°0'0"E

70°0'0"E

70°0'0"E

60°0'0"E

60°0'0"E

50°0'0"E

50°0'0"E

40°0'0"E

40°0'0"E

30°0'0"E

30°0'0"E

20°0'0"E

20°0'0"E

20

°0'0

"N

20

°0'0

"N

10

°0'0

"N

10

°0'0

"N

0°0

'0"

0°0

'0"

10

°0'0

"S

10

°0'0

"S

20

°0'0

"S

20

°0'0

"S

0 1,000 2,000500km

Republic of Mauritius

DDeettaaiill MMaapp

Quatre Soeurs

Chitrakoot

La Butte

Vallee Pitot

Rate of Currency Translation

1 USD = 34.959 Rs

= 119.68 JPY

100 Rs = 3.098 USD

= 370.75 JPY Rs: Mauritius Rupee

As of March 1st, 2015

Photos of the Project (1)

Courtesy visit to the Deputy Prime Minister and

Minister of MPI, 28th May 2012

Conclusion on commencement of the Project, 30th

May 2012

1st Steering Committee, 29th May 2012 2nd Steering Committee, 1st Nov. 2012

3rd Steering Committee, 21st Nov. 2013 4th Steering Committee, 19th Jan. 2015

Photos of the Project (2)

1st Stakeholder Meeting (Chitrakoot), 22nd Sep.

2012

2nd Stakeholder Meeting (Quatre Soeurs), 12th Apr.

2013

5th Stakeholder Meeting (Vallee Pitot), 12th Dec.

2014

1st Technical Transfer Seminar, 10th Oct. 2012

2nd Technical Transfer Seminar, 20th Nov. 2013 3rd Technical Transfer Seminar, 20th Jan. 2015

Photos of the Project (3)

Site visit by IOC, 13th Jun. 2012 4th Technical Workshop 【Landuse Policy】, 30th

Jul. 2012

5th Technical Workshop 【Aerial Photo

Interpretation】, 6th Sep. 2012

10th Technical Workshop 【Stability Analysis and

Countermeasures】, 5th Mar. 2013

1st Training in Japan,

24th Nov. ~ 15th Dec. 2012

2nd Training in Japan,

17th Aug. ~ 8th Sep. 2013

Photos of the Project (4)

Boring Survey (Quatre Soeurs), 2nd Oct. 2012 Technical Guidance on Horizontal Drilling for

Landslide Countermeasure Works (Chitrakoot),

30th Oct. 2014

2nd Site Meeting for the Construction of Landslide

Countermeasure Works (Chitrakoot), 1st Sep. 2014

Completed Countermeasure Work 【River

Type-3】, 12th Dec. 2014

Completed Countermeasure Work 【Bridge

Type-3】, 12th Dec. 2014

Completed Countermeasure Work 【Horizontal

Drainage】, 12th Dec. 2014

i

CONTENTS

Location Map

Photos

Contents

List of Figures

List of Tables

List of Photos

Abbreviations

Digest

Page

1 Introduction .................................................................................. 1-1

1.1 General ..................................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 Background of the Project ......................................................................... 1-1

1.3 Objectives of the Project ........................................................................... 1-2 1.3.1 Objective ......................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3.2 Desired Outcome ............................................................................................ 1-2 1.3.3 Outcome of the Project ................................................................................... 1-2

1.4 Scope of the Project .................................................................................. 1-3 1.4.1 Project Areas ................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4.2 List of JICA Expert Team and Counterparts ................................................... 1-4

1.5 Major Activities .......................................................................................... 1-5

2 Basic Survey ................................................................................. 2-1

2.1 Topography ............................................................................................... 2-1

2.2 Geology and Rainfall ................................................................................. 2-2

2.3 Landslide Inventory Survey ....................................................................... 2-5 2.3.1 Classification of Hazard Area ......................................................................... 2-7 2.3.2 Site Reconnaissance ........................................................................................ 2-9 2.3.3 Inventory and Location Map ......................................................................... 2-17 2.3.4 GIS Database ................................................................................................ 2-21

2.4 Existing Countermeasures ...................................................................... 2-25 2.4.1 Structural Countermeasures .......................................................................... 2-25 2.4.2 Non-Structural Countermeasures .................................................................. 2-26

2.5 Social Survey .......................................................................................... 2-28 2.5.1 Basic Information Survey ............................................................................. 2-28 2.5.2 Attitude Survey about Landslide Disasters ............................................. 2-34

2.6 Organizations and Systems .................................................................... 2-38 2.6.1 Organizational and Institutional Formation .................................................. 2-38

2.7 Economic Survey .................................................................................... 2-43 2.7.1 National Economic Indicators ....................................................................... 2-43 2.7.2 National Economic Policies in Mauritius ..................................................... 2-44 2.7.3 Fiscal Policy for 2014 ................................................................................... 2-46

ii

2.7.4 Fiscal Policy of the Ministry of Public Infrastructure (MPI) 2014-2016 ...... 2-47 2.7.5 Budget for LMU ........................................................................................... 2-49

3 Landslide Management Plan 1 (Survey and Results) ................ 3-1

3.1 Landslide Hazard Area .............................................................................. 3-1

3.2 Topographic Survey .................................................................................. 3-3 3.2.1 Specifications .................................................................................................. 3-3 3.2.2 Deliverables .................................................................................................... 3-3

3.3 Geological Survey ..................................................................................... 3-7 3.3.1 Geology of the Landslide Area ....................................................................... 3-7 3.3.2 Laboratory Test ............................................................................................. 3-11 3.3.3 Water Quality Analysis ................................................................................. 3-31

3.4 Monitoring ............................................................................................... 3-35 3.4.1 Installation of Monitoring Devices ............................................................... 3-35 3.4.2 Monitoring Results ........................................................................................ 3-38

3.5 Geophysical Exploration ......................................................................... 3-50 3.5.1 Elastic Wave Exploration.............................................................................. 3-50 3.5.2 Two-Dimensional Resistivity Exploration .................................................... 3-59

3.6 Drilling Survey ......................................................................................... 3-68 3.6.1 Drilling Plan .................................................................................................. 3-68 3.6.2 Core Drilling ................................................................................................. 3-70 3.6.3 Installation of Observation Equipment ......................................................... 3-73 3.6.4 Drilling Results ............................................................................................. 3-78 3.6.5 Standard Penetration Test ............................................................................. 3-79

3.7 Field Reconnaissance ............................................................................. 3-82 3.7.1 Damage to Houses ........................................................................................ 3-82 3.7.2 Results of Field Reconnaissance ................................................................... 3-89

3.8 Disaster Inspection ................................................................................ 3-120 3.8.1 Significance and Objectives of Disaster Inspection .................................... 3-121 3.8.2 Method of Disaster Inspection .................................................................... 3-122 3.8.3 Results of Disaster Inspection ..................................................................... 3-122 3.8.4 Recommendation on Disaster Inspection .................................................... 3-125

3.9 Review and Recommendations for the Disaster Scheme ..................... 3-128 3.9.1 Review of the Existing Warning System of Landslides in Mauritius ......... 3-128 3.9.2 Recommendation for the Disaster Scheme ................................................. 3-131

3.10 Review and Recommendations for the Planning Policy Guidance ....... 3-150 3.10.1 Review of Japanese Legal Systems for Landslide Countermeasures .......... 3-151 3.10.2 The existing Legal Systems/schemes for LDRM in Mauritius ................... 3-157 3.10.3 Existing Situation of Landslide Prone Areas in Mauritius .......................... 3-159 3.10.4 Recommendation of PPG ............................................................................ 3-166

3.11 Technical Guideline for Initial Survey .................................................... 3-179

3.12 Procedure Manual for Landslide ........................................................... 3-181

4 Landslide Management Plan 2 (Analysis and Interpretation) ... 4-1

4.1 Geological Interpretation ........................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Chitrakoot ....................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Quatre Soeurs .................................................................................................. 4-4 4.1.3 Vallee Pitot ..................................................................................................... 4-6

4.2 Interpretation of Monitoring ....................................................................... 4-8

iii

4.2.1 Chitrakoot ....................................................................................................... 4-8 4.2.2 Quatre Soeurs ................................................................................................ 4-11 4.2.3 Vallee Pitot ................................................................................................... 4-12

4.3 Consideration of Threshold for Soil Water Index .................................... 4-13 4.3.1 Method of Analysis ....................................................................................... 4-13 4.3.2 Data ............................................................................................................... 4-15 4.3.3 Result of SWI Calculation ............................................................................ 4-18 4.3.4 Introduction of SWI in Mauritius .................................................................. 4-26

4.4 Stability Analysis ..................................................................................... 4-28 4.4.1 Factor of Safety ............................................................................................. 4-28 4.4.2 Setting Parameters ........................................................................................ 4-30 4.4.3 Method of Stability Analysis ........................................................................ 4-31 4.4.4 Stability Analysis .......................................................................................... 4-33 4.4.5 Evaluation of the Soil Strength ..................................................................... 4-48

4.5 Susceptibility Assessment ....................................................................... 4-51

5 Feasibility Study ........................................................................... 5-1

5.1 Priority Site and Pilot Project site .............................................................. 5-1 5.1.1 Selection of Priority Site ................................................................................. 5-1 5.1.2 Selection of Pilot Project Site ......................................................................... 5-2 5.1.3 Disaster Scenario at the Pilot Project Site ....................................................... 5-3

5.2 Policy of Countermeasures ....................................................................... 5-6 5.2.1 Plan for Countermeasures Works in Chitrakoot ............................................. 5-7 5.2.2 Emergency Works in Vallee Pitot ................................................................. 5-18 5.2.3 Relocation in Quatre Soeurs ......................................................................... 5-24

5.3 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) ................................................ 5-26 5.3.1 Procedure of Environmental Impact Assessment.......................................... 5-26 5.3.2 EIA Related to Pilot Project .......................................................................... 5-28 5.3.3 Main Environmental and Social Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............. 5-29

5.4 Pilot Project Evaluation ........................................................................... 5-30 5.4.1 Pre Evaluation ............................................................................................... 5-30 5.4.2 Interim Review .............................................................................................. 5-32 5.4.3 Post Evaluation ............................................................................................. 5-34

5.5 Promotion of Fund Raising ...................................................................... 5-36

5.6 Organizational Reinforcement Plan ........................................................ 5-41 5.6.1 Capacity Development Plan .......................................................................... 5-41 5.6.2 Landslide Management Unit (LMU) in MPI ................................................ 5-41 5.6.3 Issues, Goals and Activities in Capacity Development for Medium and Long

Term Plan ...................................................................................................... 5-43 5.6.4 Outcomes Achieved and Future Capacity Development Plan ...................... 5-47

6 Pilot Project (Landslide Countermeasures) ............................... 6-1

6.1 Structural Countermeasures ..................................................................... 6-1 6.1.1 Basic design of Countermeasure Works ......................................................... 6-1 6.1.2 Detailed Design of Countermeasure Works in Chitrakoot .............................. 6-9 6.1.3 Plan for Construction .................................................................................... 6-21 6.1.4 Preparation of Bidding Documents and Bidding .......................................... 6-23 6.1.5 Supervision ................................................................................................... 6-29 6.1.6 Design Changes ............................................................................................ 6-29 6.1.7 Future Plan .................................................................................................... 6-30 6.1.8 Available Countermeasure Works in Mauritius ............................................ 6-34 6.1.9 Development in the Landslide Hazard Zone after the Landslide

iv

Countermeasure Works ............................................................................... 6-35

6.2 Early Warning and Evacuation ................................................................ 6-37 6.2.1 Present Situation and Issue in Mauritius ....................................................... 6-37 6.2.2 Proposal of Early Warning and Evacuation System ..................................... 6-39 6.2.3 Establishment of Early Warning and Evacuation System ............................. 6-48

6.3 Information, Education and Communication (IEC) .................................. 6-53 6.3.1 IEC in the Landslide Management Project ................................................... 6-53 6.3.2 Current Status and Issues of IEC activities in the Field of Landslide

Management in Mauritius ............................................................................ 6-53 6.3.3 IEC Activities to be Implemented by the Project .......................................... 6-56 6.3.4 Stakeholder Meeting for Residents at Priority Areas .................................... 6-57 6.3.5 Questionnaire Survey for Residents at Three Priority Area .......................... 6-66 6.3.6 Project Newsletter ......................................................................................... 6-69 6.3.7 IEC Material - Landslide Disaster Prevention Handbook - .......................... 6-69

6.4 Technical Summary of the Pilot Project .................................................. 6-71

7 Technical Transfer ........................................................................ 7-1

7.1 Methodology .............................................................................................. 7-1 7.1.1 Objectives of Technical Transfer .................................................................... 7-1 7.1.2 Method of Technical Transfer ......................................................................... 7-1 7.1.3 Basic policy of Technical Transfer ................................................................. 7-2

7.2 Structure of Technical Transfer ................................................................. 7-3

7.3 Technical Transfer Seminar ...................................................................... 7-4 7.3.1 1st Technical Transfer Seminar ....................................................................... 7-4 7.3.2 2nd Technical Transfer Seminar ...................................................................... 7-4 7.3.3 3rd Technical Transfer Seminar ....................................................................... 7-6

7.4 Workshop .................................................................................................. 7-7

7.5 Training in Japan ..................................................................................... 7-16

7.6 Steering Committee ................................................................................ 7-21

7.7 Advisory Committee in Japan ................................................................. 7-26

7.8 Results of Technical Transfer ................................................................. 7-29

7.9 Future Plans by MPI and the Related Organizations .............................. 7-32 7.9.1 Future Plans by MPI ..................................................................................... 7-32 7.9.2 Future Plans by the Related Organizations ................................................... 7-35

8 Environment, Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Management ................................................................................. 8-1

8.1 General ..................................................................................................... 8-1

8.2 Landslide Management and the Environment, Climate Change Adaptation

and Disaster Management ........................................................................ 8-3

8.3 The Project and Related Organizations .................................................... 8-4 8.3.1 Government Agencies and Organization of Mauritius ................................... 8-4 8.3.2 Development Partners ..................................................................................... 8-5

8.4 Summary on Environment, Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Management by JICA ................................................................................ 8-9

8.5 Technical Exchange with the Southwest Indian Ocean Islands .............. 8-12 8.5.1 Summary of the Regional Seminar ............................................................... 8-13

v

9 Proposal for Future Tasks ........................................................... 9-1

9.1 Proposal on a Landslide Management Plan ............................................. 9-1 9.1.1 Disaster Inspection .......................................................................................... 9-1 9.1.2 Disaster Scheme .............................................................................................. 9-1 9.1.3 Recommendation of PPG ................................................................................ 9-2 9.1.4 Technical Guideline for Initial Survey ............................................................ 9-3 9.1.5 Procedure Manual for Landslide ..................................................................... 9-4

9.2 Proposal on a Feasibility Study ................................................................. 9-6 9.2.1 Promotion of Fund Raising ............................................................................. 9-6 9.2.2 Organizational Reinforcement Plan .............................................................. 9-10

9.3 Proposal on a Pilot Project (Landslide Countermeasures) ..................... 9-17 9.3.1 Structural Countermeasures (Future Plan) .................................................... 9-17 9.3.2 Development in the Landslide Hazard Zone after the Landslide

Countermeasure Works ............................................................................... 9-22 9.3.3 Early Warning and Evacuation System......................................................... 9-23 9.3.4 Information, Education and Communication (IEC) ...................................... 9-25

9.4 Proposal on a Landslide Management Plan for Other Landslide Areas . 9-27 9.4.1 Hypothesis on Landslides in Mauritius ......................................................... 9-27 9.4.2 Proposal on Formulation of a Landslide Management Plan ......................... 9-28

vi

Supporting Report

Volume 1 1. Minutes of Meeting on the Detailed Planning Survey for the Project

2. Minutes of Meeting on 1st Steering Committee

3. Minutes of Meeting on 2nd Steering Committee

4. Minutes of Meeting on 3rd Steering Committee

5. Minutes of Meeting on 4th Steering Committee

6. Landslide Location Map

7. Landslide Recording Sheet

8. Result of Aerial Photograph Interpretation

9. The Survey Result of Landslide Awareness of Residents

10. Regular Check Sheets and Photo Sheets

11. Bore Logs and Core Sample Photo

12. Soil Test and Water Quality

13. Review and Recommendation for the Disaster Scheme

14. Review and Recommendation for the Planning Policy Guidance

15. Result of Stability Analysis

16. Project Leaflet (Project of Landslide Management in the Republic of Mauritius)

17. Presentation Material for 1st Stakeholder Meeting

18. Presentation Material for 2nd Stakeholder Meeting

19. Minutes of 1st Technical Seminar

20. Minutes of 2nd Technical Seminar

21. Minutes of 1st Advisory Committee in Japan

22. Minutes of 2nd Advisory Committee in Japan

23. Minutes of 3rd Advisory Committee in Japan

24. Minutes of 4th Advisory Committee in Japan

Volume 2 25. Reports of Technical Advice of Individual Site for MPI

26. Soil Water Index

27. Result of Ring Shear Test

28. Calculation of Pile Work

29. Results of Stability Analysis of Slope behind the Drainage

30. Consideration of the Cross Section for Drainage

31. Drawings for the Landslide Countermeasure

32. Documents related to the Modification of Drawings

33. Cost estimation

34. Construction Supervision Report

vii

List of Figures

Page Figure 1.4.1 Location Map of the Project Area ................................................................................. 1-3 Figure 1.5.1 Flowchart of Project Activity ...................................................................................... 1-7 Figure 2.1.1 Full View Map of Mauritius .......................................................................................... 2-1 Figure 2.2.1 Geological Map of Mauritius ........................................................................................ 2-2 Figure 2.2.2 Cross Section of the Typical Landslide (Colluvial Landslide): La Butte Landslide ..... 2-3 Figure 2.2.3 Annual Rainfall Amount in Mauritius (1971~2000) ..................................................... 2-4 Figure 2.3.1 Example of the Result of Aerial Photograph interpretation - Chitrakoot area ............. 2-11 Figure 2.3.2 Schematic Diagram of Landslide Landforms ............................................................ 2-12 Figure 2.3.3 Example of the Landslide Recording Sheet, Chitrakoot Area ................................... 2-14 Figure 2.3.4 Example of the Landslide Recording Sheet, Vallee Pitot Area ................................. 2-15 Figure 2.3.5 Example of the Landslide Recording Sheet, Quatre Soeurs ...................................... 2-16 Figure 2.3.6 Landslide Location Map ............................................................................................ 2-17 Figure 2.3.7 Flow to Create A Database Using the ArcGIS .......................................................... 2-21 Figure 2.3.8 Sample of Link of Political Boundary Map and Attribute Data ................................ 2-23 Figure 2.3.9 Landslide Survey location Map (Base Map: Topographic Map(1:25,000)) ................ 2-24 Figure 2.3.10 Landslide Survey location Map (Base Map: Roads, River, contour line, Province

Boundary) .................................................................................................................. 2-24 Figure 2.3.11 Landslide Distribution Map, Chitrakoot Area ........................................................... 2-24 Figure 2.3.12 Landslide Distribution Map, Quatre Soeurs Area ..................................................... 2-24 Figure 2.4.1 The Landslide Structural Countermeasures in La Butte Area ..................................... 2-26 Figure 2.5.1 Land Use Map ............................................................................................................. 2-28 Figure 2.5.2 Population Distribution Map ....................................................................................... 2-30 Figure 2.5.3 Poverty Distribution Map ............................................................................................ 2-31 Figure 2.5.4 Distribution Map of Principal Water Resources in Mauritius ..................................... 2-32 Figure 3.2.1 Chitrakoot, Plan Map ..................................................................................................... 3-4 Figure 3.2.2 Chitrakoot, Cross Section .............................................................................................. 3-4 Figure 3.2.3 Quatre Soeurs, Plan Map ............................................................................................... 3-5 Figure 3.2.4 Quatre Soeurs, Cross Section ........................................................................................ 3-5 Figure 3.2.5 Vallee Pitot, Plan Map ................................................................................................... 3-6 Figure 3.2.6 Vallee Pitot, Cross Section .......................................................................................... 3-6 Figure 3.3.1 Topographic Map of the Site ......................................................................................... 3-7 Figure 3.3.2 Aerial Photograph of the Site ........................................................................................ 3-7 Figure 3.3.3 Location of the Site on Geological Map ........................................................................ 3-9 Figure 3.3.4 An Explanatory Drawing of Peak Strength and Residual Strength ............................. 3-12 Figure 3.3.5 Typical Particle Size Distribution of Slip Surface Soil for Each Geological Zone in

Japan.......................................................................................................................... 3-13 Figure 3.3.6 Relation of Plasticity Index and Residual Shear Stress Angle for Various

Geological Zones ...................................................................................................... 3-14 Figure 3.3.7 Structure of Cyclic Shear Test Device ......................................................................... 3-16 Figure 3.3.8 Relation between Shear Stress and Accumulative Shear Displacement ...................... 3-16 Figure 3.3.9 Measuring the Friction Force between Two Shear Boxes ........................................... 3-16 Figure 3.3.10 Method of Determining Strength Factor for Design Using C-Tanφ Diagram ........... 3-17 Figure 3.3.11 Structure of Shear-Test Device .................................................................................. 3-17 Figure 3.3.12 Method of Making Test Piece That Includes Slip Surface ........................................ 3-17 Figure 3.3.13 Structure of Triaxial Shear Test Device .................................................................... 3-19 Figure 3.3.14 Atterberg Limits ........................................................................................................ 3-23 Figure 3.3.15 Sampling Location (Chitrakoot) .............................................................................. 3-25 Figure 3.3.16 Sampling Location (Quatre Soeurs) .......................................................................... 3-26 Figure 3.3.17 Sampling Location (Vallee Pitot) .............................................................................. 3-26 Figure 3.3.18 Difference between Direct Shearing Test and Ring Shear Test ................................ 3-27 Figure 3.3.19 Shearing Characteristic of Normally-Consolidated Clay and Overconsolidated

Clay ........................................................................................................................... 3-28 Figure 3.3.20 Structural Drawing of the Ring Shear Apparatus .................................................... 3-28 Figure 3.3.21 Test Specimen Rough Sketch .................................................................................... 3-28

viii

Figure 3.3.22 Examination Process of Ring Shear Test ................................................................... 3-29 Figure 3.3.23 Example of Hexadiagram .......................................................................................... 3-32 Figure 3.3.24 Hexadiagram in the Groundwater at Chitrakoot ........................................................ 3-34 Figure 3.3.25 Hexadiagram in the Groundwater at Quatre Soeurs .................................................. 3-34 Figure 3.4.1 Basic Landslide Monitoring Techniques ..................................................................... 3-36 Figure 3.4.2 Plan of Instrument Installation – Chitrakoot ............................................................... 3-36 Figure 3.4.3 Plan of Instrument Installation – Quatre Soeurs .......................................................... 3-37 Figure 3.4.4 Plan of Instrument Installation – Vallee Pitot .............................................................. 3-37 Figure 3.4.5 Result of Rain Gauge ................................................................................................... 3-38 Figure 3.4.6 Results of Extensometer ............................................................................................ 3-40 Figure 3.4.7 Results of Inclinometer ................................................................................................ 3-40 Figure 3.4.8 Vertical Stress at Head of Landslide ........................................................................... 3-41 Figure 3.4.9 Results of Strain Gauges .............................................................................................. 3-42 Figure 3.4.10 Results of Piezometer ................................................................................................ 3-43 Figure 3.4.11 Result of Rain Gauge ................................................................................................. 3-44 Figure 3.4.12 Result of Laser Distance Meter ................................................................................. 3-45 Figure 3.4.13 Results of Strain Gauges ............................................................................................ 3-46 Figure 3.4.14 Groundwater at BH-Q2 ............................................................................................. 3-46 Figure 3.4.15 Results of Piezometer .............................................................................................. 3-47 Figure 3.4.16 Water Level in The Boreholes ................................................................................... 3-48 Figure 3.4.17 Location of Extensometers ........................................................................................ 3-49 Figure 3.4.18 Results of Extensometer ............................................................................................ 3-49 Figure 3.4.19 Tension Movement at EV2 ........................................................................................ 3-49 Figure 3.5.1 Location of Seismic Survey Lines at Chitrakoot ......................................................... 3-51 Figure 3.5.2 The Seismic Wave ....................................................................................................... 3-52 Figure 3.5.3 Travel Time Curves and Seismic Paths ....................................................................... 3-52 Figure 3.5.4 DAQ LINK ⅡSystem and Measured Image .............................................................. 3-53 Figure 3.5.5 Observation Procedure and Diagram of Observation .................................................. 3-53 Figure 3.5.6 Travel-time Curve of A1-1 Line .................................................................................. 3-55 Figure 3.5.7 Analytical Diagram of Velocity Profile of A1-1 Line ................................................. 3-55 Figure 3.5.8 Seismic Velocity Section (A1-line) ............................................................................. 3-57 Figure 3.5.9 Seismic Velocity Section (A2-line) ............................................................................. 3-57 Figure 3.5.10 Seismic Velocity Section (B1-line) ........................................................................... 3-57 Figure 3.5.11 Seismic Velocity Section (B2A-line) ........................................................................ 3-58 Figure 3.5.12 Seismic Velocity Section (B2B-line) ......................................................................... 3-58 Figure 3.5.13 Seismic Velocity Section (C-line) ............................................................................. 3-58 Figure 3.5.14 Location of Resistivity Survey Lines in Chitrakoot .................................................. 3-60 Figure 3.5.15 Measuring Equipment (SYSCAL R1 PLUS Switch-72) and Pole Bolt .................... 3-61 Figure 3.5.16 Electrode Arrays for 2-Pole Method .......................................................................... 3-61 Figure 3.5.17 High-Density Electrical Resistivity Exploration Measuring Method ........................ 3-62 Figure 3.5.18 Resistivity Inversion Analysis Flow .......................................................................... 3-63 Figure 3.5.19 Resistivity Sequence of A1-1 Line ............................................................................ 3-64 Figure 3.5.20 Resistivity Pseudosection (A1-line) according to Inverse Analysis .......................... 3-65 Figure 3.5.21 Resistivity Pseudosection (A2-line) according to Inverse Analysis .......................... 3-65 Figure 3.5.22 Resistivity Pseudosection (B1-line) according to Inverse Analysis .......................... 3-66 Figure 3.5.23 Resistivity Pseudosection (B2A-line) according to Inverse Analysis ....................... 3-66 Figure 3.5.24 Resistivity Pseudosection (B2B-line) according to Inverse Analysis ........................ 3-67 Figure 3.5.25 Resistivity Pseudosection (C-line) according to Inverse Analysis ............................ 3-67 Figure 3.6.1 Survey Locations in Chitrakoot ................................................................................... 3-69 Figure 3.6.2 Survey locations in Quatre Soeurs ............................................................................... 3-70 Figure 3.7.1 Results of Survey on Damage to Houses, Chitrakoot .................................................. 3-83 Figure 3.7.2 Monitoring Locations of the Damaged Houses ........................................................... 3-85 Figure 3.7.3 Past Newspaper Report ................................................................................................ 3-88 Figure 3.7.4 Results of Survey on Damage to Houses, Vallee Pitot ................................................ 3-88 Figure 3.7.5 Slope classification of the area .................................................................................. 3-104 Figure 3.7.6 Landslide Plan Map, 1st Reconnaissance in 2012 ..................................................... 3-115 Figure 3.7.7 Landslide Plan Map (3rd Reconnaissance on 26th February 2013) .......................... 3-119

ix

Figure 3.8.1 Situation of the Inspection for Slope Disasters .......................................................... 3-121 Figure 3.8.2 Example of Regular Check Sheet .............................................................................. 3-122 Figure 3.8.3 Location Map of Rank As ( ) including Chitrakoot, Vallee Pitot and Quatre

Soeurs .................................................................................................................... 3-126 Figure 3.9.1 Outline Image of the Draft Recommendation for Disaster Scheme .......................... 3-131 Figure 3.10.1 Process for Making Recommendation for PPG ..................................................... 3-150 Figure 3.10.2 Japanese Legal Systems for Landslide Countermeasures ........................................ 3-151 Figure 3.10.3 Conceptual Image of Non-Physical Countermeasure Implementation by the

Landslide Disasters Prevention Act ........................................................................ 3-154 Figure 3.10.4 Summary of the Landslide Disasters Prevention Act .............................................. 3-155 Figure 3.10.5 Acts and Schemes related with PPG ........................................................................ 3-159 Figure 3.10.6 Strategy Plan of Port Louis (Chitrakoot is shown in Black Frame) ........................ 3-160 Figure 3.10.7 Building Distribution in Landslide Risk Area of Chitrakoot ................................... 3-161 Figure 3.10.8 Development Restriction in Quatre Soeurs ............................................................. 3-162 Figure 3.10.9 Strategy Plan of Port Louis (Vallée Pitot is shown in Black Frame) ....................... 3-164 Figure 3.10.10 The Damaged Area and Building Distribution in Vallée Pitot .............................. 3-164 Figure 3.10.11 Outline Image of the Draft Recommendation for PPG .......................................... 3-166 Figure 3.11.1 The Scope of Application of the Technical Guideline for Initial Survey ................ 3-179 Figure 3.12.1 The Scope of Application of the Procedure Manual for Landslides ........................ 3-181 Figure 4.1.1 Landslide Blocks in Chitrakoot ..................................................................................... 4-1 Figure 4.1.2 Geological Section of Block A (North- South) ............................................................. 4-2 Figure 4.1.3 Geological Section of Block B (North- South) .............................................................. 4-3 Figure 4.1.4 Geological Section of Whole Area of Chitrakoot (North- South) ................................. 4-3 Figure 4.1.5 Landslide Blocks in Quatre Soeurs................................................................................ 4-4 Figure 4.1.6 Geological Section of Slopes in Quatre Soeurs ............................................................. 4-5 Figure 4.1.7 Landslide Blocks in Vallee Pitot ................................................................................. 4-6 Figure 4.1.8 Assumed Landslide Slips in Vallee Pitot along Red Line in Figure 4.1.7 ..................... 4-7 Figure 4.2.1 Record of the Extensometers in Block A in Chitrakoot .............................................. 4-8 Figure 4.2.2 Groundwater Levels in Chitrakoot Monitored by Piezometers ..................................... 4-9 Figure 4.2.3 Picture of BPP(13) in March 2013 .............................................................................. 4-10 Figure 4.3.1 Image of SWI Model ................................................................................................... 4-14 Figure 4.3.2 3-Steps of Tank Model ................................................................................................ 4-14 Figure 4.3.3 Example of Daily Rainfall Data Divided into 24 Hours .............................................. 4-16 Figure 4.3.4 Comparison between GSMaP Data and Rain Gauge Data ........................................ 4-17 Figure 4.3.5 The Role of Disaster Record in SWI ........................................................................... 4-18 Figure 4.3.6 SWI and Cumulative Precipitation in Chitrakoot (2005, MMS) ................................. 4-19 Figure 4.3.7 SWI and Cumulative Precipitation in Chitrakoot (2006, MMS) ................................. 4-20 Figure 4.3.8 SWI and Cumulative Precipitation in Chitrakoot (2008, MMS) ................................. 4-20 Figure 4.3.9 SWI and Cumulative Precipitation in Chitrakoot (2005, GSMaP) .............................. 4-21 Figure 4.3.10 SWI and Cumulative Precipitation in Chitrakoot (2006, GSMaP) ............................ 4-21 Figure 4.3.11 SWI and Cumulative Precipitation in Chitrakoot (2008, GSMaP) ............................ 4-21 Figure 4.3.12 SWI and Cumulative Precipitation in Quatre Soeurs (2005, MMS) ......................... 4-24 Figure 4.3.13 SWI and Cumulative Precipitation in Quatre Soeurs (2008, MMS) ......................... 4-24 Figure 4.3.14 SWI and Cumulative Precipitation in Quatre Soeurs (2005, GSMaP) ...................... 4-25 Figure 4.3.15 SWI and Cumulative Precipitation in Quatre Soeurs (2008, GSMaP) ...................... 4-25 Figure 4.4.1 Changes in Groundwater Level Triggering Mass Movement while also Affecting

Values of Safety Factor Over Time ........................................................................... 4-29 Figure 4.4.2 Schematic Diagram of the Modified Fellenius Method ............................................... 4-34 Figure 4.4.3 Location Map of the Landslide Block in Chitrakoot Area .......................................... 4-35 Figure 4.4.4 Longitudinal Section for Stability Analysis, Block A in Chitrakoot ........................... 4-36 Figure 4.4.5 Longitudinal Section for Stability Analysis, Block B in Chitrakoot ........................... 4-36 Figure 4.4.6 C-φ Diagram, Chitrakoot Area .................................................................................... 4-39 Figure 4.4.7 Relationship of the Plastic Index and Shear Resistance Angle, the Sliding Surface

Clay Gathered at the Position of the Source ............................................................. 4-39 Figure 4.4.8 Location Map of the Landslide Block in Quatre Soeurs Area ..................................... 4-40 Figure 4.4.9 Longitudinal section for stability analysis, Block A in Quatre Soeurs ........................ 4-41 Figure 4.4.10 Longitudinal Section for Stability Analysis, Block B in Quatre Soeurs .................... 4-41 Figure 4.4.11 C-φ Diagram, Quatre Soeurs Area ............................................................................ 4-43

x

Figure 4.4.12 Relations of the Plastic Index and Shear Resistance Angle, the Sliding Surface Clay Gathered at the Position of the Source ............................................................. 4-44

Figure 4.4.13 Location Map of the Landslide Block in Vallee Pitot Area ...................................... 4-45 Figure 4.4.14 Longitudinal Section for Stability Analysis, Block A-2 in Vallee Pitot .................... 4-46 Figure 4.4.15 Longitudinal Section for Stability Analysis, Block E in Vallee Pitot ........................ 4-46 Figure 4.4.16 C-φ Diagram, Vallee Pitot Area ................................................................................ 4-47 Figure 4.4.17 C-φ Diagram and the Result of Ring Shear Test in Chitrakoot Block-A .................. 4-49 Figure 4.4.18 C-φ Diagram and the Result of Ring Shear Test in Quatre Soeurs Block-A ............. 4-49 Figure 4.4.19 C-φ Diagram and the Result of Ring Shear Test in Vallee Pitot Block-A2 .............. 4-50 Figure 4.5.1 Result of Damaged House Survey, Chitrakoot Area ................................................... 4-52 Figure 4.5.2 Location of Heavy Damaged House, Quatre Soeurs Area ........................................ 4-53 Figure 4.5.3 Location of Heavy Damaged House, Vallee Pitot Area .............................................. 4-54 Figure 5.2.1 Flow Chart of Selection for Landside Countermeasure Work ....................................... 5-6 Figure 5.2.2 Target Landslide Blocks in Chitrakoot Area ................................................................. 5-7 Figure 5.2.3 Calculation Model for Verification of Effectiveness of the Works -Block A in

Chitrakoot Area ......................................................................................................... 5-14 Figure 5.2.4 Calculation Model for Verification of Effectiveness of the Works in Block B in

Chitrakoot Area ......................................................................................................... 5-15 Figure 5.2.5 Plan of Countermeasure Works in Chitrakoot Area .................................................... 5-16 Figure 5.2.6 Plan of Countermeasure Works in Block A ................................................................ 5-17 Figure 5.2.7 Plan of Countermeasure Works in Block B ................................................................. 5-18 Figure 5.2.8 Location Map with Houses of the Landslides ............................................................. 5-20 Figure 5.2.9 Location Map of the Landslides .................................................................................. 5-20 Figure 5.2.10 Longitudinal Condition of the Canal ......................................................................... 5-21 Figure 5.2.11 Proposed Emergency Works ..................................................................................... 5-22 Figure 5.2.12 Sand Bags as Counterweights as a Landslide Countermeasure ................................. 5-23 Figure 5.3.1 Procedure of EIA Survey ............................................................................................. 5-28 Figure 6.1.1 Typical Cross Section of Channel for Flood Water ....................................................... 6-2 Figure 6.1.2 Location of the Cross Sections for the Analysis ............................................................ 6-3 Figure 6.1.3 Typical Cross Section of Horizontal Drainage .............................................................. 6-4 Figure 6.1.4 Typical Cross Section of Open-blind Ditch ................................................................... 6-4 Figure 6.1.5 Typical Cross Section of Surface Drainage ................................................................... 6-5 Figure 6.1.6 Typical Cross Section of Upgrade of Existing Water Course ....................................... 6-6 Figure 6.1.7 Typical Cross section of Protection of the Existing Water Course ............................... 6-6 Figure 6.1.8 Location of the Existing Water Course that Often Overflows ....................................... 6-7 Figure 6.1.9 Typical Drawing of the Drop Structure ......................................................................... 6-7 Figure 6.1.10 Typical Cross Section of the Bridge ............................................................................ 6-8 Figure 6.1.11 Typical Drawings of Water Catch Basin ................................................................... 6-8 Figure 6.1.12 Location Map of Planned Countermeasure Works in Block A ................................. 6-10 Figure 6.1.13 Water Catchment Area for Each Drainage ................................................................ 6-13 Figure 6.1.14 Work Section in Block-A Landslide.......................................................................... 6-21 Figure 6.1.15 Work Schedule of Work Section I ............................................................................. 6-22 Figure 6.1.16 Schedule of the Bidding ............................................................................................ 6-25 Figure 6.1.17 Flow Chart for Future Plan of Landslide Countermeasure Works in Chitrakoot

Area ........................................................................................................................... 6-30 Figure 6.1.18 Location of Monitoring Borehole for Block-A Landslide ......................................... 6-32 Figure 6.1.19 Location of Monitoring Borehole for Block-B Landslide ......................................... 6-33 Figure 6.2.1 Circulation of the Information ..................................................................................... 6-38 Figure 6.2.2 Displacements shown in Extensometer Results in Chitrakoot .................................... 6-41 Figure 6.2.3 Relation between Rain fall and the Groundwater Level .............................................. 6-41 Figure 6.2.4 Extensometer Monitoring Results in Chitrakoot and Vallee Pitot ............................... 6-42 Figure 6.2.5 Extensometer Monitoring Results in Chitrakoot and Vallee Pitot ............................... 6-42 Figure 6.2.6 Extensometer ............................................................................................................... 6-43 Figure 6.2.7 Relation between Time to the Extent of Slope Failure and Velocity of Steady

Strain ......................................................................................................................... 6-44 Figure 6.2.8 Location Map of Early Warning and Evacuation System in Chitrakoot ..................... 6-48 Figure 6.2.9 Location Map of Early Warning and Evacuation System in Vallee Pitot ................... 6-49 Figure.6.2.10 Conception Diagram of Early Warning and Evacuation System ............................... 6-49

xi

Figure 6.2.11 The Parts of the Early Warning and Evacuation System ........................................... 6-50 Figure.6.2.12 Structure of Siren, Rotary Light ................................................................................ 6-51 Figure 6.2.13 Structure of Warning Control Box ............................................................................ 6-51 Figure 6.2.14 Structure of Solar Panel ............................................................................................. 6-51 Figure 6.2.15 Installation of the Early Warning and Evacuation System in Chitrakoot .................. 6-52 Figure 6.2.16 Installation of the Early Warning and Evacuation System in Vallee Pitot .............. 6-52 Figure 7.2.1 Structure of Technical Transfer ..................................................................................... 7-3 Figure 8.1.1 JICA Environment, Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Management

Program and Related Mauritius Agencies ................................................................... 8-2 Figure 8.3.1 Major Components of IOC Program ............................................................................. 8-6 Figure 8.4.1 Relationship between CCD and Related International Organizations/Ministries .......... 8-9 Figure 8.4.2 JICA Climate Change Adaptation/Disaster Management Projects and the Relation

with Other International Development Partners, and the Related Policies of Mauritius ................................................................................................................... 8-11

Figure 8.5.1 An Image of Cooperation on Climate Change and Disaster Risk Management among JICA, International Organizations, Mauritius and the Southwest Indian Ocean Islands ............................................................................................................ 8-17

Figure 9.1.1 Outline Image of the Draft Recommendation for Disaster Scheme .............................. 9-1 Figure 9.1.2 Outline Image of the Draft Recommendation for PPG .................................................. 9-2 Figure 9.1.3 The Scope of Application of the Technical Guideline for Initial Survey ...................... 9-3 Figure 9.1.4 The Scope of Application of the Procedure Manual for Landslides .............................. 9-4 Figure 9.3.1 Flow Chart for Future Plan of Landslide Countermeasure Works in Chitrakoot

Area ........................................................................................................................... 9-17 Figure 9.3.2 Location of Monitoring Borehole for Block-A Landslide ........................................... 9-20 Figure 9.3.3 Location of Monitoring Borehole for Block-B Landslide ........................................... 9-21

xii

List of Tables

Page

Table 1.2.1 Overview of Landslide Damage and Countermeasures in Mauritius ............................. 1-1 Table 1.4.1 List of JICA Expert Team and Counterparts .................................................................. 1-4 Table 2.3.1 32 Landslide Hazard Areas Selected in the Disasters Scheme ....................................... 2-5 Table 2.3.2 Revised 37 Landslide Hazard Areas ............................................................................... 2-6 Table 2.3.3 Classification of Hazard Area ......................................................................................... 2-7 Table 2.3.4 Description of the Disaster Type .................................................................................... 2-8 Table 2.3.5 Legends of Aerial Photograph Interpretation ................................................................ 2-10 Table 2.3.6 List of Aerial Photographs ............................................................................................ 2-10 Table 2.3.7 Summary of the Aerial Photograph Interpretation ........................................................ 2-11 Table 2.3.8 The Disaster Focus Points for Landslide Hazard Evaluation ........................................ 2-12 Table 2.3.9 Description of Scoring Sheet for Evaluating Landslide Hazard ................................... 2-13 Table 2.3.10 Result of Landslide Hazard Evaluation ...................................................................... 2-13 Table 2.3.11 Landslide Inventory .................................................................................................... 2-18 Table 2.3.12 Existing GIS Data Collected in Mauritius .................................................................. 2-22 Table 2.3.13 New GIS Data Obtained from Field Surveys, etc. ...................................................... 2-22 Table 2.4.1 Survey on Structural/Non-structural Measures ............................................................. 2-25 Table 2.4.2 The Structural Countermeasures of Landslide Hazard Area (6 Areas) ......................... 2-25 Table 2.4.3 Current Condition of Landslide Monitoring in Mauritius ............................................. 2-27 Table 2.5.1 Land Use Changes as Per Category in Mauritius During the Period 1986 to 2010 ...... 2-29 Table 2.5.2 Water Utilization ........................................................................................................... 2-33 Table 2.5.3 Summary of Attitude Survey about Landslide Disasters .............................................. 2-34 Table 2.5.4 Items and Content of the Survey Sheet ......................................................................... 2-35 Table 2.5.5 Summary of Simple Tabulation Results of All Respondents ........................................ 2-36 Table 2.5.6 Comparison of Awareness in the Three Pilot Sites ....................................................... 2-37 Table 2.6.1 Main Authorities of Disaster Management ................................................................... 2-39 Table 2.6.2 Main Ministries and Organizations in Charge of Landslide Disaster Management ... 2-41 Table 2.6.3 Main Ministries and Organizations in Charge of Landslide Disaster Management

for Ordinary and Emergency Situations .................................................................... 2-42 Table 2.7.1 GDP, GDP Per Capita and GDP Growth ...................................................................... 2-43 Table 2.7.2 Budget for the MPI ....................................................................................................... 2-48 Table 2.7.3 Budget for the LMU from 2015 to 2017 ....................................................................... 2-49 Table 3.1.1 Results of Landslide Hazard Area Selection ................................................................... 3-2 Table 3.2.1 Table of Quantities of Survey Areas ............................................................................... 3-3 Table 3.3.1 Outline of Stratum .......................................................................................................... 3-9 Table 3.3.2 Features of Stratum ....................................................................................................... 3-11 Table 3.3.3 Application for Soil Strength and Mechanical Property Test ....................................... 3-12 Table 3.3.4 Selection of Test Method for Type of Sample and Characteristics of Strength

Obtained by Test ....................................................................................................... 3-15 Table 3.3.5 Previous Survey Report ................................................................................................ 3-19 Table 3.3.6 List of Laboratory Soil Tests Conducted ...................................................................... 3-19 Table 3.3.7 Results of Physical Test ................................................................................................ 3-20 Table 3.3.8 Results of Physical Test ................................................................................................ 3-20 Table 3.3.9 Results of Shear Box Test ............................................................................................. 3-21 Table 3.3.10 Results of Triaxial Compression ................................................................................. 3-21 Table 3.3.11 Results of Physical Test .............................................................................................. 3-21 Table 3.3.12 Results of Physical Test .............................................................................................. 3-22 Table 3.3.13 Results of Triaxial Compression ................................................................................. 3-22 Table 3.3.14 List of Laboratory Soil Tests ...................................................................................... 3-22 Table 3.3.15 Results of Physical Test(1) ......................................................................................... 3-23 Table 3.3.16 Results of Physical Test(2) ......................................................................................... 3-23 Table 3.3.17 Results of Physical Test (1) ........................................................................................ 3-24 Table 3.3.18 Results of Physical Test (2) ...................................................................................... 3-24 Table 3.3.19 Ring Shear Test Result................................................................................................ 3-30

xiii

Table 3.3.20 Status of Sampling for Water Quality Testing ............................................................ 3-31 Table 3.3.21 Water Quality Test Method ........................................................................................ 3-31 Table 3.4.1 Instruments for the Landslide Monitoring .................................................................... 3-35 Table 3.4.2 Monthly and Maximum Daily Precipitation and Maximum Hourly Precipitation ....... 3-38 Table 3.4.3 Monthly Precipitation, The Maximum Daily Precipitation and The Maximum

Hourly Precipitation .................................................................................................. 3-44 Table 3.5.1 Specifications of the Seismic Exploration .................................................................... 3-50 Table 3.5.2 Extent & Specifications of the Seismic Exploration ..................................................... 3-50 Table 3.5.3 List of Equipment to be Used ....................................................................................... 3-52 Table 3.5.4 Comparison between Peel Off and Tomographic Methods .......................................... 3-54 Table 3.5.5 Summary Table of the Various Strata Identified .......................................................... 3-56 Table 3.5.6 Specifications of Two-dimensional Resistivity Exploration ......................................... 3-59 Table 3.5.7 Extent & Specifications of the Resistivity Exploration ................................................ 3-59 Table 3.5.8 Summary Table of the Various Strata Identified .......................................................... 3-64 Table 3.6.1 Field Drilling Schedule (Chitrakoot) ............................................................................ 3-68 Table 3.6.2 Field Drilling Schedule (Quatre Soeurs) ....................................................................... 3-68 Table 3.6.3 Borehole Details ........................................................................................................... 3-69 Table 3.6.4 Borehole Details ........................................................................................................... 3-70 Table 3.6.5 Specifications of the Drilling Machines and Materials ................................................. 3-70 Table 3.6.6 Rock Mass Weathering ................................................................................................. 3-72 Table 3.6.7 Quality Classification of Rocks by RQD Values .......................................................... 3-72 Table 3.6.8 Strength Description of Rock Material ......................................................................... 3-72 Table 3.6.9 Classification of Discontinuity Spacing ........................................................................ 3-73 Table 3.6.10 Specifications of the Pipe Strain Gauge .................................................................... 3-74 Table 3.6.11 Specifications of the Special Casing Pipe (Guide Pipe) ............................................. 3-75 Table 3.6.12 Specifications of the Piezometer ............................................................................... 3-77 Table 3.6.13 Standard Penetration Test ........................................................................................... 3-78 Table 3.6.14 Relationship between Strata Classification and Geological Features ......................... 3-78 Table 3.6.15 Standard Penetration Test ........................................................................................... 3-79 Table 3.6.16 Relationship between Strata Classification and Geological Features ......................... 3-79 Table 3.6.17 Soil Strength Description ............................................................................................ 3-79 Table 3.6.18 Standard Penetration Test ........................................................................................... 3-80 Table 3.6.19 Standard Penetration Test ........................................................................................... 3-81 Table 3.7.1 Differentiation of House Deformations and Causes of Damage ................................... 3-84 Table 3.7.2 Monitoring of Damaged Houses ................................................................................... 3-85 Table 3.7.3 Areas with Extensive Damage and Its Characteristics .................................................. 3-89 Table 3.7.4 The Characteristics of Slope Classification ................................................................ 3-104 Table 3.8.1 The 37 Slope Disaster Hazard Areas in the Disasters Scheme ................................... 3-120 Table 3.8.2 The Results of Disaster Inspection for 37 Slope Disaster Areas ................................. 3-123 Table 3.9.1 The Warning Stages, Standards for Issuing Warnings and Responses ....................... 3-128 Table 3.9.2 Existing Situation, Issues and Basic Policy for Countermeasure regarding the

Warning/Evacuation System in the Disaster Scheme ........................................... 3-132 Table 3.9.3 Existing Disaster Scheme Article, Draft Proposal of Addition/Modification, Reason

of Addition/Modification and Necessity ................................................................. 3-133 Table 3.9.4 Record of the Meeting/Workshop regarding the Recommendation .......................... 3-147 Table 3.9.5 Points to Remember for the Recommendations .......................................................... 3-148 Table 3.10.1 Summary of the Landslide Disasters Prevention Act ............................................... 3-155 Table 3.10.2 Related Acts regarding Landslide Disaster Prevention ............................................. 3-156 Table 3.10.3 The Existing Mauritian Legal Systems/Schemes for LDRM .................................. 3-157 Table 3.10.4 Interview Survey Results relating to Development Restrictions in Chitrakoot ...... 3-160 Table 3.10.5 Interview Survey Result about the Development Restrictions in Quatre Soeurs .... 3-163 Table 3.10.6 Existing PPG Article, Draft Proposal of Addition/Modification, Reason of

Addition/Modification and Necessity ..................................................................... 3-168 Table 3.10.7 Supplementary Recommendation for Flexible Review of Permitted Area of

Development ........................................................................................................... 3-173 Table 3.10.8 Supplementary Recommendation for the Education/Dissemination and Capacity

Development ........................................................................................................... 3-174 Table 3.10.9 Record of the Meeting/Workshop regarding the Recommendation .......................... 3-175

xiv

Table 3.10.10 Points to Remember for the Recommendations ...................................................... 3-177 Table 3.11.1 The Contents of the Technical Guideline for Initial Survey ..................................... 3-180 Table 3.12.1 The Contents of the Procedure Manual for Landslides ............................................. 3-182 Table 4.3.1 Parameters of Tank Model ............................................................................................ 4-15 Table 4.3.2 Summary of GSMaP Data ............................................................................................ 4-17 Table 4.3.3 Sediment Disaster Record at Chitrakoot ....................................................................... 4-19 Table 4.3.4 SWI and MMS Cumulative Precipitation for Rainfall Event ①~⑫ ........................... 4-20 Table 4.3.5 SWI and GSMaP Cumulative Precipitation for Rainfall Event ⑬~⑳ ........................ 4-22 Table 4.3.6 Sediment Disaster Record at Quatre Souers ................................................................. 4-23 Table 4.3.7 SWI and MMS Cumulative Precipitation for Rainfall Event ㉑~㉚ ........................... 4-24 Table 4.3.8 SWI and GSMaP Cumulative Precipitation for Rainfall Event ㉛~㉟ ........................ 4-25 Table 4.3.9 SWI with Landslide Risk at Chitrakoot and Quatre Soeurs .......................................... 4-26 Table 4.4.1 Definition of Safety Factor for Landslide ..................................................................... 4-29 Table 4.4.2 Landslide Slope Stability Methods and Selected Factors ............................................. 4-31 Table 4.4.3 Definition of Safety Factor for Landslide ..................................................................... 4-33 Table 4.4.4 Current Factor of Safety of the Landslide, Chitrakoot Area ......................................... 4-37 Table 4.4.5 Result of the Laboratory Soil Test, Chitrakoot area ..................................................... 4-37 Table 4.4.6 Existing Result of the Laboratory Soil Test, La Butte Landslide ................................. 4-37 Table 4.4.7 Result of the Stability Analysis, Chitrakoot Area ......................................................... 4-39 Table 4.4.8 Current Factor of Safety of the Landslide, Quatre Soeurs Area ................................... 4-41 Table 4.4.9 Result of the Laboratory Soil Test, Quatre Soeurs Area ............................................... 4-42 Table 4.4.10 Result of the Stability Analysis, Quatre Soeurs Area ................................................. 4-43 Table 4.4.11 Current Factor of Safety of the Landslide, Vallee Pitot Area ..................................... 4-46 Table 4.4.12 Result of the Stability Analysis, Vallee Pitot Area ..................................................... 4-47 Table 4.4.13 Results of Ring Shear Test, Cohesion C and Shear Resistance Angle φ .................... 4-48 Table 4.5.1 Susceptibility Assessment Items ................................................................................... 4-51 Table 4.5.2 Results of Susceptibility Assessment in Chitrakoot Area ............................................. 4-51 Table 4.5.3 Results of Susceptibility Assessment in Quatre Soeurs Area ....................................... 4-52 Table 4.5.4 Results of Susceptibility Assessment in Vallee Pitot Area ........................................... 4-54 Table 5.1.1 Items Considered for Selection of Pilot Project Site ....................................................... 5-1 Table 5.2.1 Selection of Target Landslide Block in Chitrakoot Area ................................................ 5-8 Table 5.2.2 Selection of Control Work for Chitrakoot Area .............................................................. 5-9 Table 5.2.3 Comparative Chart of Control Work Selection in Chitrakoot Area .............................. 5-12 Table 5.2.4 Result of Consideration of Effectiveness of Countermeasure Works ........................... 5-16 Table 5.2.5 Proposed Schedule for the Countermeasures ................................................................ 5-22 Table 5.2.6 Background and Progress of the Relocation of the Inhabitants of Quatre Soeurs ...... 5-24 Table 5.3.1 Undertaking Requiring PER and EIA ........................................................................... 5-26 Table 5.3.2 Expected Environmental and Social Consideration and Impact Items and

Mitigation Measures .................................................................................................. 5-29 Table 5.4.1 General Sheet of the Pilot Project ............................................................................... 5-30 Table 5.4.2 Check Sheet of Pre Evaluation in the Pilot Project ....................................................... 5-31 Table 5.4.3 Check Sheet of Interim Review in the Pilot Project ..................................................... 5-33 Table 5.4.4 Check Sheet of Post Evaluation in the Pilot Project ..................................................... 5-34 Table 5.5.1 Breakdown of Budget in 2013 ...................................................................................... 5-36 Table 5.5.2 List of Countermeasures and Budgets in 2014-2016 .................................................... 5-37 Table 5.5.3 List of Countermeasures and Budgets in 2015-2017 .................................................... 5-38 Table 5.6.1 Organizational Structure of MPI and Civil Engineering Section .................................. 5-42 Table 5.6.2 Organizational Structure of MPI and Civil Engineering Section .................................. 5-42 Table 5.6.3 Issues, Goals and Activities in Capacity Development Plan ........................................ 5-44 Table 5.6.4 Full-time Staff Assignment (Long Term Goal) ............................................................ 5-48 Table 5.6.5 Budget for the LMU from 2015 to 2017 ....................................................................... 5-48 Table 5.6.6 Main Responsible Organizations based on Disaster Classification, Objects of

Protection and the Scale of Protection ...................................................................... 5-50 Table 5.6.7 Task Flow for Emergency Situation for All Sites ......................................................... 5-52 Table 5.6.8 Emergency Operational System within the LMU ......................................................... 5-53 Table 6.1.1 Classification of Landslide Countermeasure Works ....................................................... 6-1 Table 6.1.2 Condition of Stability Analysis of Slope behind the Channel for Flood Water .............. 6-3

xv

Table 6.1.3 Result of the Stability Analysis of the Slope behind the Channel .................................. 6-3 Table 6.1.4 Countermeasure Works (Control Work) for the Block-A Landslide .............................. 6-9 Table 6.1.5 Runoff Coefficient based on Ground Surface Condition, ............................................. 6-11 Table 6.1.6 Intensity of Rainfall ...................................................................................................... 6-12 Table 6.1.7 Water Catchment Area for Each Drainage ................................................................... 6-12 Table 6.1.8 Condition and Result of the Calculation of Runoff Volume ......................................... 6-13 Table 6.1.9 Manning's Roughness Coefficient, ................................................................................ 6-14 Table 6.1.10 Condition and Result of Calculation of Discharge Volume of Each Horizontal

Drainage Pipe ............................................................................................................ 6-15 Table 6.1.11 Design Discharge Volume of Each Horizontal Drainage Work ................................. 6-15 Table 6.1.12 Condition and Result of the Calculation for the Discharge Capacity of Each

Designed Drainage .................................................................................................... 6-16 Table 6.1.13 Evaluation Result of the Availability of Designed Drainages .................................... 6-16 Table 6.1.14 Plan of Access Road for the Construction Work ........................................................ 6-17 Table 6.1.15 Quantity Survey Result for Countermeasure Works for Block-A Landslide in

Chitrakoot Area ......................................................................................................... 6-18 Table 6.1.16 Quantity and Cost Estimation of Countermeasure Works in Chitrakoot Area ........... 6-19 Table 6.1.17 Major Machinery and Materials for the Works ........................................................... 6-22 Table 6.1.18 Outline of the Landslide Countermeasure Works ....................................................... 6-23 Table 6.1.19 Long List of Local Contractors ................................................................................... 6-24 Table 6.1.20 List of Local Contractors Participated in the Site Explanation ................................... 6-26 Table 6.1.21 List of Local Contractor Participants in the Opening of Bid ...................................... 6-26 Table 6.1.22 Result of Bidding Price and Selected Bidder .............................................................. 6-28 Table 6.1.23 List of Changed Design Part ....................................................................................... 6-29 Table 6.1.24 Planned Landslide Countermeasure Works in Chitrakoot Area ................................. 6-31 Table 6.1.25 Reference Value of the Groundwater Level to Achieve the Planned Factor of

Safety ........................................................................................................................ 6-32 Table 6.1.26 Reference Value of the Groundwater Level to Achieve the Planned Factor of

Safety ........................................................................................................................ 6-33 Table 6.1.27 Available Countermeasure Work in Mauritius ........................................................... 6-34 Table 6.1.28 Advisability of the Development Activities in the Landslide Hazard Zone ............... 6-35 Table 6.2.1 Five Stages in Landslide Emergency Scheme ............................................................ 6-37 Table 6.2.2 Proposed Early Warning of Landslide Disaster .......................................................... 6-39 Table 6.2.3 Proposed Thresholds ................................................................................................... 6-44 Table 6.2.4 Estimation of Velocity of Displacement in Accordance with Time to the Extent of

Failure ..................................................................................................................... 6-45 Table 6.2.5 Proposed Threshold .................................................................................................... 6-45 Table 6.2.6 Proposed Early Warning of Landslide Disaster in Chitrakoot, Vallee Pitot and

Quatre Soeurs ............................................................................................................ 6-47 Table 6.2.7 Specifications of the Alarm Operation .......................................................................... 6-48 Table 6.2.8 Quantity of Parts ........................................................................................................... 6-50 Table 6.3.1 IEC Category ................................................................................................................ 6-53 Table 6.3.2 Current Status and Issues of IEC Activity in the Field of Landslide Management in

Mauritius / IEC Activities to be Implemented to Address Issues Identified ............. 6-54 Table 6.3.3 IEC Activities Described in Mauritius Landslide Emergency Scheme (2012-2013).... 6-55 Table 6.3.4 IEC Activities to be Implemented by the Project.......................................................... 6-56 Table 6.3.5 Implementation Plan of Stakeholder Meeting .............................................................. 6-58 Table 6.3.6 Reports of Results of Stakeholder Meetings at Priority Areas...................................... 6-60 Table 7.1.1 Objectives and Inputs on Technical Transfer ................................................................. 7-1 Table 7.1.2 Each Development Stage of the CD ............................................................................... 7-2 Table 7.2.1 The JICA Expert Team Members by Group of Expertise ............................................... 7-3 Table 7.4.1 Summary of Landslide Workshop .................................................................................. 7-7 Table 7.4.2 Outline of “Fundamentals and Basics on Landslides” .................................................... 7-7 Table 7.4.3 Outline of “Landslide Reconnaissance” ......................................................................... 7-8 Table 7.4.4 Outline of “Monitoring Device” ..................................................................................... 7-9 Table 7.4.5 Outline of “Land Use Policy for Landslide Disaster” ..................................................... 7-9 Table 7.4.6 Outline of “Interpretation of Aerial Photo for Landslide” ............................................ 7-10 Table 7.4.7 Outline of “Landslide Investigation/Analysis/Monitoring” .......................................... 7-11

xvi

Table 7.4.8 Outline of “Geotechnical Site Characterization and Constant Volume Direct Shear Test” .......................................................................................................................... 7-11

Table 7.4.9 Outline of “Training of the Landslide Monitoring” ...................................................... 7-12 Table 7.4.10 Outline of “Monitoring Result and Early Warning” ................................................... 7-13 Table 7.4.11 Outline of “Review of Planning Policy Guidance” ..................................................... 7-13 Table 7.4.12 Outline of “Stability Analysis and Countermeasures” ................................................ 7-14 Table 7.4.13 Outline of “Monitoring Log for Pilot Site” ................................................................. 7-14 Table 7.4.14 Outline of “Countermeasure Works 1” ....................................................................... 7-15 Table 7.5.1 Contents of Training in Japan ....................................................................................... 7-16 Table 7.5.2 Schedule of the 1st Training in Japan in 2012 ............................................................... 7-17 Table 7.5.3 Schedule of the 2nd Training in Japan in 2013 .............................................................. 7-18 Table 7.6.1 Plan of SC ..................................................................................................................... 7-21 Table 7.6.2 The Contents of the 1st SC ............................................................................................ 7-21 Table 7.6.3 The Contents of the 2nd SC ........................................................................................... 7-22 Table 7.6.4 The Contents of the 3rd SC ............................................................................................ 7-23 Table 7.6.5 The Contents of the 4th SC ............................................................................................ 7-24 Table 7.7.1 Schedule of Contents to Deliberate in the Advisory Committee .................................. 7-26 Table 7.7.2 Contents of 1st Advisory Committee in Japan .............................................................. 7-26 Table 7.7.3 Contents of 2nd Advisory Committee in Japan .............................................................. 7-27 Table 7.7.4 Contents of 3rd Advisory Committee in Japan .............................................................. 7-27 Table 7.7.5 Contents of 4th Advisory Committee in Japan .............................................................. 7-28 Table 7.8.1 Technical Contents to be Transferred to C/P ................................................................ 7-29 Table 7.8.2 Contents of the Project in 2012-2015 ........................................................................... 7-30 Table 7.8.3 Classification of Hazard Areas on the Disaster Scheme ............................................... 7-31 Table 7.9.1 Main Responsible Organizations based on Disaster Classification, Objects of

Protection and the Scale of Protection ...................................................................... 7-35 Table 7.9.2 Task Flow for Emergency Situation for All Sites ......................................................... 7-36 Table 7.9.3 Emergency Operational System within the LMU ......................................................... 7-37 Table 8.3.1 Relevant Programs of Major Development Partners ...................................................... 8-6 Table 8.3.2 Contents of DRR ............................................................................................................. 8-7 Table 8.5.1 Presentation Details ...................................................................................................... 8-14 Table 8.5.2 Discussion Details ......................................................................................................... 8-15 Table 8.5.3 Participant List for the Day 1 ...................................................................................... 8-17 Table 9.1.1 The Contents of the Technical Guideline for Initial Survey ........................................... 9-4 Table 9.1.2 The Contents of the Procedure Manual for Landslides ................................................... 9-5 Table 9.2.1 Breakdown of Budget in 2013 ........................................................................................ 9-6 Table 9.2.2 List of Countermeasures and Budgets in 2014-2016 ...................................................... 9-7 Table 9.2.3 List of Countermeasures and Budgets in 2015-2017 ...................................................... 9-8 Table 9.2.4 Full-time Staff Assignment (Long Term Goal) ............................................................ 9-11 Table 9.2.5 Main Responsible Organizations based on Disaster Classification, Objects of

Protection and the Scale of Protection ...................................................................... 9-12 Table 9.2.6 Task Flow for Emergency Situation for All Sites ......................................................... 9-14 Table 9.2.7 Emergency Operational System within the LMU ......................................................... 9-15 Table 9.3.1 Planned Landslide Countermeasure Works in Chitrakoot Area ................................... 9-18 Table 9.3.2 Reference Value of the Groundwater Level to Achieve the Planned Factor of

Safety ........................................................................................................................ 9-19 Table 9.3.3 Reference Value of the Groundwater Level to Achieve the Planned Factor of

Safety ........................................................................................................................ 9-21 Table 9.3.4 Advisability of the Development Activities in the Landslide Hazard Zone ................. 9-23 Table 9.3.5 Proposed Early Warning of Landslide Disaster ............................................................ 9-24 Table 9.4.1 Classification of Hazard Areas ..................................................................................... 9-27 Table 9.4.2 Hazard Evaluation Results of the 6 Landslides ............................................................ 9-27

xvii

List of Photos

Page:

Photo 2.3.1 Aerial Photograph Interpretation .................................................................................... 2-9 Photo 3.3.1 Full View of Landslide Area .......................................................................................... 3-7 Photo 3.3.2 Scarp in Landslide Area.................................................................................................. 3-8 Photo 3.3.3 Active Area of Landslide ................................................................................................ 3-8 Photo 3.3.4 Full View of Landslide Area ........................................................................................ 3-10 Photo 3.3.5 Road at the Toe of The Landslide ................................................................................. 3-10 Photo 3.3.6 Sampling Situation ....................................................................................................... 3-27 Photo 3.3.7 Samples ......................................................................................................................... 3-27 Photo 3.6.1 The Drilling Machines and Materials ........................................................................... 3-71 Photo 3.6.2 Installation of the Pipe Strain Gauge ............................................................................ 3-74 Photo 3.6.3 Installation of the Casing Pipe (Guide Pipe) ................................................................ 3-76 Photo 3.6.4 Installation of Water Level Meter ................................................................................. 3-77 Photo 3.7.1 Cracks in House 1 ......................................................................................................... 3-86 Photo 3.7.2 Cracks in House 2 ......................................................................................................... 3-86 Photo 3.7.3 Cracks in Houses 3,4,5 ................................................................................................. 3-87 Photo 3.7.4 Cracks in House19 ........................................................................................................ 3-87 Photo 3.7.5 Steps to the School Building Foundation (East Side) ................................................... 3-90 Photo 3.7.6 Floor of the School Building Foundation (West Side) ................................................. 3-90 Photo 3.7.7 Major Damage to the Steps ........................................................................................... 3-90 Photo 3.7.8 Intermittent Cracks (East-West) ................................................................................... 3-90 Photo 3.7.9 Vertical Displacement beside Extensometer(5) ............................................................ 3-91 Photo 3.7.10 Direction of Vertical Displacement (East-West) ........................................................ 3-91 Photo 3.7.11 Damage to the Retaining Wall (Roadside) ................................................................. 3-91 Photo 3.7.12 Settling of the Roadside Ditch .................................................................................... 3-91 Photo 3.7.13 Lavatory beside School (House No.9) ........................................................................ 3-91 Photo 3.7.14 An Elementary School in Chitrakoot (House No.18) ................................................. 3-92 Photo 3.7.15 Cracks in the School Wall .......................................................................................... 3-92 Photo 3.7.16 Cracks in the Base of the Wall ................................................................................... 3-92 Photo 3.7.17 Cracks in the corner of the School Building ............................................................... 3-92 Photo 3.7.18 The Wall and Sidewalk facing Main Road ................................................................. 3-92 Photo 3.7.19 Heavily Damaged House ............................................................................................ 3-93 Photo 3.7.20 Heavily Damaged House ............................................................................................ 3-93 Photo 3.7.21 Gaps and Unevenness in the Curb .............................................................................. 3-93 Photo 3.7.22 Cracks in the Retaining Wall of the House in front of the School .............................. 3-93 Photo 3.7.23 Cracks in the Retaining Wall beside House ................................................................ 3-94 Photo 3.7.24 Cracks in the Veranda ................................................................................................. 3-94 Photo 3.7.25 Deformation of the House in front of the School ....................................................... 3-94 Photo 3.7.26 Deformation of the Concrete Foundation of Suspected House Remains .................... 3-95 Photo 3.7.27 Cracks in the Concrete Structure ................................................................................ 3-95 Photo 3.7.28 Cracks in the Floor ..................................................................................................... 3-95 Photo 3.7.29 Settling in the Middle of House .................................................................................. 3-96 Photo 3.7.30 Cracks in the Wall (Window Frame) .......................................................................... 3-96 Photo 3.7.31 Inclination of the House (Left: Settling) ..................................................................... 3-96 Photo 3.7.32 Penetrating Cracks in the Wall ................................................................................... 3-96 Photo 3.7.33 Road that Leads Down to Houses (Extensometer is Installed up ahead) .................... 3-96 Photo 3.7.34 Extensometer E(1) (Shot from below) ........................................................................ 3-97 Photo 3.7.35 Deformation of the Protection Fence Foundation Concrete ....................................... 3-97 Photo 3.7.36 Cracks in the House Wall ........................................................................................... 3-97 Photo 3.7.37 Horizontal Open Cracks ............................................................................................. 3-97 Photo 3.7.38 Extensometer E(2) (Shot from below) ...................................................................... 3-98 Photo 3.7.39 Deformation of the Protection Fence foundation ........................................................ 3-98 Photo 3.7.40 Surrounding Slopes of Extensometer E(2) ................................................................. 3-98 Photo 3.7.41 Surrounding slopes of Extensometer E(2) .................................................................. 3-99

xviii

Photo 3.7.42 Farmland between Extensometer E(1) and Stream ..................................................... 3-99 Photo 3.7.43 Advancement of Bank Erosion (Downstream) ........................................................... 3-99 Photo 3.7.44 Advancement of Bank Erosion (Upstream) .............................................................. 3-100 Photo 3.7.45 Heavily Damaged House .......................................................................................... 3-100 Photo 3.7.46 Open Cracks in the House and Retaining Wall ........................................................ 3-100 Photo 3.7.47 Cracks in the Road .................................................................................................... 3-101 Photo 3.7.48 Road in front of House ............................................................................................. 3-101 Photo 3.7.49 Sugarcane Field in front of House ............................................................................ 3-101 Photo 3.7.50 Sugarcane Field (Shot from below) .......................................................................... 3-101 Photo 3.7.51 House No.40 ............................................................................................................. 3-102 Photo 3.7.52 Penetrating Cracks in the Wall ................................................................................. 3-102 Photo 3.7.53 House No.41 ............................................................................................................. 3-103 Photo 3.7.54 Cavity in the Concrete Foundation ........................................................................... 3-103 Photo 3.7.55 Cracks in the Wall .................................................................................................... 3-103 Photo 3.7.56 Cracks in the Wall (Entrance) ................................................................................... 3-103 Photo 3.7.57 Full View of the Site ................................................................................................. 3-104 Photo 3.7.58 Upper Slope (Shot from below, Gradient:16～20°) ................................................. 3-105 Photo 3.7.59 Middle Slope (Shot from below, Gradient:5°) .......................................................... 3-105 Photo 3.7.60 Lower Slope (Shot from below, Gradient:15～17°) ................................................. 3-105 Photo 3.7.61 Full View of the Upper Slope ................................................................................... 3-106 Photo 3.7.62 Vicinity of the Slope (Elevation: about 50m) ........................................................... 3-106 Photo 3.7.63 Vicinity of the Slope (Elevation: about 70m) ........................................................... 3-106 Photo 3.7.64 Outcrop (Elevation: about 80m) ............................................................................... 3-106 Photo 3.7.65 Past Deformations on Upper Slope (From Past Report) ........................................... 3-107 Photo 3.7.66 Deformations around Borehole BH-1 (Current Condition) ...................................... 3-107 Photo 3.7.67 Deformations around Elevation 45m (Current Condition) ....................................... 3-107 Photo 3.7.68 Cracks in the Farm Road .......................................................................................... 3-107 Photo 3.7.69 Cracks in the Farm Road .......................................................................................... 3-107 Photo 3.7.70 Cracks along the Farm Road ..................................................................................... 3-108 Photo 3.7.71 Marshy Land ............................................................................................................. 3-108 Photo 3.7.72 Full View from Borehole BH-1 ................................................................................ 3-109 Photo 3.7.73 Collapse at the Head of a Stream .............................................................................. 3-109 Photo 3.7.74 Road above the Houses ............................................................................................. 3-110 Photo 3.7.75 Cracks in the Road .................................................................................................... 3-110 Photo 3.7.76 View of the end of the Road (East Side Slope) ........................................................ 3-110 Photo 3.7.77 View of the Starting Point ........................................................................................ 3-111 Photo 3.7.78 Opening between Road and Boundary Line ............................................................. 3-111 Photo 3.7.79 Horizontal Open Cracks in the Wall ......................................................................... 3-111 Photo 3.7.80 Open Cracks in the Foundation ................................................................................ 3-111 Photo 3.7.81 Middle of the Slope .................................................................................................. 3-112 Photo 3.7.82 Slope above House19 ............................................................................................... 3-112 Photo 3.7.83 Masonry Retaining Wall behind House 19 ............................................................... 3-112 Photo 3.7.84 Steps on the Lower Slope ......................................................................................... 3-113 Photo 3.7.85 Swelling on the Road ................................................................................................ 3-113 Photo 3.7.86 Cracks in the Concrete Wall ..................................................................................... 3-113 Photo 3.7.87 Masonry Retaining Wall in front of the Road .......................................................... 3-114 Photo 3.7.88 View of the Ocean Side from House 19 ................................................................... 3-114 Photo 3.7.89 Damage to House (1) ................................................................................................ 3-115 Photo 3.7.90 Main Scalp and Landslide Toe ................................................................................. 3-116 Photo 3.7.91 Damage to House(2) ................................................................................................. 3-116 Photo 3.7.92 Landslide Plan Map, 2nd Reconnaissance at, 22nd February 2013 .......................... 3-117 Photo 3.7.93 Damage on the Outer Wall of House(1), Large Open Crack Grew .......................... 3-117 Photo 3.7.94 House (1) was Tilting as Result of Landslide Activity, Causing a Large Gap with

the Neighboring House ........................................................................................... 3-117 Photo 3.7.95 Open crack in the room of House (1) ....................................................................... 3-118 Photo 3.7.96 The cracks and steps in the room of House (1) ......................................................... 3-118 Photo 3.7.97 The Outside Wall of House (1) was Completely Broken ......................................... 3-118

xix

Photo 3.7.98 New Open Cracks in the Upper Part of House (1) .................................................... 3-118 Photo 3.10.1 Sprawl to Slope Area in Vallée Pitot ........................................................................ 3-165 Photo 5.2.1 Upper Side of the Blockage of the Canal ..................................................................... 5-18 Photo 5.2.2 Lower Side of the Blockage of the Canal ..................................................................... 5-18 Photo 5.2.3 Seen below the Blockage .............................................................................................. 5-19 Photo 5.2.4 Seen above the Blockage .............................................................................................. 5-19 Photo 6.3.1 Scenes of Interview Survey .......................................................................................... 6-67 Photo 6.3.2 Handbook ..................................................................................................................... 6-70 Photo 6.3.3 Awareness Activity for Residents Using the Handbook (Chitrakoot) ........................... 6-70 Photo 7.3.1 1st Technical Transfer Seminar ....................................................................................... 7-4 Photo 7.3.2 2nd Technical Transfer Seminar ...................................................................................... 7-5 Photo 7.3.3 3rd Technical Transfer Seminar ..................................................................................... 7-6 Photo 7.4.1 Photo of “Fundamentals and Basics on Landslides” ...................................................... 7-8 Photo 7.4.2 Photo of “Landslide Reconnaissance” ............................................................................ 7-8 Photo 7.4.3 Photo of “Monitoring device” ........................................................................................ 7-9 Photo 7.4.4 Photo of “Land Use Policy for Landslide Disaster” ..................................................... 7-10 Photo 7.4.5 Photo of “Interpretation of Aerial Photo for Landslide” .............................................. 7-10 Photo 7.4.6 Photo of “Landslide Investigation/Analysis/Monitoring” ............................................ 7-11 Photo 7.4.7 Photo of “Geotechnical Site Characterization and Constant Volume Direct Shear

Test” .......................................................................................................................... 7-12 Photo 7.4.8 Photo of “Training of the Landslide Monitoring” ........................................................ 7-12 Photo 7.4.9 Photo of “Monitoring Result and Early Warning” ....................................................... 7-13 Photo 7.4.10 Photo of “Review of Planning Policy Guidance” ....................................................... 7-14 Photo 7.4.11 Photo of “Stability Analysis and Countermeasures” .................................................. 7-14 Photo 7.4.12 Photo of “Monitoring log for Pilot Site” .................................................................... 7-15 Photo 7.4.13 Photo of “Countermeasure Works 1” ......................................................................... 7-15 Photo 7.5.1 The 2nd Training in Japan in 2013 ................................................................................ 7-20 Photo8.5.1 Participants of the Seminar (5th March 2015) ................................................................ 8-13 Photo8.5.2 Presentation by the Neighbouring Islands (5th March 2015) ......................................... 8-13 Photo8.5.3 Explaining the Monitoring System and Countermeasure Works in Chitrakoot (6th

March 2015) .............................................................................................................. 8-15 Photo8.5.4 Group Photo taken at Grand Sable (6th March 2015) ................................................... 8-15

xx

Abbreviations

Abbreviation English

AAP Africa Adaptation Programme

AC Advisory Committee

AF Adaptation Fund

AFD Agence Française de Développement

AFP Adaptation Fund Programme

BA Building Act

BLUPG The Building and Land Use Permit Guide

CCIC Climate Change Information Center

C/P Counterpart

CA Capacity Assessment

CADMAC Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Management Committee

CC Crisis Committee

CCD Climate Change Division

CD Capacity Development

CD Consolidated Drained test

CDEMA Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency

CEB The Central Electricity Board

CONDC The Cyclone and Other Natural Disasters Committee

CONDS Cyclone and Other Natural Disasters Scheme

CSO Central Statistics Office

CU (CU-bar) Consolidated Undrained test

CWA The Central Water Authority

DEM Digital Elevation Model

DRR Disaster Risk Reduction

EU European Union

F/S Feasibility Study

FAS First Aid Service

Fs Safety Factor/Factor of Safety

GDP Gross Domestic Product

GIS Government Information Service

GIS Geographic Information System

GL Ground Level

GSMaP Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation

HFA Hyogo Framework for Action

IC/R Inception Report

ICZM Integrated Coastal Zone Management

IEC Information, Education, and Communication

IOC(COI) Indian Ocean Commission (Commission de l'Océan Indien)

IP Plasticity Index/(Index of Plasticity)

ISO International Organization for Standardization

JET JICA Expert Team

JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency

xxi

JICE Japan International Corporation Center

LDRM Landslide Disaster Risk Management

LGA Local Government Act, 2003

LL Liquid Limit

LMU Landslide Management Unit

M/M Minutes of Meeting

Mauritius The Republic of Mauritius

MBC Mauritius Broadcasting Corporation

MEHR Ministry of Education and Human Resources

MESDDBM Ministry of Environment, Sustainable Development, Disaster and Beach Management

MGCW Ministry of Gender Equality, Child Development and Family Welfare

MHL Ministry of Housing and Lands

MHQL Ministry of Health and Quality of Life

MID Maurice Ile Durable

MLG Ministry of Local Government & Outer Islands

MoESD Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development

MoFED Ministry of Finance and Economic Development

MPI Ministry of Public Infrastructure and Land Transport

MMS Mauritius Meteorological Services

MSS Ministry of Social Security, National Solidarity and Reform Institutions

MTEF Medium-Term Expenditure Framework

MTL Ministry of Tourism and Leisure

MTSRT Ministry of Tertiary Education, Science, Research and Technology

NDOCC National Disaster and Operations Coordination Centre

NDRMCC National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Center

NDS National Development Strategy

NDU National Development Unit

NGO Non-Governmental Organization

ODA Official Development Assistance

OPS Outline Planning Schemes

P.Fs Planning/Designed Factor of Safety

P/R Progress Report

PBB Programme-Based Budgeting

PDA Planning and Development Act

PEFA Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability

PFM Public Financial Management

PIU Planning and Implementation Units

PL Plastic Limit

PMO Prime Minister’s Office

PMS Performance Management System

PPG Planning Policy Guidance

PS Permanent Secretary

PVC Polyvinyl Chloride

R/D Record of Discussion

RRU Repair and Rehabilitation Unit

SC Steering Committee

xxii

SIDS Small Island Developing States

SPT Standard Penetration Test

SWI Soil Water Index

TAS Treasury Accounting System

TCPA Town and Country Planning Act

The Disasters Scheme The Cyclone and Other Natural Disasters Scheme

The Project The Project of Landslide Management in the Republic of Mauritius

TICAD IV The Fourth Tokyo International Conference on African Development

TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission

UNDP The United Nations Development Programme

WCDR World Conference on Disaster Reduction

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

1

Digest This report is a Final Report (hereinafter F/R) which covers the results of all activities for the Project of Landslide Management in the Republic of Mauritius (hereinafter the Project) according to the Record of Discussion (hereinafter R/D) agreed upon between the Ministry of Public Infrastructure and Land Transport (hereinafter MPI), of the Republic of Mauritius (hereinafter Mauritius) and the Japan International Cooperation Agency (hereinafter JICA).

As for the introduction in Chapter 1, the background/outcomes/scope/schedule of the Project and the main activities are described.

JICA has dispatched 14 experts (hereinafter JET, or JICA Expert Team) who specialize in investigation, analysis, design and countermeasures of landslides. The Project is conducted with members of the Repair and Rehabilitation Unit/ Landslide Management Unit (hereinafter RRU/LMU) in MPI as Counterparts (hereinafter the C/P) from May 2012 to March 2015.

The objectives of the Project are; 1) Formulation of a landslide management plan to establish a landslide monitoring system, 2) Implementation of the F/S and pilot project to examine, carry out and learn specific approaches, 3) Improvement of landslide management skills at RRU/LMU and other related institutions.

For the basic survey in Chapter 2, the topography, the geology, landslide inventory, existing countermeasures, social survey, organizations and systems and economic survey on the entire Mauritius area are described.

Mauritius is a volcanic island with a volcanic plateau of 300 - 400m formed by these craters. The island consists of basaltic flows and the geological history began approximately 10 million years ago and there were two cycles of volcanic activity involved in the formation of the island. The average annual rainfall amount is about 2,000mm and almost 70% is concentrated during the rainy season (December - May). Many large-scale cyclones occur during the rainy season, causing most of the landslide disasters to occur during this season.

Reconnaissance has been conducted for the 32 landslide hazard areas selected in the "Cyclone and Other Natural Disasters Scheme 2011-2012 (hereinafter the Disaster Scheme)" and several of the 32 landslide hazard areas were divided, bringing the total to 37 areas. The 37 hazard areas are classified into nine (9) kinds of disasters: landslide, slope failure, rock fall, debris flow, stream erosion, damage of embankment, wall damage, house damage, and land subsidence (cave-in). A landslide inventory and a hazard evaluation have been implemented for the 37 areas based on aerial photo interpretation, site survey and checking for existing countermeasures.

Social condition such as land use, population, poverty and water resource and economical condition such as economic indices (GDP, etc.), economic policy and budget have been organized. The questionnaire for 300 households has revealed the resident consciousness for landslide disasters, countermeasures and evacuation, which is a fundamental data for the policy of measures.

Regarding the organizations and systems, the Disaster Scheme mentions the responsibility and roles of 7 ministries and 11 organizations for emergency situations on natural disasters, especially that National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Centre (hereinafter

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2

NDRRMC) in Prime Minister Office undertakes a main role in disaster planning and coordination for every level on the central/local governments and establishes strategies for the disasters. RRU/LMU conducts monitoring, investigation, emergency response for landslides.

Under the landslide management plan 1 (survey and result) in Chapter 3, the identification of landslide hazard areas, topographic survey, geological survey, monitoring, geophysical exploration, drilling survey, field reconnaissance, disaster inspection, the review and recommendation for the Disaster Scheme as well as the Planning Policy Guidance (hereinafter PPG) and preparation of “Technical Guideline for initial survey” and “Procedure Manual for landslides” are described.

The targeted landslides in the Project are three (3) sites, Chitrakoot, Quatre Soeurs and Vallee Pitot by the hazard evaluation and the request form MPI. The following investigations and analyses have been conducted.

Table List of the Investigations and Analyses in the 3 Priority Areas (source: JET)

Chitrakoot Quatre Soeurs Vallee Pitot

Topographic survey

plan map (1/500) 1.8 km2

(1800m×1000m)0.16 km2

(400m×400m) 0.005km2

(70m×70m) cross section (1/100) 3 lines 1 line 1 line

Site reconnaissance 1 set 1 set 1 set

Laboratory test physical test 6 samples 2 samples dynamics test 3 samples water quality 10 samples 7 samples

Monitoring

rain gauge 1 1 extensometer 4 2 2 inclinometer 2 strain gauge 2 2 ground water level meter 2 2 ground water level (manual)

6

Geophysical exploration

elastic wave exploration 6 lines (1955m) two-dimensional resistivity exploration

6 lines (1925m)

Drilling survey 6 holes (260m) 2 holes (42m) Survey on damage to houses 1 set 1 set 1 set

In addition to the above mentioned investigations and analyses, a disaster inspection has been implemented for the 37 hazard areas in the Disaster Scheme so that the areas have been classified into three (3) ranks (A, B, C) according to their level of risk. The issues and proposal on the early warning and evaluation protocol in the Disaster Scheme as well as the development control of landslides in the PPG have been discussed. “Technical Guideline for initial survey” and “Procedure Manual for landslides” have been published based on these investigations and analyses.

Under the landslide management plan 2 (analysis and interpretation) in Chapter 4, the geological interpretation, the interpretation for monitoring, the analysis for soil water index, stability analysis and susceptibility assessment are described.

The features and the policy of countermeasures have been discussed on the three (3) priority sites based on the results of the landslide management plan 1 in Chapter 3.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3

In Chitrakoot, although the entire block, which was presumably activated in 2005 and 2008, has already become stable, two small blocks, “A block (L=300m, W=150m)” and “B block (L=100m, W=200m)”, have been activated. The presumed slip surface is around GL-6m at the boundary between the base rock (Basalt) and the soft surface/colluvial soil. The landslide moves downward intermittently by rising of groundwater with rainfall so that the safety factor Fs is assumed to be 0.98. The rainfall is flooded on the surface due to poor drainage system, which would become a trigger by penetrating excessively into the ground of the landslide area. Therefore the establishment of surface and subsurface drainage systems is urgently needed.

In Quatre Soeurs, there seems to be an entire block by topographical interpretation, which is unclear and stable now. Although two small blocks, “A block (L=60m, W=50m)” and “B block (L=150m, W=100m)”, were presumably activated by 230mm accumulative rainfall in 2005 and 2008, they have been stabilized in the Project period. Since the landslides are stabilized, the safety factor Fs is assumed to be 1.00. The rainfall is flooded on the surface due to poor drainage system, which would become a trigger by penetrating excessively into the ground of the landslide area.

In Vallee Pitot, a small block, “A block (L=40m, W=40m)”, has been activated. The entire block (L=80m, W=100m) started to be activated in February 2013. It is presumed that the type is a surface landslide in colluvial soil/sand/clay. The landslide moves downward intermittently by rising of groundwater with rainfall so that the safety factor Fs is assumed to be 0.98. The rainfall is flooded on the surface due to poor drainage system, which would become a trigger by penetrating excessively into the ground of the landslide area.

In addition, thresholds of the early warning and evacuation using the Soil Water Index have been discussed by data in Mauritius Meteorological Service and of the Global Satellite Map of Precipitation (GSMaP) in Chitrakoot and Quatre Soeurs where there are history records on landslides.

For the Feasibility Study (hereinafter F/S) in priority areas in Chapter 5, the priority sites and pilot project sites, policy of countermeasures, Environmental Impact Assessment, the Pilot Project evaluation, the promotion of fund raising and the organizational reinforcement plan are described.

JET decided Chitrakoot as a Pilot site based on the landslide investigation, risk assessment, economic loss, countermeasure cost and request from MPI. For Chitrakoot, especially highest risk area “A block”, structural countermeasures such as drainage ditches by horizontal drilling were planned in order to avoid excessive water supply into the landslide area and to drain water safely away from the area. Environmental Impact Assessment has been conducted and their mitigation plan was reflected to the countermeasures. The pilot project evaluations (pre, interim, post) have been implemented from the viewpoints of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability.

In Quatre Soeurs, the Mauritius Government is negotiating with local residents in the landslide area to relocate them to a safer place and has had meetings with them more than ten (10) times since 2010. JET has supported MPI regarding the preparation of the explanation materials and the meetings. Although the Mauritius Government has proposed a place to relocate the residents, an agreement has not been reached with the residents, therefore the relocation has not yet been completed.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

4

In Vallee Pitot, since a landslide block started to activate through February to May in 2013, the land mass destroyed a channel (20m) and has blocked it completely. JET proposed to C/P that emergency responses and permanent countermeasures after geological survey and monitoring and has discussed with MPI regarding this matter. MPI started the geological surveys and the monitoring there and is planning countermeasures.

Budget allocation after 2014 for the 37 hazard areas (including the three (3) priority sites) in the Disaster Scheme has been promoted by proposing the policy of investigation and countermeasures. MPI applied the budget for investigation/analysis/design/supervision for the 37 areas; 16,500,000Rs in 2014, 55,650,000Rs in 2015, 40,100,000Rs in 2016 and 44,700,000Rs in 2017.

Regarding the organizational reinforcement plan, JET proposed tasks to be conducted by organizing the current issues and purposes on RRU/LMU and has fulfilled, as mid/long term objectives, the request of six (6) full-time engineers, the budget application and the concretization of responsibility/role of related organizations, from standpoints of technological improvement, personnel securement and improvement of administrative ability. In addition, some of C/Ps have been dispatched to Japan to study at graduate university (two (2) years) and to train in disaster management (two (2) months).

For the Pilot Project in Chapter 6, the structural countermeasure in Chitrakoot, the early warning and evacuation system in the targeted three (3) sites, IEC (Information, Education and Communication) and stakeholder meetings are described.

As for the structural countermeasures in Chitrakoot, JET and C/P have implemented the basic design/detailed design/cost estimation/construction plan/bidding/contract/construction/ supervision for a large-scale channel, a horizontal drilling, an open/blind ditch, a surface ditch, a river improvement (widening and revetment work), a bridge and a collecting channel for the purposes of limiting the inflow of water into the landslide area and draining of water away from the landslide area. Since it takes time (around one (1) year) to get an official approval of land use for construction in Mauritius, JET and C/P prioritize the construction with consideration of safety and decided that JET would implement the higher prioritized works as a pilot project before the rainy season (December in 2014) and MPI would implement the remaining works after the rainy season with their own budget. The contract for the pilot project was awarded by competitive bidding in June 2014 at MPI office to a local construction company for 14,045,723Rs (lowest price). The construction was started on August 2014 and completed in December 2014 (around five (5) month). During the pilot project, the structure and alignment of the channel and vegetation works were locally modified and the river improvement at the bottom part (L=47m) was canceled because of a complaint from a landowner. The canceled works will be conducted by MPI after the rainy season. The monitoring such that using as groundwater level meters, extensometers and pipe strain gauges will be continuously conducted to identify the effectiveness of the countermeasures after the construction.

Regarding the early warning system, JET proposed new thresholds at which to issue warnings based on extensometer readings and house damage obtained in the monitoring of the Project. This proposal was the result of investigations looking into issues of the current system in the Disaster Scheme. The proposed threshold is; “preparation (pre stage)” is 20mm/month in extensometer or new cracks in houses, “warning (stage 1)” is 5mm/hour in extensometer or crack opening in houses, “evacuation (stage 2)” is 20mm/hour in extensometer or additional

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

5

cracks in/around houses, “warning lifted (stage 3)” is 0mm/hour in extensometer or no anomalies in houses. The revolving lights (red and yellow) and sirens have been installed to enable voluntary evacuation using the thresholds. The yellow light informs “warning (stage 1)” and the red light and siren inform “evacuation (stage 2)”. Liaison members and communication system as well as evacuation routes/areas for the early warning and evacuation have been established. MPI will continuously work to raise awareness of local residents under normal conditions, and check the areas and give advice to NDRRMC in emergency condition.

For IEC in the Project, JET has supported MPI to transmit the related information such as disaster, warning, evacuation and land use etc. through various media to residents. One of the main activities of IEC is stakeholder meetings for the residents in the three (3) priority areas, which were held five (5) times at the beginning of the Project, at the completion of implementation plan (draft), at the finalization of the implementation plan, at the beginning of the pilot project and at the end of the pilot project to get consensus and understanding from the residents. JET ascertained the level of understanding of the residents of the three (3) priority areas on how to respond to an early warning or evacuation order by questionnaire, and proposed measures and activities to be conducted by MPI. Newsletters in English/French (No.1-5) and “Landslide Disaster Prevention Handbook” were published and distributed to the local residents as well as the related organizations.

With respect to the technical transfer in Chapter 7, methodology and structure of the technical transfer, workshop, technical transfer seminar, training in Japan, Steering Committee and advisory committee in Japan are described.

In order to conduct effective technical transfers, the methodology and structure have been reconsidered based on the purposes and issues of OJT (On-the-Job Training), the Pilot Project, and the training in Japan. JET is composed of four (4) technical groups; a management group, an investigation/analysis group, a design/construction group and a soft countermeasure group for smooth technical transfer. MPI, as one entire team, has received technical training from all four (4) groups so that MPI has been able to understand whole knowledge and technology on the management and countermeasure on landslides.

In addition to the OJT, three (3) technical transfer seminars on the landslide countermeasures and 13 workshops on certain themes such as aerial photo interpretation and stability analysis etc. were held through the Project period. The trainings in Japan were held on November 20th – December 15th in 2012 and August 14th – September 8th in 2013 (both for 26 days) with participation of five (5) C/P members for each training (total ten (10) members). The Steering Committees in Mauritius and the Advisory Committee in Japan were held four (4) times for each committee to confirm the policy/methodology/results/discussion on the Project.

As for environment, climate change adaptation and disaster management in Chapter 8, the landslide management plan and the climate change adaptation plan have been discussed and proposed to the Government of Mauritius based on all of the activities in the Project.

As for the proposal for future tasks in Chapter 9, the tasks for each item on landslides in the Project have been summarized. Proposals on formulation of a landslide management plan in Mauritius are summarized as follows in consideration of the hypotheses for mechanisms and countermeasures on landslides.

1. The following basic surveys are necessary to grasp the landslide activities, volumes,

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

6

areas and the relation with circumferences.

2. The Disaster Scheme and the PPG are reviewed to propose the early warnings and evaluation protocols and other soft countermeasures.

3. The current activities on landslides are determined by the stability analysis using landslide cross sections based on the basic surveys.

4. The relations among the activities, groundwater level and rainfalls are discussed with the results of the monitoring.

5. Best countermeasures (hard and soft) are considered from the viewpoint of the activities, priorities, request form residents, and budgets.

6. For hard countermeasures, suitable drainage works are selected based on the results of the investigation on surface/ground water conditions. Horizontal drilling is judged to be effective from the results of the pilot project.

7. For soft countermeasures, early warning/evaluation system using a threshold for each landslide is operated. The soft countermeasures are useful until the completion of the construction of hard countermeasures.

Chapter 1

Introduction

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

1-1

1 Introduction

1.1 General

This report is a Final Report (hereinafter F/R) which covers the results of all activities for the Project of Landslide Management in the Republic of Mauritius (hereinafter the Project) according to the Record of Discussion (hereinafter R/D) agreed upon between the Ministry of Public Infrastructure and Land Transport (hereinafter MPI), of the Republic of Mauritius (hereinafter Mauritius) and the Japan International Cooperation Agency.

JICA dispatches 14 experts (hereinafter JET, or JICA Expert Team) who specialize in investigation, analysis, design and countermeasure on landslide. The Project is conducted with members of the Repair and Rehabilitation Unit/ Landslide Management Unit (hereinafter RRU/LMU) in MPI as Counterparts (hereinafter the C/P) from May 2012 to March 2015.

1.2 Background of the Project

Mauritius is vulnerable to climate change, particularly landslide issues are becoming more serious due to recent natural disasters resulting from environmental changes and the increase of structures because of tourism and land development on steep slopes. Mauritius has been taking disaster prevention measures as shown in Table 1.2.1. Although the country wishes to draw plans, understand risks and implement measures on scientific and technical grounds in consideration of environmental burden and safety management, it has not yet found a fundamental solution due to the lack of experts and engineers, and the lack of publicity of climate change adaption measures and disaster prevention administration to local communities.

Table 1.2.1 Overview of Landslide Damage and Countermeasures in Mauritius (source: JET)

Year Landslide Countermeasures 1986 A large scale landslide occurred in the La Butte area (1500 houses were damaged, 4

main water pipes and high voltage power lines were broken). 1989 JICA’s Port Louis City Landslide Countermeasure Planning Study began (1990). 1994 JICA’s Port Louis City Landslide Protection Project was approved (completed in

1998). 2005 A large scale landslide occurred in Chitrakoot (54 houses were damaged).

A landslide occurred in Quatre Soeurs (11 houses were affected). 2006 A landslide reoccurred in Chitrakoot (14 houses were damaged) 2007 An elementary school in the landslide hazard area in Chitrakoot was closed. 2008 Landslides reoccurred in Chitrakoot and Quatre Soeurs (monitoring began). 2009 The Cyclone and Other Natural Disasters Scheme was established.

Landslide Management Unit (LMU) was established in MPI.

Against such background, upon the request for technical assistance in landslide management from the government of Mauritius to the government of Japan, we have decided to carry out the Project for Technical Cooperation.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

1-2

1.3 Objectives of the Project

1.3.1 Objective

The goal is to have the Feasibility Study (hereinafter F/S) and landslide management plan approved by the Government of Mauritius, and for the relevant organizations to implement them.

1.3.2 Desired Outcome

The risk of landslides and other slope disasters is reduced, and the safety for the residents in the landslide area is secured.

1.3.3 Outcome of the Project

1) Formulation of a landslide management plan to establish a landslide monitoring system.

2) Implementation of the F/S and pilot project to examine, carry out and learn specific approaches.

3) Improvement of landslide management skills at RRU/LMU and other related Institutions.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

1-3

1.4 Scope of the Project

1.4.1 Project Areas

The project area is the Mauritius Island, and the JICA Expert Team prioritize 37 high risk areas designated in the Cyclone and Other Natural Disasters Scheme (hereinafter the Disasters Scheme).

Figure 1.4.1 Location Map of the Project Area (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

1-4

1.4.2 List of JICA Expert Team and Counterparts

The C/P of the Project is MPI and, the C/P members are mainly composed of RRU/LTU in Civil Engineering Division in MPI.

The names of the JICA Expert Team (hereinafter JET) members and counterparts are listed below. Table 1.4.1 indicates the role of each member.

Table 1.4.1 List of JICA Expert Team and Counterparts (source: JET)

JICA Experts Field of Expertise Counterpart (MPI) 1 Kensuke ICHIKAWA Chief adviser

Mahmad Reshad JEWON

Deevarajan CHINASAMY

Vishwahdass RAMDHAN

Selvanaden Pearia ANADACHEE

Mohammad Khalid MOSAHEB

Rameswurdass RAMDHAN

Lalitsingh BISSESSUR

Bhoopendra DABYCHARUN

2 Takeshi KUWANO Vice chief adviser/ Landslide management

3 Tomoharu IWASAKI Landslide survey and analysis 4 Fumihiko YOKOO Landslide monitoring 5 Yoji KASAHARA Geophysical prospecting 6 Masami SUGITA GIS/Topographic survey 7 Takashi HARA Design/Cost estimation

8 Takayoshi KURATA Water quality management/ environmental and social consideration

9 Yoshizumi GONAI Policy and planning of urban development and land use

10 Shingo ICHIKAWA Institution/system analysis/capacity development 1

11 Yurie KAWABATA Information, education and communication

12 Yosuke YAMAMOTO Coordinator/Landslide management assistant

13 Haruka YOSHIDA Coordinator/Institution/system analysis/capacity development 2

14 Makoto TOKUDA Coordinator/Policy and planning of urban development and land use assistant

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

1-5

1.5 Major Activities

The following components have been conducted from the commencement of the Project in May 2012 up to now (Figure 1.5.1).

Component 1 “Basic survey” Component 2 “Formulation of a Landslide Management Plan”, Component 3 “Implementation of the Feasibility Study (F/S) in Priority Areas” Component 4 “Implementation of the Pilot Project”

For the basic survey (Chapter 2), the site reconnaissance results for the 37 landslide areas and their countermeasures, both structural and non-structural have been summarized based on the data collection and analysis. Social survey, survey related to institutions/systems and economic survey were implemented by mainly data collection and interview surveys. As a part of the social survey, the local resident consciousness on landslide management and countermeasures were summarized using questionnaire surveys for the local residents.

Under the landslide management plan (Chapter 3-4) a drilling survey and monitoring were conducted for the three target landslide areas selected by the basic survey. Stability analysis, susceptibility assessment and establishment of management plan for landslides have been conducted based on the drilling survey/monitoring analysis/geophysical exploration. The technical guideline for initial survey and the technical guideline have been established from the viewpoint of the site survey and the analysis. In addition, an entire landslide management plan, which includes a proposed early warning/evacuation system, a proposed Planning Policy Guidance (PPG) and the establishment of an improvement plan of organizations/institutes, has been prepared based on a review of existing guidelines, policies and systems.

The F/S in priority areas (Chapter 5) consisted of a plan/cost estimation/construction plan of countermeasures for the three target landslide areas, Pilot Project evaluation, budget allocation and proposal in MPI, an Environmental Impact Assessment and a sustainable organization system for landslide countermeasures have been implemented from both standpoints of “hard” countermeasures (structural countermeasures) and “soft” countermeasures (early warning system, etc.)

For the Pilot Project (Chapter 6), Chitrakoot has been selected as a target area, and the basic design, detailed design and cost estimation of the hard countermeasures have been conducted so that the drainage works and horizontal drilling works have been constructed in the area. During the construction, effort was made to ensure a sufficient exchange of information, education and communication (IEC) with respect to the related organizations and stakeholders (i.e. through meetings) to gain the understanding of the local residents. The early warning system by installation of monitoring devices has been established in the area, and the protocol for evacuation was proposed in the “Disaster Scheme”.

As for the technical transfer (Chapter 7), workshops on specific themes and a series of technical transfer seminars on landslide countermeasures are being conducted as well as the OJT (on-the-job training) in the Project. The Steering Committees and Advisory Committee in Japan to validate the procedure of the Project have been conducted with related organizations. Training in Japan has been successfully completed twice during the Project.

With respect to environment, climate change adaptation and disaster management (Chapter 8), the landslide management plan and the climate change adaptation plan have been discussed

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

1-6

and proposed to the Government of Mauritius based on tall of the activities in the Project.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

1-7

Figure 1.5.1 Flowchart of Project Activity (source: JET)

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3Rainy season Rainy season Rainy season

Report

SC

FY2014

2014 2015

Calendar MonthFY2013

YearContract Year First Year

Japanese Fiscal Year

2013

FY2012

2012Second Year

▲IC/R ▲P/R

▲SC

Seminar

Technology exchanges with southwest  Indian Ocean countries

Training in Japan

Seminar

▲SC

Workshop

F/R submisson

IC/R writing

P/R writing

IC/Rexplanation/discussion P/R explanation/discussion  IT/R writing IT/R explanation/discussion  DF/writing

DF/R explanation/discussion

▲IT/R

▲SC

▲DF/R F/R▲

▲SC

Training in Japan

Component 1Basic Survey

Component 2Formulation of a 

Landslide Management Plan

Component 3Implementation of the Feasibility Study (F/S) in Priority Areas 

Component 4Implementation of the Pilot Project

Component  5Technology Transfer

Component 5Report 

Writing/Explanation/Discussion

1‐1 Collection, organization and analysis of existing materials and information1‐2 Landslide inventory survey

1‐3 Survey on structural/non‐structural measures

1‐4 Social survey (questionnaires, etc.)

1‐5 Survey Related to organizations/systems

1‐6 Economic survey

2‐1 Identification of landslide hazard areas based on the landslide database

2‐2 Monitoringanalysis of landslide activities

2‐3 Stability analysis

2‐4 Susceptibility assessment

2‐5 Formulation of a landslide countermeasure plan

2‐6 Formulation of a monitoring plans

2‐7 Review of the current warning/evacuation procedures, and recommendations

2‐8 Formulation of a technical guideline for the initial survey2‐9 Review of the Planning Policy Guidance and Recommendations

2‐10 Formulation of a procedure manual including the technical guideline

2‐11 Formulation of an organizational reinforcement plan for RRU/LMU

2‐12 Formulation of a project implementation plan2‐13 Stakeholder meetings

2‐14 Technology transfer Seminars

3‐1 Selection of priority areas

3‐2 Implementation of the F/S in priority areas

3‐3 Project evaluation (technical, economic and social aspects)

3‐4 Environmental impact assessment (EIA)

3‐5 Technology transfer seminars

3‐6 Promotion of fund raising

4‐1 Selection of project areas and design

4‐3 Implementation of the pilot project 

4‐4 Feedback to the landslide management plan and F/S

4‐2 Stakeholder meetings

Chapter 2

Basic Survey

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-1

2 Basic Survey

2.1 Topography

Figure 2.1.1 indicates the full view map of Mauritius. It is a volcanic island with craters distributed continuously from north to south of the island. A volcanic plateau of 300 - 400m is formed by these craters, with the highest peak being Mt. La Petite Riviere Noire (828m) in the southwest of the island. The outer rim of the craters is characterized by steep slopes while the coast side is generally flat. Also, faults of NNE-SSW and NW-SW directions are distributed along the outer rim of the craters, and are believed to be caused by volcanic activity.

Figure 2.1.1 Full View Map of Mauritius1

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-2

2.2 Geology and Rainfall

Figure 2.2.1 indicates the geological map of Mauritius. The island is a volcanic island and the basaltic flows are classified into 3 groups which are ancient lava series, intermediate lava series and recent lava series. The geological history began approximately 10 million years ago and there were two cycles of volcanic activity involved in the formation of the island. First cycle took part mostly at the south of the island, consisting basaltic and breccias of ancient lava series and formed a lava plateau. The second cycle took part mostly at the north of the island consisting basaltic and tuff from intermediate and recent lava series and deposited above the layer of ancient lava layer. Later, weathered colluvial and pyroclastic materials from the steep slope of mountain collapsed and deposited at the foot of the mountain, creating landslides within the tuff and colluvial deposits. Figure 2.2.2 indicates a cross section of a typical landslide (colluvial landslide): La Butte landslide.

Figure 2.2.1 Geological Map of Mauritius2

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-3

Colluvium is supplied from mountains made of basalt, and, with pyroclastic materials, deposits at the foot of such mountains. Colluvium and pyroclastic materials are weak, and as a result landslides can be triggered by heavy rain and development activity - residential land development or road construction.

Figure 2.2.2 Cross Section of the Typical Landslide (Colluvial Landslide): La Butte Landslide3

Figure 2.2.3 indicates the annual rainfall amount in Mauritius (1971~2000). The average annual rainfall amount is about 2000mm and almost 70% is concentrated during the rainy season (December ~ May). Many large-scale cyclones occur during the rainy season, causing most of the landslide disasters to occur during this season. Also, the annual rainfall amount at the mountain area in the center of the island is more than 4000mm, which, in addition to the expansion of development in the mountain area, is causing more landslide disasters.

Colluvium

Pyroclastic material

Basalt

Clay of Pyroclastic material

School Dense housing

Road

Mosque

Mt Signal

Sea

Earth removal work

Trace of reservoir

Estimated slip surface

Mt Signal

Landslide area

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-4

Figure 2.2.3 Annual Rainfall Amount in Mauritius (1971~2000)4

Isohyetal Map of Mauritius (1971-2000)

Long Term Average Rainfall Over MauritiusPeriod 1971 – 2000

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-5

2.3 Landslide Inventory Survey

To consolidate landslide information, the characteristics of landslides, evaluation results, and types and scale of countermeasures will be listed in a chart and compiled into a database. This database will allow us to promote the understanding of landslides and efficient disaster management in Mauritius.

In the landslide inventory survey, a reconnaissance will be conducted for the 32 landslide hazard areas selected in the "Cyclone and Other Natural Disasters Scheme 2011-2012" (Table 2.3.1). However, as a result of having investigated the sites, several of the 32 landslide hazard areas were divided, bringing the total to 37 areas. Table 2.3.2 lists the 37 landslide hazard areas after having reviewed the landslide hazard areas.

Table 2.3.1 32 Landslide Hazard Areas Selected in the Disasters Scheme5

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-6

Table 2.3.2 Revised 37 Landslide Hazard Areas (source: JET)

No. Area name

Pamplemousses/Riviere du Rempart District Council 1 Temple Road, Creve Coeur 2 Congomah Village Council (Ramlakhan) 3 Congomah Village Council (Leekraj) 4 Congomah Village Council (Frederick) 5 Congomah Village Council (Blackburn Lanes) 6 Les Mariannes Community Centre (Road area) 7 Les Mariannes Community Centre (Resident area) 8 L'Eau Bouillie

Municipality of Port Louis 9 Chitrakoot, Vallee des Pretres

10 Vallee Pitot (near Eidgah) 11 LePouce Street 12 Justice Street (near Kalimata Mandir) 13 Mgr. Leen Street and nearby vicinity, La Butte 14 Pouce Stream 15 Old Moka Road, Camp Chapelon 16 Boulevard Victria, Montague Coupe

Black River District Council 17 Pailles : (i) access road to Les Guibies and along motorway, near flyover bridge 18 Pailles : (ii) access road Morcellement des Aloes from Avenue M.Leal (on hillside) 19 Pailles : (iii) soreze regin 20 Plaine Champagne Road, opposite "Musee Touche Dubois" 21 Chamarel : (i) near Reataurant Le Chamarel 22 Chamarel : (ii) Roadside 23 Gremde Riviere Noire Village Hall 24 Baie du Cap : (i) Near St Francois d'Assise Church 25 Baie du Cap :(ii) Maconde Region

GRAND PORT/SAVANNE DISTRICT COUNDIL 26 Riviere des Anguilles, near the bridge 27 Quatre Soeurs, Marie Jeanne, Jhummah Streert, Old Grand Port 28 Bambous Virieux, Rajiv Gandhi Street (near Bhavauy House), Impasse Bholoa 29 Cave in at Union Park, Rose Belle

MUNICIPALITY OF CUREPIPE 30 Trou-AUX-Cerfs 31 River Bank at Cite L'Oiseau 32 Louis de Rochecouste (Riviere Seche) 33 Piper Morcellement Piat

MUNICIPALITY OF QUATRE BORNES 34 Candos Hill at LallBahadoor Shastri and Mahatma Gandhi Avenues 35 Cavernous Area at Mgr Leen Avenue and Bassin

MUNICIPALITY OF BEAU BASSIN/ROSE HILL 36 Morcellement Hermitage, Coromandel 37 Montee S, GRNW

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-7

2.3.1 Classification of Hazard Area

The 37 landslide hazard areas, selected based on the "Cyclone and Other Natural Disasters Scheme 2011-2012", includes several disaster forms besides landslides (the object of this project). Therefore the 37 hazard areas are classified 9 kinds of disasters, given in Table 2.3.3, while Table 2.3.4 gives a description of the nine kinds of disasters.

General classification：At first, the 37 hazard areas selected based on the "Cyclone and Other Natural Disasters Scheme 2011-2012" are classified into two kinds of disaster, Slope disasters and Other disasters.

Sub classification：Then, Slope disasters are classified into Landslide, Slope failure, Rock fall, and Debris flow. Other disasters are classified into Stream erosion, Damage of embankment, Damage of wall, Damage of house, and Cavern.

Table 2.3.3 Classification of Hazard Area (source: JET)

General classification Sub classification Summary

Disaster

Slope 15 areas

Landslide 6 areasCan be classified as a Landslide Hazard Area

Slope failure 7 areas

Because it is not a "Landslide", it cannot be classified as a Landslide Hazard Area

Rock fall 1 areasDebris flow 1 areas

Other 22 areas

Stream erosion 10 areasDamage of Embankment

4 areas

Damage of wall 5 areasDamage of house 1 areasCavern 2 areas

Total 37 areas

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-8

Table 2.3.4 Description of the Disaster Type (source: JET)

Slope disaster Other disaster

Landslide

A landslide is a phenomenon where the soil mass on failure surfaces deep in the ground gradually shifts downward, triggered by heavy rain, an earthquake, river erosion or earthworks. Compared to slope failure, landslides are generally on a larger scale and occur on gentler slopes (about 5-30 degrees). Stream

erosion

Stream erosion is the phenomenon where the soil of the bank is removed by the flow of the river. It occurs in riverbanks where the flow of the river hits with the most force.Water might overflow when the level of the stream increases.

Slope failure

A slope failure is a mass becoming detached from a steep slope/cliff along surface with little or no shear displacement. Compared to landslides, the failure is rapid and on a small-scale, the inclination angle is a relatively high (over 30 degrees).

Damage of embankment

The collapse of the road embankment is often triggered by rainfall, infiltration of underground water, erosion by surface water, or a partial catchment. It can be caused by weak embankment material or by lack of soil compaction.

Rock fall

A rock fall is a phenomenon where foliated rocks and gravel start to fall down a slope as a result of enlarged cracks in the bedrock or outcropped rocks.

Damage of wall

The disaster of a retaining wall doesn't occur suddenly as with a rockfall etc., rather the deformation occurs over a comparatively long time. The survey should investigate: ・ condition around the retaining wall ・ main body of the retaining wall ・ history of the retaining wall

Debris flow

A debris flow is a phenomenon where soil and boulders are liquefied by surface water or groundwater and tend to flow downward rapidly through a mountain torrent.

Damage of house

A crack that occurs on the wall of a house may be caused by: ・ Lack of bearing capacity ・ Subsidence of foundation ground ・ Shoddy workmanship, etc.

Cavern

A cavern may be caused by: ・Infiltration of water from soak away ・Infiltration of water from improved pit, etc.

Present riverbed

Past riverbedwater colliding front

Rainfall

Cross section

Surfacewater

Surface water

Concentration ofsurface water

Signs of stream

settling

improved pitSoak away

Cavern

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-9

2.3.2 Site Reconnaissance

The site reconnaissance will be conducted for 37 landslide hazard areas selected in the Disasters Scheme, and hazard evaluation will be conducted by checking disaster focus points. In addition, for landslides and slope failures, aerial photograph interpretation is carried out to confirm distribution of the landslide topography.

a. Aerial Photographic Interpretation

Most active landslides are characterized by certain landslide landforms. Aerial photograph interpretation is effective for observing landforms over a wide area and the chronology of those landforms, and then for considering the relations between those features and landslides.

A stereoscope can be used to view images in stereo using stereo-pair aerial photographs. From the stereo image, landforms caused by landslide movement and geomorphological features can be identified.

Photo 2.3.1 Aerial Photograph Interpretation (source: JET)

Some typical characteristics of landslides are:

・ Cross-section profiles show steep (main scarp) to gentle (middle part of landslide) and steep (toe part of landslide) from upper part to lower part.

・ Contour lines of topographic maps are not parallel but winding and irregular.

・ Main scarps, steps, cracks, depressions, ponds and swamps can be seen on the gentle slope.

・ Clear steam lines sometimes appear on side of the landslide.

The legends of aerial photograph interpretation are shown in Table 2.3.5. Table 2.3.6 indicates a list of aerial photographs obtained from Ministry of Housing and Lands (hereinafter MHL). The scale of aerial photograph is about 1:10,000.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-10

Table 2.3.5 Legends of Aerial Photograph Interpretation (source: JET)

A. Main and/or lateral scarp of which crown is fresh and dissected

B. Mostly dissected crown

C. Definite and probable margin of landslide mass with a main scarp at the backward or upper slope

D. Landslide body margin without main scarp and crown symbols

E. Crack with steps

F. Spring water

G. River system and bleeding channel

Table 2.3.6 List of Aerial Photographs (source: JET)

Index No. Region Year Aerial photo No. Number of

photos

1 LES MARIANNES 1998 R 717 - R 728 1998 R 748 - R 752 1999 1926 - 1929 16

2 CREVE COEUR 1998 R 741 - R 747 1999 1920 - 1925 1991 53 - 55 16

3 G.R.N.W - PORT LOUIS 1997 0501 - 0503 1999 1911 - 1915 1999 1916 - 1919 12

4 QUATRE - BORNES 1997 608 - 613 1998 507 - 510 1999 1776 - 1782 18

5 CUREPIPE 1998 R 534 - R 538 1997 1340 - 1343 1997 1393 - 1396 13

6 UNION PARK 1999 1718 - 1719 2

7 RIVIERE DES ANGUILLES 1997 0139 - 0242 1997 1513 - 1515 1997 1527 - 1529 10

8 LA MIVOIE 1991 180 - 182 1991 199 - 200 5

9 CHAMAREL 1999 2072 - 2074 1998 R 650 - R 659 13

10 BAIE DU CAP 1998 R 297 - R 300 4

11 GRANDE RIVIERE SUD EST 1991 R 243 - R 244 1991 1568 - 1569 4

Total 113

The aerial photograph interpretation for landslides was carried out for 13 hazard areas, out of a total of 37, that were classified as a landslide or a slope failure. However, the aerial

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-11

photograph interpretation was not carried out when the scale of the disaster was too small to make it out properly, or when the disaster has occurred more recently than the aerial photo.

The results of aerial photograph interpretation are summarized in Figure 2.3.1 below, with a sample photo-map and landslide distribution map of Chitrakoot area. Table 2.3.7 indicates the result of aerial photograph interpretation.

Figure 2.3.1 Example of the Result of Aerial Photograph interpretation - Chitrakoot area (Left: Photo Map, Right: Landslide Distribution Map) (source: JET)

Table 2.3.7 Summary of the Aerial Photograph Interpretation (source: JET)

No Area name Classifica-

tion Interpreted

or Not Aerial photoNo.(Year)

Summary

6

Les Mariannes Community Centre

Slope failure

Interpreted R720-R721

(1998)

Behind the slope failure at the roadside, a landslide body margin without main scarp has been confirmed.

9 Chitrakoot, Landslide Interpreted 1922-1923

(1999) A clear main landslide was confirmed, and the definite margin of the several landslides were interpreted around it.

10 Vallee Pitot Landslide Not

interpreted 1919-1920

(1999)

Because a target area is small, the aerial photo cannot identify it. Around a target area, the certain landslide landforms were not confirmed.

13 La Butte Landslide Interpreted 1917-1918

(1999)

The landslide of La Butte occurred in 1986, and the definite margin of a landslide was confirmed by aerial photograph interpretation.

15 Old Moka Road

Landslide Interpreted 1916-1917

(1999) A landslide body margin without main scarp has been confirmed, and the landslide topography is not clear.

17

Pailles: (i) access road to Les Guibies

Slope failure

Not interpreted

1913-1914(1999)

Because a target area is small, the aerial photo cannot identify it. Around a target area, the certain landslide landforms were not confirmed.

19 Pailles : (iii) soreze regin

Slope failure

Not interpreted

0502-0503(1997)

Because it is later than the photography year, as for the disaster occurrence of the target area, the aerial photograph cannot confirm it. Around a target area, the certain landslide landforms were not confirmed.

20 Plaine Champagne Road

Slope failure

Interpreted R656,R657

(1998)

It was confirmed that the colluvium distributed around slope failure area. The cause of the slope failure is thought to be weak colluvium.

27 Quatre Soeurs

Landslide Interpreted R243,R244

(1991) The definite margin of several landslides was interpreted around the disaster area.

28 Bambous Virieux

Slope failure

Not interpreted

1568-1569(1991)

The target area could not be identified on the aerial photo because it is too small.

30 Trou-AUX-Cerfs

Slope failure

Not interpreted

1395-1396(1997)

It could not be confirmed on the aerial photo because the slope failure occurred after the photo was taken. No clearly distinguishable landslide landforms could be confirmed in the target area.

34 Candos Hill at Lall Bahadoor

Landslide Not

interpreted 1780-1781

(1991) The target area could not be identified on the aerial photo because it is too small. No clearly distinguishable landslide

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-12

Shastri landforms could be confirmed in the target area.

36 Morcellement Hermitage, Coromande

Slope failure

Not interpreted

1914-1915(1999)

The target area could not be identified on the aerial photo because it is too small. No clearly distinguishable landslide landforms could be confirmed in the target area.

b. Process of landslide hazard evaluation of site reconnaissance

In the site reconnaissance the disaster focus points were checked and the hazard of each was evaluated. Table 2.3.8 indicates the disaster focus points for landslide hazard evaluation.

Most active landslides are characterized by certain landslide landforms. The site reconnaissance is carried out to check the landslide micro landforms. Another purpose is to find out what kind of landslide countermeasures have been undertaken and damage to houses that has occurred.

Table 2.3.8 The Disaster Focus Points for Landslide Hazard Evaluation (source: JET)

Category Check points

Phenomenon on the Site

Scarp (Main or Minor, Horse shoe shape) Transverse Cracks (Tension or Compression) Pond, Swamp Spring Water Topography of Steps Embankment at upper part Cut Slope at the toe Wash out by river Damage to buildings, houses Monitoring Equipment

History Existing record of Landslide (documents or oral communication)

Countermeasure No Existing Countermeasures Effectiveness of Countermeasure

Figure 2.3.2 Schematic Diagram of Landslide Landforms (source: JET)

c. Result of Site Reconnaissance

The results of the site reconnaissance are recorded in a landslide recording sheet, including

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-13

the disaster focus point, its location, scale, on-site photographs, and description of the site.

Landslide recording sheet consists of general information sheet, evaluation sheet, and photograph sheet. The contents of each sheet are as follows;

General information sheet: In the general information sheet the address, position coordinate, schematic sketch, and location map (Scale: 1:25,000) are recorded.

Evaluation sheet: In the evaluation sheet the disaster focus points and a description of a site are recorded.

Photo sheet: In the photo sheet photographs such as the damage situation and the landslide landforms are recorded.

The landslide recording sheet of 37 areas is attached at the end of the report, and Figure 2.3.3 - Figure 2.3.5 are examples of the landslide recording sheet.

In addition, Table 2.3.9 indicates an item and the score of the landslide hazard evaluation by the site reconnaissance. The landslide hazard evaluation by site reconnaissance found three areas with high scores (6 points in total), Chitrakoot area, Vallee Pitot area, and Quatre Soeurs area (Table 2.3.10).

Table 2.3.9 Description of Scoring Sheet for Evaluating Landslide Hazard (source: JET)

Category Score Description

Phe

nom

enon

on

the

Site

Landslide landforms and characteristics

Obvious 2 Definite landslide Slight 1 Undefined landslide, or slope failure None 0 Not a landslide

Damage to buildings, houses

Obvious 2 Heavy damage, situation is urgent Slight 1 Light damage, not urgent None 0 No damage

His

tory

Existing record of Landslide

(documents or oral record)

Obvious 2 Definite document and oral record exists Slight 1 Undefined document and oral record existsNone 0 No existing record

Table 2.3.10 Result of Landslide Hazard Evaluation (source: JET)

No. Area name

Kind of the disaster Score of landslide hazard evaluation

General classification

Sub classification

Landslide landforms

and characteristic

Damage to buildings, houses

Existing record of landslides

Total

9 Chitrakoot, Vallee des Pretres

Slope Landslide 2 2 2 6

10 Vallee Pitot (near Eidgah)

Slope Landslide 2 2 2 6

13 Mgr. Leen Street and nearby vicinity, La Butte

Slope Landslide 2 1 2 5

15 Old Moka Road, Camp Chapelon

Slope Landslide 2 1 0 3

27 Quatre Soeurs, Slope Landslide 2 2 2 6 34 Candos Hill Slope Landslide 2 1 0 3

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-14

Figure 2.3.3 Example of the Landslide Recording Sheet, Chitrakoot Area (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-15

Figure 2.3.4 Example of the Landslide Recording Sheet, Vallee Pitot Area (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-16

Figure 2.3.5 Example of the Landslide Recording Sheet, Quatre Soeurs (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-17

2.3.3 Inventory and Location Map

As a result of site reconnaissance, the characteristics and evaluation of the landslides were compiled and made into a landslide inventory (Table 2.3.11) and a landslide location map (Figure 2.3.6).

Figure 2.3.6 Landslide Location Map (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-18

Table 2.3.11 Landslide Inventory (source: JET)

(1):Landslide landforms and characteristic, (2):Damage on construction and houses, (3):Existing record of Landslide

no. Area name Summary of the field investigation and interview

Kind of the disaster Score of landslide hazard evaluation

General classification

Sub classification

(1) (2) (3) Total

1 Temple Road, Creve Coeur

Deformation on the concrete block wall and house caused by embankment deformation at the front yard (parking area) was confirmed. Another problem was inadequate surface drainage causing surface water from mountains to flow directly at houses during heavy rain.

Other Damage of wall － － － －

2 Congomah Village Council (Ramlakhan)

A small stream flows under the road through a concrete pipe culvert, however, because it is too small it causes flooding and bank erosion during heavy rain.

Other Stream erosion － － － －

3 Congomah Village Council (Leekraj)

A 1m high retaining wall that was constructed to build the road was reported to be leaning but it was found to be stable and no slope failure was observed.

Other Damage of wall － － － －

4 Congomah Village Council (Frederick)

The 1m high retaining wall along the road was found to have collapsed due to erosion by surface water flow during rainy season.

Other Damage of wall － － － －

5 Congomah Village Council (Blackburn Lanes)

A slope failure was confirmed on the side of the road. Other Damage of

Embankment － － － －

6 Les Mariannes Community Centre (Road area)

There are a few slope failures and a lanslide in this site. The slope at the roadside collapsed during heavy rain in 2010 and a section of road was washed away. Since then, a retaining wall has been constructed and the site is currently stable.

Slope Slope failure － － － －

7 Les Mariannes Community Centre (Resident area)

There appeared to be bank erosion on the left bank above the bridge. Other Stream

erosion － － － －

8 L'Eau Bouillie

The cracks have been spotted on the road surface due to the deterioration of bearing capacity of the roadbed. However, the cracks have been repaired.

Other Damage of Embankment － － － －

9 Chitrakoot, Vallee des Pretres

A clear landslide was confirmed. A landslide was reported to have damaged houses and a school after heavy rain in 2005. Drilling investigation and monitoring have been carried out, but not sufficiently. No countermeasures have been implemented. Therefore, a detailed investigation and monitoring are necessary while the countermeasures are expected in future.

Slope Landslide 2 2 2 6

10 Vallee Pitot (near Eidgah)

Lately, housing developments are growing rapidly in this area. A landslide boundary of 35m x 20m was clearly detected. Several houses have been damaged and some cracks were observed. The situation of the damage was also reported in the newspaper.

Slope Landslide 2 2 2 6

11 LePouce Street

Insufficient surface drainage means rain water concentrates in low area and erodes roads and houses in its path. Damage is negligible at present, although the maintenance of the surface drainage will be necessary.

Other Stream erosion － － － －

12 Justice Street (near Kalimata Mandir)

An embankment has been constructed to build up the road, which caused an adjacent retaining wall to be pushed out and deformed. Insufficient surface drainage causing accumulation of groundwater could also be a factor causing this deformation.

Other Damage of wall － － － －

13 Mgr. Leen Street and nearby vicinity, La Butte

The landslide of La Butte occurred in 1986, and many houses and a school were damaged. As for this landslide, countermeasures were carried out in 1998, therefore further investigation of the landslide is unnecessary. However, Port Louis City wants to continue the monitoring on this landslide in the future.

Slope Landslide 2 1 2 5

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-19

14 Pouce Stream

Every side of the channel is covered by concrete. The water level rises until the upper edge of the channel and erode beyond this point in the rainy season. The gabion has been set up at the lower part of slope at the channel and no damage has been reported yet. However, the deteriotion of the concrete wall is remarkable and the extention of the wall height will be necessary. Therefore, further investigation and countermeasures are advisable.

Other Stream erosion － － － －

15 Old Moka Road, Camp Chapelon

The landslide topography is not clear, but five houses and two retaining walls were damaged while the spring water was spotted in two places. There are two possible causes of this, creep transformation of weak surface soil or a shallow landslide. Therefore, landslide investigation and monitoring are necessary while the countermeasures are expected in future.

Slope Landslide 2 1 0 3

16 Boulevard Victria, Montague Coupe

The gabion was installed on the cut-slope when the road was constructed. There is no record of damage for this site but the angle of the wall is steep.Therefore, the observation of this wall is advisable.

Other Damage of wall － － － －

17

Pailles : (i) access road to Les Guibies and along motorway, near flyover bridge

The slope failure has been spotted along the cut-slope (5m height) at the roadside of highway. The surface of the cut-slope has been weathered, and it is eroded by rain.

Slope Slope failure － － － －

18

Pailles : (ii) access road Morcellement des Aloes from Avenue M.Leal (on hillside)

Insufficient drainage is causing erosion at the base of the water tank. Immediate remedial work is needed.

Other Stream erosion － － － －

19 Pailles : (iii) soreze regin

Falling rocks at the upper slope and shallow slope failure at the middle and lower slope occurred in an area of housing. There is only slight damage for now, although shallow slope failure and cracks have been confirmed.

Slope Slope failure － － － －

20 Plaine Champagne Road, opposite "Musee Touche Dubois"

Retaining walls have been constructed as countermeasures where the slope failure has been confirmed. It is currently stable, although there were a few cracks spotted in the retaining walls which are believed to be due to substandard construction.

Slope Slope failure － － － －

21 Chamarel : (i) near Reataurant Le Chamarel

Cracks in the road shoulder have occurred due to a lack of bearing capacity . It is caused by insufficient soil compaction.

Other Damage of Embankment － － － －

22 Chamarel : (ii) Roadside

Deformation of the road has been confirmed at the shoulder of the road due to a lack of bearing capacity. The embankment of stone masonry wall and retaining wall were constructed but it is insufficient.

Other Damage of Embankment － － － －

23 Gremde Riviere Noire Village Hall

The crack at the base of village hall area and edge of concrete basketball court has been confirmed. However, the surrounding structures are not affected, therefore it is considered unlikely this damaged was caused by landslides. Rather it is likely to be caused by lack of bearing capacity of the ground or a problem with the structure itself.

Other Damage of house － － － －

24 Baie du Cap : (i) Near St Francois d'Assise Church

A debris flow has occurred in the past and a block wall has since been constructed. Also, small surface failures have been observed frequently in this area.

Slope Debris flow － － － －

25 Baie du Cap :(ii) Maconde Region

A new road was built to reduce the damage from rock falls. However, rock falls and small rock failures are also a frequent occurance along the new road. The rocks are weathered, and there is a high possibility of rock fall in future.

Slope Rock fall － － － －

26 Riviere des Anguilles, near the bridge

There are many houses built on the cliff here. The cliff is weathered severly and stream erosion occurs frequently. Therefore, the house will need to be relocated.

Other Stream erosion － － － －

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-20

27 Quatre Soeurs, Marie Jeanne, Jhummah Streert, Old Grand Port

Landslide activity has been confirmed at the Quatre Soeurs area where many houses have been damaged. The groundwater level at the lower part of the landslide is high and is causing instability in the landslide. Drilling investigation and monitoring have been carried out, but not sufficiently. Further investigation and monitoring are necessary while the countermeasures are expected in future.

Slope Landslide 2 2 2 6

28

Bambous Virieux, Rajiv Gandhi Street (near Bhavauy House), Impasse Bholoa

Slope failure was confirmed at the backyard of the house. No damge on the house was reported although the soil of the slope approached near the house. A retaining wall has been constructed independently.

Slope Slope failure － － － －

29 Cave in at Union Park, Rose Belle

A cavity (4m x 4m x 3m depth) due to land subsidence was observed in the residential area. No damage was caused to the houses and the cavity was filled in with soil. Similar situation was confirmed nearby.

Other cavern － － － －

30 Trou-AUX-Cerfs

The slope failure in the crater of the volcano occurred during heavy rainfall in 2005. The possibility of slope failure on the rear side is low. However, the slope failure on both sides can be expected.

Slope Slope failure － － － －

31 River Bank at Cite L'Oiseau

Bank erosion and flooding is common in the rainy season when the river water level rises. There are more damage on the left side of the riverbank due to the strong collision of water. However, past damage has been restored by constructing a retaining wall.

Other Stream erosion － － － －

32 Louis de Rochecouste (Riviere Seche)

The bank erosion and flood are common in the rainy season. The base of the houses have been eroded and the retaining wall of the houses are inclined.

Other Stream erosion － － － －

33 Piper Morcellement Piat

The bank erosion and flood are remarkable in the rainy season. However, the past damage has been restored by constructing the retaining wall.

Other Stream erosion － － － －

34

Candos Hill at LallBahadoor Shastri and Mahatma Gandhi Avenues

A clear landslide site was confirmed at the backyard of the house. The landslide topography and slope are clear while the spring water has been observed. The scale of this lanslide is small (40m x 35m) and no house on the lanslide area. Only slight crack has been confirmed on the retaining wall.

Slope Landslide 2 1 0 3

35 Cavernous Area at Mgr Leen Avenue and Bassin

A cavity was reported during the house construction but it was filled with concrete. There is no further danger at this site.

Other cavern － － － －

36 Morcellement Hermitage, Coromandel

At this slope, slope failure occurred in 2010, and a road was destroyed. After a retaining wall was made as a countermeasure, large-scale slope failures have not been found. However, the stone blocks from on top of the retaining wall have fallen down. This is likely caused by the ground behind the retaining wall sinking due to lack of compaction of the backfilling soil.

Slope Slope failure － － － －

37 Montee S, GRNW Weathered outcrops were detected on both sides of the bank. The erosion is remarkable in the rainy season.

Other Stream erosion － － － －

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-21

2.3.4 GIS Database

As a result of landslide survey, it turned out that long-term maintenance and control of spatial information of topography and geographical features and all kinds of information obtained by works such as survey, plan and design are requested in a series of operations like countermeasure plan and construction.

So GIS (Geographic Information System) is thought to be the best system for maintenance and control of these information.

In this project, GIS database is created by using ArcGIS because it is in heavy usage in related other project (ex. Development of a DDR Strategic Framework and action Plan) and in Mauritius and ArcGIS software is compatible with other GIS softwares such as MapInfo, AutoCAD, Quantum GIS, etc.

In addition, on coordinate system of map information, it was decided that following system was used.

Coordinate System： Projection Universal Transverse Mercator

UTM40S zone

Geographic Coordinate System GCS_WGS_1984

Next, Use of GIS data created by field survey, existing GIS data and Excel data/reports to create a new GIS data is shown in Figure 2.3.7.

Figure 2.3.7 Flow to Create A Database Using the ArcGIS (source: JET)

Use existing GIS data to create a GIS

database of the target

Existing (same) GIS Data

New GIS data from field survey

Excel/Book, Reports

Analysis/Edit

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-22

a. Graphic Information

Graphic information can be classified into following two types.

Table 2.3.12 Existing GIS Data Collected in Mauritius (source: JET)

No Thematic Map Data style Data type Source

1 Topographic Map(1:25,000)、Aerial

photo、Satellite Image(:0.15Pixcel) Raster Tiff/Jpeg

MoESD

MHL2 Roads, River, contour line Vector Line MoESD

3 Geology, National Boundary,

Province Boundary Vector Polygon MoESD

Table 2.3.13 New GIS Data Obtained from Field Surveys, etc. (source: JET)

No Thematic Map Data style Data type Source

1 Landslide Location Map Vector Point The data were

made by this

project

3 Landslide distribution Map Vector Polygon

b. Attribute Data

Attribute information is written in the DBF file form of characters, numeric and quantities as information related to graphic information. In a single administrative field attribute information such as the name and population has been entered, for example. And in geological map, geology name, geology code, large classification name, code and small classification name, code are entered as attribute information. Other than these, a number of individual information is added as attribute information. By using these attribute information, data search function or graphic display function or change of display color, thickness, and size are available.

Next, links of graphic information and attribute information by using political boundary data are explained in Figure 2.3.8. On the right side of Figure, political boundary map consists of small administrative boundaries is shown. Many small areas can be seen in map information and area information (Name, Latitude, Longitude, and Area) is entered in each area as attribute data. This attribute data is shown on the left side of Figure. It is possible to control map information from an item in attribute data and also to search for attributes data and political boundary map data to each other. In this sample, if click on No3 in the attribute data, color of one area of political boundary map changes. This is an example of search and display of No3 position in the map.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-23

Figure 2.3.8 Sample of Link of Political Boundary Map and Attribute Data (source: JET)

c. Various Functions

Using a database, it is possible to create and view the inventory recording sheet and landslides recording sheet by utilizing functions of GIS software. Other functions of GIS software are as follows;

・View of landslide recording sheet

・View of landslide location

・Landslide distribution map

・Landslide distribution map at pilot site

・Landslide locations in the range of the number of specific

・The area of the landslide block in specific range

・GIS data converting to CAD files

・Editing tasks, such as revision and update of the database

d. Creation of a New Thematic Map

By combining following three information (field survey information, existing information and new created information), new thematic mapping is possible. Landslide location diagram and landslide distribution map are included under this new thematic map. The following is an example of new thematic map that can be utilized to manage landslide survey from information had been obtained so far.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-24

Figure 2.3.9 Landslide Survey location Map

(Base Map: Topographic

Map(1:25,000))(source: JET)

Figure 2.3.10 Landslide Survey location Map

(Base Map: Roads, River, contour line,

Province Boundary)(source: JET)

Figure 2.3.11 Landslide Distribution Map,

Chitrakoot Area (source: JET)

Figure 2.3.12 Landslide Distribution Map,

Quatre Soeurs Area (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-25

2.4 Existing Countermeasures

Information will be collected for structural and non-structural measures required for landslide management planning as described below.

Table 2.4.1 Survey on Structural/Non-structural Measures (source: JET)

Item Survey Method Existing landslide countermeasures

Study of design documents and interviews with related parties on past countermeasures, their locations, effects and problems

Landslide monitoring, warning threshold, communication means, evacuation support

Interviews with related parties on the types, numbers and specifications of existing monitoring devices, measurement methods, systems and methods of analysis. In addition, threshold for giving and transmitting warning and evacuation support systems will be clarified.

Residents’ awareness and relocation

Past damage, and residents’ recognition of warnings, of landslide precursors, and of hazard and evacuation areas were surveyed to understand their awareness of slope disasters. Detailed information on the relocation of residents such as background information and problems will also be collected.

Land use restrictions in hazard areas

Documents/drawings on land/structure use, landslide legislation, development regulations, upper level/related plans will be collected and interviews with relevant institutions will be held as necessary.

2.4.1 Structural Countermeasures

The Survey of structural countermeasures was carried out by studying design documents and interviewing related parties on past countermeasures, their locations, effects and problems.

The only landslide for which structural countermeasures have been carried out is that in La Butte area (Table2.4.2). The landslide of La Butte occurred in 1986, and many houses and a school were damaged. Countermeasures were undertaken in 1998 by help of Japan (Figure 2.4.1), and it has been stable since. However, Port Louis City wants to continue the monitoring on this landslide in the future.

Table 2.4.2 The Structural Countermeasures of Landslide Hazard Area (6 Areas) (source: JET)

Manage -ment no.

Area name Kind of the

disaster Structural countermeasures

9 Chitrakoot, Vallee des Pretres Landslide Non 10 Vallee Pitot (near Eidgah) Landslide Non

13 Mgr. Leen Street and nearby vicinity, La Butte

LandslidePile works: 6 lines Drainage wells: 4 wells horizontal drain works: 42 pipes

15 Old Moka Road, Camp Chapelon Landslide Non

27 Quatre Soeurs, Marie Jeanne, Jhummah Streert, Old Grand Port

Landslide Non

34 Candos Hill at LallBahadoor Shastri and Mahatma Gandhi Avenues

Landslide Non

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-26

Document GOVERNMENT OF MAURITIUS LANDSLIDE COUNTERMEASURES PLAN AND INVESTIGATION IN PORT LOUIS, FINAL REPORT, ABSTRACT: JICA, 1990

Project GOVERNMENT OF MAURITIUS LANDSLIDE PROTECTION PROJECT IN PORT LOUIS: JICA

Number of structural measures

Pile works: 6 lines, Drainage wells: 4 wells, horizontal drain works: 42 pipes

Figure 2.4.1 The Landslide Structural Countermeasures in La Butte Area6

2.4.2 Non-Structural Countermeasures

Existing non-structural countermeasures such as landslide monitoring equipment, warning standards, information communication methods, evacuation support, awareness of residents and land use restrictions were investigated as part of a survey of landslide hazard areas,

Horizontal drain WorkDrainage well

CONSTRUCTION SITE FOR LONG

TERM PROTECTION MEASURS

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-27

which are listed in the Cyclone and Other Natural Disasters Scheme.

Landslide monitoring equipment was confirmed in Chitrakoot, Quatre Soeurs and La Butte. The following table shows the contents of monitoring equipment and their condition.

Table 2.4.3 Current Condition of Landslide Monitoring in Mauritius (source: JET)

District Contents of Landslide MonitoringChitrakoot Three extensometers were confirmed to exist. Two of them are working. The data is

measured by a Mauritian construction company. Quatre Soeurs

Six boreholes for groundwater monitoring were confirmed to exist. These were installed in March 2011, and were used for monitoring until May 2011. It is able to use those boreholes, but the monitoring has not been implemented.7

La Butte Sixteen extensometers were installed and had been used for monitoring, but the monitoring and maintenance have not been implemented from 2011. Two of sixteen extensometers, three of seven tiltmeters and two of ten groundwater piezometers are functional.8

The survey for making landslide inventory by this project could not confirm any original warning standards, communication methods or evacuation assistance in the landslide hazard areas selected by the Cyclone and Other Natural Disasters Scheme.

Details of warning systems, communication methods and evacuation assistance at the national level are covered in the section of The Landslide Emergency Scheme in the Cyclone and Other Natural Disasters Scheme. These are reported in this report’s Chapter 5.3 Early Warning and Evacuation. And awareness of residents and land use restrictions of high-risk areas are also reported in chapters 2.5 Social Survey and 3.10 Review and recommendation for the Planning Policy Guidance.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-28

2.5 Social Survey

2.5.1 Basic Information Survey

This survey was implemented to collect the basic information for the review of the PPG, IEC (Information Education Communication) activities (such as enhancement of awareness of the disaster mitigation and evacuation drill/exercises), the feasibility study and the pilot project. The data collection results are shown as below.

a. Land Use

Figure 2.5.1 shows the land use map of Mauritius. Table 2.5.1 shows land use changes per category in Mauritius during the period 1986 to 2010.

Figure 2.5.1 Land Use Map9

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-29

Over the last 25 years (1986 to 2010), changes within each land use category have ranged from slight to extensive. About 14% of agricultural land (excluding abandoned sugar cane land), and 5% of forest, shrub, range and grazing land, have been lost. On the other hand, built-up areas have increased by 12% and road infrastructure by 127%. However, the horizontal sprawl of built-up areas has been less obvious, due to the tendency to build vertically as compared to the horizontal expansion of the road network. Enlarging and upgrading of existing roads such as the conversion of highway to dual carriageway and the addition of new roads have also been important during this period of 1986 to 2010.

Expansion has been at the expense of agriculture. Loss of agricultural lands concerned mainly sugar cane lands, which were for instance released for property development and other housing projects. In addition, some agricultural land had been acquired for road development projects.

Table 2.5.1 Land Use Changes as Per Category in Mauritius During the Period 1986 to 20109

Land use category Area (ha) Change

[%] 1986 2010 Difference Agriculture (sugar cane and other) 90,000 77,418 -12,582 -14Abandoned sugar cane lands n/a 1,468 1,468 n/aForest, shrub, and grazing land 65,400 68,946 3,546 5Built-up area 25,000 28,070 3,070 12Infrastructure (roads, footpaths) 3,465 7,879 4,414 127Inland water resource system 2,610 2,719 109 4Total 186,475 186,500

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-30

b. Distribution of the Population

Figure 2.5.2 shows the population distribution map. In Mauritius, all the towns starting from the capital city of Port Louis to the town of Curepipe, are situated along a corridor/main motorway. All these urban areas have many services and amenities ranging from government offices to libraries. As can be seen from the map, the rest of the settlements consist of villages. Some are big with a population of 10,000 to 30,000. These big rural areas are fast developing into dynamic economic centres, e.g. Flacq, Mahébourg and Goodlands.

Pereybère Pointe auxRoches

GrandGaube

RochesNoires

Belair

PetitSable

VieuxGrandPort

VilleNoire

Savannah

Baie dela GrandeRiviere Noire

Tamarin

Pointe auxSables

MonChoisy

Floreal

GrandBois

CheminGrenier

Rivière duRempart

Moka

BonAccueil

Centrede Flacq

Goodlands

Triolet

Vacoas

Phoenix

RoseBelle

GrandBaie

Poste deFlacq

Troud'EauDouce

Mahebourg

Souillac

Flic enFlac

PORTLOUIS

Pamplemousses

Curepipe

QuatreBornes

RoseHill

BeauBassin

57°30'0"E

57°30'0"E

20°0

'0"

S

20°0

'0"

S

20°3

0'0"

S

20°3

0'0"

S

540000

540000

550000

550000

560000

560000

570000

570000

580000

580000

773

000

0

773

000

0

77

400

00

77

400

00

775

00

00

775

00

00

776

00

00

776

00

00

777

000

0

777

000

0

77

800

00

77

800

00

779

00

00

779

00

00

780

00

00

780

00

00

RoadsMotorway

Population- 3000

3000 - 6000

6000 - 12000

12000 - 24000

24000 -

´

0 5 102.5km

Figure 2.5.2 Population Distribution Map10

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-31

c. Distribution of Poverty

Figure 2.5.3 shows the poverty distribution map by the Central Statistical Office of Mauritius. A poverty distribution map is a spatial representation of poverty indicators at disaggregated geographical regions. It gives an overview of the disparities that exist in poverty level within a country. The maps depict the poverty rate in each of the administrative regions.

Survey result of 2001-2002 Survey result of 2006 - 2007

Figure 2.5.3 Poverty Distribution Map11

A comparative analysis of the poverty rates for 2001/02 and 2006/07 indicates that:

・ Among the 5 Municipal Wards with the lowest poverty rates in 2001/02, 4 remained in the same position in 2006/07. These are Wards 1 & 2 of Quatre Bornes, Ward 4 of Beau Bassin / Rose Hill and Ward 3 of Vacoas-Phoenix. However, Ward 1 of Vacoas-Phoenix which ranked 4th in 2001/02 (poverty rate of 2.6%) dropped to rank 18 in 2006/07 (poverty rate of 4.7%).

・ There were 48 Municipal Village Council Areas where poverty was not highly prevalent (with a rate below 5%) in 2001/02. In 2006/07 the number decreased to 20. In 2001/02 there were 4 Municipal Village Council Areas with high poverty rate (above 15%). In 2006/07, the number increased to 15.

・ Out of the 145 Municipal Village Council Areas, 26 areas, located mostly in the district of Rivière du Rempart, witnessed major improvements in their poverty rank (rank difference of 20 or more between 2001/02 & 2006/07). On the other hand, 24 Municipal Village Council Areas located mostly in the eastern and southern part, witnessed a major deterioration in their poverty rank.

Proportion of poor persons [%] ■15-35 ■10-15 ■5-10 ■0-5

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-32

d. Water Resources

Figure 2.5.4 shows the distribution map of principal water resources in Mauritius. In Mauritius, water is obtained from springs, reservoirs, rivers and boreholes. There is an increasing demand for water for domestic, agricultural and industrial uses. It is obtained of domestic water supply from reservoirs built on the Central Plateau. As can be seen from the map, boreholes situated mostly on the western part of the Central Plateau and the Northern Plains provide us with domestic water supply. Some rivers have been dammed to provide water for domestic use. The reservoirs of La Ferme and La Nicoliere and part of the Midlands Dam are used for irrigating agricultural land.

Figure 2.5.4 Distribution Map of Principal Water Resources in Mauritius12

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-33

The whole population of Mauritius has access to piped potable water. The Housing and Population Census 2000 survey reveals that 98.7% of the population had access to piped potable water within their premises, with 85.5% having piped water inside their house as compared to 75% in 1990. The remaining 1.3% of the population relied on public fountains, CWA (Central Water Authority) mobile tanker service and other sources for their daily supply of potable water. The CWA estimates that the average demands for potable water from households is 170 L/h/d and non-domestic demand is equivalent to 441 L/h/d. Water is used for different purposes as shown in Table 2.5.2.

Table 2.5.2 Water Utilization13

Purpose Surface Water

Groundwater Total River-run Off-takes Storage

Domestic, Industrial and Tourism

38 48 113 199

Industrial (private boreholes) - - 10 10Agricultural 370 76 22 468Hydropower 131 174 - 305Overall Utilization 539 298 145 982

(Unit: million cubic meter per year)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-34

2.5.2 Attitude Survey about Landslide Disasters

The attitude survey was implemented to collect the basic information for the review of the PPG and IEC (Information Education Communication) activities (such as enhancement of awareness of the disaster mitigation and evacuation drill/exercises). The following table shows the summary of the survey.

Table 2.5.3 Summary of Attitude Survey about Landslide Disasters (source:JET)

Item Content Period From beginning of August to middle of September Respondent

/ Number of responses

Whole of Mauritius: about 300 households

Schedule <Middle of July> ・ Arrangement and meeting with related ministries to obtain cooperation, gathering the survey staff. ・ MPI: consultation about the contents/logistics of the survey, arrangement with the related ministries and agencies ・ MHL: consultation about the contents/logistics of the survey ・ MLG (Ministry of Local Government & Outer Islands): arrangement with the local authorities ・ CSO (The Central Statistics Office): consultation about the contents/logistics of the survey ・ Local Authorities: Arrangement for the survey, consultation about the logistics of the survey

< End of July > ・ Explanatory meeting for the interviewer ・ Discussion with MPI, MHL and Local Authorities regarding the survey contents during the workshop of the land use policy for landslide disaster management

< From beginning of August to middle of September > ・ Explanatory meeting for the interviewer ・ Implementation of the survey

Method Interview to the respondent by interviewer (face to face) Remarks *1: Survey sheets were eliminated that: had most questions left

unanswered, had inconsistent answers, or had other problems *2: In the simple tabulation work, effort was made to collect opinions as

much as possible. Therefore, the total number of responses to each question might be less than the total number of the respondents

*3: The survey was publicized to the residents, councilors, police, mass media through MLG and Local Authorities before the start of the survey

< About the setting the respondents >

A representative sample of respondents was selected impartially from the nine local authorities.

Social workers who know the existing situation of their own region and are aware of the local residents were recommended as respondents by MPI, MHL, MLG and Local Authorities. Social workers are not affected by politics, religion and ethnic group, and can tell residents’ opinions to the Local Authorities. Based on the above, the survey tried to find social workers as respondents, but when it was difficult to find them, a randomly selected resident was set as a respondent.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-35

The following table shows the items and content of the survey sheet.

Table 2.5.4 Items and Content of the Survey Sheet (source: JET)

Item Content

Basic Information Age, Sex, Length of residence, Land ownership of the residence, House ownership

Awareness about landslide disaster and experience

Recognition about landslide, Experience of landslide damage, Worry of landslide damage

Recognition about the early warning system

Recognition of the warning system of Mauritius, Needs of the warning system, Necessary information for warning system

Recognition about the development/building restrictions

Recognition of the existing development/building restrictions, Recognition of development restriction in slope area.

Establishment of the landslide caution zone

Establishment of the landslide caution zone, Need of explanation about the landslide caution zone by government.

Hazard map Needs of publicity of the hazard map

Restriction in the landslide caution zone

Needs of development/building restriction, Needs of advice for building by Local Authority, Needs of relocation, Assistance for relocation by government, Motivation for relocation

Evacuation exercise

Evacuation action in landslide occurrence, Participation experience of evacuation drill/exercise, Intentions to join evacuation drill/exercise, Motivation for participation in evacuation drill/exercise

Free comment Free comment for landslide disaster

The following simple tabulation results are reported in this report because of space constraints. The detailed result of each question is shown in the Supporting Report.

(a) Summary of simple tabulation results of all respondents (b) Comparison of simple tabulation results of the 3 pilot sites (Chitrakoot, Quatre Soeurs,

Vallée Pitot)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-36

a. Summary of Simple Tabulation Results of All Respondents

Main points obtained by the simple tabulation are shown in the following table as a summary of simple tabulation results.

Table 2.5.5 Summary of Simple Tabulation Results of All Respondents (source:JET)

Item Content

Basic Information

・ Impartial responses were obtained from whole Mauritius. ・ Impartial responses were obtained from each age and sex. ・ Length of residence: 30% were 11-30 years and 31-50

years ・ Land ownership of the residents: Over 85% of respondents

own land and house

Awareness about landslide disaster and experience

・ Recognition of landslide: 70% of respondents knew of landslides

・ Method of information acquisition about landslides: main responses were TV, radio, newspaper, word of mouth

Recognition about the early warning system

・ About 60% of respondents do not know about the existing early warning system.

・ Needs of warning system: 97% of respondents need the warning system

・ Necessary information for warning system: Evacuation sites, Hazardous spot around your residence, Timing of evacuation, Evacuation route

Recognition about the development/building restrictions

・ 86% of respondents know the existing development/building restrictions

・ Method of information acquisition about restrictions: Word of mouth, TV, radio, newspaper

・ Recognition of development restriction in slope area: About 75% of respondents know the restrictions.

Establishment of the landslide caution zone

・ About 97％ of respondents agree to the establishment of the landslide caution zone

Hazard map ・ About 97% of respondents agree to publicity of hazard map

Restriction in the landslide caution zone

・ Needs of development/building restriction and advice for building by Local Authority: About 95％ of respondents agree to the restriction and regulation

・ Relocation from the caution zone to safe area: About 90% of respondents agree to the relocation.

・ Assistance for relocation by government: Main responses were financial assistance, to secure alternative land and to secure alternative house

Evacuation exercise

・ Evacuation action in landslide occurrence: Main responses were to report the situation to the Authority, evacuate voluntarily, evacuate with family/neighbors at recommendation of Authority

・ About 90% of respondents are aware of participation to the evacuation drill/exercise

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-37

b. Comparison of Simple Tabulation Result of the 3 Pilot Sites (Chitrakoot, Quatre Soeurs, Vallée Pitot)

The following table shows the summary of simple tabulation results of questions about development restrictions and relocation.

The respondents at all pilot sites approve of the development restrictions and relocation. The three districts are positive regarding development restrictions and relocation, but different levels of positive awareness about the development restrictions and relocation are confirmed as shown in the following table.

Table 2.5.6 Comparison of Awareness in the Three Pilot Sites (source:JET)

Development restrictions Relocation

Chitrakoot ・ The majority have opinion of

“Agree” ・ The majority have opinion of

“Agree”/“Strongly agree” with or without assistance by government

Quatre Soeurs

・ The majority have opinion of “Strongly Agree”

・ The majority have opinion of “Strongly agree” with or without assistance by government

Vallée Pitot

・ Generally “Agree” ・ The residents have the lowest

percentage of “Strongly Agree” of the three pilot sites

・ Generally “Agree” ・ 10-20% residents have opinion of

“Disagree”/“Strongly Disagree” ・ The percentage of “Agree”/ “Strongly

Agree” is increased by government assistance

・ The residents have the lowest percentage of “Strongly Agree” of the three pilot sites

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-38

2.6 Organizations and Systems

2.6.1 Organizational and Institutional Formation

The Government of Mauritius designates the responsibilities of the natural disaster management to the several ministries and organizations. In terms of landslide disaster management, seven ministries and 11 organizations share the roles and responsibilities according to the ‘National Disasters Scheme 2014’.

a. Main Authorities of the Disaster Management

The Cyclone and Other Natural Disasters Committee, which is composed of 21 ministries, nine local authorities and 14 public-private organizations, had functioned as the main body of the general disaster management for over thirty years14. However, it was replaced by a National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council in October 2013. According to the National Disasters Scheme 2014, the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council is responsible for coordination of all stakeholders in order to implement the disaster risk reduction policies and strategies, and to promote effective disaster risk management. Together with the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council, a National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Centre (NDRRMC) has been set up under the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) to develop a disaster risk reduction strategy and plan at all levels. While the NDRRMC is a permanent body, an Emergency Operations Command (EOC) will be activated under the NDRRMC when a serious disaster occurs. A Crisis Committee will also be operated depending on the magnitude and severity of the disaster and will supervise the disaster response operations, decide the disaster response measures and issue evacuation orders. In addition, Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Centres (LDRRMC) have been established to coordinate all disaster risk reduction and management activities in their respective areas as well as to conduct an annual simulation exercise for tsunami/high waves, torrential rain and landslides15. (Table 2.6.1)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-39

Table 2.6.1 Main Authorities of Disaster Management (source: JET)

Organization Type and members General missions for disaster management

National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (Council)

Permanent The Council consists of: - The Secretary to Cabinet and Head of the Civil Service - The Financial Secretary; - The Supervising Officer of the Prime Minister’s Office; - The Commissioner of Police; - The Supervising Officer of the Ministry responsible for the subject of public utilities;- The Supervising Officer of the Ministry responsible for the subject of Environment; - The Supervising Officer of the Ministry responsible for the subject of local

government; - The Supervising Officer of the Ministry responsible for the subject of public

infrastructure; - The Supervising Officer of the Ministry responsible for the subject of social security;- The Supervising Officer of the Ministry responsible for the subject of social welfare

centres; - The Island Chief Executive, Rodrigues; - The General Manager, Outer Islands Development Corporation; - The Chief Fire Officer, Mauritius Fire and Rescue Service; - The Director, Mauritius Meteorological Services; - A representative of the Mauritius Employers’ Federation; - A representative of the Joint Economic Council; - A representative of the Mauritius Red Cross Society; and - 2 representatives from other non-governmental organisations, to be appointed by

the Minister.

Replacing the responsibilities of the CONDC in October 2013

The Council is responsible for coordinating the implementation of:- (1) The National Risk Reduction and

Management Policy approved by the Minister.

(2) The National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Strategic Framework and Plan developed by the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Centre (NRDDMC);

Promoting safety and resilience at all levels by utilizing knowledge, innovation and education; and

Coordinating the implementation of the obligations of the State of Mauritius under disaster management treaties.

Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) National Disaster Risk

Reduction and Management Centre (NDRRMC)

Permanent Planning, organizing, coordinating and monitoring of disaster risk reduction and management activities at all levels

Developing a disaster risk reduction and management strategy

Emergency Operation Command (EOC

Occasional The EOC consists of the representatives from the following organisations: - Ministries/Departments; - Other emergency services; - NGOs - Private sector companies

Being responsible for coordination during the preparedness, response and recovery phases of any disaster;

Crisis Committee Occasional (depending on the magnitude and severity of a disaster) The Crisis Committee consists of:

Supervising the organisations which undertake disaster response

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-40

- The Secretary to Cabinet and Head of the Civil Service, who shall be the chairperson;

- The Commissioner of Police - The Director-General of the NDRRMC; and - Such other person as the chairperson of the Crisis Committee may determine.

operations; Taking appropriate measures in order

to provide effective relief assistance; and

Issuing evacuation order. Government Information

Service (GIS) Permanent Being a communications hub of the

Government; Disseminating accurate information in a

timely manner, with a view to stimulate public support;

Providing information to the government in order to facilitate decision making; and

Acting as the interface between the government and the local/international media.

Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Committee (LDRRMC)

Permanent The LDRRMC consists of: - The Lord Mayor of a Municipal City Council, Mayor of a Municipal Town Council or

Chairperson of a District Council; - A representative of the Ministry responsible for the subject of public infrastructure; - A representative of the Ministry responsible for the subject of social security; - A representative of the Ministry responsible for the subject of environment and

sustainable development; - A representative of the Ministry responsible for the subject of education; - A representative of the Ministry responsible for the subject of local government; - A representative of the Ministry responsible for the subject of social welfare

centres; - A representative of the Mauritius Meteorological Services; - A representative of the Mauritius Police Force; - A representative of the Mauritius Fire and Rescue Service; - The Chief Executive of the Municipal City Council, Municipal Town Council or

District Council; - The assistant Chief Executive of the Village Council; - A representative of the Central Electricity Board; - A representative of the Central Water Authority; - A representative of the Road Development Authority; - A representative of the Wastewater Management Authority; - A representative of the Water Resources Unit of the Ministry responsible for the

subject of public utilities; - A representative of the Mauritius Red Cross Society.

Coordinating all disaster risk reduction and management activities within their respective areas of jurisdiction;

Conducting an annual simulation exercise for tsunami/high waves, torrential rain and landslide in their area of jurisdiction;

Reference: Prime Minister’s Office (2014) ‘National Disasters Scheme 2014’.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-41

b. Organizations of Landslide Disaster Management15

The task of landslide monitoring was previously undertaken by the National Development Unit (NDU). It has been transferred to the Landslide Management Unit (LMU) which was established in the Civil Engineering Section in the Ministry of Public Infrastructure (MPI) in September 2009.

In line with the LMU, the table below shows the other main organizations which are responsible for landslide disaster management.

Table 2.6.2 Main Ministries and Organizations in Charge of Landslide Disaster Management

(source: JET)

Organization Organizationaltype

General missions relating to landslide disaster management

Ministry of Public Infrastructure, and Land Transport (MPI)

permanent National Development Unit (NDU) - Conducting site survey - Responsible for large scale river disasters

Landslide Management Unit (LMU) - Enhancing capacity of landslide monitoring - Conducting site survey - Responsible for large scale landslide disasters

Road Development Authority (RDA) - Conducting site survey - Responsible for large scale disasters on the

road National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Centre NDRRMC)

permanent Gathering information relating to landslide disasters

Coordinating all related stakeholders when landslide disaster occurs

Issuing national disaster scheme Police permanent Provides warning to all inhabitants based on

information from NDRRMC Supporting evacuation of inhabitants

Mauritius Meteorological Service (MMS)

permanent Providing rainfall data

Local Authorities permanent Conducting site survey with MPI/LMU, MPI/NDU and MPI/RDA

monitoring

Ministry of Housing and Land (MHL)

permanent Updating the Planning Policy Guidance (PPG)

Ministry of Health and Quality of Life (MHQL)

permanent Preparing medical and para-medical staff, special ward and ambulances

Ministry of Social Security, National Solidarity and Reform Institutions

permanent Providing emergency shelters

Ministry of Gender Equality, Child Development and Family Welfare

permanent Providing emergency shelters

Ministry of Education and Human Resources

permanent Closing all educational institutions in the affected areas

Ministry of Information and Communication Technology

permanent Establishing the effective ways to disseminate information to the public with the collaboration of Mauritius Telecom and other mobile operators

Government Information Service (GIS)

permanent Preparing illustrated posters and film strips to inform the dangers of landslide to the public

Mauritius Fire and Rescue Service

permanent Assisting evacuation if requested by the NDRRMC

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-42

Central Water Authority (CWA)

permanent Closing the valves on the pipelines in the landslide affected areas

Supplying water to the emergency shelters Reopening the valves in the reconstruction phase

Central Electricity Board permanent Cutting off the power supply in the landslide affected areas

Resupplying electricity in the reconstruction phaseMauritius Broadcasting Corporation (MBC)

permanent Broadcasting the warning in emergency situations

Mauritius Red Cross Permanent Assisting evacuation if requested by the NDRRMC

St. John Ambulance Permanent Assisting evacuation if requested by the NDRRMC

Reference: Prime Minister’s Office (2014) ‘National Disasters Scheme 2014’

Table 2.6.3 Main Ministries and Organizations in Charge of Landslide Disaster Management for Ordinary and Emergency Situations (source: JET)

MP

I

ND

RR

MC

Police

MM

S

Local Auth

orities

MH

L

MH

QL

Ministry of S

ocial Security, N

ational So

lidarity and Re

form

Institu

tion

s

Min

istry of G

end

er E

qua

lity, Ch

ild D

eve

lopm

ent an

d

Fa

mily W

elfa

re

Min

istry of E

duca

tion

and

Hu

man

Re

sou

rces

Min

istry of In

form

atio

n an

d C

om

mu

nica

tion Tech

no

logy

GIS

Mauritius F

ire and Rescue S

ervice

Central W

ater Authority (C

WA

)

Central E

lectricity Board

MB

C

Mauritius R

ed Cross

St. John A

mbulance

Monitoring and General Preparedness

Emergency situation

Stage I Stage II Stage III

* ■: The organizations with the responsibilities in the ordinary and emergency situations Reference: Prime Minister’s Office (2014) ‘National Disasters Scheme 2014’

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-43

2.7 Economic Survey

2.7.1 National Economic Indicators

The population of the Republic of Mauritius was estimated to be 1,296,303 in 2013, showing a growing rate of 0.4 % since 2012. In 2013, the population aged 0 to 14 years comprised 20 % of the total population. The population aged 15 to 64 years and that aged over 65 years comprised 71 % and 9 %, respectively of the total population16.

According to the Statistics Mauritius under the Ministry of Finance and Economic Development (MoFED), Mauritius marked unemployment ratio of 9.6 % in 2006 which was the highest over the past 30 years. Although the ratio decreased to 7.2 % in 2008, it has increased since then and reached 8.1 % in 201217.

The Gross Domestic Product (GDP), GDP per capita and GDP growth in Mauritius are summarized in the following table.

Table 2.7.1 GDP, GDP Per Capita and GDP Growth18

Item 2010 2011 2012 2013 GDP (current US$)

9,718,331,363 11,252,405,860 11,442,063,228 11,938,403,909

GDP per capita (current US$)

7,587 8,750 8,862 9,210

GDP growth (annual %)

4.1 3.9 3.2 3.2

According to the World Bank, Mauritius has shown steady improvement in economic growth in which annual GDP growth ratio is over 3 %. The World Bank also states that Mauritius has solid economic fundamentals: open to Foreign Direct Investment (USD 360 million and 3.4 % of GDP in 2012), export oriented (USD 6 billion and 55 % of GDP in 2012), high standards of governance (52nd in the 2013 Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index) and business friendly (the top-ranked African country in business climate, ranked 20th globally in the 2014 World Bank Doing Business report).

The economy of Mauritius is known as a ‘four-pillar’ economy: sugar, textiles, tourism and financial services. The four-pillar economy makes the country less vulnerable to economic volatility and accelerates economic growth by competitiveness and strong measures. The significant factors of each sector are as follows. Sugar cane plantation remains as an important sector in terms of its share in exports in which exporting sugar in 2012 increased by 3.5 per cent compared to 201119. In terms of tourism, the growth rates of its industry are 11.5 per cent in August 2013. As financial services are the most productive sector in Mauritius, a Special Fund of 50 million rupees is provided in order to enlarge the business market and to enhance reputation of Mauritius as an international financial center20.

Inflation rate in Mauritius kept almost less than 10 % for the period of 1992-2013. The rate from 2006 to 2008 was approximately 9 % which was relatively high over the past 30 years21. However the recent rates between 2010 and 2013 vary from around 3 % to 6.5 %: inflation rate of 2.9 % in 2010, 6.5 % in 2011, 3.9 % in 2012 and 3.5 % in 201322.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-44

Revenue and expenditure of the Government of Mauritius has been increasing: revenue in 2010 was 65 billion Mauritius rupees whereas 78 billion Mauritius rupees in 2013. On the other hand, expenditure in 2010 was 75 billion Mauritius rupees and 91 billion Mauritius rupees in 201322.

The budget deficit in 2013 is estimated at 3.7 % of GDP and 97 % of deficit is because of investment expenditure. Public sector debt is 54.8 % to GDP ratio and the Government of Mauritius targets 50 % of debt to GDP ratio by 201823.

2.7.2 National Economic Policies in Mauritius

Mauritius embarked on a multi-sector reform agenda in 2006 with the objective of improving the competitiveness of the economy. This reform had a considerable success in accelerating the rate of growth, reducing unemployment and speeding up the pace of diversification of the economy through the development of new sectors. The reform created fiscal space to allow the authorities to perform a comprehensive, well-targeted, and temporary counter-cyclical policy in early 2009 to mitigate the negative impacts of the global financial crisis. The fiscal stimulus contributed to absorb the shock of the 2007/08 global crisis, which was reinforced in August 2010, with a second four per cent of GDP stimulus package to cushion the impact of a weaker euro.

Since 2010, the Government of Mauritius embarked on a second generation reform programme to continue improving the country’s competitiveness as it transits to more diversified export markets, and ensures the inclusive growth for the entire population. The key elements of this reform are the improvement of (i) delivery of public services, including the civil service and public enterprises; (ii) infrastructure development, to overcome critical bottlenecks, particularly on transportation; (iii) skills enhanced through the improved productivity; (iv) social protection to provide opportunities for vulnerable population; and (v) further liberalization of non-tariff measures to improve trade competitiveness.

The introduction of Programme-Based Budgeting (PBB) by the Ministry of Finance and Economic Development (MoFED) has been a major step forward in modernizing the budget management and improving the budget process in Mauritius. While the general architecture of the PBB reforms is largely in place, the focus now is to gradually consolidate and deepen the reforms in order to reap the benefits of aligning the resource allocation with the policy priorities.

As a result of introducing the PBB, greater transparency and accountability has been engendered in the use and control of public funds. Indeed, it is expected that the PBB will increasingly be used in the public sector as a strategic management and decision-making tool to ensure more efficient and effective delivery of the public services.

In the short term, as a part of the efforts to improve the budgeting process and the general public finance framework, work in the following areas will be undertaken:

(i) the development and drafting of two major pieces of new legislation, for example, (a) the Public Finance Management Bill and (b) the Public Audit Bill which will further entrench accountability and transparency in the use of Public Funds;

(ii) Strengthening the link between planning and budgeting by encouraging Ministries to set

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-45

up Planning and Implementation Units (PIU) wherever applicable. The basic objective is to inculcate and enhance a culture of planning in a strategic manner which also means taking into account available financial and human resources at the disposal of a Ministry/Department while elaborating a plan for the delivery of public services. The key here is to ensure that whatever is planned will actually have a good chance of being implemented;

(iii) Further improvements in programme designs and performance indicators;

(iv) designing and implementing a PBB and related capacity building program that will provide for ongoing in-service training for public sector stakeholders, so as to broaden the understanding of PBB knowledge and as well as increase awareness of the benefits of its use as a strategic management tool;

(v) The implementation of a project to automate the budget process that will enhance budget preparation and expenditure analysis;

(vi) Further refinements to our procurement system as necessary complementary reforms to support the PBB and to ensure that blockages and bottlenecks in the procurement process are addressed so that the right balance between speed and transparency is achieved in project implementation;

(vii) Setting up of a Project Design and Monitoring Unit at MoFED to ensure value for money in project development and implementation;

(viii) developing further the Treasury Accounting System (TAS) to include reporting of nonfinancial data so as to improve monitoring and reporting in government; and

(ix) Linking the PBB framework with the on-going implementation of the Performance Management System (PMS).

Also at another length, the process of linking fiscal policy and the medium-term expenditure framework (MTEF) to strategic planning with credible expenditure ceilings that have a bearing on budget estimates will be further improved. The front-end of the overall budget process will be progressively strengthened to:

(i) Produce a full fiscal framework that integrates revenue, debt, deficit and expenditure policies with the fiscal strategy driving the determination of expenditure ceilings and

(ii) Enhance the linkages between policy priorities and resource allocation by ensuring early policy prioritization.

It is also envisaged that an assessment will be undertaken of the Public Financial Management (PFM) systems, processes and institutions using the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) methodology. The assessment will: i) provide an up-to-date quantitative and qualitative assessment of the PFM framework; ii) inform a government review of its performance, which is ongoing.

PFM reform programme through comparison with a baseline PEFA assessment undertaken in 2007; iii) be a key input to the design of further PFM reform activities and iv) provide the fiduciary and procurement review necessary for Government to discuss with developing

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-46

partners further cooperation for PFM reform.

There will be considerable efforts to improve ministry-wide strategic planning processes including plans that are aligned with the annual budget process. Whilst there are no reasons to duplicate the planning function in cases where they exist, the added purpose of revamping planning is to facilitate cross Ministry planning processes and support management so that plans and budgets are better linked in order to deliver on services. Moreover, as the quality of the plans improves over time, management will be in a better position to evaluate competing policies and programmes and their financial implications (investment, recurrent, manpower, etc) and allow for appropriate analyses to assist decision making by policy makers.

In addition to the PBB, new approaches have been introduced in order to improve the public expenditure management since 2013. For instance, the ministries prepare three year budget plan based on the long term outcomes and indicators as well as medium term action plans, the legislative framework for public expenditure management has been enhanced, a risk management strategy has been developed and a monitoring/evaluation system for budget execution has been established24.

2.7.3 Fiscal Policy for 2014

The Government of Mauritius sets the economic and social policies for Budget 2014 in order to achieve its goal of pursuing economic prosperity as well as social well-being.

a.1 Policies to enhance further investment and economic growth

The Government of Mauritius aims at strengthening the following in order to enhance further investment and economic growth.

Stabilization of macro economy and promotion of economic development.

Public investment: Investing in infrastructure of airports and seaports which enables to increase the movement of goods, services and people, and widen the economic activities.

Supporting the traditional economic sectors and developing the new economic architecture: Together with continuous support for the traditional sectors of tourism, financial services and agro industry, new economic pillars such as ocean and renewable energy are enhanced.

Supporting the Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): The Government provides the favorable measures including introduction of SMS financial schemes and loans to SMEs without guarantee.

Human resource development: As human capital is recognised as a high-impact accelerator to economic growth and social well-being, 14.8 billion Mauritius rupees are allocated to the education sector to support pre-primary schools, primary schools, secondary and tertiary education, and lifelong learning.

Improvement of working environment: The Government provides the comfortable working environment with consideration of wages, safety and health of the domestic and foreign workers.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-47

Enhancement of public sector: The Government of Mauritius aims at improving accountability and performance management of the public institutions in order to seek the most effective and efficient manners to deliver public services to the citizens.

a.2 Policies to further enhance modern, inclusive and caring society

The policies focusing on social security in 2014 are as follows:

Modernizing health care system: The Government of Mauritius provides 9.2 billion Mauritius rupees for the public health care in 2014 which will be used for training and recruiting health care personnel, reducing two major killer diseases of diabetes and cancer, and building the hospitals.

Natural disaster risk reduction: Based on the fact that the greater impact of natural disasters have occurred recently, the Government allocates budget for developing institutions such as a fully staffed National Risk Reduction and Management Centre, providing IT based early warning and emergency alert system, funding for emergency work and recruiting human resources.

Consolidating the social safety nets: The Government of Mauritius strengthens the social safety nets to support the vulnerable people, for example, increasing pensions for elderly people as well as social and benefits for children, and providing budget for vulnerable families living below the Poverty Intervention Line, people with disabilities and women at risk including domestic violence.

Promoting sports and culture: sports and cultural facilities are constructed and upgraded, and musical instruments are provided.

Improvement of living conditions: The Government provides budget for housing programmes for improving living conditions, changes the conditions on loans, and provides social housing.

Improvement of public services: As government’s rapid and efficient services for the public are required, the Government allocates 200 million rupees for improving the procedures with maximum use of technology.

Increase of consumption: The Government of Mauritius stimulates the economy through increasing consumers’ purchasing power with the improvement of their earning capacities, creation of higher productivity jobs and VAT refund for certain products.

Maximizing the development potential of Rodrigues and Agalega: Investment on tourism and social economic development are enhanced.

2.7.4 Fiscal Policy of the Ministry of Public Infrastructure (MPI) 2014-2016

Based on the Programme Based Budgeting (PBB), the Ministry of Public Infrastructure and Land Transport (MPI) set a strategic direction for the next three years as follows (quoted from the ‘Budget Speech 2014’25):

Adoption of an Improved Road Maintenance Programme on a performance based approach to ensure preservation of the road network and to improve road safety,

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-48

mobility and connectivity.

Introduce the Light Rail Transit System to provide an alternative mode of public transport, and to support a more efficient and modern inland transportation service.

Incorporation of sustainable design and construction principles, practices and norms to ensure alignment with the Maurice Ile Durable strategy.

Improve road safety through introduction of appropriate road safety devices and regular Road Safety Audits.

Decentralise and privatise vehicles examination service.

Integrate and harmonise the functions of drain construction, maintenance and cleaning through creation of a National Drainage Agency.

Improve community facilities by constructing and upgrading social and sports infrastructure in line with the Maurice Ile Durable strategy.

The financial resources by programmes and sub-programmes for MPI for 2014-2016 are shown in the table below.

Table 2.7.2 Budget for the MPI25

Code Programmes and Sub Programmes 2014

estimates 2015

planned 2016

planned 321 322 32202 32203 32204 323 32301 32302 324 32401 32402

Policy and Strategy Development for Public Infrastructure ,Land Transport and Maritime Services Construction and Maintenance of Government Buildings and Other Assets Design and supervision of the construction of Building and related Infrastructure Maintenance, Repairs and Rehabilitation of Buildings and Other Assets. Design, Construction and Maintenance of Electrical Systems in Public Buildings (ESD) Construction and Maintenance of Roads and Bridges Construction and Rehabilitation of Roads and Bridges Maintenance of Roads and Bridges Land Transport Management Road Transport Management Traffic Management and Road Safety

146,790,000

561,694,000

156,616,000

300,848,000

109,410,000

912,000,000

- -

1,464,989,000

1,258569,000

207,420,000

149,090,000

529,310,000

165,641,000

254,259,000

104,230,000

1,197,200,000

- -

1,404,934,000

1,257,364,000

147,570,000

151,875,000

529,277,000

168,991,000

248,945,000

111,341,000

1,372,400,000

- -

1,413,838,000

1,250,730,000

153,108,000

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-49

325 404 405

Maritime Safety and Development Community-Based Infrastructure and Public Empowerment Land Drainage and Watershed Management

91,376,000

441,702,000

430,217,000

72,681,000

341,594,000

317,001,000

71,426,000

334,257,000

242,213,000

Total 4,049,768,000 4,011,810,000 4,115,286,000

2.7.5 Budget for LMU

The annual budget for the LMU from 2015 to 2017 is shown in the following table.

Table 2.7.3 Budget for the LMU from 2015 to 2017 (source: JET)

Item

Classification of

Disaster 2015 2016 2017

Vat component for Countermeasure Construction Works

Chitrakoot (Block A) - Section 1 Landslide 2,250,000Consultancy Services for Countermeasure Construction Works

Chitrakoot (Block A) - Section 2 landslide 400,000 Vallee Pitot (near Eidgah) landslide 450,000 Morcellement Hermitage, Coromandel Slope failure 250,000

L'Eau Bouillie Damage of

embankment250,000

Pailles access road to Les Guibies and along motorway, near flyover bridge

Slope failure 350,000

Pailles Soreze region Slope failure 500,000

Riviere des Anguilles, near the bridge Stream erosion

450,000

Post Relocation Works at Quatre Soeurs, Marie Jeanne, Jhummah Streert, Old Grand Port

landslide 250,000

Piper Morcellement Piat Stream erosion

150,000

Temple Road, Creve Coeur Damage of

wall 100,000

Congomah Village Council (Ramlakhan) Stream erosion

100,000

Congomah Village Council (Leekraj) Damage of

wall 100,000

Congomah Village Council (Frederick) Damage of

wall 100,000

Congomah Village Council (Blackburn Lanes)

Damage of embankment

100,000

Les Mariannes Community Centre (Road area)

Slope failure 100,000

Les Mariannes Community Centre (Resident area)

Stream erosion

100,000

Le Pouce Street Stream erosion

100,000

Justice Street (near Kalimata Mandir) Damage of

wall 400,000

Pouce Stream Stream erosion

300,000

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-50

Pailles access road Morcellement des Aloes from Avenue M.Leal (on hillside)

Stream erosion

150,000

Plaine Champagne Road, opposite "Musee Touche Dubois"

Slope failure 100,000

Chamarel near Restaurant Le Chamarel and Road Side

Damage of embankment

100,000

Baie du Cap: (i) Near St Francois d'Assise Church

Debris flow 100,000

Bambous Virieux, Rajiv Gandhi Street (near Bhavauy House), Impasse Bholoa

Slope failure 100,000

Trou-Aux-Cerfs Slope failure 100,000

River Bank at Cite L'Oiseau Stream erosion

100,000

Louis de Rochecouste (Riviere Seche) Stream erosion

100,000

Montee S, GRNW Stream erosion

100,000

Chitrakoot (Block B) Landslide 400,000 Construction on countermeasures Chitrakoot (Block A) - Section 2 Landslide 8,000,000 Vallee Pitot (near Eidgah landslide 9,000,000 Maconde Region Baie du Cap - Phase 2 Rock fall 10,000,000

Boulevard Victoria, Montagne Coupe Damage of

wall 7,000,000

Chitrakoot (Block B) Landslide 6,000,000

L'Eau Bouillie Damage of

embankment5,000,000

Pailles: (i) access road to Les Guibies Slope failure 7,000,000 Pailles: (iii) Soreze region Slope failure 3,000,000

Riviere des Anguilles, near the bridge Stream erosion

9,000,000

Piper Morcellement Piat Stream erosion

3,000,000

Temple Road, Creve Coeur Damage of

wall

Will be decided based on the detail survey

Remote Monitoring System

Chitrakoot, Vallee Pitot, Quatre- Soeurs and La Butte

Landslide 7,000,000

Consultancy Services for Investigation Old Moka Road, Camp Chapelon Landslide 575,000

Candos Hill, LallBahadoor Shastri and Mahatma Gandhi Avenues

Landslide 125,000

Consultancy Services for Preparation of Hazard Maps 1,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000

Consultancy Fees for Expert on Retainer Basis 2,500,000 2,500,000 1,000,000

Overtime Work for LMU 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000Maintenance and Repairs of Equipments 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000

TOTAL 55,650,000 40,100,000 44,700,000

Reference: interview survey with MPI/LMU

Among the programmes and sub-programmes mentioned above, budget for Programme 322 “Construction and Maintenance of Government Building and Other Assets” has been secured in connection with the Repair and Rehabilitation Unit (RRU) in the Civil Engineering Section. The Repair and Rehabilitation Unit is attached to the Landslide Management Unit.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

2-51

Sub-Programme 32203: Maintenance, Repairs and Rehabilitation of Buildings and Other Assets

Priority Objectives:

• Ensure the useful life of government buildings and other assets is enhanced through proper rehabilitation and regular maintenance

Major Services:

• Maintenance of Government buildings is carried out according to standards25

Reference for Chapter 2

1 Wikimedia Commons 2 Directorate of overseas surveys (UK) (1962): Soil Map of Mauritius, Public Works and Survey Department, Port Louis Mauritius 3 Foundation of Technical Center of Landslide and Sabo, Vol.64 P.5 4 Dep. of Energy HP 5 Cyclone and Other Natural Disasters Scheme, 2010-2011 6 Port Louis City, Plan and Investigation for Landslide countermeasures , Finals report - summary, JICA, 1990 7 Ministry of Public Infrastructure Land Transport and Shipping (2011): Geotechnical Report for Suspected Landslide at Quatre Soeurs 8 Dr. A. Chan Chim Yuk, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mauritius (2006): Monitoring of Geotechnical Works at the Site of the La Butte Landslide 9 2010 Land use map of Mauritius, 2010, Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute 10 Housing and Population Census, 2000, Central Statistical Office (under the aegis of the Ministry of Finance & Economic Development), Mauritius 11 Poverty statistics, 2006, Central Statistical Office (under the aegis of the Ministry of Finance & Economic Development), Mauritius 12 The School Atlas of Mauritius, 2012, A. Cader Kalla, Osman Publishing 13 V. Proag, Water resources management in Mauritius, 2006, European Water 15/16 14 Prime Minister’s Office (2011) ‘Cyclone and Other Natural Disasters Scheme 2010-2011’, Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development (MoESD) (2012) ‘Disaster Risk Reduction Strategic Framework and Action Plan for the Republic of Mauritius’ MoESD (2009) ‘Report on The Status of Laws and Institutions to Protect Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Mauritius’ Interview survey by JICA Expert Team 15 Prime Minister’s Office (2014) ‘National Disasters Scheme 2014’ 16 World Bank (2014) ‘Population data’ <http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL>. 17 Statistics Mauritius (2014) ‘Unemployment Rate 1992-2012’ <http://mauritius.africadata.org/ 18 World Bank (2014) ‘GDP’ <http://data.worldbank.org/indicator>. 19 MFED (2013) ‘Digest of Agricultural Statistics 2012’ <http://statsmauritius.gov.mu/English/Publications/Documents/Regular%20Reports/annual%20digest/annualdig12.pdf>. 20 MFED (2013) ‘Budget Speech 2014’ <http://mof.gov.mu/English/Documents/Budget2014/BudgetSpeech2014.pdf>. 21 Statistics Mauritius (2014) ‘Inflation Rate 1992-2013’ <http://mauritius.africadata.org/>. 22 IMF (2014) ‘World Economy Outlook Database’ <http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2014/01/weodata/index.aspx>. 23 Statistics Mauritius (2014) ‘Inflation Rate 1992-2013’ <http://mauritius.africadata.org/>. 24 MFED (2013) ‘Budget Speech 2014 Foreword’ <http://mof.gov.mu/English/Documents/Budget2014/PBB2014/Foreword.pdf>. 25 Ministry of Finance and Economic Development (2014) ‘Budget Speech 2014: budget for MPI’, <http://mof.gov.mu/English/Documents/Budget2014/PBB2014/VPMMPI.pdf>.

Chapter 3

Landslide Management Plan 1 (Survey and Results)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-1

3 Landslide Management Plan 1 (Survey and Results)

3.1 Landslide Hazard Area

In consideration of requests from Mauritius, three high priority landslide hazard areas were selected through consultations with C/P, along with the results of the basic survey and the landslide management plan. The following was taken into consideration when selecting the priority areas:

・Areas that scored highest in the site reconnaissance landslide hazard evaluation are to be prioritized,

・MPI’s requests are given consideration, and

・From the viewpoint of technology transfer, several different landslide sizes are to be chosen where possible (recommendation from advisory committee in Japan).

The high priority landslide hazard areas chosen are: Chitrakoot, Quatre Soeurs, Vallee Pitot

Chitrakoot area: Active large-scale landslide (L=1,500m, W=700m). Because more than 10 houses have been damaged, immediate measures are expected. MPI has requested an investigation and measures.

Quatre Soeurs area: Active middle-scale landslide (L=350m, W=400m), because several houses have been damaged, immediate measures are expected. MPI has requested an investigation and measures.

Vallee Pitot area: Active small-scale landslide (L=35m, W=20m). Because three houses have been damaged and were reported in a newspaper, immediate measures are expected. This is a typical example of a landslide that is affecting urban development.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-2

Table 3.1.1 Results of Landslide Hazard Area Selection (source: JET)

Area name

Selection criteria

Result Summary

Score of landslide hazard

evaluation

Request from MPI

Landslide size

Chitrakoot, Vallee des Pretres

6 Request

Large scale

(L=1500m,

W=700m)

○

Landslide Hazard Area Active large-scale landslide (L=1,500m, W=700m). Because more than 10 houses have been damaged, immediate measures are expected. MPI has requested an investigation and measures.

Vallee Pitot (near Eidgah)

6 No-

request

Small scale

(L=35m, W=20m)

○

Landslide Hazard Area Active small-scale landslide (L=35m, W=20m). Because three houses have been damaged and were reported in a newspaper, immediate measures are expected. This is a typical example of a landslide that is affecting urban development.

Mgr. Leen Street and vicinity, La

Butte 5

No- request

Middle scale

(L=350m,W=600m)

Excluded The countermeasure was done with the support of Japan. Because it is now quite stable, the urgency of measures is low.

Old Moka Road, Camp Chapelon

3 No-

request

Middle scale

(L=200m,W=100m)

Excluded Deformation by landslide was confirmed but the movement is slower than in Chitrakoot and Quatre Soeurs and is not affecting surrounding houses. Further observation is necessary although the urgency of measures is low.

Quatre Soeurs, Marie Jeanne,

Jhummah Streert, Old Grand Port

6 Request

Middle scale

(L=350m ,W=400m

)

○

Landslide Hazard Area Active middle-scale landslide (L=350m,W=400m), Because several houses have been damaged, immediate measures are expected. MPI has requested an investigation and measures.

Candos Hill at Lallbahadoor Shastri and

Mahatma Gandhi Avenues

3 No-

request

Small scale

(L=40m, W=35m)

ExcludedSmall scale. There are no houses that need protecting within the landslide area. Further observation is necessary, although the urgency of measures is low.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-3

3.2 Topographic Survey

In order to conduct landslide investigation and analysis, small scale plan maps and cross-section-surveying data are needed. In the main investigation, cross-section surveying and creation of plan maps were performed in (approximately) the following three areas. The location maps and survey areas of the three areas are shown in Figure 3.2.1 to Figure 3.2.6.

Table 3.2.1 Table of Quantities of Survey Areas (source: JET)

No. Name Plan map (Area) Cross section Profile

1 Chitrakoot 1.8km2 (1,800m X 1000m) Cross section profile of three directions.2 Quatre Soeurs 0.16km2 (400m X 400m) Cross section profile of one direction. 3 Vallee Pitot 0.005km2 (70m X 70m) Cross section profile of one direction.

3.2.1 Specifications

Cross-section surveying and plan map are created according to the following specifications.

a. Cross-Section Surveying

Vertical direction: Scale (1:100)

Level direction: Scale (1:100)

Equipment used: Total Station equipment

Coordinate system and standard of height: UTM40S Zone. The control point of Mauritius nearest to a survey area is used.

Measurement: measurements are taken at 5 m intervals on a section line (X,Y,Z) and also turning point position is measured.

b. Plan Map

Scale: 1:500

Contour interval: 1 m, a cross section line and benchmark are shown on the plan map.

3.2.2 Deliverables

Cross section maps and plan maps are to be created in DXF or DWG format of AutoCAD. The deliverables are as follows.

1) All the observational data and calculation result data

2) Cross section maps

3) Plan maps

4) Reports

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-4

Figure 3.2.1 Chitrakoot, Plan Map (source: JET)

Figure 3.2.2 Chitrakoot, Cross Section (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-5

Figure 3.2.3 Quatre Soeurs, Plan Map (source: JET)

Figure 3.2.4 Quatre Soeurs, Cross Section (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-6

Figure 3.2.5 Vallee Pitot, Plan Map (source: JET)

Figure 3.2.6 Vallee Pitot, Cross Section (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-7

3.3 Geological Survey

3.3.1 Geology of the Landslide Area

a. Chitrakoot

Chitrakoot district is situated on a low slope at the foot of the steep bedrock. The bedrock is mainly composed of basaltic lava and also other volcanic products, while it develops joints parallel to the lower slope. Furthermore, plastic to liquid state of soils are found at the foot of the lower slope where multiple springs are observed.

Figure 3.3.1 shows the topography and Figure 3.3.2 an aerial photograph of the target area.

Figure 3.3.1 Topographic Map of the Site Figure 3.3.2 Aerial Photograph of the Site

(source: JET)

Chitrakoot district displays distinctive morphological properties of a landslide consisted of multiple sliding blocks whose boundaries are vaguely defined. The red dashed line shown in Figure 3.3.2 is the boundary of the landslides delineated from a topographic map while the red solid line shows the extent of active sliding confirmed from the field survey.

Within the active landslide boundary, deformation appears on houses and cracks have developed on retaining walls. Scarp and small vertical displacements are also observed at the

Photo 3.3.1 Full View of Landslide Area (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-8

head of a block.

Photo 3.3.2 Scarp in Landslide Area Photo 3.3.3 Active Area of Landslide

(source: JET)

The outline of geological features at Chitrakoot by the past investigation is shown below.

・ Topsoil is very thin clayey layer varying from 30 to 70cm in thickness.

・ The second layer mainly consists of brownish highly weathered silt and clay mass containing stones and gravels: this colluvial soil develops alternating layers with frequent plastic and wet clayey layers. The thickness varies from one to several meters.

・ The following layer is a succession of brownish to light brown highly weathered basalt, with interstratified plastic clayey layers caused by weathering of old basalt. These layers may persist on 3 to 4 meters with various weathering degrees and colors. Note that yellow to brown weathered tuff with fine volcanic ash particles were occasionally found in some of the boreholes.

・ In some boreholes, 1 to 2 m thick interstratified alluvial sand and gravels were occasionally found in the colluvia and hard basaltic rocks.

・ Finally, slightly weathered and fractured basalt develops at the bottom of each borehole, which solidifies in the underneath layer. The solidified basalt can be grouped into two different types: hard and compacted basaltic conglomerate with grey to red color containing zeolithes and fine grained fractured basalts with grey to black color.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-9

Table 3.3.1 Outline of Stratum1

Type Thickness of

layer (m) Stratum features

Topsoil &

Colluvia

0.3～0.7 Topsoil and brown silt with clay 1.0～

several meters

Brown and extremely wet plastic clay

Colluvia: Brown silt changing to silt with gravel and plastic clay

Weathered Rock

& other

3.0～4.0

Weak, highly weathered multicolored basalts Weak, highly weathered basalts with red to brown in color Weak, highly weathered yellow to brown basaltic conglomerate with thin brown clay layers Weak, highly fractured basalts with small olivines Highly fractured basalts with olivines Weak ,highly weathered brown or red old burned topsoil Yellow to brown weathered tuff with ashes

Rock －

Grey to black, fine grained fractured basalts Strong, grey fractured basalt comprised of small pieces of 4 to 5cm Fine-grained, grey basalt Strong, fine-grained grey basalt moderately fractured Alluviums made up of 0.2-3cm fine-grained, brown to grey gravel Hard and compact grey basaltic conglomerate with zeolithes

b. Quatre Soeurs

According to the Geological Map of Mauritius (Figure 3.3.3), the area at the foot of the mountain are located on superficial colluvium constituted mainly of pebbles and gravels that result from the dismantling of the upper slope old basaltic lavas of the Beau Champ Mountain. The ancient formations of the Beau Champ Mountains are marked by high slopes (sloping at 48°towards the sea on the site) and relieves generated from the presence of dykes or intrusive plugs which have been cleared and shaped by weathering and erosion. The gradient of the hills is flatter on the seaward side, while on the inland side there are steep cliffs.

Figure 3.3.3 Location of the Site on Geological Map2

In the coastal region of Quatre Soeurs, beaches are composed of sand, silt and pebbly mud which originate from the mouths of multiple streams in the region. Saddul labeled the area from the estuary of Grand River located about 1km north of the site to Mahebourg as being of

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-10

a type D (or Old Series) coastline. The basic features of the Type D coastline include a wide continental shelf of more than 5km and the weathered mountains of Old Series that are situated in close proximity of the coastline providing an abundant load of sediments of all sizes to the coastal zone.

According to the Soil Map of Mauritius, the dominant soil type of the area is the Mountain Slope Complexes that are dark brown to reddish brown silty clays or clays. The upper slopes are covered by lithosols, which constitute the unique terrains such as rough mountains, gorges and unweathered rockland in this area.

Geology of the project site consists of Breccias originating from old basaltic lavas and colluvial deposits with varying thickness according to depositional sequence and topographical locations.

The feature of the stratum is shown below.

Photo 3.3.4 Full View of Landslide Area (source: JET)

Photo 3.3.5 Road at the Toe of The Landslide (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-11

Table 3.3.2 Features of Stratum2

Type Thickness of layer Stratum features

Topsoil and Fill material

Average 0.5m

Topsoil is generally described as firm brown gravelly medium plasticity clay with occasional roots and cobbles. This stratum is described as very soft to firm gravelly / high to medium plasticity clay with occasional fragments of coral or roots and plastic bags.

Colluvium Upper Slope 1.0mLower Slope 4.8m

The layer is generally described as soft to firm brown gravelly / high to medium plasticity clay with occasional cobbles.

Colluvium of Breccia

0.71～9.0m The layer is generally described as soft to stiff gravelly high plasticity clay. Color is brown with purple, yellow, orange and grey mottles.

Alluvium and Marine Deposit

0.85～2.44m

Alluvium is generally dense, grey clayey gravel with yellowish discolorations and occasional cobbles originating from moderately weathered basalt. Marine deposit is described as brown with black mottles, very soft gravelly clay with high plasticity containing occasional fragments of coral.

Completely to Highly Weathered Breccias

Average 3.0m This layer is generally purple, grey or brown with yellow or orange mottles, soft to stiff gravelly clay with high to medium plasticity.

Weathered Basalt

Average 4.0m

Completely to highly weathered basalt layer is comprised of firm grey clay with high plasticity and weak to moderately weak grey or yellowish cream-colored medium-grained basalt. Highly to moderately weathered basalt is comprised of moderately weak to moderately strong grey medium-grained basalt with joints in-filled with yellowish brown clay. Moderately weathered basalt is described as moderately weak to moderately strong grey fine-grained basalt. Slightly weathered basalt is described as moderately strong to strong grey fine-grained basalt.

Weathered Breccia

0.2～4.0m

Weathered breccia is described as moderately weak purplish grey medium-grained breccia with yellowish cream discolorations. Slightly weathered breccia is described as moderately strong to strong medium-grained olivine basalt having purplish grey color with white dots.

3.3.2 Laboratory Test

Laboratory soil tests will be conducted when the ground investigation is conducted if required. There are basically two major laboratory soil tests for determining stability of landslide, namely: 1) mechanical tests, and 2) physical tests. While mechanical testing is used to understand the strength property of slip surface which affects the result of stability evaluation, physical testing is used to review the test results and grasp the general characteristics of the ground.

Shear strength (of ground materials) decreases from its maximum state to residual state as shear deformation progresses (Figure 3.3.4). The shear strength of the slip surface in certain landslides are considered to be close to residual state because the slip surface has experienced large displacement in the past specifically for those landslides with distinctive sliding topographies and/or those that are active and have already moved extensively. Several conditions of shear strength are believed to exist such as close to the fully softened strength or intermediate strength between fully softened and residual strength according to the history of landslide movement.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-12

The repeated single shear and/or ring shear strength tests are conducted for measuring the value of resistance shear strength of the slip surface (Table 3.3.3). The original status of the soil shall be maintained for the proper soil sampling.

For the purpose of mechanical test, 1) fixed piston sampler, and 2) multi-rod rotary sampler shall be used when test samples are taken from the drilling core so that the sample cores stay undisturbed. The block samples from the surface of cut surface or large diameter wells are also considered as good sampling sites.

Figure 3.3.4 An Explanatory Drawing of Peak Strength and Residual Strength3

Table 3.3.3 Application for Soil Strength and Mechanical Property Test3

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-13

a. Physical Test

a.1 Particle Size Analysis

Particle size distribution（ISO 17892-4）analysis is conducted to grasp the particle size distribution of the soil at slip surface. For smaller particles, in addition to screen analysis, sedimentation analysis, density analysis (density of fine-grained soils and solid particles: ISO 17892-2, ISO 17892-3), and water content analysis（ISO 17892-1）are also conducted.

Figure 3.3.5 shows the particle size distributions of soils taken from the slip surfaces of multiple landslides in Japan’s major geological zones. Higher content of clay materials are predominant in the tertiary and thermal landslides whereas higher content of sand and gravels are typically observed in crystalline schist landslides. The test samples shall be properly taken from the exact area of the slip surface. Targeting the slip surface can be difficult in some cases as the sliding layer can be extremely thin and the particle size composition may vary depending on the distance from the slip surface.

When residual strength is tested using disturbed samples, the samples are often screened using a screen with 425 microns of mesh size beforehand to compare the result with consistency properties such as liquid limit and plastic index. Hence, particle size distribution should reflect that of slip surface for the result of strength testing to be legitimate.

The information of particle size distribution is required to evaluate the adequacy of processes for choosing samples and of testing conditions such as grain size adjustment, in addition to understanding mechanical properties of slip surface based on the result of mechanical tests.

Figure 3.3.5 Typical Particle Size Distribution of Slip Surface Soil for Each Geological Zone in

Japan4

a.2 Atterberg Limits

Liquid limit and plastic limit of the soil (ISO 17892-12) are tested to grasp the characteristics of consistency at the slip surface. Figure 3.3.6 shows the relation between the plastic index (IP) of slip surface clay at various geological zones and residual shear resistance angle (φr'). Although the figure only represents datasets with particle sizes smaller than 425 microns, clays containing high IP values tend to have smaller φr' value while relation with φr' distribution or IP varies by geology. The activity of soil sample (below IP/2μm particle size content) indicates the content of swelling clay minerals.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-14

The test results are used along with grain particle size distribution to understand mechanical properties of layers comprising the slip surface.

Figure 3.3.6 Relation of Plasticity Index and Residual Shear Stress Angle for Various

Geological Zones5

b. Test for Mechanical Properties

Mechanical testing is implemeted to grasp the shear strength which changes from peak to fully softened and residual strength according to the soil’s stress history. When conducting stability analysis, he/she needs to choose one of the status of shear strength as a parameter. Although studies have been done into which strength should be adopted for stability analysis, a clear answer has not been provided. Furtheremore, the strength of soils can also vary within the slip surface. Therefore, the results of the physical test are only regarded as references in Japan, and instead, reverse calculation method is mostly employed in practice.

Table 3.3.4 shows the testing methods appropriate for each type of shear strength. The peak strength is determined by unconsolidated tri-axial test/cyclic shear test/ring shear test of undisturbed sample. The fully softened strength is determined by mainly unconsolidated tri-axial of undisturbed sample and by minor cyclic shear test/ring shear test of slurry sample/undisturbed sample. The residual strength is measured not by unconsolidated tri-axial test but by cyclic shear test/ring shear test.

Although the sample of slip surface can realistically reproduce the strength condition of the site, it is quite difficult to set it on test device.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-15

Table 3.3.4 Selection of Test Method for Type of Sample and Characteristics of Strength Obtained by Test6

b.1 Cyclic Direct Shear Test

The test is performed on three or four specimens from a relatively undisturbed soil sample. A specimen is placed in a shear box which has two stacked rings to hold the sample; the contact between the two rings is at approximately the mid-height of the sample. A confining stress is applied vertically to the specimen, and the upper ring is pulled laterally until the sample fails, or through a specified strain. The load applied and the strain induced is recorded at frequent intervals to determine a stress-strain curve for the confining stress.

Cyclic direct shear tests can be performed under several conditions. The sample is normally saturated before the test is run, but can be run at the in-situ moisture content. The rate of strain can be varied to create a test of undrained or drained conditions, depending on whether the strain is applied slowly enough for water in the sample to prevent pore-water pressure buildup.

Several specimens are tested at varying confining stresses to determine the shear strength parameters, the soil cohesion (c) and the angle of internal friction (commonly friction angle) (ϕ). The results of the tests on each specimen are plotted on a graph with the peak (or residual) stress on the x-axis and the confining stress on the y-axis. The y-intercept of the curve which fits the test results is the cohesion, and the slope of the line or curve is the friction angle.

Figure 3.3.7 and Figure 3.3.8 show the structure of a cyclic shear test device, and relation between shear stress and accumulative shear displacement. Figure 3.3.9 shows a schematic figure of a shear box that is able to measure the friction force.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-16

Figure 3.3.7 Structure of Cyclic Shear Test Device7

（a）undisturbed soil （b）disturbed soil

Figure 3.3.8 Relation between Shear Stress and Accumulative Shear Displacement7

Figure 3.3.9 Measuring the Friction Force between Two Shear Boxes8

Mitachi et al.(1999) proposed a method which strength values for countermeasure design are determined on c-tanφ graph based on a peak strength, a fully softened strength and a residual strength with cyclic shear test (Figure 3.3.10). Point A is a peak strength, Point B is a fully softened strength and point C is a residual strength in the figure. Point D crossing between the line A, B, C and c-tanφ line should be adopted for design in this method.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-17

Figure 3.3.10 Method of Determining Strength Factor for Design Using C-Tanφ Diagram9

Figure 3.3.11 shows a schematic figure of direct shear test for slip surface, which can measure the shear strength on the slip surface. The shear line in the machine is accorded along the actual slip surface.

Figure 3.3.12 shows the procedure of the sample for the direct shear test for slip surface.

Figure 3.3.11 Structure of Shear-Test Device10

Figure 3.3.12 Method of Making Test Piece That Includes Slip Surface10

b.2 Tri-Axial Shear Test

The principle behind a triaxial shear test is that the stress applied in the vertical direction (along the axis of the cylindrical sample) can be different from the stresses applied in the horizontal directions perpendicular to the sides of the cylinder, i.e. the confining pressure.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-18

A solid is defined as a material that can support shear stress without moving. However, every solid has an upper limit to how much shear stress it can support. The triaxial test is designed to measure that limit. The stress on the platens is increased until the material in the cylinder fails and forms sliding regions within itself, known as shear bands. A motion where a material is deformed under shear stress is known as shearing. The geometry of the shearing in a triaxial test typically causes the sample to become shorter while bulging out along the sides. The stress on the platen is then reduced and the water pressure pushes the sides back in, causing the sample to grow taller again. This cycle is usually repeated several times while collecting stress and strain data about the sample.

During the shearing, a granular material will typically have a net gain or loss of volume. If it had originally been in a dense state, then it typically gains volume, a characteristic known as Reynolds' dilatancy. If it had originally been in a very loose state, then contraction may occur before the shearing begins or in conjunction with the shearing.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-19

Figure 3.3.13 Structure of Triaxial Shear Test Device3

c. Results of Past Laboratory Soil Tests

The tests shown in Table 3.3.5 below were conducted in Chitrakoot and Quatre Soeurs in the past, and soil tests as shown in Table 3.3.6 were carried out.

Table 3.3.5 Previous Survey Report (source: JET)

No Report Company

1 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION AT CHITRAKOOT VALLEE DES PRETRES

SOTRAMON LIMITEE

2 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR SUSPECTED LANDSLIDE AT QUATRE SOEURS

WATER RESEARCH CO.LTD

Table 3.3.6 List of Laboratory Soil Tests Conducted (source: JET)

Item No Description of Test Chitrakoot Quatre Soeurs 1 Specific gravity ○ ○

2 Natural moisture content ○ ○

3 Atterberg limits ○ ○

4 Particle size distribution ○ ○

5 Unconfined compression ○ ○

6 Shear box ○ －

7 Triaxial ○ ○

8 Bulk density ○ ○

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-20

c.1 Chitrakoot

The laboratory soil test results of the past investigation are shown below.

Table 3.3.7 Results of Physical Test (source: JET)

Drilling No. Depth (m) Geology

Specificgravity (g/cm3)

Moisture content

(%)

Atterberg Limits (%)

Bulk Unit Wt (kN/m3) LL PL

BPP5 2.00～2.50 Colluvium 2.790 42.0 89.0 34.0 17.84

7.00～8.00 Highly weathered basalt 2.780 38.0 65.0 35.0 18.20

BPP6 7.25～7.80 Highly weathered basalt

2.810 52.0 58.0 39.0 16.69

BPP8

4.50～5.00 Colluvium 2.780 50.0 61.0 31.0 17.37

8.00～8.50 Highly weathered basalt 31.0 49.0 29.0 18.91

12.00～12.75 Highly weathered basalt 2.670 52.0 54.0 30.0 17.22

BPP9

2.60～2.93 Highly weathered basalt

2.640 42.6 74.0 30.0 16.61

4.10～4.54 Weathered basalt 2.780 38.0 60.0 32.0 17.48

7.30～7.85 Highly weathered basalt 2.750 26.0 56.0 35.0 17.76

BPP13

1.53～2.20 Colluvium 2.780 38.0 60.0 32.0 18.883.30～3.66 Colluvium 2.780 36.0 71.0 31.0 18.81

5.50～6.00 Highly weathered basalt 34.0

BPP14 4.85～5.40 Colluvium 42.0 72.0 44.0

BPP15 7.50～8.00 Colluvium 35.0 55..0 32.0 9.00～9.50 Colluvium 27.0 59.0 30.0

BPP16 3.15～3.65 Wet plastic clay 40.0 64.0 33.0 17.985.00～5.50 Wet plastic clay 33.0 57.0 25.0 18.837.00～7.50 Weathered tuff 51.0

BPP18 3.00～3.50 Colluvium 35.0 57.0 34.0 5.50～6.00 Weathered tuff 34.0 77.0 46.0 17.88

Table 3.3.8 Results of Physical Test (source: JET)

Drilling No. Depth (m) Geology

Specificgravity (g/cm3)

Moisture content

(%)

Atterberg Limits(%)

Bulk Unit Wt (kN/m3) LL PL

BPI2 8.00～8.40 Colluvium 2.820 30.0 75.0 34.0

12.05～12.70 Highly weathered basalt 29.0 67.0 38.0

BPI4 5.40～6.00 Highly weathered basalt 54.0 66.0 34.0 17.06

BPI9

3.10～3.65 Colluvium 2.800 41.0 66.0 39.0 6.00～6.50 Weathered tuff 44.0 73.0 37.0

8.40～9.00 Highly weathered basalt

47.0 73.0 37.0

10.00～10.56 Weathered tuff 55.0 73.0 37.0

BPI10

3.00～3.50 Colluvium 29.0 63.0 35.0

4.50～5.00 Highly weathered basalt 45.0 70.0 45.0

5.50～6.00 Highly weathered basalt 49.0 75.0 50.0

6.50～7.00 Highly weathered basalt

39.0 75.0 48.0

8.00～8.40 Weathered tuff 2.780 36.0 82.0 46.0 17.339.00～9.50 Weathered tuff 38.0 65.0 46.0

10.00～10.50 Highly weathered basalt 27.0 58.0 38.0

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-21

Table 3.3.9 Results of Shear Box Test (source: JET)

Drilling No.

Depth (m) Geology Moisture content

(%)

Bulk.U.Wt

(kN/m3)

Shear strength parameters

Peak Values Residual ValuesC1

(kN/m2)φ1 (°)

C1r (kN/m2)

φ1r (°)

BPI-4 5.40～6.00 Clay and silt 39.6 17.06 11 22 14 21 BPI-10 8.00～8.40 Weathered tuff 36.9 17.33 27 25 19.5 23

BPP-6 7.25～7.80 Highly weathered basalt

52.0 16.63 12 28

BPP-8 4.50～5.00 Colluvium 50.0 17.24 28.5 29

BPP-8 12.00～12.75

Highly weathered basalt

52.0 17.08 26 30

Table 3.3.10 Results of Triaxial Compression (source: JET)

Drilling No.

Depth (m) Geology

Moisture content (%)

Before consolidation Shear strength

parameters Bulk.U.

Wt (kN/m3)

Dry.U.Wt

(kN/m3) Before After C1

(kN/m2)φ1 (°)

BPP5 8.35～8.85 Highly weathered basalt

38.3 39.6 19.2 13.9 38.7 30.5

BPP8 11.00～11.50

Highly weathered basalt

55.2 53.4 17.8 11.5 94.0 14.3

c.2 Quatre Soeurs

The laboratory soil test results of the previous investigation are shown below.

Table 3.3.11 Results of Physical Test (source: JET)

Drilling No.

Depth (m) Geology Natural

Moisture content (%)

Atterberg Limits Bulk Unit Wt (kN/m3)

LL (%)

PL (%)

PI

BH1 1.00～1.50 CHW Breccia 42.0 76.0 38.0 17 3.00～3.50 CHW Breccia 44.0 68.0 42.0 16

BH3 1.00～1.50 Colluvium 59.0 90.0 37.0 2.50～3.00 Colluvium 63.0 95.0 33.0

BH4 3.00～3.50 Colluvium 38.0 68.0 36.0 4.00～4.50 CHW Breccia 43.0 65.0 31.0

12.56～15.00 Alluvium 16.0 79.0 40.0

BH5 3.00～3.50 Colluvium 59.2 16.24 5.00～5.50 Colluvium 68.7 16.02 5.50～6.00 Colluvium 58.0 94.0 32.0

BH6 2.50～3.00 Colluvium 42.0 72.0 28.0 18 4.50～5.00 Colluvium 56.0 102.0 33.0 21 16.88

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-22

Table 3.3.12 Results of Physical Test (source: JET)

Trial Pit

Depth (m) Geology Natural

Moisture content (%)

Atterberg Limits Linear

ShrinkageLL (%)

PL (%)

PI

Tp1 1.40 C/HWB 46.6 96.1 37.0 22.5 59.1 Tp3 2.00 HWB 38.4 62.5 33.1 16.4 29.4 Tp4 1.50 Clay 49.2 91.8 47.4 20.7 44.4 Tp5 3.00 Clay/Colluvium 37.2 69.3 34.3 19.6 35.0

Tp6 1.00～1.50 Clay/Colluvium 56.1 75.0 46.2 18.6 28.8 1.50～1.80 Clay/Colluvium 24.8 102.4 64.5 23.2 37.9

Table 3.3.13 Results of Triaxial Compression (source: JET)

Drilling No.

Depth (m)

Geology

Moisture content (%)

Before consolidation Shear strength parameters Bulk.U.

Wt (kN/m3)

Dry.U. Wt

(kN/m3) Before AfterC1

(kN/m2) φ1 (°)

BH5 3.0～ 3.5

Colluvium 50.2 49.7 18.7 12.5 0.4 1.4

d. Results of the Laboratory Soil Test

The laboratory soil test results of this investigation are shown in Table 3.3.14.

Test items were to target physical testing, and the target layer of the tests was mainly surface layer colluvium. Mechanical tests could not be conducted because the soil contained too much gravel.

Table 3.3.14 List of Laboratory Soil Tests (source: JET)

Item No Description of Test Quantity

Chitrakoot Quatre Soeurs 1 Specific gravity 6 2 2 Natural moisture content 6 2 3 Atterberg limits 4 2 4 Particle size distribution 6 2 5 Bulk density 2 1

d.1 Chitrakoot

The particle size distribution in colluvial soil was highest for fines, followed by gravel and sand. If the soil is common inorganic matter, the soil particle density will measure 2.6～2.8g/cm3. Past soil test results were also mainly in this value range. The values of the test conducted this time were in the 2.0 ～3.0g/cm3 range, a somewhat large variation.

Natural moisture content tends to be higher in fines and lower in course-grained soil. Test values were largely around 50% and correspond to those of soft clay, affected by the high degree of fine particle fraction content. Values are a slightly high compared to past soil test results.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-23

The Atterberg limit is the collective term for the liquid limit, plastic limit and shrinkage limit. The deformation characteristics of clay change depending on its water content, and the water content standards are divided into 4 classifications as shown in Figure 3.3.14. The liquid limit for samples BH-C5 and BH-C4 was high and plasticity index large compared to other samples.

Figure 3.3.14 Atterberg Limits11

The density test was for only 2 samples, and the results were 1.60g/cm3 and 1.80g/cm3. These were almost the same values as in past soil tests, and the sample with high density had a high content of gravel.

The test results are charted below.

Table 3.3.15 Results of Physical Test(1) (source: JET)

Borehole Depth (m) Geology Particle size distribution (%) Sample

Type Fines Sand Gravel Cobbles

BH-C1 3.00～3.45 Colluvia 43.0 15.0 42.0 0 STP20

BH-C2 4.80～5.25 Colluvia 52.7 10.3 37.0 0 U2

BH-C3 6.60～7.05 Colluvia 70.0 29.0 1.0 0 U2

BH-C4 6.35～6.80 Colluvia 65.0 10.0 25.0 0 SPT28

BH-C5 4.25～4.70 Colluvia 97.0 4.0 3.0 0 SPT56

BH-C6 5.30～5.75 Colluvia 77.6 18.9 3.5 0 SPT25

Table 3.3.16 Results of Physical Test(2) (source: JET)

Borehole Depth (m) Particle density (g/cm3)

Moisture content (%)

Atterberg Limits Bulk density (g/m3)

LL (%)

PL (%)

PI

BH-C1 3.00～3.45 1.94 50.0

BH-C2 4.80～5.25 2.98 51.2 78.0 42.9 35.1 1.80

BH-C3 6.60～7.05 2.57 43.8 73.0 45.1 27.9 1.60

BH-C4 6.35～6.80 2.98 61.8 89.5 45.0 44.5

BH-C5 4.25～4.70 2.67 47.7 110.5 41.7 68.8

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-24

BH-C6 5.30～5.75 2.10 41.3

d.2 Quatre Soeurs

The tests targeted colluvium and hard silty clay.

Particle size characteristics of the colluvial soil indicated that fines content was highest followed by gravel content. On the other hand, silty clay had a high content of gravel followed by fines.

If the soil is common inorganic matter, the soil particle density will measure 2.6～2.8g/cm3. Test results for both samples were around 2.90g/cm3, indicating the possibility they contain a high-density mineral.

Natural moisture content tends to be higher in fines and lower in course-grained soil. Natural moisture content in colluvium was 56% and over 100% in silty clay, affected by the high degree of fine particle fraction content. It was particularly high for silty clay because the sampling depth was deep and it was in a saturated state.

No major differences could be seen in the Atterberg limits for samples BH-Q1 and BH-Q2.

A density test was only conducted for one sample of silty clay, and its result was 1.58g/cm3. This is a slightly lower value than for cohesive soil.

Test results are shown below.

Table 3.3.17 Results of Physical Test (1) (source: JET)

Borehole Depth (m) Geology Particle size distribution (%) Sample

Type Fines Sand Gravel Cobbles

BH-Q1 1.00～1.45 Colluvia 70.0 10.0 20.0 0 STP10

BH-Q2 9.00～9.40 Silty Clay 35.5 8.5 52.0 0 U2

Table 3.3.18 Results of Physical Test (2) (source: JET)

Borehole Depth (m) Particle density (g/cm3)

Moisture content (%)

Atterberg Limits Bulk density (g/m3)

LL (%)

PL (%)

PI

BH-Q1 1.00～1.45 2.98 55.8 88.0 34.17 53.83 －

BH-Q2 9.00～9.40 2.83

105.6 86.5 35.0 51.5 1.58

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-25

e. Ring Shear Test Result by this Project

e.1 Outline of ring shear test

The soil sample supplied for the ring shear test was sampled while disturbed from 0.5-2.0m under the ground with a shovel and a pick for the colluvial deposit in each landslide.

After sampling, the soil samples were sealed in heat resistant polyethylene bag, and transported to Japan by airmail.

Moreover, the high-pressure sterilization processing was executed in Yokohama Plant Quarantine Stations when importing it, and transported to the laboratory.

The location where the soil samples taken and the situation photograph of the sampling are shown below.

Figure 3.3.15 Sampling Location (Chitrakoot) (source:JET)

Sampling location

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-26

Figure 3.3.16 Sampling Location (Quatre Soeurs) (source:JET)

Figure 3.3.17 Sampling Location (Vallee Pitot) (source:JET)

Sampling location

Sampling location

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-27

Photo 3.3.6 Sampling Situation Photo 3.3.7 Samples

e.2 Outline of ring shear test

Ring shear apparatus is classified as direct shear type as well as the direct shear testing apparatus.

However, the ring shear apparatus is a testing machine that can infinitely measure the shear displacement while giving the same strain doing rotational shear by differing from direct shearing apparatus.

As a result, it is possible to obtain the residual strength of clay as shown in the Figure 3.3.18.

Figure 3.3.19(a) shows stress-strain curve in the drain shearing test by some vertical stress σ'.

Moreover, Figure 3.3.19(b) shows that the peak strength and the residual strength are estimated by using the linear regression of shear stress under the different vertical load.

In a word, the shearing test of the past was limited to the measurement of peak strength (overconsolidated clay) and complete softening strength (normally-consolidated clay) by restricting the shear displacement.

However, the ring shear test enabled the measurement of the residual strength that was not able to be measured by canceling displacement shortage so far.

Figure 3.3.18 Difference between Direct Shearing Test and Ring Shear Test (source:JET)

σ

σ

ττ

せん断応力Ｓ

垂直応力Ｎ

（ａ）一面せん断試験のせん断機構

ﾄﾞｰﾅﾂ型供試体

回転せん断

垂直応力Ｎ

（ｂ）リングせん断試験のせん断機構

Normal stress N

Doughnut type test piece

Rotational shear

(a) Shear mechanism of One shearing test

(b) Shear mechanism of Ring shearing test

Shear stress S

Normal stress N

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-28

Figure 3.3.19 Shearing Characteristic of Normally-Consolidated Clay and Overconsolidated Clay12

e.3 Test equipment

Figure3.3.20 shows structural drawing of the ring shear apparatus (main body part), Figure 3.3.21shows rough sketch of the test specimen.

Vertical pressure meter

Jack-up of upper shear ring

Load cell for wall frictionmeasurement

Vertical pressure adjustment valve

Spherical coordinates joint

Vertical displacement sensor

Equilibrium pressure regulator

Equilibrium pressure meter

Shearing box

Detector sensor of angle

Load cell for shearing torquemeasurement

Shearing manual operation

Change gear

Control box

Vertical load beroff lamb cylinder

Figure 3.3.21 Test Specimen Rough Sketch13

e.4 Test method

The process of the ring shear test (the grain diameter sample of 0.425mm or less) is shown in Figure 3.3.22.

A vertical stress is changed to 300→250→200→150→100→50kPa after the residual

Shear surface

Shearstress

Displacement Effective pressure on shear plane

c'

0・

σ'

残留強度

過圧密ピーク強度

正規圧密ピーク強度

完全軟化強度

過圧密ピーク強度

σ' constant

正規圧密ピーク強度

残留強度

0

(a) (b)

Residual strength

Overconsolidationpeak strength

Overconsolidationpeak strength

Residual strengt

Nomal consolidationpeak strength

Nomal consolidationpeak strength

Fully softened strength

Figure 3.3.20 Structural Drawing of the

Ring Shear Apparatus (source:JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-29

strength was confirmed, and strength parameter (cr', φr’) of the residual strength was determined.

Figure 3.3.22 Examination Process of Ring Shear Test (source: JET)

e.5 Test condition

Number of ring shear tests ･････Three samples (for each test specimen) Size of test specimen ･････150mm in outside diameter, 100mm in inside

diameter, and 20mm in thickness Shear velocity ･････0.02 mm/min Amount of the final displacement ･････360° or more Test load ･････300kPa [After confirming the residual

strength,300→250→200→150→100→50kPa] Consolidation condition ･････Normal consolidation（OCR=1.0） Drain condition ･････Consolidated-drained test (CD test)

e.6 Test outcome and observations

Data of test and diagram of stress path where strength parameter is decided are included in the data sheet. Stress path diagram, which is determined the test data and strength parameters are also included in the data sheet. Table 3.3.19 shows ring shear test.

The test load is loaded and consolidation is commenced. Consolidation is completed by 3t method.

Sampling

Sample adjustment

Preload

Sample molding

Consolidation

Shearing

240kPa (7days)

300kPa

Sampling of disturbed soil

The coarse-grained fraction is removed using 0.425mm bolter sieve after the sample is dissolved in water. The sample is dried to remove the water content so that remixing is possible using a constant temperature drying oven (60°).

Pre-consolidation is conducted for the 80 percent of the test load. When a set time passes, consolidation is ended.

A disk shaped sample that completed pre- consolidation is set into the apparatus. After setting, it hollows to the doughnut shape and is molded into this shape.

Sample is sheared 360° or more. After the residual status is confirmed, unload the test load by 50kPa step-by-step.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-30

Table 3.3.19 Ring Shear Test Result (source:JET)

Location of sample Sample name

Residual cohesionCr’（kPa）

Residual shearing resistance angle

Φr’(°)

Chitrakoot S-1 18.7 11.8

Quatre Soeurs S-2 5.7 12.2

Vallee Pitot S-3 3.5 6.4

Residual shear resistance angle φr 'of Chitrakoot and Quatre Soeurs was 11.8°, and 12.2°. φr 'of Vallee Pitot was 6.4°.

The type of soil of Vallee Pitot is clayey compared with Chitrakoot and Quatre Soeur, and has the possibility of including clay minerals etc. Residual cohesion Cr ' values have the possibility of being too high due to the test condition and influence of friction with the apparatus.

In an actual landslide stability analysis, estimation error of the slip surface shape and groundwater conditions and the influence of the resistance of the landslide periphery (edge effect) etc., and various uncertain data can exist. Therefore, it is preferable to adopt shear resistance angle φ' and to adopt c' according to back calculation. Apparently, it is proposed to add the effects of these uncertainties in to the backcalculated c '.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-31

3.3.3 Water Quality Analysis

The purpose of the water quality analysis is to identify the distribution of groundwater in the survey area and to define the groundwater system (streaklines) as part of the landslide survey.

a. Survey Method

A total of 17 water quality analysis samples were collected from the following sites in two districts (Chitrakoot and Quatre Soeurs) in the survey area. The samplings were carried out at Chitrakoot on the end of March 2013 and at Quatre Soeurs. Table 3.3.20 shows the status of sampling for water quality analysis.

Table 3.3.20 Status of Sampling for Water Quality Testing (source: JET)

Location of the water sample Water temperature (℃)

Situation

Cht

rako

ot

BH-C1 23 Borehole BH-C3 25 Borehole BH-C4 26 Borehole BH-C5 27 Borehole

BBP(13) 24 Existing Borehole BBP(6) 25 Existing Borehole

BBP(11) 24 Existing Borehole P-C1 28 Surface Water (pond) R-C1 24 Surface Water (stream) R-C2 23 Surface Water (stream)

Qua

tre

Soe

urs

BH-Q1 29 Borehole BH-Q2 27 Borehole BH-2 27 Existing Borehole BH-3 28 Existing Borehole BH-4 29 Existing Borehole BH-5 26 Existing Borehole RQ-1 28 Surface Water (stream)

The borehole samples will be collected using a water trap (bailer) lowered into the borehole. The existing water source (mountain runoff) samples will be collected using a plastic bucket. The samples will be immediately transferred to polyethylene bottles and taken back to the laboratory.

b. Water Quality Analysis

The water quality analysis items are the major dissolved components of ordinary groundwater and surface water. Table 3.3.21 shows the analysis method for each item.

Table 3.3.21 Water Quality Test Method (source: JET)

Item Unit Method

Water Temperature - ℃ Thermometer

Total Hardness - mg/l Titration

Calcium Hardness mg/l Titration

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-32

Magnesium Hardness mg/l Titration

Phenolphthalein alkalinity mg/l Titration

Methyl Orange Alkalinity mg/l Titration

Chloride ion Cl mg/l Titration/Ion chromatography

Sulfate ion SO4 mg/l Spectrophotometry/Ion chromatography

Silicic acid (Silica) SiO2 mg/l Spectrophotometry

Sodium Na mg/l Atomic absorption spectrophotometry

Potassium K mg/l Atomic absorption spectrophotometry

c. Groundwater Analysis Method by Water Quality Analysis

To ascertain the groundwater system (streaklines) by water quality analysis, the analysis results for the major dissolved components will be arranged by graphic representation of the analysis values. More precisely, the water types will be classified using the trilinear diagram and then plotted on the geological cross-section and a hexadiagram created, and changes in the water composition will be analyzed.

c.1 Hexadiagram

Taking the meq/L concentrations provided on each side of the vertical axis as the axis, the cations will be plotted on the left side and anions on the right side, and the points will be joined with straight lines to describe a hexagonal-shaped diagram (see Figure. 3.3.23). The groundwater system categories and changes in water quality accompanying groundwater motion will be analyzed according to the shape of the diagram. The broad shape on each side of the hexadiagram shows a high concentration of the component while the narrower shape represents a lower concentration. Thus the fact that there are many dissolved components in the groundwater means that the groundwater has been flowing for a long time.

Figure 3.3.23 Example of Hexadiagram (source: JET)

c.2 Results of analysis

The results of analysis by hexadiagram are as follows.

Chitrakoot

The amounts of major dissolved components in the groundwater were low at all sites. The component composition in the groundwater is about the same as that in surface water. The water temperature in the groundwater was high more than 23 ºC at all sites.

(meq/1)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-33

Quatre Soeurs

The amounts of major dissolved components in the groundwater were low at these sites except for BH-4. The component composition in the groundwater is about the same as that in surface water. The water temperature in the groundwater was high more than 28 ºC at all sites. The water quality at BH-4 was high with sodium and chloride ions. It was indicated that the groundwater was contaminated with the sea water.

From these results, it was considered that the groundwater associated with the landslide action was the shallow groundwater and interlocked with rainfall.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-34

Figure 3.3.24 Hexadiagram in the Groundwater at Chitrakoot (source: JET)

Figure 3.3.25 Hexadiagram in the Groundwater at Quatre Soeurs (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-35

3.4 Monitoring

3.4.1 Installation of Monitoring Devices

Landslide monitoring using various instruments is ongoing in order to monitor movements of the landslides and surrounding environment such as groundwater and precipitation.

Main purposes of the monitoring works are;- - To estimate the landslide properties such as size, depth, activity and cause. - Early warning

The monitoring works are in the following areas. Chitrakoot Quatre Soeurs Vallee Pitot The instruments for the landslide monitoring are shown in the table below.

Table 3.4.1 Instruments for the Landslide Monitoring (source: JET)

Instrument Purpose Sensor Logger Manufacturer Location of installation

Extensometer

Displacement of the ground surface (distance between two points),

SLG-100 (Installed in the sensor, 1 hour interval)

Osashi Technos

Chitrakoot, Quatre Soeurs, Vallee Pitot

Laser distance meter

Displacement of the ground surface (distance between two points)

DIST D3aBT

(Manual operation, once a month)

Leica Quatre Soeurs

Inclinometer

Displacement of the subsurface (lateral displacement from the deepest point)

KB-10HCTC-32K (once a month)

Tokyo Sokki Kenkyujo

Chitrakoot

Strain gauge Deformation of the earth (distortion in the ground)

SKF-6070TCR-25 (once a month)

Tokyo Denki Chitrakoot, Quatre Soeurs

Automatic Piezomete

Fluctuation of the groundwater level (variation of water pressure)

DS-1 WLG-01 (1 hour interval)

Osashi Technos

Chitrakoot, Quatre Soeurs

Water level meter

Groundwater level (distance between the surface and the ground water level)

(Manual Operation, once a month)

Quatre Soeurs

Rain gauge Precipitation RS-2 Net LG-201E (1 hour interval)

Osashi Technos

Chitrakoot, Quatre Soeurs

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-36

Extensometer

To Monitor expansion and contraction of a wire

Laser distance meter (manual operation)

To monitor a fixed point and a target (structure such as house wall)

Inclinometer, Strain Gauges

To monitor deformation of vertical pipes installed in the ground

Piezometer

To monitor the water pressure in a borehole

Figure 3.4.1 Basic Landslide Monitoring Techniques (source: JET)

Boreholes Piezometer BH-C1 Extensometer E-C1

Inclinometer BH-C2 Extensometer E-1Piezometer BH-C3 Extensometer E-2Strain Gauges BH-C4 Extensometer E-5Strain Gauges BH-C5 total 4Inclinometer BH-C6 Rain Gauge R-C1

total 6 total 1

Figure 3.4.2 Plan of Instrument Installation – Chitrakoot (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-37

Boreholes Strain Gauges BH-Q1 Extensometer (laser) E-Q1 Strain Gauges BH-Q2 Extensometer (laser) E-Q2 Piezometer BH-5 (existing) Total 2 Groundwater level BH-2 (existing) Rain Gauge R-Q1 Groundwater level BH-3 (existing) Total 1 Groundwater level BH-4 (existing) total 6

- One rain gauge is installed out of the map

Figure 3.4.3 Plan of Instrument Installation – Quatre Soeurs (source: JET)

Extensometer E-V1Extensometer E-V2 Total 2

Figure 3.4.4 Plan of Instrument Installation – Vallee Pitot (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-38

3.4.2 Monitoring Results

a. Chitrakoot

a.1 Rain gauge

A rain gauge is installed at south west of the landslide area in Chitrakoot.

During the monitoring period (26th February 2013 to 4th March 2015), much precipitation was recorded in rainy season (November to April). 450.0mm/month as the maximum monthly rainfall in the monitoring period was recorded in December 2014, and the minimum monthly rainfall in the monitoring period was 8.5mm/month recorded in September 2013. There were ten days when daily precipitation exceeded 50mm in the monitoring period.

There were three days when daily precipitation exceeded 100mm/day in the monitoring period, 30th March 2013, 21st March 2014 and 16th December 2014. On 16th December 2014, 133.0mm of rainfall within six hours and 77mm of maximum hourly precipitation were recorded. On 21st March 2014, 132.0mm/day and 50.0mm/hour were recorded.

The daily precipitation on 20th March 2013 was 106.5mm, and total precipitation of 30th and 31st March was 152.5mm. The maximum hourly precipitation in 30th to 31st was 25.5mm.

Total yearly precipitation of 2014 was 1881.5mm.

Figure 3.4.5 Result of Rain Gauge (source: JET)

Table 3.4.2 Monthly and Maximum Daily Precipitation and Maximum Hourly Precipitation

(source: JET)

2013

Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Monthly precipitation - - 244.5 115.0 35.0 47.5 23.5 65.5 8.5 97.0 233.5 41.0

Maximum daily precipitation - - 106.5 40.5 12.0 15.0 8.5 21.5 4.0 76.0 59.0 18.5

Maximum hourly precipitation - - 26.0 4.5 4.0 7.5 3.0 8.5 1.0 21.0 25.0 9.5

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-39

2014

Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Monthly precipitation 422.5 115.0 234.5 175.5 95.0 26.0 69.0 102.0 57.0 46.5 88.5 450.0

Maximum daily precipitation 83.0 26.5 132.0 74.5 38.0 7.0 17.5 22.0 23.0 23.0 46.0 133.0

Maximum hourly precipitation 29.0 8.5 50.0 25.0 8.5 3.5 14.0 10.0 3.5 8.0 26.0 77.0

2015

Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Monthly precipitation 367.0 116.0 - - - - - - - - - -

Maximum daily precipitation 56.5 28.5 - - - - - - - - - -

Maximum hourly precipitation 30.0 7.0 - - - - - - - - - -

a.2 Extensometer

E(1) is installed at the foot of Chitrakoot landslide area. Compression displacement has continued. This may represent a shallow slide at the location.

Since no deformation on the ground and the house around the location can be found but only small deformation can be seen at the base of the protection cage, the extensometer shows surface creep.

E(2) is installed at the foot of Chitrakoot landslide area. The result shows small compression and small tension alternately.

Since no deformation on the ground can be found and the ground is almost level below the location of the extensometer, the extensometer does not show big landslide. The complicated movement may show two shallow ground movements which move separately as shown Figure 3.4.7. “A” may always move continuously and “B” may move with heavy rain.

E(5) is installed near Chitrakoot Government School in the head of the Chitrakoot landslide area. The result shows small displacement with heavy rain in February, March and April. After May, the displacement was slow. In January 2015, over 100mm of compression deformation was recorded. This was caused by human work during the data collection, not by landslide activities. In January 2015, about 20mm of tension deformation was recorded.

EC-1 is installed in the premises of Chitrakoot Government School. It shows 3mm tension displacement immediately after installation in February, however no deformation can be seen after March. In January 2015, about 15mm of tension are recorded.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-40

Figure 3.4.6 Results of Extensometer (source: JET)

a.3 Inclinometer

BH-C2 is installed at the head of Chitrakoot landslide area. Some deviation can be seen below 13m on the inclinometer graph below. This may be caused by axial compressive stress. This axial compressive stress may show vertical stress in the ground. This phenomenon is often seen at the head of landslide where the vertical stress is distinguished as shown in Figure 3.4.9. The graph variations (showing slope angle changes) may be large at the depths where grouting (sand fill) is not perfect. The slip surface of the landslide at BH-C2 may be at about 15m.

BH-C6 is installed near Chitrakoot Government School. The monitoring could be done only 2 times (January and February 2014), since the bend of the pipe at the depth of 6 m is in excess of permissive range for the sensor to pass through. This shows that the landslide with a 7m deep slip surface is very active.

BH-C2

BH-C6

Figure 3.4.7 Results of Inclinometer (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-41

Figure 3.4.8 Vertical Stress at Head of Landslide (source: JET)

a.4 Strain gauges

BH-C4 is installed at left of center of Chitrakoot landslide area. Small deformations can be seen at 13m, 21m and above 6m deep. These small deformations may not be caused by landslide movement. It must be continued to be watched carefully.

BH-C5 is installed at the foot of Chitrakoot landslide area. There is nothing worthy of special mention in this monitoring.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-42

Figure 3.4.9 Results of Strain Gauges (source: JET)

a.5 Piezometer

Piezometers were installed at BH-C1 and BH-C3. Piezometer at BH-C3 which is the center of Chitrakoot landslide area was shifted to BPP(11) since over 40 m deep of groundwater level at BH-C3 cannot affect a landslide in Chitrakoot.

BH-C1 is located at the head of Chitrakoot landslide. The groundwater level at BH-C1shows a clear tendency to rise in December or January and to drop in June. This seasonal variation in the groundwater level is 2 month behind the rainy season which is around from November to April. This may be because of slow movement of the groundwater in low permeable ground in the area.

The data lost from August to November in 2013 is due to malfunction of the piezometer controller.

BH-(11) is located near Chitrakoot Government School. The groundwater level data were not obtained from the middle of February 2013 to February 2014 because of malfunction of the piezometer sensor which was soaked in the high level groundwater. In February 2013, the groundwater level at BH-(11) rose above the ground surface. After resumption of the monitoring in February 2014, the groundwater level was almost the same level as the ground surface until June 2014. The groundwater level was dropping gradually after June 2014 until November 2014. The groundwater at BH-(11) would have been under enough pressure to force it to the surface in rainy season, since the groundwater was seen gushing out from the

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-43

mouth of the observation hole. The artesian pressure of the groundwater was not able to be confirmed by the piezometer since the water flows out from the mouth of the observation pipe. The groundwater level was probably higher than the ground surface between February to June 2014.

Similarly, there are some other boreholes of which the groundwater level is very high in rainy season in Chitrakoot landslide area.

The groundwater level at BH-C3 was confirmed at about 40m deep in November 2012.

Figure 3.4.10 Results of Piezometer (source: JET)

b. Quatre Soeurs

b.1 Rain gauges

A rain gauge is installed at about 0.5km to the south of Quatre Soeurs landslide.

During the monitoring period (2nd April 2013 to 4th March 2015), much precipitation was recorded in rainy season (November to April). A maximum monthly rainfall of 392.0mm/month in the monitoring period was recorded in January 2015, and the minimum monthly rainfall in the monitoring period was 13.5mm/month recorded in May 2013.

There were seven days when the daily precipitation exceeded 50mm/day in the monitoring period. Daily precipitation exceeding 100mm/day was recorded on only 17th December 2014.

118.5mm of daily precipitation and 58.0mm of hourly precipitation were recorded on 17th December 2014.

98.0mm of daily precipitation was recorded on 21st March 2014, and total continuous precipitation was 117.5mm including the precipitation on 22nd March. It was high intensity rainfall recoding 39.0mm of hourly precipitation.

94.5mm of daily precipitation were recorded on 14th November 2013. It is second heaviest precipitation in the monitoring period. The rainfall was started on 13th November, and total continuous precipitation was 121.5mm. However it was not so high intensity rainfall recoding an hourly precipitation of 19.0mm.

Total yearly precipitation in 2014 was 1541.0mm.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-44

Figure 3.4.11 Result of Rain Gauge (source: JET)

Table 3.4.3 Monthly Precipitation, The Maximum Daily Precipitation and The Maximum

Hourly Precipitation (source: JET)

2013

Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Monthly precipitation - - - 111.0 13.0 38.0 47.5 67.0 25.0 81.5 210.0 92.0

Maximum daily precipitation - - - 26.0 3.5 10.0 15.5 21.0 10.0 48.5 94.5 53.5

Maximum hourly precipitation - - - 7.5 1.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.5 12.0 19.0 23.0

2014

Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Monthly precipitation 304.0 118.0 275.0 116.5 72.0 35.0 54.0 43.0 40.0 98.5 42.5 342.5

Maximum daily precipitation 72.5 21.5 98.0 30.0 17.0 11.0 8.0 8.5 12.0 50.5 16.0 118.5

Maximum hourly precipitation 18.0 4.5 39.0 8.0 9.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 37.0 10.0 58.0

2015

Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Monthly precipitation 392.0 116.0 - - - - - - - - - -

Maximum daily precipitation 65.0 28.5 - - - - - - - - - -

Maximum hourly precipitation 12.0 7.0 - - - - - - - - - -

b.2 Extensometer (laser distance meter)

This extensometer monitoring is manual monitoring measuring distance between two points by a laser distance meter. It was expected that E-Q1 located on the head of the landslide block could be tension and E-Q2 located on the toe of the landslide block could be

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-45

compression.

Both E-Q1 and E-Q2 of which variations were within 10mm do not show remarkable movement. E-Q1 shows tendency of tension in winter and compression in summer. E-Q2 shows similar tendencies but behind E-Q1. These tendencies may be due to deformation of the ground or structures by the variation in temperature.

Figure 3.4.12 Result of Laser Distance Meter (source: JET)

b.3 Strain gauges

BH-Q1 is installed in upper landslide block (Block B). There is nothing worthy of special mention on this monitoring.

BH-Q2 is installed in upper landslide block (Block A). Small deformation can be seen at 2m, 7m and 11m deep. These deformations are not big enough to be determined to be due to landslide activities.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-46

Figure 3.4.13 Results of Strain Gauges (source: JET)

b.4 Piezometers

Piezometer at BH-Q2 which is the center of Block A was shifted to BH5 since the groundwater level is almost equal to the sea level following the tide level and over 13 m deep of the groundwater level at BH-Q2 cannot affect the landslide.

8m deep BH5 which was drilled before the project is located beside BH-Q2 (3m away from BH-Q2). The groundwater level follows the amount of the precipitation. In a day with much precipitation, the groundwater level rises to 0.5m below the ground surface. The base level of the groundwater was around 3.5m deep in rainy season, around 4.0m deep in non-rainy season. The groundwater level recorded by the piezometer at BH-Q2 must be shallow groundwater flowing in shallow permeable layer.

Figure 3.4.14 Groundwater at BH-Q2 (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-47

Figure 3.4.15 Results of Piezometer (source: JET)

b.5 Groundwater monitoring (manual operation)

The groundwater has been monitored once a month with manually operated water level meters at 6 boreholes including two boreholes of strain gauges, BH-Q1 and BH-Q2.

The results are shown in Figure 3.4.16. Some data are missing because the water levels in the boreholes were lower than the borehole bottoms. The groundwater levels are stable at all boreholes except BH-Q1 and BH-3. The water in the boreholes except BH-Q1 and BH3 may be isolated from the groundwater because strainers in the boreholes might be choked with soil. The water level in the borehole of BH-Q1 which may follows actual groundwater level, rose to about 1m deep in February 2013 from 14m deep in dry season.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-48

Figure 3.4.16 Water Level in The Boreholes (source: JET)

c. Vallee Pitot

Two wire extensometers are installed at the head of the landslide area (EV1) and at the toe of the landslide area(EV-2).

EV1 which is installed at the head of the landslide area shows 55 mm of tension movement immediately after the installation. After that, some small tension movements are seen with over 10mm continuous precipitation. After January 2014, the variation in displacement became small within 10mm. The large displacement in December 2013 was because an operator who touched the wire of the extensometer. In January 2015, 60mm of big tension deformation was recorded. This deformation showed the landslide activities which affected on the surrounding houses.

EV2 which is installed at the toe of the landslide area shows compression movement immediately after the installation. However, it changes to tension movement in May and the tension movement continues all the time until September. The tension movement may be caused by partial deformation of the canal which EV2 straddles as shown in Figure 3.4.19. Even a big deformation was recorded at EV1 in January 2015, EV2 did not record big deformation.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-49

Figure 3.4.17 Location of Extensometers (source: JET)

(rain gauge R-C1 is in Chitrakoot)

Figure 3.4.18 Results of Extensometer (source: JET)

Figure 3.4.19 Tension Movement at EV2 (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-50

3.5 Geophysical Exploration

3.5.1 Elastic Wave Exploration

a. Purpose of Investigation

Elastic wave exploration is generally referred to as seismic exploration. Through generation of elastic wave into the ground and measurement of the propagation velocity at the surface, it helps understand properties of geological layers close to the surface. In the landslide investigation, this method is used to estimate the locations of weathered rock layer and the weathering degree, and to obtain the information about strata sequence and the distribution of fault and fracture zone. The exploration results can also be used as the fundamental information for groundwater draining work design. Generally, the measuring lines for elastic wave exploration are set parallel to the motion direction of the landslide, and the dip direction of the strata. The length of the measuring line should be longer than 6-7 times of the exploration depth, and be controlled in 15 times of the designed exploration depth.

b. Quantity and Specifications

Table 3.5.1 shows the specifications of the seismic exploration method and Table 3.5.2 outlines the technical requirements for the survey.

Because the survey area was a residential area, the stacking method by means of hammering was adopted as a survey method. The vibration-receiving point and vibration source point interval were based on the generic value.

The traverse lines in the longitudinal direction of the landslide were designated A-line and those in the transverse direction were designated as B-line and C-line. Due to obstacles and private land along the traverse line, A-line and B-line were subdivided and set. It was possible to set C-line on an almost straight line.

Table 3.5.1 Specifications of the Seismic Exploration (source: JET)

Survey method Seismic exploration according to seismic

refraction method (P wave) Specification Stacking method Shaking method Hammering Vibration-receiving point interval 5 m Vibration source point interval About 30 m

Table 3.5.2 Extent & Specifications of the Seismic Exploration (source: JET)

Traverse line

Description Methodology Traverse line

length (m)

A1-line 8 consecutive seismic lines of 115m each (lines A1-1 to A1-8) The seismic profile crosses next to boreholes BH C1&BH C4

920

A2-line 2 overlapping seismic lines of 115m each (lines A2-1 & A2-2) The seismic profile crosses next to borehole BH C5

230

B1-line 2 consecutive seismic lines of 115m each (lines B1-1 & B1-2) 230 B2A-line 2 overlapping seismic lines of 115m each (lines B2A-1 & B2A-2) 230 B2B-line 1 seismic line of 115m (line B2B) 115 C-line 2 consecutive seismic lines of 115m each (lines C-1 & C-2) 230

Total 1,955

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-51

Figure 3.5.1 Location of Seismic Survey Lines at Chitrakoot (source: JET)

c. Exploration Method

c.1 Principles

In general, the elastic wave velocity is closely associated with geotechnical conditions such as the following factors:

generation age components degree of alteration cracks moisture content

Its velocity value is high in the well-consolidated base rock, however, even though the degree of consolidation is the same, the more cracks and alterations in the base rock, the slower the elastic wave velocity gets.

Based on the principle of the seismic refraction method, a method of elastic wave exploration, observations were made above the ground of how primary wave (P wave) and secondary wave (S wave) of “elastic undulation” travels through the geological stratum either directly or refracted at different boundaries. By understanding the behavior of the waves, it allows us to determine the subsurface structures. Here, elastic undulation or earthquake motions are generated artificially through hammering, crushing powder, etc.

Figure 3.2.1 shows an example of a seismic waveform observed with 24 geophones. The focus of the earthquake was at 28.7m on the traverse line, and geophones are set at 2.5m

GEOPHYICAL INVESTIGATION AT CHITRAKOOT LOCATION OF SEISMIC SURVEY LINES

－ SEISMIC SURVEY LINE ○ Geophone

A1 A2

B2B

B1

B2A C

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-52

intervals. The traverse line length is 57.5m.

Figure 3.5.3 is a conceptual diagram of both the seismic wave travel time of each geophone and the seismic wave path passing through the surface layer. The seismic wave arrives earlier in the geophone closer to the focus, and the difference in travel time of the seismic wave depending upon the stratum can be seen.

Figure 3.5.2 The Seismic Wave Figure 3.5.3 Travel Time Curves and Seismic Paths

(source:JET)

c.2 Equipment and analysis software specifications

The equipment and analysis software to be used in the seismic exploration are listed below.

Table 3.5.3 List of Equipment to be Used (source: JET)

Name Type Specifications Quantity Maker

Digital recorder DAQ INK�

System

High-resolution 24-Bit

∆-Σ A/D Converter 1unit

Seismic Source

Company, USA

Geophone GSR Integrated GPS receiver

2.4GHz Wireless communication24 Pieces

Seismic Source

Company, USA

Analysis software Measurement facility for reflection method DAQ VScope-PC

Other Big hammer

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-53

Figure 3.5.4 DAQ LINK ⅡSystem and Measured Image14

c.3 Observation procedure

Observation procedure is as follows:

Choose position and bearing of traverse line on which exploration is carried

out based on the results of reconnaissance on landslide area

Install the geophones on each survey point while wiring the “takeout cable”

from the end of traverse line to connect them with “takeout cable”.

Install 6 to 7 shot points for each traverse line at predefined points. In the

case of hammering, produce vibration by hitting the iron plate placed on the

ground with a hammer and the time will be transmitted to the body of

recorder from the hammer switch attached to the hammer.

Adjust the noise with amplifier so as to minimize the noise due to the traffic

vibration, wind and the like by means of elastic wave survey instrument.

Instructions will be given from the measurement headquarter on a timely

basis to produce vibration in each shot point to record its vibration-receiving

waveform.

Repeat these tasks (Spread→Producing vibration→Measurement) in sequence as described above to complete the measurement of one spread. Perform the same series of tasks on other traverse lines as well to complete the measuring of all traverse lines.

Figure 3.5.5 Observation Procedure and Diagram of Observation (source: JET)

Selecting the traverse line

Spread work (install the geophones)

Measuring

Installing the shot points

Extension cable

shot mark

Hammer switch

Hammering

Takeout cable

Iron plate

Digital data

recorder

Junction line

Geophone

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-54

d. Analysis Method

Analysis is conducted with a method using travel-time curve. Arrival time (travel-time) of initial motion of the elastic wave from shot point to each vibration-receiving point (sample rate / sampling interval 500 μs) is read from measurement records in units of 1/1000 seconds to create the travel-time curve.

Shape of travel-time curve reflects the velocity structures, equivalent of velocity distributions of the underground. Gradient of travel-time curve represents the amplitude of apparent elastic wave velocity (the smaller the gradient of curve is, the bigger the velocity value is). The range of same layers that appear on the travel-time velocity varies corresponding to the layer thickness of said velocity layer. This change in the travel-time curve allows the velocity structure to be estimated by means of analysis.

Major analysis methods of travel-time curve include two methods: Hagiwara’s peel off method (Peel off method) most-commonly used in a conventional civil engineering geological survey and a tomographic analysis method (hereinafter referred to as “tomographic method”) developed in recent years. While the peel off method reflects layered subsurface structures well, the tomographic method is suitable for block-like structures (matrix structure) and structures where the velocity varies gradually and the like. Table 3.5.4 shows major differences and characteristics of two analysis methods.

Our analysis used “Hagiwara’s peel off method” to seek the velocity structure.

Table 3.5.4 Comparison between Peel Off and Tomographic Methods (source: JET)

Item Peel 0ff Method

(Hagiwara’s Method) Tomographic Method

Class of elastic wave

Direct wave + Refracted wave Direct wave + Refracted wave +

Transparent wave

Con

stra

ints

of

velo

city

st

ruct

ure

Structure

Assuming that the greater the depth is, the bigger the velocity value becomes.

Essentially, same as the “peel off method”. Stereological measurement enables the detection of velocity-inversion layer as well.

Velocity value

Same velocity in one layer Same velocity in one lattice

How the elastic wave propagates

Elastic wave propagates at the velocity of lower layer along layer boundary (critical refracted wave)

Elastic wave propagates while transmitting in each lattice at the unique velocity in each lattice.

Effects attributable to the terrain and irregularity at velocity boundary surface

Great Apparent high velocity at convex portion Apparent low velocity at concave portion

Small

Features

• Suitable for layer structures including sedimentary layers.

• Suitable for the zoning (large classification) of weathered zones.

• Suitable for block-like and pulse-like structures including eruptive rock and faults in addition to hard-and-soft alternate layers.

• Since it is easy to capture slight changes in velocity, detailed interpretation is available.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-55

e. Results of Exploration

e.1 Interpretation

The velocity is read from the data obtained in the measurements, and a travel-time curve is created and analyzed with the peel off method. An elastic wave velocity structure diagram is then created. When the travel-time curve is being made, care must be taken that there is parallelism of the travel-time curve as well as congruity between 2-way velocities and between intercept times. With the peel off method, the elastic wave velocity and velocity boundaries are found based on the travel-time curve.

Below is a typical example (A1-1 Line) of a travel-time curve and velocity structure diagram created according to seismic exploration.

Figure 3.5.6 Travel-time Curve of A1-1 Line (source: JET)

Figure 3.5.7 Analytical Diagram of Velocity Profile of A1-1 Line (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-56

e.2 Conclusion

Table 3.5.5 shows the elastic wave velocity obtained from the seismic exploration and its relation to presumed stratum and thickness. In addition, the velocity structure diagrams for each traverse line are shown in Figure 3.5.8～Figure 3.5.13.

The velocity structure is generally categorized into 2～3 strata, and the surface stratum is presumed to be colluvium with an elastic wave velocity of less than about 500m/s. The stratum thickness is less than about 20m and distributed uniformly throughout the entire survey area.

The elastic wave velocity of the base rock shows a value of 1700m/s～3900m/s, more than three times the surface stratum velocity. The variation in velocity in hard base rock composed of basalt is attributed to the prevalence of fractures and cracks inherent in basalt.

The state and hardness of the core of the colluvium and basalt clearly differ, resulting in a difference between the elastic wave velocities for the two.

Table 3.5.5 Summary Table of the Various Strata Identified (source: JET)

Traverse line

Thickness (m)

Seismic velocity (m/s)

A1-line

-Gravelly silty clay/ colluvium & Highly to completely weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 3 to 15m

310 to 790

-Moderately to slightly weathered basalt/ agglomerate: from 12m deep

1742 to 2343

A2-line -Gravelly silty clay/ colluvium:0 to 7m 346 to 463

-Highly to moderate weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 4 to 12m 878 to 1320 -Slightly weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 7 to 10m 3722 to 3843

B1-line -Gravelly silty clay/ colluvium & Highly to completely weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 5 to 15m

442 to 484

-Slightly weathered basalt/ agglomerate: from 15m deep 2283 to 2285

B2A-line -Gravelly silty clay/ colluvium: 5 to 8m 389 to 393 -Highly to moderate weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 7 to 20m 1033 to 1201 -Slightly weathered basalt/ agglomerate: from 20m deep, 2568 to 3630

B2B-line

-Gravelly silty clay/ colluvium & Highly to completely weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 9 to 19m

472

-Moderately to slightly weathered basalt/ agglomerate: from 15m deep

1998

C-line

-Gravelly silty clay/ colluvium & Highly to completely weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 4 to 15m

443 to 492

-Moderately to slightly weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 10 to 15m

2154 to 2174

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-57

Figure 3.5.8 Seismic Velocity Section (A1-line) (source: JET)

Figure 3.5.9 Seismic Velocity Section (A2-line) (source: JET)

Figure 3.5.10 Seismic Velocity Section (B1-line) (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-58

Figure 3.5.11 Seismic Velocity Section (B2A-line) (source: JET)

Figure 3.5.12 Seismic Velocity Section (B2B-line) (source: JET)

Figure 3.5.13 Seismic Velocity Section (C-line) (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-59

3.5.2 Two-Dimensional Resistivity Exploration

a. Purpose of Investigation

In an electrical resistivity, direct current is applied to the ground. Resistivity exploration is to measure generated electrical potential and to estimate the resistivity distribution under the ground. Because the electrical behavior varies by rock composition, type and geological condition, groundwater properties and geological structures can be estimated through the measurement of the electrical resistivity under the ground.

During landslide investigation, based on the two dimensional distribution of the electrical resistivity, the weathered layer, bedrock, permeable layers and their continuity, existing situation of the faults and their continuity under the landslide slope can be estimated. The results can be used as fundamental information for the design of groundwater drainage.

In the two dimensional resistivity exploration, high density electrical potential is measured by placing electrodes at 5m intervals. Then through inverse analysis on a computer using the obtained electrical potential data, resistivity distribution is determined.

b. Quantity and Specifications

Figure 3.5.6 outlines the technical requirements for the survey.

The commonly used pole-pole array was adopted as the exploration method. Setting of the traverse lines is basically the same as for the seismic exploration, however the length of the fully extended traverse lines is slightly shorter than that for the seismic exploration.

Table 3.5.6 Specifications of Two-dimensional Resistivity Exploration (source: JET)

Survey method Technical requirements for the survey Electrode interval 5m Maximum depth measured 40m

Table 3.5.7 Extent & Specifications of the Resistivity Exploration (source: JET)

Traverse line

Description Methodology Traverse line

length (m)

A1-line Strings of 72 electrodes, spaged5m+6roll-along of 18 electrodes. Sequence of measurement of 3,598 quadripoles Typical depth of investigation: 40m

900

A2-line Strings of 36 electrodes, spaced 5m Sequence of measurement of 306 quadripoles Typical depth of investigation: 30m

175

B1-line Strings of 60 electrodes, spaced 5m Sequence of measurement of 8,528 quadripoles Typical depth of investigation: 40m

295

B2A-line Strings of 36 electrodes, spaced 5m Sequence of measurement of 306 quadripoles Typical depth of investigation: 35m

175

B2B-line Strings of 30 electrodes, spaced 5m Sequence of measure of 207 quadripoles Typical depth of investigation: 30m

145

C-line Strings of 48 electrodes, spaced 5m Sequence of measurement of 562 quadripoles Typical depth of investigation: 40m

235

Total 1,925

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-60

Figure 3.5.14 Location of Resistivity Survey Lines in Chitrakoot (source: JET)

c. Exploration Method

c.1 Principles

In general, the ground resistivity shows the following trends.

The resistivity value of pelitic rocks is small while the value of coarse-grained aggregates of minerals such as granite is large.

The resistivity value of weathered and altered rocks is smaller than that of unweathered rocks with the same geological properties.

The resistivity value decreases as water content increases. The resistivity value of fault and crush zone or altered area is smaller than that of their

peripheries. The resistivity value of gravel layer is larger than that of clay layer.

Although these trends are commonly observed, the ground resistivity generally depends on many factors such as content of conductive minerals (including clay mineral), porosity, water content and saturation, water quality of pore water (resistivity), and temperature. Furthermore, the resistivity simply indicates lithofacies changes in the same geological layer/rock, degree of weathering/hydrothermal alteration, and water content status in many cases in addition to differences in geological layers and rocks.

GEOPHYICAL INVESTIGATION AT CHITRAKOOT LOCATION OF RESISTIVITY SURVEY LINES

－ SEISMIC SURVEY LINE ○ Electrode

A1 A2

B2B

B1

B2A C

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-61

c.2 Equipment and analysis software used

The equipment and analysis software used in two-dimensional resistivity exploration is listed below. ・ SYSCAL R1 PLUS Switch-72 ・ RES2DINV or RESIX-2DI(PC) for pseudo-section inversion to true resistivity (and

IP) 2D section ・ Pole bolt（Stainless-round bar） ・ Electrode cable, battery

Figure 3.5.15 Measuring Equipment (SYSCAL R1 PLUS Switch-72) and Pole Bolt15

c.3 Measurement method

The method is manual measurement by 2-pole method. Figure 3.5.16 shows a circuit where current I is passed through current electrodes C and C∞ to measure the voltage difference V between P and P∞. The apparent resistivity can be obtained from the following equation using the potential theory of semi-infinite medium.

Figure 3.5.16 Electrode Arrays for 2-Pole Method (source: JET)

As shown in Figure 3.5.17, the apparent resistivity is measured with an earth resistivity meter from electrodes installed at predetermined intervals of measurement points through non-inductive cables and an electrode scanner.

However, we will manually measure by moving and applying a pair of electrodes C1 and P1 along the survey lines instead of using an electrode scanner.

= 2a V / I (m)

I V

C C∞ P P∞

a

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-62

Figure 3.5.17 High-Density Electrical Resistivity Exploration Measuring Method (source: JET)

d. Analysis Method

An inverse analysis (inversion) is made using the nonlinear least-squares method to draw a colored sectional view of ground resistivity based on the dataset of measure potential.

Figure 3.5.18 shows a resistivity inversion analysis flow. Procedures for analysis and calculation are as follows.

1) Create an initial model of resistivity distribution using the measured data. 2) Obtain a logical potential based on the resistivity distribution using the finite element

method. 3) Calculate the difference (residual) between the measured potential and the logical

potential. 4) Calculate the logical potential while modifying the initial model so that the residual

becomes minimal. 5) Repeat steps 2) to 4) until the residual converges to gain a final resistivity model.

PC

Earth resistivity meter

Electrode scanner C∞ P∞

C1 P1

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-63

Figure 3.5.18 Resistivity Inversion Analysis Flow (source: JET)

e. Results of Exploration

e.1 Interpretation

Using the potential decay curve and others, abnormal data is extracted and excluded from the data obtained from measurements. Dividing the ground into the elements of small domains, a resistivity model is then created. Analysis utilizes the nonlinear least squares method, and the resistivity value of each block is decided upon through inverse analysis that sequentially modifies the resistivity of each block.

Below is an example of analysis model classification (A1-1 Line) by two-dimensional resistivity exploration.

Measured data

Edit data Create mesh using finite element method

Create initial model

Calculate logical potential

Calculate residual between measured value and

logical value

Residual has converged?

Surveyed data

Modify model

(Nonlinear least-squares method)

(Repeated calculation)

No

Yes

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Plot sectional view

Gain final resistivity model(5)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-64

Figure 3.5.19 Resistivity Sequence of A1-1 Line (source: JET)

e.2 Conclusion

The resistivity values obtained from the two-dimensional resistivity exploration and their relation to the estimated strata and stratum thickness is shown in Table 3.5.8. The resistivity cross sections for each of the traverse lines are shown in Figure 3.5.20～Figure 3.5.24.

The resistivity distribution is generally divided over 2～3 strata, and the surface layer is estimated to be colluvium of less than about 50ohm.m. The stratum thickness is less than about 20m and distributed uniformly over the entire survey area. Also, a fall in resistivity is observed in 3 places on the A1-line, indicating a weathered zone or groundwater flow.

Compared to the resistivity of the surface layer, that of the base rock was high at a value of 50～1000ohm.m or more than 1000ohm.m. The hard rock base is made up of basalt, and the basalt is presumed to have an effect on the resistivity value.

As with the seismic exploration results, there was a clear difference between colluvium and basalt in the results. The fall in resistivity observed on the A1-line should also be verified from observation data such as groundwater levels.

Table 3.5.8 Summary Table of the Various Strata Identified (source: JET)

Traverse line

Thickness (m)

Resistivity (ohm.m)

A1-line

-Gravelly silty clay/ colluvium & Highly to completely weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 3 to 15m

0 to 50

-Moderately to slightly weathered basalt/ agglomerate: from 12m deep, encountered on a depth of 35m

50 to 1000

A2-line

-Gravelly silty clay/ colluvium:0 to 7m with pockets at 15m at the end of the survey line

0 to 10

-Highly to moderate weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 4 to 12m 10 to 150 -Slightly weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 7 to 10m 150 to 1000

-Fractured basalt: from 22m deep, encountered on a depth of 15m >1000

B1-line -Gravelly silty clay/ colluvium & Highly to completely weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 5 to 15m

0 to 50

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-65

-Slightly weathered basalt/ agglomerate: from 15m deep, encountered on a depth of 15m

150 to 1000

B2A-line

-Gravelly silty clay/ colluvium: 5 to 8m 0 to 10 -Highly to moderate weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 7 to 20m 10 to 50 -Slightly weathered basalt/ agglomerate: from 20m deep, encountered on a depth of 17m

150 to 1000

B2B-line

-Gravelly silty clay/ colluvium & Highly to completely weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 9 to 19m

0 to 50

-Moderately to slightly weathered basalt/ agglomerate: from 15m deep, encountered on a depth of 15m

50 to 1000

C-line

-Gravelly silty clay/ colluvium & Highly to completely weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 4 to 15m

0 to 50

-Moderately to slightly weathered basalt/ agglomerate: 10 to 15m 50 to 1000 -Fractured basalt: from 27m deep, encountered on a depth of 15m to 20m

>1000

Figure 3.5.20 Resistivity Pseudosection (A1-line) according to Inverse Analysis (source: JET)

Figure 3.5.21 Resistivity Pseudosection (A2-line) according to Inverse Analysis (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-66

Figure 3.5.22 Resistivity Pseudosection (B1-line) according to Inverse Analysis (source: JET)

Figure 3.5.23 Resistivity Pseudosection (B2A-line) according to Inverse Analysis (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-67

Figure 3.5.24 Resistivity Pseudosection (B2B-line) according to Inverse Analysis(source:JET)

Figure 3.5.25 Resistivity Pseudosection (C-line) according to Inverse Analysis (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-68

3.6 Drilling Survey

3.6.1 Drilling Plan

A drilling survey is conducted by extracting direct core from the ground in order to ascertain the slip plane surface, geological features, and geological structure. For this project all core sampling was conducted with a core diameter of 76～101mm.

a. Field Drilling Schedule

The drilling process in Chitrakoot and Quatre Soeurs is explained below.

a.1 Chitrakoot

The drilling of boreholes BH-C3～BH-C6 commenced at the end of October and was completed in mid-November. Because it took time to verify the landowners, drilling on boreholes BH-C1 and BH-C2 commenced in the beginning of December and was completed in mid-December. The drilling process ended up finishing 2.5 months behind schedule.

The duration of each drilling survey was less than one week.

Table 3.6.1 Field Drilling Schedule (Chitrakoot) (source: JET)

a.2 Quatre Soeurs

Work commenced in the beginning of October 2012 and was completed mid-October. Drilling took 4 days.

Table 3.6.2 Field Drilling Schedule (Quatre Soeurs) (source: JET)

b. Quantity and Location

b.1 Chitrakoot

Details of the drilling survey can be seen in Table 3.6.3. Survey and monitoring locations are

Depth(m) 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30

BH-C1 48.86 Piezometer

BH-C2 50.0 Inclinometer

BH-C3 50.0 -

BH-C4 30.0 Pipe strain gauge

BH-C5 30.0 Pipe strain gauge

BH-C6 50.0 Inclinometer

InstallationOctober November December

Borehole

12 16

12 15

4 9

5 8

30 1

23 26

Depth(m) 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30

BH-Q1 21.0 Pipe strain gauge

BH-Q2 21.0 Pipe strain gauge

BoreholeOctober November December

Installation

10 13

2 5

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-69

shown in Figure 3.6.1.

Table 3.6.3 Borehole Details (source: JET)

Borehole Location

Borehole Borehole Diameter

(mm)

Depth (m)

In Situ Test Installation

Chitrakoot

BH-C1 76 48.86 SPT Piezometer

BH-C2 101 50.0 SPT Inclinometer

BH-C3 76 50.0 SPT －

BH-C4 76 30.0 SPT Pipe strain gauge

BH-C5 76 30.0 SPT Pipe strain gauge

BH-C6 101 50.0 SPT Inclinometer

Figure 3.6.1 Survey Locations in Chitrakoot (source: JET)

b.2 Quatre Soeurs

Drilling survey details are listed in Table 3.6.4. Survey and monitoring locations are shown in Figure 3.6.2.

BH-C5 BH-C4

BH-C6

BH-C3

BH-C2

BH-C1

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-70

Table 3.6.4 Borehole Details (source: JET)

Borehole Location

Borehole Borehole Diameter

(mm)

Depth (m)

In Situ Test Installation

Quatre Soeurs

BH-Q1 76 21.0 SPT Pipe strain gauge

BH-Q2 76 21.0 SPT Pipe strain gauge

BH-5(existing) 76 NA NA Piezometer

Figure 3.6.2 Survey locations in Quatre Soeurs (source:JET)

3.6.2 Core Drilling

a. Specifications

The specifications of the drilling machines and materials are as follows.

Table 3.6.5 Specifications of the Drilling Machines and Materials (source: JET)

Drilling equipment APAFOR38 and APAFOR48

Drilling method Rotary coring-T2-101

Core Barrel NMCL Triple Tube

Casing 89mm and 114mm

BH-Q1

BH-Q2

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-71

Drilling machine Tank/ Tank car

Lorry Material storage

Standard penetration test materials Core tube/ Rod

Photo 3.6.1 The Drilling Machines and Materials (source: JET)

b. Evaluation Standards

The evaluation standards of the drilling core are as follows.

b.1 Degree of weathering

The chart below serves as a guide to the degree of base rock weathering. Using it as a reference, stratum classification was carried out for the borehole log.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-72

Table 3.6.6 Rock Mass Weathering16

Descriptive term Fracture condition Surface characteristics Original texture/Grain

condition

Fresh Basalt Closed Unchanged Preserved/tight Slightly weathered

Basalt Discolored and may

contain thin filling Partial discoloration/not

friable Preserved/tight

Moderately Weathered Basalt

Discolored and may contain thin filling

Partial to complete discoloration/not friable except poorly cemented

samples

Preserved/partial opening

Highly weathered Basalt

Discolored and may contain thin to medium

thick filling Friable

Mainly preserved/partial

opening

Completely Weathered Basalt

－ Resembles soil Partly

Preserved/complete separation

b.2 TCR・SCR・RQD

TCR (Total Core Recovery), SCR (Solid Core Recovery), and RQD (Rock Quality Designation) are used as an index to determine the quality of the rock mass. The relation between RQD and degree of base rock quality is as follows.

RQD=（Total length of cores>100mm／Total length of drilling）×100%

Table 3.6.7 Quality Classification of Rocks by RQD Values16

RQD（％） Quality classification of rocks

0 to 25 Very poor

25 to 50 Poor

50 to 75 Fair

75 to 90 Good

90 to 100 Excellent

b.3 Rock Strength・Joint Spacing

The following chart is a guide to the relation between core hardness and core strength.

Table 3.6.8 Strength Description of Rock Material16

Term Field description Indicative unconfined

compressive strength (Mpa)

Very weak Gravel-size lumps can be crushed between finger and thumb.

<1.25

Weak Gravel-size lumps can be broken in half by heavy hand pressure.

1.25 to 5

Moderately weak Only thin slabs, corners or edges can be broken off with heavy hand pressure.

5 to 12.5

Moderately strong When held in the hand, rock can be broken by hammer blows.

12.5 to 50

Strong When resting on a solid surface, rock can be broken by hammer blows.

50 to 100

Very strong Rock chipped by heavy hammer blows. 100 to 200

Extremely strong Rock rings on hammer blows. >200

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-73

The following is a reference for classification of joint discontinuity and spacing.

Table 3.6.9 Classification of Discontinuity Spacing17

Description Joint spacing (m)

Extremely closely spaced <0.02

Very closely spaced 0.02 to 0.06

Closely spaced 0.06 to 0.2

Moderately spaced 0.2 to 0.6

Widely spaced 0.6 to 2

Very widely spaced 2 to 6

Extremely widely spaced >6

3.6.3 Installation of Observation Equipment

Three types of observation equipment were installed at the boreholes: pipe strain gauges, inclinometers, and water level meters.

a. Installation of Pipe Strain Gauge

The pipe strain gauge was installed according to the following procedures.

・ Excavate a borehole to the specified depth and insert pipe strain gauge while connecting it. At that time, match the alignment mark on the surface of the pipe with the direction of landslide movement, being careful the direction doesn’t shift.

・ Thoroughly embed the pipe strain gauge in the bedrock. The depth is specified as 3～5m, but in cases where a base rock slide is conceivable, at least one hole should be excavated and gauge installed more than 10～20m inside the base rock.

・ Strain gauges are generally placed at 1～2m intervals, but if the presence of a slip surface is ascertained with certainty, intervals are less than 1m. Strain gauges in this project were all placed at 1m intervals.

・ The annular space between the borehole walls and the pipes were filled with sand.

・ After pipe strain gauges were embedded, the leads were connected to the data logger.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-74

Table 3.6.10 Specifications of the Pipe Strain Gauge (source: JET)

Materials Type Capability Body of the pipe strain gauge

Code edge VP40

(length: 20m)

VP40 (length: 30m)

System：two gauges in one direction, Strain gauge system Measurement range：±25,000×10-6 strain Strain limit：1×10-6 strain Accuracy：0.5% Operational temperature：-20°～60°C

Adjustment value：±700×10-6 Strain Effective length 1m, filter roll, processed strainer Surplus length of cable 2m, height from the land surface 1m

Installation of the pipe strain gauge Setting of the pipe strain gauge complete

Connection of the data logger Connection of the data logger complete

Setting of the data logger Setting of the protection box

Photo 3.6.2 Installation of the Pipe Strain Gauge (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-75

b. Installation of Borehole Inclinometer

The borehole inclinometer was installed according to the following procedures.

・ Excavate a borehole to the specified depth, and verify the depth of the bedrock.

・ Thoroughly embed the guide pipe in the bedrock. The concept is the same as for the pipe strain gauge.

・ One side of the guide pipe’s guide groove is aligned in the anticipated direction of landslide movement, and the guide pipe is hooked up so that the guide grooves connect smoothly.

・ To avoid occurrence of initial deflection, don’t push with excessive force when inserting the guide pipe. Insert the pipe so that it will extend straight and fix the bottom edge of the guide pipe securely to the bedrock. Gradually fill the space around the guide pipe with sand, and install while compacting,

Below is a description of the equipment used and photos of the installation process.

Table 3.6.11 Specifications of the Special Casing Pipe (Guide Pipe) (source: JET)

Materials Type Materials Type

ABS Guide Pipe Length 2m

ABS Pipe KBF-51-2

ABS Guide Pipe Socket

ABS Pipe Sockets KBF-52

ABS Guide Pipe cap Bottom cap

ABS KBF-54-1

ABS Guide pipe cap Top cap

ABS KBF-54-2

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-76

Special casing pipe (guide pipe) Insertion of the casing pipe

Positioning of the casing pipe Connection of the casing pipe

Setting of the casing pipe completed Setting of the protection box

Photo 3.6.3 Installation of the Casing Pipe (Guide Pipe) (source: JET)

c. Installation of Water Level Meters

Water level meters were installed according to the following procedures.

・ Excavate a borehole to the specified depth, and verify the depth of the groundwater level.

・ Insert screen-processed PVC pipe, and fill the gap between it and the borehole wall with sand.

・ Taking into consideration the expected margin of fluctuation in the groundwater level, determine the installation depth of the hydraulic water level detector.

・ Raise and lower the fixed depth of the piezometer in the water, checking that the change in water pressure corresponding to the changes in depth is being measured.

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-77

Below is a description of the equipment used and photos of the installation process.

Table 3.6.12 Specifications of the Piezometer (source: JET)

Materials Type Capability

DS-1 (Cable

length:20m)DS-1 Cable

length:30m)

Measurement range：0～10m Accuracy of measurement：0.1%FS Temperature characteristic：±0.09%FS/10°CCoverage of temperature：0～30°C Material of body：SUS316L Material of cable：Polyurethane (open air pipe built in) Material of pressure receiver：Hastelloy Size, Weight：φ25×130mm、about 120g

PVC pipe Installation of PVC pipe completed

Installation of water level meter Setting of the data logger

Photo 3.6.4 Installation of Water Level Meter (source: JET)

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-78

3.6.4 Drilling Results

a. Chitrakoot

Drilling results are summarized in the boring logs and core sample photographs and included in the Supporting Report.

The chart below shows the core recovery, solid core recovery and RQD obtained by means of drilling. The strata can be broadly classified into 3 types.

Table 3.6.13 Standard Penetration Test (source: JET)

Borehole Depth

(m) Type

Depth (m)

Thickness(m)

Total core Recovery

(%)

Solid core Recovery

(%)

RQD (%)

BH-C1 48.86

1 5.00 5.00 100 0 0

2 10.15 5.15 100 0-50 0-45

3 48.86 38.71 100 45-100 12-100

BH-C2 50.00

1 8.00 8.00 100 0 0

2 9.70 1.70 100 0 0

3 50.00 40.30 100 14-100 0-100

BH-C3 50.00

1 6.00 6.00 100 0 0

2 15.00 9.00 100 0-43 0-30

3 50.00 35.00 100 80-100 65-100

BH-C4 30.00

1 7.55 7.55 100 0 0

2 15.00 7.45 100 0-77 0-77

3 30.00 15.00 100 82-100 60-100

BH-C5 30.00

1 5.75 5.75 100 0 0

2 16.00 10.25 100 0-56 0-35

3 30.00 14.00 100 65-100 60-100

BH-C 50.00

1 7.00 7.00 100 0 0

2 13.00 6.00 100 0 0

3 50.00 37.00 100 10-100 0-100

Table 3.6.14 Relationship between Strata Classification and Geological Features (source: JET)

Type Geology

1

TOP SOIL, COLLUVIUM, ALLUVIUM: Silty-Clay with occasional Cobbles and Boulders Brown to Dark Brown, Dark Grey Soft to Stiff

2

HIGHLY/HIGHLY TO MODERATELY/HIGHLY TO COMPLETELY WEATHERED BASALT/AGGLOMERATE Brown to Light Brown, Grey Weak/Weak to moderate

3 SLIGHTLY WEATHERED BASALT/AGGLOMERATE Grey/Grey to purplish Grey Strong to Very strong

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-79

b. Quatre Soeurs

Drilling results are summarized in the boring logs and core sample photographs and included in the Supporting Report.

The chart below shows the core recovery, solid core recovery and RQD obtained by means of drilling. The strata can be broadly classified into 5 types.

Table 3.6.15 Standard Penetration Test (source: JET)

Borehole Depth

(m) Type

Depth (m)

Thickness(m)

Total core Recovery

(%)

Solid core Recovery

(%)

RQD (%)

BH-Q1 21.00

2 2.00 2.00 100 0 0

3 7.80 5.80 100 0-33 0-33

5 21.00 13.20 100 44-100 30-100

BH-Q2 21.00 2 18.75 18.75 100 0 0

3 21.00 2.25 100 0-18 0

Table 3.6.16 Relationship between Strata Classification and Geological Features (source: JET)

Type Geology

1 Fill

2 Colluvium

3 HIGHLY WEATHERED BRECCIA/BASALT

4 MODERATELY WEATHERED BRECCIA/BASALT

5 SLIGHTLY WEATHERED BASALT/BRECCIA

3.6.5 Standard Penetration Test

The standard penetration test is conducted to seek the N value in order to determine the hardness, firmness, and soil layer structure of the ground in situ. Test methods are carried out in accordance with BS 1377.

Standards for soil stiffness and consistency are as follows.

Table 3.6.17 Soil Strength Description (source: JET)

Consistency Identification

Very soft Easily molded fingers

Soft Easily penetrated with thumb

Firm Indent by thumb/molded with strong pressure

Stiff Indent by thumb

Very Stiff Penetrated by thumbnail

Hard Penetration by thumbnail difficult

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-80

a. Chitrakoot

The results of the standard penetration tests conducted on each borehole are shown in Table 3.6.18.

Most of the geology tested was colluvium. Almost all had a consistency of “very stiff”, and a small portion was “stiff” or “firm”. A great deal of gravel was contained in the colluvium, and there is a possibility that the gravel blows may have caused an exaggerated N value.

The N value of the surface layer of boreholes BH-C3 and BH-C6 is relatively soft at less than 10. The mixture of gravel is irregular, but shows a tendency to become more prevalent in the deeper parts of the colluvium. Based on the soil test results, the matrix of this stratum is mainly composed of fines, and therefore the N value is expected to decline in regard to cohesive soil containing no gravel.

Table 3.6.18 Standard Penetration Test (source: JET)

Borehole Depth

(m) SPT

level SPT

N value Estimated UCS,kpa

(Jennings and Al,1973)Estimated

Cu,kpa Consistency

BH-C1 48.86 3.00 20 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

BH-C2 50.00

2.20 33 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

3.35 23 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

6.55 21 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

8.00 19 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

BH-C3 50.00

1.00 8 40-80 20-40 Firm

2.55 14 75-150 37-75 Stiff

4.10 16 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

5.45 19 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

8.10 33 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

9.65 41 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

11.51 >51 Possibly cobbles/boulders

BH-C4 30.00

2.55 26 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

5.00 10 75-150 37-75 Stiff

6.35 28 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

8.00 36 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

9.35 34 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

BH-C5 30.00

1.25 >51 Possibly cobbles/boulders

2.80 31 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

4.25 >51 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

5.75 Penetration not possible

Possibly cobbles/boulders

BH-C6 50.00

2.00 8 40-80 20-40 Firm

3.85 5 40-80 20-40 Firm

5.30 23 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

7.00 14 75-150 37-75 Stiff

8.80 32 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

10.65 26 150-300 75-150 Very stiff

JICA KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. The Project of Landslide Management NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in the Republic of Mauritius (Final Report) CENTRAL CONSULTANT INC.

FUTABA INC.

3-81

b. Quatre Soeurs

The results of the standard penetration tests conducted on each borehole are shown in Table 3.6.19.

The geology tested was colluvium and the consistency was “stiff” or “firm”. Excluding borehole BH-Q1, the N values were almost uniform for the boreholes at a range of 10-20. As in Chitrakoot, the colluvium contained an abundance of gravel, which affected the N value. In addition, because the matrix is composed mainly of fines, the N value is expected to decline in regard to cohesive soil containing no gravel.

Table 3.6.19 Standard Penetration Test (source: JET)

Borehole Depth

(m) SPT

level SPT

N value Estimated UCS,kpa

(Jennings and Al,1973)Estimated

Cu,kpa Consistency

BH-Q1 21.00 1.00 6 40-80 20-40 Firm

BH-Q2 21.00

1.13 12 75-150 37-75 Stiff

2.20 17 75-150 37-75 Stiff

3.55 15 75-150 37-75 Stiff

5.00 15 75-150 37-75 Stiff

6.75 14 75-150 37-75 Stiff

10.35 16 75-150 37-75 Stiff

13.45 Penetration not possible

Possibly cobbles/boulders