46

The LEO - NSCA Free Mass/Fat Mass FFM% FM% ... DNV >5/day 1x/day. LEO ‐‐Conclusions ... The LEO Fitness Project A collaboration between

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

The LEO Fitness ProjectA collaboration between 

Lee County Sheriff’s Office (LCSO)AND

The LEO Fitness Project

Ezilon.com Yellowmap.com

FGCU – 10th State University in Florida.    University opened in August, 1997

LEO Project

Approximately 1,500 employees• Sworn law enforcement • Corrections• Civilians 

Research Team2 faculty from ES program4 senior ES students10‐15 junior ES students1 researcher from George Washington UniversityMedical Director from Cigna Onsite Health Clinic Clinic Operations Manager and Wellness Director for LCSO StarCare Health Clinic

LEO Project• Marieb Hall opened January, 2012.

• Affords students and faculty to take advantage of “world class, state‐of‐the‐art” Human Performance Labs.

• Focal point for campus tours.– Visit from leadership of LCSO, January, ’13

• Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved Phase I in May of 2013 and subsequently approved Phase II (RIP) in November, 2013.

http://www.fgcu.edu/CHPSW/RS/ESBS/facilities.asp

LEO Project• Collaborative Model

• Phase I and II objectives.

• Strategies used to educate LEO participants.

LEO Project• Champions

– Sheriff– Executive Director– FGCU Dean of College of Health Professions and Social Work

– Department of Rehabilitation Science Chair

– Research Team

• Collaborators– Medical Director (COH)

• On‐site Healthcare providers

– LCSO Wellness Director– Exercise Science “Interns”– Exercise Science students

LEO Project

• Phase I– Assist each participant to know where they stood in terms of health/wellness and overall fitness

• Phase II– Discover known and unknown needs

LEO Project• Laboratory Tests

– HGB A1C– Total Cholesterol– LDL– Triglycerides– HDL– Cortisol

• SF36

• Human Performance Lab Assessments– HHQ– Resting BP, HR, Ht.– HRPF components

• Body composition • http://www.fgcu.edu/CHPSW/RS/files/IMG_1973mod.jpg

• CRF • http://www.fgcu.edu/CHPSW/RS/files/IMG_2256mod.jpg

– Muscular Fitness • http://www.fgcu.edu/CHPSW/RS/files/Kaiser_Pneumatic_1.jpg

– Flexibility

LEO Project ‐‐ IEPs10 week Individualized Exercise Program (IEP)

– Developed by research team using participant data, and input on what they wanted to do.

Implementation by FGCU ES “interns” 

Weekly meetings

LEO Project ‐‐ IEPs• Post Intervention Plan• Quarterly Assessments

LEO Phase I

What we found

LEO Phase IInitial Results (SFS 36)

SF36 – Patient‐reported survey of patient healthA 36‐item measure of health statusEight sections included are:

vitalityphysical functioningbodily paingeneral health perceptionsphysical role functioningsocial role functioningmental health

Adequate pilot data but not enough data for statistical significance. Three main points coming from the SFS 36 pilot study data:1.)  For the participants who began the study but dropped out, data suggested that there was an improvement noted in their energy and mental health functioning.2.)  For all of the participants who began the study and completed it, there was an improvement in mental health functioning which can translate into decreased stress and increased energy.3.) Quality of life with regard to physical functioning was at average based on the type of employment.

“Very important findings based on physiology.  Just need more participants .”

LEO ‐‐ Phase I and II

LEO Phase I

5.63 5.59PRE POST

Intervention Results – Laboratory Tests

LEO Phase I

192

186

133

107

110

99

19% 9%

Intervention Results – Laboratory Tests

Total Cholesterol

LDLTriglycerides

3%

LEO Phase I

17.1 17.7

Cortisol

Intervention Results – Laboratory Tests

4%

LEO Phase I

Systolic DiastolicPre 134 88Post 116 74

Resting Blood Pressure

Physical Fitness Evaluations – Resting Measures Intervention Results

Resting Heart Rate

Pre

Post

68

71

LEO Phase IPhysical Fitness Evaluations – Resting Measures 

Intervention Results

Fat Mass 

Pre Post

Fat Free Mass

Pre Post

%Body Fat

Pre Post

LEO Phase I

Upper Body Strength Lower Body Strength Flexibility

Physical Fitness Evaluations –Intervention Results

PRE POST PRE POST PRE POST

LEO Phase ICardiorespiratory Fitness

LEO Sworn Personnel Low High

Physical Fitness Evaluations –CRF  Intervention Results

LEO Phase ILaboratory Tests – Quarterly Results

5.35

5.4

5.45

5.5

5.55

5.6

5.65

5.7

5.75

5.8

5.85

HGB A1C CORTISOL

LEO Phase I

0

50

100

150

200

250

6/13 10/13 1/14 3/14 6/14 9/14 12/14 4/15 7/15

Lipid Profiles 

TC LDL Trig HDL

LEO ‐‐ Phase I and II

Laboratory Tests – Quarterly Results

LEO Phase IBody Mass

180

185

190

195

200

205

210

215

220

225

230Fat Free Mass/Fat Mass

FFM% FM%

LEO ‐‐ Phase I and II

Body Composition Quarterly Results

LEO Phase I

3.5

7

10.5

14

17.5

21

24.5

28

31.5

35

38.5

42

45.5

49

#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9

ml/k

g/min

Cardiorespiratory Fitness – Quarterly Results

Intervention

Year 1

Year 2

Total Outcome

LEO Phase I

Upper and Lower Body Strength

UBS LBS

Muscular Endurance

ME

LEO ‐‐ Phase I and II

Muscular Fitness Quarterly Results

LEO Phase I

Flexibility

Muscular Fitness Quarterly Results

LEO Project – Phase II

www.sheriffleefl.org/main

LEO Phase II• Wellness emphasis (RIP)

• 150 Participants (November 2013) 

• Present strategies based on RIP outcomes

LEO Phase IIRIP – Protocol 

• IRB and informed consent

• Procedures

– Risk inventory survey

– Blood draw

– Resting biometric measures

LEO ‐‐ Phase I and II

LEO Phase II• Direct measurements

– Resting blood pressure– Resting heart rate– Body composition– Lab measures

• Dyslipidemia• Diabetes• Stress level (cortisol)

• Web‐based survey– Nutrition– Smoking– Family health history– Quality of life status– Physical activity

RIP – Participants Males

<30 =  930‐39 =  4240 – 49 =  2950 – 59 = 360 and > = 2

154 Participants

Males =  85Females =  69Total =  154

Females<30 =  1530‐39 =  2640 – 49 =  1950 – 59 =  660 and > =  3

LEO ‐‐ Phase I and II

LEO Phase II

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Males Females

# of Participants

TC < 200 TC 200‐239 TC >240

Total Cholesterol

LEO Phase II‐‐ RIP Results ‐ Triglycerides

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Males Females

# of Participants

<150 150‐199 200‐499

LEO ‐‐ Phase I and II

LEO Phase II ‐‐ RIP Results Dyslipidemia

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Total # of Participants Male Female

Self‐Reported High Risk Lab Results

Cholesterol

LEO Phase II RIP Results

Labs FHx Meds0

10

20

30

40

50

HGB A1C>5.7 

Total Males Females

Diabetes

Measured Diagnosed On Meds FHx

SBP DBP

LEO Phase II ‐‐ RIP ResultsRisk of Hypertension

LEO Phase II – RIP Results

Body Composition

7‐20

>24

Males Females

Body Mass IndexMales Females

>30

>30

25‐29.9

25‐29.9

18.6‐24.9

18.6‐24.9

20.1‐24

30.1‐37

15‐30

7‐20

LEO Phase I – RIP Results

Males

NormalOverfat

overweight

Females

Normal

Overweight 

Overfat

Body Composition

LEO Phase I – RIP Results

Perception of Body Fat

Survey BMI Body Composition Analysis

LEO Phase I– RIP Results

Guidelines Self‐rating

never

Meet

Physical Activity/Sedentary LifestyleDoes Not Meet

LEO Phase I – RIP ResultsSmoking

NonSmoker

Current

Former

Vaping

DNV

>5/day 1x/day

LEO ‐‐ Conclusions• Need to enhance PF (especially sworn personnel)

• LEO – Phase I          aerobic capacity VO2

• Increased general medical health, wellness and QoL

LCSO/FGCUPotential Future Collaborations

Assessment and Training Service Agreement– 2 year assessment program involving the members of the 

LCSO special operations units to enhance healthcare delivery• Assessment program• Use LCSO Employee Healthcare Clinic’s Electronic Medical Records

– 3 year agreement to develop IEP for the operators who are involved in the assessment project.

• IEP’s developed, implemented and supervised by faculty and senior level exercise science students.

LCSO/FGCUPotential Future Collaborations

– Communications department (“dispatcher” pool)

– PA program following national guidelines of daily PA.

– Health‐fitness assessment– Assessment data would be integrated 

into their EMR currently kept at the employee healthcare clinic.• Integration of the data using a “team” concept of developing and implementing an activity based program to improve the subject’s health (i.e. wellness) would be utilized during study period.

• Senior level ES students supervising subjects

– 3X/day

Active Work Station (AWS) Pilot Study

The LEO Fitness ProjectThank you

Participants of the LEO projectNational Strength & Conditioning AssociationSheriff Mike ScottDean Mitchell Cordova, PhD, ATC, FNATA, FACSMEric Shamus, PhD, DPT, CSCS, Chair, Department of Rehab Sciences Bill Bergquist, Executive Director, Civilian Operations Executive BureauJoel Caschette, MD and members of the StarCare ClinicConnie Metzger, RN COHCFaculty of Clinical Lab SciencesArmando Hernandez, Kirby Retzer, Tyler Golde, Jacob YoungFGCU Exercise Sciences students

The LEO Fitness ProjectA collaboration between 

Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU) and 

Lee County Sheriff’s Office (LCSO)Contact Information:

Dennis Hunt, EdD, CSCS Capt. Scott Lucia Barbara Hess, MAFGCU Lee County Sheriff’s Dept FGCUDept of Rehab 14750 Six Mile Cypress Pkwy Dept of Rehab Sciences10501 FGCU Blvd Fort Myers, FL 33912 10501 FGCU BlvdFort Myers, FL 33965 Fort Myers, FL 33965 239‐590‐7536 239‐477‐1000 239‐590‐[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]