Upload
ngoxuyen
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
The Influence of Liquidity on Financial Performance of Islamic Banking in
Indonesia1
Deky Anwar2 Mohd Rizal Muwazir3
Abstract
This study aims to find out how the influence of liquidity variables on financial performance variables in Indonesia's Islamic banking. The variables used in this research are CAR, FDR, LR and CR as proxy of liquidity, while ROA and ROE as proxy of Islamic banking financial performance in Indonesia. The data used in this study is secondary data from monthly report of Islamic banking publications in Indonesia from January 2008 to December 2016. As for the samples of this study are all Islamic Commercial Bank (BUS) and Islamic Business Unit (UUS) that exist throughout Indonesia exluding Islamic Rural Bank (BPRS). The data were processed by using multiple linear regression analysis by running test on classical assumption and hypothesis. The result of the research shows that CAR and CR liquidity variables significantly influence financial performance, while FDR and LR have no significant effect. Then the results of the study also show that the relationship between liquidity and financial performance is negative, which means that if Islamic banking liquidity increases so the financial performance of Islamic banking in Indonesia will decrease. The results of this study explain that Islamic banking must be able to maintain its liquidity position not to reach excess condition, so as not to affect the decline in financial performance. Keywords: Liquidity, Financial Performance, Islamic Bank
1 Presented on 3rd International Conference on Islamic Economics and Financial Inclusion (ICIEFI), UMY
Yogyakarta, July 11-12th 2018.
2 Student of Ph.D Program Department of Shariah and Management Academy of Islamic Studies University of
Malaya and Lecturer of Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business (FEBI) UIN Raden Fatah Palembang
3 Senior Lecturer Department of Shariah and Management Academy of Islamic Studies University of Malaya
2
1. Introduction
The growth of the Islamic banking industry in Indonesia began in 1991 with the
establishment of Bank Muamalat Indonesia (BMI). The establishment of the Islamic
financial industry is fueled by the opinion that bank interest is the same as that which
is confirmed by the release of Fatwa of the Indonesian Ulama Council on the bank
interest of the bank which was the result of a workshop on scholars of bank and
banking interest in Cisarua, Bogor on 19-22 August 1990 (Anshori, 2008). In
addition, sociologically Indonesia is also the country with the largest Muslim majority
in the world, so an Islamic bank is required to respond and facilitate the business and
economic activities undertaken by Muslim communities in Indonesia.
Liquidity is a very important thing for the bank to manage well as it will affect
profitability as well as business sustainability and continuity. It is also reflected in
Bank Indonesia regulations that set liquidity as one of the eight risks that banks must
take care of. The concept of liquidity in the business world is defined as the ability to
sell assets in the shortest time with minimal losses. But the understanding of liquidity
in the banking world is more complex compared to the business world in general
(Alshatti, 2015). In terms of assets, liquidity is the ability to convert all assets into
cash, while from the perspective of liquidity, liquidity is the ability of banks to meet
the fund's needs through increased portfolio liabilities. For the case in Indonesia,
banking liquidity issues are still a serious concern for the government, as data are
based on data on failure in banking management in Indonesia which affects massive
liquidity in 1997 which has a chain link to macroeconomics that ultimately leads to a
crisis economy. At the time of economic crisis in 1997, conventional banking had to
raise interest rates and interest rates up to 70%. Consequently, conventional banks
are experiencing negative spread and liquidity difficulties to pay for deposits while
loans are being disbursed very little because entrepreneurs are not willing to pay
credit interest rates and even if loans can be disbursed, the potential of non
performing loans (NPLs) is huge.
In liquidity theory, banking needs to continue to do and offset its liquidity,
(Zhu, 2001). If the liquidity balance is not maintained, then the banking financial
performance will be disturbed and will cause much risk for the bank, (Ismal, 2010).
The influence of liquidity management on the financial performance of conventional
banking and Islamic banking has been examined by several studies conducted in
3
various countries, both developed countries that examine conventional banking as
well as in developing countries whose majority of Muslims are studying Islamic
banking. From the research results of Deep & Schaefer, (2004), Wiyono, S., (2012),
Bolek, M., & Wilinski, W. (2012), Lartey, V., Antwi, S. & Boadi, E. (2013 ), Ajyhan, A.
(2013), Zygmunt, J. (2013), Priya, K., & Nimalathasan, B., (2013), Ruziqa, A. (2013),
Priyo, (2014), and Abraham, T, (2015), it can be seen that there is a significant effect
of liquidity with banking financial performance. Therefore, liquidity management
becomes an important part of the bank in keeping their financial performance in good
condition.
In determining what financial performance variables need to know the effects of
liquidity management, Wilcox, J. W. (1984) Reger, R.K. Duhaime, I.M, & Stimpert, J.L
(1992), Simpson W.G & Kohers, T (2002), Lindblom, T., & Von Koch, C. (2002).
Castelli, A., Dwyer Jr., G. P., & Hasan, I. (2006), said the ROA and ROE variables are the
most popular and meaningful financial variables for banks to measure whether
banking financial performance or not. Likewise, the liquidity variables directly affect
ROA and ROE. From various studies conducted by Molyneux, P. & Thornton, J. (1992),
Kunt, A.D. Laeven, L. & Levine, R. (2003), Wagner, (2004) Kosmidou, K. Tanna, S. &
Pasiouras, F. (2005), Defri, (2012), Purbaningsih. Y.P., (2012), Arifin (2012), Paul,
(2013), Muharrom, & Kurnia, (2013), Ibe (2013), Ferrouhi, (2014), Sandy, G.E.
(2015), Alshatti, (2015), and Khan (2015) find that CAR, LR, CR and FDR are variables
that can represent the liquidity performance of a bank. They say that the relationship
between the liquidity and ROA and ROE variables is negative. Based on the above
introduction, there are some research problems that are: (1) Is there any influence
between liquidity variable on sharia banking performance in Indonesia? (2) How the
influence of liquidity variable on sharia banking performance in Indonesia. Based on
the above research problems, there are several research objectives: (1) To know
whether there is influence between liquidity variable to sharia banking performance
in Indonesia. (2) Explain how the influence of liquidity variable on sharia banking
performance in Indonesia.
4
Previous Research
The vast majority of empirical studies on the relationship between bank performance
and bank liquidity were conducted in Europe among his studies were about the
factors of the performance of the eighteen European banks of 1986 and 1989. The
findings show that the ratio of liquid assets to total assets is related negative with
Return on Asset (ROA), (Molyneux, P. & Thornton, J., 1992). Similarly, studies
conducted in the UK on the commercial banking industry during the period 1995-
2002 which examine the effects of bank characteristics, macroeconomic conditions
and financial market structures on bank margin net margin and return on average
asset (ROA). The results show that the ratio of liquid assets to customers and short-
term financing is positively correlated with average return on assets (ROAA) and
negatively associated with Net Interest Margin (NIM), (Kosmidou, K., Tanna, S. &
Pasiouras, F ., (2005).
The study of internal and external determinants of twelve countries in Europe,
North America and the Australian banks has also been carried out with the results of
the study showing that the liquidity ratio measured by liquid assets against total
assets is positively related to Return On Assets (ROA) (Bourke, P., 1989). Another
study of banking performance factors seen from the perspective of liquidity risk
banking. Using the commercial bank panel datasets from 12 countries with advanced
economies (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg,
Netherlands, Switzerland, Taiwan, England and the United States) during the period
1994-2006. The results show that liquidity risk is an endogenous determinant of
bank performance measured by the average ROA, the average ROE and net interest
margin, and the associated negative liquidity risk associated with the average the
return on ROA assets and the ROE and positive returns associated with net interest
margin (NIM), (Chen, Y.K., Kao, L.F., Shen, C.H., & Yeh, C.Y., 2009).
The study of the relationship between liquidity risk and financial performance of
Islamic banks in Malaysia over the period 2006-2008 found that, in times of crisis,
liquidity risk and asset return rate (ROA) and ROE levels tend to behave in the
opposite way and liquidity risk can lower ROA and ROE, (Ariffin, NM, 2012). A study
in Egypt that analyzed a sample of 28 banks during the period 1989-2004. This study
examines the impact of capital regulations on the performance and stability of banks
in Egypt. The study found that the liquidity measured by the customer's net credit
5
ratio and short-term financing, statistically significant and positively correlated with
the profitability of domestic banks and bank liquidity did not determine the return
on assets or equity (ROA) significantly, (Naceur, SB & Kandil, M., 2009).
Other studies analyze banks from various countries that fall within the OECD
category, developing countries and countries in the course of economic transitions.
The study examines the determinants of banking interest rates in 80 countries. The
results show that liquidity risk measured by the ratio of credit to total assets is
negatively associated with asset returns (ROA) and is positively correlated with net
interest margin levels (NIM), (Kunt, AD, Laeven L. & Levine R. , 2003). In Indonesia
there are also many studies on liquidity and relationships with banking and Islamic
banking performance, among which are studies aimed at knowing the effect of capital
and liquidity risk on profits on Rural Banks in Indonesia. The independent variables
in this study were the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) and the Loan Deposit Ratio
(LDR), while the dependent variable was Return on Assets (ROA). The results show
that capital risk (CAR) and liquidity (LDR) have a significant effect on ROA on
Indonesian Rural Banks. Partially, the results show that the Capital Adequacy Ratio
(CAR) and Ratio LDR (LDR) have a positive and significant impact on the ROA on
Indonesian Rural Banks (Purnamawati, I.G.A., 2014).
The next study is a study that examines the effect of liquidity and solvency on
Indonesian banking financial performance which is listed on the Indonesia Stock
Exchange period 2010-2012. This study uses liquidity variables consisting of Non
Performing Loans (NPLs) and Loan Dept Ratio (LDR) while solvency is proxied with
the Capital adequacy ratio (CAR) and Dept Equity Ratio (DER), for financial
performance is proxied by Return On Asset ROA). The results of this study indicate
that NPLs have no effect on ROA while for LDR, CAR and DER simultaneously affect
ROA, (Sandy, G.E., 2015). Other studies are about the effects of bank size, net working
capital, ROA, ROE, CAR, NPLs, Interest rates on deposits and interest rates on bank
liquidity in Indonesia. The findings show that Net Working Capital, ROA, ROE, CAR,
Deposit Rate, and Interest Rate Rate have significant influence on banking liquidity.
Meanwhile, Bank Size and NPLs have no effect on banking liquidity, (Santoso, A.L., &
Sukihanjani, T., 2012).
Further studies on banking performance are about the performance of Bank
Perkreditan Rakyat (BPR) in Indonesia. The variables used in this study include the
6
ratio of payments (BOPOs), capital adequacy ratios (CAR), Non Performing Loans
(NPLs), Loan To Deposit Ratio (LDR) as independent variables. Return On Assets
(ROA) and Net Interest Margin Ratio (NIM) used for BPR performance proxies. The
data used are from 164 BPRs operating in Java between 2009 and 2012. The findings
show that BOPOs and NPLs have an important role in explaining the performance of
BPRs in Indonesia. The findings in this study show that efficiency and prudence in
management policy for the banking industry in Indonesia should be of great
importance, (Chou T., & Buchdadi A.D, 2016). Another study on the effect of Capital
adequacy ratio (CAR), liquidity (LDR), operational efficiency (ROI) on profit (ROA) of
banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI). The results show
that CAR has a positive and insignificant effect on ROA on the listed companies in IDX,
LDR has a positive and insignificant effect on ROA on the listed companies in the BEI,
and has a negative and significant impact on ROA on listed banking companies in the
BEI, (Defri, 2012).
Differences With Previous Research
This research complements some previous studies, because in this study used
different liquidity and financial performance variables to measure the use of better
monetary instruments for liquidity management and financial performance. This
study also contributes to the existing literature by providing a new addition to the
previous literature on the role of sharia monetary instruments in managing liquidity
and improving the financial performance of sharia banking in Indonesia.
2. Literature Review
Concepts of Liquidity Management in Banking
Liquidity management is part of a larger financial industry risk management
framework, which deals with all conventional or Islamic financial institutions. In fact,
most bank failures are caused by difficulties in managing its liquidity problems. Every
public, conventional or Islamic bank, is required to constantly control and manage
liquidity positions effectively and carefully, (Islamic, M. M., & Chowdhury, H.A, 2007).
Liquidity is the most important instrument for each bank. This means that the bank
may change liabilities into assets. At the same time, bank liquidity is dependent on
the bank's operational confidence. Customers place deposits at banks with
7
confidence that they can withdraw their money. liquidity capability reflects the
performance of banking institutions and a decrease in banking liquidity can affect the
country's financial stability. Therefore, it is important for the bank to manage
sufficient liquidity so as to cope with any changes in financial and economic
conditions. Liquidity management issues are problems related to a company's ability
to meet its immediate financial obligations. The amount of payment instruments
(liquid assets) owned by a company at one time represents the pay force of the
company concerned. A company that has a pay force is not necessarily able to meet
its immediate financial obligations or in other words the company does not
necessarily have the ability to pay, (Ichsan, N, 2014).
Liquidity is the ability to sell assets in a short time with minimal losses. Liquid
assets are assets held in cash or invested in an instrument that can be converted into
cash forms such as deposits in the form of demand deposits, deposits and
investments in short-term liquid securities of government. Bank liquidity is also
recognized as a bank's ability to meet its obligations, particularly short-term funds
obligations. In terms of assets, liquidity is the ability to convert all assets into cash.
While from liability side, liquidity is the ability to meet the fund's needs through
increased portfolio liabilities. While according to a large Indonesian dictionary the
sense of liquidity in general is about a company's cash position and its ability to meet
obligations (pay the debt) due on time. When linked to a bank institution, it means
the ability of the bank at all times to repay its short-term debt when suddenly billed
by the customer or related parties. So, the liquidity here is the convenience of
converting the assets into cash from the respective banks concerned.
Sharia Banking Liquidity
Operational barriers faced by Islamic banking are difficulties in controlling their
liquidity effectively, it is seen in some of the symptoms, among others, (Arifin, 2000):
(1) There is no immediate investment opportunity available to the funds it receives.
Funds are accumulated and are unemployed for several days to reduce their average
income. (2) Difficulties in liquidating current investment funds, at the time of
withdrawal of funds in critical situations. As a result, Islamic banks held their liquid
assets in amounts greater than the conventional banking average. In general, Islamic
banks have two different barriers when compared to conventional banks: lack of
8
access to short-term financing, (Sulaiman, AA, 2013), particularly from BI as central
bank, and lack of access to money markets until Islamic banks can only maintaining
liquidity in cash. To anticipate the problem, there are some options most practiced
by the managers of emergency Islamic banks ie: refusing to take interest, taking
money and using it for social purposes,) investing in gold or other precious metals in
cash with a commercial contract and allow themselves to lose opportunities in the
money market and keep their funds in conventional banks without receiving interest
in the balance of the services it earns, (Bidabad B., & Allahyarifad, M., 2008).
Financial Performance of Sharia Banking
The Islamic banking industry has experienced rapid growth, (Kasri, 2010). With the
issuance of Law No.21 Year 2008 on Islamic Banking on July 16, 2008, the
development of the national Islamic banking industry is increasingly inadequate and
it will encourage growth more quickly (Hasan, 2011). The growth of Islamic banks is
quite impressive, with an average asset growth of more than 45.48% per annum in
the last five years (2011-2015), it is hoped that the role of the Islamic banking
industry in supporting the country's economy will be increasingly significant. The
growth of the Islamic banking office network has also grown rapidly (see table 1).
Table 1 Islamic Banking Offices
Indicators 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Sharia Commercial Bank
- Number of Banks 11 11 11 12 12 13 13
- Number of Offices 1.401 1.745 1.998 2.151 1990 1869 1825
Sharia Business Unit
- Number of Conventional Commercial Banks which have Sharia Business Units
24 24 23 22 22 21 21
- Number of Offices 336 517 590 320 311 332 344
Sharia Rural Bank
- Number of Banks 155 158 163 163 163 166 167
- Number of Offices 364 401 402 439 449 453 441
Total Office
2.101 2.663 2.990 2.910 2.750 2.654 2.580
Source: The Financial Services Authority of the Republic of Indonesia. (2017).
9
The growth of Bank Islam's total number of services is quite fast, growing more
than 22.79% over 20011-2017 on the number of Islamic Commercial Banks (BUS),
Islamic Business Unit and Islamic Citizens Financing (SRB) offices. Growth in Islamic
Public Bank has also grown rapidly. On BUS grew its number from 11 in 2011 to 13 BUS
in 2017, or reached 18.18% growth during 2011-2017, Islamic Business Unit (UUS)
growth reached -14.28% and SRB reached 7.74% in the same year4. The growth of this
sufficient office service proves that the attractiveness of Islamic Banking in Indonesia is
quite good. This growth is expected to continue as Islamic banking assets have not
reached 5% as set by Bank Indonesia (BI) at the end of 2008, (Hasan, 2011).
The existence of Bank Islam in Indonesia since 1991 up to now proves that Bank
Islam is strong enough to face the various Indonesian economic conditions that are
likely to be less stable since its inception, (Syafrida, I., & Zulmaita, 2011). Especially at
the time of the 1998 financial crisis which caused most of the conventional public banks
to be dissolved.The strength of Islamic banks was evident with the growing Islamic
banking in the country, where the function of Islamic banking intermediation continued
to increase with the average Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) above 100%, and then
the accelerated financing outflow (PYD) by Islamic Banking continued to grow
significantly until december reached Rp 285.185 trillion, this amount was not too far
from the growth of Third Party Fund (DPK) which reached Rp 334,719 trillion The
achievement has increased the assets of the Islamic banking industry to Rp 424,181
trillion p er December 2017, thus placing Islamic Banking shares on total national
banking assets to 4.59%.5 Islamic banking financial performance in Indonesia can be
summarized in Table 2 below:
Table 2
Asset Developments, Current Profit, Financing and Deposits of Islamic Banking 2011-2017 in Billions of Rupiah
Indicators 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Asset
145.467
195.018
242.276
272.343
296.262 356.504 424.181
Growth
34,06
24,23
12,41 8,78 20,33 18,98
Profit
289
3.423
4.364
2.049 1.210
1.420 1.691
4 Data diolah dari Statistik Perbankan Islam Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Republik Indonesia 2017.
5 Data diolah dari Statistik Perbankan Islam Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Republik Indonesia
10
Growth
1.083,96
27,49
(53,04)
(40,93) 17,35 19,08
Financing
102.655
147.505
184.122
199.330
203.894 249.051 286.850
Growth
43,69
24,82
8,26 2,29
22,14 15,17
Third-party funds
115.415
147.512
183.534
217.858
231.175 279.335 334.719
Growth
27,81
24,42
18,70 6,11 20,83 19,82
The existing data indicate that Islamic banking continues to grow well in terms of
assets, earnings and third party fundraising. During 2011 to 2017, Islamic banking
assets grew from Rp145.467 trillion to Rp424.181 trillion. This figure shows positive
growth each year which is even 34% more in 2011 and 24.23% in 2013. As for the next
year the growth ranges from 8% to 20% per year, and averaging over seven years of
growth (2011 -2017) reached 19.79%. Growth in Islamic banking assets shows that a
number of government policy packages and related agencies are relatively capable of
raising the awareness of the Indonesian Muslim community to be actively involved in
the Islamic banking industry. In addition to the development of assets, Islamic banking
during 2011 to 2017 it also recorded achievements in gaining profits marked by the
positive gains in the current year despite the negative growth. As seen from the profit
side, profit grew positively in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2016 and 2017 and experienced
negative growth in 2014 and 2015. However, nominal value is still very significant for a
banking industry, which is above Rp 8 trillion over the past three years. This implies
that in the economy, business in this industry is still very profitable so it is open
opportunity for business actors both at home and abroad to participate in the
acceleration process of Islamic banking, (Andriansyah, 2009).
The development of third-party funds in Islamic banking also showed significant
improvements. From Rp115, 415 trillion in 2011, third-party funds rose to Rp334.719
trillion in 2017. Each year, DPK growth is positive. The development of assets,
profitability, and third party funds on Islamic banking as described above is also
supported by Islamic banking capabilities to safeguard the stability of financing. From
the data it can be seen that the financing given by Islamic banking aggregated by Rp102,
655 trillion in 2011 increased to Rp424.181 trillion in 2017.
Source: The Financial Services Authority of the Republic of Indonesia. (2017).
11
Relationships between Liquidity Management and Financial Performance
Liquidity ratios indicate the company's ability to meet its short-term obligations, this
ratio also shows that the organization will face difficulty in meeting its short-term
financial obligations, (Amengor, C., 2010). This in turn will have a negative impact and
will affect the company's total activity, thereby disrupting its financial performance. In
addition, the increase in the value of these ratios can indicate the recovery of the
company's liquidity, which may reflect a positive effect on the volume of activity, and
thus ultimately affect financial performance, (Gibson, C., 2009). Liquidity problems can
affect the bank's profits and capital and in extreme circumstances liquidity can lead to
bank collapse. most microfinance institutions lend from the market even at a very high
level during the liquidity crisis. This in turn led to a decrease in bank profits. In addition,
further bank loans will be able to apply to meet the demand of depositors. As such, the
debt-to-equity ratio will rise and affect the bank's efforts to maintain optimum capital
structure, (Njeri, M.M., 2013).
Liquid assets such as cash and government securities generally have relatively low
returns, therefore, holding the liquidity tool will reduce the opportunity cost of the bank.
In the absence of a rule, it is desirable to expect that banks will have a liquid asset as far
as they can help to maximize profitability of the company. Since then, policymakers have
chosen to seek greater ownership than liquid assets, (Maaka Z.A., 2013). Profitability
can be enhanced by banks when banks hold some liquid assets, however, at some point
the liquid assets may also reduce the bank's profit, just as before. The findings are
conceptually consistent with relevant literature and are consistent with the idea that
the opportunity cost of holding low-end assets ultimately exceeds the benefit of any
increase in bank liquidity. Likewise, it is estimated there is a similar benefit of holding a
more liquid asset when the economy is down. The main purpose of each commercial
bank is to maximize profits. But, keeping bank liquidity is as important as the primary
goal. The dilemma faced by bank management is that increased profitability on liquidity
can bring serious problems to the bank. Therefore, there must be a trade-off between
the two destinations from the company.
Many previous studies have examined the relationship between liquidity ratios
and financial performance indicators or liquidity ratios and profit ratios, among others,
investigating the relationship between liquidity and bank profit listed on the Ghanaian
exchange during the period 2005-2010, resulting in a decline in the liquidity ratio and
12
registered bank profits, also indicates that there is a weak positive relationship between
liquidity and profitability (Lartey, V., Antwi, S., & Boadi, E., 2013). However, other
studies show significant relationships between liquidity and profit in commercial
companies listed on the stock market in Sri Lanka for five years from 2008 to 2012,
(Ajanthan, A., 2013). Other research also reinforces that there is an important role of
the liquidity ratio in the performance of the company and indicates that there is a
significant influence of liquidity ratio against profits in Polish companies, (Zygmunt, J.,
2013). Likewise, the study of the relationship between liquidity and achievement in
Indonesia has resulted in a liquidity ratio having a positive impact on the gross profit
margin of Islamic banking in Indonesia, (Wiyono, S., 2012). Other studies have found
that the current ratio and cash ratio are significantly related to Return on Assets (ROA),
(Priya, K., & Nimalathasan, B., 2013). Other research shows that the liquidity ratio has a
significant positive effect on Return on Asset (ROA), (Ruziqa, A., 2013).
Another study examined three CAMEL indicators (Liquidity Ratio, Capital
Adequacy Ratio, and Bad Credit Rate) affect Habib Bank AG Zurich's profits in terms of
ROE, ROA and fee income. Liquidity affects ROE, ROA and cost-to-income ratio positively
and implies that increased liquidity will lead to an increase in the profitability of a
commercial bank. In addition, the bad credit ratio affects ROE, ROA and fee income
negatively affecting. This research suggests that financial managers should pay
attention to the liquidity of commercial banks to increase profits. Profitability and
liquidity strengthen each other and therefore financial managers should not consider
these two variables as independent variables. The study also suggests that the Bank
should establish liquidity management processes through introduction, measurement,
monitoring, and financial institutions faced with efforts to continuously increase
margins, maintain the required capital ratios, strengthen financial balance and improve
efficiency in the organization, (Abraham, T., 2015).
3. Research Methodology
Research Design
The research design in this study is descriptive research. While in terms of time
dimension of this study is the cross sectional study. Descriptive research design is
appropriate for this study as it helps in understanding the influence of liquidity
management on the financial performance of Islamic banking in Indonesia by
13
answering some research questions on "What" and "How". Descriptive research is
conducted to ensure and reflect the characteristics of interest variables in the
circumstances. The main purpose of descriptive research is to offer a profile of the
researcher or to illustrate relevant aspects of an interesting phenomenon from an
individual, organization, industrial or other perspective, (Sekaran, U., & Bougie, J. R.
G., 2016). Descriptive research has several advantages like; helps in understanding
the characteristics of a group in a given situation, helping systematic thinking about
certain aspects of a particular situation. Offer ideas for further investigation and
research and help in making simple decisions. Descriptive research is to illustrate the
characteristics of objects, people, groups, organizations, or the environment. In other
words, descriptive research attempts to draw a picture of a particular situation by
discussing who, what, when, where, and how the question, (Cooper, D.R., & Pamela
S., 2014).
Research Data
The data used in this study are monthly from January 2008 to December 2016 by 108
months. Data usage from Year 2008 to December 2016 is due to see how the liquidity
and financial performance of Islamic banking in Indonesia after the global financial
crisis in 2008. The data collected in this study is secondary data so that data collection
techniques use documentation. Data in the form of liquidity variables comprises the
Capital Adequacy Ratio, Financing to Deposit Ratio, Liquid Ratio, Cash Ratio are
obtained by collecting statistical reports on Islamic banking that reported the
Financial Services Authority (OJK) Indonesia which has been issued to the public.
Data in the form of Return On Assets and Return on Equity are obtained by collecting
statistical reports on Islamic banking reported by the Financial Services Authority
(OJK) Indonesia issued to the public from 2008 up to 2016. This study selects Islamic
banks with categories of banks with the form of Sharia Commercial Bank (BUS) and
Sharia Business Unit (UUS) for example without entering the Sharia Rural Bank
(BPRS). The sample of this research data is 13 BUS and 21 UUS with the number of
Islamic banks used as the sample in this study are 34 Islamic banks. This research
uses quantitative, descriptive and econometric approaches to answer the study on
the liquidity management and financial performance of the Islamic banking industry
in Indonesia over the period (2008-2016). The analysis tool used is the multiple
14
linear regression analysis calculated using the Least Squares Method-OLS method. In
calculating all the econometric models above the SPPS statistics program is used to
calculate the liquidity management and financial performance of the Islamic banking
industry in Indonesia. So the objective of the study can be answered well
Research Model
In this study, we use two linear regression models that are used to answer the
objective of the study, between two models:
Y1 = a0 + a1x1 +a2x2 +a3x3 + a4x4 + ℇ ......................(1)
Y2 = b0 + b1x1 +b2x2 +b3x3 + b4x4 + ℇ ......................(2)
Where;
Y1: Is a representative of the financial performance of the Islamic Banking industry
in Indonesia represented by ROE.
Y2: Is a representative of the financial performance of the Islamic Banking industry
in Indonesia represented by ROA.
x1: Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR)
x2: Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR)
x3: Cash Ratio (CR)
x4: Liquid Ratio (LR)
a0, is the Intersep value / constant of the ROE model
b0, is the Intersep value / constant of the ROA model
a1, a2, a3, and a4 is the coefficient value of five independent variables ROE
b1, b2, b3, and b4 is the coefficient value of five independent variables ROA
Definition of Variables
a. Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR): A ratio used to measure the capital adequacy of the asset's
total assets. Capital adequacy ratio is obtained through the Capital / Total Asset formula.
15
b. Funding to Deposit Ratio (FDR): The amount of the ratio between the amount of third
party funds and the funds that can be channeled. Financing Rate to Deposit Ratio is
obtained through the Formula Total Third Party Fund / Total Financing.
c. Cash Ratio (CR): The ratio of current assets to current liabilities is much greater. The Cash
Ratio value is obtained through the Current Assets / Current Liabilities formula.
d. Liquid Ratio (LR): Liquid ratio is the ratio of total assets. The Liquid Ratio value is
obtained through the Liquid Asset Formula / Total Assets.
e. Return on Assets (ROA): is a ratio of return on investment when compared to Assets
owned. The Return on Assets value is obtained through the Net Revenue / Total Asset
formula.
f. Return on Equity (ROE): is a ratio of return on investment compared to paid-in capital.
The Return on Return on Equity is obtained through the Owner / Net Income Revenue
formula.
4. Findings and Interpretation
Statistical Analysis and Interpretation
1. Classic Assumption Test
Based on assumption classic tests (normality test, heterocedasticity test,
multicolinearity test, and autocorrelation test) resulted that data are normally
distributed, because the significance value of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is bigger
than the significance level at 0,05 both in conventional banks (0,341) and Islamic
banks (0,185). In addition, there are no heterocedasticity, multicolinearity, and
autocorrelation in the regression model so this model is suitable to predict
liquidity risk that is measured by cash to total assets which are influenced by CAR,
profitability ratios, NIM, LG, and RLA.
2. Hypothesis Testing
Equation Variables Coefficient Sig (α=5%) Remark
(1)/ROA
CAR -,334 ,000 Accepted LR -9,600 ,010 Accepted FDR ,005 ,294 Rejected CR -1,495 ,174 Rejected
(2)/ROE
CAR -1,925 ,044 Accepted LR -130,696 ,003 Accepted FDR ,272 ,027 Rejected CR 18,817 ,517 Rejected
Source: Output of SPSS, (2018)
16
Based on both the models used in this research and the results of various
regression analysis in the table above which have been undergoing data repairs
because there are some problems in classical assumptions and statistical tests
then the coefficients for each variable are as follows:
ROA = 8,460 - 0,334 CAR - 9,600 LR .............(1)
ROE = 70,092 - 1,925 CAR - 130,696 LR .............(2)
For equation 1 constant value (ROA) is 8,460. This means that if CAR (Capital
Behavior Ratio) and LR (Liquidity Ratio) are equal to zero (0), the total value of
ROA (Return on Assets) will have a value of 8,460 units. For equation 2 constant
value (ROE) is 70,092. This means that if CAR (Capital Behavior Ratio) and LR
(Liquidity Ratio) are equal to zero (0), ROE (Return on Equity) will have a value of
70,092 units. The CAR regression coefficient (Capital Eligibility Ratio) from the
calculation result in equation 1 obtained a coefficient value - 0.334. This means
that there is an increase of CAR (Capital Adequacy Ratio) by 1 percent, so the value
of ROA will decrease by - 0.334 percent. Whereas for the equation 2 CAR
regression coefficient (Capital Eligibility Ratio) from the calculation result in
equation 2 gets coefficient value equal to - 1,925. This means that every CAR
increase (Capital Adequacy Ratio) is 1 percent, then ROE value will decrease by -
1.925 percent. The LR (Liquidity Ratio) regression coefficient from the calculation
result in equation 1 gets the coefficient value equivalent to - 9,600. This means that
each CAR (Capital Adjustment Ratio) increases by 1 percent, then the ROA value
will decrease by - 9,600 percent. The equation 2 of the LR (Liquidity Ratio)
regression coefficient from the calculation result in equation 2 gets the coefficient
value equivalent to - 130,696. This means that every LR increase (Liquidity Ratio)
is 1 percent, then ROE value will decrease by 130,696 percent.
Results
This research wish to mengatehaui and mengeumnkan penagruh from liquidity
variable to kinjera keunagan perbanak syariah in Indonesia. Specifically inigin see
how the relationship terbeduka anatar likuidiyas with the performance kuangan
syariah bank. Based on previous research that there is a significant influence
17
between liquidity and financial performance of sharia banking, Deep & Schaefer,
(2004), Wiyono, S., (2012), Bolek, M., & Wilinski, W. (2012), Lartey, V (2013),
Zygmunt, J. (2013), Priya, K., & Nimalathasan, B., (2013), ruziqa, A. (2013), Priyo,
(2014), and Abraham, Tesfai, (2015). Then liquidity dancers of performance
jeunagan adlah berkegel negtaif, in the sense laian if there is an increase in
liquidity will reduce the performance keukagan syariah banking Molyneux, P. &
Thornton, J. (1992), Kunt, AD Laeven, L. & Levine, R. (2003), Wagner, (2004)
Kosmidou, K. Tanna, S. & Pasiouras, F. (2005), Defri, (2012), Purbaningsih, YP,
2012, Arifin (2012), Paul, (2013), Muharrom, & Kurnia, (2013), Ibe (2013),
Ferrouhi, (2014), Sandy, GE (2015), Alshatti, (2015 ), and Khan (2015).
The results of the study show that if there is a surge in change or an increase
in the capital adequacy ratio and the liquidity component in Islamic banking, it will
result in its financial performance in the form of reduced profit returns and vice
versa. The results of this study are supported by other studies in developed
countries, developing countries with mostly Muslim population and research
conducted in Indonesia, although there are also different research results. Then
from both factors between capital and liquidity can be seen that the liquidity factor
has a big impact on the profit rate when compared to the capital adequacy ratio.
Then, the liquidity and capital adequacy ratio has a greater impact on ROE than
ROA. Then if Islamic banking is too tight to manage its liquidity then it will be
impressed at the profit level to be earned. Liquidity issues can affect the income
and capital of banks and in extreme circumstances liquidity can lead to bank
collapse. Efforts to manage the liquidity of Islamic banking can benefit from
Islamic monetary instruments which is a way for Islamic banking to do so as
portfolio adjustments. The dominant factor that drives Islamic banking into the
portfolio is streamlined in relation to the desired profits. On the contrary, the level
of capital can help the lack of liquidity experienced by Islamic banking in
Indonesia.
5. Conclusion and Suggestion
The main purpose of this study is to answer the research problems that have been
proposed that is to determine whether there is influence between liquidity variables
on the performance of Islamic banking in Indonesia. Then to explain how the
18
influence of liquidity variables on the performance of sharia banking in Indonesia.
Based on the results of the study found that the variables CAR and LR are variables
that have a significant influence on the performance of Islamic banking in Indonesia
in the form of ROA and ROE. Then the influence is negative ie apabilai terjadia
[enlargement of lukuiditas hence will menutunkan performance of syariah banking
in indonesia. Then, the researcher suggested to syariah banking in Indonesia to be
able to menjaag lesimbnagan liquidity in the condition of non-excess liquidity agra
not berkaru to decrease performance keunagannya. To overcome the excess liquidity
of syariah banak in Indonesia can memenafataakn facilities offered by Indonesian
banks in the form of placement of funds in Bank Indonesia Sharia Certificates or can
also memenfataakn interbank money market based on sharia principles. The
marijuana in this syariah monetary instrument will help the sharia bank in Indonesia
to reduce the risk of decreasing the profit and performance of keunagan syariah bank,
so that the performance of syariah banking in Indonesia can be better.
.
19
BIBLIOGRAPHY Abraham, T. (2015). Evaluating the Relationship between Liquidity, Capital Adequacy and
Non-Performing Loans on Financial Performance: Case Study of Habib Bank Ag Zurich. (Masters Thesis). Retrieved from http://erepo.usiu.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11732/628.
Ajanthan, A. (2013). Nexus between liquidity and profitability: A study of trading companies in Sri Lanka. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(7).
Alshatti. (2015). The Effect of the Liquidity Management on Profitability in The Jordanian Commercial Banks. International Journal of Business and Management. 10(1).
Amengor, C. (2010). Importance of Liquidity and Capital Adequacy to Commercial Banks. A Paper Presented at Induction Ceremony of ACCE, UCC Campus. Retrieved from http://www.charteredeconomists.org
Andriansyah, Y. (2009). Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan Islam di Indonesia dan Kontribusinya bagi Pembangunan Nasional. Jurnal Ekonomi Islam La_Riba, 3(2).
Anshori. A.G. (2008). Sejarah Perkembangan Hukum Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia dan Implikasinya bagi Praktik Perbankan Nasional. Jurnal Ekonomi Islam La_Riba, 2(2).
Bidabad. B., & Allahyarifad. M. (2008). Assets and Liabilities Management in Islamic Banking, Paper Presented at the 3rd International Conference on Islamic Banking and Finance, Karacehi, Pakistan.
Bourke, P. (1989). Concentration and other determinants of bank profitability in Europe, North America and Australia. Journal of Banking and Finance 13, 65–79. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/03784266(89)900204
Castelli, A., Dwyer Jr., G. P., & Hasan, I. (2006). Bank Relationships and Small Firms’ Financial Performance. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Working Paper Series.
Chen, Y.K., Kao, L.F., Shen, C.H., & Yeh, C.Y. (2009). Bank Liquidity Risk And Performance. Proceddings of The Asian Finance Association International Conference, Hong Kong.
Chou. T., & Buchdadi. A.D. (2016). Bank Performance and Its Underlying Factors: A Study of Rural Banks in Indonesia. Accounting and Finance Research, 5(3).
Cooper, D.R., & Pamela S.S. (2014). Business Research Methods, Twelfth Edition, International Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Deep. A. & Schaefer, G.K. (2004). Are Banks Liquidity Transformers? KSG Working Paper No. RWP04-022. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=556289.
Defri, (2012). Pengaruh Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Likuiditas dan Efisiensi Operasional Terhadap Profitabilitas Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di BEI. Jurnal Manajemen, 1(1).
Ferrouhi, E.M. (2014). Bank Liquidity And Financial Performance: Evidence From Moroccan Banking Industry. Business: Theory and practice, 15(4).
Gibson, C. (2009), Financial Reporting and Analysis. 11 ed. México: Cengage Learning. Hasan. (2011). Analisis Industri Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika
Ekonomi Pembangunan, 1(1). Ibe, S.O. (2013). The Impact of Liquidity Management on the Profitability of Banks in
Nigeria. Journal of Finance and Bank Management, 1(1). Ichsan, N. (2014). Pengelolaan Likuiditas Bank Syariah. Jurnal Al-Iqtishad, 6(1).
20
Islam, M. M., & Chowdhury. H.A. (2007). A Comparative Study of Liquidity Management of an Islamic Bank and a Conventional Bank: The Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 5(1).
Ismal, R. (2010). The Management Of Liquidity Risk In Islamic Banks: The Case Of Indonesia, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/550/.
Kasri, R.A. (2010). The Determinants of Islamic Banking Growth in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 6(2).
Khan, M.A., Ali. Majid., & Khan, M.A. (2015). Gauging Profitability and Liquidity of Islamic Banks: Evidence from Malaysia and Pakistan. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 5(1).
Kosmidou, K., Tanna, S. & Pasiouras, F. (2005). Determinants of profitability of domestic UK commercial banks: panel evidence from the period 1995–2002, in Money Macro and Finance. Research Group Conference, Rethymno, Greece.
Kunt, A.D., Laeven. L. & Levine. R. (2003). The Impact Of Bank Regulations, Concentration, And Institutions On Bank Margins. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3030.
Lartey, V., Antwi, S., & Boadi, E. (2013). The relationship between liquidity and profitability of listed banks in Ghana. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(3).
Lindblom, T., & Von Koch, C. (2002). Cross-Border Bank Mergers and Acquisitions in the EU. The Service Industries Journal, 22(4).
Maaka. Z.A. (2013). The Relationship Between Liquidity Risk And Financial Performance Of Commercial Banks In Kenya. (Master Thesis). Retrieved from http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/60295.
Molyneux, P. & Thornton, J. (1992). Determinants of European bank profitability: a Note. Journal of Banking and Finance 16, 1173–1178. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/03784266(92)900658
Muharam, H. & Kurnia, H.P. (2013). The Influence of Fundamental Factors to Liquidity Risk on Banking Industry: Comparative Study between Islamic Bank and Conventional Bank in Indonesia Conference In Business, Accounting And Management. Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2339598
Naceur, S. B. & Kandil, M. (2009). The Impact Of Capital Requirements On Banks’ Cost Of Intermediation And Performance: The Case Of Egypt. Journal of Economics and Business 61, 70–89. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2007.12.001
Njeri, M.M. (2013). The Effects Of Liquidity On Financial Performance Of Deposit Taking Microfinance Institutions In Kenya. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http://chss.uonbi.ac.ke/sites/default/files/chss/Project_Mary_Corrected_for_binding.pdf.
Paul, S.C., Bhowmik, P.K., Islam, M.R., Kaium, M.A. & Masud, AA. (2013). Profitability and Liquidity of Conventional Banking and Islamic Banking in Bangladesh: A Comparative Study. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(24).
Priya, K., & Nimalathasan, B. (2013). Liquidity management and profitability: A case study of listed manufacturing companies in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Technological Exploration and Learning, 2(4).2
21
Purbaningsih, Y.P. (2012). The Effect of Liquidity Risk and Non Performing Financing (NPF) Ratio to Commercial Sharia Bank Profitability in Indonesia. Retrived from http://www.ipedr.com/vol73/012-ICWIS2014_A10020.pdf.
Reger, R. K., Duhaime, I. M., & Stimpert, J. L. (1992). Deregulation, Strategic Choice, Risk and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 13 (3).
Ruziqa, A. (2013). The impact of credit and liquidity risk on bank financial performance: The case of Indonesian conventional bank with total asset above 10 trillion Rupiah. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 6(2).
Sandy, G.E. (2015). Pengaruh Liquiditas Dan Solvabilitas Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan Indonesia Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Pada Tahun 2010 – 2012. Artikel Ilmiah Mahasiswa. Jawa Timur: Universitas Jember.
Santoso, A.L., & Sukihanjani, T. (2012). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Likuiditas Perbankan Di Indonesia. Solo: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, J. R. G. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. Sevent Edition. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Simpson, W. G., & Kohers, T. (2002). The Link between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2).
Sulaiman, A.A., Mohamad, M.T., & Samsudin, M.L. (2013). How Islamic Banks of Malaysia Managing Liquidity? An Emphasis on Confronting Economic Cycles. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(7).
Syafrida, I., & Zulmaita. (2011). Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Umum Islam Dalam Penerapan Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 9/1/PBI/2007. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 10(2).
Wagner, W. (2004). The Liquidity of Bank Assets and Banking Stability. Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=556128 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.556128
Wilcox, J. W. (1984). The P/B-ROE Valuation Model. Financial Analysis Journal, Jan-Feb 1984.
Wiyono, S. (2012). The Effect of Credit and Liquidity risk to Islamic Bank Profitability with Islamic Income and Profit Sharing Ratio as Moderating Variable. Proceddings of The 2 Annual International Conference on Micro and Macro Economics, Indonesia.
Zhu, H. (2001). Bank Runs, Welfare and Policy Implications. Bank for International Settlement Working Paper no 107, Basel. Retrieved from:http://www.bis.org/. h.1
Zygmunt, J. (2013). Does Liquidity Impact on Profitability?. A case of Polish Listed IT Companies. Paper Presented at Conference of Informatics and Management Sciences, Opole, Poland.