11
The Impact of Faking-Good The Impact of Faking-Good on the MCMI-III: on the MCMI-III: Implications for Family Implications for Family Court Assessments Court Assessments Paul Lenny & Greg Dear Edith Cowan University 2005

The Impact of Faking-Good on the MCMI-III: Implications for Family Court Assessments Paul Lenny & Greg Dear Edith Cowan University 2005

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Impact of Faking-Good on the MCMI-III: Implications for Family Court Assessments Paul Lenny & Greg Dear Edith Cowan University 2005

The Impact of Faking-Good on The Impact of Faking-Good on the MCMI-III: Implications for the MCMI-III: Implications for Family Court AssessmentsFamily Court Assessments

Paul Lenny & Greg Dear

Edith Cowan University

2005

Page 2: The Impact of Faking-Good on the MCMI-III: Implications for Family Court Assessments Paul Lenny & Greg Dear Edith Cowan University 2005

MCMI-III Background…

Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory – Third Edition (MCMI-III; Millon, Davis, & Millon, 1997).

Brief psychological test - screening for psychological disorders and syndromes

Extensively used in forensic settings (e.g. Family Court assessments)

Page 3: The Impact of Faking-Good on the MCMI-III: Implications for Family Court Assessments Paul Lenny & Greg Dear Edith Cowan University 2005

MCMI-III Custody Profile…

Common profile defined by elevations on:– Desirability Index– Histrionic Scale– Narcissistic Scale– Compulsive Scale– Low scores on all other scales

Elevations usually below clinical range.

Page 4: The Impact of Faking-Good on the MCMI-III: Implications for Family Court Assessments Paul Lenny & Greg Dear Edith Cowan University 2005

Mean MCMI-III Base Rate Scores for Child Custody Examinees

(McCann et al., 2001)

01020

30405060

7080

Dis

clos

ure-

XD

esira

bilit

y-Y

Deb

asem

ent-Z

Sch

izoi

d-1

Avo

idan

t-2A

Dep

ress

ive-

2BD

epen

dent

-3H

istri

onic

-4N

arci

ssis

tic-5

Ant

isoc

ial-6

AA

ggre

ssiv

e-6B

Com

puls

ive-

7P

assi

ve-A

ggre

ssiv

e-8A

Sel

f-Def

eatin

g-8B

Sch

izot

ypal

-SB

orde

rline

-CP

aran

oid-

PA

nxie

ty-A

Som

atof

orm

-HB

ipol

ar: M

anic

-ND

ysth

ymia

-DA

lcoh

ol D

ep.-B

Dru

g D

ep.-T

PTS

D-R

Thou

ght D

isor

der-S

SM

ajor

Dep

ress

ion-

CC

Del

usio

nal D

isor

der-P

PMCMI-III Scales

Mea

n B

ase

Rat

e S

core

s

McCann et al. (2001)Custody Litigants (n=259)

Mean MCMI-III Base Rate Scores for Child Custody Examinees (McCann et al., 2001)

01020304050607080

Dis

clos

ure-

X

Des

irabi

lity-

Y

Deb

asem

ent-Z

Sch

izoi

d-1

Avo

idan

t-2A

Dep

ress

ive-

2B

Dep

ende

nt-3

His

trion

ic-4

Nar

ciss

istic

-5

Ant

isoc

ial-6

A

Agg

ress

ive-

6B

Com

puls

ive-

7

Pas

sive

-Agg

ress

ive-

8A

Sel

f-Def

eatin

g-8B

Sch

izot

ypal

-S

Bor

derli

ne-C

Par

anoi

d-P

Anx

iety

-A

Som

atof

orm

-H

Bip

olar

: Man

ic-N

Dys

thym

ia-D

Alc

ohol

Dep

.-B

Dru

g D

ep.-T

PTS

D-R

Thou

ght D

isor

der-S

S

Maj

or D

epre

ssio

n-C

C

Del

usio

nal D

isor

der-P

P

MCMI-III Scales

Mea

n B

ase

Rat

e S

core

s Custody Litigants (n = 259)

Page 5: The Impact of Faking-Good on the MCMI-III: Implications for Family Court Assessments Paul Lenny & Greg Dear Edith Cowan University 2005

Possible causes…

Subclinical elevations on these scales are associated with normal, healthy, personality characteristics

Well-adjusted individuals responding honestly produce subclinical elevations on these scales

Characteristics inherent in these disorders might lead to relationship breakdown and litigious behaviour

Item-structure of the MCMI-III Artificial elevation due to faking-good – we need to

examine this possibility.

Page 6: The Impact of Faking-Good on the MCMI-III: Implications for Family Court Assessments Paul Lenny & Greg Dear Edith Cowan University 2005

Current Study…

Two samples: 60 parents; 78 Students Randomly assigned:

– Honest group: 30 Parents + 33 Students (n=63)– Fake-Good: 30 Parents + 45 Students (n=78)

• Honest Group: Answer as honestly as possible• Fake-Good Group: Imagine you are

undergoing a Family Court Assessment and answer test items to look like a very good parent

Page 7: The Impact of Faking-Good on the MCMI-III: Implications for Family Court Assessments Paul Lenny & Greg Dear Edith Cowan University 2005

Hypotheses and Analysis…

Desirability, Histrionic, Narcissistic & Compulsive scales significantly higher in fake-good group compared to honest group

Disclosure scale significantly lower in fake-good group compared to honest group

t-tests conducted on scales Hypotheses supported

Page 8: The Impact of Faking-Good on the MCMI-III: Implications for Family Court Assessments Paul Lenny & Greg Dear Edith Cowan University 2005

Mean MCMI-III Base Rate Scores for the Current Study Honest Group and

Fake-Good Group

020406080

100D

isclo

su

re-X

Desir

ab

ilit

y-Y

Deb

asem

en

t-Z

Sch

izo

id-1

Avo

idan

t-2A

Dep

ressiv

e-2

B

Dep

en

den

t-3

His

trio

nic

-4

Narc

issis

tic-5

An

tiso

cia

l-6A

Ag

gre

ssiv

e-6

BC

om

pu

lsiv

e-7

Passiv

e-A

gg

ressiv

e-8

A

Self

-Defe

ati

ng

-8B

Sch

izo

typ

al-

S

Bo

rderl

ine-C

Para

no

id-P

An

xie

ty-A

So

mato

form

-H

Bip

ola

r: M

an

ic-N

Dysth

ym

ia-D

Alc

oh

ol

Dep

.-B

Dru

g D

ep

.-T

PT

SD

-R

Th

ou

gh

t D

iso

rder-

SS

Majo

r D

ep

ressio

n-C

C

Delu

sio

nal

Dis

ord

er-

PP

MCMI-III Scales

Me

an

Ba

se

Ra

te

Sc

ore

s

Honest Group (n=63)

Fake-Good Group(n=75)

Mean MCMI-III Base Rate Scores for the Current Study Honest Group and Fake-Good Group

0

1020

30

4050

60

70

8090

100D

isclo

sure

-X

Desirabili

ty-Y

Debasem

ent-

Z

Schiz

oid

-1

Avo

idant-

2A

Depre

ssiv

e-2

B

Dependent-

3

His

trio

nic

-4

Narc

issis

tic-5

Antisocia

l-6A

Aggre

ssiv

e-6

B

Com

puls

ive-7

Passiv

e-A

ggre

ssiv

e-8

A

Self-

Defe

ating-8

B

Schiz

oty

pal-S

Bord

erlin

e-C

Para

noid

-P

Anxie

ty-A

Som

ato

form

-H

Bip

ola

r: M

anic

-N

Dysth

ym

ia-D

Alc

ohol D

ep.-

B

Dru

g D

ep.-

T

PTS

D-R

Thought

Dis

ord

er-

SS

Majo

r D

epre

ssio

n-C

C

Delu

sio

nal D

isord

er-

PP

MCMI-III Scales

Mean

BR

Sco

res Honest Group (n=63)

Fake-Good Group(n=75)

Page 9: The Impact of Faking-Good on the MCMI-III: Implications for Family Court Assessments Paul Lenny & Greg Dear Edith Cowan University 2005

Mean MCMI-III Base Rate Scores of the Current Study Fake-Good Groups Compared to McCann et

al. (2001) Custody Litigants

0102030405060708090

100D

iscl

osur

e-X

Des

irab

ility

-YD

ebas

emen

t-Z

Sch

izoi

d-1

Avo

idan

t-2A

Dep

ress

ive-

2BD

epen

dent

-3H

istr

ioni

c-4

Nar

ciss

istic

-5A

ntis

ocia

l-6A

Agg

ress

ive-

6BC

ompu

lsiv

e-7

Pas

sive

-Agg

ress

ive-

8AS

elf-

Def

eatin

g-8B

Sch

izot

ypal

-SB

orde

rlin

e-C

Par

anoi

d-P

Anx

iety

-AS

omat

ofor

m-H

Bip

olar

: M

anic

-ND

ysth

ymia

-DA

lcoh

ol D

ep.-

BD

rug

Dep

.-T

PT

SD

-RT

houg

ht D

isor

der-

SS

Maj

or D

epre

ssio

n-C

CD

elus

iona

l Dis

orde

r-P

P

MCMI-III Scales

Me

an

Ba

se

Ra

te S

co

res

McCann et al. (2001) CustodyLitigants (n=259)

Current study - Fake-GoodParents (n=45)

Current Study - Fake-GoodStudents (n=30)

Mean MCMI-III Base Rate Scores of the Current Study Fake-Good Groups Compared to McCann et

al. (2001) Custody Litigants

0102030405060708090

100

Dis

clos

ure-

X

Des

irabi

lity-

Y

Deb

asem

ent-

Z

Sch

izoi

d-1

Avo

idan

t-2A

Dep

ress

ive-

2B

Dep

ende

nt-3

His

trio

nic-

4

Nar

ciss

istic

-5

Ant

isoc

ial-6

A

Agg

ress

ive-

6B

Com

puls

ive-

7

Pas

sive

-Agg

ress

ive-

8A

Sel

f-D

efea

ting-

8B

Sch

izot

ypal

-S

Bor

derli

ne-C

Par

anoi

d-P

Anx

iety

-A

Som

atof

orm

-H

Bip

olar

: M

anic

-N

Dys

thym

ia-D

Alc

ohol

Dep

.-B

Dru

g D

ep.-

T

PT

SD

-R

Tho

ught

Dis

orde

r-S

S

Maj

or D

epre

ssio

n-C

C

Del

usio

nal D

isor

der-

PP

MCMI-III Scales

Mea

n B

ase

Rat

e S

core

s

McCann et al. (2001) CustodyLitigants (n=259)

Current study - Fake-GoodParents (n=45)

Current Study - Fake-GoodStudents (n=30)

Mean MCMI-III Base Rate Scores of the Current Study Fake-Good Groups Compared to McCann et al. (2001)

Custody Litigants

0102030405060708090

100D

iscl

osur

e-X

Des

irabi

lity-

Y

Deb

asem

ent-

Z

Sch

izoi

d-1

Avo

idan

t-2A

Dep

ress

ive-

2B

Dep

ende

nt-3

His

trio

nic-

4

Nar

ciss

istic

-5

Ant

isoc

ial-6

A

Agg

ress

ive-

6B

Com

puls

ive-

7

Pas

sive

-Agg

ress

ive-

8A

Sel

f-D

efea

ting-

8B

Sch

izot

ypal

-S

Bor

derli

ne-C

Par

anoi

d-P

Anx

iety

-A

Som

atof

orm

-H

Bip

olar

: M

anic

-N

Dys

thym

ia-D

Alc

ohol

Dep

.-B

Dru

g D

ep.-

T

PT

SD

-R

Tho

ught

Dis

orde

r-S

S

Maj

or D

epre

ssio

n-C

C

Del

usio

nal D

isor

der-

PP

MCMI-III Scales

Me

an

Ba

se R

ate

Sco

res

McCann et al. (2001) CustodyLitigants (n=259)

Current study - Fake-GoodParents (n=45)

Current Study - Fake-GoodStudents (n=30)

Mean MCMI-III Base Rate Scores of the Current Study Fake-Good Group Compared to McCann et al. (2001) Custody

Litigants

0102030405060708090

100D

iscl

osur

e-X

Des

irabi

lity-

Y

Deb

asem

ent-

Z

Sch

izoi

d-1

Avo

idan

t-2A

Dep

ress

ive-

2B

Dep

ende

nt-3

His

trio

nic-

4

Nar

ciss

istic

-5

Ant

isoc

ial-6

A

Agg

ress

ive-

6B

Com

puls

ive-

7

Pas

sive

-Agg

ress

ive-

8A

Sel

f-Def

eatin

g-8B

Sch

izot

ypal

-S

Bor

derli

ne-C

Par

anoi

d-P

Anx

iety

-A

Som

atof

orm

-H

Bip

olar

: M

anic

-N

Dys

thym

ia-D

Alc

ohol

Dep

.-B

Dru

g D

ep.-

T

PTS

D-R

Thou

ght

Dis

orde

r-S

S

Maj

or D

epre

ssio

n-C

C

Del

usio

nal D

isor

der-

PP

MCMI-III Scales

Mea

n B

R S

core

s McCann et al. (2001) CustodyLitigants (n=259)

Current Study Fake-GoodGroup (n=75)

Page 10: The Impact of Faking-Good on the MCMI-III: Implications for Family Court Assessments Paul Lenny & Greg Dear Edith Cowan University 2005

Striking Similarity!

When instructed to look like a very good parent, MCMI-III profile remarkably similar to individuals undergoing a custody evaluation

Profile in this setting likely to be artefact of faking-good and not psychopathology…

However…

Page 11: The Impact of Faking-Good on the MCMI-III: Implications for Family Court Assessments Paul Lenny & Greg Dear Edith Cowan University 2005

Ambiguous profile…

Elevations also seen in honest group Histrionic, Narcissistic, Compulsive individuals

may be more likely to terminate relationship and litigate over custody

MCMI-III item structure and adjustments Difficult profile to interpret Further research necessary