31
The Impact of Competitive The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway Scott Holloway California State University, California State University, Northridge Northridge

The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

The Impact of Competitive The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement PhysicsAdvanced Placement Physics

Scott HollowayScott Holloway

California State University, California State University, NorthridgeNorthridge

Page 2: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

ContextContext

Physics is a serious course with difficult Physics is a serious course with difficult and abstract conceptsand abstract concepts

Few students continue on into careers in Few students continue on into careers in physics or engineeringphysics or engineering

High schools new methods to create High schools new methods to create affinity in physics and related careersaffinity in physics and related careers

Page 3: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

ImportanceImportance

Low achievement scores on the TIMSS and Low achievement scores on the TIMSS and PISA studiesPISA studies

Increased STEM funding has not been Increased STEM funding has not been entirely effectiveentirely effective

Increased opportunity for science careers Increased opportunity for science careers due to advancing technologydue to advancing technology

US economy will suffer if STEM jobs US economy will suffer if STEM jobs continue to move overseascontinue to move overseas

Page 4: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

QuestionsQuestions

Does playing competitive, collaborative, Does playing competitive, collaborative, problem-solving games improve problem-solving games improve achievement for AP physics students?achievement for AP physics students?

Does playing competitive, collaborative, Does playing competitive, collaborative, problem-solving games improve problem-solving games improve attitudes toward physics in AP physics attitudes toward physics in AP physics students?students?

Page 5: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

Literature ReviewLiterature Review

CollaborationCollaboration

CompetitionCompetition

Game playGame play

Page 6: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

CollaborationCollaboration Increased on task behavior (Harris et al., Increased on task behavior (Harris et al.,

2008).2008).

Improved problem solving and reduced Improved problem solving and reduced anxiety (Harskamp and Ding, 2006).anxiety (Harskamp and Ding, 2006).

Group heterogeneity not as important as a Group heterogeneity not as important as a high quality task (Cheng, Lam, & Chan, high quality task (Cheng, Lam, & Chan, 2008). 2008).

Improved social gains and subject affinity Improved social gains and subject affinity (Willis, 2007).(Willis, 2007).

Page 7: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

CompetitionCompetition Creates rivalry and anxiety for many Creates rivalry and anxiety for many

students (McMahon, Wernsman & Rose, students (McMahon, Wernsman & Rose, 2009).2009).

Competition is normal and should be Competition is normal and should be included in education (Ediger, 1996).included in education (Ediger, 1996).

Student activity in formal competition Student activity in formal competition increases similar post-secondary study increases similar post-secondary study (Bishop & Walters, 2007).(Bishop & Walters, 2007).

AP classes are naturally highly competitive AP classes are naturally highly competitive (Deemer, 2004). (Deemer, 2004).

Page 8: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

Game PlayGame Play

Makes complex theoretical knowledge more Makes complex theoretical knowledge more approachable (Kiili, 2007).approachable (Kiili, 2007).

Students report mixed results with math games Students report mixed results with math games (Bragg, 2007).(Bragg, 2007).

Engagement and motivation are benefits of the Engagement and motivation are benefits of the use of games but they are not enough for use of games but they are not enough for educational purposeseducational purposes (Gros, 2007).(Gros, 2007).

Page 9: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

MethodMethod

Who – 79 AP C studentsWho – 79 AP C students Where – Westlake High SchoolWhere – Westlake High School When – Fall 2009, 12 weeksWhen – Fall 2009, 12 weeks What - PhysTecWhat - PhysTec How – How –

– Achievement – test/quiz scoreAchievement – test/quiz score– Attitude – Surveys, Questionnaires and Attitude – Surveys, Questionnaires and

interviewsinterviews

Page 10: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

PhysTecPhysTec

Students were broken into groups of 4-5.Students were broken into groups of 4-5.

Teams attempted to be the quickest to Teams attempted to be the quickest to correctly complete problem solving correctly complete problem solving activities and other AP style problemsactivities and other AP style problems

Points were awarded for correct answers Points were awarded for correct answers and deducted for incorrect or missing and deducted for incorrect or missing answers.answers.

Page 11: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

PhysTecPhysTec

Physics Team Challenge (PhysTec) Physics Team Challenge (PhysTec) designed to:designed to:

– Engage all students in the groupEngage all students in the group– Make students work quickly (under stress)Make students work quickly (under stress)– Rotate student roles within the groupRotate student roles within the group

Page 12: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

PhysTecPhysTec

Example problem:Example problem:

Find the acceleration Find the acceleration for a 6 kg block on a 20 for a 6 kg block on a 20 degree frictionless degree frictionless ramp if the 6 kg block ramp if the 6 kg block is attached to a is attached to a suspended 1.5 kg block suspended 1.5 kg block over a massless, over a massless, frictionless pulleyfrictionless pulley

Page 13: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

PhysTec Key ElementsPhysTec Key Elements

Game designed so:Game designed so:

– all teams can score points and “win”all teams can score points and “win”

– Higher scores earn more extra creditHigher scores earn more extra credit

– Extra credit is minimalExtra credit is minimal 0.5% of overall semester grade.0.5% of overall semester grade.

– No penalty for poor performanceNo penalty for poor performance

Page 14: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

Data CollectionData Collection

Achievement was measured using pre- Achievement was measured using pre- and post- quizzes, and chapter test scores.and post- quizzes, and chapter test scores.

Attitude was measured using pre- and Attitude was measured using pre- and post- surveys, questionnaires and student post- surveys, questionnaires and student interviews.interviews.

Page 15: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

ResultsResults

Achievement results were mixed.Achievement results were mixed.– Test data was inconclusiveTest data was inconclusive– Quiz data showed an increase in Quiz data showed an increase in

achievementachievement

Data on attitude Data on attitude – suggests the PhysTec game improves suggests the PhysTec game improves

and reinforces positive attitudes in and reinforces positive attitudes in physicsphysics

Page 16: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

AchievementAchievement

Test Scores

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5.1 Chapter 5.2

Tests

Av

era

ge

Pe

rce

nt

Period 4

Period 5 PhysTec Introduced for Period 4

PhysTec Introduced for Period 5

Page 17: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

AchievementAchievement

Pre and Post Quiz Results

78

80

82

84

86

88

90

92

94

Quiz ch4 part I pre-game Quiz ch4 part II - post game

Sc

ore

(P

erc

en

t)

Period 4

Period 5

Page 18: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

Impact of PhysTec games on physics attitudes

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

Likert scale responses (1-5)

Nu

mb

er

of

stu

de

nt

res

po

ns

es

(n

=6

8)

creates more fun

creates more interestand engagement

creates betterperformance

Impact on AttitudeImpact on Attitude

Page 19: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

Attitude Toward GamesAttitude Toward Games

Student attitude toward academic games

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

Likert scale responses (1-5)

Nu

mb

er

of

stu

de

nt

res

po

ns

es

(n

=7

4)

Enjoy academicgames

academic gamesenrich myeducation

enjoy academicgames in science

Page 20: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

Impact on AttitudeImpact on Attitude

Impact of PhysTec on negative attitudes toward physics

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

Likert scale responses (1-5)

Nu

mb

er o

f st

ud

ent

resp

on

ses

(n=

68)

games are dullanduninteresting

games causeanxiety

games makeme less likely toparticipate

Page 21: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

Impact on AttitudeImpact on Attitude

Percentage of students who enjoy playing PhysTec (n=69)

No8% Neutral

16%

Yes76%

Page 22: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

Impact on AttitudeImpact on Attitude

Did playing games change your attitude toward physics?

Yes, 32%

Unclear, 12%

No, 55%

Page 23: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

Reasons PhysTec Changed Reasons PhysTec Changed AttitudesAttitudes

““It has helped me visualize the problems It has helped me visualize the problems better.”better.”

““It made me a little more excited about It made me a little more excited about physics, because I was directly applying it.”physics, because I was directly applying it.”

““It was more fun and interesting to talk about It was more fun and interesting to talk about ways to solve different problems with your ways to solve different problems with your fellow classmates.”fellow classmates.”

““It added a new dimension to my viewpoint of It added a new dimension to my viewpoint of physics. I am more excited in the learning physics. I am more excited in the learning realm of Physics C.”realm of Physics C.”

Page 24: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

DiscussionDiscussion

OverviewOverview

LimitationsLimitations

ImplicationsImplications

Future Study PossibilitiesFuture Study Possibilities

Page 25: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

DiscussionDiscussion

Even though their was little extrinsic Even though their was little extrinsic motivation (minimal extra credit) motivation (minimal extra credit) most students engaged in the game most students engaged in the game and enjoyed the learning experience.and enjoyed the learning experience.

Some experienced anxiety that Some experienced anxiety that comes from competition, but that comes from competition, but that was not a limiting factor for most.was not a limiting factor for most.

Page 26: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

DiscussionDiscussion

Academic achievement results may Academic achievement results may have been affected by inappropriate have been affected by inappropriate test designtest design

Recommendations for future studyRecommendations for future study– Use pre and post tests instead of Use pre and post tests instead of

chapter testschapter tests– Compare treatment class to control Compare treatment class to control

groupgroup

Page 27: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

LimitationsLimitations

Students are AP students, most Students are AP students, most taking more than two AP classes, taking more than two AP classes, therefore experienced with therefore experienced with competitioncompetition

Small study groupSmall study group

Only used physics classesOnly used physics classes

Page 28: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

ImplicationsImplications PhysTec adds a dimension of challenge PhysTec adds a dimension of challenge

and fun that promotes positive attitudes in and fun that promotes positive attitudes in physics and may increase the number of physics and may increase the number of students who go on to physics related students who go on to physics related careers.careers.

Due to the positive student response, I will Due to the positive student response, I will be expanding the use of the game to be expanding the use of the game to encompass the entire year. encompass the entire year.

Other subjects could design similar games Other subjects could design similar games and expect the same resultsand expect the same results

Page 29: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

Future StudyFuture Study

Can PhysTec be redesigned to Can PhysTec be redesigned to reduce anxiety?reduce anxiety?

Does PhysTec increase the number Does PhysTec increase the number of students pursuing STEM majors in of students pursuing STEM majors in college?college?

Can PhysTec be modified for use in Can PhysTec be modified for use in other AP classes?other AP classes?

Page 30: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

Final ThoughtFinal Thought One student summed up an opinion about One student summed up an opinion about

PhysTec this way:PhysTec this way:

– ““Competitive group-work is what makes physics class Competitive group-work is what makes physics class stand out from my other 6 periods. Other classes have stand out from my other 6 periods. Other classes have group work but generally no timed competition. When group work but generally no timed competition. When you add the clock, teamwork’s importance is elevated to you add the clock, teamwork’s importance is elevated to a new level. You see people specializing as calculator a new level. You see people specializing as calculator workers, explainers, double-checkers, the hapless workers, explainers, double-checkers, the hapless writers, and (sometimes) the One that misleads the writers, and (sometimes) the One that misleads the whole group. When the whiteboard moves around, the whole group. When the whiteboard moves around, the dynamic constantly changes. When your friends are dynamic constantly changes. When your friends are counting on you, that’s a powerful motivation to study. counting on you, that’s a powerful motivation to study. Physics is not a math class; it’s a puzzle class.” Physics is not a math class; it’s a puzzle class.”

Page 31: The Impact of Competitive Collaborative Game Play on Achievement and Attitude in Advanced Placement Physics Scott Holloway California State University,

A Special Thanks to…A Special Thanks to… My family – Vicki, Caden and Jenna, thanks for My family – Vicki, Caden and Jenna, thanks for

all your patience and supportall your patience and support

My colleagues in the cohort – for all your My colleagues in the cohort – for all your guidance and inspirationguidance and inspiration

My professors – Prof. Rivas, Prof. Herr, Prof. My professors – Prof. Rivas, Prof. Herr, Prof. Foley, and Prof. Cheng, thanks making me a Foley, and Prof. Cheng, thanks making me a better educatorbetter educator

My students – for providing me a reason for My students – for providing me a reason for loving my jobloving my job