Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Geospatial Web: A State of the Art Report
Michael F. GoodchildUniversity of California
Santa Barbara
The Geospatial Web• GeoWeb, Spatial Web• An integration of sensors, servers, and users sharing
geospatial data that is often dynamic and near real-time, and fully interoperable
• Geospatial data– georeferenced descriptions of the Earth’s surface and near-
surface– <x,z>– often aggregated
• statements about lines, areas, volumes
• Geospatial technologies– geographic information systems (GIS), GPS, remote
sensing, RFID
The mashup• New information obtained by linking through
geographic location– visual or logical
fundrace.huffingtonpost.com
Land classification• Land cover, land use, soils, wetlands,…• Incompatible classification schemes
– European Union INSPIRE project– harmonizing classifications across 27 member
states
Georeferencing• The ability to determine location quickly and
easily– most people do not know their latitude and
longitude– what is at:
latitude 34 deg 24 min 42.7 seconds north, 119 deg 52 min 14.4 sec west
236150m easting, 3811560m northing, UTM Zone 11 Northern Hemisphere
National Grid reference 11SKU36151156909 West Campus Lane, Goleta, CA 93117, USA
– the informal world of human discourse meets the formal world of geographic coordinates
http://www.thesalmons.org/lynn/wh-greenwich.html
Digital gazetteers• Alexandria Digital Library (ADL)• GeoNet Names Server (NGA)• Geographic Names Info Sys (USGS)• Thesaurus of Geographic Names (Getty)• Electronic Cultural Atlas Initiative (ECAI)• Expedia, Google, Mapquest, et al.
(underlying, not explicitly accessible)
Digital Gazetteer - Basics
(controlled vocabulary)
Courtesy L. Hill (ADL Gazetteer Team, Feb 2002)
ADEPT, Smith, October 1999
Place-based information challenge
Metadata<!ENTITY % geographic-coordinate "(#PCDATA)"><!-- a geographic latitude in degrees north of the equator or
geographic longitude in degrees east of the Greenwichmeridian, e.g., "-121.025" -->
<!ELEMENT west_bounding_coor %geographic-coordinate;><!ELEMENT east_bounding_coor %geographic-coordinate;><!ELEMENT south_bounding_coor %geographic-coordinate;><!ELEMENT north_bounding_coor %geographic-coordinate;><!ELEMENT measurement_begin_date %calendar-date;>
Search Engines
Cataloging – Metadata Creation
Where is …?What’s there?
What happened there?
HarvestedWebpages
GIS datasets
Oral histories
Georeferencing by placename and by spatial footprint
Aerial photos
Books
Maps
DataPapers
Translation needed between placenames - locations
Gazetteers
Courtesy L. Hill (ADL Gazetteer Team, Feb 2002)
Challenges - conceptual• All attributes of place are multiple
– Names: Lake Tahoe, Tula Tulia– Types: Lake and/or Reservoir– Locations: Lake Tahoe ± Emerald Bay
• Place identity is subjective – a cognitive act– Culturally situated – ethnophysiography - Mark– Time-variant (names & types): Bonneville (now dry)– Evolving knowledge: sub-glacial lakes in Antarctica
Multiple attribution
Plate carre
Shapes
—— ESRI
~~~ USGS
Names
D’aowaga
Lake Tahoe
Sierra Lake
Types
+Water Body
- Lake
- Reservoir
Prioritization• Space first
– only one feature (of a given type) can occupy adefined space during a period of time
• Type second– types are approximate; features are multi-type
• Name third– names are intriguing but essentially arbitrary
Metrics• Geospatial
– point-in-polygon: distance to centroid– polygon-on-polygon: inter-areal overlap
(line features per se do not occur, by use of multihulls)
• Geotaxial (single taxonomy)– hierarchical distance, with “see” and “see also”
• Geonomial– stemming cross-match
How is geographic information created?• By authorities and their experts
– USGS– NGA– Ordnance Survey– military in many countries– state and local governments
• Disseminated to non-expert users– with restrictions– at cost of production or reproduction?– restrictions since 9/11
The formal naming process • U.S. Board on Geographic Names
– 1890• A hierarchy of boards from local to national
– composed of experts– no role for amateurs, the general public
• Need to standardize– to avoid confusion– postal delivery
The Waldseemüller map• St Dié-des-Vosges, 1507• A name that stuck
Volunteered geographic information (VGI)• A phenomenon of the 21st Century
– recent months• User-generated content• Collective intelligence• Crowdsourcing• Asserted information• The empowerment of millions of private citizens
– largely untrained– no obvious reward– no guarantee of truth– no authority
popvssoda.com
www.wikimapia.org
www.wikimapia.org
www.flickr.com
www.openstreetmap.org
Locations in text• Geoparsing• Geotagging with microformats
– mapping Wikipedia• Context-specific
– he was Shanghaied• Ambiguity
– clusters of geotags around Philadelphia NY• metacarta.com
Three types of sensor networks• Inert, fixed• Carried on moving objects
– vehicles– pedestrians
• asthma research• Human beings
– 6 billion intelligent sensors– informed observers– rich local knowledge– uplink technology
• broadband Internet• mobile phone
Citizen science• Networks of amateur observers
– possibly trained, skilled• Christmas Bird Count
– thousands of volunteer participants– protocols
• Project GLOBE– an international network of school children– reporting environmental conditions– central integration and redistribution
Participant populations• Open to all
– Wikimapia, Flickr• Trained or skilled volunteers
– Christmas Bird Count• School children
– GLOBE• Vehicle fleets
– Inrix• Farmers
– precision agriculture• Reversing the traditional top-down flow
Why do people do this?• Self-promotion
– exhibitionism– information remains identified with source
• compare Census• Altruism
– a belief that everything on the Web can be found– and will be used to good effect
• A desire to fill gaps in available data– especially in areas where data are not available– or where access is denied for security
• Sharing with friends, relatives– but accessible by all
The value of VGI• A significant contribution to geography
– enhancing our knowledge of the Earth– local focus– engaging citizens
• Many unresolved questions– trust, credibility– preservation– social psychology
Authority and assertion• Traditional mapping to high quality
– authoritative• The Wikipedia process
– anyone can edit– reviewed by volunteers– Google Maps
• The potential for hybrids– MapCorps
Towards a research agenda• Technical
– conflation– partial correction and update– SOA standards– metadata– quality control and assurance
• Social psychology– trust– who participates?
• engaging under-represented groups– local expertise– thematic expertise– privacy, access rights
Summary points• A rapidly changing world
– very strange to its former leaders• Engagement of the general public
– neogeographers– a willingness to volunteer
• Who are the experts?– we are all local experts
• A more dynamic view of geography– a tradition of leisurely activity
Summary points (2)• Where the informal world meets the formal
– conflation– interoperability
• New sources of geographic knowledge– place references in text– geotagging
• New concepts of data quality– user-generated