-
8/9/2019 The Flow of Malson
1/3
1AC 1NC
Definitions
Environmental policy
Invasive species
Background
A. How species enter an ecosystem (Lodge 09)
B. Lacey Act critically flawed (Lodge 09)
Plan
andates1 ) Reform Lacey Act. Clean/gray/dirty list
2) Risk assessment. Chance of harm, chance of invasion,
benefits
nforcement - feds + LA penalties
unding- User fees + $500 millionJ ustifications1.Th e
Ecology
A. Invasive species pose risk to natives (Lodge 09) a)
Redundancy theory is wrong. (Maser 92)
b) Extinct species are replaced. (Palmer 92)
2. Biod not k2 survival
a) species extinct =/= human extinction (doremus 00)
b) no snowball (sagoff 97)
c) not k2 survival (herland 97)
-
8/9/2019 The Flow of Malson
2/3
1NC 2AC
T policy
. Interp
a) policy - plan of action Part to whole, not the whole
phrase
) res
I. Violation - Aff changes Act of Congress no warrant, no
examples of policy distinction from act
. Standards: A/T Brightline
A. Birghtline to what?
B. Artificial barriersCommon Man
A. need to find how to set
1. Brightline. RTP: B. R2P Common Man
a) Key to def 1) Real world
) Best education 2) Key to brightline
c) Ultimate goal
d) Preserves comm
e) Void for vagueness
f) Key to language
g) Makes T a question of degree
2. Fxt bad
V. Voters III. Voters
1. A priori issue. 1. Negative over-limits
2. Prima facie burden.
3. Destroys debate. Turn - Destorys merit of debate round
4. Sets a bad precedent. Turn - Neg sets bad precedent of
running T on T cases
T enviro-policy
. Interp
I. Violation - non mandates concerning relationship and their We
meet. No warrant.
-
8/9/2019 The Flow of Malson
3/3
1NC 2AC
Adovacy/contradictions
I. Link - His CPs contradict and they are condi
II. Impacts
A) Advocacy.
B) Time Skew
C) Not reciprocal
D) Infinite regression
E) Is a Voter
Clean List Only
andates - no dirty list, only clean list Here's how my case
works
I. Non-T
II. Net Benefits
1. clarity/efficiency True of my case: know what goes where.
2. corruption/lobbying a) no quantification
b) turn - easier to wiggle because of nebulousness
c) tu quoque - undermining is at science, not listing
V. Solvency - see aff No advocacy for clean list only
S tates Clean List
M andates A) gray list feds B) devolve species listing C) 50
states have clean list
I. Non-T
II. Net Benefits A) either it links to his Ks
applying federalism to homeland security is cool Giuliano 07 B)
or it doesn't apply
V. Solvency
Four reasons why states are better (Adler 07) A) Card doesn't
apply - its not specific to interstateB) Won't work. Pet trade
circumvents (Brown 06)
C) Logistical nightmare
