The EU GNSS Programmes: EGNOS, GALILEO Status ...galileo.cs.telespazio.it/metis/public/Damascus GNSS... · Galileo vs GPS & Glonass Navigation solutions powered by Europe # Telemetry,

Navigation solutions powered by Europe

Ugo CelestinoEuropean Commission

Damascus, 8 April 2010

The EU GNSS Programmes: EGNOS, GALILEOStatus & International Cooperation

2

Navigation solutions powered by EuropeContent

• EU GNSS Programmes- Galileo- EGNOS

• International Cooperation

3

Navigation solutions powered by EuropeIntroduction

• Galileo• An autonomous infrastructure• Global coverage• Global Space and Ground elements• Services similar to GPS, plus innovative ones

• EGNOS• Simply improves GPS performances• Coverage: European landmasses• Limited Space and Ground elements• Mainly for aviation users (« Safety-of-Life »)

4

Navigation solutions powered by EuropeEU GNSS Governance

Council

European Commission

Independantadvisors

European Space Agency

IOVcontracts

FOCcontracts

GNSS Supervisory Authority

Political oversight

Programme oversight and Programme Management

Executionde

lega

tion

assi

stanc

e an

dde

lega

tion

European GNSS Programme Committee

European Parliament

Assistance tasks to EC

Tasks delegated by EC

Market preparation

ResearchAccreditation

Others

Council

European Commission

Independantadvisors

European Space Agency

IOVcontracts

FOCcontracts

GNSS Supervisory Authority

Political oversight

Programme oversight and Programme Management

Executionde

lega

tion

assi

stanc

e an

dde

lega

tion

European GNSS Programme Committee

European Parliament

Assistance tasks to EC

Tasks delegated by EC

Market preparation

ResearchAccreditation

Others

Egnos Service Provider

5



GALILEO

6


5 TT&CStations

9 MissionUplink

Stations

European Control Centres

30-40 GalileoSensor Stations

Constellation of 30 MEO Satellites

Users & Service Providers

Galileo System Architecture

7

Navigation solutions powered by EuropeGalileo vs GPS & Glonass

554# Telemetry, Tracking and Control

933# Uplink Stations--1017Plans

30 to 4046Baseline# Monitoring stations

322# Control center

GalileoGlonassGPSGround segment

554# Telemetry, Tracking and Control

933# Uplink Stations--1017Plans

30 to 4046Baseline# Monitoring stations

322# Control center

GalileoGlonassGPSGround segment

More extended to provide more (civilian) services

8

Navigation solutions powered by EuropeGalileo vs GPS & Glonass

14 h11 h12 hPeriod56°65°55°Inclination

23 20019 10020 160Altitude (km)02031Status

302424Baseline# Spacecraft

336# Orbital planesGalileoGlonassGPSSpace Segment

14 h11 h12 hPeriod56°65°55°Inclination

23 20019 10020 160Altitude (km)02031Status

302424Baseline# Spacecraft

336# Orbital planesGalileoGlonassGPSSpace Segment

9


Open Service

Commercial Service

Safety of Life Service

Search and Rescue Service

Free to air; Mass market; Simple positioning

Encrypted; High accuracy; Guaranteed service

Open Service + Integrity of signal

Encrypted; Continuous availability

Near real-time; Precise; Return link

Public RegulatedService

Galileo Services

10


Galileo System Testbed v1Validation of critical algorithms

Galileo System Testbed v22 initial test satellites

In-Orbit Validation4 IOV satellites plus

ground segment

Initial Open Service, Search & Rescue Service, Public Regulated Service

minimum 18 satellites

2003

2005/07

2010/11

2014

Galileo Implementation PlanAll services30 satellites

2016/17

11


Cordoba GSS

Troll GSS

Alaska GSS

Hawaii GSS

Papeete ULS/GSS Easter Island GSS

Washington GSS

Svalbard ULS/GSS

Kiruna TTC

Redu GSS

Fucino GSS

Riyadh GSS

Reunion ULS/GSS

South Africa GSS

KourouTTC/ULS/GSS

Perth GSS

New Caledonia ULS/GSS

S. Korea GSS

Sensor StationsUp-Link stationsTT&C stationsControl Centres

Galileo IOV Ground Segment Sites

12


30-4020Sensor Stations

52TT&C Stations

95Mission Uplink Stations

31Control Centres

27(+3)4Satellites

FOC PhaseIOV PhaseComponent

IOV (In Orbit Validation), FOC (Full Operational Capability)

Galileo IOV vs FOC

2011 2016/17

13


Fucino (IT)

Oberpfaffenhofen (DE)

Credits: ESA

Galileo IOV Control Centres

14


Kiruna Galileo TTC Site Completed (Nov 2007)

Svalbard Galileo ULS/GSS Site Completed (May 2008)

Credits: ESA

Galileo IOV Ground Segment Sites

15


• Infrastructure procurement divided in 6 workpackages

• Tender launched on July 1, 2008• Candidates have been shortlisted (see table)• WP1, WP4 and WP5 : contracts were signed on

January 26, 2010• WP2, WP3 and WP6 : competitive dialogue is under

way; award decisions in 2010

Galileo FOC Procurement

16


• Astrium (UK) • G-Nav: Lockheed Martin IS&S (UK)

3. Ground Control Segment

• Arianespace (FR)5. Launch Services

• Opal: DLR (DE) and Telespazio (IT)• Nav-Up: Inmarsat, VEGA, BT

6. Operations

• Astrium (DE) • OHB System (DE ): 14 satellites

4. Space Segment

• ThalesAleniaSpace (FR) • Logica (UK)

2. Ground Mission Segment

• ThalesAleniaSpace (IT) • Logica (NL)

1. System Support

Retained Candidates (winners in green)Work Package

Galileo Procurement – candidate suppliers

17


• 2009IOV : ground infrastructure deploymentsFOC : first procurement contracts awarded (system support services, first 14 satellites, launchers)

• 2010IOV : first two operational satellites to be launched in Dec 2010FOC : remaining procurements contracts to be awarded in 2010

• 2011IOV : third and fourth satellites to be launched in 2011FOC : ground infrastructure deployments

• 2012 onwardsProgressive FOC deployment with step-wise service introduction as of 2014 (Open Service, Search And Rescue Service, Public Regulated Service)

Galileo Programme Status

18

Navigation solutions powered by EuropeGalileo Challenges

• Finalise contracts for 3 workpackages• Mission• Control• Operations

• Decide on launcher options• Ensure security accreditation of ground stations• Complete budget for FOC• Decision PRS access rules• Launch 2 « IOV » satellites around 2010 year end

19


‘It’s there, use it’

EGNOS

20


Users &ServiceProviders

3 GEOSatellites

2 Support Facilities

6 NavigationLand EarthStations

4 MissionControlCentres

EGNOS System Architecture

34 Ranging & Integrity MonitoringStations (RIMS) GPS signals

21

Navigation solutions powered by EuropeEGNOS improves GPS over Europe

GPS and GLONASS Satellite Constellation

GPS position accuracy

Navigation Land Earth Station (NLES):…uplinks error corrections to EGNOS satellites…

EGNOS Geo-stationary Satellite…relays error corrections to users…

EGNOS position accuracy

Ranging and Integrity Monitoring Stations (RIMS) : …receive GPS data & send to MCC…

Mission Control Centre (MCC)…processes GPS data to

determine errors…

22


EGNOS Satellite Footprints

RIMS … Ranging & Integrity Monitoring Stations (some additional RIMS are not in view)

EGNOS RIMS Location

23


GPS D-GPS SBAS(EGNOS)

EGNOS improvement on precision

West

South

North

East

True position =

Positions potentiallygiven by receiver

24


Compliance with SLA when commercialisation will start

Compliance with ICAO standards (certification)

None

Guarantee of Service

Ground network

L1 frequency

L1 frequency

Transmission Means

Corrections provided by terrestrial network allow for sub-meter accuracy locally or regionally through additional processing

Same accuracy as Open Service. SoL service levels compliant to ICAO SARPS definition for APV1

Typical vertical and horizontal positioning accuracy in the centre of Europe around 1m(spec: 3m horizontal, 4m vertical)

Accuracy

Experimental service available; Official service to be made available in 2011

Service to be made available in November 2010

Service available since October 2009

Service Status

Commercial Service (EDAS)

Safety of Life Service

Open Service

Service

EGNOS Services – Current Status

Guarantee of service is key

25

Navigation solutions powered by EuropeEGNOS Performance - availability

Nearly 100% availability for an extended period

26

Navigation solutions powered by EuropeEGNOS Performance - coverage

Deployment of additional RIMS in North-East-South Europe, Northern Africa, Middle East will increase availability area of APV-1

27


HPE … Horizontal Precision Error, HPL … Horizontal Protection Level

Source: http://www.egnos-pro.esa.int/IMAGEtech/perfect/real_time/view_all/toulouse.html

EGNOS Performance - integrity

With around 1 m (blue line), the measured Horizontal Precision Error in Europe is

consistently better than the requirements

28


EGNOSService Area

EGNOS SatelliteFootprints

Soon replaced by:- INMARSAT 4F2- SIRIUS 5- ASTRA 5B

3 Geostationary satellitesINMARSAT 3F2 AOR-E (15.5°W), ARTEMIS (21.3°E), INMARSAT 3F5 IOR-W (25°E)

EGNOS coverage goes beyond EU

29


• 2009:Assets were transferred to the European Union on April 1, 2009Open Service declaration took place on Oct 1, 2009Long-term operator contract was signed on Oct 1, 2009Procurement to replace the transponder on Artemis is finalized (Astra Sirius 5 to be launched in Nov 2011)Procurement to replace the transponder on Inmarsat 4F2 is ongoing (Astra 5B to be launched in June 2013)Free testing of Commercial Service by Industry & AcademiaGeographical extension to Africa under study

• 2010:Safety-of-Life Service declaration planned for November 1, after certificationCommercial Service declaration planned for 2011

EGNOS Programme status

30


• Before EGNOS can be used for safety critical operations, it should be demonstrated that it is designed and operated in a safe manner

• Certification requirements baseline: Single European Sky Regulatory package:

Interoperability Regulation (EC No 552/2004)Service Provision Regulation (EC No 550/2004) –Provision of air navigation services in the Single European SkyCommission Regulation (EC No 2096/2005) –ANSP certification process Safety Oversight Regulation (EC No1315/2007)

EGNOS Certification

31


• Allows for IFR-like operation in non ILS-equipped airports • Increase in airports capacity• Increase in safety• Increase in flight capability (e.g. helicopters)• Expensive land based navaids can be avoided• Enables their long term decommissioning => lower

terminal charges

• General operational benefits• Reduction in angle of

approach (direct and curved)

• Better lateral guidance• EGNOS enables a

reduction in the decision height

EGNOS benefits in aviation

EGNOS competitive space

32

Navigation solutions powered by EuropeEGNOS Challenges

• Ensure certification of operator for SoL• Complete ECAC coverage• Remove obsolescences• Manage the assets

• Frequency Evolution• Evolution of Standards

• Augmentation of new GNSS

• LPV200 service level

• Maintain EGNOS over the long term

• Capture economic opportunities downstream, in aviation and beyond

33

Navigation solutions powered by EuropeEU GNSS Budget 2007-2013: 3.5Bn€

GNSS budget allocations 2007-2013 (in M€)

57,5

42618,5 307 20

2.645

Galileo ESA DelegationAgreement

Other operationalexpenses

Galileo IOV DelegationAgreement

Administrativeexpenditure

EGNOS

Public regulated servicepilot project

34


International Cooperation

35

Navigation solutions powered by EuropeCooperation: diverse intensity and scope

General

Country orRegionspecific

• Agreements with:Norway, Switzerland, USA, South Korea, Ukraine, Morocco, other ad hoc for Galileo GS, other underdiscussion

• Galileo/EGNOS applications development

• R & D

• Multilateral:Founding member of UN International Committee on GNSS & Providers Forum, candidate to host ICG in 2010

• Regional training centers: Asia, Africa, Latin America

• EGNOS modular extension

• Compatibility• Interoperability

• Standardisation• Trade matters

36


• Ensure compatibility at a minimum: ability of space-based PNT services to be used separately or together without interfering with each individual service or signal, and without adversely affecting national security

Radio frequency compatibility (ITU provides a framework)Spectral separation between PRS and other signals

• Compatibility is a MUSTOnce Compatibility has been achieved, interoperability can be addressed

EU Objectives in Bi/Multi-lateral Coordination

37


• Galileo encourages interoperability between Galileo open signals (OS, SoL and CS) and other space-based PNT signals when desirable for the benefits of users

Focus on E1 CBOC (MBOC), AltBOC E5 (which includes E5a & E5b) and E6 CS signalsCommon maximum power level is a necessary aspect of Interoperability (and compatibility)Highest minimum power level is a desired aspect as well

EU Objectives in Bi/Multi-lateral Coordination

38


• Definition of interoperability?• Technical: same center frequency, same modulation,

commonly agreed maximum power level, geodetic reference frames realization and system time reference

• Non-technical: transparency and availability of open information on signals (e.g. SIS ICD), availability of open information on performance standards and actual performance

• ICG (International Committee GNSS) should work on the definition of consolidated “boundary conditions” to achieve interoperability

Outstanding Issues on Interoperability

39


• 2004 Agreement: plenary session held in October 2008 Radio-frequency compatibility and interoperability: commonMBOC civil signal on GPS L1C – Galileo E1 open serviceTrade and civil applicationsDesign and development of the next generationSecurity and International aspects

EU – US Agreement

40


• 2003 Agreement: regular steering Committee meetingsRun by MOST and European CommissionBeidou/Compass was not involved until recently

• Technical Working Group regular meetings to addressthe compatibility and interoperability between Galileo and Compass

• Industrial Working Group regular meetings to addressindustrial cooperation

China – EU Agreement

41


• Regular meetings to address the compatibility and interoperability of IRNSS and GAGAN with Galileo and EGNOS

India – EU Draft Agreement

42


• Under the hospices of the EU RF Space Dialogue• Regular meetings to address the compatibility and

interoperability of GLONASS and SDCM with Galileo and EGNOS

• Draft Agreement under discussion

Russian Federation – EU Discussions

43


• Regular meetings to address the compatibility and interoperabilityof QZSS with Galileo

Good prospect for an E6 CS / QZSS Lex interoperable signal• Draft Agreement under consideration

Japan – EU Discussions

44

Navigation solutions powered by EuropeR&D for applications/service development

GNSS market

Technical

Aw-T-Demo

Enablers

Regulatory

MEDA 1

4,5M[2006-09]

2M

2,5M

MEDA 2

4,5M[36 months]

1,6M

0,2M

0,8M

1,9M

GeneralAviation

Mobile LBSRoad navigation

Road charging & safety critical

Maritime & multi modal

RailProfessional

Non-EU partners usually join consortia

25M[First Call FP7]

40M[ Second Call FP7]

45


EGNOSService Area

EGNOS SatelliteFootprints

Potential EGNOS extensions

Depending on the extension area, technical implementationmay vary from:

Homogeneous extension with deployment of additional RIMSRegional infrastructure including additional processing capabilities

S. Africa

Arabic peninsula

W. Africa

Northern-East Europe

MEDA Extension

To be further evaluated

46


EGNOS enters its operational phase• EGNOS Open Service since Oct 2009• EGNOS Safety-of Life-Service in 2010

Galileo is progressing, at the crossing between the development (IOV) and deployment (FOC) phases

• GIOVE-A, GIOVE-B missions on-going• FOC procurement on-going• First two operational satellites in 2010• OS, S&R Service, PRS as of 2014

International cooperation is importantGALILEO:

- Secure ground infrastructure- Compatibility as a minimum, interoperability desired- Enable new services provision, free trade and fair

access to markets worldwideEGNOS:

- Leverage EU investment to service other areas- Applications development on common standards

Conclusions


Thank you for your attentionFurther information:

http://www.satellite-navigation.eu/

Input and questions are [email protected]

Documents

The EU GNSS Programmes: EGNOS, GALILEO Status ...galileo.cs.telespazio.it/metis/public/Damascus GNSS... · Galileo vs GPS & Glonass Navigation solutions powered by Europe # Telemetry,