39
OXFORD INSTITUTE ENERGY STUDIES - FOR- The Economic Consequences of the Fall in Future Energy Demand in the Arab World Robert Mabro Oxford Institute for Energy Studies F4 1985

The Economic Consequences of the Fall in Future Energy

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

OXFORD INSTITUTE

E N E R G Y STUDIES

- FOR-

The Economic Consequences of the Fall in

Future Energy Demand in the Arab World

Robert Mabro

Oxford Institute for Energy Studies

F4

1985

THE ECOHCMIC COHSEQUERCES OF TEE F U IB FUTWE EBBBGY DIMBaD Il? THE ARAB WORLD

Paper presented a t the Third Arab Energy

Conference, 4-9th May 1985, Algiers.

Also, published in the Middle East Economic Survey, 13 t h Hay 1985,

Vol. mIII, no. 31

F4

OxPOBD IBISTITTRE FOR ENERGY STUDIES

1985

The contents of this paper are for the purposes of study and d i s c u s s i o n and do not represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members.

Copyright 0 1984 Oxford I n s t i t u t e for Energy Studies

ISBN 0 948061 09 X

TAELE OF CORTERTS

1. INTRODUCTION

2. THE OIL DEMAND SHOCK

3 . THE OIL DEMAND AND O I L PRICES I N 1985-1990 13

4. THE CASE FOR FAVOURABLE IMPLICATIONS 20

5 . TBE UNFAVOURABLE IMPLICATIONS 28

6 . CONCLUDING REMARKS 32

F

TABLES

Table 1 Oil Production i n Major Arab Oil-Export ing Countries

2 O i l Revenues of Arab OPEC Member Countries

3 Rates of Growth of Main Economic Indicators

10

14

31

The economic development of t he Arab r eg ion i n r ecen t

years has become h e a v i l y dependent on the fo r tunes of o i l . The

sudden and s i g n i f i c a n t i n c r e a s e s in o i l p r i c e s and r e v e n u e s of

1973/74 and 1979180 have had a cons ide rab le impact on t h e l e v e l s

and p a t t e r n s of economic development i n the o i l - expor t ing and i n

the non-oil coun t r i e s of t he Arab world.

The o i l e x p o r t e r s a c h i e v e d h i g h r a t e s o f economic

growth , and some of them, p a r t i c u l a r l y t h e Gulf c o u n t r i e s and

Libya enjoyed the b e n e f i t s of h igh l e v e l s of per c a p i t a incomes.

O i l was r e s p o n s i b l e f o r fundamental changes i n the s t r u c t u r e of

t h e i r economies and the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h e i r s o c i e t i e s .

The economies became i m p o r t - o r i e n t e d , a d e v e l o p m e n t

which induced a c o n s i d e r a b l e e x p a n s i o n of t h e s e r v i c e s s e c t o r ,

a n d a v i r t u a l a n n i h i l a t i o n o f t r a d i t i o n a l a c t i v i t i e s i n

a g r i c u l t u r e , f i s h e r i e s , h a n d i c r a f t s , s m a l l - s c a l e t r a d i n g and

manufacturing. Governments were a b l e t o devote huge r e sources t o

investment and a s p e c i f i c p a t t e r n of c a p i t a l format ion began t o

emerge. Much money was spent on t h e t r a n s p o r t i n f r a s t r u c t u r e , on

t e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s , h o u s i n g , and on s o c i a l s e r v i c e s , m a i n l y

educat ion and hea l th . Some coun t r i e s were unable t o absorb a l l

o f t h e i r r e v e n u e s d o m e s t i c a l l y , and p l a c e d s u r p l u s f u n d s i n

1

p o r t f o l i o s of fo re ign assets h e l d abroad. Product ive investments

i n t h e d o m e s t i c economy t ended t o b e c o n c e n t r a t e d i n t h e heavy

indus t ry s e c t o r , mainly i n t he process ing of hydrocarbons and i n

energy-intensive metal i n d u s t r i e s .

O i l revenues f i l t e r e d through government expendi tures

t o the p r i v a t e sec tor . A v a r i e t y of r e d i s t r i b u t i o n mechanisms - con t rac t s , high-wage government employment, purchases and g i f t s

of land , ex tens ion of c r e d i t f a c i l i t i e s a t low o r ze ro r a t e s of

i n t e r e s t e t c . - l ed t o the c r e a t i o n of p r i v a t e fo r tunes .

Rapid economic d e v e l o p m e n t and h i g h r a t e s of income

growth were r e s p o n s i b l e for a b i g i n c r e a s e i n t h e demand f o r

labour which soon outs t r ipped l o c a l manpower a v a i l a b i l i t i e s . The

labour gap was f i l l e d by inf lows of migrants from neighbouring

Arab c o u n t r i e s , from Asia and t o a lesser ex ten t from Europe and

t h e USA. Manpower s h o r t a g e s were not o n l y e x p e r i e n c e d by t h e

u n d e r - p o p u l a t e d c o u n t r i e s of t h e G u l f , t h e y a l s o a f f e c t e d

coun t r i e s w i t h r e l a t i v e l y l a r g e popula t ions such as I r a q .

O i l wea l th shaped s o c i a l a t t i t u d e s towards consumption,

i n v e s t m e n t , employment and b u s i n e s s 1 i f e . The d e m o n s t r a t i o n

e f f e c t , which we may d e f i n e i n t h i s context a s an und i sc ip l ined

u r g e t o a d o p t and i m i t a t e t h e consumpt ion p a t t e r n s of r i c h

i n d u s t r i a l i z e d c o u n t r i e s , a f f e c t e d t h e s e s o c i e t i e s . The

r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n g o v e r n m e n t s and c i t i z e n s a l t e r e d .

Governments , b e i n g i n r e c e i p t of t h e p r o c e e d s o f o i l w e a l t h

incur red the ob1 i g a t i o n t o r e d i s t r i b u t e revenues t o t h e i r people ,

and c i t i z e n s were l e d t o e x p e c t government b o u n t i e s as an

i n a l i e n a b l e r i g h t . The phenomenon of r i s i n g expec ta t ions became

an i m p o r t a n t c h a r a c t e r i s t i c of s o c i a l a t t i t u d e s . I n some

2

i n s t a n c e s t h e f r u s t r a t i o n caused by u n f u l f i l l e d e x p e c t a t i o n s

caused tens ions and l a t e n t r i f t s .

The re i s no doub t t h a t o i l bestowed c o n s i d e r a b l e

b e n e f i t s on the expor t ing count r ies . The g a i n s from investments

i n t h e i n f r a s t r u c t u r e , from the expansion of educat ion and h e a l t h

f a c i l i t i e s , from improved housing, p u b l i c u t i l i t i e s , t r a n s p o r t

and s o c i a l s e r v i c e s , from b e t t e r n u t r i t i o n and higher l e v e l s of

consumer’s wel fa re a r e both s i g n i f i c a n t and extremely valuable .

O i l a l s o had an impact on the economic development of

Arab S t a t e s which h a v e l i t t l e or no h y d r o c a r b o n r e s o u r c e s .

C o u n t r i e s such a s Egypt , T u n i s i a and S y r i a , wh ich a r e minor oil

expor t e r s , gained d i r e c t l y from the f a v o u r a b l e change i n t h e i r

terms of t r a d e . They a l s o g a i n e d , t o g e t h e r w i t h n o n - o i l

economies such as Jordan, t he Sudan, t he Yemens and Morocco, from

t h e d e v e l o p m e n t of c l o s e r economic l i n k s w i t h t h e major o i l -

e x p o r t i n g c o u n t r i e s . These economic r e l a t i o n s h i p s i n c l u d e d

m i g r a t i o n , a i d f l o w s , d i r e c t i n v e s t m e n t s and some i n c r e a s e s i n

t r a d e . The major c o n t r i b u t i o n of o i l t o t h e i r economies came

from the remit tances of migrants .

I t i s f a i r t o s ay t h a t i n t h e 1970s and e a r l y 1 9 8 O s ,

e i t h e r d i r e c t l y o r i n d i r e c t l y , o i l became t h e dominant f a c t o r of

economic growth and d e v e l o p m e n t throughout t h e Arab region, i n

both major o i l - expor t ing and non-oil coun t r i e s . This f a c t o r made

p o s i t i v e con t r ibu t ions and had some n e g a t i v e o r adverse e f f e c t s .

It is important t o recognize t h a t a l though the ba lance shee t of

o i l i n v o l v e s c r e d i t s a s w e l l as d e b i t s , t h e g a i n s were much

l a r g e r t h a n t h e l o s s e s . However, t h e oil s i t u a t i o n r a d i c a l l y

3

changed a t the beginning of t he 1980s. There w a s a cons ide rab le

f a 1 1 in t h e demand f o r OPEC o i l , f rom a peak of 30-31 m i l 1 i o n

b a r r e l s a day i n 1979 t o a trough of 16-17 m i l l i o n b a r r e l s a day

in 1984/85. The volume of o i l p r o d u c t i o n i n t h e Arab w o r l d

dec l ined in t h a t per iod from 21 mb/d t o about 10 mb/d ( see Table

1). T h i s d r o p i n demand w a s accompanied by a f a 1 1 i n p r i c e . In

1982 t h e o f f i c i a l p r i c e of Arabian Light, t h e OPEC marker crude,

was $ 3 4 / b ; i n March 1983 t h i s p r i c e was r e d u c e d t o $29 and i n

January 1985 to $28/b. The combined e f f e c t of volume and p r i c e

d e c l i n e on revenues is cons iderable . Many f o r e c a s t s p r e d i c t t h a t

t h i s s t a t e of a f f a i r s - low l e v e l s of demand and weak p r i c e s -

w i l l c o n t i n u e t h r o u g h o u t t h e 1980s and p e r h a p s u n t i l t h e mid-

1990s.

This paper is concerned wi th the imp l i ca t ions f o r t he

economic development of t h e Arab world of t h i s f a l l i n t he demand

f o r o i l which c a u s e s a s i g n i f i c a n t r e d u c t i o n i n r e v e n u e s . The

i s s u e s a r e complex b e c a u s e t h e economic e f f e c t s of o i l , a s

s u g g e s t e d e a r l i e r on, i n v o l v e p o s i t i v e a s w e l l a s n e g a t i v e

elements. Fur ther , o i l i s a d e p l e t a b l e resource , and one cannot

be c e r t a i n without very c a r e f u l cons ide ra t ion whether a r educ t ion

i n the ra te of e x t r a c t i o n i s f a v o u r a b l e o r adve r se t o t he long-

term economic i n t e r e s t s of t h e export ing coun t r i e s .

We propose t o a p p r o a c h t h e s u b j e c t i n t h e f o l l o w i n g

manner. We s h a l l f i r s t d e s c r i b e the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h e o i l

demand shock which has l e d t o a s m a l l d r o p in o i l p r i c e s and a

cons ide rab le reduct ion i n OPEC revenues (Sec t ion 2). In Sect ion

3, t h e l i k e l y t r e n d s o f f u t u r e o i l demand f o r Arab o i l , p r i c e s

and revenues w i l l be assessed. We s h a l l then ask t h e ques t ion of

4

whether t h i s r e d u c t i o n i n demand has some m e r i t s and may be

construed as a “bless ing i n d isguise” (Section 4). In Section 5

the main economic and p o l i t i c a l implications of the o i l demand

c r i s i s w i l l be d i s c u s s e d , and i n S e c t i o n 6 some t e n t a t i v e

conclusions w i l l be drawn.

5

The 1970s has become known i n o i l h i s t o r y a s t h e decade

of t h e p r i c e shocks; i n the same v e i n t h e 1980s w i l l undoubtedly

be r e f e r r e d t o as t h e decade of t he demand shock. The changes i n

t h e b e h a v i o u r of o i l demand which began i n 1980 a f f e c t e d i n a

u n i q u e way OPEC Member C o u n t r i e s b e c a u s e t h e O r g a n i z a t i o n

c o n t i n u e d t o p l a y t h e r o l e of t h e r e s i d u a l o i l s u p p l i e r t o t h e

wor Id.

The per fo rmance of t h i s r o l e caused OPEC t o i n c r e a s e

i t s o i l p r o d u c t i o n a t a v e r y h i g h r a t e i n t h e twenty years

l e a d i n g t o 1973; and t h i s r e l e n t l e s s growth i n o i l o u t p u t t h e n

r a i s e d l e g i t i m a t e f e a r s a b o u t t h e f a s t d e p l e t i o n o f p r e c i o u s

p e t r o l e u m r e s o u r c e s . High r a t e s of e x t r a c t i o n , which were

r a p i d l y reducing t h e l i f e of remaining r e s e r v e s t o 30 or 40 years

i n t h e p r o l i f i c Gu l f r e g i o n , were c o n s i d e r e d by many o b s e r v e r s

and by the governments themselves as undes i rab le . Most Arab o i l -

expor t ing coun t r i e s were unable t o absorb the revenues generated

by t h e r i s i n g volumes of o i l expor t s i n t o product ive inves tments

w i t h i n t h e n a t i o n a l economy. The h i g h e x t r a c t i o n r a t e s were

d e p l e t i n g a r e a l asset and r e p l a c i n g it by a f o r e i g n p o r t f o l i o of

p a p e r a s se t s s u b j e c t t o t h e v a g a r i e s of i n f l a t i o n , c u r r e n c y

f l u c t u a t i o n changes in r a t e s of i n t e r e s t , and t o t h e r i s k s of

6

d e f a u l t o r e x p r o p r i a t i o n . More f u n d a m e n t a l l y t h e Arab o i l

e x p o r t e r s were a w a r e t h a t t h e t i m e h o r i z o n o f e c o n o m i c

development was exceedingly long because t h e i r coun t r i e s su f fe red

from se r ious imbalances i n r e sources and from a lops ided economic

s t ruc tu re , Many o i l - expor t ing coun t r i e s have a small popula t ion

r e l a t i v e t o o t h e r f a c t o r s of p r o d u c t i o n s u c h as f i n a n c i a l

c a p i t a l . I n mos t o f them t h e a g r i c u l t u r a l s e c t o r was

unproduct ive because of a sho r t age of water and of s u i t a b l e l and ;

indus t ry was v i r t u a l l y non-exis tent a t t he beginning of t he o i l

e r a because of poverty and under-development; and the s e r v i c e s

were geared t o the l imi ted needs of small popu la t ion se t t lements .

Given t h e s e i n i t i a l condi t ions economic deve 1 opment i s bound t o

be a very long process. In t h i s context , t he conse rva t ion of o i l

resources f o r t he purpose of f i nanc ing development ove r s e v e r a l

decades becomes a v i t a l economic and p o l i t i c a l o b j e c t i v e .

As swing p r o d u c e r s t h e OPEC c o u n t r i e s were f o r c e d t o

e x t r a c t t o o much o i l in t h e y e a r s l e a d i n g t o 1973 and i n t h e

per iod 1973-1979. Today, through t h e i r performing t h e same r o l e ,

they f i n d themselves on a s h a r p l y d e c l i n i n g output trend. This

r e v e r s a l i s s o sudden and so r a p i d as t o g i v e rise t o s e r i o u s

w o r r i e s a b o u t i t s economic e f f e c t s . D i s q u i e t a b o u t h i g h

d e p l e t i o n r a t e s which may c o n s t r a i n t h e f i n a n c i n g of economic

development i n the d i s t a n t f u t u r e has now g i v e n way t o d i s q u i e t

a b o u t r a p i d r e d u c t i o n s i n r e v e n u e s and in marke t s h a r e s which

c o n s t r a i n the f inanc ing of economic development i n the immediate

f u t u r e .

To s u g g e s t t h a t t h i s change i n t h e c o u r s e of demand

should be welcome because i t removes e a r l i e r wor r i e s about r ap id

7

d o e s n o t do f u l l j u s t i c e to t h e problem. We h a v e

acknowledged t h a t t h e p r o d u c t i o n l e v e l s a t t a i n e d i n t h e 1970s

were d e t r i m e n t a l t o t h e i n t e r e s t s of o i l - expor t ing coun t r i e s ; but

t h e remedy f o r t h i s u n s a t i s f a c t o r y s i t u a t i o n i s not t o be found

i n t h i s sudden r e d u c t i o n i n o u t p u t b r o u g h t a b o u t b y outside

f o r c e s on which t h e p r o d u c e r s t h e m s e l v e s h a v e l i t t l e or no

con t ro l .

The roo t of a l l problems l i e s i n t h e r o l e of r e s i d u a l

s u p p l i e r which OPEC i s o b l i g e d t o perform on i t s own without h e l p

from non-OPEC producers. This r o l e makes i t imposs ib le f o r OPEC

members t o d e t e r m i n e f o r t h e m s e l v e s a p r o d u c t i o n p o l i c y

c o n s i s t e n t w i th t h e i r development ob jec t ives . They have neve r

been i n a p o s i t i o n t o d e f i n e an optimal product ion path, and they

have n o t succeeded i n r e g u l a t i n g demand through jud ic ious p r i c i n g

p o l i c i e s in such a way as t o avoid too r a p i d a r a t e of growth or

too sha rp a ra te of dec l ine . In t h e 1960s, o i l p r i c e s were kept

low because OPEC's barga in ing power v i s - a -v i s t h e oil companies

and t h e ma jo r consuming c o u n t r i e s was v e r y weak. I n t h e l a t e

1970s , t h e second o i l p r i c e shock s e n t p r i c e s w e l l a b o v e the

l e v e l r equ i r ed for an opt imal adjustment of f u t u r e o i l demand.

Whether OPEC cou ld have ac ted d i f f e r e n t l y i n 1979-80,

g i v e n t h a t o i l buyers played an a c t i v e p a r t i n b idding p r i c e s up

b e c a u s e of s u p p l y u n c e r t a i n t i e s and sudden changes i n t he

s t r u c t u r e of t h e petroleum market, is a moot question. Whatever

t h e answer t o t h i s ques t ion , t h e f a c t i s t h a t demand f o r OPEC o i l

has d e c l i n e d by almost 45% i n fou r years, and our main concern i s

about t h e imp l i ca t ions and consequences of t h i s b r u t a l f a c t .

8

The mechanism through which the demand f o r OPEC o i l has

s u f f e r e d such a b i g r educ t ion i s f a m i l i a r . The s t agna t ion of t h e

world economy i n r e c e n t years (which should not be a t t r i b u t e d t o

t h e o i l p r i c e rises on t h e i r own but t o a combination of f a c t o r s

i n wh ich t h e economic p o l i c y of t h e major OECD c o u n t r i e s p l a y s

t h e most i m p o r t a n t p a r t ) and t h e r i s e s i n e n e r g y p r i c e s (which

a r e c l o s e l y a s s o c i a t e d t o t h e o i l p r i c e i n c r e a s e s ) h a v e

d r a s t i c a l l y reduced the growth of world energy consumption. High

p r i c e s h a v e encouraged c o n s e r v a t i o n or g r e a t e r e f f i c i e n c y i n

e n e r g y u s e , and economic s t a g n a t i o n h a s e l i m i n a t e d t h e income

p u l l o n demand. The l a c k of growth i n e n e r g y demand d o e s n o t

e x p l a i n by i t s e l f t he f a l l i n t he demand for OPEC o i l . Two o t h e r

f a c t o r s p l a y e d a major p a r t . The f i r s t i s a change i n t h e

s t r u c t u r e of energy s u p p l i e s wi th c o a l , n u c l e a r and, t o a l e s s e r

e x t e n t , gas growing a t t h e expense of o i l . T h i s s t r u c t u r a l

change was p a r t l y due t o t h e e f f e c t s of r e l a t i v e p r i c e s and

p a r t l y t o p o l i c i e s implemented by consuming coun t r i e s i n order t o

reduce t h e i r dependence on o i l imports. The second f a c t o r i s t h e

growth of non-OPEC o i l product ion p a r t i c u l a r l y i n the North Sea,

Mexico, South-Eas t A s i a b u t a l s o i n a l a r g e number of s m a l l

producing countr ies . I n sho r t , t he demand f o r OPEC o i l s u f f e r e d

a doub le squeeze, one from the growth of non-oi l energy s u p p l i e s

and t h e o the r from the expansion of non-OPEC o i l production.

The ex ten t of t h e o i l product ion d e c l i n e (as f a r as t he

Arab member coun t r i e s of OPEC a r e concerned) i s apparent from t h e

f i g u r e s p r e s e n t e d i n T a b l e 1. Between 1973 and 1978 t h e t o t a l

o i l product ion of t h e seven coun t r i e s l i s t e d f l u c t u a t e d s l i g h t l y

a round 18 rnbld. The i n c r e a s e of o i l o u t p u t t o t h e much h i g h e r

9

m (U .rl U U G 5 0 U

h 0 .rl U U 0 P X w I d *rl 0

P d U 4 U 0

a E: E:

P

-4

G 0 .rl U c1 1 a 0 N PI

4 .rl 0

d

a, l-4 Q Id H

N m N

0 4

QI m r-

4 4

m rD rD

d

0 0 VI

N

ul * d

N

0 N 0

el

Q\ CO Q\

N

U .rl d 3

b4 a

0 m 00

4

4 Q\ 0

N

N m m d

e t- 4

N

CO 4 m m

c,

4

F rd h U .d A

ri 0 h

4

0 m 00

d

a el Q\

4

eJ m m

4

m r- h

0

W 4 P

I I 1 I I I

I I I I I I

1 1 1 I 1 1

1 I I I I I

L I I I I I

.. .. el Qo o\ ri

I o e

l e v e l o f 21 mb/d i n 1979 was e n t i r e l y due t o t h e I r a n i a n

Revolut ion. As r e s i d u a l s u p p l i e r s w i t h i n OPEC i t s e l f t he Arab

coun t r i e s made up f o r t he s h o r t f a l l i n I r a n i a n production.

Thus, t h e 1979 product ion l e v e l should be construed as

excep t iona l ; i t cannot be taken a s a base f o r t h e measurement of

t h e subsequent dec l ine . It would be more appropr ia te t o t a k e a

product ion volume of 18 mb/d (1973-1978) as our re ference p o i n t

and t o measure t h e r e d u c t i o n i n oil o u t p u t a g a i n s t t h i s

benchmark. We f i n d t h a t t he reduct ion remains very s i g n i f i c a n t :

i n 1 9 8 4 a c t u a l p r o d u c t i o n was 45% be low t h e r e f e r e n c e l e v e l !

Arab o i l product ion w a s v i r t u a l l y ha lved in 3 t o 4 years.

The p a r a l l e l c o l l a p s e i n o i l revenues i s documented in

T a b l e 2. A b a s e l i n e o r a r e f e r e n c e is r e q u i r e d t o a s s e s s t h i s

d e c l i n e i n revenues. It would c l e a r l y be mis leading t o t a k e t h e

peak y e a r of 1980 w i t h r e v e n u e s of a b o u t $205 b i l l i o n as t h e

s t andpo in t from which changes are t o be measured. The base l i n e

for revenues should be cons i s t en t with the product ion r e fe rence

l e v e l which w e have s e t a t 18 mb/d. We es t ima te the base l e v e l

of o i l r e v e n u e s a t $172 b i l l i o n on t h e a s sumpt ion t h a t t h e

a v e r a g e p e r b a r r e l p r i c e is $28 and t h a t t h e a v e r a g e vo lume o f

domestic o i l consumption i n the seven Arab coun t r i e s considered

is 1.1 mb/d. On t h i s b a s i s , it appears t h a t a revenue s h o r t f a l l

emerged i n 1982, and t h a t it increased s u b s t a n t i a l l y i n 1983 and

1984.

The s h o r t f a l l from our n o t i o n a l base l i n e ($172b) and

from peak revenues i n 1980 ($205.7b) is as f o l l o w s (US$ b i l l i o n ) :

11

Year Revenue shor t fa l l from peak (1980)

Revenue shortf a1 1 from reference 1 ine

1981

1982

1983

1984

19

70.7

108.7

108.2

(14.7)

37

75

74.5

No f u r t h e r e l a b o r a t i o n i s requ ired . The s i m p l e and

stark f a c t i s that the demand shock of 1981-84 has had rapid and

s i g n i f i c a n t effects on the o i l revenues of the seven Arab member

countries of OPEC.

12

3, OIL DEHAHD Bw OIL PRICES ZR 1985-1990

A study of t he economic impl i ca t ions of changes i n the

demand for Arab o i l r equ i r e s a f o r e c a s t of l i k e l y t r ends in t h e

coming y e a r s . T h e r e is an abundance of ene rgy and o i l demand

p r o j e c t i o n s t o 1990, 1995 and t h e year 2000. But t h e t r a c k

r e c o r d of o i l f o r e c a s t e r s h a s been s o bad i n t h e p a s t twenty

years ( p a r t i c u l a r l y when they concerned themselves w i t h demand)

t h a t w e d o n o t f e e l v e r y c o n f i d e n t w i t h t h e i r more r e c e n t

p r o j e c t ions.

Y e t w e h a v e no o p t i o n but t o u s e e x i s t i n g m a t e r i a l

s i n c e any new f o r e c a s t w i l l be l i a b l e t o t h e same objec t ions . I n

order t o reduce the r i s k of s e r i o u s misjudgments w e s h a l l proceed

c a u t i o u s l y s u b j e c t i n g both the methodology of f o r e c a s t s and t h e i r

r e s u l t s t o q u a l i f i c a t i o n s and c r i t i c a l a n a l y s i s .

L e t us t a k e as our base the behaviour of t o t a l p r imary

energy consumpt ion i n t h e w o r l d o u t s i d e t h e c e n t r a l l y p l a n n e d

economies a t t h e beginning of t h i s decade.

There w a s a marked d e c l i n e i n world energy consumption

i n 1979-1983, w h i l e i n e a r l i e r years growth was t h e d i s t i n c t i v e

f ea tu re . Between 1979 and 1983, primary energy consumption f e l l

by some 4.25%; b u t i t i s n o t i c e a b l e t h a t t h e r a t e of f a l l h a s

t ended t o d e c r e a s e a f t e r a s h a r p s t a r t i n 1979180. Many

13

U1 PI -4 $4 U c 3 0 U

b PI P

01 c U w h 0

0 a $4 4 rcI 0

m aJ 3 G W 3 W c4

a

d -4 0

N

W rl

tu h

e

o o o o c \ 1 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m r - m m o o o l n

4 r - 4

f/ 4

f 1 4

O o m O N m o o o I c I o o I v r o h r n n C O r n O h 0 m O O I c I r - N O r -

m

N m * N 4

rn m e

14

o b s e r v e r s b e l i e v e t h a t t h e downward trend i n p r i m a r y energy

consumpt ion h a s bottomed out. I n million t o n n e s of o i l

e q u i v a l e n t , p r imary energy consumption was:

Year

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

L e t U no1 C ns i d r

Primary Energy mtoe

4769

4695

4642

4573

4568

r o j e c t i o n s of t h e g owth f

primary energy consumption for t he per iod 1985-2000 made by t h r e e

d i f f e r e n t i n s t i t u t i o n s . The p r o j e c t i o n s considered are those of

( a ) t h e OECD/ZEA, (b) 8 major o i l company and ( c ) an i n d e p e n d e n t

consul tan t .

OECD/IfA i n t h e i r study World Energy Outlook publ i shed

in 1982 p r e s e n t h i g h and low demand p r o j e c t i o n s f o r t h e OECD

r e g i o n . The growth r a t e s of p r imary ene rgy consumpt ion a re a s

f 01 lows :

1985-1990 1990-2000

High Demand 2.3% 2.7%

Low Demand 1.7X 1.8%

O E C D / I E A i s more c a u t i o u s about i t s p r o j e c t i o n s o f

p r i m a r y energy consumption in deve lop ing coun t r i e s (OPEC and non-

OPEC) acknowledging the ex i s t ence of cons ide rab le u n c e r t a i n t i e s .

Thei r estimates f o r 1980-2000 put t he l i k e l y growth ra tes i n the

r a n g e of 4.9-5.7% p e r annum in non-OPEC d e v e l o p i n g c o u n t r i e s .

15

For OPEC coun t r i e s t h e i r e s t ima te is 5.9-7.3% per annum f o r 1985-

1990, and 5.5-5.92 i n 1990-2000. Assuming t h a t t h e r e l a t i v e

w e i g h t s of OPEC and non-OPEC in energy consumpt ion a r e of t h e

order of 0.3 and 0.7 t h i s would y i e l d the f o l l o w i n g growth r a t e s

f o r the t h i r d world a s a whole:

1980-1985 1985-1990 1990-2000

Third World 5.6-6.7 5.2-6.2 5.1-5.7

As a c t u a l d a t a for 1980-83 a r e now a v a i l a b l e one can

t e n t a t i v e l y a s s e s s t h e v a l i d i t y of t h e e s t i m a t e f o r t h e f i r s t

period. It appears t h a t t h e a c t u a l growth ra te i n 1980-83 was of

t he o rde r of 3.4-3.52 per annum, w e l l ou t s ide t h e pro jec ted range

of 5.6-6.7% f o r 1980-85. As i t i s d o u b t f u l t h a t g rowth i n 1984

and 1985 would compensate for t h i s very l a r g e discrepancy w e can

but i n f e r t h a t t he O E C D l I E A p r o j e c t i o n s f o r t he t h i r d world a r e

exceedingly op t imis t i c .

The major oil company i n a study completed i n 1983 put

t he r a t e of growth of primary energy consumption between 1983 and

2000 a t 2.3% p e r annum i n t h e wor I d o u t s i d e c e n t r a l l y p l a n n e d

economies. The IEA/OECD low demand case has 1.7-1.8% i n OECD and

mid -po in t e s t i m a t e s of 5.4-5.7% f o r t h e t h i r d w o r l d . The

we igh ted a v e r a g e f o r t h e w o r l d o u t s i d e c e n t r a l l y p l a n n e d

economies is of t h e o r d e r of 2.5-2.7%. Even in i t s low demand

case OECDlIEA i s more o p t i m i s t i c than the major o i l company.

More r ecen t p r o j e c t i o n s by an independent i n t e r n a t i o n a l

c o n s u l t a n t (1984) p u t t h e growth r a t e i n 1985-2000 a t 2.22 p e r

annum. The e s t i m a t e is c l o s e t o t h a t of t h e ma jo r o i l company

though m a r g i n a l l y lower. C l e a r l y more r ecen t f o r e c a s t s tend t o

be more pess imis t i c than e a r l i e r ones. Our own judgment is t h a t

t h e p r o b a b l e r a n g e of f u t u r e g rowth r a t e s of pr imary e n e r g y

consumpt ion is 2.0-2.4% p e r annum. These a v e r a g e r a t e s may

c o n c e a l , however , c o n s i d e r a b l e s h o r t - t e r m v a r i a t i o n s t h a t a r e

l i k e l y t o ob ta in dur ing 1985-2000.

P r o j e c t i o n s of pr imary e n e r g y consumpt ion a r e j u s t a

f i r s t step t owards a f o r e c a s t of demand f o r OPEC and Arab o i l .

The OECD/IEA study e s t ima tes OPEC s u p p l i e s as f o l l o w s (mbld):

1985 1990 2000

OPEC supply 23 - 26 27-29 24-28

Call on OPEC 23-26 27-33 33-49

There i s no doubt t h a t t hese p r o j e c t i o n s a r e a l r e a d y out of l i n e

for 1985, s i n c e OPEC p r o d u c t i o n unde r t h e most f a v o u r a b l e

c o n d i t i o n s i s u n l i k e l y to exceed 18-19 mb/d i n t h a t y e a r . It

seems t h a t t he OECD/IEA f o r e c a s t s should be discarded d e s p i t e t h e

a u t h o r i t y of t h e i r authors .

The major o i l company r e f e r r e d t o above p r o j e c t s OPEC's

product ion a s f o l l o w s :

1985-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000

OPEC supply 20-21 21-23 25-27

Call on OPEC o i l 20-21 21-23 27

The f o r e c a s t provided by t h e i n t e r n a t i o n a l c o n s u l t a n t

OPEC's s u p p l y i s e x p e c t e d i s c l o s e t o t h a t of t h e o i l company.

by t h e consu l t an t t o reach 22 mb/d in 1990, and 27 mb/d i n 2000.

T a k i n g t h e two l a t t e r f o r e c a s t s (company and

c o n s u l t a n t ) a s t h e more p l a u s i b l e p i c t u r e of f u t u r e t r e n d s , we

17

e s t i m a t e c r u d e o i l p r o d u c t i o n of

1985-2000 as f o l l o w s :

1985

Alger i a 0.70

Iraq 1.70"

Kuwait 1 .oo Libyan A.J . 1.10

Qatar 0.30

Saudi Arabia 4.70

UAE 1.10

T o t a l

T o t a l OPEC

10.60

18.50

t h e Arab members of OPEC i n

1990

0.70

2.75

1.15

1.15

0 .30

4.70

1.25

12.00

21 .00

2000

0.60

4.00

1 S O

1.50

0.15

8.00

1.80

17.55

27 .OO

* I n c l u d e s Kuwait and S a u d i Arabia 's p r o d u c t i o n on b e h a l f of Iraq.

This shows s m a l l increases i n Arab product ion between

1985 and 1990 and a more s i g n i f i c a n t r i s e towards the end of t h e

1990s. However, Arab o i l p r o d u c t i o n w i l l b a r e l y r e a c h i n year

2000 t h e l e v e l of 18.0 mb/d p o s t u l a t e d e a r l i e r on a s t h e

r e fe rence for asses s ing changes.

Our o i l p r i c e f o r e c a s t , a t c o n s t a n t 1985 d o l l a r s ,

assumes no rises u n t i l 1992. I n f a c t real p r i c e s may d i p between

1985 and 1 9 8 8 / 9 and t h e n r e c o v e r i n 1992 to t h e i r 1985 l e v e l .

A f t e r 1992 o i l p r i c e s may r ise s i g n i f i c a n t l y reaching $40-45 (in

cons tan t 1985 terms) by year 2000.

A r e v e n u e f o r e c a s t ( a t 1985 c o n s t a n t d o l l a r s ) i s

presented below.

T h i s f o r e c a s t s u g g e s t s t h a t the o i l r e v e n u e s of Arab

members of OPEC w i l l no t r e t u r n t o the base l e v e l of $172/b u n t i l

l a t e i n t h e 1990s. Meanwhile o i l r e v e n u e s ( a t 1985 c o n s t a n t

d o l l a r s ) could w e l l f a l l down by 50% from t h i s base v a l u e before

they s t a g e up a slow recovery.

1985 1988 1990 1992 2000

Output mb/d 10.60 11.00 12.00 13.50 17.55

Domestic Con- 1.16 1.27 1.35 1.46 2.00 sumpt ion mb/d

Exports mb/d 9.44 9.73 10.65 12.04 15.55

P r i c e $/b ( cons t an t 27.5 25.0 26 .O 27.5 40 .0 1985 d o l l a r s )

Gross revenues $/b 94.75 88.8 101.0 120.8 227.0

The d r o p i n r e v e n u e can now be p u t into p e r s p e c t i v e .

The d e c l i n e starts i n 1982 and i s e x p e c t e d t o bo t tom o u t i n

198819 but t he subsequent upswing s t r e t c h e s ove r t e n years. It

i s only i n 1997 that revenues (measured i n r e a l terms) r ecove r t o

t h e r e f e r e n c e l e v e l . The p r e d i c t e d d u r a t i o n of t h e " r evenue

c r i s i s " i s t h e r e f o r e very long being est imated, from beginning t o

end, a t 15 years.

19

4. THE CASE FOB FAVOUBdllLE IIZPLICATIOWS

Is it p o s s i b l e t o argue t h a t t h e f a l l i n o i l revenues

is a b l e s s i n g i n d i s g u i s e ? Such an argument was made by

d i s t ingu i shed and a u t h o r i t a t i v e p e r s o n a l i t i e s and the reasoning

they proposed d id not l a c k e i t h e r mer i t or convic t ion . Whether

t h e same p e r s o n a l i t i e s would de fend t h e c a s e today , now t h a t

p e r c e p t i o n s a b o u t t h e d e p t h and t h e p o s s i b l e d u r a t i o n of t h e

r e v e n u e c r i s i s h a v e s h a r p e n e d so much, is a moot q u e s t i o n .

Indeed, t he percept ions have s i g n i f i c a n t l y changed. I n 1982, t h e

f a 1 1 i n r e v e n u e s was p a i n f u l b u t n o t d r a m a t i c , and t h e g e n e r a l

expec ta t ion w a s t h a t t h e c r i s i s would t ake the form of a s a l u t a r y

b u t temporary shock. Today i t i s more d i f f i c u l t t o see t h e

s i l v e r l i n i n g of t he c loud because the shock has turned out t o be

deep , and i t s e f f e c t s a r e e x p e c t e d t o be f e l t o v e r a v e r y l o n g

per iod of time.

The " s i l v e r l i n i n g " theory rests on two propos i t i ons ,

though most of i t s proponents u s u a l l y chose t o s t ress one or t h e

o the r bu t r a r e l y both.

The F i r s t p r o p o s i t i o n h a s a l r e a d y b e e n d i s c u s s e d i n

S e c t i o n 2 of t h i s pape r . It f o c u s s e s on t h e i s s u e of r a p i d

d e p l e t i o n of o i l r e s e r v e s . A f a l l i n o i l demand ( t h e f a l l in

revenues being s i m p l y i t s consequence) e n a b l e s Arab coun t r i e s t o

20

c o n s e r v e t h e i r n a t u r a l r e s o u r c e s and t o b r ing e x t r a c t i o n r a t e s

c l o s e t o an optimum path.

However, t he poin t about conse rva t ion of resources i s

t h a t it should be a mat te r of e x p l i c i t po l i cy on t h e p a r t of t h e

producing count r ies , no t t he r e s u l t of e x t e r n a l fo rces on which

they have no con t ro l . The l i k e l i h o o d t h a t t hese o u t s i d e f a c t o r s

w i l l determine product ion rates c l o s e t o the l e v e l s d e s i r e d by

the o i l expor t e r s (given t h e s i z e of t h e i r r e s e r v e s , t h e l e n g t h

of t h e i r development horizon and o the r r e l e v a n t c o n s t r a i n t s ) i s

v i r t u a l l y n i l . A s we have seen, Arab o i l producers were induced

t o p r o d u c e much more t h a n t h e i r p r e f e r r e d vo lumes in t h e 1 9 6 0 s

and 1 9 7 0 s . It a l s o seems t h a t t h e e x p e c t e d p r o d u c t i o n p a t h

throughout t he 1981- la te 1990s c y c l e w i l l be a t times w e l l below

t h e d e s i r e d l e v e l s .

It is d i f f i c u l t t o b e more p r e c i s e on t h i s i s s u e

b e c a u s e v e r y few c o u n t r i e s h a v e a c l e a r l y d e f i n e d d e p l e t i o n

ob jec t ive . Kuwai t is t h e only s i g n i f i c a n t except ion a s t h e r e a r e

a u t h o r i t a t i v e s ta tements on record (Shaikh A l i K h a l i f a A 1 Sabah

t o t h e O x f o r d E n e r g y S e m i n a r i n 1980) s u g g e s t i n g t h a t a

r e s e r v e / p r o d u c t i o n r a t i o of 100 y e a r s is t h e government 's

p r e f e r r e d g o a l . Saud i Arabia's v i e w s on t h i s i s s u e a r e l e s s

c l e a r l y s t a t e d , a l though i t s dec i s ion i n the l a t e 1970s t o set a

maximum a l l o w a b l e o u t p u t l e v e l a t 8.5 mb/d may b e t a k e n a s an

i n d i c a t i o n of an i m p l i c i t d e p l e t i o n pol icy .

Our c o n c l u s i o n is t h a t t h e f a l l i n w o r l d demand f o r

Arab o i l , though i n v o l v i n g by n e c e s s i t y g r e a t e r conse rva t ion of

r e s o u r c e s , h a s n o t y e t made a n a p p r o p r i a t e c o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e

d e p l e t i o n issue. OPEC - and by impl i ca t ion , i t s Arab members -

21

a r e s t i l l p e r f o r m i n g t h e r o l e of a r e s i d u a l s u p p l i e r , a r o l e

which e f f e c t i v e l y p r e v e n t s them from choosing and fo l lowing t h e i r

p re fe r r ed e x t r a c t i o n rates.

The second p r o p o s i t i o n which unde r 1 i e s t h e " s i 1 v e r

l i n i n g " argument i s t h a t t h e sudden i n c r e a s e i n o i l wea l th of t he

1970s has caused was te fu l expendi ture , g r e a t se l f - indulgence i n

matters of economic p o l icy, d e s t a b i l i z i n g expec ta t ions and s o c i a l

t e n s i o n s . The r e d u c t i o n i n r e v e n u e s can b e s e i z e d upon a s an

o p p o r t u n i t y f o r improv ing t h e economic management of t h e o i l -

expor t ing country and f o r s t e e r i n g economic development onto an

e f f i c i e n t pa th .

The re i s much f o r c e i n t h i s a rgument b u t i t may n o t b e

accepted without a few q u a l i f i c a t i o n s .

It is t r u e t h a t t h e sudden a c c r u a l of o i l wea l th i n t h e

1 9 7 0 s caused economic p r o b l erns and s o c i a l t e n s i o n s which h a v e

reduced i ts obvious bene f i t s . Put b l u n t l y t h e immediate b e n e f i t

o f oil w e a l t h r e l a t e s t o h i g h e r i n v e s t m e n t and h i g h e r

consumption. The u t i l i t a r i a n v i ew of economics i s t h a t t h e

p u r p o s e of d e v e l o p m e n t i s t o r a i s e t h e l e v e l of p r e s e n t

consumpt ion ( t h r o u g h income growth) and t h e expected l e v e l s of

f u t u r e consumption ( t h r o u g h i n v e s t m e n t ) . A more s o p h i s t i c a t e d

v i ew emphas izes two f u r t h e r a s p e c t s of d e v e l o p m e n t : ( a )

q u a l i t a t i v e and s t r u c t u r a l changes i n t h e economy and (b) an

enhanced a b i l i t y t o s u s t a i n economic g rowth i n t h e long-run .

These two aspec t s a r e obv ious ly r e l a t e d because the a b i l i t y t o

s u s t a i n growth o f t e n depends on a f u n d a m e n t a l s t r u c t u r a l

t ransformat ion of t he o i l economy.

22

The sudden a c c r u a l of o i l w e a l t h i n t h e 1970s w a s

d i f f i c u l t t o a b s o r b immedia t e ly as i t caused some s h o r t - t e r m

problems of i n f l a t i o n , t r anspor t b o t t l e n e c k s , land s p e c u l a t i o n

e tc . These were t h a n k f u l l y overcome w i t h i n a few years but more

fundamental problems arose which proved d i f f i c u l t t o t ack le .

The f i r s t p r o b l e m w a s c o n s i d e r a b l e i n v e s t m e n t

e x p e n d i t u r e i n w a s t e f u l p r o j e c t s . These do not o n l y i n c l u d e

p r o j e c t s undertaken f o r p r e s t i g e reasons o r t o s e r v e t h e purpose

of conspicuous consumption. Waste was incur red because p lanning

a u t h o r i t i e s and o t h e r dec is ion-making a g e n c i e s l a c k e d t h e t i m e

and r e s o u r c e s t o s t u d y t h e economics of p r o j e c t s and t o e n s u r e

t h a t investments would carry a p o s i t i v e r a t e of r e tu rn .

The argument t h a t a f a l l in o i l r e v e n u e s need n o t

r ep resen t an e q u i v a l e n t l o s s t o the economy t a k e s i n t o account

expendi ture on t hese uneconomical p ro jec t s . I f o i l revenues a r e

wasted i n p a r t t hen t h e r e a l drop in o i l income (so long as t h i s

d r o p i s due t o q u a n t i t y and n o t p r i c e ) i s n o t as l a r g e as i t m a y

appea r . On t h e c o n t r a r y , i t is p r e f e r a b l e t o p r o d u c e l e s s o i l

than t o exchange a d d i t i o n a l volumes f o r was te fu l p r o j e c t s which

d r a i n r e s o u r c e s away f rom t h e economy i n s t e a d o f g e n e r a t i n g

economic re turns .

The second problem is was te fu l c u r r e n t expendi ture by

governments. These m a y i nc lude e x c e s s i v e spending on defense, as

happened i n I r a n d u r i n g t h e 1970s; u n n e c e s s a r y e x p a n s i o n of

government employment; payment of l a r g e commissions € o r agents

of c o n t r a c t o r s ; p u r c h a s e s of l a n d a t i n f l a t e d p r i c e s f o r

subsequent resale a t lower p r i c e s ; l a r g e s u b s i d i e s t o va r ious

a c t i v i t i e s i nc lud ing i n t e r e s t f r e e loans etc.

23

Once a g a i n a f a l l i n o i l r e v e n u e s which wou-ld cause

gove rnmen t s t o c u r t a i l t h e s e e x p e n d i t u r e s can b e c o n s t r u e d a s

b e n e f i c i a l . Incremental o i l i s b e t t e r conserved than spent away

i n was tefu l expenditure.

The t h i r d p r o b l e m i s t h a t o i l r i c h e s i n h i b i t e d

governments from adopting sound economic p o l i c i e s i n ma t t e r s of

t a x a t i o n , ene rgy and food p r i c i n g , i n t e r e s t r a t e s e tc . Good

economics r e q u i r e s commodities t o be pr iced a t t h e i r oppor tuni ty

c o s t s i n order t o avoid m i s a l l o c a t i o n of resources. Most o i l -

e x p o r t i n g c o u n t r i e s p r i c e o i l , g a s and e l e c t r i c i t y i n t h e

d o m e s t i c economy a t a smal l f r a c t i o n of t h e i r t r u e o p p o r t u n i t y

cos t , thus encouraging high r a t e s of was te fu l consumption. This

p o l i c y is sometimes ex tended t o s t a p l e food and water. The

j u s t i f i c a t i o n o f t e n g iven which r e l a t e s t o income r e d i s t r i b u t i o n

and s o c i a l w e l f a r e i s n o t v a l i d . P r i c i n g p o l i c y is n o t t h e

appropr i a t e instrument f o r i m p l e m e n t i n g t h e s e o b j e c t i v e s . The

sound approach is t o a 1 low pr ices t o perform e f f i c i e n t l y t h e i r

r o l e i n t h e a l l o c a t i o n of r e s o u r c e s and t o u s e t a x e s and

subs id i e s f o r t h e purposes of income o r weal th d i s t r i b u t i o n and

o the r s o c i a l o b j e c t i v e s .

If t h e f a l l i n o i l r e v e n u e s f o r c e s g o v e r n m e n t s t o

r e v i s e t h e i r p r i c i n g p o l i c i e s and t o in t roduce a t a x a t i o n system

which would d e v e l o p (a h i t h e r t o non-exis tent) f i s c a l d i s c i p l i n e ,

t h e n one c o u l d say t h a t t h e c l o u d h a s a s i l v e r l i n i n g . Such

reforms a r e necessary f o r t he purpose of long-term developments.

The f o u r t h p rob lem i s t h a t t h e sudden a c c r u a l of o i l

revenues and t h e concomitant r ise i n expendi ture has induced such

24

r a p i d s o c i a l t r a n s f o r m a t i o n a s t o s t r a i n s o c i e t y ' s a b i l i t y t o

r e spond t o changes and t o a d a p t t o new c i r c u m s t a n c e s . These

changes i n v o l v e d a f a s t r a t e of i n t e r n a l m i g r a t i o n f rom r u r a l

a r e a s t o towns and a h i g h i n f l o w of e m i g r a n t worke r s . They

changed a t t i t u d e s towards work, educat ion and t h e a c q u i s i t i o n of

w e a l t h , a n d t h e y p u t u n d e r s t r a i n f a m i l y and s o c i a l

r e l a t i o n s h i p s . The f a 1 1 in o i l revenues, because i t n e c e s s a r i l y

s l o w s t h e p a c e of income g rowth , m a y p r o v i d e a b r e a t h i n g s p a c e

and a l l o w soc ie ty the t i m e it needs t o absorb t h e r e v o l u t i o n a r y

changes of t h e 1970s.

The f i f t h p rob lem i s t h a t t h e o i l p r i c e e x p l o s i o n of

t h e p rev ious decade has induced expec ta t ions of cont inuing income

growth a t very h igh r a t e s which a r e t o t a l l y unsus ta inable . These

expec ta t ions have d i s t o r t e d t h e percept ions of f u t u r e prospec ts

and f o s t e r e d an u n r e a l i s t i c understanding of what an o i l economy

- g i v e n i t s lopsided s t r u c t u r e and i t s l a c k of non-oi l resources

- could poss ib ly achieve. I n t h a t sense the f a l l in o i l revenues

i s a sober ing experience which may lower expec ta t ions and focus

p e r c e p t i o n s on t h e r e a l i s t i c p r o s p e c t s of f u t u r e economic

development. The medicine may be b i t t e r but s a l u t a r y consider ing

t h a t those r i s i n g expec ta t ions which can never be f u l f i l l e d o r

s a t i s f i e d tend t o d e - s t a b i l i z e the soc ie ty .

As mentioned e a r l i e r on, t h i s 1 i n e of r e a s o n i n g h a s

c o n s i d e r a b l e m e r i t s ; y e t some q u a l i f i c a t i o n s a r e i n o r d e r .

F i r s t , w e s h o u l d n o t e x p e c t t h a t t h e f a 1 1 i n r e v e n u e w i l l h e l p

governments t o do away wi th a l l was t e fu l inves tments and w a s t e f u l

cu r ren t expenditure. Undoubtedly some progress w i l l be achieved

on t h i s f r o n t b u t major d i f f i c u l t i e s may b e e n c o u n t e r e d on t h e

25

road to improvements. Although investments w i l l i n e v i t a b l y be

c u r t a i l e d , t h e r e i s no g u a r a n t e e t h a t good p r o j e c t s would

s u r v i v e and uneconomic p ro jec t s would be re jec ted . Such an

o u t come r e q u i r e s cons i d e r a b 1 e improvements i n t h e economic

d e c i s i o n - m a k i n g p r o c e s s ; y e t t h e f a l l in r e v e n u e s wh ich

c o n s t r a i n s t h e p u r s e d o e s n o t n e c e s s a r i l y t r a n s f o r m t h e

p r o f e s s i o n a l a b i l i t y of p l anne r s and o the r r e l e v a n t a u t h o r i t i e s .

V e r y o f t e n bad p r o j e c t s are undertaken i n response to p r e s s u r e s

from powerful groups w i t h a ves ted i n t e r e s t i n s p e c i f i c ventures .

These groups w i l l cont inue t o exe rc i se an i n f l u e n c e and lobby f o r

some of t h e i r favoured p r o j e c t s d e s p i t e the f a l l in revenues.

Fur ther , many governments i n t h e Arab world w i l l f i n d

i t d i f f i c u l t t o c u r t a i l d e f e n s e e x p e n d i t u r e s g i v e n t h e l o n g -

s tanding Arab-Israel i conf 1 i c t and the con t inua t ion of t he I raq-

I r a n w a r . F u r t h e r , much of Arab a i d s u p p o r t s f e l l o w Arab

c o u n t r i e s ( i n c l u d i n g P a l e s t i n e ) w h i c h a r e e i t h e r o n t h e

conf ron ta t ion l i n e with Israel o r engaged i n t h e Gulf war. V i t a l

p o l i t i c a l o b j e c t i v e s may c o n s t r a i n t h e a b i l i t y of Arab o i l

e x p o r t e r s t o r e d u c e t h i s a id . In o r d e r t o make room for

e s s e n t i a l defense and a i d expendi tures , development budgets may

have to be d r a s t i c a l l y cut.

I t i s t r u e t h a t t h e f a l l in r e v e n u e s may i m p r o v e

economic p o l i c i e s . In f a c t , modest s t e p s have a l r e a d y been t aken

i n t h i s d i r e c t i o n i n s e v e r a l Arab o i l - expor t ing countr ies . The

domest ic p r i c e s of f u e l s have been r a i s e d in some p l a c e s and some

i n d i r e c t p r i c e subs id i e s reduced. But governments, however w e 1 1-

disposed on t h e s e matters, are c o n s t r a i n e d p o l i t i c a l l y b e c a u s e

26

t h e p o p u l a t i o n h a s become accustomed t o low p r i c e s and would

r e s e n t changes t h a t may reduce s tandards of l i v i n g . The i s sue

c a n b e v e r y s e n s i t i v e and i t i s e a s y t o u n d e r s t a n d why

government s hes it a t e t o imp0 s e unpopu 1 a r me asur e s . W e a r e i n c l i n e d t o t h i n k t h a t t h e s t r o n g a rgumen t s i n

f avour of t he " s i l v e r l i n i n g " theory r e l a t e t o problems of s o c i a l

changes and r e a l i s t i c expectat ions. Arab soc ie ty needs t i m e t o

a d j u s t t o t he r a p i d t ransformat ion of t h e 1970s, and a per iod of

t i m e i n which t h e pace of growth slows down may be b e n e f i c i a l i f

p u t t o good u s e . I t is u p t o g o v e r n m e n t s t o s e i z e t h i s

o p p o r t u n i t y and t o u s e i t for r e a l i s t i c and e f f i c i e n t

a d j u s t m e n t s . I t i s e s s e n t i a l , however , t o a v o i d t h e e x t r e m e

s o l u t i o n of l e t t i n g t h e r a t e of economic growth d r o p s u d d e n l y

from a h i g h t o a v e r y low l e v e l . Such a f a l l c a n c a u s e s o c i a l

t e n s i o n s a n d e c o n o m i c d i s t o r t i o n s , as s e r i o u s i n t h e i r

consequences as t h o s e c r e a t e d by a sudden a c c e l e r a t i o n i n

economic growth. It is also important t o take advantage of t h e

oppor tuni ty t o d e f i n e t h e long-term development o b j e c t i v e s of t h e

country and t o choose a f e a s i b l e and d e s i r a b l e p a t t e r n of s o c i a l

and economic changes. The w o r s t outcome i s f o r gove rnmen t s

e i t h e r t o panic o r t o remain pass ive .

27

r v enu

5 . THE UFlFhVOUBBBLE IWLICATIORS

We ment ioned e a r l i e r on t h a t t h e r e d u c t i o n i n o i l

i n t h e 1980s and e a r l y 1990s i s e x p e c t e d t o be

s i g n i f i c a n t and t o a f f e c t o i l economies ove r a f a i r l y long per iod

of t i m e . Unf avourab le economic consequences ar ise because of the

a n t i c i p a t e d l e n g t h and depth of t he o i l demand c r i s i s .

The economic e f f e c t s m a i n l y r e l a t e to t h e r a t e s of

economic g rowth and t h e r a t e s of c a p i t a l a c c u m u l a t i o n . T h e i r

adverse impact extends ou t s ide the main o i l - impor t ing coun t r i e s

because o the r Arab na t ions depend t o some e x t e n t on the fo r tune

of oil. Some ( l i k e Egypt , B a h r a i n , Oman, S y r i a or T u n i s i a ) a r e

themselves o i l exporters . They a r e cushioned a g a i n s t a volume-

induced f a l l i n r e v e n u e s b e c a u s e they a r e n o t bound by O P E C

q u o t a s and a r e a b l e t o maximize o u t p u t and e x p o r t s , b u t t h e y

s u f f e r from reduc t ions i n the p r i c e of o i l which are themselves a

consequence of t h e demand c r i s i s .

But t h e s e s m a l l o i l - e x p o r t e r s t o g e t h e r w i t h n o n - o i l

Arab coun t r i e s (such as Jordan or t h e Yemens) b e n e f i t i n d i r e c t l y

f rom economic growth i n t h e ma jo r e x p o r t i n g economies t h r o u g h

r e m i t t a n c e s , d i r e c t i n v e s t m e n t , t r a d e , a i d and o t h e r economic

r e l a t i o n s h i p s . The o i l demand c r i s i s is t h e r e f o r e bound t o

a f f e c t them adve r se ly even i f they themselves have no o i l .

28

I n order t o i l l u s t r a t e t h e impact on rates of economic

growth and c a p i t a l accumulat ion of t he f a l l i n o i l revenues w e

s h a l l draw on the r e s u l t s of t he very important OAFEClENI study

of economic i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e and i n t e r - A r a b c o - o p e r a t i o n .

Although the assumptions of t he OAPEC/ENI models as regards t h e

f u t u r e demand f o r and t h e p r i c e of o i l are n o t i d e n t i c a l t o ou r s ,

t h e y a r e n o t s u f f i c i e n t l y d i f f e r e n t t o j u s t i f y a r e - r u n of t h e

exerc ise . The r e s u l t s s e r v e w e l l t he purpose of i l l u s t r a t i n g the

magnitude of the l i k e l y economic impact of t h e reduct ion i n o i l

revenues.

We have taken as r e l e v a n t i n d i c a t o r s of growth the r a t e

of i n c r e a s e of n o n - o i l GDP ( s i n c e o i l i s t h e exogenous f a c t o r )

and t h e r a t e of c a p i t a l accumulation.

The fo l lowing m a y be i n f e r r e d from Tab le 3. F i r s t , t h e

impact on growth r a t e s of t h e " o i l demand c r i s i s " a l t h o u g h

v a r y i n g i n e x t e n t f r o m c o u n t r y t o c o u n t r y , t e n d s t o b e

s i g n i f i c a n t . S e c o n d l y , t h e impact i s much more s e v e r e f o r t h e

low absorbers (Kuwait, UAE, Libya and Saudi Arabia) than f o r t h e

high absorbers such as I r a q or Algeria . Th i rd ly , a s expected t h e

impact is not very g r e a t on coun t r i e s whose dependence on o i l is

e i t h e r s m a l l o r i n d i r e c t , such as Egypt and Syria .

The t e n t a t i v e conclus ion i s t h a t economic growth will

be r e t a r d e d i n t h e main Arab o i l - e x p o r t i n g c o u n t r i e s . Once

a g a i n , t h e r a t e s t h a t m a y o b t a i n i n 1985-1995 s h o u l d not b e

compared w i t h t h e v e r y h i g h pe r fo rmance of t h e 1970s . We h a v e

argued c o n s i s t e n t l y t h a t t he 1970s was an unusual per iod and t h a t

t he growth explos ion of t h a t decade i n v o l v e d many problems and

29

unfavourable s i d e e f f e c t s . Growth of non-oil GDP of the o rde r of

10-20 p e r c e n t p.a. may b e p a r t l y i l l u s o r y o r w a s t e f u l . The

r e fe rence should r a t h e r be s u s t a i n a b l e rates of 6 t o 8 per cent

which may b e c o n s i s t e n t w i t h e f f i c i e n t , non-inf l a t i o n a r y and

smooth developments. The worry is t h a t t he models suggest t h a t

t h e s e r e a s o n s b l e r e f e r e n c e r a t e s w i l l n o t b e a c h i e v e d d u r i n g

1985-1995.

The "oil demand c r i s i s " h a s a l s o b r o a d e r economic and

p o l i t i c a l i m p l i c a t i o n s . A d e e p and l o n g c r i s i s may u p s e t t h e

s o l i d a r i t y of OPEC and weaken i t s g r i p on t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n of

world o i l p r ices . Should t h a t happen, t h e revenue l o s s e s could

b e h i g h e r t h a n p r e d i c t e d i n this p a p e r and t h e e c o n o m i c

consequences could be bleaker .

The o i l demand c r i s i s may a l s o weaken the Arab world on

t h e i n t e r n a t i o n a l p o l i t i c a l scene. O i l i s no t only a source of

revenues but an important f a c t o r of i n t e r n a t i o n a l p o l i t i c a l 1 i f e.

The weakening of OPEC may diminish the barga in ing power of Arab

c o u n t r i e s i n p o l i t i c a l f o r a p a r t i c u l a r l y v is -a -v is t he West.

Table 3: Bates of Growth of Main Economic I n d i c a t o r s 1975-1995 per cent

1975-80 1983-90 1990-95

1. Kuwait

GDP non-oil Gross c a p i t a l formation

2 . Libya kl

GDP non-oil Gross c a p i t a l formation

3. UAE

GDP non-oil Gross c a p i t a l formation

4. Saudi Arabia

GDP non-oil Gross c a p i t a l formation

5 . Alger ia

GDP non-oil Gross c a p i t a l formation

6. Iraq

GDP non-oil Gross c a p i t a l formation

GDP non-oil Gross c a p i t a l formation

8 . S y r i a

GDP non-oil Gross c a p i t a l formation

11.74 2.83 8.50 2.41 1.42 4.60

17 .OO 1.60 3.19 2.34 0.36 1.04

10.52 3.89 4.72 9.82 4.21 3.50

12.79 3.94 4.69 22.67 4.14 3 .OO

11.12 6.89 9.30 7.98 6.01 7.51

12.61 5.06 3.09 6 .27 4.38 1.13

6 .00 4.56 4.41 16.13 5 025 6.84

7.30 5.35 7.02 6.82 4.07 5 .OO

31

6. COBCwlDIBG REMARKS

O i l is an important source of w e a l t h f o r t he Arab world

and i t s in f luence extends to t h e whole reg ion - o i l - expor t e r s and

n o n - o i l economies a l i k e . The w o r l d p e t r o l e u m m a r k e t h a s gone

through dramatic convuls ions i n the 1970s and e a r l y 1980s. The

c y c l e of ups and downs i s unusual ly long w i t h an upswing phase of

1 5 t o 20 y e a r s and a downswing which may w e l l e x t e n d o v e r 10 o r

1 5 years .

Because of t h e unique dependence of t h e Arab economy on

t h i s f a c t o r t h e impact of s u c h a l o n g and v i o l e n t c y c l e can b e

e x t r e m e l y d i s t u r b i n g . OPEC power which m a n i f e s t e d i t s e l f so

d r a m a t i c a l l y i n t h e 1970s o v e r p r i c e s i s c o n s t r a i n e d i n o t h e r

respec ts . OPEC has not been a b l e to r e g u l a t e t h e c y c l e in order

t o smooth o u t p r o d u c t i o n movements. The d e p l e t i o n r a t e of o i l

has been imposed by o u t s i d e f a c t o r s on t h e OPEC c o u n t r i e s , y e t

t he d e p l e t i o n ra te is a a most c r i t i c a l f a c t o r i n terms of long-

term d e v e l o p m e n t p l a n n i n g . The upswing and t h e o i l p r i c e

e x p l o s i o n e n t a i l e d many i m p o r t a n t b e n e f i t s as w e l l a s a few

troublesome costs. The downswing i n v o l v e s some bene f i t s , which

we have d u l y recognized, but a l s o cons ide rab le costs .

Governments, however, are not t o t a l l y powerless i n t h i s

c u r r e n t a d v e r s e s i t u a t i o n . They c o u l d a t t e m p t t o t a k e b e t t e r

advantage of t he p o t e n t i a l developmental b e n e f i t s of a f a l l i n

revenues and reduce the l o s s e s by adopt ing appropr i a t e f i s c a l and

i n v e s t m e n t p o l i c i e s . They s h o u l d a l s o do t h e i r u tmost t o keep

OPEC toge the r during the d i f f i c u l t c r i s e s which m a y l i e ahead of

us. A f a i l u r e on t h a t s c o r e will compound f u t u r e p rob lems and

losses . I n t h i s c o n t e x t O P E C s h o u l d t a k e a c l o s e look a t i t s

r o l e a s r e s i d u a l s u p p l i e r , renew t h e i r e f f o r t s t o i n v o l v e non-

OPEC e x p o r t e r s i n t h i s r o l e , and des ign a more s o p h i s t i c a t e d o i l

po l i cy than the single-minded defense of the o i l p r i c e l ine . It

i s as important t o a t tempt some management of t h e demand f o r o i l

a s i t i s t o d e f e n d t h e o i l p r i c e l e v e l . O t h e r w i s e OPEC member

c o u n t r i e s would c o n t i n u e t o f a l l v i c t i m t o s e v e r e c y c l i c a l

movements which can d e s t a b i l i z e t h e i r economies and t h e i r

s o c i e t i e s . F i n a l l y , t h e most i m p o r t a n t task i s t o d e f i n e t h e

o b j e c t i v e s and t h e d e s i r e d p a t t e r n of economic deve lopmen t .

I n t h e end o i l w i l l be d e p l e t e d and we s h a l l b e l e f t w i t h t h e

economic d e v e l o p m e n t s a c h i e v e d t h r o u g h t h e e x p e n d i t u r e of

revenues. In the long-run economic development is a l l t h e t

mat ters . The opportuni ty of t ak ing a completely new look a t t h i s

i s s u e is now w i t h us. I t would be a p i t y t o m i s s i t .

33

OXFORD INSTlTUTE FOR ENERGY STUDIES 57 WOODSTOCK ROAD, OXFORD OX2 6FA ENGLAND

TELEPHONE (01865) 311377 FAX (01865) 310527

E-mail: pu [email protected] rg http:Ilwww.oxfordenerg y.org