Upload
myles-nash
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Program
Information about the course content, and lectures
Information about the seminars and exams
Introduction to resilience
- What is resilience about? Summary
Resilience
Definition of resilience What is resilience
about? Research on
resilience Resilience processes Risks and protective
factors
Resilience
Resilience are defined as:
……positive adaptation in the context of sigificant risk or adversity………
”Resiliens er prosesser som gjør at utviklingen når et tilfredsstillende resultat, til tross for at barn har hatt erfaringer med situasjoner som innebærer en relativt stor risiko for å utvikle problemer eller avvik” (Rutter 2000)
Understanding Resilience
Two main components:
1) There must be evidence for positive adaptation, and
2) That there are or have been significant risk to overcome
What is positive adaptation?
“doing okay” Researchers have provided a variety of
criteria’s.- Absence of mental health problems, or- Competence in developmental tasks
Resilience
Resilience is not a constant phenomenon, a person may be resilient at one time, but this does not mean that this person is invulnerable to other risks later in life.
Individuals may be resilient to some environmental hazards but not others; resilience cannot be identified as an individual trait.
Research on resilience
A new focus:
From studying maladaptation to adaptation The rise of a new research focus Longitudinal research design
Longitudinal studies
example: Werner and Smith (1977; 1982; 1992; 2001)
- Kauai study White and colleges (1990)
- Dunedin study Tremblay and colleges (1992, 2000) - Montrealstudy The norwegian MoBa study
Resilience processes
Vulnerability and risk- The compensating modell
Risk
Psychosocial Adaptation
Interventions
( s 42, Resiliens, 2005)
Risk factors
Research have identified factors or criteria’s to predict higher rates of negative outcomes, than others
Risks and stress does not necessary lead to difficulties
Risks should be characterized in relation to relevance, type and seriousness.
Individual differences
- Biological or genetic predispositions- Premature birth- IQ- Gender- Temperament- Personality
Family characteristics
Mental illness in parents Addiction to alcohol or drugs Socio economic status Maternal education Disharmony/divorce Neglect Family size
Protective factors
- Reduce the effect of the risk factors- Sustain and establish a positive self
image.
Protective qualities
Positive network/organization Individual differences Positive relationships Competences Social support ”Sence of coherence”
Community resources
Eks: Quality of schools and day care centres Social networks Good social services and health care
Individual qualities
Eks: Cognitive abilities Positive temperament Self-esteem Competence in example sports Personality Self-regulation skills Positive outlook on life At least one secure attachment Having friends
Family characteristics
Eks: Higher education Less than 4 siblings Good economy Social support from siblings Parental style Maternal warmth
Multiple Risks, Higer Risks?
Multi-risk modell
Multiple risk factors increases the possibility for maladaptation
E-Risk study
Kim-Cohen, Moffitt, Caspi og Taylor, (the E-Risk study)()
Investigated outgoing temperament and maternal warmth as protective factors in children living under low SES.
Low SES was associated with low IQ and higher antisocial behavior.
Resilience against low SES, was found to be partly heritable, Hence protective factors was connected to both environment and protective factors.
Factors
Resilience involves understanding underlying processes or mechanisms
There is a need to understand interaction between individual differences and the environment (nature/nurture)
Thus: Resilience is the study of individual differences
in response to stress or adversity.
Example: Genotype and environment Dunedin study, Caspi, et al 2002. This study examined the association between
antisocial behaviour and maltreatment in childhood.
Results showed- more severe maltreatment, more engangement in antisocial behaviour.
Low activity in the MAOA gene- reported more stronger effect