21
The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

The Creation NarrativePart 3 – The Creation of Man

byDavid C. Bossard19thPsalm.org

Page 2: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

LECTURE PART THREETHE CREATION OF MAN

Creation of Man

The Scientific Evidence for Human Beginnings--- Three lines of evidence:

• Cave Art• Tools and artifacts• Fossil bones and skeletons

--- As we go, look for Human activity.What sets humans apart?

2

Page 3: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

LECTURE PART THREETHE CREATION OF MAN

Creation of Man

A. The Scientific Evidence for Human Beginnings• What Sets Humans Apart?

3

Painted by a Human?Font de Gaume Cave

Male Reindeer Caressing Femaleca. 19,000 BP, Magdelenian Era

Cave discovered in 1901

Chavet Cave artBison 30,340±570 BPHorses 26,980±420 BPLions date ?? BPCave discovered in 1995.

Page 4: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

LECTURE PART THREETHE CREATION OF MAN

Creation of Man

A. The Scientific Evidence for Human Beginnings• Lascaux Astronomy – Hall of Bulls

4

Page 5: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

LECTURE PART THREETHE CREATION OF MAN

Creation of Man

Lascaux Astronomy

5… but what Is this line?Pleiades …Orion's Belt … Taurus/Hyades …

free

-hdw

allp

aper

s.co

m

Page 6: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

LECTURE PART THREETHE CREATION OF MAN

Creation of Man

A. The Scientific Evidence for Human Beginnings• Lascaux "Astronomy"

6

Page 7: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

LECTURE PART THREETHE CREATION OF MAN

Creation of Man

A. The Scientific Evidence for Human Beginnings• Lascaux "Astronomy"

7

Page 8: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

LECTURE PART THREETHE CREATION OF MAN

Creation of Man

8

Page 9: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

Creation of Man

A. The Scientific Evidence for Human Beginnings Fossil tools – stone, bone, wood, etc.

9

Use of tools:In the Genes

or Learned behavior?

Monarch MigrationMust be in the genes!

Neanderthals:Mousterian 300,000–30,000 BP

Aterian: 80,000-40,000 BPTool use?

Genes? Innovative? Rote?

"It has often been said that no animal uses any tools."Charles Darwin, Descent of Man (1874)

Page 10: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

Creation of Man

A. The Scientific Evidence for Human Beginnings Fossil tools – stone, bone, wood, etc.

10

Facts to keep in mind…• Tools are not uniquely human or even hominid• There is an extensive fossil record of tools showing

gradual advances over time- At what point do they indicate human activity?

A simple pointflaked from flint

(Mousterian 300,000-30,000 BP

Wooden spear cut/shaped from log(Schöningen 380,000-400,000 BP, discovered ca. 1995)

scraper spear headAterian Tang Tools

(N. Africa, 80,000-40,000 BP)

Page 11: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

Creation of Man

A. The Scientific Evidence for Human Beginnings Fossil tools – stone, bone, wood, etc.

11

Chatelperronian tools35,000-29,000 BP Gravettian Tools

32,000-22,000 BPAurignacian Tools40,000-26,000 BP

Page 12: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

Creation of Man

A. The Scientific Evidence for Human Beginnings Fossil tools – stone, bone, wood, etc.

Summary:

• Evidence of Sustained Rational Innovation doesnot appear until 40,000 BP with the Cro-Magnons.

• The Stone tools of Neanderthals showed only minor innovation over vast periods of time.

Page 13: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

Creation of Man

A. The Scientific Evidence for Human Beginnings Skeletal Fossil Evidence

Page 14: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

Creation of Man Skeletal Fossil Evidence

14

(A) Pan troglodytes, chimpanzee, modern(B) Australopithecus africanus, STS 5, 2.6 Ma(C) Australopithecus africanus, STS 71, 2.5 Ma(D) Homo habilis, KNM-ER 1813, 1.9 Ma(E) Homo habilis, OH24, 1.8 Ma(F) Homo rudolfensis, KNM-ER 1470, 1.8 Ma(G) Homo erectus, Dmanisi cranium D2700, 1.75 Ma

(H) Homo ergaster (early H. erectus), KNM-ER 3733, 1.75 Ma(I) Homo heidelbergensis, "Rhodesia man," 300,000 - 125,000 BP(J) Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, La Ferrassie 1, 70,000 BP(K) Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, La Chappelle-aux-Saints, 60,000 BP(L) Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, Le Moustier, 45,000 BP(M) Homo sapiens sapiens, Cro-Magnon I, 30,000 BP(N) Homo sapiens sapiens, modern

Source: Dr. Douglas Theobald, © 2000 Smithsonian Institution Carl Drews, Transitional Fossils of Hominid Skulls.See also Wikipedia's List of Human Evolution Fossils.

Page 15: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

Creation of Man

Skulls: Neanderthal, Cro-Magnon, and Modern Human

15

Chimp & Human Pharynx

Neanderthal & Human Pharynx

Page 16: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

Creation of Man

16

Skeletons: Neanderthal, Cro-Magnon, and Modern Human

Why Neanderthals are not considered Human:(Ongoing – lots of info in the past 5 years)

DNA evidence:• Genetic DNA

96-99% match (depending on whom you ask!)• Mitochondrial DNA (comes from mother only)

-- Neanderthal mtDNA "half-way between human and chimp"

Warning: • These Percentages are just glosses –really need the details!• Human genes "from Neanderthals" is another gloss! Again, need the details!

CONCLUDE: Humans likely did not mate with Neanderthals. (some say they didn't even co-exist! I think they may have.)

Page 17: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

Creation of Man

17

CONCLUSIONS:• Summary of the Creation Narrative

- The Silent Voice- The Four Geneses

• Big Bang• Creation of First Life (Bacteria)• Creation of Eukaryotes• Creation of Man

- The Four Paradoxes• Combinatoric Paradox• Eigen Paradox• Levinthau Paradox• Regulatory Paradox

Page 18: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

Creation of Man

18

CONCLUSIONS:• Creation of Man

All lines of evidence indicate that modern humans first appeared 40,000 – 30,000 BP.

Cave Art: Definite human activity by 32,000 BPTools: Notable lack of innovation prior to thisBones: Neanderthals not human ancestors.

Page 19: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

The Genesis Creation AccountPart 3 – The Creation of Man

Preliminary Comment(not a part of the talk)

Page 20: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

Supplement to Slide 10: Hominid Skull locations

Page 21: The Creation Narrative Part 3 – The Creation of Man by David C. Bossard 19thPsalm.org

Creation of Man -- SUPPLEMENTARY SLIDE

21

A. The Scientific Evidence for Human Beginnings Remark on Evolutionary Rates of Change

Remarks on Generation Counts.-- Chimps to Humans (100,000-200,000 generations)

-- 35 million single nucleotide changes-- 5 million insertion/deletions-- Chromosomal rearrangements (24 to 23)

-- Neanderthal to Cro-Magnon (8,000 generations)?-- Cro-Magnon to Human (2,000 generations)?-- Ur to Modern Human (200-300 generations)?

Comparison on Generation Counts-- E-Coli (20 minutes): 100,000 generations in 4 years-- Cyanobacteria (1 day): 100,000 generations in 275 yrs.

• Since first life (3.9 Ba): 1-2 trillion generations

"Realize of course that the 10,000-100,000 time window for the emergence of homo sapiens is a mere blink of time in which profound changes occurred. How could this possibily have been accounted for by natural, undirected change?"

Ian Tattersall, Masters of the Planet, (2012)