Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Central Texas ACE Collaboration (CTAC)
21st Century Community Learning Centers Cycle 7
Grantee Final Report 2015
Raymond Canizales External Evaluator
July 31, 2015
This report meets the reporting requirements associated with the Afterschool Centers on Education (ACE) funded by 21st Century Community Learning Centers grants. The report incorporates all the mandated report elements
and outline provided in the ACE Evaluator Report Guidelines 2014-15 and modified in June 2015.
1
The Central Texas ACE Collaboration (CTAC)
21st CCLC Cycle 7 – 2015 Grantee Final Evaluation Report
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................2
II. Introduction and Purpose of Program ........................................................................................8
III. Evaluation Strategy Plan ..........................................................................................................14
IV. Program Support Strategy........................................................................................................18
V. Program Participation ...............................................................................................................26
VI. Program Intermediate Outcomes .............................................................................................28
VII. Program Impacts.....................................................................................................................38
VIII. Stakeholder Perceptions ........................................................................................................39
IX. Assessment of Evaluator Recommendations and Coordinator Commentary ..........................52
X. Next Steps .................................................................................................................................56
XI. Evaluator Information ..............................................................................................................61
Appendix Section – Executive Summaries
Center 1: Bartlett Schools ..............................................................................................................64
Center 2: Rockdale Elementary .....................................................................................................71
Center 3: San Juan Diego Catholic High School ...........................................................................78
Center 4: Katherine Anne Porter Charter School ..........................................................................85
Center 5: Rockdale Intermediate School .......................................................................................92
Center 6: Rockdale Junior High School.........................................................................................99
Center 7: Texas Empowerment Academy Elementary School ....................................................106
Center 8: Texas Empowerment Academy Middle School ...........................................................113
Center 9: Rockdale High School..................................................................................................120
Center 10: Smithville Elementary School ....................................................................................127
2
I. Executive Summary
The Afterschool Center on Education (ACE) is the program administered through the Texas
Education Agency for the federally funded 21st Century Community Learning Center (CCLS)
grants authorized under the Title IV, Part B of the Elementary and Secondary Act (ESEA), as
amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (NCLB; Public Law 107-110). The purpose
of ACE programs is to support the creation of community learning centers to provide academic
enrichment opportunities during non-school hours for children who attend high-poverty and low-
performing schools. The Central Texas ACE Collaboration (CTAC) Program is composed of ten
centers serving three school districts, three charter schools and one private school. This report
examines the outcomes of the Cycle 7 grant awarded to the (CTAC) Program during the 2014-
2015 school year. The (CTAC) program served 2 students of which 2181 were enrolled as ACE
program participants. Of those 12181 ACE program enrollees, 1198 were regular ACE program
participants attending at least 30 days or more of programing activities. One thousand and sixty-
one parents participated in adult and family education programs. The individual centers
identified in the (CTAC) program are as follows:
Center 1: Bartlett Schools
Center 2: Rockdale Elementary
Center 3: San Juan Diego Catholic High School
Center 4: Katherine Anne Porter Charter School
Center 5: Rockdale Intermediate School
Center 6: Rockdale Junior High School
Center 7: Texas Empowerment Academy Elementary School
Center 8: Texas Empowerment Academy Middle School
Center 9: Rockdale High School
Center 10: Smithville Elementary School
3
Listed below is a major summary of findings for the “combined” ten centers.
Finding 1: Achievement in Regular Classroom Academic Performance
English Language Arts: Grade change by regular ACE program students from semester 1
to semester 2:
Center Number Change
Increase or
Decrease
1 0.25 Increase
2 1.28 Increase
3 4.00 Increase
4 2.58 Increase
5 0.70 Increase
6 2.35 Decrease
7 0.16 Increase
8 0.21 Increase
9 2.27 Increase
10 0.61 Decrease
Mathematics: Grade change by regular ACE program students from semester 1 to
semester 2:
Center Number Change
Increase or
Decrease
1 0.30 Increase
2 0.68 Decrease
3 0.30 Decrease
4 0.51 Increase
5 0 No Change
6 0.44 Decrease
7 0.79 Decrease
8 1.74 Increase
9 3.05 Decrease
10 0.56 Decrease
4
Science: Grade change by regular ACE program students from semester 1 to semester 2:
Center Number Change
Increase or
Decrease
1 0.24 Increase
2 2.43 Increase
3 2.20 Increase
4 1.16 Increase
5 1.57 Decrease
6 3.04 Decrease
7 2.67 Increase
8 2.45 Decrease
9 0.48 Decrease
10 1.01 Decrease
Social Studies: Grade change by regular ACE program students from semester 1 to
semester 2:
Center Number Change
Increase or
Decrease
1 1.61 Increase
2 0.89 Increase
3 1.30 Decrease
4 1.15 Decrease
5 1.29 Decrease
6 2.86 Decrease
7 4.07 Decrease
8 2.40 Increase
9 1.64 Decrease
10 0.57 Decrease
5
Finding 2: Achievement in State Assessment Performance (STAAR Test)
English Language Arts: Passing rate of all center students versus regular ACE program
attendees:
Center Number
All
Students
Regular 21st
CCLC
Attendees
1 60.0% 65.0%
2 N/A N/A
3 N/A N/A
4 74.6% 77.8%
5 74.0% 47.0%
6 74.1% 54.9%
7 72.5% 72.5%
8 72.6% 72.6%
9 58.2% 54.5%
10 69.3% 57.4%
Mathematics: Passing rate of all center students versus regular ACE program attendees:
Center Number
All
Students
Regular 21st
CCLC
Attendees
1 N/A N/A
2 N/A N/A
3 N/A N/A
4 45.5% 50.0%
5 N/A N/A
6 100.0% 100.0%
7 N/A N/A
8 100.0% 100.0%
9 71.0% 73.0%
10 N/A N/A
6
Science: Passing rate of all center students versus regular ACE program attendees:
Center Number
All
Students
Regular 21st
CCLC
Attendees
1 38.0% 37.0%
2 N/A N/A
3 N/A N/A
4 62.5% 76.9%
5 56.0% 20.0%
6 59.2% 40.0%
7 66.7% 66.7%
8 87.5% 87.5%
9 79.2% 71.4%
10 67.8% 61.3%
Social Studies: Passing rate of all center students versus regular ACE program attendees:
Center Number
All
Students
Regular 21st
CCLC
Attendees
1 15.0% 17.0%
2 N/A N/A
3 N/A N/A
4 97.8% 97.2%
5 N/A N/A
6 50.8% 35.0%
7 N/A N/A
8 77.3% 77.3%
9 90.5% 100.0%
10 56.8% 0.0%
Finding 3: Achievement in Attendance Improvement
The (CTAC) combined average daily attendance of regular ACE program enrollees
increased by 8.03 days from semester one to semester two.
7
Finding 4: Achievement in Behavior Improvement
The combined results of all (CTAC) centers indicates that stakeholders perceived an
improvement in student behavior. Survey results indicated that 69% of students, 68% of
parents and 52% of staff either agreed or strongly agreed that ACE program students had
improved in their behavior during the 2014-2015 school year.
Finding 5: Achievement in Promotion Improvement
Improvement in academic performance and in regular school day attendance are two
factors that contribute greatly to student promotion success. Using the combined center
results from the survey administered in spring 70% of students, 73% of parents and 75% of
staff agreed or strongly agreed that the grades of ACE program students had improved
during the 2014-2015 school year. On that same survey 68% of students, 66% of parents
and 52% of staff agreed or strongly agreed that the attendance of ACE program students
had improved during the 2014-2015 school year.
Finding 6: Achievement in Graduation Improvement (Applicable only to High School)
According to the most recent (2013-2014) Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) the
completion rate/retention rate for Rockdale High School was 95.8%, San Juan Diego Catholic
High School was 92% and for Katherine Anne Porter Charter School was 98.5%.
8
II. Introduction and Purpose of Program
A. Description of Centers
The Central Texas ACE Collaboration (CTAC) is a partnership made up of small schools in the
Central Texas area, managed jointly through a partnership of Education Service Center, Region 13
(ESC 13) and the Austin Community College (ACC). This collaboration consists of three
independent school districts, three private schools and one charter school, serving students in
grades from Pre-Kindergarten to grade 12. This collaboration allows a direct pathway to higher
education and career training. Four of the ten schools in CTAC formerly collaborated in the Cycle
4 21st CCLC Project led by Region XIII Education Service Center. The experiences learned from
the Cycle 4 Project have enabled the current collaboration of schools to share lessons learned and
create mentor schools. This partnership has built a strong, effective and sustainable out-of-school
time (OST) program. Members of this collaboration have shared successful strategies for
engaging high-risk youth at state and national 21st CCLC conferences. The addition of ACC brings
expertise on parent engagement, adult basic education, character development and a better linkage
with higher education and post-secondary career training. Region XIII is a recognized leader in
providing training and technical assistance to campuses in Central Texas on improving academic
competencies, strategic tutoring, and positive behavior intervention and college and career
readiness. This partnership has expanded the community partnerships, family engagement and
adult education outreach programs available to the ten participating centers.
The campuses partnering in CTAC are all smaller schools that have limited resources and
infrastructure to oversee and manage the various components of 21st CCLC operations and
accountability. All ten centers have great needs, in terms of at-risk students, academic achievement
gaps and scarcity of community resources for students and their family members. Sharing
strengths and experiences with proven, evidence-based strategies using the PRIME Blueprint
planning process and associated tools have provided the necessary tools to boost student
achievement, increase attendance, improve behavior, and keep students on track for timely
promotion and graduation.
Key components of the CTAC program include integrated OST time academic tutoring, academic
enrichment, technology training, and extracurricular learning for enrolled students and their family
members. CTAC offers high quality learning opportunities to students who have been identified
by their campus administration, teachers or parents as in need of additional assistance, either
academic, behavioral, or both. Each school provides before school learning time, where students
can receive tutoring, complete homework assignments and use the school’s computer and library
resources. Students in the after school program are provided a range of learning opportunities,
including homework assistance, tutoring in core academic areas, technology, fine arts,
health/wellness, college and career exploration opportunities, and physical fitness. Each day,
students participate in a minimum of one academic learning activity and one enrichment activity.
These programs are offered 4-5 days per week during the school year and four 6 hours per day for
four weeks in the summer. There are also occasional special weekend and evening activities
available to students and their parents.
9
Each CTAC campus offers targeted parent and family learning opportunities, including parenting
classes, strategies to support student learning, English as a Second Language classes, technology
training, and Adult Basic Education and college/career preparation activities. ACC has taken the
lead in providing training, technical assistance and expertise in serving the adult and family
members. Finally, many diverse community partners continue to participate in these programs.
They provide volunteer assistance, college and career readiness opportunities, high engagement
classes and resources to support the program at each center. It is the general belief of the
administrative and support team that building parent and community support is necessary to create
an effective and sustainable program.
B. Overall Goals
There are five program objectives or intermediate outcomes identified in each center’s logic
model. Samples of specific expectations and the intended strategies to use are listed below.
1. To improve academic performance
Expectation: To see underperforming students improve in all areas.
Strategy: Provide assessment-based academic assistance and academic enrichment for under-
performing students
Expectation: For all students to master their current grade level work, move on to their next grade and
pass their STAAR exams. Strategy: Subject matter teachers provide homework help to students. Our clubs (enrichment
classes) are an enhancement to the day-to-day lesson plans.
Expectation: To improve in math, science and writing
Strategy: Provide tutorials, involve students in activities where they are utilizing core academic
subjects in everyday lessons, provide quality instruction and assistance.
Strategy: Provide tutorials, involve students in activities where they are utilizing core academic
subjects in everyday lessons, provide quality instruction and assistance. Students will also work on
homework and/or receive support with classroom work.
Expectation: Students will show improvement in reading and math
Strategy: There are opportunities for students to receive morning homework help. Most
enrichment classes have a connection to the content areas of math and reading. Tutorials are
offered in math and reading and tie into instruction during the school day.
Strategy: The program offers a strong tutorial program for those students who are in need of
specific help to address needs in skills and concepts. The enrichment activities also contain a
strong academic component.
Expectation: Students will improve in Math, ELA, Science, and Social Studies subject areas.
Strategy: The offering of a variety of tutorial classes as well as enrichment classes, program
offerings such as science and writing, and the project based learning activities.
10
Expectation: To improve in math, science and writing
Strategy: To Improve Academic Performance, subject specific tutorials, homework help, and
benchmark testing are provided.
2. To improve attendance
Expectation: To improve student daily attendance
Strategy: Encourage students to attend their regular day classes and the after school program by
rewarding attendance and successes and offering enrichment activities that appeal to student
interests. Also, improving mastery of content, building stronger relationships, and making school
fun through tutorials and enrichment activities.
Strategy: Encourage students to attend their regular day classes and the after school program by
rewarding attendance and successes and offering enrichment activities that appeal to student
interests.
Strategy: San Juan Diego has a very strict attendance policy. The office administrators stay on top
of class attendance. The Vice-Principle takes care of addressing absences with each student.
Strategy: Offer unique and engaging after-school opportunities that corroborate regular school
day experiences
Expectation: School attendance will be improved or maintained
Strategy: Students enjoy the different activities offered in the after school program and in order to
participate in the program the students must be in attendance during the school day. Also, the help
given means that students are not intimidated by school.
Strategy: Because after school participation is based on students being present during the regular
school day, students who enjoy the afterschool program will show up on a regular basis to their
school day classes.
Expectation: Students will attend school regularly and seek to increase attendance rates.
Strategy: Encouraging the students daily and providing a good learning environment for the
students.
Expectation: That all school day students attend the program and stay until the program ends at
6:00 pm.
Strategy: By offering clubs (enrichment classes) that the students are interested in then that
increases their excitement and they want to participate.
3. To improve behavior
Expectation: To decrease behavior referrals from the classroom teachers
Strategy: By improving mastery of content, building stronger relationships, and making school
fun through tutorials and enrichment activities we will decrease behavior referrals and increase
positive behavior.
11
Strategy: Encourage student positive behavior by rewarding excellence and successes and
nominating students for “Student of the Month” when showing positive behavior in school and
after school activities.
Expectation: Students will demonstrate good behavior
Strategy: We are working on a reward system for good behavior. I personally also ask different
students each day about what "color" they are on and make it a point to make a big deal about good
colors. I want the students to know that people care about how they act and that it is important to
behave in school. On the flip side, there are also steps taken if a student misbehaves and the
student can be removed from the program.
Strategy: Encourage student positive behavior by rewarding excellence and successes through
awarding Right Choice coupons – also a regular school day program.
Strategy: A positive environment for the students and a variety of enrichment activities that are
attractive and enjoyable for the students. The school also teaches all students Steven Covey's The
Leader in Me leadership skills.
Expectation: To decrease behavior referrals from teachers, faculty, and staff.
Strategy: This being a Catholic School Student behavior that is deemed inappropriate is handled
immediately by Faculty, Staff, who then takes the matter to the Dean of Discipline.
Expectation: To reduce number of student ISS referrals and increase the number of “good news
reports” presented on the campuses.
Strategy: To offer constructive beyond-school hours activities that provide students occasions for
social/emotional development.
Expectation: That the program helps support the regular school day staff with improving student
behavior.
Strategy: Children cannot participate in the after school program if their regular school day
classroom behavior is unacceptable. Students are taught to show respect for each other.
Expectation: Continually reinforce the student behavior expectations from the day time and
address disciplinary matters accordingly.
Strategy: If any disciplinarian problems persist from a student then they are addressed according
to each student. This is to not allow disruption to their other students.
4. To improve promotion rates
Expectation: To improve or maintain promotion rates
Strategy: Provide study sessions, tutorials and enrichment activities that help students perform
better in the regular school day. By improving mastery of content, building stronger relationships,
and making school fun through enrichment activities. Students are also receiving more
personalized instruction through an on-line curriculum.
Strategy: Provide study sessions, tutorials and enrichment activities that help students perform
better in the regular school day.
12
Strategy: All students and parents are aware of the academic expectations for each student.
Parents and students are involved in setting goals for each child. We provide homework help and
tutorials to support students.
Strategy: Offer homework assistance and tutoring that helps students fill gaps in understanding of
school and testing material so that they are promoted.
Expectation: All students will be promoted
Strategy: By targeting students who need the most help and encouraging them to come after
school and before school, these students will receive extra help in the areas they need it in. This
means that students are more likely to be promoted.
Expectation: Students are expected to achieve skills to promote to next grade level.
Strategy: The targeting of students that are at-risk and that are headed toward failure if there is no
intervention. The tutorials will focus on students’ academic needs. Students are identified at
regularly scheduled Educational Concerns Committee (ECC) meetings.
Expectation: All students advance to the next grade level
Strategy: Provide homework help, tutorials and enrichment activities that help students perform
better in the regular school day. If students are acting right and their academic performance is
good, it will follow that they will be successful in school and will likely be promoted to the next
grade level.
Strategy: Students who complete their work, attend school and maintain. Improve their behavior
are having success. Which means they will be promoted to their next grade level.
5. To improve graduation rates
Expectation: To improve graduation rates.
Strategy: Provide the assistance needed in academics and activities that will keep students
involved and engaged in their regular school day. By improving mastery of content, building
stronger relationships, and making school fun through enrichment activities. Students are also
receiving more personalized instruction through an on-line curriculum.
Strategy: Target the 2% of students who are at risk of not graduating and identifying their
academic needs to keep them motivated. Communicating with parents on a regular basis about the
status of their students’ academic needs.
Expectation: To improve graduation rates by providing a meaningful environment that gives hope
to students that otherwise they would not have.
Strategy: Provide the assistance needed in academics and activities that will keep students
involved and engaged in their regular school day.
13
C. Theory of Action
Research indicated that a variety of characteristics were commonly held by an exemplary after
school program. The external evaluator, project director and site coordinators agreed to adopt and
excel in each of the twenty-one characteristics of an effective after school program. Thus, the
overall goal that drives the TCAC program is to achieve a level of excellence as defined by the
following twenty-one characteristics of an effective after school program.
1. Includes objectives and goals that are well understood by all stakeholders.
2. Includes a program that is organized and structured and is appropriate for the child.
3. Includes a teacher / student ratio that is reasonable for the particular activity offered.
4. Includes a staff that is professional, trained, and friendly and maintains a positive
relationship with all of the children.
5. Includes a program that addresses the academic, personal, physical and social skills of
students.
6. Includes challenging activities and provides opportunities for the students to increase their
level of understanding of complex concepts.
7. Includes no wasted or down time.
8. Includes activities that encourage students to grow mentally, emotionally and physically.
9. Includes an awareness and appreciation for student safety.
10. Includes activities with high level of student participation.
11. Includes positive reinforcement that enhances confidence and increases self-esteem.
12. Includes a high level of fun activities for students.
13. Includes activities that help develop the social, physical and mental needs of children.
14. Includes defined procedures for handling attendance and behavioral issues.
15. Includes parental activities that address needs and interests of parents.
16. Includes a balance of academic, enrichment, college and workforce readiness and family
and parental support service activities.
17. Includes a high level of stakeholder satisfaction with the program.
18. Includes collaboration and partnership building with community organizations.
19. Includes plans for sustainability.
20. Includes a supportive and strong leadership team comprised of campus administration, site
coordinator and project director.
21. Includes a high level of communication between stakeholders.
It was the program’s focus on the four activity components listed in the logic model that drove the
activity offerings for parents and students. Those components included activities that addressed
academic support, enrichment, family and parental support and college/workforce readiness.
14
III. Evaluation Strategy Plan
For purposes of evaluation reporting the TCAC Program used two research designs in obtaining
and analyzing pertinent data related to student demographics and student performance
achievement. The descriptive research design was used because it provided the external evaluator
and the program administrators with a comprehensive set of information about the overall
operation of the program as well as an examination of the strengths and weaknesses associated
with the implementation of the program at each center. In order to obtain a more detailed set of
data that accurately represented how well the ACE program operated during the 2014-2015 school
year, it was necessary to obtain data from a larger population of students than those enrolled in the
ACE program. The quasi-experimental research design enabled the external evaluator to make
comparisons between three groups of students, those that were regular 21st CCLC attendees, those
that were non-regular 21st CCLC attendees and those that were non-participants. ACE program
participants with 30+ days of attendance were defined as “regular”’, those with 1-29 days of
attendance as “non-regular”; and those with 0 days attendance as “non-participants”.
General Grantee Information
Summary of Combined Centers
A. Student enrollment and 21st CCLC program attendance:
Total combined campus enrollment 2934
# 21st CCLC students enrolled in 1st semester 1803
% of students enrolled in 1st semester 61.5%
# 21st CCLC students enrolled in 2nd semester 1926
% of students enrolled in 2nd semester 65.6%
Total # of parent participants 1061
B. Program Calendar (Dates on individual center may vary)
Month Day Year
Fall start date 9 3 2014
Fall end date 12 5 2014
Spring start date 1 12 2015
Spring end date 5 15 2015
Summer start date 6 8 2015
Summer end date 7 3 2015
15
C. Program Schedule
D. Staff Information
Teacher Categories # %
Campus certified teachers 153 74%
Non campus certified teachers 10 5%
Non-certified teachers 45 21%
Total number teachers in ACE 208
E. ACE Student Demographics
Ethnicity Information
All Students All 21st CCLC Regular Only
Ethnicity # % # % # %
Am Indian 18 0.6% 13 0.7% 10 0.9%
Asian 19 0.6% 7 0.4% 4 0.4%
African Amer. 596 19.3% 453 25.5% 362 34.3%
Hispanic 1065 34.5% 628 35.3% 341 32.3%
White 1386 44.9% 676 38.0% 339 32.1%
Totals 3084 100.0% 1777 100.0% 1056 100.0%
Number of morning hours per week scheduled 47.25
Number of after school hours per week scheduled 100.50
Combined total of morning and after school hours per week 147.75
Number of days per week program is offered 4.8
16
Gender Information
All Students All 21st CCLC Regular Only
Gender # % # % # %
Males 1586 51.5% 914 51.5% 542 51.4%
Females 1494 48.5% 862 48.5% 513 48.6%
Totals 3080 100.0% 1776 100.0% 1055 100.0%
Grade Level of Students
All Students All 21st CCLC Regular Only
Grade # % # % # %
PreK 117 3.8% 29 1.6% 24 2.3%
K 156 5.1% 90 5.1% 79 7.5%
1 181 5.9% 102 5.7% 83 7.9%
2 207 6.7% 135 7.6% 106 10.0%
3 291 9.4% 175 9.8% 129 12.2%
4 325 10.5% 187 10.5% 141 13.4%
5 280 9.1% 145 8.2% 93 8.8%
6 324 10.5% 194 10.9% 114 10.8%
7 279 9.0% 137 7.7% 64 6.1%
8 324 10.5% 119 6.7% 52 4.9%
9 165 5.4% 132 7.4% 53 5.0%
10 143 4.6% 108 6.1% 43 4.1%
11 137 4.4% 110 6.2% 44 4.2%
12 155 5.0% 114 6.4% 31 2.9%
Totals 3084 100.0% 1777 100.0% 1056 100.0%
17
E. ACE Program Participation
Student Participation Types Combined Campuses
# %
ACE General Program Participant 1936 66 %
ACE Regular Program Participant 1215 41 %
Non-ACE Participant 998 34 % Total Combined Campus Enrollment 2934
F. Activity Types Offered
Activity Types Academic
Activities
Enrichment
Activities
Family
Engagement
College
Readiness
Number of different activities
offered 60 89 35 29
Total number of hours
scheduled for activities 28417 7155 898 612
Proportion of time assigned to
each activity type 70 % 25 % 3 % 2 %
18
IV. Program Support Strategy
This section describes the approach taken and data used to prioritize services by each of the ten
centers. Where possible explanations will be provided on activity development, training,
professional development, campus support, supplies and equipment, observational protocols,
marketing and recruitment.
1. Bartlett Schools
At Bartlett Schools, the students that are in ACE tutorials are identified by regular school day staff
with permission from their parent/guardian. These tutorial services are provided to students who
are struggling with their school work and also who failed the state assessments.
The majority of ACE Program staff members are our regular school day teachers. This ensures that
collaboration is happening and that learning in ACE connects with the classroom learning
experience. In the CTAC Center Plan, Bartlett ISD stated that it wanted an increased linkage with
classroom academics. The majority of ACE students have their regular classroom teacher as their
after school teacher.
The ACE program extends learning after the regular school day with fun hands-on activities during
both the tutorial and enrichment sections. It provides linkage with classroom academics with
technology integrated into the program. The program provides ongoing assistance to help students
experience success in the classroom. The program offers homework help, tutorials for selected 3-
5th graders in reading and math, and tutorials for 6-8th graders in reading, math, and science. For
enrichment activities the program offers art, science, math, reading, college and career readiness,
and robotics. With help from student council members, the program also offers game clubs that
includes chess club, sports club, and movie club.
The local school district provided the facilities and utilities that included the use of the regular
classrooms, the cafeteria, library and the two campus gyms. Campus support services included the
teacher leaders, the campus administration, counselors who identified students in need, and a
nurse. The district information services department provided access to the student system and its
varied report capabilities including reports that would single out ACE students.
2. Rockdale Elementary School
At Rockdale Elementary (RES) there is daily communication between the ACE coordinator,
teachers and administration regarding the needs of the students. In addition, teachers, principals,
and the ACE coordinator meet in RTI and ECC meetings to discuss students who have the greatest
academic need, what those student needs might be, and how best to address them. This allows RES
to offer a relatively seamless cross between the regular school day and the afterschool program.
Having the majority of teachers on campus teaching in tutorials and enrichments also allows for
ACE to be able to provide the help the students need during the regular school day. Teachers and
19
administrators communicate regularly with the ACE staff through emails, shared ACE documents,
grade-level RTI/ECC meetings and have common access to student assessment data when
identifying students who need to attend ACE, thus making it easier to address specific student
needs.
The RES ACE staff is primarily composed of teachers who teach in the regular school day. This
allows a continuous flow between the regular school day and the ACE program and their learning
experiences.
The ACE program is a tremendous asset to the regular school day program in that many of the
current after-school activities would not be an option for our students if not for the ACE grant. In
addition to providing math and reading tutorials to students each day, throughout the week the
program also offers a variety of enrichment activities and homework help every morning. Program
attendance in the tutorial and enrichment classes shows that students enjoy coming and rarely miss
if they are in school. The fact that the program has a large number of teachers from the regular
school day that teach before and after school allows the program to provide more academic support
to this population of students.
The local school district provided the facilities and utilities that included the use of the regular
classrooms, the cafeteria, library, gym, computer lab, and outside playground areas. Campus staff
support includes teachers, administrators, counselors, office staff, and school nurse. Information
about students is received from the office staff and the PEIMS coordinator. Other grants that
benefit the program include the Free and Reduced program which provides the students snacks in
the afternoon and a “grab and go” breakfast in the morning.
Community partners include KRXT (local radio station), Rockdale Reporter (local newspaper),
Milam County Master Naturalist, Hughes Insurance Agency, Austin Community College,
Rockdale Police Department, GFL Americas, Mr. Gattis, Lee's Landing, Hillcrest Kid Safe
Program, and Little River Healthcare.
3. San Juan Diego Catholic High School
San Juan Diego Catholic High School offers a relatively seamless cross between the regular school
day and the afterschool program. Having the majority of teachers on campus teaching in tutorials
and enrichments also allows for ACE to be able to provide the help the students need during the
regular school day. Teachers and administrators communicate regularly with the ACE staff
through emails, shared ACE documents, grade-level meetings and have common access to student
assessment data when identifying students who need to attend ACE, thus making it easier to
address specific student needs.
The ACE staff is primarily composed of teachers who teach in the regular school day. This allows
a continuous flow between the regular school day and the ACE program and their learning
experiences. Tutors who are not part of the regular school day require regular school day teachers
20
to observe their afterschool tutoring session and provide verbal feedback. By communicating with
each other face to face, they are in a constant state of learning from each other and their
experiences.
In addition to providing math and reading tutorials to students throughout the week the program
also offers enrichment activities and homework help every day. Program attendance in the tutorial
and enrichment classes shows that students enjoy coming and rarely miss if they are in school. The
fact that the program has a large number of teachers from the regular school day that teach after
school allows the program to provide more academic support to this population of students.
The local Catholic Church provided the facilities twice a week for cheer practice. The Catholic
school down the street allowed San Juan Diego Catholic High School the use of their stage for the
school talent show. Campus support services included the teachers, the campus administration, and
counselors who identified students in need.
Community partners included Dell Computers, Charles Schwab, Austin Learning Center, and St.
Ignatius Catholic School.
4. Katherine Anne Porter Charter School
Having the majority of teachers on campus teaching in tutorials and enrichments allows for KAPS
ACE to be able to provide the help the students need during the regular school day. Teachers and
administrators communicate regularly with the ACE staff through emails, shared ACE documents,
grade-level meetings and have common access to student assessment data when identifying
students who need to attend ACE, thus making it easier to address specific student needs. A team
comprised of the Superintendent, Principal, Registrar, Special Education Director, school
counselor, site coordinator and the IT Director meet weekly to discuss the needs of the campus
student population and how best to serve their educational requirements. During each meeting all
members are encouraged to bring items for discussion to the team for collaboration.
The ACE staff is primarily composed of teachers who teach in the regular school day. This allows
a continuous flow between the regular school day and the ACE program and their learning
experiences.
The ACE program is a tremendous asset to the regular school day program in that many of the
after-school activities would not be an option for our students if not for the ACE grant. Program
attendance in the tutorial and enrichment classes shows that students enjoy coming and rarely miss
if they are in school.
The local charter school provided the facilities and utilities that included the use of the regular
classrooms, the cafeteria, library, campus gym, music room, Mac Lab, Theater, and the garden.
Campus support services included the teacher leaders, the IT Services, Registrar, Principal and
counselors who identified students in need.
21
Community partners included the Master Naturalist Program, Wimberley Lion's Club, Whole
Foods, Wimberley Outdoor Educators and the Wimberley Library.
5. Rockdale Intermediate School
Teachers providing tutorial assistance in the Rockdale Intermediate School (RIS) ACE program
are the regular school day classroom teachers, therefore, student needs are very well understood.
The ACE coordinator, teachers, principal, and counselor determine needs of students during each
grading period in ECC/RTI meetings. Shared access of data during the ECC/RTI meetings
provides assurance that student needs are being met. CBA, STAAR, and previous STAAR data is
available to all staff members having a shared interest in student needs.
The ACE staff is composed of teachers who teach in the regular school day. This allows a
continuous flow between the regular school day and the ACE program and their learning
experiences.
Students participating in ACE have opportunities not only to strengthen their academics through
subject-specific tutorials, but also to participate in extra-curricular activities they might not
otherwise be exposed to. Tutorials are strongly encouraged throughout the RIS campus and
supported by all staff. The enrichment activities afford students opportunities to develop life-long
interests in areas such as cooking, gardening, technical and arts and crafts. Many of these activities
are community-based service projects, allowing students to see their efforts making a difference in
their community.
The ACE program at RIS is highly recognized by staff, students and parents as a strong program,
providing for the whole development of the child through tutorials and enrichment activities that
allow the students to be actively involved in community service projects. Parent requests are often
for their child to be involved in service project activities.
A variety of resources were available that contributed to the program’s success. Those resources
were either provided by the local school district or were provided by community partners. The
local school district provided the facilities and utilities that included the use of the regular
classrooms, the cafeteria, library and the two campus gyms. Campus support services included the
teacher leaders, the campus administration, counselors who identified students in need, and the
school resource officer who assisted with security. The district information services department
provided access to the student system and its varied report capabilities including reports that would
single out ACE students.
Community partners included the local media in way of radio station KRXT and weekly
newspaper, Rockdale Reporter, as well as support of local chamber of commerce in promoting the
program.
22
6. Rockdale Junior High School
The shared understanding and direction of identified students at Rockdale Junior High (RJH) is
relatively seamless between regular day and the after school program. RJH grade-level teachers
and the principal meet during each grading period in ECC meetings to identify students with
academic needs. The ACE coordinator is also in attendance at each of the grade-level meetings.
Student academic needs for both regular day and ACE are also identified by classroom teachers
based on prior STAAR data and current CBA data. Teachers and administrators communicate
regularly with the ACE staff through emails, shared ACE attendance rosters, the grade-level
Educational Concerns Committees (ECC), and have shared access to student assessment data when
identifying students who need to attend ACE.
The ACE program is a tremendous asset to the regular school day program in that many of the
after-school activities would not be an option for our students if not for the ACE grant. In addition
to providing tutorial sessions, the program also offers academic enrichment activities and sessions
of open access to the Library. Also offered are enrichment activities and focused homework help
sessions. Within each week, students have different sessions available before and after school to
support their academic development and personal growth.
The local school district provided the facilities and utilities that included the use of the regular
classrooms, the cafeteria, library, computer labs, cafeteria, school tennis courts, and the campus
gym. Snacks are provided via the free and reduced lunch program. Campus support services
include Science & Math campus coordinator, the campus administrators, office secretaries, and
Food Services campus manager. The district information services department provided access to
the student system and its varied report capabilities and PIEMS clerk assistance when generating
reports.
Community partners included the local Lion’s Club officer co-leading our Leo Club, the local
newspaper (The Rockdale Reporter) and the local radio station (KRXT) providing media coverage,
and the local Chamber of Commerce
7. Texas Empowerment Academy Elementary
The Texas Empowerment Academy Elementary was able to implement the ACE program as
intended because ACE Program personnel attend the regular school day training and also attend
Texas ACE workshops offered. The site coordinator also provides annual training for the ACE
Program personnel and regular school day personnel focused on knowledge gained from ACE
Workshops. There is also daily communication between the ACE coordinator, teachers and
administration regarding the needs of the students. In addition, teachers, principals, and the ACE
coordinator meet to discuss students who have the greatest academic need, what those needs might
be, and how best to address them. This allows Texas Empowerment Academy Elementary to offer
a relatively seamless cross between the regular school day and the afterschool program. Having the
majority of teachers on campus teaching in tutorials and enrichments also allows for ACE to be
23
able to provide the help the students need during the regular school day. Teachers and
administrators communicate regularly with the ACE staff through emails, shared ACE documents,
grade-level meetings and have common access to student assessment data when identifying
students who need to attend ACE, thus making it easier to address specific student needs.
The ACE Math and Reading enrichment classes support the regular school day program by
implementing what the students are learning in our enrichment activities, thus increasing academic
support. The Martial Arts program also gives students opportunities that their parents would not
have been able to afford. In addition to providing math and reading enrichment, tutorials are also
provided to students each day and 45 minutes of homework help every morning. Program
attendance in the tutorial and enrichment classes shows that students enjoy coming and rarely miss
if they are in school. The fact that the program has a large number of teachers from the regular
school day that teach before and after school allows the program to provide more academic support
to this population of students.
The local school provided the facilities and utilities that included the use of regular classrooms, the
cafeteria, playground and gym. The office manager helps with the completion and submission of
time cards, HR, parent emails, and requisitions. Campus support services included the campus
administration and school security. The district registrar provided access to the student system and
its varied report capabilities including reports that would single out ACE students. Other grants
include free and reduced programs for snacks and other Title I services.
Community partners included the local HEB store, Knights of Peter Claver, Hope Lutheran
Church, Ebenezer Baptist Church, Austin Community College, Neighborhood Karate Club, and
local Zumba Program.
8. Texas Empowerment Academy Middle School
In order to best meet the needs of students, the Texas Empowerment Academy Middle School
ACE tutorial offerings in math, science and reading are based on the student’s academic
performance grades and needs identified for students based on the STAAR test results. The Texas
Empowerment Academy MS improvement plan specifies that the ACE program goal is to tailor its
offerings in these areas to ensure continued student improvement on the academics and successful
passing of the STAAR exam.
With the ACE program staff being the same as the regular school day staff, there is an awareness
of what is important and what is needed to meet the students’ needs. At the same time building
relationships with parents and students that make program efforts in ACE more meaningful and
more productive are evidenced in improvement of their grades and test scores.
When developing lesson plans for the after school program, every effort is made to continue the
reinforcement of the regular school day. The ACE staff tailor their afterschool lesson plans for
tutorials day.
24
The school provided the facilities and utilities used in the program and included the use of
classrooms, the cafeteria, dance studio, as well as the agricultural area. Campus support services
included the district budget manager who assisted with time card and requisition processing.
A variety of community partners provided invaluable resources to the program.
9. Rockdale High School
The ACE Coordinator and the regular day staff talk on a regular basis about the needs of the
students. The ACE Coordinator is included in the RTI meetings and has input into what is set up
for after school extended learning. The ACE Coordinator compiled a list of students who needed
extra reading help, extra math help and science help. Because of shared access to data involving
the students, it was easier to address specific student needs.
The ACE staff is primarily composed of teachers who teach in the regular school day. This allows
a continuous flow between the regular school day and the ACE program and their learning
experiences.
The ACE program provides a wealth of encouragement and opportunities for our students that
would otherwise not be available. It is a huge asset to the regular school day program in that many
of the after-school activities would not be an option for our students if not for the ACE grant. In
addition to providing math and reading tutorials to students each day, the program also offered
enrichment activities and homework help every morning. Program attendance in the tutorial and
enrichment classes shows that students enjoy coming and rarely miss if they are in school. Having
a large number of regular school day teachers working in the afterschool program allows the
program to provide the education support that the students need.
The local school district is very supportive of the afterschool program and makes all facilities
available, which includes regular classrooms, cafeteria, gyms, library, auditorium, and weight
room. Campus support services included the teachers, the campus administration, counselors who
identified students in need, custodians, cafeteria staff, and the transportation system. The PEIMS
coordinator provided all necessary information required for reporting.
Community partners included the Senior Citizens Center, Rockdale Reporter, Rotary Club, Lions
Club, City of Rockdale, Chamber of Commerce, Walmart, GFL, Mr. Gattis Pizza, and McDonalds.
10. Smithville Schools
There is ongoing communication between the ACE coordinator, teachers and administration
regarding the needs of the students. In addition, teachers, parents, and the ACE coordinator meet to
discuss how to serve students having the greatest need. Consequently, ACE academic programs
stay closely aligned to the regular school day activities. Having teachers from every grade or
25
subject on campus teaching in tutorials and enrichments also allows for ACE to be able to provide
the help the students need during the regular school day.
The Smithville ISD (SISD) ACE staff is primarily composed of teachers who teach in the regular
school day. Thus, students are exposed to a variety of teaching styles and perspectives that all align
with district standards and improvement goals.
The SISD ACE program offers a number of programs that are not available as part of the regular
school day curriculum. ACE is there to support students before and after school. Nearly a quarter
of all students across the elementary and middle school campuses are regular attendees at ACE.
Students are motivated to come for some of the unique offerings made possible at their request.
The local school district has made available resources spanning two campuses. Two main
campuses, two gymnasiums, cafeteria facilities and personnel are just a few basics available for
housing students. Deliberate inclusion of the ACE Site Coordinator on several committees,
academic teams, and easy access to academic records have been available since the start and
continue to be available for daily use.
A variety of community partners have provided resources greatly appreciated by the ACE
program. These groups have made monetary or in-kind donations in the forms of educational
instructors, or supplies.
26
V. Program Participation
A. The Right Students Served
The characteristics of program participants and their level of participation in program activities is
shown in each of the center reports found in the appendix section of this report. Data in those
center reports shows that the students at each center that were in most need of services have
enjoyed a high level of participation in all activities offered. Site coordinators utilized not only the
data available in the TEASE system, but also the student demographic and performance data that
was more readily available locally.
The evaluator recognizes that significant progress has been made toward addressing and achieving
the stated program goals in the Logic Model. An examination of the pairing of activities to
students indicates that every effort has been made to provide the most appropriate services to the
targeted population of students. Even the stakeholders acknowledged this observation with their
responses on the spring 2015 stakeholder survey.
B. The Right Activities
The selection of activities offered during the 2014-2015 school year was a response to identified
special needs and interests of students. The listing and description of activities offered is shown in
both the individual center’s Logic Model and Grantee Logic Model. The activities offered are
identified below:
1. Academic Support Activities
Tutorials: Each center offers a variety of aligned core subject tutorials to assist students to
master and achieve readiness on relevant grade-level TEKS
Homework Help: Teachers at each center offer homework assistance to students on a daily
basis.
2. Enrichment Activities
Arts: Students explore artistic expression in a variety of media including music, dance,
drama, crafts and digital design.
Service Learning: Students design, implement and evaluate projects about giving back to
the community through volunteer projects.
Cooking: Student learn to plan and prepare meals using math, science and English
Language Arts.
Computer Lab and Gaming: Through project-based learning students are reinforcing
reading and writing TEKS and building computer skills.
27
Sports: Through physical education students are learning life skills.
Driver’s Education: Students are prepared to meet legal requirements to become a licensed
driver.
3. College and Career Readiness Activities
CCR Classes: Each center offers no less than one class per week that focuses on career
skills and allows for exploration of post-secondary learning opportunities.
4. Family Involvement Activities
Parent University: Parents come together to learn about a variety of topics selected by the
parents.
Family Fitness: Fitness activities including walking, Zumba, strength training and group
sports with children to improve health and wellness.
Parent ELL: Parents who are English Language Learners attend class to improve
vocabulary and fluency.
28
VI. Program Intermediate Outcomes
A. Expectations
The Region XIII Education Service Center ACE Program is driven by the five intermediate
outcomes listed in each center’s logic model found at the end of each centers report. Those
intermediate outcomes have helped to focus the structure and the philosophy surrounding the after
school program as it is being implemented in each of the centers.
The five intermediate outcomes and their related expectations for individual centers are identified
below.
1. To improve academic performance:
By having the expectation that all students will show improvement in reading, math,
science and social studies (Centers 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9)
By having the expectation that all students will show improved performance on benchmark
tests (Centers 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 and 9)
By having the expectation that the ACE program will provide TEKS Targeted Clinics to
improve student academic performance (Centers 8 and 10)
By having the expectation that the ACE program will provide a program that includes
TEKS expectations to improve student academic performance (Center 7)
By having the expectation that all students attending tutorials will show significant
improvement in their academic grades (Centers 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9)
By having the expectation that the after school program will offer assessment based tutorial
programs (Centers 2, 3, 7 and 8)
By having the expectation that all students will be promoted to their next grade level
(Centers 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9)
By having the expectation that all students will pass their STAAR exams (Centers 1, 5, 6,
7, 8 and 9)
By having the expectation that all students will appreciate learning (Centers 2, 5, 6, 7, 8
and 10)
29
2. To improve attendance:
By having the expectation that school attendance will be maintained or improved (Centers
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9)
By having the expectation that students will attend school on a more regular and consistent
basis (Centers 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8)
By having the expectation that staff members will work together to help improve student
attendance (Centers 2, 3, 7, 8 and 10)
By having the expectation that an appealing ACE program will cause students to come to
school (Centers 2, 7, 8 and 9)
By having the expectation that students in the after school program will stay until the end at
5:30 pm or 6:00 pm (Centers 2, 7, and 8)
By having the expectation that program offerings will make students want to attend the
program (Centers 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9)
By having the expectation that students will be excited about the after school program and
will want to be in school in order to attend the after school offerings (Centers 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8
and 9)
By having the expectation that school attendance will improve by 2% (Centers 1, 7, 8 and
9)
3. To improve behavior:
By having the expectation that proper student behavior will be demonstrated by all students
(Centers 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10)
By having the expectation that students will demonstrate respectful behavior (Centers 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10)
By having the expectation that the ACE program will utilize the parents to help improve
student behavior (Center 7)
By having an expectation that the ACE program will help support the regular school day
staff with student behavior (Centers 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9)
By having the expectation that one-on-one contact with children will show them the correct
behavioral direction (Centers 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 and 9)
By having the expectation that students will have acceptable behavior during the school
day so that they can participate in the after school program (Centers 2, 3, 5, 7 and 8)
30
By having the expectation that discipline referrals will decrease by 5% (Centers 1, 3, 6, 7,
8 and 9)
By having the expectation that the establishment of an incentive system will motivate
students to behave (Centers 2, 7, 8 and 9)
By having the expectation that the Human Development Day program will improve student
behavior (Center 8)
4. To improve promotion rates:
By having the expectation that all students will be expected to achieve skills necessary to
be promoted to next grade level (Centers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9)
By having the expectation that the after school program will establish positive relationships
between students and staff so as to facilitate student promotion (Centers 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8)
By having the expectation that the program provide tutorials to assist students with
academic needs (Centers 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10)
By having the expectation that students with the greatest risk of being retained are
identified and monitored (Centers 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10)
By having the expectation that the program will be an encouragement to students via
regular monitoring of their grades and their tutoring needs. (Centers 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 and 9)
By having the expectation that ACE and parent/teacher conferences will help with student
promotion (Center 6)
By having the expectation that 4H and parent/teacher conferences will help with student
promotion (Center 8)
5. To improve graduation rates:
By having the expectation that all students will graduate (Centers 3, 5, 6 and 9)
By having the expectation that the program will establish good relationships between
students and staff members and thus help with student graduating (Centers 1, 3 and 6)
By having an expectation that students attend tutorials, attend school and behave
appropriately so that they can graduate (Centers 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9)
31
By having the expectation that the after school program helps to monitor where students
are in their various courses and when necessary encourage them to attend the tutorials.
(Centers 3, 6 and 9)
By having the expectation that the after school program will provide students with a fun
and welcoming learning environment that gives students the tools and assistance needed to
perform to their highest ability during their regular school day and encourages students to
continue their education. (Center 2)
32
B. Analysis of Achievement
The charts shown below provide a visual representation of how well students in the ACE program
did in achieving each of the desired intermediate outcomes. Each chart contains a comparison
analysis from three groups of students from the combined ten centers. The comparison groups of
students are a) all students enrolled on the CTAC center campuses, b) all students on CTAC center
campuses who enrolled in the ACE program and c) all those students from the CTAC center
campuses who were not only enrolled in the after school program, but who met the criteria for
being identified as regular participants.
1. Achievement in Regular Classroom Academic Performance
English Language Arts
Comparison Average Semester Grade Change
1st
Sem 2nd Sem Change
All Students Enrolled on Campus 83.38 83.75 0.37
All 21st CCLC enrolled students 81.48 81.75 0.27
All 21st CCLC regular students 81.35 81.71 0.36
Mathematics
Comparison Average Semester Grade Change
1st
Sem 2nd Sem Change
All Students Enrolled on Campus 83.52 83.48 -0.04
All 21st CCLC enrolled students 82.13 81.61 -0.53
All 21st CCLC regular students 81.91 81.84 -0.07
Science
Comparison Average Semester Grade Change
1st
Sem 2nd Sem Change
All Students Enrolled on Campus 85.44 84.78 -0.66
All 21st CCLC enrolled students 83.75 83.30 -0.45
All 21st CCLC regular students 83.73 83.69 -0.04
33
2. Achievement in State Assessment Performance
Mathematics
Percent Passing STAAR Test
%
All Students Enrolled on Campus 77.8%
All 21st CCLC enrolled students 70.6%
All 21st CCLC regular students 76.5%
Science
Percent Passing STAAR Test
%
All Students Enrolled on Campus 64.6%
All 21st CCLC enrolled students 55.5%
All 21st CCLC regular students 56.3%
Social Studies
Comparison Average Semester Grade Change
1st
Sem 2nd Sem Change
All Students Enrolled on Campus 86.79 85.95 -0.84
All 21st CCLC enrolled students 85.53 84.47 -1.07
All 21st CCLC regular students 85.88 84.59 -1.28
English Language Arts
Percent Passing STAAR Test
%
All Students Enrolled on Campus 70.2%
All 21st CCLC enrolled students 62.4%
All 21st CCLC regular students 61.2%
34
3. Achievement in Attendance Improvement
Note: One needs to be careful in interpreting the average semester attendance of the groups of
students. There are factors that can impact the average for any group. For example if a student
enters in the middle of the semester or leaves in the middle of the semester, his/her days of
attendance will be different than those students who entered the school year on the first day of
school and remained enrolled until the end of the spring semester.
Classroom Attendance
Comparison of Average Semester Attendance Change
1st
Sem 2nd Sem Change
All Students Enrolled on Campus 78.45 91.86 13.41
All 21st CCLC enrolled students 80.31 90.18 9.88
All 21st CCLC regular students 81.73 89.76 8.03
4. Achievement in Absence Improvement
Note: One needs to be careful in interpreting the average semester absence of the groups of
students. There are factors that can impact the average for any group. The weather in the winter
months for example can impact student absences due to illnesses and harsh weather conditions.
Classroom Absences
Comparison of Average Semester Absences Change
1st
Sem 2nd Sem Change
All Students Enrolled on Campus 2.52 3.56 1.04
All 21st CCLC enrolled students 2.78 3.92 1.14
All 21st CCLC regular students 2.54 3.27 0.73
Social Studies
Percent Passing STAAR Test
%
All Students Enrolled on Campus 66.3%
All 21st CCLC enrolled students 67.8%
All 21st CCLC regular students 73.1%
35
5. Achievement in Behavior Improvement
Improvement In Student Behavior In School
Level of Agreement from Stakeholders
Student Parent Staff
Strongly Agree 45% 41% 20%
Agree 24% 27% 32%
Neutral 21% 30% 36%
Disagree 5% 0% 10%
Strongly Disagree 5% 1% 2%
Student Discipline
Comparison of Average Disciplinary Incidents
1st
Sem 2nd Sem Change
All Students Enrolled on Campus 0.53 0.84 0.31
All 21st CCLC enrolled students 0.57 0.94 0.36
All 21st CCLC regular students 0.43 0.56 0.13
36
6. Achievement in Promotion Improvement
Note: Because the promotion rate for all groups of students is extremely high and only
provides a minimal difference for comparison purposes, it was deemed appropriate to illustrate
the perception of stakeholders with regard to the improvement of academic performance by
students and their improved attendance in school as a result of their participation in the after
school program.
7. Achievement in Graduation Improvement (Applicable only to High School)
According to the most recent (2013-2014) Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) the
completion rate/retention rate for Rockdale High School was 95.8%, San Juan Diego Catholic
High School was 92% and for Katherine Anne Porter Charter School was 98.5%.
Improvement In Student Grades In School
Level of Agreement from Stakeholders
Student Parent Staff
Strongly Agree 46% 39% 28%
Agree 24% 34% 47%
Neutral 21% 22% 22%
Disagree 5% 3% 4%
Strongly Disagree 5% 1% 0%
Improvement In Student Attendance In School
Level of Agreement from Stakeholders
Student Parent Staff
Strongly Agree 48% 38% 23%
Agree 20% 28% 29%
Neutral 21% 31% 45%
Disagree 5% 2% 3%
Strongly Disagree 7% 0% 0%
37
C. General Summary
1. Are there a greater number of students experiencing improvement in each of the five
intermediate outcomes?
a. Improvement in academic performance: Yes
b. Improvement in attendance: Yes
c. Improvement in behavior: Yes
d. Improvement in promotion rates: Yes
e. Improvement in graduation rates: Yes
2. Are there a greater percent of students experiencing improvement in each of the five
intermediate outcomes?
a. Improvement in academic performance: Yes
b. Improvement in attendance: Yes
c. Improvement in behavior: Yes
d. Improvement in promotion rates: Yes
e. Improvement in graduation rates: Yes
3. Are there a greater amounts of improvements by students?
a. Improvement in academic performance: Yes
b. Improvement in attendance: Yes
c. Improvement in behavior: Yes
d. Improvement in promotion rates: Yes
e. Improvement in graduation rates: Yes
38
VII. Program Impacts
The external evaluator and the ACE program staff agreed that it was important to use two research
designs in obtaining and analyzing pertinent data related to student demographics and student
performance achievement. That decision necessitated the requirement for access to on-line student
data that was housed in the various Information Services Departments serving the individual
centers. Their assistance in obtaining the correct and timely information was greatly appreciated.
The descriptive research design was used because it better enables one to provide comprehensive
information about the overall operation of the program as well as an examination of the strengths
and weaknesses associated with the implementation of the program on the local center site. In
order to provide a more comprehensive center report that more accurately represented how well
the ACE program operated during this school year, it was necessary to obtain data from a larger
population of students than those enrolled in the ACE program.
The quasi-experimental research design provided a comparison between three groups of students
on this center, those that were regular 21st CCLC attendees, those that were non-regular 21st CCLC
attendees and those that were non-participants. Charts were provided in Section 6 of this report
that gave a visual representation of how well students in the ACE program did in achieving each of
the desired intermediate outcomes. Each chart contained a comparison analysis from three groups
of students on the TCAC combined campuses. Since only one year of data was readily available,
the evaluator and ACE program staff decided to use a first and second semester comparison of the
three groups of students.
Please refer to Section 6 of this report under the heading “Analysis of Achievement.” That portion
of the report will provide student performance comparison data for grades, school attendance,
school discipline referrals, course completion and achievement test scores.
39
VIII. Stakeholder Perceptions Fall
In spring 2014 BCC ACE centers administered a common survey to students, parents and staff
members. Survey completion participants included 770 students, 246 parents and 129 staff
members. The primary reason for surveying the stakeholders was to obtain their opinion regarding
the effectiveness of the 21st Century CLC program, particularly as an outcome related to the
perceived behaviors and attitudes of student participants. The intent is for this survey to be
administered annually for the remainder of the grant period. Future administrations will provide
important information regarding possible trends in stakeholder opinions. As the program evolves
and experiences demographic and/or programmatic changes, the data obtained will prove helpful
in developing decisions that will be more responsive to the needs of the individual centers and the
program as a whole. Additionally, the surveys will provide program administrators with a
systematic and uniform method of receiving input and serve an integral role in the comprehensive
plan for meeting the individual needs of the center community.
Description of the Survey
The surveys were comprised of Likert-type items, and the range of values for each item was based
on a 5 point scale with the highest value assigned to the response "Strongly Agree" or "Highly
Satisfied." A summary of the response categories and the point value of each is presented in Tables
1 and 2 below:
Table 1 Table 2
Response Category Point Value Response Category Point Value Very Satisfied 5 Strongly Agree 5
Satisfied 4 Agree 4
Neutral 3 Neutral 3
Dissatisfied 2 Disagree 2
Very Dissatisfied 1 Strongly Disagree 1
Domains
Survey statement are clustered into domains according to the issue each specific statement
addresses. For each of the domains, results are reported on a subscale average score, which is an
average of the combined individual item averages and represents the average score for the
particular domain. The number and description of domains is identical for all surveys. The four
domains are identified as follows:
A. Program Activities
B. Program Environment
C. Student Attitudes
D. Student Behaviors
40
Analysis of Survey Results
A. Items on the Program Activities subscale elicited opinions regarding:
The help provided with homework
The variety of enrichment activities
The variety of academic activities
The positive experiences in the program
The opportunity to learn new material
B. Items on the Program Environment subscale elicited opinions regarding:
The class sizes
The special help given by staff
The attention and care given by staff
The opportunity to meet adults
The opportunity to make new friends
The safe environment for students
C. Items on the Student Attitudes subscale elicited opinions regarding:
Student's attitude toward being successful in the after school program
Student's attitude toward attending the after school program
Student's attitude toward being a part of the after school program
Student's attitude toward an enjoyment for learning
Student's attitude toward the regular school day program
Student's attitude toward participating in the after school program in the future
D. Items on the Student Behaviors subscale elicited opinions regarding:
Improved student disciplinary behavior
Improved student academic performance
Improved student attendance in school
The combined responses of all stakeholders from all ten centers is shown in the following pages. It
provides an accurate depiction of how each stakeholder in general perceived the effectiveness of
the CTAC ACE program as it related to each of the domains listed above. An analysis of the data
presented in the following tables indicates that stakeholders hold the CTAC ACE program in high
regard and feel that it is meeting its intended purposes.
1.2
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
1. The help provided with homework.
Domain 1 - Program Activities
2. The variety of enrichment activities
Summary of Responses for Combined Cycle 7 Campuses
Domain 1 - Program Activities
50%
28%
17%
3% 3%
51%
35%
10%3%
0%
50%44%
5%1% 0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 1 - Statement 1
Student Parent Staff
51%
24%19%
2% 3%
55%
36%
7%2% 0%
51%
39%
8%2% 0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 1 - Statement 2
Student Parent Staff
41
1.4
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Summary of Responses for Combined Cycle 7 Campuses
Domain 1 - Program Activities
3. The variety of academic activities
Domain 1 - Program Activities
4. The positive experiences in the program
45%
27%22%
4% 3%
53%
35%
11%
2% 0%
48%
39%
11%
2% 0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 1 - Statement 3
Student Parent Staff
52%
23%18%
5% 3%
57%
35%
7%0% 0%
43%47%
10%
0% 0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 1 - Statement 4
Student Parent Staff
42
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Summary of Responses for Combined Cycle 7 Campuses
Domain 1 - Program Activities
5. The opportunity to learn new material
47%
22% 22%
5% 5%
47%
38%
12%
2% 1%
34%
46%
18%
2% 0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 1 - Statement 5
Student Parent Staff
43
2.2
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Domain 2 - Program Environment
2. The special help given by staff
Domain 2 - Program Environment
1. The class sizes
Summary of Responses for Combined Cycle 7 Campuses
40%
25% 26%
4% 5%
52%
33%
15%
1% 0%
38% 40%
13%8%
1%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 2 - Statement 1
Student Parent Staff
51%
22%18%
4% 4%
55%
28%
14%
2% 0%
57%
29%
12%
2% 0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 2 - Statement 2
Student Parent Staff
44
2.4
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Domain 2 - Program Environment
4. The opportunity to meet adults
Summary of Responses for Combined Cycle 7 Campuses
Domain 2 - Program Environment
3. The attention and care given by staff
57%
20%16%
4% 4%
57%
32%
10%
1% 0%
64%
31%
5%0% 0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 2 - Statement 3
Student Parent Staff
36%
21%
29%
5%9%
35% 33%28%
3% 1%
16%
34%38%
12%
1%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 2 - Statement 4
Student Parent Staff
45
Domain 2 - Program Environment
6. The safe environment for students
Summary of Responses for Combined Cycle 7 Campuses
Domain 2 - Program Environment
5. The opportunity to make new friends
55%
20%16%
4% 5%
53%
33%
13%
0% 0%
37%41%
20%
2% 0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 2 - Statement 5
Student Parent Staff
64%
17% 15%
2% 3%
65%
29%
6%0% 0%
77%
21%
2% 0% 0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 2 - Statement 6
Student Parent Staff
46
Domain 3 - Student Attitudes
2. Student's attitude toward attending the after school program
Summary of Responses for Combined Cycle 7 Campuses
Domain 3 - Student Attitudes
1. Student's attitude toward being successful in the after school program
49%
27%
18%
2% 3%
53%
36%
10%
0% 1%
39%
47%
12%
2% 0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 3 - Statement 1
Student Parent Staff
43%
25%18%
7% 7%
51%
30%
14%
3% 1%
33%40%
19%
7%0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 3 - Statement 2
Student Parent Staff
47
3.3
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Domain 3 - Student Attitudes
4. Student's attitude toward an enjoyment for learning
Summary of Responses for Combined Cycle 7 Campuses
Domain 3 - Student Attitudes
3. Student's attitude toward being a part of the after school program
50%
24%18%
4% 4%
56%
34%
9%1% 0%
46%40%
14%
1% 0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 3 - Statement 3
Student Parent Staff
46%
25%20%
5% 4%
54%
32%
12%
2% 1%
36%43%
17%
4%0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 3 - Statement 4
Student Parent Staff
48
3.5
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Domain 3 - Student Attitudes
6. Student's attitude toward participating in the after school program in the future
Summary of Responses for Combined Cycle 7 Campuses
Domain 3 - Student Attitudes
5. Student's attitude toward the regular school day program
44%
19% 20%
8% 9%
45%
28%24%
2% 2%
19%
42%36%
3% 0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 3 - Statement 5
Student Parent Staff
49%
21% 18%
5% 7%
56%
29%
12%
2% 1%
37% 40%
22%
2% 0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 3 - Statement 6
Student Parent Staff
49
4.1
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Domain 4 - Student Behaviors
2. Improved student academic performance
Summary of Responses for Combined Cycle 7 Campuses
Domain 4 - Student Behaviors
1. Improved student disciplinary behavior
45%
24%21%
5% 5%
41%
27% 30%
0% 1%
20%
32%36%
10%
2%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 4 - Statement 1
Student Parent Staff
46%
24% 21%
5% 5%
39%34%
22%
3% 1%
28%
47%
22%
4%0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 4 - Statement 2
Student Parent Staff
50
4.3
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Summary of Responses for Combined Cycle 7 Campuses
Domain 4 - Student Behaviors
3. Improved student attendance in school
48%
20% 21%
5% 7%
38%
28% 31%
2% 0%
23%29%
45%
3% 0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied
Spring 2015 Stakeholder ResponsesDomain 4 - Statement 3
Student Parent Staff
51
52
IX. Assessment of Evaluator Recommendations and
Site Coordinator Commentary
Part A: Programmatic Themes and Issues across Centers
While each center has its own unique set of issues and resources, those are described in detail
under each center’s evaluation report located in the appendix section of this report. There are
some common issues that all centers experience in delivering their services to the population
most in need. Those common issues have been identified as the following:
1. A need to clearly identify and serve the population that is most in need of services from
an after school program.
2. A need for better utilization of the resources available for use in an after school program.
3. A need for better communication and coordination of services between the after school
staff and the regular school day staff.
4. A need for solicitation of community resources to better serve the student and parent
community population in need of services.
5. A need for incorporation of technology into all aspects of an after school program
including administration and instruction.
6. A need for an after school program to strive for excellence in its organization and
delivery of services.
7. A need to address the issue of sustainability on an annual basis, and the early
establishment of a plan for continuation of services beyond the grant period.
Part B: Recommendations
The evaluator made the following recommendations for 2015-2016:
1. It is a desirable goal for each center to develop into an exemplary after school program;
therefore, it must exemplify the characteristics of an effective after school program. Each site
coordinator was allowed the opportunity to select one of the 21 characteristics of an effective
after school program to emphasize for the 2015-2016 school year. The selections were as
follows:
Includes a program that addresses the academic, personal, physical and social skills of
students. (Centers 8 and 9)
Includes activities that encourage students to grow mentally, emotionally and physically.
(Centers 6 and 7)
Includes a teacher/student ratio that is reasonable for the particular activity offered.
(Center 7)
Includes parental activities that address needs and interests of parents. (Center 9)
Includes a balance of academic, enrichment, college and workforce readiness and family
and parental support service activities. (Center 1)
Includes collaboration and partnership building with community organizations. (Centers
3, 4 and 9)
53
Includes challenging activities and provides opportunities for the students to increase
their level of understanding of complex concepts. (Centers 1 and 9)
Includes plans for sustainability. (Centers 4 and 7)
Includes positive reinforcement that enhances confidence and increases self-esteem.
(Centers 4, 5 and 9)
Includes a balance of academic, enrichment, college and workforce readiness and family
and parental support service activities. (Centers 2, 6 and 9)
Includes objectives and goals that are well understood by all stakeholders. (Center 9)
Includes a program that is organized and structured and is appropriate for the child.
(Center 9)
Includes activities that encourage students to grow mentally, emotionally and physically.
(Center 9)
Includes a staff that is professional, trained, and friendly and maintains a positive
relationship with all of the children. (Centers 6 and 7)
Includes a high level of fun activities for students. (Centers 6 and 9)
Includes defined procedures for handling attendance and behavioral issues. (Center 10)
2. In order to provide students with a varied program of activities, this center should ensure that
at least two activities are scheduled that focus on the area of college and workforce readiness.
(Centers 8 and 9)
3. Enrichment activities can provide experiences for students that are not normally available
during the regular school day program. Therefore, this center should ensure that an appropriate
number of challenging, yet fun and exciting, enrichment activities are offered to students.
(Centers 3, 5 and 8)
4. Staff members have unique and special skills that go untouched. Therefore this center should
conduct a survey of staff that seeks suggestions of academic, enrichment, college/workforce and
family engagement activities that they or others could offer the students in the future. (Centers 6
and 9)
5. If asked, parents and community members can be effective partners or volunteers in the after
school program. Therefore, the site coordinator should seek ways to appropriately approach the
parents/community members and request suggestions from them as to how they could be active
participants and contributors to the after school program. (Centers 6 and 9)
6. Non-certified teachers are employed in the after school program and have roles that require
knowledge of effective instructional strategies and disciplinary skills. Therefore, the site
coordinator should provide staff development opportunities for these individuals to gain the
skills needed. (Center 7)
7. Student performance data is readily available and a system of dissemination should be in place
for ACE program teachers to better identify the specific instructional needs of students. (Centers
1 and 4)
54
8. Activities offered in the after school program should be attractive to students and every
activity offered in the after school program should have a plan for its implementation. Therefore,
the site coordinator should encourage and ensure that staff members develop their lesson plans
with creativity and focus on student response. (Centers 2, 3, 4 and 8)
9. For many students the only hands-on access that they will have to computers is at school.
Therefore, the site coordinator should ensure that high levels of technology use is incorporated
into all activities scheduled. (Centers 1, 2, 8 and 9)
10. All students need to be academically challenged to perform at the highest level possible.
Therefore, the site coordinator should ensure that activities offered will have some minimal
exposure to students performing at the synthesis and evaluation level. (Centers 1, 4 and 9)
11. The support of the campus administration is critical for the success of the ACE program.
Therefore, the site coordinator should strive to maintain and foster a strong communication
system and professional relationship with the campus administration. (Centers 5 and 10)
12. After a day in the classroom by students, students desire to be physically active after school.
The site coordinator needs to ensure that physical activity opportunities are provided for students
and even fitness classes for both students and parents can be offered. (Centers 6 and 9)
13. It is important that communication between the ACE program staff and the regular school
day staff exists. In order to be an effective partner with the regular school day staff, the site
coordinator should ensure that communication flows freely between the two and that alignment
exists between the after school program and the regular school day. (Centers 3, 6, 7 and 10)
14. The summer time provides an excellent opportunity for site coordinators to meet community
members and business leaders. The site coordinator should meet with these individuals during
the summer time and schedule them as guest speakers or presenters for the ACE program.
(Centers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7)
15. In order to maintain a high student interest level in the ACE program, the site coordinator
should conduct a survey of students that seeks the students’ suggestions for activities to be
offered in the future. (Centers 2 and 5)
16. All students need to be academically challenged to perform at the highest level possible.
Therefore, the site coordinator should ensure that activities offered will have some minimal
exposure to students performing at the synthesis and evaluation level. (Center 7)
17. New students to the campus are regularly entering and need to know about the after school
program. Therefore, the site coordinator should be available to meet with these parents and
students to explain the services offered via the ACE program. (Centers 9 and 10)
18. The fine arts have been ignored in many after school programs and they do not receive the
same level of support as the core content areas in many elementary schools. Therefore, the site
55
coordinator should strive to ensure that fine arts enrichment activities are scheduled in the ACE
program for students. (Center 10)
56
X. Next Steps
This section of the report is intended to give the evaluator’s response to the recommendations
selected for priority consideration by the site coordinators. Each recommendation required the
site coordinator to provide a series of statements that identified the next steps that would be taken
to address the recommendation selected. The evaluator will conduct two site visits during the
2015-2016 school year and will monitor the progress being made at each center to address the
recommendations selected for priority consideration by the site coordinators, project director and
evaluator. Individual center recommendations and their appropriate statement of next steps are
also identified in detail in Section X of each center’s final report.
Center
#
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
1 For many students the only hands-on access
that they will have to computers is at school.
Therefore, the site coordinator should ensure
that high levels of technology use is
incorporated into all activities scheduled.
We currently have all the physical resources to
incorporate technology in all ACE activates. However,
teacher comfort level in implementing and using these
resources is lacking. Thereof we will conduct trainings
before the start of the fall program to familiarize
teachers with these resources. And provide support for
teachers as they begin utilization during the fall
program.
1 The summer time provides an excellent
opportunity for site coordinators to meet
community members and business leaders. The
site coordinator should meet with these
individuals during the summer time and
schedule them as guest speakers or presenters
for the ACE program.
The site coordinator will schedule at least three meetings
with key community members between June and august,
to solicit guest speakers for the fall program.
1 All students need to be academically
challenged to perform at the highest level
possible. Therefore, the site coordinator should
ensure that activities offered will have some
minimal exposure to students performing at the
synthesis and evaluation level.
Work with the director of curriculum and instruction, as
well as ACE teachers, to develop at least one
evaluation/synthesis level lesson for each teacher, per
month, during the fall program.
2 Activities offered in the after school program
should be attractive to students and every
activity offered in the after school program
should have a plan for its implementation.
Therefore, the site coordinator should
encourage and ensure that staff members
develop their lesson plans with creativity and
focus on student response.
Teachers/ACE staff will be encouraged by the site
coordinator to allow student response to help guide their
lesson plans while making sure to include skills required
to master appropriate TEKS. Creativity for our age
group is a necessity in order to keep students attention
and maintain class management.
2 For many students the only hands-on access
that they will have to computers is at school.
Therefore, the site coordinator should ensure
that high levels of technology use is
incorporated into all activities scheduled.
We are allowed to have access to all technology and
software the school has to offer. Teachers will be
encouraged to use their smart boards as part of their
lessons along with iPad and computer games/research
when suitable.
2 The summer time provides an excellent
opportunity for site coordinators to meet
community members and business leaders. The
Summer planning is underway. The site coordinator will
meet with local community members/leaders to see
where it would be appropriate for these
57
site coordinator should meet with these
individuals during the summer time and
schedule them as guest speakers or presenters
for the ACE program.
individuals/groups to come speak or present for the
summer ACE program.
3 Enrichment activities can provide experiences
for students that are not normally available
during the regular school day program.
Therefore, this center should ensure that an
appropriate number of challenging yet fun and
exciting enrichment activities are offered to
students.
The site coordinator will distribute surveys to students
asking for suggestions for new activities. The site
coordinator will consult with school day-staff members
to bring new, fun and exciting, activities.
3 Activities offered in the after school program
should be attractive to students and every
activity offered in the after school program
should have a plan for its implementation.
Therefore, the site coordinator should
encourage and ensure that staff members
develop their lesson plans with creativity and
focus on student response.
The site coordinator will meet with each staff member
individually and walk through a lesson plan form
together. The site coordinator will collect lesson plans
from staff members for each day an Activity is lead.
3 The summer time provides an excellent
opportunity for site coordinators to meet
community members and business leaders. The
site coordinator should meet with these
individuals during the summer time and
schedule them as guest speakers or presenters
for the ACE program.
The site coordinator will use this summer to meet with
community members and business leaders that already
have ties to the school. The site coordinator will
schedule guest speakers for the Computer Programming
Camp scheduled this summer.
4 In order to provide students with a varied
program of activities, this center should ensure
that at least two activities are scheduled that
focus on the area of college and workforce
readiness.
We currently have a full time staff member that works
with upper classmen to prepare them for college and
workforce readiness. This staff member works after
school with students who request his assistance. As Site
Coordinator I hope to install more for credit classes after
school during the next school year that will be more
oriented to workforce readiness.
4 Staff members have unique and special skills
that go untouched. Therefore this center should
conduct a survey of staff that seeks suggestions
of academic, enrichment, college/workforce
and family engagement activities that they or
others could offer the students in the future.
We have made definite steps forward this year toward
opening up new classes for our teachers who have
special interests. We know have a Female Empowerment
class lead by one of our daytime teachers who has a
background in the subject matter. Next year we hope to
have more specialized coursework that speaks to our
student population's individualized needs.
4 Non-certified teachers are employed in the
after school program and have roles that
require knowledge of effective instructional
strategies and disciplinary skills. Therefore, the
site coordinator should provide staff
development opportunities for these
individuals to gain the skills needed.
We now have few/no teachers who are not certified. We
will however continue to support continuing education
opportunities for all of our staff.
5 In order to maintain a high student interest
level in the ACE program, the site coordinator
should conduct a survey of students that seeks
their suggestions for activities to be offered in
the future.
Since the Spring semester is complete, within two
weeks, the site coordinator will develop and administer a
student survey of enrichment classes that interest them
for the Summer and/or the Fall semester. The site
coordinator will also survey teachers and aids as to
58
preferences of enrichment activities to ensure teacher
buy-in and support.
5 Enrichment activities can provide experiences
for students that are not normally available
during the regular school day program.
Therefore, this center should ensure that an
appropriate number of challenging yet fun and
exciting enrichment activities are offered to
students.
The surveys, mentioned in Priority Rank 1 will be used
to supply ideas to ensure fun and exciting enrichment
classes are continually offered to the students. The
appropriate number of challenging, yet fun and exciting,
enrichment classes will be determined as an on-going
process, however, these enrichment classes should be at
least more than half of the classes offered.
5 The summer time provides an excellent
opportunity for site coordinators to meet
community members and business leaders.
The site coordinator should meet with these
individuals during the summer time and
schedule them as guest speakers or presenters
for the ACE program.
The site coordinator will join and attend club meetings
in order to meet community members and business
leaders. She will also strive to arrange these individuals
as guest speakers or presenters during the 2015-2016
year.
6 Includes a high level of fun activities for
students.
I will use student surveys and suggestions.
6 Includes a balance of academic, enrichment,
college and workforce readiness and family
and parental support service activities.
I will seek out community members, staff, and/or parents
that are willing to share their knowledge about college
and workforce readiness. It is also the intent of the Site
Coordinator to put together some valuable parent
support services through local means.
6 After a day in the classroom by students,
students desire to be physically active after
school. The site coordinator needs to ensure
that physical activity opportunities are
provided for students and even fitness classes
for both students and parents can be offered.
The goal is to offer students the opportunity to be in
sessions that will offer them a high level of movement.
For example: dance, fitness fun, open gym and outdoor
play.
7 Non-certified teachers are employed in the
after school program and have roles that
require knowledge of effective instructional
strategies and disciplinary skills. Therefore, the
site coordinator should provide staff
development opportunities for these
individuals to gain the skills needed.
Site Coordinator will attend conferences and webinars to
gather tools necessary to train the non-certified teachers.
Develop a training plan to be implemented in the next
year.
7 All students need to be academically
challenged to perform at the highest level
possible. Therefore, the site coordinator should
ensure that activities offered will have some
minimal exposure to students performing at the
synthesis and evaluation level.
Site coordinator will review enrichment lesson plans to
make sure students are being academically challenged.
We will meet with school day teachers to identify
student’s current academic levels.
7 The summer time provides an excellent
opportunity for site coordinators to meet
community members and business leaders. The
site coordinator should meet with these
individuals during the summer time and
schedule them as guest speakers or presenters
for the ACE program.
Identify possible community members and business
leaders to meet.
8 Includes activities that help develop the social,
physical and mental needs of children.
These needs will be addressed as follows:
Social – Through fieldtrips and guest speakers students
be introduced to a variety of people/environments and
59
learn how to adapt in different situations.
Physical – Continuing to have activities such as flag
football, volleyball, track and possibly basketball will
provide an environment where students are moving and
learning the importance of working as a team, while
experiencing a sense of accomplishment.
8 Includes a balance of academic, enrichment,
college and workforce readiness and family
and parental support service activities.
When creating the 2015-2016 schedule efforts will be
made to enhance our ACE program with stronger tutorial
sessions, enrichment classes, having at least 1 college
engagement sessions for each half of the year, 1 college
tour during the summer, at least 2 career speakers each
half of the year, and having parent sessions that
incorporate our students in order to garner more parent
participation.
8 It is important that communication between the
ACE program staff and the regular school day
staff exists. In order to be an effective partner
with the regular school day staff, the site
coordinator should ensure that communication
flows freely between the two and that
alignment exists between the after school
program and the regular school day.
In addition, to our staff meetings I will send out a
weekly digest, via e-mail, to the staff sharing course
information, program updates, student highlights, school
day information and any pertinent information that will
be beneficial to us growing as a team. These efforts will
only enhance our program and be a part of our
continuous improvement.
9 In order to provide students with a varied
program of activities, this center should ensure
that at least two activities are scheduled that
focus on the area of college and workforce
readiness.
Community members will visit twice a month to talk
about their professions and discuss the steps necessary to
work within their respective professional fields.
9 Staff members have unique and special skills
that go untouched. Therefore this center should
conduct a survey of staff that seeks suggestions
of academic, enrichment, college/workforce
and family engagement activities that they or
others could offer the students in the future.
Conduct a survey of staff members, asking about each
staff member’s respective skills, as well as which skills
staff members would be interested in using in the
afterschool program.
9 After a day in the classroom by students,
students desire to be physically active after
school. The site coordinator needs to ensure
that physical activity opportunities are
provided for students and even fitness classes
for both students and parents can be offered.
Part of the afterschool programming will include
physical fitness activities such as basketball, football,
relays.
Fitness classes will be available for parents.
10 The support of the campus administration is
critical for the success of the ACE program.
Therefore, the site coordinator should strive to
maintain and foster a strong communication
system and professional relationship with the
campus administration.
1. Make program and activity schedules known to all
administration.
2. Communicate through email and phone calls closely
with all campuses.
3. Offer help and services provided by the ACE
program if needed by campuses.
10 It is important that communication between the
ACE program staff and the regular school day
staff exists. In order to be an effective partner
with the regular school day staff, the site
coordinator should ensure that communication
1. Tutoring pull-outs offered to regular school staff as
extra income.
2. Services and schedules made readily available to all
regular school staff and ACE staff.
3. ACE program to participate with regular school
60
flows freely between the two and that
alignment exists between the after school
program and the regular school day.
scheduled activities when able.
10 The fine arts have been ignored in many after
school programs and they do not receive the
same level of support as the core content areas
in many elementary schools. Therefore, the site
coordinator should strive to ensure that fine
arts enrichment activities are scheduled in the
ACE program for students.
1. We have an established art program and we will
continue to build new opportunities for art.
2. We will set-up a practice area for Jr. High band
students to practice during the second hour.
3. A BGC employee plans to offer a gymnastics type
class for second hour on specific days.
10 New students to the campus are regularly
entering and need to know about the after
school program. Therefore, the site coordinator
should be available to meet with these parents
and students to explain the services offered via
the ACE program.
1. We will have applications readily available in the
campus offices for new students.
2. Parent orientation will be offered ASAP to new
students.
3. Sign-up for new students will be available during
regular school hours AND ACE working hours.
61
XI. Evaluator Information
Part A: Qualifications of Independent Evaluator
Raymond Canizales, President of Canizales Consulting Services, has served as an educator since
1970 and has been involved in all phases of the education system including curriculum
development, human resource services and assessment/research and development. Extensive
evaluative experience has been obtained in working with after school federal program grants and
with Texas after school grants under cycles 5, 6, 7 and 8. Those after school grants have included
twelve (12) school districts, one (1) Regional Education Service Center, one (1) private school
and six (6) charter schools.
Canizales Consulting Services has also been the primary evaluator for a variety of federal and
state grants including, Safe Schools Healthy Students, Small Learning Communities, Texas High
School Completion, Comprehensive Reform, Science and Math Education at both the public
school and higher education level, TARGET (Computer Technology), Mentoring and
Professional Development Partnerships. Consultative services have also been provided to school
districts seeking assistance with reorganization efforts involving Student and Family Services,
Human Resource Services and Accountability and Assessment departments. Canizales
Consulting Services also serves as a contracted hearing officer for the Round Rock Independent
School District Legal Services Office in matters pertaining to employee grievances, parent
complaints and student disciplinary issues.
Part B: Scope of Work and Compensation
Canizales Consulting Services have been actively involved in all phases of the center’s
evaluation process. Guidance and assistance has been provided by the external evaluator since
the beginning of the school year. Mr. Canizales has participated in the development and
modifications done to the Logic Model, the completion and submission of Interim Reports 1 and
2, and the completion of the current final center evaluation report. Through his monitoring and
participation in each phase of the evaluation process, and his on-site visits to the center, he has
developed a thorough knowledge of the ACE program as it exists on this site.
Canizales Consulting Services was contracted in September 2011 to oversee the evaluation of the
CTAC Cycle 7 grant. The scope of work involved a variety of activities including:
1. the development of an evaluation management plan;
2. the creation of a relational database system and data collection forms;
3. the development, administration, and collection of stakeholder surveys of teachers,
students, and parents;
4. the conducting of on-site meetings with project staff for purposes of data collection,
technical assistance, and planning purposes;
5. the conducting of two on-site campus visits per school year for purpose of observing
program activities and reporting findings to administrative program personnel;
62
6. the providing of data analysis and reports from stakeholder surveys collected;
7. the providing of data analysis of student demographic, performance and achievement
data;
8. the assistance given in the development and submission of the Logic Model and Interim
Reports 1 and 2;
9. the assistance provided in designing the template for completion of each center’s final
evaluation report and,
10. the writing of the grantee final evaluation report.
Canizales Consulting Services was paid $30,000 compensation for the services outlined above.
63
Appendices: Center Executive Summaries
Center 1: Bartlett Schools
Center 2: Rockdale Elementary
Center 3: San Juan Diego Catholic High School
Center 4: Katherine Anne Porter Charter School
Center 5: Rockdale Intermediate School
Center 6: Rockdale Junior High School
Center 7: Texas Empowerment Academy Elementary School
Center 8: Texas Empowerment Academy Middle School
Center 9: Rockdale High School
Center 10: Smithville Elementary School
Education Service Center, Region XIII 21st Century Community Learning Centers
Cycle 7
Bartlett Schools 2015 Executive Summary
Neil Jeffery Site Coordinator
July 31, 2015
65
Executive Summary
A. General Information
The Afterschool Center on Education (ACE) is the program administered through the Texas
Education Agency for the federally funded 21st Century Community Learning Center (CCLS)
grants authorized under the Title IV, Part B of the Elementary and Secondary Act (ESEA), as
amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (NCLB; Public Law 107-110). The purpose
of ACE programs is to support the creation of community learning centers to provide academic
enrichment opportunities during non-school hours for children who attend high-poverty and low-
performing schools. A complete center report, as outlined in the Texas ACE Independent
Evaluation Guide 2014-15, was prepared and has provided the information contained in this
executive summary report.
Identification of Location: Bartlett Schools is one of ten centers that are a part of the Region
XIII Educational Service Center Cycle 7 collaboration.
Identification of Population Served: The ACE program on the Bartlett Schools campus is
designed to address specific needs of students and parents in the local campus community.
Bartlett is a community that for years has dealt with high rates of rural poverty. 73% of Bartlett’s
students are economically disadvantaged, and 58% of Bartlett’s students are currently coded as at
risk. Beyond the social challenges, Bartlett as school has struggled to meet these students’
Academic needs, currently Bartlett has been designated by the state as a school in which
Improvement is Required. This was due to poor performance in index 3 under state
accountability, which measures performance gaps between economic disadvantage groups and
minority sub pops. Overall, STAAR passage rates barely met the state minimum requirements at
60%. However, students at Bartlett Schools performed well below standards, where district-
passing rates were at 48%. The ACE program is an important tool to help bridge the academic
challenges many of Bartlett students face. Bartlett Schools is an elementary and middle school
campus serving 289 students, of which 270 were enrolled as ACE program participants. A total
of 70 parents were also served.
Identification of ACE Program Staff Participation:
Teacher Categories # %
Campus certified teachers 10 71%
Non campus certified teachers 0 0%
Non-certified teachers 4 29%
Total number teachers in ACE 14
66
Identification of Level of Funding:
Bartlett Schools
Budget Amount
Cost Per Student
6100 - Payroll $135,300 $704.69
6200 - Contracted $8,260 $43.02
6300 - Supplies $7,300 $38.02
6400 - Operational Costs $10,140 $52.81
Total Budgeted Amount: $161,000 $838.54
B. Summary of Findings Related to Desired Intermediate Outcomes
Finding 1: Achievement in Regular Classroom Academic Performance
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had a .25 decrease in their
English Language Arts grades from semester one to semester two.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees had a .30 gain in their Mathematics
grades from semester one to semester two.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a .24 decrease in their Science grades
from semester one to semester two.
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 1.61 decrease in their Social
Studies grades from semester one to semester two.
Finding 2: Achievement in State Assessment Performance (STAAR Test)
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 65% passing rate on the
English Language Arts STAAR test, as compared to a passing rate of 70% for all students
enrolled on the campus.
Mathematics: Mathematics STAAR not scored.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 37% passing rate on the Science STAAR
test, as compared to a passing rate of 38% for all students enrolled on the campus.
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 17% passing rate on the Social
Studies STAAR test, as compared to a passing rate of 15% for all students enrolled on the
campus.
67
Finding 3: Achievement in Attendance Improvement
Determining average daily attendance for any group of students is not an easy task nor
can the result be given too much merit. There are several factors that can impact the
calculation of average days attended by groups of students that may weigh positively or
negatively on the end result. For example, if a subset of a group of comparison students
enrolled on the campus in the middle of a semester, the subset’s lower number of days in
attendance would negatively impact the outcome attendance records, when the total
group’s average attendance is calculated. Likewise, in a situation where two semesters
contain significantly different attendance days, the semester with the greater number of
days would have a greater possibility of having a positive result when calculating an
average attendance for a group of students. In the case of this center, the average daily
attendance of regular ACE program enrollees decreased by 3.25 days from semester one
to semester two.
Finding 4: Achievement in Behavior Improvement
With regard to noticeable improvement in student behavior, 84% of students, 74% of
parents and 38% of staff either agreed, or strongly agreed, that ACE program students
had improved in their behavior during the 2014-2015 school year.
Finding 5: Achievement in Promotion Improvement
Improvement in academic performance and in regular school day attendance are two
factors that contribute greatly to student promotion success. On the survey administered
in spring, 77% of students, 71% of parents, and 88% of staff agreed or strongly agreed
that the grades of ACE program students had improved during the 2014-2015 school
year. On that same survey 81% of students, 71% of parents, and 51% of staff agreed or
strongly agreed that the attendance of ACE program students had improved during the
2014-2015 school year.
Finding 6: Achievement in Graduation Improvement (Applicable only to High School)
68
C. Key Stakeholder Survey Results
In spring 2015 Bartlett Schools’ ACE center administered surveys to students, parents and staff
members. Survey completion participants included 78 students, 31 parents and 8 staff members.
The primary reason for surveying the stakeholders was to obtain their opinion regarding the
effectiveness of the 21st Century CLC program, particularly as an outcome related to the
perceived behaviors and attitudes of student participants.
Survey Response Ranges: 1 = very dissatisfied or strongly disagree to
5 = very satisfied or strongly agree
1. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of enrichment
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 2 – student; 2 - parent; 2 - staff)
2. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of academic
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 3 – student; 3 - parent; 3 - staff)
3. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that students had a positive
attitude toward the regular school day program as a result of being in the ACE program.
(Statements #: 19 – student; 19 - parent; 21 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
2 4.35 84% 2 4.16 84% 1 4.00 88%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
1 4.53 89% 3 4.06 77% 2 3.75 79%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 3.83 67% 1 3.47 68% 3 3.75 63%
69
4. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student disciplinary
behavior improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 14 – student;
14 - parent; 16 - staff)
5. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student academic
performance improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 15 –
student; 15 - parent; 17 - staff)
6. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student attendance in
the regular school day improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #:
16 – student; 16 - parent; 18 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
1 4.33 84% 2 4.10 74% 3 3.00 38%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 4.26 77% 3 3.90 71% 1 4.00 88%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
1 4.33 81% 2 3.94 71% 3 3.38 51%
70
D. Evaluator Recommendations and Next Steps
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
1 For many students the only hands-on
access that they will have to computers
is at school. Therefore, the site
coordinator should ensure that high
levels of technology use is
incorporated into all activities
scheduled.
We currently have all the physical resources to
incorporate technology in all ACE activates.
However, teacher comfort level in
implementing and using these resources is
lacking. Therefore we will conduct trainings
before the start of the fall program to
familiarize teachers with these resources and
provide support for teachers as they begin
utilization during the fall program.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
2 The summer time provides an excellent
opportunity for site coordinators to
meet community members and
business leaders. The site coordinator
should meet with these individuals
during the summer time and schedule
them as guest speakers or presenters
for the ACE program.
The site coordinator will schedule at least
three meetings with key community members
between June and august, to solicit guest
speakers for the fall program.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
3 All students need to be academically
challenged to perform at the highest
level possible. Therefore, the site
coordinator should ensure that
activities offered will have some
minimal exposure to students
performing at the synthesis and
evaluation level.
Work with the director of curriculum and
instruction as well as ACE teachers to develop
at least one evaluation/synthesis level lesson
for each teacher per month during the fall
program.
Education Service Center, Region XIII 21st Century Community Learning Centers
Cycle 7
Rockdale Elementary 2015 Executive Summary
Valarie Willingham Site Coordinator
July 31, 2014
72
Executive Summary
A. General Information
The Afterschool Center on Education (ACE) is the program administered through the Texas
Education Agency for the federally funded 21st Century Community Learning Center (CCLS)
grants authorized under the Title IV, Part B of the Elementary and Secondary Act (ESEA), as
amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (NCLB; Public Law 107-110). The
purpose of ACE programs is to support the creation of community learning centers to provide
academic enrichment opportunities during non-school hours for children who attend high-
poverty and low-performing schools. A complete center report as outlined in the Texas ACE
Independent Evaluation Guide 2014-15 was prepared and has provided the information
contained in this executive summary report.
Identification of Location: Rockdale Elementary (RES) is one of nine centers that are a part
of the Region XIII Educational Service Center Cycle 7 collaboration.
Identification of Population Served: The ACE program on the Rockdale Elementary School
campus is designed to address specific needs of students and parents in the local campus
community. Since this campus is comprised of a large number of social economically
disadvantaged students, there is a need that arises from this fact. This also means that the
campus is composed of a large percentage of students who are identified as at-risk. Rockdale
Elementary is an elementary campus serving 432 students of 163 which were enrolled as ACE
program participants. Of those 147 ACE program enrollees, 119 were regular ACE program
participants attending at least 30 days or more of programing activities. A total of 143 parents
were also served.
Identification of ACE Program Staff Participation:
Teacher Categories # %
Campus certified teachers 22 88%
Non campus certified teachers 1 4%
Non-certified teachers 2 8%
Total number teachers in ACE 25
73
Identification of Level of Funding:
Rockdale Elementary
Budget Amount
Cost Per Student
6100 - Payroll $115,167 $967.79
6200 - Contracted $300 $2.52
6300 - Supplies $10,661 $89.59
6400 - Operational Costs $12,360 $103.87
Total Budgeted Amount: $138,488 $1,163.77
B. Summary of Findings Related to Desired Intermediate Outcomes
Finding 1: Achievement in Regular Classroom Academic Performance
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had a +1.28 gain in their
English Language Arts grades from semester one to semester two.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -0.68 decrease in their
Mathematics grades from semester one to semester two.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a +2.43 gain in their Science grades from
semester one to semester two.
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had a +0.89 gain in their Social Studies
grades from semester one to semester two.
Finding 2: Achievement in State Assessment Performance (STAAR Test)
English Language Arts: NA
Mathematics: NA
Science: NA
Social Studies: NA
Finding 3: Achievement in Attendance Improvement
Determining average daily attendance for any group of students is not an easy task nor
can the result be given too much merit. There are several factors that can impact the
calculation of average days attended by groups of students that may weigh positively or
negatively on the end result. For example, if part of a group of comparison students
74
enrolled on the campus in the middle of a semester, their lower number of days in
attendance would negatively impact the outcome when the group’s average attendance is
calculated. Likewise, in a situation where two semesters contain significantly different
attendance days, the semester with the greater number of days would have a greater
possibility of have a positive result when calculating an average attendance for a group of
students. In the case of this center, the average daily attendance of regular ACE program
enrollees increased by +19.24 days from semester one to semester two.
Finding 4: Achievement in Behavior Improvement
With regard to noticeable improvement in student behavior, 95% of students, 67% of
parents and 26% of staff either agreed or strongly agreed that ACE program students had
improved in their behavior during the 2014-2015 school year.
Finding 5: Achievement in Promotion Improvement
Improvement in academic performance and in regular school day attendance are two
factors that contribute greatly to student promotion success. On the survey administered
in spring 97% of students, 67% of parents and 56% of staff agreed or strongly agreed that
the grades of ACE program students had improved during the 2014-2015 school year. On
that same survey 98% of students, 66% of parents and 44% of staff agreed or strongly
agreed that the attendance of ACE program students had improved during the 2014-2015
school year.
Finding 6: Achievement in Graduation Improvement (Applicable only to High School)
NA
75
C. Key Stakeholder Survey Results
In spring 2015 the Rockdale Elementary ACE center administered surveys to students, parents
and staff members. Survey completion participants included 60 students, 18 parents and 23 staff
members. The primary reason for surveying the stakeholders was to obtain their opinion
regarding the effectiveness of the 21st Century CLC program, particularly as an outcome related
to the perceived behaviors and attitudes of student participants.
Survey Response Ranges: 1 = very dissatisfied or strongly disagree to
5 = very satisfied or strongly agree
1. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of enrichment
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 2 – student; 2 - parent; 2 - staff)
2. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of academic
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 3 – student; 3 - parent; 3 - staff)
3. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that students had a positive
attitude toward the regular school day program as a result of being in the ACE program.
(Statements #: 19 – student; 19 - parent; 21 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
2 4.72 90% 1 4.78 100% 3 4.17 82%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
2 4.69 92% 1 4.67 94% 3 4.09 74%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
1 4.79 95% 2 4.50 89% 3 3.48 39%
76
4. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student disciplinary
behavior improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 14 – student;
14 - parent; 16 - staff)
5. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student academic
performance improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 15 –
student; 15 - parent; 17 - staff)
6. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student attendance in
the regular school day improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #:
16 – student; 16 - parent; 18 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
1 4.72 95% 2 4.28 67% 3 3.09 26%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
1 4.77 97% 2 4.17 67% 3 3.61 56%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
1 4.86 98% 2 4.11 66% 3 3.48 44%
77
D. Evaluator Recommendations and Next Steps
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
1 Activities offered in the after school
program should be attractive to
students and every activity offered in
the after school program should have
a plan for its implementation.
Therefore, the site coordinator should
encourage, and ensure, that staff
members develop their lesson plans
with creativity and focus on student
response.
Teachers/ACE staff will be encouraged by
the site coordinator to allow student
responses to help guide lesson plans, while
making sure to include skills required to
master appropriate TEKS. Creativity, for our
age group, is a necessity in order to keep
students attention and maintain class
management.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
2 For many students the only hands-on
access that they will have to
computers is at school. Therefore, the
site coordinator should ensure that
high levels of technology use is
incorporated into all activities
scheduled.
We are allowed to have access to all
technology and software the school has to
offer. Teachers will be encouraged to use
their smart boards as part of their lessons
along with iPad and computer
games/research when suitable.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
3 The summer time provides an
excellent opportunity for site
coordinators to meet community
members and business leaders. The
site coordinator should meet with
these individuals during the summer
time and schedule them as guest
speakers or presenters for the ACE
program.
Summer planning is underway. The site
coordinator will meet with local community
members/leaders to see where it would be
appropriate for these individuals/groups to
come speak or present for the summer ACE
program.
Education Service Center, Region XIII 21st Century Community Learning Centers
Cycle 7
San Juan Diego Catholic High School 2015 Executive Summary
Lucy Flores Site Coordinator
July 31, 2015
79
Executive Summary
A. General Information
The Afterschool Center on Education (ACE) is the program administered through the Texas
Education Agency for the federally funded 21st Century Community Learning Center (CCLS)
grants authorized under the Title IV, Part B of the Elementary and Secondary Act (ESEA), as
amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (NCLB; Public Law 107-110). The purpose
of ACE programs is to support the creation of community learning centers to provide academic
enrichment opportunities during non-school hours for children who attend high-poverty and low-
performing schools. A complete center report as outlined in the Texas ACE Independent
Evaluation Guide 2014-15 was prepared and has provided the information contained in this
executive summary report.
Identification of Location: San Juan Diego Catholic High School is one of ten centers that are a
part of the Region XIII Educational Service Center Cycle 7 collaboration.
Identification of Population Served: The ACE program on the San Juan Diego Catholic High
School campus is designed to address specific needs of students and parents in the local campus
community. San Juan Diego is a college prep school that focuses on providing core academic
curriculum for students, because of this the electives provided are few. The 21st CCLC program
provides the needed elective courses the student’s desire and need. These electives include
music, art, drama, conditioning, and woodshop. The majority of our students do not get picked
up until 6:00 PM by parents, therefore, the afterschool program offers students a safe place to be
while providing enrichment opportunities for the students. San Juan Diego Catholic High School
is a high school campus serving 186 students of which 186 were enrolled as ACE program
participants. Of those 186 ACE program enrollees, 159 were regular ACE program participants
attending at least 30 days or more of programing activities. A total of 131 parents were also
served.
Identification of ACE Program Staff Participation:
Teacher Categories # %
Campus certified teachers 11 52.5%
Non campus certified teachers 4 19 %
Non-certified teachers 6 28.5%
Total number teachers in ACE 21
80
Identification of Level of Funding:
B. Summary of Findings Related to Desired Intermediate Outcomes
Finding 1: Achievement in Regular Classroom Academic Performance
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had a +4.0 gain in their
English Language Arts grades from semester one to semester two.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -0.30 decrease in their
Mathematics grades from semester one to semester two.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a +2.20 gain in their Science grades from
semester one to semester two.
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -1.3 decrease in their Social
Studies grades from semester one to semester two.
Finding 2: Achievement in State Assessment Performance (STAAR Test)
English Language Arts: N/A
Mathematics: N/A
Science: N/A
Social Studies: N/A
Finding 3: Achievement in Attendance Improvement
Determining average daily attendance for any group of students is not an easy task nor
can the result be given too much merit. There are several factors that can impact the
calculation of average days attended by groups of students that may weigh positively or
negatively on the end result. For example, if part of a group of comparison students
San Juan Diego Catholic High School
Budget Amount
Cost Per Student
6100 - Payroll $94,500 $594.34
6200 - Contracted $44,000 $276.73
6300 - Supplies $28,000 $176.10
6400 - Operational Costs $9,500 $59.75
Total Budgeted Amount: $176,000 $1,106.92
81
enrolled on the campus in the middle of a semester, their lower number of days in
attendance would negatively impact the outcome when the group’s average attendance is
calculated. Likewise, in a situation where two semesters contain significantly different
attendance days, the semester with the greater number of days would have a greater
possibility of have a positive result when calculating an average attendance for a group of
students. In the case of this center, the average daily attendance of regular ACE program
enrollees decreased by -1.0 days from semester one to semester two.
Finding 4: Achievement in Behavior Improvement
With regard to noticeable improvement in student behavior, 84% of students, 80% of
parents and 83% of staff either agreed or strongly agreed that ACE program students had
improved in their behavior during the 2014-2015 school year.
Finding 5: Achievement in Promotion Improvement
Improvement in academic performance and in regular school day attendance are two
factors that contribute greatly to student promotion success. On the survey administered
in spring 88% of students, 84% of parents and 82% of staff agreed or strongly agreed that
the grades of ACE program students had improved during the 2014-2015 school year. On
that same survey 88% of students, 84% of parents and 82% of staff agreed or strongly
agreed that the attendance of ACE program students had improved during the 2014-2015
school year.
Finding 6: Achievement in Graduation Improvement (Applicable only to High School)
According to the most recent (2013-2014) Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) the
completion rate/retention rate for San Juan Diego Catholic High School was 92%.
82
C. Key Stakeholder Survey Results
In spring 2015 the San Juan Diego Catholic High School ACE center administered surveys to
students, parents and staff members. Survey completion participants included 102 students, 17
parents and 12 staff members. The primary reason for surveying the stakeholders was to obtain
their opinion regarding the effectiveness of the 21st Century CLC program, particularly as an
outcome related to the perceived behaviors and attitudes of student participants.
Survey Response Ranges: 1 = very dissatisfied or strongly disagree to
5 = very satisfied or strongly agree
1. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of enrichment
activities offered to the students.(Statements #: 2 – student; 2- parent; 2- staff)
2. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of academic
activities offered to the students.(Statements #: 3 – student; 3- parent; 3- staff)
3.The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that students had a positive
attitude toward the regular school day program as a result of being in the ACE
program.(Statements #: 19 – student; 19- parent; 21- staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank
Rank
Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
3 3.77 64% 2 4.47 88% 1 4.75 100%
Students Parents Staff
Rank
Rank
Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
3 3.70 56% 2 4.47 88% 1 4.58 100%
Students Parents Staff
Rank
Rank
Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 3.60 51% 1 4.47 88% 3 3.25 33%
83
4. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student disciplinary
behavior improved as a result of being in the after school program.(Statements #: 14 – student;
14- parent; 16- staff)
5. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student academic
performance improved as a result of being in the after school program.(Statements #: 15 –
student; 15- parent; 17- staff)
6. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student attendance in
the regular school day improved as a result of being in the after school program.(Statements #:
16 – student; 16- parent; 18- staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank
Rank
Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 3.64 54% 1 4.24 76% 3 3.67 50%
Students Parents Staff
Rank
Rank
Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
3 3.74 58% 1 4.35 82% 2 4.17 75%
Students Parents Staff
Rank
Rank
Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 3.67 56% 1 4.47 88% 3 3.50 41%
84
D. Evaluator Recommendations and Next Steps
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
1 Enrichment activities can provide
experiences for students that are not
normally available during the regular
school day program. Therefore, this center
should ensure that an appropriate number
of challenging yet fun and exciting
enrichment activities are offered to
students.
The site coordinator will distribute surveys to
students asking for suggestions for new activities.
The site coordinator will consult with school day
staff members to bring new fun and exciting
activities.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
2 Activities offered in the after school
program should be attractive to students
and every activity offered in the after
school program should have a plan for its
implementation. Therefore, the site
coordinator should encourage and ensure
that staff members develop their lesson
plans with creativity and focus on student
response.
The site coordinator will meet with each staff
member individually and walk through a lesson
plan form together. The site coordinator will
collect lesson plans from staff members for each
day an Activity is lead.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
3 The summer time provides an excellent
opportunity for site coordinators to meet
community members and business leaders.
The site coordinator should meet with
these individuals during the summer time
and schedule them as guest speakers or
presenters for the ACE program.
The site coordinator will use this summer to
meet with community members and business
leaders that already have ties to the school. The
site coordinator will schedule guest speakers for
the Computer Programming Camp scheduled
this summer.
Education Service Center, Region XIII
21st Century Community Learning Centers Cycle 7
Katherine Anne Porter Charter School 2015 Executive Summary
Peggy Wilfong Site Coordinator
July 31, 2015
86
Executive Summary
A. General Information
The Afterschool Center on Education (ACE) is the program administered through the Texas
Education Agency for the federally funded 21st Century Community Learning Center (CCLS)
grants authorized under the Title IV, Part B of the Elementary and Secondary Act (ESEA), as
amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (NCLB; Public Law 107-110). The purpose
of ACE programs is to support the creation of community learning centers to provide academic
enrichment opportunities during non-school hours for children who attend high-poverty and low-
performing schools. A complete center report as outlined in the Texas ACE Independent
Evaluation Guide 2014-15 was prepared and has provided the information contained in this
executive summary report.
Identification of Location: Katherine Anne Porter School is one of ten centers that are a part of
the Region XVIII Educational Service Center Cycle 7 collaboration.
Identification of Population Served: The ACE program on the Katherine Anne Porter School
campus is designed to address specific needs of students and parents in the local campus
community. The campus has a large population of at-risk and economically disadvantaged
students who are in particular need of tutorial services. Katherine Anne Porter School is a high
school campus serving 143 students of which 143 were enrolled as ACE program participants.
Of those 143 ACE program enrollees, 102 were regular ACE program participants attending at
least 30 days or more of programing activities. A total of 88 parents were also served.
Identification of ACE Program Staff Participation:
Teacher Categories # %
Campus certified teachers 30 84%
Non campus certified teachers 3 8%
Non-certified teachers 3 8%
Total number teachers in ACE 36
Identification of Level of Funding:
Katherine Anne Porter Charter School
Budget Amount
Cost Per Student
6100 - Payroll $95,826 $939.47
6200 - Contracted $15,000 $147.05
6300 - Supplies $24,500 $240.20
6400 - Operational Costs $16,000 $156.86
Total Budgeted Amount: $151,326 $1,483.58
87
B. Summary of Findings Related to Desired Intermediate Outcomes
Finding 1: Achievement in Regular Classroom Academic Performance
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had a +2.58 gain in their
English Language Arts grades from semester one to semester two.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees had a +0.51 gain in their Mathematics
grades from semester one to semester two.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a +1.16 gain in their Science grades from
semester one to semester two.
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had a - 1.15 decrease in their Social
Studies grades from semester one to semester two.
Finding 2: Achievement in State Assessment Performance (STAAR Test)
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had an 77.8% passing rate on
the English Language Arts STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 74.6% for all
students enrolled on the campus.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees had an 50% passing rate on the
Mathematics STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 45.5% for all students enrolled
on the campus.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had an 76.9% passing rate on the Science
STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 62.5% for all students enrolled on the
campus.
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had an 97.2% passing rate on the Social
Studies STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 97.8% for all students enrolled on
the campus.
Finding 3: Achievement in Attendance Improvement
Determining average daily attendance for any group of students is not an easy task nor
can the result be given too much merit. There are several factors that can impact the
calculation of average days attended by groups of students that may weigh positively or
negatively on the end result. For example, if part of a group of comparison students
enrolled on the campus in the middle of a semester, their lower number of days in
attendance would negatively impact the outcome when the group’s average attendance is
calculated. Likewise, in a situation where two semesters contain significantly different
attendance days, the semester with the greater number of days would have a greater
88
possibility of have a positive result when calculating an average attendance for a group of
students. In the case of this center, the average daily attendance of regular ACE program
enrollees decreased by -1.13 days from semester one to semester two.
Finding 4: Achievement in Behavior Improvement
With regard to noticeable improvement in student behavior, 84% of students, 80% of
parents and 83% of staff either agreed or strongly agreed that ACE program students had
improved in their behavior during the 2014-2015 school year.
Finding 5: Achievement in Promotion Improvement
Improvement in academic performance and in regular school day attendance are two
factors that contribute greatly to student promotion success. On the survey administered
in spring 88% of students, 84% of parents and 82% of staff agreed or strongly agreed that
the grades of ACE program students had improved during the 2014-2015 school year. On
that same survey 88% of students, 84% of parents and 82% of staff agreed or strongly
agreed that the attendance of ACE program students had improved during the 2014-2015
school year.
Finding 6: Achievement in Graduation Improvement (Applicable only to High School)
According to the most recent (2014-2015) Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) the
completion rate/retention rate for Katherine Anne Porter School was 98.5%.
89
C. Key Stakeholder Survey Results
In spring 2015 Katherine Anne Porter School ACE center administered surveys to students,
parents and staff members. Survey completion participants included 159 students, 50 parents and
28 staff members. The primary reason for surveying the stakeholders was to obtain their opinion
regarding the effectiveness of the 21st Century CLC program, particularly as an outcome related
to the perceived behaviors and attitudes of student participants.
Survey Response Ranges: 1 = very dissatisfied or strongly disagree to
5 = very satisfied or strongly agree
1. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of enrichment
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 2 – student; 2 - parent; 2 - staff)
2. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of academic
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 3 – student; 3 - parent; 3 - staff)
3. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that students had a positive
attitude toward the regular school day program as a result of being in the ACE program.
(Statements #: 19 – student; 19 - parent; 21 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
3 4.50 88% 2 4.43 89% 1 4.80 100%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
3 4.08 73% 2 4.25 82% 1 4.60 90%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 4.00 60% 3 3.86 57% 1 4.30 90%
90
4. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student disciplinary
behavior improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 14 – student;
14 - parent; 16 - staff)
5. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student academic
performance improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 15 –
student; 15 - parent; 17 - staff)
6. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student attendance in
the regular school day improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #:
16 – student; 16 - parent; 18 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 3.81 52% 3 3.68 47% 1 4.35 90%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
3 3.24 48% 2 3.89 61% 1 4.60 100%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
3 3.59 37% 2 3.71 50% 1 4.35 80
91
D. Evaluator Recommendations and Next Steps
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
1 In order to provide students with a varied
program of activities, this center should
ensure that at least two activities are
scheduled that focus on the area of college
and workforce readiness.
We currently have a full time staff member
working with upper classmen to prepare them for
college and workforce readiness. This staff
member works after school with students who
request his assistance. As Site Coordinator I hope
to install more for-credit, workforce readiness
oriented, after school classes during the next
school year
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
2 Staff members have unique and special
skills that go untouched. Therefore this
center should conduct a survey of staff that
seeks suggestions of academic,
enrichment, college/workforce and family
engagement activities that they or others
could offer the students in the future.
We have made definite steps forward this year
toward opening up new classes for our teachers
who have special interests. We know have a
Female Empowerment class lead by one of our
daytime teachers who has a background in the
subject matter. Next year, we hope to have more
specialized coursework, which speaks to our
student population's individualized needs.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
3 Non-certified teachers are employed in the
after school program and have roles that
require knowledge of effective
instructional strategies and disciplinary
skills. Therefore, the site coordinator
should provide staff development
opportunities for these individuals to gain
the skills needed.
We now have few/no teachers who are not
certified. We will however, continue to support
continuing education opportunities for all of our
staff.
Education Service Center, Region XIII 21st Century Community Learning Centers
Cycle 7
Rockdale Intermediate School 2015 Executive Summary
Sandy Robbins Site Coordinator
July 31, 2015
93
Executive Summary
A. General Information
The Afterschool Center on Education (ACE) is the program administered through the Texas
Education Agency for the federally funded 21st Century Community Learning Center (CCLS)
grants authorized under the Title IV, Part B of the Elementary and Secondary Act (ESEA), as
amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (NCLB; Public Law 107-110). The purpose
of ACE programs is to support the creation of community learning centers to provide academic
enrichment opportunities during non-school hours for children who attend high-poverty and low-
performing schools. A complete center report as outlined in the Texas ACE Independent
Evaluation Guide 2014-15 was prepared and has provided the information contained in this
executive summary report.
Identification of Location: Rockdale Intermediate is one of ten centers that are a part of the
Region XIII Educational Service Center Cycle 7 collaboration.
Identification of Population Served: The ACE program on the Rockdale Intermediate campus
is designed to address specific needs of students and parents in the local campus community. The
campus has a large population of at-risk and economically disadvantaged students who are in
particular need of tutorial services. Rockdale Intermediate is an Intermediate campus serving
342 students of which 213 were enrolled as ACE program participants. Of those 213 ACE
program enrollees, 133 were regular ACE program participants attending at least 30 days or
more of programing activities. A total of 101 parents were also served.
Identification of ACE Program Staff Participation:
Teacher Categories # %
Campus certified teachers 23 77%
Non campus certified teachers 0 0%
Non-certified teachers 7 23%
Total number teachers in ACE 30
94
Identification of Level of Funding:
Rockdale Intermediate
Budget Amount
Cost Per Student
6100 – Payroll $119,400 $897.74
6200 – Contracted $2,000 $15.04
6300 - Supplies $11,048 $83.07
6400 - Operational Costs $12,860 $96.69
Total Budgeted Amount: $145,308 $1,092.54
B. Summary of Findings Related to Desired Intermediate Outcomes
Finding 1: Achievement in Regular Classroom Academic Performance
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had a +0.70 gain in their
English Language Arts grades from semester one to semester two.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees had a zero gain or decrease, in their
Mathematics grades from semester one to semester two.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -1.57 decrease in their Science grades
from semester one to semester two.
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -1.29 decrease in their Social
Studies grades from semester one to semester two.
Finding 2: Achievement in State Assessment Performance (STAAR Test)
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had an 47% passing rate on
the English Language Arts STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 74% for all
students enrolled on the campus.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 20% passing rate on the Science STAAR
test as compared to a passing rate of 56% for all students enrolled on the campus.
95
Finding 3: Achievement in Attendance Improvement
Determining average daily attendance for any group of students is not an easy task nor
can the result be given too much merit. There are several factors that can impact the
calculation of average days attended by groups of students that may weigh positively or
negatively on the end result. For example, if part of a group of comparison students
enrolled on the campus in the middle of a semester, their lower number of days in
attendance would negatively impact the outcome when the group’s average attendance is
calculated. Likewise, in a situation where two semesters contain significantly different
attendance days, the semester with the greater number of days would have a greater
possibility of have a positive result when calculating an average attendance for a group of
students. In the case of this center, the average daily attendance of regular ACE program
students, decreased by -1.6 days from semester one to semester two.
Finding 4: Achievement in Behavior Improvement
With regard to noticeable improvement in student behavior, 69% of students, 68% of
parents and 52% of staff either agreed or strongly agreed that ACE program students had
improved in their behavior during the 2014-2015 school year.
Finding 5: Achievement in Promotion Improvement
Improvement in academic performance and in regular school day attendance are two
factors that contribute greatly to student promotion success. On the survey administered
in spring 70% of students, 73% of parents and 75% of staff agreed or strongly agreed that
the grades of ACE program students had improved during the 2014-2015 school year. On
that same survey 68% of students, 66% of parents and 52% of staff agreed or strongly
agreed that the attendance of ACE program students had improved during the 2014-2015
school year.
96
C. Key Stakeholder Survey Results
In spring 2015 the Rockdale Intermediate ACE center administered surveys to students, parents
and staff members. Survey completion participants included 132 students, 46 parents and 15 staff
members. The primary reason for surveying the stakeholders was to obtain their opinion
regarding the effectiveness of the 21st Century CLC program, particularly as an outcome related
to the perceived behaviors and attitudes of student participants.
Survey Response Ranges: 1 = very dissatisfied or strongly disagree to
5 = very satisfied or strongly agree
1. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of enrichment
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 2 – student; 2 - parent; 2 - staff)
2. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of academic
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 3 – student; 3 - parent; 3 - staff)
3. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that students had a positive
attitude toward the regular school day program as a result of being in the ACE program.
(Statements #: 19 – student; 19 - parent; 21 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
3 4.27 77% 1 4.24 87% 2 4.00 80%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
3 4.01 75% 1 4.37 92% 2 4.00 80%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
1 3.83 65% 2 3.78 54% 3 3.60 46%
97
4. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student disciplinary
behavior improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 14 – student;
14 - parent; 16 - staff)
5. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student academic
performance improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 15 –
student; 15 - parent; 17 - staff)
6. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student attendance in
the regular school day improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #:
16 – student; 16 - parent; 18 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
1 4.06 74% 2 3.74 57% 3 3.27 34%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
1 4.11 74% 1 3.93 74% 2 3.78 66%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
1 4.17 75% 2 3.70 50% 3 3.40 47%
98
D. Evaluator Recommendations and Next Steps
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
1 In order to maintain a high student interest
level in the ACE program, the site
coordinator should conduct a survey of
students that seeks their suggestions for
activities to be offered in the future.
Since the Spring semester is complete, within two
weeks, the site coordinator will develop and
administer a student survey of enrichment classes
that interest students for the Summer and/or the
Fall semester. The site coordinator will also
survey teachers and aids as to preferences of
enrichment activities to ensure teacher buy-in and
support.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
2 Enrichment activities can provide
experiences for students that are not
normally available during the regular
school day program. Therefore, this center
should ensure that an appropriate number
of challenging yet fun and exciting
enrichment activities are offered to
students.
The surveys, mentioned in Priority Rank 1, will
be used to supply ideas to ensure fun and exciting
enrichment classes are continually offered to the
students. The appropriate number of challenging,
yet fun and exciting, enrichment classes will be
determined as an on-going process, however
these enrichment classes should be at least more
than half of the classes offered.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
3 The summer time provides an excellent
opportunity for site coordinators to meet
community members and business leaders.
The site coordinator should meet with
these individuals during the summer time
and schedule them as guest speakers or
presenters for the ACE program.
The site coordinator will join and attend club
meetings in order to meet community members
and business leaders. She will also strive to
arrange these individuals as guest speakers or
presenters during the 2015-2016 year.
Education Service Center, Region XIII 21st Century Community Learning Centers
Cycle 7
Rockdale Junior High School 2015 Executive Summary
Leeza Perez Site Coordinator
July 31, 2015
100
Executive Summary
A. General Information
The Afterschool Center on Education (ACE) is the program administered through the Texas
Education Agency for the federally funded 21st Century Community Learning Center (CCLS)
grants authorized under the Title IV, Part B of the Elementary and Secondary Act (ESEA), as
amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (NCLB; Public Law 107-110). The purpose
of ACE programs is to support the creation of community learning centers to provide academic
enrichment opportunities during non-school hours for children who attend high-poverty and low-
performing schools. A complete center report as outlined in the Texas ACE Independent
Evaluation Guide 2014-15 was prepared and has provided the information contained in this
executive summary report.
Identification of Location: Rockdale Junior High School is one of ten centers that are a part of
the Region XIII Educational Service Center Cycle 7 collaboration.
Identification of Population Served: The ACE program on the Rockdale Junior High School
campus is designed to address specific needs of students and parents in the local campus
community. Our campus has a large population of at-risk and economically disadvantaged
students who are in need of tutorial services and homework help. Rockdale Junior High is a
junior high campus serving 353 students of which 228 were enrolled as ACE program
participants. Of those 228 ACE program enrollees, 81 were regular ACE program participants
attending at least 30 days or more of programing activities. A total of 98 parents were also
served.
Identification of ACE Program Staff Participation:
Teacher Categories # %
Campus certified teachers 15 65%
Non campus certified teachers 0 0%
Non-certified teachers 8 35%
Total number teachers in ACE 23
101
Identification of Level of Funding:
Rockdale Junior High School
Budget Amount
Cost Per Student
6100 - Payroll $115,238 $1,710.82
6200 - Contracted $2,000 $24.69
6300 - Supplies $9,250 $114.18
6400 - Operational Costs $12,000 $148.15
Total Budgeted Amount: $138,488 $407.93
B. Summary of Findings Related to Desired Intermediate Outcomes
Finding 1: Achievement in Regular Classroom Academic Performance
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -2.35 decrease in their
English Language Arts grades from semester one to semester two.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -0.44 decrease in their
Mathematics grades from semester one to semester two.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -3.04 decrease in their Science grades
from semester one to semester two.
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -2.86 decrease in their Social
Studies grades from semester one to semester two.
Finding 2: Achievement in State Assessment Performance (STAAR Test)
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 54.9% passing rate on
the English Language Arts STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 74.1% for all
students enrolled on the campus.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 100% passing rate on the
Mathematics STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 100% for all students enrolled
on the campus.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 40% passing rate on the Science STAAR
test as compared to a passing rate of 59.2% for all students enrolled on the campus.
102
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 35% passing rate on the Social
Studies STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 50.8% for all students enrolled on
the campus.
Finding 3: Achievement in Attendance Improvement
Determining average daily attendance for any group of students is not an easy task nor
can the result be given too much merit. There are several factors that can impact the
calculation of average days attended by groups of students that may weigh positively or
negatively on the end result. For example, if part of a group of comparison students
enrolled on the campus in the middle of a semester, their lower number of days in
attendance would negatively impact the outcome when the group’s average attendance is
calculated. Likewise, in a situation where two semesters contain significantly different
attendance days, the semester with the greater number of days would have a greater
possibility of have a positive result when calculating an average attendance for a group of
students. In the case of this center, the average daily attendance of regular ACE program
enrollees increased by 15.40 days from semester one to semester two.
Finding 4: Achievement in Behavior Improvement
With regard to noticeable improvement in student behavior, 26% of students, 50% of
parents and 18% of staff either agreed or strongly agreed that ACE program students had
improved in their behavior during the 2014-2015 school year.
Finding 5: Achievement in Promotion Improvement
Improvement in academic performance and in regular school day attendance are two
factors that contribute greatly to student promotion success. On the survey administered
in spring 42% of students, 63% of parents and 73% of staff agreed or strongly agreed that
the grades of ACE program students had improved during the 2014-2015 school year. On
that same survey 28% of students, 50% of parents and 27% of staff agreed or strongly
agreed that the attendance of ACE program students had improved during the 2014-2015
school year.
Finding 6: Achievement in Graduation Improvement (Applicable only to High School)
103
C. Key Stakeholder Survey Results
In spring 2015 Rockdale Junior High ACE center administered surveys to students, parents and
staff members. Survey completion participants included 43 students, 8 parents and 11 staff
members. The primary reason for surveying the stakeholders was to obtain their opinion
regarding the effectiveness of the 21st Century CLC program, particularly as an outcome related
to the perceived behaviors and attitudes of student participants.
Survey Response Ranges: 1 = very dissatisfied or strongly disagree to
5 = very satisfied or strongly agree
1. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of enrichment
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 2 – student; 2 - parent; 2 - staff)
2. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of academic
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 3 – student; 3 - parent; 3 - staff)
3. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that students had a positive
attitude toward the regular school day program as a result of being in the ACE program.
(Statements #: 19 – student; 19 - parent; 21 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
3 4.33 75% 2 4.25 75% 1 4.36 82%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
3 4.14 79% 2 3.88 76% 1 4.18 100%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
3 3.65 58% 1 4.38 76% 2 3.73 73%
104
4. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student disciplinary
behavior improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 14 – student;
14 - parent; 16 - staff)
5. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student academic
performance improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 15 –
student; 15 - parent; 17 - staff)
6. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student attendance in
the regular school day improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #:
16 – student; 16 - parent; 18 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 3.56 52% 1 4.13 63% 3 3.27 27%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 3.91 65% 3 4.13 63% 1 3.91 82%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 3.28 42% 1 4.13 63% 3 3.64 36%
105
D. Evaluator Recommendations and Next Steps
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
1 Includes a high level of fun activities for
students.
I will use student surveys and suggestions.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
2 Includes a balance of academic,
enrichment, college and workforce
readiness and family and parental support
service activities.
I will seek out community members, staff, and/or
parents that are willing to share their knowledge
about college and workforce readiness. The Site
Coordinator also intends on putting together some
valuable parent support services through local
means.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
3 After a day in the classroom by students,
students desire to be physically active after
school. The site coordinator needs to
ensure that physical activity opportunities
are provided for students and even fitness
classes for both students and parents can
be offered.
The goal is to offer students the opportunity to be
in sessions that will offer them a high level of
movement. For example, dance, fitness fun, open
gym and outdoor play.
Education Service Center, Region XIII 21st Century Community Learning Centers
Cycle 7
Texas Empowerment Academy Elementary
2015 Executive Summary
Brynette Smith Site Coordinator
July 31, 2015
107
Executive Summary
A. General Information
The Afterschool Center on Education (ACE) is the program administered through the Texas
Education Agency for the federally funded 21st Century Community Learning Center (CCLS)
grants authorized under the Title IV, Part B of the Elementary and Secondary Act (ESEA), as
amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (NCLB; Public Law 107-110). The purpose
of ACE programs is to support the creation of community learning centers to provide academic
enrichment opportunities during non-school hours for children who attend high-poverty and low-
performing schools. This report examines the outcomes of the Cycle 7 grant awarded to Texas
Empowerment Academy Elementary during the 2014-2015 school year. Listed below is a major
summary of findings. A complete center report as outlined in the Texas ACE Independent
Evaluation Guide 2014-15 was prepared and has provided the information contained in this
executive summary report.
Identification of Location: Texas Empowerment Academy Elementary is one of ten centers
that are a part of the Region XIII Educational Service Center Cycle 7 collaboration.
Identification of Population Served: The ACE program on the Texas Empowerment
Academy Elementary campus is designed to address specific needs of students and parents in the
local campus community. We have a school where over 70% of our students are economically
disadvantaged. Based on our math and reading assessment our students will benefit from the
tutoring and enrichment programs offered. Texas Empowerment Academy Elementary is an
elementary campus serving 196 students of which 196 were enrolled as ACE program
participants. Of those 196 ACE program enrollees, 175 were regular ACE program participants
attending at least 30 days or more of programing activities. A total of 171 parents were also
served.
Identification of ACE Program Staff Participation:
Teacher Categories # %
Campus certified teachers 8 53%
Non campus certified teachers 0 0%
Non-certified teachers 7 47%
Total number teachers in ACE 15
108
Identification of Level of Funding:
Texas Empowerment Academy Elementary
Budget Amount
Cost Per Student
6100 - Payroll $105,000 $600
6200 - Contracted $29,000 $165.71
6300 - Supplies $8,500 $48.57
6400 - Operational Costs $6,000 $34.29
Total Budgeted Amount: $148,500 $848.57
B. Summary of Findings Related to Desired Intermediate Outcomes
Finding 1: Achievement in Regular Classroom Academic Performance
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had a +0.16 gain in their
English Language Arts grades from semester one to semester two.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -0.79 decrease in their Mathematics
grades from semester one to semester two.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a +2.67 gain in their Science grades from
semester one to semester two.
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -4.07 decrease in their Social
Studies grades from semester one to semester two.
Finding 2: Achievement in State Assessment Performance (STAAR Test)
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 72.5% passing rate on
the English Language Arts STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 72.5% for all
students enrolled on the campus.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 100% passing rate on the
Mathematics STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 100% for all students enrolled
on the campus.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 66.7% passing rate on the Science
STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 66.7% for all students enrolled on the
campus.
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had a NA% passing rate on the Social
Studies STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of NA% for all students enrolled on
the campus.
109
Finding 3: Achievement in Attendance Improvement
Determining average daily attendance for any group of students is not an easy task nor
can the result be given too much merit. There are several factors that can impact the
calculation of average days attended by groups of students that may weigh positively or
negatively on the end result. For example, if part of a group of comparison students
enrolled on the campus in the middle of a semester, their lower number of days in
attendance would negatively impact the outcome when the group’s average attendance is
calculated. Likewise, in a situation where two semesters contain significantly different
attendance days, the semester with the greater number of days would have a greater
possibility of have a positive result when calculating an average attendance for a group of
students. In the case of this center, the average daily attendance of regular ACE program
enrollees increased by +9.95 days from semester one to semester two.
Finding 4: Achievement in Behavior Improvement
With regard to noticeable improvement in student behavior, 77% of students, 72% of
parents and 66% of staff either agreed or strongly agreed that ACE program students had
improved in their behavior during the 2014-2015 school year.
Finding 5: Achievement in Promotion Improvement
Improvement in academic performance and in regular school day attendance are two
factors that contribute greatly to student promotion success. On the survey administered
in spring 56% of students, 47% of parents and 27% of staff agreed or strongly agreed that
the grades of ACE program students had improved during the 2014-2015 school year. On
that same survey 58% of students, 47% of parents and 47% of staff agreed or strongly
agreed that the attendance of ACE program students had improved during the 2014-2015
school year.
Finding 6: Achievement in Graduation Improvement (Applicable only to High School)
110
C. Key Stakeholder Survey Results
In spring 2015 the Texas Empowerment Academy Elementary ACE center administered surveys
to students, parents and staff members. Survey completion participants included 170 students, 32
parents and 15 staff members. The primary reason for surveying the stakeholders was to obtain
their opinion regarding the effectiveness of the 21st Century CLC program, particularly as an
outcome related to the perceived behaviors and attitudes of student participants.
Survey Response Ranges: 1 = very dissatisfied or strongly disagree to
5 = very satisfied or strongly agree
1. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of enrichment
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 2 – student; 2 - parent; 2 - staff)
2. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of academic
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 3 – student; 3 - parent; 3 - staff)
3. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that students had a positive
attitude toward the regular school day program as a result of being in the ACE program.
(Statements #: 19 – student; 19 - parent; 21 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
3 4.15 75% 2 4.66 91% 1 4.60 94%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
3 4.16 74% 2 4.53 85% 1 4.53 93%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 3.93 70% 1 4.41 81% 3 4.13 67%
111
4. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student disciplinary
behavior improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 14 – student;
14 - parent; 16 - staff)
5. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student academic
performance improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 15 –
student; 15 - parent; 17 - staff)
6. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student attendance in
the regular school day improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #:
16 – student; 16 - parent; 18 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
1 4.48 77% 2 4.28 72% 3 3.93 66%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 3.98 70% 1 4.19 75% 3 3.87 60%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
1 4.02 73% 2 4.09 66% 3 4.00 54%
112
D. Evaluator Recommendations and Next Steps
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
1 Non-certified teachers are employed in the
after school program and have roles that
require knowledge of effective
instructional strategies and disciplinary
skills. Therefore, the site coordinator
should provide staff development
opportunities for these individuals to gain
the skills needed.
Site Coordinator will attend conferences and
webinars to gather tools necessary to train the
non-certified teachers. Develop a training plan to
be implemented in the next year.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
2 All students need to be academically
challenged to perform at the highest level
possible. Therefore, the site coordinator
should ensure that activities offered will
have some minimal exposure to students
performing at the synthesis and evaluation
level.
Site coordinator will review enrichment lesson
plans to make sure students are being
academically challenged. We will meet with
school day-teachers to identify student’s current
academic levels.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
3 The summer time provides an excellent
opportunity for site coordinators to meet
community members and business leaders.
The site coordinator should meet with
these individuals during the summer time
and schedule them as guest speakers or
presenters for the ACE program.
Identify possible community members and
business leaders to meet.
Education Service Center, Region XIII 21st Century Community Learning Centers
Cycle 7
Texas Empowerment Academy Middle School
Center Final Report 2015
Gioia Bufkin Site Coordinator
July 31, 2015
114
Executive Summary
A. General Information
The Afterschool Center on Education (ACE) is the program administered through the Texas
Education Agency for the federally funded 21st Century Community Learning Center (CCLS)
grants authorized under the Title IV, Part B of the Elementary and Secondary Act (ESEA), as
amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (NCLB; Public Law 107-110). The purpose
of ACE programs is to support the creation of community learning centers to provide academic
enrichment opportunities during non-school hours for children who attend high-poverty and low-
performing schools. A complete center report as outlined in the Texas ACE Independent
Evaluation Guide 2014-15 was prepared and has provided the information contained in this
executive summary report.
Identification of Location: Texas Empowerment Academy Middle School is one of ten centers
that are a part of the Region XII Educational Service Center Cycle 7 collaboration.
Identification of Population Served: The ACE program on the Texas Empowerment Academy
Middle School campus is designed to address specific needs of students and parents in the local
campus community. The campus has a large population of at-risk and economically
disadvantaged students who are in particular need of tutorial services. Over the years the campus
has consistently improved its performance in the areas of reading, math and science. Our
program is open to all of our students. Texas Empowerment Academy Middle School is a middle
school campus serving 110 students of which 110 were enrolled as ACE program participants.
Of those 110 ACE program enrollees, 105 were regular ACE program participants attending at
least 30 days or more of programing activities. A total of 91 parents were also served.
Identification of ACE Program Staff Participation:
Teacher Categories # %
Campus certified teachers 5 80%
Non campus certified teachers 0 0%
Non-certified teachers 3 20%
Total number teachers in ACE 8
115
Identification of Level of Funding:
Texas Empowerment Academy Junior High
Budget Amount
Cost Per Student
6100 - Payroll $106,000 $1,009.52
6200 - Contracted $28,000 $266.67
6300 - Supplies $8,500 $80.95
6400 - Operational Costs $6,000 $57.14
Total Budgeted Amount: $148,500 $1,414.28
B. Summary of Findings Related to Desired Intermediate Outcomes
Finding 1: Achievement in Regular Classroom Academic Performance
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had a +0.21 decrease in their
English Language Arts grades from semester one to semester two.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees had a +1.74 gain in their Mathematics
grades from semester one to semester two.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -2.45 decrease in their Science grades
from semester one to semester two.
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had a +2.40 gain in their Social Studies
grades from semester one to semester two.
Finding 2: Achievement in State Assessment Performance (STAAR Test)
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees and all students enrolled on
the campus had a 72.6% passing rate on the English Language Arts STAAR test.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees and all students enrolled on the campus
had a 100% passing rate on the Mathematics STAAR test.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees and all students enrolled on the campus had an
87.5% passing rate on the Science STAAR test.
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees and all students enrolled on the campus
had a 77.3% passing rate on the Social Studies STAAR.
116
Finding 3: Achievement in Attendance Improvement
Determining average daily attendance for any group of students is not an easy task nor
can the result be given too much merit. There are several factors that can impact the
calculation of average days attended by groups of students that may weigh positively or
negatively on the end result. For example, if part of a group of comparison students
enrolled on the campus in the middle of a semester, their lower number of days in
attendance would negatively impact the outcome when the group’s average attendance is
calculated. Likewise, in a situation where two semesters contain significantly different
attendance days, the semester with the greater number of days would have a greater
possibility of have a positive result when calculating an average attendance for a group of
students. In the case of this center, the average daily attendance of regular ACE program
enrollees increased by +1.85 days from semester one to semester two.
Finding 4: Achievement in Behavior Improvement
With regard to noticeable improvement in student behavior, 53% of students, 80% of
parents and 86% of staff either agreed or strongly agreed that ACE program students had
improved in their behavior during the 2014-2015 school year.
Finding 5: Achievement in Promotion Improvement
Improvement in academic performance and in regular school day attendance are two
factors that contribute greatly to student promotion success. On the survey administered
in spring 64% of students, 89% of parents and 100% of staff agreed or strongly agreed
that the grades of ACE program students had improved during the 2013-2014 school
year. On that same survey 23% of students, 77% of parents and 72% of staff agreed or
strongly agreed that the attendance of ACE program students had improved during the
2014-2015 school year.
Finding 6: Achievement in Graduation Improvement (Applicable only to High School)
Not applicable.
.
117
C. Key Stakeholder Survey Results
In the spring of 2015 Texas Empowerment Academy Middle School Campus center
administered surveys to students, parents and staff members. Survey completion participants
included 54 students, 27 parents and 6 staff members. The primary reason for surveying the
stakeholders was to obtain their opinion regarding the effectiveness of the 21st Century CLC
program, particularly as an outcome related to the perceived behaviors and attitudes of student
participants.
Survey Response Ranges: 1 = very dissatisfied or strongly disagree to
5 = very satisfied or strongly agree
1. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of enrichment
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 2 – student; 2 - parent; 2 - staff)
2. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of academic
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 3 – student; 3 - parent; 3 - staff)
3. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that students had a positive
attitude toward the regular school day program as a result of being in the ACE program.
(Statements #: 19 – student; 19 - parent; 21 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
3 3.74 86% 1 4.61 100% 2 4.14 86%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
3 3.70 60% 1 4.61 97% 2 4.43 86%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
3 2.87 32% 1 4.28 80% 2 3.71 71%
118
4. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student disciplinary
behavior improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 14 – student;
14 - parent; 16 - staff)
5. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student academic
performance improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 15 –
student; 15 - parent; 17 - staff)
6. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student attendance in
the regular school day improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #:
16 – student; 16 - parent; 18 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
3 3.49 53% 2 4.22 80% 1 4.29 86%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
3 3.81 64% 2 4.31 75% 2 4.43 100%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
3 3.47 53% 1 4.19 77% 3 4.00 72%
119
D. Evaluator Recommendations and Next Steps
Priority
Rank
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
1 Includes activities that help develop the
social, physical and mental needs of
children.
These needs will be addressed as follows:
Social – Through fieldtrips and guest speakers
students will be introduced to a variety of
people/environments and learn how to adapt in
different situations.
Physical – Continuing to have activities such as
flag football, volleyball, track and possibly
basketball will provide an environment where
students are moving and learning the importance
of working as a team, while experiencing a sense
of accomplishment.
Priority
Rank
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
2 Includes a balance of academic,
enrichment, college and workforce
readiness and family and parental support
service activities.
When creating the 2015-2016 schedule, efforts
will be made to enhance our ACE program with
stronger tutorial sessions, enrichment classes,
having at least 1 college engagement sessions for
each half of the year, 1 college tour during the
summer, at least 2 career speakers each half of the
year, and by having parent sessions that
incorporate our students in order to garner more
parent participation.
Education Service Center, Region XIII 21st Century Community Learning Centers
Cycle 7
Rockdale High School 2015 Executive Summary
Denice Doss Site Coordinator
July 31, 2015
121
Executive Summary
A. General Information
The Afterschool Center on Education (ACE) is the program administered through the Texas
Education Agency for the federally funded 21st Century Community Learning Center (CCLS)
grants authorized under the Title IV, Part B of the Elementary and Secondary Act (ESEA), as
amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (NCLB; Public Law 107-110). The purpose
of ACE programs is to support the creation of community learning centers to provide academic
enrichment opportunities during non-school hours for children who attend high-poverty and low-
performing schools. Rockdale High School is one of ten centers that are a part of the Region 13
Educational Service Center Cycle 7 collaboration. A complete center report as outlined in the
Texas ACE Independent Evaluation Guide 2014-15 was prepared and has provided the
information contained in this executive summary report.
Identification of Location: Rockdale High School is one of ten centers that are a part of the
Region 13 Educational Service Center Cycle 7 collaboration.
Identification of Population Served: The ACE program on the Rockdale High School campus
is designed to address specific needs of students and parents in the local campus community. The
campus has a large population of at-risk and economically disadvantaged students who are in
particular need of tutorial services. Rockdale High School is a high school campus serving 445
students of which 371 were enrolled as ACE program participants. Of those 309 ACE program
enrollees, 65 were regular ACE program participants attending at least 30 days or more of
programing activities. A total of 66 parents were also served.
Identification of ACE Program Staff Participation:
Teacher Categories # %
Campus certified teachers 15 68%
Non campus certified teachers 2 9%
Non-certified teachers 5 23%
Total number teachers in ACE 22
122
Identification of Level of Funding:
Rockdale High School
Budget Amount
Cost Per Student
6100 - Payroll $103,540 $1,592.92
6200 - Contracted $17,298 $266.12
6300 - Supplies $5,350 $82.30
6400 - Operational Costs $12,300 $189.23
Total Budgeted Amount: $138,488 $2,130.57
B. Summary of Findings Related to Desired Intermediate Outcomes
Finding 1: Achievement in Regular Classroom Academic Performance
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 2.27 gain in their
English Language Arts grades from semester one to semester two.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -3.05 decrease in their
Mathematics grades from semester one to semester two.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -0.48 decrease in their Science grades
from semester one to semester two.
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -1.64 decrease in their Social
Studies grades from semester one to semester two.
Finding 2: Achievement in State Assessment Performance (STAAR Test)
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 54.5% passing rate on
the English Language Arts STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 58.2% for all
students enrolled on the campus.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 73% passing rate on the
Mathematics STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 71% for all students enrolled
on the campus.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 71.4% passing rate on the Science
STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 79.2% for all students enrolled on the
campus.
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 100% passing rate on the Social
Studies STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 90.5% for all students enrolled on
the campus.
123
Finding 3: Achievement in Attendance Improvement
Determining average daily attendance for any group of students is not an easy task nor
can the result be given too much merit. There are several factors that can impact the
calculation of average days attended by groups of students that may weigh positively or
negatively on the end result. For example, if part of a group of comparison students
enrolled on the campus in the middle of a semester, their lower number of days in
attendance would negatively impact the outcome when the group’s average attendance is
calculated. Likewise, in a situation where two semesters contain significantly different
attendance days, the semester with the greater number of days would have a greater
possibility of have a positive result when calculating an average attendance for a group of
students. In the case of this center, the average daily attendance of regular ACE program
enrollees increased by 15.75 days from semester one to semester two.
Finding 4: Achievement in Behavior Improvement
With regard to noticeable improvement in student behavior, 68% of students, 100% of
parents and 58% of staff either agreed or strongly agreed that ACE program students had
improved in their behavior during the 2014-2015 school year.
Finding 5: Achievement in Promotion Improvement
Improvement in academic performance and in regular school day attendance are two
factors that contribute greatly to student promotion success. On the survey administered
in spring 77% of students, 91% of parents and 75% of staff agreed or strongly agreed that
the grades of ACE program students had improved during the 2014-2015 school year. On
that same survey 66% of students, 100% of parents and 58% of staff agreed or strongly
agreed that the attendance of ACE program students had improved during the 2014-2015
school year.
Finding 6: Achievement in Graduation Improvement (Applicable only to High School)
According to the most recent (2013-2014) Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) the
completion rate/retention rate for Rockdale was 95.8%.
124
C. Key Stakeholder Survey Results
In spring 2015 the Rockdale High School ACE center administered surveys to students, parents
and staff members. Survey completion participants included 369students, 68 parents and 17 staff
members. The primary reason for surveying the stakeholders was to obtain their opinion
regarding the effectiveness of the 21st Century CLC program, particularly as an outcome related
to the perceived behaviors and attitudes of student participants.
Survey Response Ranges: 1 = very dissatisfied or strongly disagree to
5 = very satisfied or strongly agree
1. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of enrichment
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 2 – student; 2 - parent; 2 - staff)
2. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of academic
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 3 – student; 3 - parent; 3 - staff)
3. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that students had a positive
attitude toward the regular school day program as a result of being in the ACE program.
(Statements #: 19 – student; 19 - parent; 21 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
2 4.11 65% 1 4.27 91% 3 4.50 90%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
3 3.70 72% 1 3.82 88% 2 4.67 87%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 4.00 63% 1 4.36 73% 3 3.42 61%
125
4. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student disciplinary
behavior improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 14 – student;
14 - parent; 16 - staff)
5. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student academic
performance improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 15 –
student; 15 - parent; 17 - staff)
6. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student attendance in
the regular school day improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #:
16 – student; 16 - parent; 18 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
1 4.00 69% 2 4.36 68% 3 3.42 52%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 4.23 70% 1 4.18 73% 3 4.00 75%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 3.97 58% 1 4.45 66% 3 3.83 52%
126
D. Evaluator Recommendations and Next Steps
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
1 In order to provide students with a
varied program of activities, this center
should ensure that at least two
activities are scheduled that focus on
the area of college and workforce
readiness.
Community members will visit twice a
month, speaking about their professions, and
explaining to students what steps it takes to
work in their respective professional fields.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
2 Staff members have unique and special
skills that go untouched. Therefore this
center should conduct a survey of staff
that seeks suggestions of academic,
enrichment, college/workforce and
family engagement activities that they
or others could offer the students in the
future.
Conduct a staff skill-survey, asking staff
members what skills they have and which
ones staff members would be interested in
using for the afterschool program.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
3 After a day in the classroom by
students, students desire to be
physically active after school. The site
coordinator needs to ensure that
physical activity opportunities are
provided for students and even fitness
classes for both students and parents
can be offered.
Part of the afterschool programming will
include physical fitness activities such as
basketball, football, and relays.
Fitness classes will be available for parents.
Education Service Center, Region XIII 21st Century Community Learning Centers
Cycle 7
Smithville Schools 2015 Executive Summary
Andra Sparks Site Coordinator
July 31, 2015
128
Executive Summary
A. General Information
The Afterschool Center on Education (ACE) is the program administered through the Texas
Education Agency for the federally funded 21st Century Community Learning Center (CCLS)
grants authorized under the Title IV, Part B of the Elementary and Secondary Act (ESEA), as
amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (NCLB; Public Law 107-110). The purpose
of ACE programs is to support the creation of community learning centers to provide academic
enrichment opportunities during non-school hours for children who attend high-poverty and low-
performing schools. Listed below is a major summary of findings. A complete center report as
outlined in the Texas ACE Independent Evaluation Guide 2014-15 was prepared and has
provided the information contained in this executive summary report.
Identification of Location: Smithville Elementary is one of ten centers that are a part of the
Region XIII Educational Service Center Cycle 7 collaboration.
Identification of Population Served: The ACE program on the Smithville Elementary campus
is designed to address specific needs of students and parents in the local campus community.
Smithville Elementary is a Title 1 district with minimal resources in the way of beyond school
hour’s programs or organizations. The elementary and junior high campuses recently came off a
brief period of academically unacceptable rating. Academics have been a major issue for years.
Smithville Elementary is an elementary campus serving 810 students of which 280 were enrolled
as ACE program participants. Of those 280 ACE program enrollees, 167 were regular ACE
program participants attending at least 30 days or more of programing activities. A total of 101
parents were also served.
Identification of ACE Program Staff Participation:
Teacher Categories # %
Campus certified teachers 14 100%
Non campus certified teachers 0 0%
Non-certified teachers 0 0%
Total number teachers in ACE 14
129
Identification of Level of Funding:
Smithville Schools
Budget Amount
Cost Per Student
6100 - Payroll $131,000 $784.43
6200 - Contracted $35,000 $209.58
6300 - Supplies $7,500 $44.91
6400 - Operational Costs $8,000 $47.90
Total Budgeted Amount: $181,500 $1,086.82
B. Summary of Findings Related to Desired Intermediate Outcomes
Finding 1: Achievement in Regular Classroom Academic Performance
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -0.61 decrease in their
English Language Arts grades from semester one to semester two.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees had a +0.56 gain in their Mathematics
grades from semester one to semester two.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -1.01 decrease in their Science grades
from semester one to semester two.
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had a -0.57 decrease in their Social
Studies grades from semester one to semester two.
Finding 2: Achievement in State Assessment Performance (STAAR Test)
English Language Arts: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 57.4% passing rate on
the English Language Arts STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 69.3% for all
students enrolled on the campus.
Mathematics: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 0% passing rate on the
Mathematics STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 0% for all students enrolled on
the campus. Math STAAR standards have not been set for 2014-2015.
Science: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 61.3% passing rate on the Science
STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 67.8% for all students enrolled on the
campus.
130
Social Studies: Regular ACE program enrollees had a 0% passing rate on the Social
Studies STAAR test as compared to a passing rate of 56.8% for all students enrolled on
the campus.
Finding 3: Achievement in Attendance Improvement
Determining average daily attendance for any group of students is not an easy task nor
can the result be given too much merit. There are several factors that can impact the
calculation of average days attended by groups of students that may weigh positively or
negatively on the end result. For example, if part of a group of comparison students
enrolled on the campus in the middle of a semester, their lower number of days in
attendance would negatively impact the outcome when the group’s average attendance is
calculated. Likewise, in a situation where two semesters contain significantly different
attendance days, the semester with the greater number of days would have a greater
possibility of have a positive result when calculating an average attendance for a group of
students. In the case of this center, the average daily attendance of regular ACE program
enrollees increased by +19.93 days from semester one to semester two.
Finding 4: Achievement in Behavior Improvement
With regard to noticeable improvement in student behavior, 58% of students, 70% of
parents and 83% of staff either agreed or strongly agreed that ACE program students had
improved in their behavior during the 2014-2015 school year.
Finding 5: Achievement in Promotion Improvement
Improvements in academic performance and in regular school day attendance are two
factors that contribute greatly to student promotion success. On the survey administered
in spring 58% of students, 58% of parents and 50% of staff agreed or strongly agreed that
the grades of ACE program students had improved during the 2013-2014 school year. On
that same survey 55% of students, 63% of parents and 17% of staff agreed or strongly
agreed that the attendance of ACE program students had improved during the 2013-2014
school year.
Finding 6: Achievement in Graduation Improvement (Applicable only to High School)
N/A
131
C. Key Stakeholder Survey Results
In spring 2015 the Smithville Elementary ACE center administered surveys to students, parents
and staff members. Survey completion participants included 79 students, 19 parents and 6 staff
members. The primary reason for surveying the stakeholders was to obtain their opinion
regarding the effectiveness of the 21st Century CLC program, particularly as an outcome related
to the perceived behaviors and attitudes of student participants.
Survey Response Ranges: 1 = very dissatisfied or strongly disagree to
5 = very satisfied or strongly agree
1. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of enrichment
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 2 – student; 2 - parent; 2 - staff)
2. The following table describes the stakeholder’s satisfaction with the variety of academic
activities offered to the students. (Statements #: 3 – student; 3 - parent; 3 - staff)
3. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that students had a positive
attitude toward the regular school day program as a result of being in the ACE program.
(Statements #: 19 – student; 19 - parent; 21 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
3 4.0 69% 1 4.58 100% 2 4.17 100%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied Order Mean Satisfied
3 3.73 53% 1 4.58 95% 2 4.33 83%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
3 3.56 52% 1 4.32 74% 2 3.83 67%
132
4. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student disciplinary
behavior improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 14 – student;
14 - parent; 16 - staff)
5. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student academic
performance improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #: 15 –
student; 15 - parent; 17 - staff)
6. The following table describes the stakeholder’s level of agreement that student attendance in
the regular school day improved as a result of being in the after school program. (Statements #:
16 – student; 16 - parent; 18 - staff)
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 3.65 58% 1 4.26 70% 3 3.67 50%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 3.65 58% 1 3.5 58% 3 3.5 50%
Students Parents Staff
Rank Rank Rank
Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree Order Mean Agree
2 3.70 55% 1 4.05 63% 3 3.17 17%
133
D. Evaluator Recommendations and Next Steps
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
1 The support of the campus administration is
critical for the success of the ACE program.
Therefore, the site coordinator should strive
to maintain and foster a strong
communication system and professional
relationship with the campus administration.
1. Make program and activity schedules
known to all administration.
2. Communicate through email and phone
calls closely with all campuses.
3. Offer help and services provided by the
ACE program, if needed, by campuses.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
2 It is important that communication between
the ACE program staff and the regular
school day staff exists. In order to be an
effective partner with the regular school day
staff, the site coordinator should ensure that
communication flows freely between the
two and that alignment exists between the
after school program and the regular school
day.
1. Tutoring pull-outs offered to regular school
staff as extra income.
2. Services and schedules made readily
available to all regular school staff and ACE
staff.
3. ACE program to participate with regular
school scheduled activities when able.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
3 The fine arts have been ignored in many
after school programs and they do not
receive the same level of support as the core
content areas in many elementary schools.
Therefore, the site coordinator should strive
to ensure that fine arts enrichment activities
are scheduled in the ACE program for
students.
1. We have an established art program and we
will continue to build new opportunities for
art.
2. We will set-up a practice area for Jr. High
band students to practice during the second
hour.
3. A BGC employee plans to offer a
gymnastics type class for second hour on
specific days.
Statement of Recommendation
Statement of Next Steps
4 New students to the campus are regularly
entering and need to know about the after
school program. Therefore, the site
coordinator should be available to meet
with these parents and students to explain
the services offered via the ACE program.
1. We will have applications readily available in
the campus offices for new students.
2. Parent orientation will be offered ASAP to
new students.
3. Sign-up for new students will be available
during regular school hours AND ACE
working hours.