Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Case of Marco
Nazzareno Galiè, M.D.
DIMES
Disclosures
• Consulting fees and research support fromActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer HealthCare, Eli Lilly and Co, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer Ltd
Clinical history
• 45 YO male
• CV risk factor: smoker (1 pack/day)
• Dyspnoea on exercise, WHO FC II
• Echocardiogram: RV dilatation
Question 1: which further investigation would you require?
1.ECG
2.PFT+DLCO and arterial blood gases
3.Chest radiograph
4.HRCT
5.All the above
Question 1: which further investigation would you require?
1.ECG
2.PFT+DLCO and arterial blood gases
3.Chest radiograph
4.HRCT
5.All the above
www.escardio.org Eur Heart J 2015, Eur Respir J, 2015
Echocardiographic probability of pulmonary hypertension insymptomatic patients with a suspicion of pulmonary hypertension according with PTRV & additional signs
6
Eur Heart J 2015, Eur Respir J, 2015
Diagnostic Algorithmfor Pulmonary Hypertension
7
Speaker
www.escardio.org
Comprehensive clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension
8
Galiè N. et al Eur Heart J 2015, Eur Respir J, 2015
Clinical history
• 45 YO male
• CV risk factor: smoker (1 pack/day)
• Dyspnoea on exercise, WHO FC II
• Echocardiogram: RV dilatation
• Local hospital admission: normal coronaryangiography > discharge
• Persisting dyspnoea, new admission in yourhospital
Clinical Evaluation
• WHO FC III
• Height: 168 cm Weight: 71 kg (BMI = 25)
• JVP < 8 cmH20
• BP = 130/80 mmHg
• HR = 94 b/min
• SaO2 = 90 % in room air
• Left parasternal systolic murmur, increased P2
• 6MWD = 479 m; B 5; Sat. 94% > 74%; HR 86 > 122 bpm
ECG/chest X-ray
Echocardiogram
- PSP = 80 mmHg
- PFO
- Congenital Heart diseases were escluded
Spirometry/arterial blood gases
FVC 85 %
FEV1 91 %
FEV1/FVC 88
FEF25% 125 %
FEF50% 149 %
FEF75% 72 %
DLCO 90 %
pH 7.46
pCO2 27
pO2 64
SatO2 93
HRTC
No parenchymal lung diseases
Question 2: which further investigation would you require?
1.Right heart catheterization
2.Right and left heart catheterization
3.CT pulmonary angiography
4.Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
5.Perfusion lung scan
Question 2: which further investigation would you require?
1.Right heart catheterization
2.Right and left heart catheterization
3.CT pulmonary angiography
4.Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
5.Perfusion lung scan
Eur Heart J 2015, Eur Respir J, 2015
Diagnostic Algorithmfor Pulmonary Hypertension
17
Speaker
Perfusion lung scan
CT Pulmonary Angiography
Moderate dilatation of the main PA (3.8 cm)
Blood tests and immunology
Immunology screening: negative
Thrombophilia screening: negative
Hepatitis serology: negative
HIV test: negative
Thyroid blood tests: normal
BMPR2: negative
Diagnosis: Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial
Hypertension
Question 3: which further investigation would you require?
1.Right heart catheterization
2.Right and left heart catheterization
3.Right heart catheterization and vasoreactivity
4.Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
5.3D-Echocardiography
Question 3: which further investigation would you require?
1.Right heart catheterization
2.Right and left heart catheterization
3.Right heart catheterization and vasoreactivity
4.Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
5.3D-Echocardiography
Treatment Algorithm for PulmonaryArterial Hypertension
23
Galiè N. et al Eur Heart J 2015, Eur Respir J, 2015
Right Heart Catheterization
Baseline NO (25 ppm)
HR (b/min) 94 86
RAP (mmHg) 5 3
PAP s/d/m (mmHg) 120/51/77 103/39/63
PAWP (mmHg) 8 7
SAP s/d/m (mmHg) 134/82/102 119/81/98
CO (L/min) 3.7 3.9
CI (L/min/m2) 2.0 2.1
PVR (UR) 18.6 14.4
SVR (UR) 26.2 24.4
SA O2 % 90 96
SP O2 % 58.7 65
Question 4: which is the furthermanagement?
1.Calcium channel blocker therapy
2.Endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) monotherapy
3.Phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) monotherapy
4.ERA + PDE-5i initial combination
5.Other
Question 4: which is the furthermanagement?
1.Calcium channel blocker therapy
2.Endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) monotherapy
3.Phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) monotherapy
4.ERA + PDE-5i initial combination
5.Other
Treatment Algorithm for PulmonaryArterial Hypertension
27
Galiè N. et al Eur Heart J 2015, Eur Respir J, 2015
Eur Heart J 2015, Eur Respir J, 2015
Risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension
28
Question 5: which is your initial therapeutic strategy?
1.Prostacyclin analogue monotherapy
2.Endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) monotherapy
3.Phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) monotherapy
4.ERA + PDE-5i initial combination
5.Other
Treatment Algorithm for PulmonaryArterial Hypertension
30
Galiè N. et al Eur Heart J 2015, Eur Respir J, 2015
‘90 ‘96 ‘00
EpoprostenolIPAH
‘01 ‘02 ‘03 ‘04 ‘05 ‘06 ‘08 ‘09
Bosentan
Terbogrel
Treprostinil
AIR
BREATHE1
ALPHABET
Beraprost
Sildenafil
BREATHE2
STRIDE1
SUPER
SERAPH
STEP
Sildenafil
STRIDE2
COMBI
BREATHE5ARIES -1/2
EARLY
PACES
PHIRST
EpoprostenolIPAH
EpoprostenolSSc
TRIUMPH
‘10
Time-course of completed RCTs in PAH (39): Therapy Strategy
VARDENAFIL
SELEXIPAG
FREEDOM C1
FREEDOM MFREEDOM C2
IMATINIB PATENT
SERAPHIN
AMBITION
IMPRESIversen
GRIPHON
COMPASS 2
‘11 ‘12 ‘13 ‘14
Modified from Galiè N, et al. Eur Heart J 2010;31(17):2080-6.
RCTs on monotherapy vs placebo or vs monotherapy (21)RCTs on monotherapy and/or sequential combination vs placebo (16)RCTs on initial combination vs monotherapy (2)
8919: PAH patients in RCTs
50/million: PAH prevalence
Current evidence from RCTs in PAH shows that…
• Monotherapy is able to reduce short-term mortality (meta-analysis) and improve long-term outcomes (SERAPHIN and GRIPHON) in incident and prevalent PAH patients
• Sequential combination therapy is able to improve short term (meta-analysis) and long-term (SERAPHIN and GRIPHON) outcomes in prevalent PAH patients
• Initial combination therapy is able to improve long-term outcomes compared with monotherapy (AMBITION) in treatment-naive incident PAH patients. Initial combination issuperior to monotherapy in head – to – head comparison
AMBITION
Galie N et al, et al. New Engl J Med 2015; 379(9):834–44.
AMBITION primary endpoint: Time to Clinical Failure(Death, Hospitalization, Disease Progression, Uns. Clin Resp)
Initial Combination vs pooled Initial Monotherapy
Ambrisentan
+ Tadalafil
Ambrisentan
or Tadalafil
Galie N et al, et al. New Engl J Med 2015; 379(9):834–44.
4/6-month results: % change comparison
AMBITION - BONSAI
Ambrisentan +
Tadalafil
(19)
Joint - INTENTION
Bosentan +
Sildenafil
(23)
BRAND – NEW
Macitentan +
Sildenafil
(12)
RAP (%) -17 - 36 - 16
mPAP (%) -33 - 21 - 29
CI (%) +56 +63 + 54
PVR (%) -61 -60 - 57
PA-SO2 (%) +17 +25 + 14
6MWD (%) +25 + 42 + 34
Question 5: which is your initial therapeutic strategy?
1.Prostacyclin analogue monotherapy
2.Endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) monotherapy
3.Phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) monotherapy
4.ERA + PDE-5i initial combination
5.Other
Haemodynamics, functional and exercise
capacity
BaselineERA + PDE-5i
6 Mo
ERA + PDE-5i
24 Mo
HR (b/min) 94 73 70
RAP (mmHg) 5 5 5
PAP s/d/m(mmHg)
120/51/77 98/29/56 98/29/45
PWP (mmHg) 8 8 8
BP s/d/m (mmHg) 134/82/102 95/61/75 100/61/75
CI (L/min/m2) 2.0 3.0 3.5
PVR (UR) 18.6 9.6 7.6
SVR (UR) 26.2 13.8 13.5
ART O2 % 90 93 94
PA O2 % 58.7 68 70
6mwd meters 479 573 630
WHO-FC 3 1 1
Key messages
• An appropriate diagnostic strategy allows to clarify the precise clinical diagnosis which iscrucial for the patient management
• In patients with pulmonary arterialhypertension the risk stratification needs to be assessed in order to establish the mostappropriate treatment strategy
• Initial combination with an ERA and a PDE-5i appears to be a suitable strategy in newlydiagnosed, intermediate risk and treatment-naive patients with pulmonary arterialhypertension