The British Guardian Paper 1924-09

8/14/2019 The British Guardian Paper 1924-09

1/16

THE BRITISH GUARDIAN. September, 1924.Th.itish Guardian.

ephon e: l i t'll lUll.sl .. n A n t . . . . , n .. . , 60, n ~ 0 1 ' l D o 8t....t . w.e. I .,London, F.llfland.8 1 ' K ) O ~ T H L or ere per ..n" tl'" (pollt f.....,j.

NOTES OF THE MONTH.ERAL PRESCOTT DEC IE'S MISTAn:E.T he Loyalty League c t the present time is cona very active C'ampaig'n in the ' Vest of England.adier-General P rescon -Dccle, speak ing at a meetat Bnth , made statemen ts which have gr eat ly dis d OUf Jew ish contempora rits. As is cus toma ryanybody openly st ates the t ruth about the Jews.l Prescon -Decie in so doin g is s ta ted by themdemented, and 10 ha ve .. Jews on the bra in."se remark !'> a re so much a mat te r of co urse to thoseknow o f the Jewish peri l nod figh t it that theybecome a jo ke 10 them, bu t they are fa r froma joke when th ei r possible ef fec t on the unend is taken into concklerauon. General Prescotte is no mo re demented than was F ield-MarshalHenry Wil son, who told our country the sameand fo e doing- which he was as sas sinated. Butug h we azree with mos t of what the General haday , and a ltho ugh we a re always morally encourby his well-known uncompromising a tt i t ude toJews, we are dlstrr-ssed to find fro m a remarkh he appears to have made in h is speech tha t evena s fallen in to the error of misguiding people onquestion of the origin and character of the det ive for ce lit work pulJing down t he Br itish Em -He is reported to have sai d th at " there was aon foo t to rui n t he British Emp ire and th e thr ee

g" fur-to rs we re the jews, t he Germans andIrish S inn Feine rs. " X ow t he Germans and t heSinn Fe iner.. are no more dominating factors inplot than are t he Con ...crvarive and Libera l Part ies,are both being used by the Jews for the desrrucof the Il ritish Empire, admitted ly not so dramati, hut cert ainly fa r more effectively th an either o ftwo agenl:"i{'" men tioned hy the Gene ra l.

ALT Y LEAG UE ' WO RK ERS .\ \ 'e cannot ment ion tilt: Loyalty League witho utsinK .o ur '{reat ... Imirat ion for the work b e i ~by Mis s A ".crs -l) oug-Ia" a nd I :'>fudge .Dougla s ha s orKlln io;cd a numbe r of speakers t othe count ry in cara ..-ans f rom vil lage to village,in g at each . ~ Aken,.Douglas herself is doin geat deal of the :.pe:lking in thi s campa ig n, and :\Ir.g-e is also speaking ex tensively, and we a re contly n"ceh'inK evidence of the good effects of thei r. :\I r. Mudge is SO deeply engrossed in this wo rkst on h is vacation that ou r readers have to suffer,we a re unable to obtain from him further instal.s of hi s splendid articles on .. P ride o f R ace , "

ANOTHER CA SE 01" ME N T A L AB ERRA.TION,There is an amusing in st an ce in the Jewish Gua,.-dian of August IlSth of the use ma de by the Jews of thesuggestion that a ny d isagreement with thei r views

can on ly be the re su lt o f mental abe rra tion, althoughin th is case they are not re ferring to one who has beenmak ing truthful st a tements about them . I t appearsthat t he son of the late Dr. Theodore Heral, who wasthe fou nder of the Zionist movement, ha s been bapt iscd a Chrivt ian and joined the Roma n CatholicCh urch. The ceremony was performed by a convertedJewish priest. Th e comment of th e Jewish Guardianreads :-

.. The genera l impression among those wbo knowhim is tha i Hans Herd has not been of normal m ind fora 10nK time. He was an official for almos t a year in theUnion Bank and then wit hou t a ny not ice suddenly disappeared . One of his si sters , too, is abnormal."T he cont inuat ion of th e paragraph is equally amus

ing, for it discloses the annoya nce of the Je-wish Guard '-an that the c us tomary deprivat ion of the conve rt ' sworldly goods ca nnot be effected ow ing to the Austrianlaw. I t con t inues :-.. Although he is 34 yea rs of age , H ans Hemis s trl l in wa rd. bu t in t he question of chang ing hisrelig ion , the Austrian law gi"'e:s him the right to decidefo r himself."T here is one more amus ing poin t towards the endof the parag raph ......here it says :-", . . He (Hans Hen l) has been for man )" rea rsunder the d o se influence of Pater Schlesinger , a cooverted Jew who has affected him with hi ' ,"ie" s on Jewishnationalism. Althoug-h a Cath olic [Rom an] Priest , PaterSch lesinger reg -ards himself still as a member of theJewish nation , and he has definite views with regard tothe part of Chr istia n Jews in Palestine. There is sometalk about Pater Sch lesinger intending to .Ira 10 Pales tin ewith Hans Herel as a demcnerration to the world of aat ional ist -Jewisb-Chrisu an movemen t. "

" EUROP EANS""Th e South African bran ch of the Jewish Kahaldcm

ha s just escaped a horrible danger . Jews havenarrowly escaped being- scheduled in th e South Africanla w as bein/.:"-t hemsl'1\"es! S ince t he Leag-ue ofNat ion s ha!! classed a ll jews as emanating- from aNat ional Home in Asia, log ic would ins ist that Jewsa re Asiatics like Hindoos. And as South Africa hasmade law s rcsteicting- the numbers and mo..-ernents of.. Asiatic.. " in the co lo ny, t he jew .. h ,1{1 a gn"at frig-htlest t he South African Government should includethem in the sched ule. But the Jew plays no gameex cept th at of " Heads I win , ta ils yo u lose . " Therefore , whilst he ha s go t Palest ine scheduled a s his.. H ome, " he ha s got himself .. recognised" in thecolony as a " European " ! And in t hese days it doesnot matte r in the least what a man is o r wha t he hasdone ; all tha t ma tte rs is what he can f,; f'1 himselJ"1'w 'gttis(J AS." As lor-g as Hraunsle in- Trotsky,Apfefbaum-Zinovit"ff, Sobelsohn-Radek an d the JewRako.."sky can g-et themselves .. recognised as Russians " ; and Lionel Phillips, Beit, Eckstein, SammyMarks, Joffe and the rest can get themselves recog.nised as .. Eu ropeans ," Jewry wins hands down.And so long as Jewry con tro ls W estm inst er and CapeTown will Jew s be able to ge t themselves " recog.n ise d " as anJth ing t hey like , and compel honest

h to do e,ery t hi ng which h ~ don ' t like.

-


2/16


3/16

THE BRITISH GUARDIAN. September. 1924.hen he described his people as .. licensed keepersine. " At llny rate , th e cult would seem to showSi r Alfred Mond is at lea st pos sessed of wha t the

[cuenals delight to call .. b rol'u]mindedness. "probability his efforts will be aimed a t prod ucingcu liar breed of pigs that ca n be g uaran teed, " a nd ea te n by the chosen nnc!'> with unru fflednce.ERrlLE 'S JEWISH MIND.

Tht Times of August 6th publ ishes a Jetter overture of Lo rd Ern ie on the subject of th e Agri.ra l \ \ ' ages Board , con tain ing the most astonishblatan t avowal of regard (or a view which is

ugh ly Juclaist ic and utterly al ien to ou r Englishthought. What is more, Lo rd ErnIe des, as tho ugh it we re a matter for pride, that thisth e vlew which determined him , as the Ministersible, to obtain powers to appoi nt the Ag riculWap es Hoard. T he pa ragrflph in t he letter:-Th e creation of a Wages Board {during the war inand it!\ centralised form were necessita ted by wars. It was nart of the Cc vemmco t po li cy 10as large a supply of supplementary ag ricultu rala ", the t"J: igendes of military service allowed. Fourred thousand men a nd women , Iarlfrly subsidised brate . some ski lled, some unskilled, wer e, as a fact,n upon the land, depriving ag rtcu llurat workers oflegitimat e opportunity of profttlnK by Ille incTeuedlo r t heir t abou r and the reduetlon in Its supp l , .hei r prerecnon a wage!! tr ibunal "as a necesa ity.. . "At th e moment we a re not concerned w ith th etion of the Agricultural \ Board , but so lelyt he reason g h'en by Lor d Emle why he, a!l!'ter respoesjble , and the Government of which hea member , ob tained the powers to appoint theBoards. He says tha, it 1Ti1S brcarue th e agri'tt'Qrkrrs 'fI'rre bri" !: drprn-"d of th rir ll!l:iti.O1'porltmit y of prQfiting by the increased demandi, labou, and the r,.duction in its J ) . Thi!l is rea lly a most remarkab le disc losure . \Veth at it a lso revea ls th e reason why Adm iralwa s unable to persuade the Min is ter of Blockd Rober t Ceci l - to take any action to stop thein thi s country from t rad ing- wit h th e enemythe Scandin avian co untries - i t would ha vede pri\' it\g" th em of their legitimate oppo rtunityinl:" by th e circumstances. I t is an ope n avowalpproval-i f not of actual participation in it-o f-olesale profitee ring which so d isgraced us in th e" e ca nn ot find tha t Lo rd ErnIe has a ny trace ofsh blood to account for this degraded view . Hears to a \Velshm an . H is fa thl:'r was a d erg-y.a nd Rector of \Vhippingham. At Oxfo rd he tookrs in Hi story and Classics. \Ve g l:'t no indicaof any possible explanation unti l we find that hey profess ion, a barrister. We are reminded of


4/16

THE BRITISH GUARDIAN.

THE PROTEUS OF PEOPLES.eptember, l

Every day that passes sees some further disclosure of the disruptive forces at work in the BritishEmpire, with the result that every day brings moreand more people into the group of those who realisethat some sinister, occult, destructive force is atwork. Every day determines more and more ofthese people to exercise themselves in opposing thisforce. Consequently, the necessity for clearly discerning the nature of this force hourly becomes moreimportant.

A review of the political activity in thecountry reveals the existence of a great many conceptions of the nature of this force in the mindsof those who are seeking to oppose it. To some itis .. Socialism: ' and they ar e " Anti-socialist":to others it is Communism . and they are .. Anti-Communist " : Itill others see it as nothing but thework of , . Secre!societies. ' There are manyother conceptions of its nature. All this is verynatural , for people react to that particular phase ofit with which they come into contact, and of which,to some extent , they have realised the danger.

But surely the time has come when thesedifferent conceptions should be correlated, and theparticular characteristics and field of each shouldbe recognised. Long ago we undertook for ourown satisfaction to do this very thing. and discovered that in all of these apparently differentsystems of ideas there existed a singular similarity.They were all the result of a particular outlook onlife j an outlook which was certainly not the resultof Christian thought. It was an outlook whichgave the supremacy to the material, and the onlyteaching which we could lind of this nature wasthe teaching of the Talmud. The was an in-teresting revelation, the value of which was utterlyunrecognised until applied. Only when we hadobtained the knowledge of what to look for did welind that at the back of each one of there systemsof ideas there was invariably the mind of the Jewsuggesting them, and almos t equally invariablyJewish minds directing them in their course. Wewere aware, of course, of the world fad that thereis a power which is the perversion of the divinepower. but that there should be a particular bodyof people who predominated in the activities of thisperverted power was startlingly new to us. \Vefound, however. that there was nothing new in thefact of their activity, and that it was not by merechance that they $0 largely predominated in theoperations of this perverted power. We discoveredthat they, were a very highly organised people

" 7

deliberately working as a body in opposing thedivine law.This discovery was like a magic guidance tothe fi tting together of the pieces in the jig-sawpuzzle of the world drama. Once in possessionof this key, all the otherwise inexplicable mysteries- the application of utterly ridiculous and absurdtheories to the practical matters of life-are explained. The Jews are revealed as the seducersof the nations to a belief in ,. ideas . , which are theperversion of the divine law, and which must in-evitably destroy them if persisted in. A study ofthe methods adopted by the Jews to thus seduceChristian peoples to work for a t i i s reveals adecree of sub tlety incredible to the uninstructedChristian mind. A Jew himself has given us thecorrect phrase with which to describe theirduplicity, or rather . , multiplicity . " Mr. IsraelZangwill. in his poem .. Israel: ' describes hisnation as the .. Proteus of Peoples," and as " wearing all colours and none. " Proteus, in the oldmythology, is described by Homer as having hadMenelaus in his powe r only so lon g as Menelauswas unable to. grasp him in his true shape. Solong as Proteu was able to change his form intoany shape he desired, Menelaus had no power overhim. And this is exactly the situation in whichthe Christian nations find themselves with regardto Jewry.JEWRY IS THE PROTEUS OF PEOPLES.

We assert, therefore, that all these apparentlydiffering systems of ideas have but one origin andone purpose. Th ey originated in the mind ofJewry and are designed 10 destroy those who are50 misguided as to give any credence to them. Thisbeing 50, it follows that there is but one name togive to the destructive agency which the E r:glishpeople have to oppose, and that name is Jewry.Jewry and Judaism are one and the same thing.To think of it as being .. Socialism, " or Cerernun ism;' or Bolshevism," or " Subversivism;"or any other .. ism" than " Judaism : ' issimply to render ourselves impotent from the beginning. . For let us be thoroughly successful inremoving any of these isms . , from the minds ofmen, we must make no mistake about it, so long 1 . Jewry is left to disguise its activities under ; ysuitable ism," so long will Jewry produce just asmany more .. isms " as can be removed , andprobably of a far mont dangerous character.


5/16

a THE BRITISH GUARDIAN.THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY.

B y A R " I ! P O S D ~ N

September", ' : ' : ; ' : - - - - - -

The ar t icle which appea red in the J une number ofBritish GuardiOll on th e British Fascist! dealt witho rs which concern every pat I iotic or political body.method th erein desc ribed of the penetration and

of a body wo rk in g in the national interest bywho ar c in rea lity seeking to destroy th e na tionprobably been effected to a greater ex tent in the

at ive Par tv than in anv other bodv. T hiswas the naturdl champion of all the sound, sane,tive elemen ts in th e coururv. I t is inconceiv

tha t , had th ere no t been some" s ubtle influence at, the type o f Engl ishman it embod ies should havewo rthilv demon stra ted his abilitv in almostpar t ' of the world and yet ha ve' made such a

poor show ing" in the mannccmeut of his ownstic affairs. The common taunt that the personnele Conservat ive Par ty has never been renowned fO I"intelligence is no t the honest ex press ion of an obtruth . I t is easily recognisable by t hose ha vingknowledge of j ewry as the work of that part iculare. In fact it is an instance of a method whichbecome so well known to t he ant i-jud ai st t ha t itbee n classified by h im unde r the t itle of .. The

spc r Drive." Having" had some years experiencehe Con servative Party and its managers it is notcult for me to apprec ia te t he nat ure of the subtlewhi ch sterilised it . The influence is the samehat refer red to in th e Bri tish Fasc ist i a rticle, anenee which long aKo succeed ed in its work and isfirmly establi shed in control. Many of the A K e n t ~he Com .tituencies arc Jews . 'IIlU the deliberat e misag-ement and d issipat ion of the valuable volun tarystance offered in t1lO"e Con-a imeecie-, during theElect ion \\."as on a yery la rge scale. Un fortunatelycand ida tes in those Constituencie-s. where they a rehonest Eoglisbmen, a rc so ut terly ignorant of theand his methods t hat the idea of such a thingning- ne ve r occu rs to them. Mo reover, these

A g e n t ~ a re usually so plausible and cover theirpurpose under such .1 volume of sound" ta lk"the candidate is almost inva rjnhly g ulled into thethat he has been extremely fortunate in havinga ssi stance of such an excellent Ag"ent. These

...h Ag(>Jtt s have been appoint ed a t the instance ofCentral Office , which is almost entirely staffed b) 's. An amu sing st ory is told in th is connection-ay wh ich I believe to be tr ue-of a visit paid byad ier.General l 'rescott-Decie to t he Cen tral O ffice .entering th e Enquiry O ffice it is sa id th at he wasached by a palpab le Je\\ anti asked to expfain h i.,css. T he (Ieneraf looking- at the man in a wayma de him Ieel decid edly uncomfortable, sa id,never tell my bus iness to a Jew. Here is my card"ou will go and find an Eng'lishman fo r me to talkwill expla in my business to him." I do not knowher- tln- Gen,-ral wa s successful in finding- a nl i"hman to talk to" I rather doub t it. I imagineIishmen arc s (lillicult t o find ill the Central Officee proverb!a1 needle in th e bottle of hay. Howevermay be. ce rtain it is t hat at th e las t election itS ir Herbert J essd - no\l' Lord jesse! of \ ' e s t ~:stc r ( !}---who sut on t he I'arty ches t and decidedshould rcreive fiuuncial :support and who shouldCertain it is lso that th e new Par ty .\l lmager ,is the product of one o f the largest Jewish

T ru st s in the cou ntry. And again, cer ta in it is that itwas the influence of :-'Ir. Leopold Amery which pe rsuaded Mr. Baldwin some months ago to rashly appealto the countr;,. I see tha t the disclosures in t he las tnu mbe r of Th e British Guar dian of the influencesbroug ht to bea r on the coun try for the defeat of theConservat ive Party ha ve not passed unno ticed, a nywayby the leade r-writer in T he Pa triot of August 2lst , forhe says :-

.. The policy wit b wh ich Mr, Baldw in rashly went to.. the count r y a nd the results of the Election require ex.. ptenauoe which has Do t been Ior theoming. Dark.. Iorces were brought to bur to wreck the Censer" vative majority, and run es from foreign sources were.. made av ailable."Th is is pe rfectly t rue, of course, bu t I am sorry

10 find The Patriol maki ng th e statement w ithoutasserting a t the same time t hat Mr. Baldwin didnot h ing to render him self unworthy or unsuitable tocontinue as Leader of the Party. There is the mostlively necessity a t the present time for those who haveany hope in the Con servative Party to support Mr.Baldwin in his position. The Jews a lways have morethan one re ason for doing anything. Mr. Baldwin isan honest, patriot ic Englishman; a character uniquein modern political life. He has made speeches of sonoble a character, and has advocated poli t ical actionwith reg-ard to trusts and monopolists, both (If whichhave been most unpleasing to the J ews. Havingmanipulated h im. quite unconsciously. into the fool ishaction of resigning and th e Elect ion . they a re nowus ing h is mi5take with its resultant defeat in th e moststrenuous efforts to bring about his deposit ion asLeader of the Pa rty. That section of the penny pre sswhich is supposed to be Conservat ive in .. policy," yethelped 50 materially to bring about the Conservativedefeat , is now working overtime in an endeavou r tobring about Mr. Ba ldwin's downfall . The tr oub le theyha ve wit h him is th at althoug h (throug h ignorance , Iam sure) he is not hostile to J ews, yet he is host ile totheir methods-whe ther used by Jew or Gentile-andis also no t directly manageable. This latter is fo rthree rea sons. They ca nnot cont ro l him by blackmail ;they ca nnot coerce him financially ; and th ey have foundit impossible to hook on to him a Jewish Private Secre,ta l'), ~ r Baldw in' s continued Leade rship of the Con .servative Par ty is the one hope t hat Party ha s got ofever being of an y t rue serv ice to the count ry. He mavno t have the .. first class bra ins " of scme-c-they h a v ~been t ried and we know bu t too well whi th er they leadus-but what he ha s got is ho nesty. And th is is thevcry thing the country is in a terrible danger throughthe lack of in tho.;,e who ha ve fo rmed it.. ..ucce....iveGovernments. Fo r my part , I am sorry to say that Ido no t believe there to be any hope for the country inthe Conservative Part)'. even with 1'..[ r-, Baldwin as it sLf'ader, and even \\'ith him f'nlightened to the tr uecause of all t be t rouble. The Jewish g rip on the Par t "is a ,.lflint,;Jeohold, and were )Ir. Baldwin to lake anyline \ ' o ~ i c h would be likely to result in allJ thing t ru i}:beneficial to the country, they would thrott le it todeath. I am convinced th at ou r on ly hope is for those

n l Conservat ives who ha \ e the courage and theab ility to seize the power and admin is ter the govern .ment to do so.


6/16

September. 19 2 ,," , THE BRITISH GUARDIANr'- - - - - - - - - " 9

RUDYARD KIPLING'S SPEECH OF MAY 1914.[The recent case in whk-h the Edit or of the Communisrio paper, The WQrkers' Wakl)' . was dischargedagainst a summons for inci ting His Maje sty ' s soldiers

and sa ilors to mutiny sh ould su rely have revealed tot he people of this count ry the da ng erous situation theyha ve placed themselves in by handing over the adm inistration to a Government some of the members 01which have them selves, at different times , commi ttedsim ila r offen ces. \Ve are reminded of that inspiredspeech of Rudyard Kipl ing ' s at T unbridge Wells inMay, 1914" when we were on the verge of civi l warover Irela nd, a s ituation which we seem to be rapidlyapproaching once more. This speech was of so rema rkab le a cha racter that it will undoubtedly remain forall t ime classical indictment of poli tical corruption.It is as appos ite to-dn y as it was in :\l ilY, 191! , andwould be so well wo rt h re-rf


7/16

0 T H E BRITISH GUARDIAN, September f2 '! 4- -So the Ir ish Na tion alist vote was bough t by mea nshe Home Ru le Bill. One thing led to anothe r tillCabinet found themselves in art awkwa rd position.Home Rule Bill, as the)' thought, was the easiestout of it. Up till that time the Cabine t 's l e ~ i s l ahad been nothillJ::' more than corrupt or recklessThe pas ..inl: of t he Parliament Act had,', rh...t royed tbe Constitution of tbis country',the law of the lan d had been made to fit the needs

the CHhint"t. Our rollntry had been open ly de.in the eyt"S of oil na tions who \'al ur the pu r ityhei r jus tice or the personal honou r of t heir ad miniss . But so far that had br-cn all. Ti ll th r- Homenm wns produced the Cnblnor had done not hingFatally and irretrievably compromised the un ity; r ('01t Bri tain o r the sa fety o f the Empire, or madetem-e unendu r-able to a ny t sect ion of t he K ing-'sects.The Home Rule Bill broke the pledg ed Ial th o fns; it o fficia lly rttOf{nizcd sedi tion , privy con and rehellion; it l'ouhsidizf'd the secre t forces 01

intimidation, ou t rage and murder ; and itted an independen t strong-hold in which all thesecould work together, ;I S t he)' have always andly boasted that the)' would , for t he destruct ion oft Britain.Unde rs ta nd g-entlcmf'n, tha t I do no t for one int hlame the Nationalist s. T hr-y nrc wha t theyareat their particula r t)PC of th eir race 11:Is alway s,Silll'C till' beg-innin g- of recorded history. T he)' hav enot hing-, and , so far :IS in t hem lies, they havenot hing: to he done for the peace or the materia!nn'ment of th t'ir land. Thl.Y have imposed their ownfo rm of tr ibal administration on largt' tracts or-c-the despotism of secret societies , a go\'ern.o f denunc iation by day and terro rism h) ' i ~ h t .can see the fruits of their work wit hin a few hourswe stand if vou choose to visit the cities Ofcountry-sides that' they con trol by th('ir peculiarhods---by the only methods they have ever underc- hy t he me thods of Iear, oppression, and hate.do t hem justice, they hnve never faltered in theiriona te and per sistent hatred of Eng-land. T heyp rt';wltt'd it and p-ectlsed it by eyer)' means ir,power. They have pr ayed for the success 0 1illl\c1' s enemies in every quarter of th e world ; they

H .. .. io;h' (l those enemies with men and arms ; th vyi':t' red a \ Eng- land 's defeut s : they have befouledhonour of England ' s army, and t he)' have mockeddead,I t Wdl a province of Mexico tothe Unit('d S a t 'V e have no rig-h i to bel ieve tha tof our own country. For wha t a re the reasons tha than' (,1I11('d us here to -day ?A province and a peop le o f Gr ea t Brita in a re to be50111 tn th eir and our enemies. We a re forbidden 10han :111)' voice in t his sa le of our own Ilesh and blood;we have no tribunal under heaven to appeal to exceptthe corrupt p arties to tha t sa le and their pa id followers,

And what has happened within the last two months ?One thing led to another till the Cabinet fou nd them~ 1 \ ' C s in !'uch :1 position that they had 10 pu t someone out of the wa), to ge l st raight aKain. So th r ,proposed to put Ulster out of t he way, \ \ ' ith this cbjcet the)' secretly p repared the la rgest combined expedition of hoth arms that has been launched since theCrimea-a force of ho rse, foot, field guns, howitze rs ,ba ttleships, cru isers and destroyers . I f these UlsterI.'attlc could not be sold on t he hoof they should bedelivered li S ca rcasses. Th en t hey made a slip. Itt akes nerve to organi7.t" such a cattle k illing' en a largescnle. Tht'Y g-in'e the office rs told off for the businesstheir dloiee -w he ther the)' woul d first provoke collisionwith , and then loose death a nd destruct ion on, the oneloyal, the one prosperous , the one law-ab id ing' po rtionof Ireland at the orde r of a secret Cabinet commi ttee,or whe ther they would face the rui n of thei r caree rsofficers in his [ a j e s t ) ' s a rmy ,

The cho ice was no t so easy as it sounds, For ,remembe..r, that though the Cons ti tution had cea sed toex-ist; though the men who were planning t hese i n,famies had put al l methods of civilized government behind them ; ye t the old t ra ppmgs o f co nstitu tionalism ,the old forms of conven tions of civilized go\'crnmcn tsti ll exis ted. They were a valuable asset to theCabinet, Thev we re t he cloak under which the con .spirators coui(l operate, under whi ch they couldth reaten. Th ese men who met to a rrange the massacreof decen t citizens ; the se men who would bombard anopen town of loyal subjects sooner t han risk the los so f th irteen g uineas a day whi le they ask the electors~ Ie :w e to kill j t hese outlaws were st ill his Majesty 'sMinisters , power fu l heads o f great Depa rtmen ts ofState. Tht'y could mak e or break the ca ree rs ofhonourable men. They elected to forfeit th eir paJ andp o s ~ t ~ o n rath:r a do , this . ~ r to S-a\-e th e pay andpoSition of hiS Majes ty s Mm ls ters. By their choice-to t ~ eternal honour and g ! ~ be it recorded - theArmy .a \'ed the Empirt'.

W h:,a t ha s hap pened since ? The Cabi ne t a nd theHouse o f Commons ha\'e d rawn eig ht weeks ' moresalary. I f the Cabind do no t go forward with theHome Rule Bill they will cealie to d raw any salary',The refore , they mus t go fo rward with th e Home RuleBill. W e know, all mankind knows they d id no tshri nk from attempted murdf'r to o \ ' e ~ m e beforehandthe oppos ition which the)' were warned the Home Rul eAct would meet. Through no fau lt of the Cabinet th :,ata lfempt failed, But don ' t be unde r any delu sion . Dono t be tkt t ived by any talk of a rrangements or accom-


8/16

..u _ . . . . H ..think,. I murdt-T Wt wnT t.ht Cabion 50t b ~ "in attempt it again. . \nd t ~ il i go fun hcr.In th e li"h t of t hei r record tw o mon th s ago, we an 'jtlst ifit:d ill helicying- that. j f by an} l ie, by any Ialsification of fac ts , speeches, documents or telegrams, byany b ribe of mone:r . title or promotion, by subornationof evidence or pre-a rran ged provoca t ion, th e b lame 01ca us ing bloods hed can he laid topDn Ulster, the Cabinetwill, openly or secretly, lend it sel f to th at work.

Ulster, an d as much of Ireland :. '" dares to ex pressit se lf , wis hes to remain within the Union and und erthe Flag of the Uniou, The Cabinet , for reasonswh ich I ha ve &f\"cn. intend to drive th em out. Theerectors of Great Bnta in h ale n en 'r sanctioned tbi ..Ulste r has made every sacriftce, save Doe , to makeeffec tive her intention to remain in the Un ion. Shestands ready to make t he las t sacrifice. H ow do t t l ts tand in thi s ma tt e r ? Our forefathers , who were nost ra ng ers to ty ranny, would ha ve se t their hou se inorder IOIlg' ere t his, ou t we, who encounter it for thefirs t t ime in ge nera tions, are slow to rea lize that civilwar is possible . . For civ il war is possible. Civil waris inev itable unless our rulers can be b roug ht to rea lizethat , even now, they mus t submit t hese grave mat tersto the ju dgmen t of It free people . I f they do not , allthe history of ou r land !'>hows that there is bu t one endc-destruction from within or wit hout.

THE HOUSE OF JEWS.B y PA Rl lA. .El OTARI.....x,

A co rrespondent ha s recently cas t doubts on theexistence of a racially a lien Jewish Parliament in thiscountry. \Ve therefore th ink it well to quote from thereport of the la st sess ion of t h Parliamen t in theJElllish Ch.,onitlt oi August 1st. And, to begin with,a list of the names of those present and t c ! > t eocles they rep resent will be found to be high ly Illumina tin g- the ang l ified names not the lea st . H ere isthe opening of the report :-

A meeting of the Deputies _as held on Sunday at theOld County Hal l, Spring Gardens. Mr. H. S. Q.Henriques, K.C (Welit Loedce], the Presid ent 1 fU in thechair. T here were alao present :Lord Rc thechlld (Manchester, Greatl .Sir S. Inetcne (C .rdif f New).Rabbi Dr. S. Daicbes (Leed s Beth Hamedrashl.Dr. G. Chaikin (Sandy's Row).Dr. M. Epstein' lUnited Syna goguel . .Dr. D. Jochelman {Woolwich and Plumeteadl .Dr. J . Klein (Hambro).Dr . M. Mailds (U anelly)Lieu t.-Col. C. \Valey Cohen (Central ).Capt. I. Fredman (Exeter).Mrs. A. Model tUni01l of Jewish Womenl .

r M. A.. Spielman (Union of Jewish Women) .Messrs. D. Bameu (Totienbam}..0\.. I. Belish.a (West Loodon) .L. Benjamin (South Shields).S. Binderman (Order-Achei Brj th and Shield of Abraham).P. Burns IWolverha.Plpton).M. Cash (Association of Inish F rie.odly Societies].J .. Castello (Spanish and Portuguese).H. B. Co t.l.en (Borough).H. D. Cohen (Brisbane).

, """'" ",;;;.;;:;;;:;;M H Dans CanDOD. Street RoadG Delpdo Span ish and Por. u.gue "I. De)ong ,Phllpot Sueeu.J. H. i::lkes (Belfast },I Feldman ISpitaHields, Great) .B. A. Fe rsht (Darlington).M. 1. F'loremin (Manc hester, Span ish and Portu guese).D. Franks [Walrhamstcw and Leyton) .A. Gaber (Old Castle Street].E. Goldman IGrand Order of Is rael).1. Goldman (St. John 's Wood ).S. W. Goldman (G rea t Garden Srreet].O. E. d'Avigdor Gpldsmid (AngloJewish Associationl.P. GuedaHa iSunderland).S. E. de Haas (Christchurch. N.Z.) .L. ). Hrdleman (Ealing and Acton)..-\. In stcne {Pcntyprfdd} ,E. Iua


9/16- ,

AlIr"OR , J..... i il i.:' E 1 t ; ~ l ' i in EJi1 " f


10/16

September, 192+- FIE

THE INFAMOUS RUSSIAN "1 REATY.England is piling up for he rself much expiatory

tribulation in the fu ture, but t he weight of it has beenadded to many thousandfold by t he recen t recognit ionof the Jew tyranny governing Ru ssia, an d th e pactmade with it by the British Government. It is -an Inevi tab le law of life tha t whatsoever a man sows tha tsha ll he also reap. And the same l aw appl ies equal lyto na t ions. Only by terrible suffering will the Brltlshpeople expiate the iniquity which has been perpetratedin their name. There would seem to be some justifi cation for the cha rge of hypocrisy so frequent lybrought aga inst us, for the count ry cannot but knowfull well t he J ewish anti-Chris ti an character of thepresent Government (as we su ppose it must be called)o f Ru ssia.

Our people must know of the de liberate a t tackon the Christ ian religion made by these Jewish " bloodyballoons " - a s they have been called-no t only inRussia hut in all the Christ ian countr ies of the world jof th e munler of the head of the Orthodox Ch ristianChurch in Russ ia with his whole family, and of manythousands of th e pr iests of that church, in mos t instances wi th diabol ical crue lty. Our people mu st als oknow of the blasphemou s travesties of the most sacredep isodes in the life of Christ and in the life of theVirgin Mary, delibe ra tely portrayed by th e Jewish Bolshevik Govemment-c-travesties in some respects so obscene as to be indesc ribable. Also it cannot be for gotten how these bloody-handed Jews attempted topr even t th e mar tyrisation of those Ch ristian saints whosuffered death at thei r hands by chopping thei r corpsesinto small p i t " t t ~ and ~ i v i n K th e 11 h co the ~ t n ' i n g 'people to ea t , or ft'eding beast s with it , th e idea bcinf:'that it would be impossible to consider anybody as asa in t or a martyr- whose body had been ea ten by hisfellow being-s. Yet these are the people whom theBritish ClQvernm


11/16

P 0;.-- OUR EFFORT TO BEAT ~ 1 D:

ELECTORS IYou have the choice of 3 Candidates.

SIR ALFRED STEPHENS.REV. E. T. OWEN.

A Welshman.A Welshman.

SIR ALFRED MONO. Whom the Jews saycannot be a Welshman.

If you believe what lite Jews s.y of themselves you will vole for eitherSTEPHENS or OWEN.

Before casting your 'vote for Mond read what the Jews say 01 themselves :

"The patriotism of the Jew is simply a cloak he assumes to please theEnglishman. jews who pretend that they can at once be patriotic Englishmen andgood Jews arc Simply Living Lies."-B . Felz. A letter entitled ., Can Jews bePatriots:' Jewish Chronicle Deeember Sth, 1911. p. 38... Let as take the mask off. Let us play the Lion cl Judah lora change. Away,away with false patriotisms. A Jew can only recognise one fatherland-Palestine,"M. J.Wodi,lawoki. Jewish W orld. Jan. lot. 1909... . . We are. whether born here or naturalised here, not really British at all.We are National ' jews-Jews by .Race I and faith- and not Englishmen."" Zioniot " in the Sunday Chronicle, Manchester. p. 4. Sept. 26th. 1915.


12/16

Before cosling your Vole for Mond read who! the Jews soy of themselvesA Jewish writer in the J ewish Chronicle for September 22nd, 1922, has at last

admitte d what the Lloyd George Governmen t knew in 1917 and the ' Morning Po st 'published in 1918 i.e., that the Bolshevist officials of Russia are Jews. The RussianRevolution with a ll its ghastly horrors was a Jewish movement, initiated by Jewswith th e assent and connivance of th e H eadquarte rs StaH of the G erman Army... There is much in the fac t of Bolshevism itself, in the (ac t that so many Jews a reBolshevists, in the fact tha t the idea ls of Bolshevism at man y points a re consonantwith the finest ideals of Judaism : '-]ew ish Chronicle, Apri l 4th. 1919... Jewish Nationalism is a Jew ish question which mus t be governed by Jewish

principles and not be made subse rv ien t to the convenience or exigencies (tha t is, thenecessities or d an gers) for the time being of any Government, however importan t.A s a peopl e, we jews have not been at war between ourselves, the jews in Englandagainst the j ews in Ge rmany, or the j ews in France against the j ews in A ustria: and10 sectionalise j ewry in obedience to international differences seems to us to giveway the whole prin cip le of j ew ish nationalism ."- J etf'isll n'MId . Jan . 15th , 1919,p. 6. (T he inserted b rackets are ours .)

This latter statement is surely ex plicit enough and perfectly frank. It should bea warning 10 every civilised country which harbours j ews or allows them to obtainposit ions of influence i" its Councils of State. It means that whateve r the crisis o rdanger of any nation, if its removal conflicts with the interests of j ewry. then the jewswithi n the na tion affected may be disloyal to that coun try. and may either stand id lyb y while it is destroyed or take a secre t pa rt in its destruction . 1n other words,when it suits the policy or convenience of jewry, ow country may be betrayed by it,just as in the past, ot her countries, bo th an cient and mod ern, have be en betrayed.

Do 'we need a clearer warning of the pa rt whi ch j ewry may play?Faced as we arc , with this possible jewish menac e, proclaimed not by us, but,

as the extracts above show , by j ews themselves the safety of ou r country demandstha t our H ouse of Commons and House of Lords shall be composed wholly of menof 806sh blood .At all P arliamentary and Municipal Elect ions a rrange that only men ofnative blood and ra ce are nominated as candidates.

We must work notour country

onlyand

forour

ourselveschildren.

but for

JOIN THE BRITONS.Write to the Secretary for application fonn.40, Great Ormond Street, London. W:C I.


13/16

MRS. WEBSTER'S BOOK.\Ve were not favoured with a complimenta ry copyr \Vebst er's book, S ecret Societies and Sub't'f'r.u oveme'lts, with the con sequence t hat we haveo wait for some cons iderable t ime before the kindo f a friend gn ve us t he opportunity o f reading it.an ...ell ..mders tand that a bo ok sell in g" at t we ntya copy cannot be sent out g ra t is w ithout theca reful t hou ght a s to the prospective val ue orft , and we can also understand how th is coml consideration, which necessarily entered intoer when the value of t he wo rk was fn:.W at thee men tioned. deprived us of receiving a considerawh ich we migh t otherwise have enjoyed - a nyhow ,ke to t hink tha t it wa s tha i. In an y case wehave been perfectly candid in our criticism ofork.

\Ve have no t had the t ime to prep are a fu ll c riti fcr t his number, nor would the space a t our disl have sufficed. This we hope to el ve in fut ur ebe rs. For although t here is m uch for us to con,Mrs . Webster upon, t here is , in our opinion,runniog t hrough the whole book which , if

es not en tirely neutralise, from a pro pa g anda pointw, th e enorm ous amount of good work do ne, ce r ro bs it o f a J,:"reat dea l of it s efficacy. Mrs.er may say t ha t the book is not w ritten asa g anda , th at it is an histor ical study pure andle . Bu t to th at we could not agree. Conclusions

rawn a nd asser ted much tOO forcibly from i nadep rem ise s wh ich ce rt ainly consti t ute propaganda.ny case , al l mode rn his torical works a re propa I t is for th at very rea so n we find ourse lve sd- fo r we would have much preferred to ha veable to have offered noth ing bu t th e mos t lau da

compliments- to men t ion th is defi c iency , becausenece ss ity for prompting th e subconscious mindsr rea ders to question suggest ions wh ich will unhave sunk into th em . Howeve r, as we haveth is we must leave COr future is sues , for we havewith d istin ctions which are so fine that thev

ery difficu lt to fo rmula te and ex plain. \Vhat w to men t ion here is the very high e xcellence of

chapter , Th e R eal ]euj$h Pe,il, an d the Con .fl. This would make a mos t effect ive pamph let .The a nswer g iven to t he ques t io n , fre quently proas Mrs. \ Veb ste r rightly states , .. How canbelieve th at j ews advoca te Socialism , since t hey

to lose everything- by it ?" is ind eed splendid.ourselves have had it in mind to a ttempt anr to th is ve ry quest ion for a long time, bu t wenot hee n giveu t he g uidance which ~ I r s . Webs terobviously received on t his matter. A fte r showingth e j ewish ca pita lis t meet s with indulgence athands of our socia list Intellec t ua ls who, whilst in hing ag ains t Britis h owne rs of property neverde j ewish millionaires in thei r diatribes , " andhow t he Jew s cla imed t he Labou r Pa rt y in the lastt ion as peculiarly t h i ow n, ye t pride themselves

ri ches o f some o f thei r fellow t ribesmen , so thatwou ld s eem t hat in t he eye s o f Jewry al l capitalistsno t to be regarded a s mon sters who sh ould bey expropr ia ted , " Mrs . \Vebs ter goe s on to-" But in conaidertn g- the war on Cap italism it isto bear in mind tha t capital ists are of two kin ds :

speculation. Whilst to the former , soc ia l unres tprove fa tal . to the latter any d isturbances a ~ provideoppor tunities for profit, As M. Georges Batault ha s wellexpressed it : From the sr rrcrlv finanCI al point of view , themost disastrous evemsct histo ry, wars or revolutions,never rep resent ca tasl rophes ; the manipulators ofmoney and the wary bu si ness men can make profitout of everythin g- , provided they know beforehand andare well-informed . . . It is cer ta in tha t t he j e .... sd ispers ed over all the su rface of the earth .a re par t icularly favou rably si t uated in t h ~ s r.espe(:t.I t is s illllifican t to notice tbar the capitalists mostattacked by the Soci alists a nd Pacifists a re not tho se whomake profit out of wars Cl od revolutions , but thos e \\:hocontribute to the prosper ity of the count ry and provid..work for million s of people . Here. then, th e je ws and.the Socialists seem to find a point of agreement . I t iseviden t a t any rate, that ma ny rich Jews consider thatthey bi,"e nothing to fear from the th reatened Cap italLevy and other mea sures of expro ll ria t io r.. Are we notirresistibly reminded of th,: passag e .in the . Prctcccl s-s.... here inciden tall y th e Capital I.e\") IS speCI fically m en tioned- ' Outs t hey will not touch , because th e momentof attack will be kn own to us and \ \'1' sha ll take measuresto p rotec t our own .?Dnt let us con sid er furt her how the Soc ialist plan for, th e arionalisanoa of a ll the means of production. distr ibut ion. an d f'xch'ang e ' m igh t be reconciled even ..-itbth e in te re sts of Jewish indust rial Capitalists. The mo rewe examine thi s magic formula whic h is to transform theworld in to a Paradise for th e workers, the more we shallsee that it approximates 10 the svs tem of Super-Capitalism.of which. as Werner So rnbart ha s shown , the jews wer eth e pri ncipal inaugurators. Social ist s a re fond ot explain ing that ' Capitalism ' beg,an with the introduction ofsteam ; in reality. of co urse. Ca pitalism. in the sense ofwealth accumulated in pr ivate hand s, bas a lways existedsi nce thc first sal'age made his sto re of ..... inte r food .What Socia list s rl'a ll), mean by Capita lism is the mod ernsystem of Indus triafisrn, which rends 10 concen tra te allthe mean s of production and dist r ibut ion in the han ds ofind ividuals or grnu!>s, who, if they happen to be unsc rupulous, a re able by syst ematic swea ting of the workerand bleeding of the consumer to con duct ope rat ions onso la rge a scale as to crush all competition by the homeworke r or the sm all tradesman ,Obviously , however , with t he growin,ll" demand of thework er s for be tter con ditions of life and th e increaaingsupport len t to them br enlig-ht ened public opinion. thispos stbilitv cannot continue indefinitely, and unless itviolent convulaion tak es place the t ime will come ....-hengreat indus trial ma jll1 afes will ha ve to con ten t themselves\ \ ' i t modera te profit s 0 11 their outlay. Th us althOU .ll"h attirst sigh t it may appear that the Super-Ca pi ta lis ts mu stdesi re to maintain the cxisting- order of th ings , if he is fa rseeing he must reali se th at pr ofiteering under pres ent con d itions must soo n cease.I t is therefore conceivable tha t ellen th e Jewish Industri a l Capitalist may see in the na t ionalis at ion of indust rya preferable alternati ve to the limitation of prufits underurivat e en ter pr ise. Th e same financial acumen an d skillin man agement which has enabled him to control ri ag sand trus ts in the past ,,"oullt ensure him a pla ce a t thehead of nationalised ind ustr ies, whirh in eff ec t woul d benothin g- but ll'igantic tr usts nominally unde r Slat e con trol,but really, like a ll State enterprises , in th e ha nds of a fewmen. Under Socialism the posi tion of these trusts wouldlie rendered impregnab le. For whils t under the presentsystem any individual or group may set out to break at rust , no such compeunon would be possible in a Statewhere p riva te enterp r ise had been made iIIejla!. Th e meltin con trol of na tionalised industries would therefore beab le to exercise ab so lute authority both ove r the wo rkerand the cons ume r. further , if t he " 'orker can be persuadedto accept the ult imate scheme of Communism . which iscompulsory labo ur in return for no monetary r em uner a tion , but me re lr a daily raucn of food and the orberneces sar ies of l ife whenever Slate officials decide that herequ ires them. th e directors (If Labour, lik e the oversee rs in a slave plantation , ...-ill be able. as in Russia to


14/16

Iac iluare the sal e or hatter of g-oods between countries.1 he cohesion \\hich eiisu amongst them would ;,peCdlhlead to rhe monopolisation of all the higher pos tsby members of the ir race . . . . .It is idle to dismiss such a posslhlbt}' as a chimera.This is what happened in Russia and is happening inGermany to-day. Here, the n, we. mar find perhaps theinne r ffif'an ing of a remark a ttribu ted to a pr ommen tmembe r of the Labour Party. that under Sociali sm a ce rta in well-known Jewish capit alist might well be worth.(;10,000 a year. Lenin expressed much the s ~ ideawhen he said tha t the RUSSian Soviet Republic m ightreq uir e a thousand firsl-c las,' and that ' these j;l"rea.test "stars"must be paid 23.000 roubles each,' or even fou r t imesthat sum, ! ' u r > ~ i n K it were necessary to emplOJ. Icretgn~ p c c i a l i , u for the purpose.But the j ewish capitalists doubtless 5 further that inEng-land as in a this condit ion of things would beme rely u mpo rarr phase , and that the Inst itution ofSocialism br d i s p o s ~ e s ~ i n l l " th e present Genti le o ....-ners ofweal th and I,rope-ny would pave the wa} for a j ewish andGerman (s ic ) plu tocracy. In Russia ....-ealth has not beenaltogt>ther destroyed; it has simply changed bands , and adOl$'!! of new rich has sprung up which meet s with nohcsdlnv from the professed advocates 01 equali ty. T hos ej,.\\S who see in the Christian Intelligentsia the mainobstacle to their dream of wo rld-power , therefore na lurallyfind in the promoters ef class-warfare their mos t valuablea llies. FQr the Ch ristian Intelligentsia is the sole ba r tothe ensfavement Qf the prole tariat; mos t of the movementsto redrese the wrongs Qf the workers, from Lord Shaftesburv's onwa rds. hone a risen not amonc st the r e themselves, but amon!:" the upper or midd le classes ; oncethese were swept away an iron bu reaucracy would haveth e workers at thei r me rcy. I do not say th is is tbe plan,but I do sa r that such a hypothesi s provides a reasonfor the otherwise unaccountable indulgence displayed bySocialists everywhere towards wea lthy Jews an d at thesame time for the huge funds the Socialists appear tohave at t hei r disposal.I f bi.l(" financie rs are not at their back. I re peat : wheredocs all th e mane)' come from? It seems unli kely that itca n be de rived from the Bri tish owne rs of weal th andproperty whom the Socialists are openly out to dis possess:the only body of financier s which can therefore be suspeered of conrributing towards this end is th e body knownas ' International Finance, ' which is ma inly, though notexcluvively (sicl. j e ...ish."Th i s is, of co urse, a marvellously clear andrea soned answer to th e q uestion raised. I t is a q ues tion whi ch ha s been a st umbling -block to a g'rear man ypeople wor ried by t ha t j ewish whispe r-drive, " Bu tthe re a rc some Komi j ews." T hi s an swer of Mrs.\Vebs ler's should ent irel y relieve th em of th eir misg v Unfortunately, there ar e in th is chapter one o rtwo poin t s to wh ich we must t ake exception. A rnis,take ha s been made, which was the mistake al so mad eby Hil aire Be-lloc in his book " Thc Jews. " Th is mis-ta ke is one which it is very ea sy to make in a book onth is particula r sub jec t . for th e o nly logica l concl usionswhich rnn he drawn nrc o f so d ra s tic a nature that thewriter knows full wen the uninstructed mind will di-.count them, a nd ha ulks a t reco rding them. Consequenrly, mistake is in dr awing- conclusions wh ich,hadng- re!-:':Lr work, a fte r desc ribing- very clea rlythe true chnr:ll:le r o f th e j ews, propounds as the ontyp!'ible solution of the problem- a change of heart onthe p art o f the Jew! Anything mor e nonsensical couldhardl)' be imagined , a nd it was obviously wr itten w ithhi s tongue in hi s cheek. The wri te r of t he book be foreU50 falls in to th e same e rro r. S he says, for instance," tn lea lit}, nothing is more cruel tban to encouragein th e minds of a lIen,ous rac e the idea of persuticm;tr ue kindne!'s tQ the jews would consist in u rging them totbro. off memories of past mart}TdotD and to en ter be;;dthfu"y into the enjoyment of their present b l e s ! t i nare The direct outcQme of Christi3n chilis.ariQ!l_\Ve do no t know whethf'r ~ I r s ""ebsterr e a l i ~ '" hat ...he has aid in this p " < ~ t e

a t on ce tha t II I mo re than nonsense ; it is aL"O lIDot ru th . T he present ble ssings of the Jews in this count rv a re not th e result of Christ ia n civil isation, they ar ethe result o f the abnega tion of Chr istian clvll isaricn.In a Ch rist ian civilisation j ews would have been kep tin th eir rig-ht place. If t ru e kindness to the jewewould consist in urg-ing- them t o e nt er healthfully in totheir p resent hlcssing-s, which are. incidentally, thedomina tion of the English Chr istian people, then theJew s k now a t once that t hey need no t . x .. t rue kindness " a t ou r hands" Ou r determina tionis to see that they a re relieved of their " present bless;inKs" as soon a 50 may be.Ag-aio la te r on she says ;-.. T he truth is, of course , that kindness to any por tionof the huma n race briDlfs its own reward in th e form ofmoral improvemen t in the individua l or nation which performs it. bu t no more bene6.t at taches to philant h ropbywhen exercised towards the jew than towa rds the Chinaman,.. I would urge , then. th at the j ewis h Problem shouldbe app roached neither in the spir it of superstitious pro.$emit ism , nor in the b iller spi.rit of ant i-Semit ism, butwith the sanity ",,orth) ' of an enhlfhtened age. "

T he po in t is, of co urse , a s to what would const itu te .. ki nd ness to the j ew , " If it would be " k indnes-, ' to a homicidal man iac to permit him the freedom to e xe rcise hi s mad tendency , t hen it would be. . kindne ss " to allow a s imilar freedom to the J ew ,fo r the be nefit which is derived from th is f orm of kindnes s in th e latter cas-e is similar to the benefi t whichth ose s upposui nous pe rsons who we re foolish enoughto show " k indness" in the former case would presumably de rive. Such a sugg e st io n is obviously absurd .A fu rthe r point to which we take exception is thestatement tha t the very existence of a j ewish organisation .. working for the de s truction of Chris ti anity isst ill a matter o f speculation and no t a known fact. "It is r ightly sa ld . . we cannot cit e the names of theleaders, or the centres of direclion, we cannot p roducedocumentary evidence as to their methods of o rganisation or thei r fina l a ims" ; bu t the se a re not th e onlyspl'Cit>s of evidence ava ilable, a nd of other k inds thereis, sure ly , weight o f ev idence eno ugh to de finitely provethe existence o f this " j ew i."h org-anisation . "In ano ther pa rt of her wor k Mrs. Webster hasdenounced the claim constant ly pu t forward by thedi fferen t SUhvN !'ive mo vements th at Ch rist was a revo lut ionary and that t he early Chr ist ians were commu .nlsts, Consequently we are astounded to read in theopen ing part of the chapte r with which we ar e dealingthe foll ow ing clause :-

t he Ch r istian d ispensation, 'whereby allmen are declared equal ill !h e: sigh t of God , ..Now t his is the , -cry here s)' which she has beenpreviously denouncing". It is the most damnable heresywith which th e Christian Church is now faced. TheCbristjnn dispcnsanon has neve r declared that all

men a re " eq ual .. in the s ig ht of God . I t ha s beendecla red to avai l " eq ually" fo r all mankind. not.-ith standing differences-a wholly difiernlt declaration.Thi s is on e of the most importan t points of Christiandoc trine wh ich it is e t t S ~ r y fo r ~ in this presen tag-e. to hn e clea r l)" in our mind!.. "fbo5.e clerics 1Iibote ach t hat t he Chr .. t dedared an menequa l in the se-ltt maay o f them ared o i n ~ are no' t aati-Qu-is.

i a i t ~ - - d w Wereally lira i' e fallen

..


15/16

CORRESPONDENCE.To the Editor o{ Tm; BRITTSII G U _ \ R D I . ~ S .

Dear Sir,-

Lo ,"NS- A Pro/>!n" .A ' and ' B ' are groce rs and compete {or the trade 0(a small town. They fan ou t and KO to Law. The c:aselasts Along time and the costs Are heavy. In the end ' Bloses and is responsible for all costs of the fight.In the meantime he hu secured his business assets in

such a way that ' A ' o.nnot seize Anything. .... conferencefollows an d experts appoin ted by each party r r that A ' sha ll now lend money to B' to enable him to enterinto even stronger competition .What pressure could possibly be brought to bear on, A ' to induce him to agree to such suicidal business? A nswtr.- A mortgage is held by a third party over allthe assets of bot h ' A ' And ' B' and he forces them toag ree to his plan.Substitute England for A ' and Germany for ' B ' andsay who is the third party .

YOU" {ailMully,2nd September, 1924" T INA ETiMES

IleAr Sir,I am milch touched by the farewell which you giveto La Vitoill, Frfl ll ce in the last number of Tm; BRITISHGU,\Il.D1A:-I . I f there 'could he any consolation for me, itwould be in seei llj;t T il l: IlIl.ITISH - \ so inreresringand so well etened.The total conquest of France it. well shown by theposition of its chief, Herriot, "'ho you see everywhereRanked b} a f e ' e and An Is rael-at least these two do notcamouflage themselves : for I srael (formerly a deputy kickedou t by the electors), the Kahal has ordered the creation ofa new office .. Secretarys hip general o f the Presidency of theCouncil," ....ith the sien ing pm..ers of the President of theCouncil during his absence j that is to say Israel isofficially the coadjutor, cont roller, inspirer and mentor ofour " apparent" Premier. I t is even moreope n than it waswith Clemenceau's :\IandelRothschild. 1 am glad that) "OU should have realised the collusion of the AcnQtlFrtJJu aist people with 1ew1). The incident of the Proto"eels had unmasked them ; ~ l Beamish had conclusi ..-epersonal experience of it.

Th e recent works of Mrs. Webtiter have well proved thatthe Orleani sls have been associated with the Jews and thePrussians against France {or more than a century and ahalf.T he present situation ill but the logical outcome offormer events.1 thank you verr cordially for your sympathies. .. Whilethere's life there's hope." That which I no longerpossess the means to do in the open daylight, J continue inthe shadow and by indirect means. Look on me Illways asa brother in arms and AS a friend.I tBd . du Palais, Paris. URBA INGOHIt:R,

17/8/2


16/16

THEBRIT ISH GUARDIAN

9 VOL. V. SEPTEMBER , 1924.

The Proteus of Peoples.=-

The Infamous Russian Treaty .

PRICK I X P ~ N C . M Ol'iTHLY ,

Rudyard Kipling's Speech of 1914.The Conservative Party.Mrs. Webster's Book.The House of Jews.

Our Effort to Beat Mond.General Prescctt-Decie'e Mistake. Loyalty League Workers. Lord Ernlc's Jewish Mind .

Alien Immigration and National Emig rll.tton. Sir Alfred Mond 's Kosher (?) Piee.How the Jews Can Help Us. A Retort to Dean lnge.

CORRESPONDENCE.

Documents

The British Guardian Paper 1924-09