41
The Arctic boundary layer Interactions with the surface, and clouds, as learned from observations (and some modeling) Michael Tjernström Department of Meteorology & the Bert Bolin Center for Climate Research, Stockholm University With the help of many: Ola Persson, Chris Fairall, Ian Brooks, Matthew Shupe, Thorsten Mauritsen, Joseph Sedlar, Cathryn Birch and many, many others

The Arctic boundary layer - ECMWF · 2015. 12. 31. · Ian Brooks, Matthew Shupe, Thorsten Mauritsen, Joseph Sedlar, Cathryn Birch and many, many others. Context • A few words about

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • The Arctic boundary layer

    Interactions with the surface, and clouds, as learned from observations (and some modeling)

    Michael Tjernström

    Department of Meteorology & the Bert Bolin Center

    for Climate Research, Stockholm University

    With the help of many: Ola Persson, Chris Fairall,

    Ian Brooks, Matthew Shupe, Thorsten Mauritsen,

    Joseph Sedlar, Cathryn Birch and many, many

    others

  • Context

    • A few words about observations, or the lack thereof

    • Boundary-layer structure

    • Interaction with the surface: the seasonal story and what’s below

    • Interactions with clouds

    • Some modeling – here and there

    2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Surface obs

    Soundings

    Aircraft obs

    Buoys &ships

    A few words aboutobservations

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    ASCOS 2008

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström

    Winter

    Summer

    Tjernström & Graversen 2009

    Arctic troposphere vertical structureFrom SHEBA soundings

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström

    Winter

    Summer

    Tjernström & Graversen 2009

    Arctic troposphere vertical structureFrom SHEBA soundings

  • Arctic troposphere vertical structure

    Winter

    From SHEBA soundings

    All seasons: Stable layer 200 m to ~2 km, near neutral 5-8 km & often near neutral PBL.

    Winter: Additionally strong surface inversions ~ 50% of the time

    Summer

    Tjernström & Graversen 20092011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström

    Surface inversion

    Lifted inversion

    ”Boundary layer”

    Winter Spring Summer Autumn

    Surface 53% 15% 9% 61%

    Lifted 47% 85% 91% 39%

    Tjernström & Graversen 2009

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Inversion base height

    Inversion strength

    Inversion thickness

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Near-surface stability

  • ~400 m

    ~300 m

    ~300 m

    ~300 -600 m

    2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Vertical thermal structure

  • ~1 km

    ~1.5 km

    ~600 m

    ~500 m

    2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Vertical moisture structure

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Winter

    Spring

    Summer

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    SHEBA surface temperatures

    Air temperature

    Surface temperature

    Sub-snow surface

    Across the ice

    Across the snow

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    SHEBA Relative humidity

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    SHEBA Relative humidity

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Winter

    Spring

    Summer

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Winter

    Spring

    Summer

    SHEBA stability

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    SHEBA sensible heat flux

    Winter

    Spring

    Summer

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    SHEBA latent heat flux

    Winter

    Spring

    Summer

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Non-melt season: Variable Ts < 0° C

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Non-melt season: Variable Ts < 0° C

    Melt season: Fixed Ts ≈ 0° C

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    SHEBA Polar Night

  • Momentum transfer to the surface

    Tjernström et al. 20082011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Surface sensible heat flux

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Surface latent heat flux

  • Clouds in global models

    2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Don’t use!

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Clouds in global models

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Winter conditions

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    < 200 m100 m to 1 km

    200 m to 1 km< 1km or >20 km

    Summ

    er conditions

  • Clouds in regional models

    2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

  • Surface energybalance

  • 27 May, 2010 / Michael Tjernström

    Sur

    face

    clo

    udfo

    rcin

    g(W

    m-2

    )

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    What is a cloud?

    Cloud base (lidar)

    Cloud top (radar)

  • 2011-11-08 / Michael Tjernström, Stockholm University

    Surface basedboundary layer

    Cloud generatedboundary layer

  • Some reflections…• What we think we know about small scale features

    such as low-troposphere vertical structure, clouds and surface fluxes rests on very “thin ice”. As a consequence modeling with out observational constraints is problematic; even reanalysis is difficult

    • Some things stand out:

    –The over-all boundary-layer structure is dominated by near-neutral conditions, but strong lasting surface inversions do occur in winter

    –Three surface coupling regimes: melt (summer, fixed Ts), non-melt (spring, responsive Ts) and polar night (winter, no sun).

    –Near-surface moisture remains close to saturation – almost always!– In winter, conduction through ice & snow is as important as sensible

    heat flux and snow thickness is critical–Low clouds dominate, but clouds are sometimes optically thin. In

    summer this is because of sometimes very low aerosol concentrations while cloud-water phase is also important, especially in winter

    –Surface energy balance is dominated by (LW) radiation while turbulent heat fluxes are small ⇒ focus more on the momentum flux?

    The Arctic boundary layer ��Interactions with the surface, and clouds, as learned from observations (and some modeling)ContextSlide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Slide Number 26Slide Number 27Slide Number 28Slide Number 29Slide Number 30Slide Number 31Slide Number 32Slide Number 33Slide Number 34Slide Number 35Slide Number 36Surface energy�balanceSlide Number 38Slide Number 39Slide Number 40Some reflections…