The 4th Stakeholders MeetingNegotiation and Prioritization

Low Emission Land Use Planning (LELUP)Don Lig Province

Low Emission Land Use Planning Framework

Enabling Environment

Assessment of Current Condition

Analysis of Future

Options

Negotiate and Prioritize Implementati

on Plan

Monitor and Evaluation

Low Emission Land Use Planning

1.1 Regulatory Assessments

1.2 Stakeholder Engagement

1.3 Planning & Development Goals & Objectives

2.1 Environment, Social, & Economic Data Needs

2.2 Understanding Historic Land Use Change

2.3 Data & Capacity Gap Assessment

3.1 Modeling Future Trends

3.2 Business as Usual Baseline Construction

3.3 Scenario Assessment

4.1 Negotiate Agreement on Options

The objective s of meeting

1) To discuss on the advantage and disadvantage of the agriculture intensification scenarios

2) Brainstorm and detail policies and actions necessary to implement the LELUP across the province

Meeting Activity

- Activity 1: Plenary discussion on the advantage and disadvantage of the agriculture intensification scenarios- Activity 2: Group discussion to set up

policies and actions necessary to implement the LELUP across the province

3 scenarios developed

Forest Cover Notes

No Industrial Agriculture expansion

Forest cover drops to 50% by 2025

A negative feedback loop between forest loss and economic instability

3000ha of the FoodCo’s Agriculture expansion

Forest cover increases to 70% by 2025

Increased plantation area and positive feedback between income generation and reduced encroachment

8000ha of the FoodCo’s Agriculture expansion

Forest cover increases to 65% by 2025

Loss of natural forest and gain in economics

Target 60% of Forest cover are maintained by 2025

Environmental and economic equilibrium

1st Activity: Scenario Discussion

Key Assessment Criteria Linked to Objectives

Employment Biodiversity Forest Cover

Water GHG Emissions

No Industrial Agriculture expansion

+++ -- - + --

3000ha of the FoodCo’s

Agriculture expansion

- - + + -

8000ha of the FoodCo’s

agriculture expansion

- ++ ++ - ++

2nd Activity: Group Discussion

Group 1: Private Sector

– SMART– FoodCo– New

investment

Group 2: Governmental Agencies

Group 3: Academic Professors and NGOs

– CSO– DAFF– Forest Dpt

– USAID– Academics

professor– WELL Program

Policies and Action Plan

Policy and field actions

Timing Expected outcomes

Resourcing Responsibility

References

Dore, J., Robinson, J. and Smith, M. (Eds) (2010). Negotiate – Reaching agreements over water. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2010-006.pdf

Engel, A. and Korf, B. (2005)., Negotiation and mediation techniques for natural resource management, FAO Rome http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/a0032e/a0032e00.HTM

GIZ (2011) Stakeholder Dialogues: Manualhttp://www.collectiveleadership.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/publications/SD-Manual_EN_021111_Download.pdf

Worah, S. (2008), Participatory Management of Forests & Protected Areas: A Trainers’ Manual, RECOFTC, Bangkok Thailandhttp://www.recoftc.org/site/uploads/content/pdf/Participatory_management_web_58.pdf