Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025 › fileadmin › user_upload › Produkte › LanGarantie-Syst… · Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025 GHMT Type approval Connector,

This Test Report with the measurements consists of 29 pages.

GHMT AG and the customers shall grant each other an unlimited right to copy and disclose this report insofar as the measuring results and specifications published are neither modified nor rendered incomplete. Third parties are not permitted to copy this report or excerpts thereof nor misuse it in any other fashion without obtaining our written approval.

Document-no.: P3755b-14-E

Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025

GHMT Type approval

Connector, Copper, Category 6A

nach ISO/IEC 11801 Ed.2.2

Project-no.: MCTBA0614

GHMT Type approval Project-no.: MCTBA0614

Connector, Copper, Category 6A, ISO/IEC 11801 Ed.2.2 Document-no.: P3755b-14-E

GHMT AG Bexbach/Germany page 2 of 29 Certified test laboratory according to DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025; Certified for system and product-related quality assurance in accordance with Rule KTA 1401 of the German Nuclear Safety Standards Commission KTA

© GHMT AG, Please observe note on industrial property rights pursuant to DIN ISO 16016

Table of Contents

Table of Contents ................................................................................................. 2

Revision history ................................................................................................... 3

1 General statements ................................................................................ 4

1.1 Test Laboratory ........................................................................................... 4

1.2 Test Date ................................................................................................... 4

1.3 Test Site ..................................................................................................... 4

1.4 Test Conducted by ........................................................................................ 4

1.5 Persons Present at Test ................................................................................. 4

2 Customer............................................................................................. 5

2.1 Address ..................................................................................................... 5

2.2 Responsible contact person ........................................................................... 5

3 Device under test (DUT) ........................................................................... 6

3.1 Description of the Components ....................................................................... 6

3.2 Provision ................................................................................................... 6

4 Test Type ............................................................................................. 7

4.1 Reference of testing ..................................................................................... 7

4.2 Test parameters........................................................................................... 7

4.2.1 Insertion loss .............................................................................................. 8

4.2.2 Near-end crosstalk attenuation (NEXT).............................................................. 9

4.2.3 Power-sum near-end cross-talk (PS NEXT) ........................................................ 10

4.2.4 Far-end cross-talk (FEXT) .............................................................................. 11

4.2.5 Power-sum far-end cross-talk (PS FEXT) .......................................................... 12

4.2.6 Propagation delay ...................................................................................... 13

4.2.7 Delay skew ................................................................................................ 14

4.2.8 Return loss ................................................................................................ 15

4.2.9 Coupling attenuation .................................................................................. 16

4.2.10 Transfer impedance .................................................................................... 17

5 Standards ........................................................................................... 18

5.1 Applied Rules and Regulations ...................................................................... 18

5.2 Deviations ................................................................................................ 18

5.3 None Standardised Test Procedures ................................................................. 18

6 Testing equipment ............................................................................... 19

7 Summary............................................................................................ 20

8 ANNEX: Documentation of measurements .................................................... 21

8.1 SETUP ....................................................................................................... 22

8.2 Measurement results of the HF-parameters ...................................................... 23

8.3 Measurement results of the EMC-parameters .................................................... 29





Revision history

Document number Date Content/ Changes

P3755b-14-E 28.11.2014 initial version





1 General statements

1.1 Test Laboratory

GHMT AG

In der Kolling 13

66450 Bexbach, Germany

Phone: +49 / 68 26 / 92 28 – 0

Fax: +49 / 68 26 / 92 28 – 290

E–Mail: [email protected]

Internet: www.ghmt.de

1.2 Test Date

Receipt of goods: 28. October 2014

Test number: 14-A306

Testing from: 10. November 2014

until: 26. November 2014

during: (23 ± 3)°C

1.3 Test Site

Accredited Test Laboratory of GHMT AG, Bexbach

1.4 Test Conducted by

Mr. Bernd Jung, GHMT AG

1.5 Persons Present at Test

Mr. Stefan Grüner, GHMT AG (present temporarily)





2 Customer

2.1 Address

J. W. Zander GmbH & Co. KG Essen

Nünningstraße 1

45141 Essen-Frillendorf, Germany

Phone: +49 201 1704 -0

Fax: +49 201 1704 -122

Internet: www.zander-gruppe.de

2.2 Responsible contact person

Wilhelm Rink GmbH & Co. KG

Mr. Uwe Weller

Siegmund - Hiepe - Strasse 28-32

35578 Wetzlar, Germany

Phone: +49 6441 913 - 190

Fax: +49 6441 913 - 103

E-Mail: [email protected]

Internet: www.rink-elektro.de





3 Device under test (DUT)

3.1 Description of the Components

The following sample(s) was/were part of the test:

DUT: AS-Dose Cat.6A re-embedded 8 UPK RAL9010

Part-no.: ZA-TEC 9500864

Condition

of the sample(s):

The sample(s) had no visible damages

Picture:

3.2 Provision

The DUT was / the specimens were...

… with drawn on site. The selection of the sample / the samples was carried out by GHMT.

... obtained by GHMT through resellers. The sampling procedures was neutral and unaffected by the client.

... obtained by GHMT through the client. The selection of the sample / the samples was carried out by client. Hence there was no neutral sampling by GHMT.





4 Test Type

4.1 Reference of testing

Connecting Hardware test in reference to the specifications for Cat. 6A according to

IEC 61156 - 5 Ed. 2.1

Figure 1: Re-Embedded Testsetup

4.2 Test parameters

The following parameters were determined at the specimens in the course of these measurements and refer to the draft proposal mentioned in chapter 4.1:

HF-parameters:

Attenuation

Near-end Crosstalk (NEXT)

Power sum NEXT (PS NEXT)

Far-end Crosstalk (FEXT)

Power sum FEXT (PS FEXT)

Return loss

Propagation delay

Delay skew

EMC-parameters:

Coupling attenuation

Transfer impedance





4.2.1 Insertion loss

SMZ

SMZ

Baluns

Sender

Empfänger

A B

Adernpaar

Definition The attenuation is determined by the ratio of the power supplied to the port A and the measured power at the port B as specified below:

B

AV

P

P log 10 = [dB] a

Both the input and the output of the two-port network must be terminated with the nominal impedance.

Influencing variables In case of cables, the attenuation is primarily determined by the cross-sectional area and the conductivity of the copper wires. Especially in high frequency ranges, the attenuation is increased by the dielectric losses of the core insulating material.

The attenuation is dependent on the length, the frequency, and the temperature.

Meaning A low attenuation improves the transmission reliability of the cabling system. The attenuations of cables and connecting devices are accumulative although they are largely dominated by those of the cables.





4.2.2 Near-end crosstalk attenuation (NEXT)

SMZ

SMZ

Baluns

Transmitter

Receiver

Core pair 1

Core pair 2

A

B

Zo

Zo

Definition The near-end crosstalk attenuation is determined by the ratio of the power supplied to the port A and the measured power at the port B as specified below:

B

ANEXT

P

P log 10 = [dB] a

Both sides of the specimen must be terminated with the nominal impedance. In the event that the sender and the receiver are located at the same end of the specimen, we are speaking of near-end crosstalk (NEXT) attenuation.

Influencing variables In case of cables, the near-end crosstalk attenuation is primarily determined by the twisting of the cores and (if existing) the paired foil screens.

The near-end crosstalk attenuation is largely dependent on the frequency and – to a minor degree – also on the lengths.

Meaning A high near-end crosstalk attenuation improves the reliability of transmissions. Within the cabling system, the reliability of transmissions is primarily determined by the component having the lowest near-end crosstalk attenuation.





4.2.3 Power-sum near-end cross-talk (PS NEXT)

Definition The power sum of the near-end cross-talk is defined on the basis of the ratio of the power input at the three pairs A, B and C to the power output at pair D. The power-sum NEXT value of cables can be measured by means of a phase-correlated 4-port power splitter. On the basis of the pair-to-pair NEXT measurements, the power sum can also be calculated according to the following formula:

3

1i

0,1-

10 log 10 = [dB] aiNEXTa

PSNEXT

Influencing factors The power-sum NEXT value of cables is decisively influenced by the stranding and the foil pair shield (if applicable). Power-sum NEXT strongly depends on the frequency used and – only to a minor extent – on the cabling length.

Meaning With regard to network protocols that distribute the bi-directional data load over all four pairs, power-sum NEXT is of great importance for transmission reliability since power-sum cross-talk is expected to impair transmission via the data channel.





4.2.4 Far-end cross-talk (FEXT)

Definition The far-end cross-talk (abbr. FEXT) is determined by the ratio of the power measured at the remote port B to the power measured at the remote port C. The measuring signal is supplied to the near end of the cable.

C

BFEXT

P

P log 10 = [dB] a

All pairs of the EUT are terminated with their characteristic impedance.

Influencing factors The FEXT value of cables is decisively influenced by the stranding and the foil pair shield (if applicable).

FEXT strongly depends on the frequency used.





4.2.5 Power-sum far-end cross-talk (PS FEXT)

Definition The power-sum FEXT value can be calculated on the basis of the pair-to-pair FEXT measurements according to the following formula:

3

1i

0,1-

10 log 10 = [dB] aiFEXTa

PSFEXT

Meaning With regard to network protocols that distribute the bi-directional data load over all four pairs, power-sum FEXT is of great importance for transmission reliability since cross-talk is expected to impair transmission via the data channel.





4.2.6 Propagation delay

SMZ

SMZ

Baluns

Transmitter

Receiver

A B

Pair of Cores

Definition The velocity of propagation v of cables is stated in relation to the maximum velocity of propagation of electromagnetic waves in the vacuum co. The parameter "Nominal Velocity of Propagation" (abbr. NVP) is defined as follows:

NVPv

oc

The delay is the period of time the signal requires in order to travel through a cabling link with a length of l. The delay is calculated on the basis of the NVP value (Nominal Velocity of Propagation) of the cable and the velocity of light c0 according to the following formula:

cNVP

l

0

Influencing factors The delay of cables is decisively influenced by the dielectric loss of the core insulation material. This material-induced loss may be minimised by selecting various compounds and by varying the degree of foaming.

The impact of colour addition on the NVP value is not to be neglected since the colours vary strongly in their dielectric constants, which are considerably higher than in the basic compound.





Influencing factors

(continued) The velocity of propagation does not depend on the cable length and may be calculated on the basis of the measurement of the length-dependent group delay. The reference length used for calculation is the cable length and not the lay length of the twisted pairs. Different lay length values in the four pairs lead to different NVP values.

Meaning In order to ensure distortion-free signal transmission, the velocity of propagation must not fall below a lower limiting value, which is determined by the system requirements. The velocity of propagation has to be virtually independent of the frequency within the signal bandwidth in order to avoid a divergence of the spectral signal components.

High-bit rate network protocols that use parallel data transmission via the four pairs, moreover, require a highly consistent velocity of propagation in order to avoid synchronisation errors. Future normative standards will define this so-called "delay skew".

4.2.7 Delay skew

Definition The delay skew of cables with a length of l marks the time difference between signals travelling along the individual transmission links at the propagation velocity vi,j.

= li j

i j

v v

v v

Influencing factors The delay skew of cables is decisively influenced by the dielectric loss of the core insulation material and the various lay length values.

Meaning The delay skew will be an important parameter for a distortion-free data transmission in balanced cables in view of future network protocols.





4.2.8 Return loss

SMZ

Balun

Receiver

Transmitter

Pair of Cores Return loss measuring bridge

R = Z

Differential-mode termination

Definition The return loss represents the ratio of the power supplied to the DUT to the power reflected by the DUT.

output

input

RP

P log 10 = [dB] a

The EUT end is terminated with the characteristic impedance in order to absorb any non-reflected power. The DUT and the test-value transmitter must have the same rated impedance in the broadband range.

Influencing factors The return loss value of cables is decisively influenced by the homogeneity of the conductors and the core of the cable. Mechanical load during the manufacturing or installation of the cables may impair the return loss.

The parameters return loss and characteristic impedance correlate.

Meaning A high degree of return loss improves the transmission reliability. A low degree of return loss may lead to an unwanted overlap of returning signal components.





4.2.9 Coupling attenuation

Definition Coupling Attenuation is the relation between the transmitted power through the conductor and the maximum radiated peak power, conducted and generated by the excited common mode currents. The measurement is independent of the bandwith and shall be measured form 30MHz up to 1GHz.

Influencing factors The Coupling Attenuation is primarily determined by the mechanical structure of the component. The Coupling Attenuation is very much dependent on the frequency.

Meaning The better the effectiveness of the Coupling Attenuation is, the smaller is the value of the noiseresistance.

RECEIVER

Terminated far end

of cable

FERRITE,far-end-positionCLAMP

REFLECTOR PLATE

with balun-transformer

DUT

FAR END

EXTENSION CABLECABLE ASSEMBLY

NEAR END

EXTENSION CABLE

600 + 10cm





4.2.10 Transfer impedance

Definition As soon as an electromagnetic wave reaches a screen, it induces an interference current IDisturb.. This current produces a voltage UDisturb. along the inner conductor. The coupling factor

IU

ZeDisturbanc

eDisturbanc

T

has the dimension of a complex impedance and is called transfer impedance ZT. The transfer impedance consists of a real part – i.e. the coupling resistance RC – and an imaginary part. In many cases, only the coupling resistance will be of practical importance for the evaluation of the shielding effectiveness.

it is indicated per unit of length and has the dimension m/m.

Influencing factors In case of shielded cables, the coupling resistance is primarily determined by the mechanical structure of the braided screen and/or by inserted foil screens. The coupling resistance is very much dependent on the frequency.

Meaning The better the effectiveness of a shield is, the smaller is the value of the coupling resistance.

U2KM





5 Standards

5.1 Applied Rules and Regulations

ISO/IEC 11801 Ed. 2.2: 2011-06

Information technology – Generic cabling for customer premises

IEC 60603-7-51 (2010-03) Ed. 1.0

Connectors for electronic equipment-

Part 7-51: Detail specification for 8-way, shielded, free and fixed connectors,

for data transmissions with frequencies up to 500 MHz (Cat.6A)

5.2 Deviations

None.

5.3 None Standardised Test Procedures

None.





6 Testing equipment

The following testing equipment was used for the measurements:

Equipment Manufacturer Stock ID

Network Analyzer I Rohde & Schwarz GHMTA0002

Network Analyzer II Agilent GHMTA0018

LCR-Meter Agilent GHMTA0034

HV-Tester ETL-Prüftechnik GHMTA0031

Time-Domain-Reflectometer Tektronix GHMTA0004

Triaxial tube Bedea / Rosenberger GHMTB0314

Reference clamp GHMT GHMTA0047

Absorbing Clamp Lüthi GHMTA0070

Decoupling Clamp Lüthi GHMTA0071

Switch unit I Novotronic GHMTA0028

Re-Embedded Testsetup OCC GHMTA0096

Schedule 1: Measurement equipment





7 Summary

Customer: J. W. Zander GmbH & Co. KG

Nünningstraße 1

45141 Essen-Frillendorf, Germany

DUT: AS-Dose Cat.6A re-embedded 8 UPK RAL9010

Part-no.: ZA-TEC 9500864

Applied standards: ISO/IEC 11801 Ed. 2.2: 2011-06

Information technology – Generic cabling for customer premises

IEC 60603-7-51 (2010-03) Ed. 1.0

Connectors for electronic equipment-

Part 7-51: Detail specification for 8-way, shielded, free and fixed connectors, for data transmissions with frequencies up to 500 MHz (Cat.6A)

Results: The sample meets the limits of the specified standards and regulations with respect to the parameters indicated above.

The test results which were determined in the course of the measurement refer to the submitted specimen.

Bexbach, 01. December 2014

GHMT AG

In der Kolling 13

D-66450 Bexbach

[email protected]

www.ghmt.de

i.O. Stefan Grüner, engineer

(Head of Accrediteded Test Laboratory)





8 ANNEX: Documentation of measurements

As follows the measurement results of the tested parameters defined in chapter 4.2.





8.1 SETUP

HF parameters EMC parameters

S11 S21


Transfer impedance

Output Power 0 dBm 0 dBm 7 dBm 7 dBm

Frequency Range 1-500MHz 1-500 MHz 30-1000 MHz 0,1-100 MHz

IF Filter 100 Hz 100 Hz 30 Hz 30 Hz

NOP 500 500 971 971

AVG - - - -

Smoothing 0,3% 0,3% 0,3% 0,3%





8.2 Measurement results of the HF-parameters

Attenuation

-0,8

-0,7

-0,6

-0,5

-0,4

-0,3

-0,2

-0,1

0,0

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Att

enuati

on [dB]

Frequency [MHz]

Pair 12

Pair 36

Pair 45

Pair 78

Limit IEC 11801 Ed. 2.2 Cat. 6A





NEXT

NEXT (low, high)

-120

-110

-100

-90

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

NEX

T [d

B]

Frequency [MHz]

Pairs 12-36 Low

Pairs 12-36 High

Pairs 12-45 Low

Pairs 12-45 High

Pairs 12-78 Low

Pairs 12-78 High

Pairs 36-78 Low

Pairs 36-78 High

Pairs 45-78 Low

Pairs 45-78 High


-120

-110

-100

-90

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

NEX

T [d

B]

Frequency [MHz]

Pairs 36-45 Low

Pairs 36-45 High






NEXT (center low, center high)

PS NEXT

-120

-110

-100

-90

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

NEX

T [d

B]

Frequency [MHz]

Pairs 36-45 Center Low

Pairs 36-45 Center High


-120

-110

-100

-90

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

PS

NEX

T [d

B]

Frequency [MHz]

Pair 12

Pair 36

Pair 45

Pair 78






FEXT

PS FEXT

-120

-110

-100

-90

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

FEXT

[dB

]

Frequency [MHz]

Pairs 12-36

Pairs 12-45

Pairs 12-78

Pairs 36-45

Pairs 36-78

Pairs 45-78


-120

-110

-100

-90

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

PS

FEX

T [d

B]

Frequency [MHz]

Pair 12

Pair 36

Pair 45

Pair 78






Propagation delay

Delay skew

-5,0

-4,0

-3,0

-2,0

-1,0

0,0

1,0

2,0

3,0

4,0

5,0

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Dela

y [n

s]

Frequency [MHz]

Pair 12

Pair 36

Pair 45

Pair 78


-0,5

-0,4

-0,3

-0,2

-0,1

0,0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

0,7

0,8

0,9

1,0

1,1

1,2

1,3

1,4

1,5

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Dela

y sk

ew

[ns]

Frequency [MHz]

Pairs 12-36

Pairs 12-45

Pairs 12-78

Pairs 36-45

Pairs 36-78

Pairs 45-78






Return loss

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Retu

rn L

oss

[dB]

Frequency [MHz]

Pair 12

Pair 36

Pair 45

Pair 78






8.3 Measurement results of the EMC-parameters


Transfer impedance

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Cou

pli

ng

Att

en

uati

on

[d

B]

Frequency [MHz]

Coupling attenuation(All in One)

blue near end

orange near end

green near end

brown near end

blue far end

orange far end

green far end

brown far end

Evaluation Envelope (CA= 57 dB)

ISO/IEC 11801 AMD2

0,10

1,00

10,00

100,00

1.000,00

10.000,00

100.000,00

1.000.000,00

0,10 1,00 10,00 100,00

Tran

sfer im

ped

an

ce [mΩ

/m]

Frequency [MHz]

triaxial set-up (Short-Matched)

Transfer impedance

Limit: Cat6A

Documents

Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025 › fileadmin › user_upload › Produkte › LanGarantie-Syst… · Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025 GHMT Type approval Connector,