Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    1/19

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:4

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    2/19

    2

    COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Defendants reside in this judicial district by virtue of their business activities in this distric

    and have committed acts of infringement or of contributory infringement and inducement

    of infringement within this judicial district.

    THE PARTIES

    3. Mr. Bennett is an individual, owner of U.S. Patent No. 5,599,000 (the 000Patent) and is a resident of Santa Clarita, Los Angeles County, California.

    4. On information and belief, Defendant Safe-T-Proof Disaster PreparedenssCompany Inc. (Safe-T-Proof) is a California corporation with its principal place of

    business at 6805 Nancy Ridge Drive, San Diego, CA 92121. Safe-T-Proof has appointed

    Michael L Essrig as its agent for service of process.

    5. On information and belief, Defendant Essrig Taylor Construction, Inc.(Essrig) is a California corporation with its principal place of business at 6650 Lusk

    Blvd., Ste. B205, San Diego, CA 92121. Essrig has appointed Michael L Essrig as its

    agent for service of process.

    FACTUAL BACKGROUND

    6. On February 4, 1997, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly anlegally issued the 000 Patent, for an invention entitled Article Securing Device with M

    Bennett named as sole inventor. A true and correct copy of the 000 Patent is attached as

    Exhibit A and incorporated here by reference.

    7. The 000 Patent is currently in full force and effect.8. All rights, title, and interest in the 000 Patent are owned by Mr. Bennett.

    FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANTS FOR

    IFNRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,599,000

    9. Plaintiff incorporates and re-alleges Paragraphs 1-8 of the Complaint asthough fully set forth here.

    10. On information and belief, Defendants have been and continue to infringe,both literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, the 000 Patent by making, using,

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 2 of 19 Page ID #:5

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    3/19

    3

    COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    importing, selling, and/or offering to sell in the United States, including this district,

    products covered by the 000 Patent. Examples of such products include, but are not

    limited to, the Safe-T-Proof Earthquake Fastening System and Equipment Fasteners, that

    infringe at least claim 1 of the 000 Patent.

    11. On information and belief, Defendants contribute to and induce others, suchas Defendants customers, to infringe, both literally and/or under the doctrine of

    equivalents, by their making, using, importing, selling, and/or offering to sell in the Unite

    States, including this district, products covered by the 000 Patent. Examples of such

    products include, but are not limited to, the Safe-T-Proof Earthquake Fastening System an

    Equipment Fasteners, that infringe at least claim 1 of the 000 Patent. These Fasteners are

    especially made and/or especially adapted for use in infringing the 000 patent and are no

    staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial noninfringing use.

    12. Defendants are liable for infringement of the 000 Patent pursuant to 35U.S.C. 271.

    13. Upon information and belief, Defendants have had knowledge of the 000Patent from at least May 31, 2001, and have had knowledge of their infringement of the

    000 Patent, yet continued to infringe. Defendants willfully and deliberately infringed the

    000 Patent entitling Mr. Bennett to increased damages under 35 U.S.C. 284, and to

    attorneys fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. 285.

    14. Mr. Bennett has been damaged by the infringement and/or inducement ofand/or contributory infringement of its patent by Defendants and will continue to be

    damaged by such infringement or inducement of and/or contributory infringement unless

    enjoined by the Court.

    15. Unless a preliminary and permanent injunction are issued enjoiningDefendants and their officers, agents, servants and employees, and all others acting on the

    behalves or in concert with Defendants, from infringing the 000 Patent, Mr. Bennett will

    be greatly and irreparably harmed.

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 3 of 19 Page ID #:6

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    4/19

    4

    COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF

    WHEREFORE, Mr. Bennett prays for judgment against Defendants as follows:

    1. For a judicial determination and declaration that Defendants have directlyinfringed, and continues to directly infringe, the 000 Patent;

    2. For a judicial determination and declaration that Defendants have induced, ancontinues to induce, infringement of the 000 Patent;

    3. For a judicial determination and declaration that Defendants havecontributorily infringed, and continues to contributorily infringe, the 000 Patent;

    4. For preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting Defendants, theirrespective subsidiaries, officers, agents, servants, employees, licensees, and all other

    persons or entities acting or attempting to act in active concert or participation with them

    acting on their behalf, from infringing the 000 Patent;

    5. For an order that Defendants pay to Mr. Bennett all damages arising out ofDefendants infringement, or inducement of, and/or contributory infringement in

    accordance with 35 U.S.C. Section 284, together with pre-judgment and post-judgment

    interest;

    6. For a judicial determination that this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C.Section 285 and that Defendants be ordered to pay Mr. Bennetts costs, expenses, and

    reasonable attorneys fees under 35 U.S.C. Sections 285 or as otherwise permitted by law

    7. For an award of damages according to proof; and8. For such other relief as justice requires.

    Dated: March 21, 2012 ONE LLP

    John E. Lord Esq.

    Attorneys for Plaintiff Terry Bennett

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 4 of 19 Page ID #:7

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    5/19

    5

    COMPLAINT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

    Plaintiff, Mr. Bennett hereby demands trial by jury in this action.

    Dated: March 21, 2012 ONE LLP

    John E. Lord, Esq.

    Attorneys for Plaintiff Terry Bennett

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 5 of 19 Page ID #:8

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    6/19

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 6 of 19 Page ID #:9

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    7/19

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 7 of 19 Page ID #:10

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    8/19

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 8 of 19 Page ID #:11

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    9/19

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 9 of 19 Page ID #:12

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    10/19

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 10 of 19 Page ID #:13

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    11/19

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 11 of 19 Page ID #:14

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    12/19

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 12 of 19 Page ID #:15

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    13/19

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 13 of 19 Page ID #:16

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    14/19

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 14 of 19 Page ID #:17

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    15/19

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 15 of 19 Page ID #:18

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    16/19

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 16 of 19 Page ID #:19

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    17/19

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 17 of 19 Page ID #:20

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    18/19

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 18 of 19 Page ID #:21

  • 8/2/2019 Terry Bennett v. Safe-T-Proof Disaster Preparedness et. al.

    19/19

    Case 2:12-cv-02443-MMM-SH Document 1 Filed 03/21/12 Page 19 of 19 Page ID #:22