TELEDYNE ENQINEERlNQ SERVICES · 2017. 3. 24. · ~

.->>-TELEDYNE

ENQINEERlNQ SERVICES

DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATIDN I'ROGRAM

SEMIMONTHLY REPORT

IDVP - SM - JULY

JULY 23, 1982

PREPARED BY:

TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES

IDVP PROGRAM MANAGER

8207300f85 820727PDR ADOCK 05000275

q R PDR

~ o

IDVP-SM-July 1982

><-TELEDYNEENQ[NEERINQ SERVlCES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. 0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 PHASE I PROGRAM

2.1 Program Plans

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

2.1.1 Management P 1 an2.1.2 Engineering Program Plan2.1.3 Other Program Procedures

2.2 Program Reports

2.2.1 Errot'ir Open Item Files2.2.2 Interim Technical Reports2.2.3 Phase I Final Report

2.3 RLCA Efforts

2.3.12.3.22.3.32.3.42.3.52.3.6

Design ChainInitial SampleAdditional Verification and Additional SamplingInterim Technical Report ActionsEOI File ActionsVisits and Meetings

2.4. RFR Efforts

2.5 TES Technical., Efforts

2.5.12.5.22.5.32.5.42.5.5

PGEE NSSS InterfacesContainment Annulus Str uctureAdditional Piping VerificationInter im Technical Report ActionEOI File Actions

999

1010

3.0 PHASE II PROGRAM

3.1 Program Plans

3.1.1 Management Plan3.1.2 Engineering Program Plan3.1.3 Other Program Procedures

10

10

101010

gi

0,

O.

.0

0

IDVP-SM-July 1982

)< TELEDYNEENGINEERtNQ SERVlCES

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)

3.2 Program Reports

3..2.1 Error or Open Item Files3.2.2 Interim Technical Reports3.2.3 Phase II Final Report

3.3 SWEC Efforts

PAGE

10

101011

3.3.13.3.23.3.33.3.43.3.53.3.63.3.73.3.83.3.9

Design ChainMechanical/NUclearElectricalInstrumentation and ControlsAnalysisLicensingInterim Technical Report ActionsEOI File ActionsVisits and Meetings

ll1111121314'14

1414

3.4 RFR Efforts 14

3.4.13.4.23.4.33.4.43.4.5

Design ChaingA and Design Control Practices EvaluationgA Audit and Review ReportsEOI File ActionsVisits and Meetings

1515161616

3.5 RLCA Efforts

3.6 TES Technical Efforts

3.6.1 Interim Technical Report Actions3.6.2 EOI File Actions

4.0 TES PROGRAM MANAGEMENT EFFORTS

4.1 TES Related4.2 RLCA Rel ated4.3 RFR Related4.4 SWEC Related4.5 Project Administration4.6 guality Assurance Activities

5.0 IDVP SCHEDULE

APPENDICES:

1. EOI FILE STATUS2. INTERIM TECHNICAL REPORT STATUS3. DESCRIPTION OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS fOR EOI AND ITR TRACKING

17

17

1717

17

171920202020

21

A:

~ o

0

~<-TELEDYNEENG)NEERlNG SERVlcES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This IDVP Semimonthly Report presents a summary of activitiesduring the period JUne 26, 1982 through July 23, 1982 and the status ofthe IDVP at the end of that time period.

Phase I efforts directed toward low power dperation, are pro-gressing. Work on the initial sample as defined in the program plans isprogressing and will be essentially completed before issuance of theIDVP Semimonthly Report in August. Four Intet'its Technical Reports,( ITR), of an anticipated 25-30 have been issued. Two of these areprogramnable and two are technical. Of the 177 Open Item Files opened todate, ten errors considered to be significant have been rectified, 39files have not yet been resolved and 128 files have been closed.

Of most significance to the completion of the initial sample, theidentification of planned corrective action and the planning for ad-ditonal verification and additional sampling with a participation of theCivil Engineering work being conducted by the Diablo Canyon Projectwhich was made to the IDVP on July 14-16, 1982. This participationenabled the IDVP to resolve approximately 20 EOI Files, three of whichresulted in error reports, permitted termination of inital sampling ac-tivities relative to the Auxiliary Building, and indicated possible con-tributions of the Project wol k to the IDVP program f'r additionalsampling and ver ifications.

The present plan for such additional work is in progress in accord-ance with ITR-l. Based upon the IDVP and Project work performed sincethat ITR was issued, a revision is being prepared.

The Phase II Program Plans have been submitted for NRC approval andwork has been inhibited. Design chains have been temporarily iden-tified, safety systems and analyses reviews have started, and the me-chanical and.structural evaluation work is being planned.

The IDVP has not yet achieved the development of a meaningful sched-ule for the completion of Phase I or Phase II. This aspect will receive

'ttentionduring the next reporting period.

.

o

IDVP -SM-July 1982

i< TELEDYNEENQINEERINQ SERVICES

l.0 'NTRODUCTION

The Independent Design Verification Program (IDVP) for the DiabloCanyon Nuclear Power Plant (DCNPP) is defined as consisting oftwo phases:

a. Phase I is responsive to NRC Order CLI-81-30 datedNNove~>er 19, 1981, is related to reetorat~on of the low powerlicense and considers the seismic-related efforts of thePacific Gas and Electric Company (PGEE) and of their service-related contracts prior to June 1, 1978.

b. Phase II is responsive to an NRC letter to PGKE dated November

~19, 981, is related to operation above 5% power, and con-siders non-seismic ser vice-related, contracts performed priorto June 1978, PGRE internal design activities and allservice-related contracts post-January 1978.

'Both

a. Consider only safety-related structures, systems and com-

ponents.

b. Are cohducted in accordance with documented ProgramManagement Plans which include associated Engineering ProgramPlans and other Program Procedures, all of which have been

approved by or are subject to the approVal of the NuclearRegulatory Coomission (NRC).

c. Are reported on simultaneously to PGLE and the NRC by means ofSemimonthly Reports, Error or Open Item File Reports, InterimTechnical Reports and .a Final Phase Report.

The organizations participating in the IDVP are:

1. Teledyne Engineering Services (TES) - Program Manager

2. Robert L. Cloud Associates, Inc. (RLCA) -,Seismic,Mechanical, and Str uctural

3. R. F. Reedy, Inc. (RFR) - gA and Design Control

4. Stone 5 Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC) - SafetySystems and Analyses (Phase II Only)

.

IDVP-SM-July 1982 -2-

>0 TELEDYNEENQINEERlNQ SERVICES

Beginning in July 1982, the IDVP Semimonthly Reports are issuedas follows:

2.0

a. On the second Friday of the month, each IDVP participant(TES, RLCA, RFR, and SWEC) compile phd issue all Open ItemReports, Program Resolution Reports, Error Reports, and IDVP

Completion Reports prepared since the last such compilation.

b. On the fourth Friday of each month, TES prepares and issues a

report, without EOI reports, on the status of the IDVP work.

PHASE I PROGRAM

2.1 Pro ram Plans

2.1.1

2.1.2

Mana emdnt Plans.

A Revision 1 to the Phase I Program Management Plan was submittedfor PGRE and NRC approval on July 3, 1982~ by TES 5511-66. The

text was revised to update TES organizational changes, to includeitems previously identified in TES Semimonthly Reports, forclarification and to be consistent with the Phase II ProgramManagement Plan. As stated in the transmittal, the only majorchange concerns the format of the IDVP Semimonthly Reports. Allother revisions to the text were intended to provide an improveddiscussion of the way the program has been operating, and was

intended to operate.

En ineerin Pro ram Plan DCNPP-IDVP-PP-001

The only revision submitted on July 3, 1982, to this Appendix 0

was a single page of errata correcting typographical errors.

As was stated in the transmittal letter, the revision was notresponsive to the NRC request that specific identification of thestructural elements to be sampled be provided. The request was

satisfied for the reinforced concrete portions of the structureby the Fifteenth (June 9, 1982) RLCA Semimonthly Report, and thatinformation was included on an attachment to. the transmittalletter. That attachment included the statement that "selectionof a sample of the steel members is pending a review of thequalification analysis". It was not possible to identify thesignificant structural members without r'eviewing the qualifica-tion analysis. By the procedure detailed in the plan qualifica-tion analysis could not be reviewed until the independent cal-culations were complete, after which the independent and qualifi-cation analyses could be compared and the significantly stressedstructural elements identified.

.

IDVP-SN-July 1982 -3-

-<<-TELEDYNEENQlNEER(NQ SERVtCES

In any event, the selection of building members for sample analy-sis is no 1'onger a part of the program. As reported later inthis Semimonthly Report, the independent analysis of the Aux-iliary building has b'een terminated by the issuance of an ErrorReport. The PGKE Corrective Action taken in response to thisError Report, as is true whenever an Ei ror Report is issued, issubject to verification by the IDVP. This verification willinclude consideration of the significantly stressed buildingmembers.

2.1.3 Other Pro ram Procedures

Two other Program Procedures are in the course of preparation.DCNPP-IDVP-007 will be titled " PGImE - IDVP Interfaces ", and willinclude the scheduling of meetings and site visits. DCNPP - IDVP- 008 will be titled "Piping Support Baseplate and Anchor BoltEvaluation (IKE Bulletin 79-02)". Both procedures wil'l be isuedear ly in the next reporting period. The second was reviewed byPGEE to assure consistancy with their 79-02 program, an activityexcluded from the IDVP, and the PGIIE comments received on July 23,1982 will be reconciled before the procedure is issued.

2.2 ~PR P.

2.2.1 Error or 0 en Item Files

The Error or Open Item File System has been developed as a track-ing system for possible technical concerns. The sequence of

~ forms originates with an Open Item Report which is assigned asequential number from the set of such numbers assigned to eachIDVP participant. That file number is used to identify the sub-ject under consideration through several revision numbers untilthe File is closed by issuance of an IDVP Completion Report.

The present status of the EOI Files is described by Appendix 1.During the period covered by the Semimonthly Report, since June25, 1982, a total of five new files have been opened, making atotal to date of 177 files. As of this report, 39 files have notbeen closed or identified as an error. 10 active files have beenidentified as a significant error. (See Table 2 of Appendix 1.)All file actions are reported by the Semimonthly Report issued byeach IDVP participant on the second Friday of each month.

2.2.2 Interim Technical Re orts

Interim Technical Reports are prepared when a program participan'thas completed an aspect of their assigned effort in order to

J;

IDYP-SM-July 1982 -4-

»-TELEDYNEENQlNEERING SERVlCES

provide the completed analysis and conclusions. These may be insupport of an Error, Open Item or Program Resolution Report, insupport of a portion of the work which verifies acceptability, orin support of other IDYP action.

The present status of draft and issued Interim Technical Reportsis described by Appendix 2. During the period covered by thisSemimonthly Report, since June 25, 1982, an ITR on Task (ITR-3)has been issued and an ITR on Shake Table gUalified Equipment(ITR-4) will be issued on July 23rd or soon thereafter. Approxi-mately 25-30 Phase I Interim Technical Reports are anticipated.

2.2.3 Phase I Final Re ort

This report will either include documentation regarding eachError Report identified during Phase I or will summarize the doc-umentatioh and reference the applicable Interim Technical Re-ports.

Preliminary discussions have been held between the IDVP and PGICE

as to the format of the overall PGKE Phase I Final Report includ-ing possible ways of formatting the IDVP Report to serve as anintegral part of the overall report. When the IDVP receives a

suggested overall report outline from PGI|E, the IDVP will preparea specific outline for the IDVP report.

2.3 RLCA Efforts

2.3.1 ~3i 2

The PGEE list of contractors for Diablo Canyon has been completedand the design chain review is nearing completion, RLCA wi 11

prepare an Interim Technical Report on the Design Chain for TES

r evi ew.

2.3:2 ~ii 1 3

a. Buiidin<us

The floor response spectra for the NS and EW Auxiliary Build-ing models have been generated and compared to the HosgriSpectra. A draft report containing both EW and NS results hasbeen forwarded to Professor Holley and TES for review. RLCAmet with TES on June 25, 1982, to discuss the draft report.This report will not address the Fuel Handling Building. Theproperty calculations and frequencies, mode shapes andspectra for the vertical model are being checked.


-»-TELEDYNEENQINEERINQ SERVICES

Refer to 4.1. 2 on .the presentation by the PGIm E/Bechte 1

Pro ject Team of the ir Internal Technical Program effor trelated to the, safety-related buil JingC.

b. ~Pi in

The independent analysis of the ten piping problems iscomplete. RLCA is continuing to establish the reasons forthe differences in stresses between the RLCA and designanalyses.

P S

The initial field walkdowns have been completed. Analysisprocedures are being prepared to reflect the licensingcriteria.

d. Smal.l Bore Pi in

This task has been completed.

e. E ui ment Anal sis

9 Valves

The independent analysis of the one remaining valve inthe initial sample FCV-41 is continuing.

o Electrical Equipment

This task has been completed, and ITR-3 issued.

o Tanks


6 Heat exchanger


e PUmps

The independent analysis of the one remaining pump in theinitial sample, the Component Cooling Water Pump, is con-tinuing.

o HVAC Components

The independent analysis of the HVAC Supply Fan S-31 wascompleted in this work period.

.

IDVP-SM-July 1982

A-TELEDYNEENQiNEERlNQ SERVICES

g ~

E ui meht u8lified b Shake Table Test

This task has been completed, and ITR-4 issued.

Conduit Su orts

RLCA cannot initiate this task prioF tb completion of thePGICE raceway re-evaluation. See the discussion of 4.1.2.

HVAC Duct Supports

The HVAC Duct Support calculations are continuing.

2.3.3 Additional Verification and Additional Sam lin

a ~

b.

c ~

d.

e.

~Buildin s

RLCA has establ i shed a preliminary program plan for thereview of the safety-related buildings. The initiation ofthis task is dependent on PGLE information. These effortswil 1 al so be influenced by the PGIC E Internal TechnicalProgram on buildings as described in 4.1.2.

~Pi in

RLCA has selected the five additional RLCA piping samples.The final walkdowns for three lines was completed on June 24,1982, and the modeling is continuing. The initial fieldveri fication for the fourth line was completed on July 24,1982. RLCA acti on to ver ify both the 79-14 Program and theremote operated valves is dependent on PGRE information.,

Pi e Su orts

RLCA has finalized the first two comparisions with respect toADLPIPE/PIPESD support load differences (Analysis 106). Thethird comparison is continuing.

Small Bore Pi in

The initital field inspection has been compeleted. Theremaining tasks are dependent on PGIIE information.

~Eui ment

0 Electrical Equipment

PGSE has informed RLCA that the main control board wasanalyzed by the NSSS vendor. This additional verifica-tion will be deleted in the next revision to ITR-l.

o

0

IDVP-SM-July 1982 7 w

w TELEDYNEENGlNEERlNQ SERVlCES

o Tanks

The review of the Outdoor Water Storage Tanks and DieselFuel Oil Tanks is continuing.

o Pumps

The review of the two pumps is dependent on request forinformation 214 (6/4/82).

o HVAC Components

RLCA has selected the two additional HVAC Components andcompleted the initial field inspection.

f. E ui NeAt uglified b Shake Table Test

This task is dependent on PG5E information.

g. ~Cd MLS tThe RLCA tasks are dependent on PGKE Conduit re-evaluation.See discussi on of 4.1.2.

h. Soil s

A program for the review of the Harding-Lawson soils work hasbeen finalized. Dr. R. McNeill has completed severalportions of the review and forwarded the results to RLCA forchecking.

RLCA has completed a preliminary review of the "DCM C-17 Revi-sion 1, Hosgri Response Spectra for Structures, Systems andComponents Units 1 and 2, Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant".Results of this review were transmitted to PGEE. In addi-tion, RLCA has reviewed the control log at PGIIE and found DCM

C-17 to be issued in a controlled manner.

2.3.4 Interim Technical Re ort Actions

RLCA has established a functional group within the project toproduce the expected twenty-five Interim Technical Reports. Withthe assistance of the two technical writers retained for thisgroup, a standardized report format has been adopted.

.

IDVP-SM-July 1982

<<-TELEDYNEENQINEERINQ SERVICES

a. Interim Technical Re ort on Additional Ver ification and

Additional Sam lin

ReVisidn 0 oi'TR-1 on Additional Verification and AdditionalSampling w'as issued by RLCA for the IDVP on June 9, 1982. A

draft of Revision 1 is scheduled for issuance to TES on

August 6, 1982.

b. Interim Technical Re ort on Tanks

RLCA issued a report for TES review on July 7, 1982. Revision0 of ITR-3 on Tanks was issued on July 16,1982.

c. Interim Technical Re ort on E ui ment uglified b ShakeTable Testing

RLCA issued a report for TES review on July 14, 1982. Revi-sion 0 of ITR-4 on this subject was issued on July 23, 1982.

d. Interim Technical Re ort on the Auxiliar Buildin

On June 25, 1982, RLCA met with TES and Professor Holley inWaltham, MA to discuss the draft report. RLCA anticipatesissuance of a draft ITR on August 6, 1982.

e. Interim Technical Re ort on the Desi n Chain

RLCA anticipates issuance of a draft ITR for TES review on

July 27, 1982.

f. Interim Technical Re ort on Electrical E ui ment ualified b

~Anal sis

This report is dependent on PGICE action with regards to EOI949-main annunciator cabinet.

2.3.5 EOI File Action

Open Item Reports are included in the RLCA July Semimonthly Report.

2.3.6 Visits and Meetin s

Two field verification trips were conducted during this workperiod, June 24, 1982, and July 14, 1982, to examine piping,Volume Damper 7A, the Fuel Handling Building Steel Frame Joints,Valve FCV-95, EOI 957 and EOI 1045.


-r<-TELEDYNEENQINEERINQ SERVICES

2.4

E. Denison met with W. Cooper, R. Wray, P. Rahu, G. Moy and R.

Foti of TES on June 24, 1982, to dis|.'05s the InChrim TechnicalReport on Tanks, EOI status and piping.

E. Denison and S. Harris of ELCA met with Professors Holley and

Biggs, and R. Wray and R. Ciatto of TES on June 25, 1982; todiscuss the Interim Technical Report on the AUxiliary Building.

E. Denison met with W. Cooper, R. Wray, J. Cragin, R. Boentgen,and J. Tsacoyeanes of TES on June 25, 1982, to discuss schedule,valves, shake table testing and pumps.

M. Barham and D. Aaron of PGEE conducted a guality Assurance Auditat the RLCA offices on June 29, 1982.

P. Brylski of TES accompanied two RLCA engineers at Diablo Canyonon June 24, 1982, and July 14, 1982.

R.F. Reed , Ihc. Efforts

2.5

The gA Audit and Review portion of the currently identifiedsafety-related service contractors involved in design work duringduring the Phase I time period, all presently identified work hasbeen completed .

TES Technical Efforts

2.5.1

2.5.2

2.5.3

PGEE - NSSS Interface

TES will issue an ITR on the PG&E - NSSS interface based on theIDVP audit during the next reporting period.

Containment Annulus Structure

A detailed review of the Brookhaven Study Report on the Unit 1

Containment Annulus Structure and selected Piping Systems is inprogress . The IDVP heard the presentation on July 16, 1982, (see4.1.2) on the earlier Blume design analysis and model for theannulus structure and the current PGKE/Bechtel/Blume work forthis structure. The IDVP and their Civil Structure Consultantwill attent a meeting at Brookhaven on July 27, 1982 to obtainmore information and insight into the Brookhaven Study.

Additional Pi in Verification

TES has received the PGEE documentation for three of the fivepiping models for which TES will perform a design review. A PGRE

3'5


-i< TELEDYNEENGINEERING SERVICES

response to request for information (RF1) numbers 0055, 0056, and0057 has not been received as of this reporting. The designreview effort is in progress.

2.5.4 Interim - Techincal Re ort Acton

TES has reviewed and approved the RLCA's Interim Technical Re-ports (ITR) on the initial tank sample ( ITA-3), and electricalequipment qualified by testing (ITR-4).


TES has issued no Open Items during this period.

3.0 PHASE II PROGRAM

3.1 ~PPP3.1. 1 ~P1

Revision 0 to the Phase II Program Management Plan was trans-mitted for PGhE and NRC approval on June 18, 1982, by TES 5511-50.This plan is responsive to the NRC (Denton) letter to PGIIE

(Furbush) dated November 19, 1981.

3.1.2 En ineerin Pro ram Plan DCNPP-IDVP-PP-002)

This Program Procedure is Appendix D to the Phase II ProgramManagement Plan, and was submitted with that Plan.

3.1.3 Other Pro ram Procedures

Program Procedures, with the exception of those covering the En-gineering Program Plans and the final phase reports, are co@nonto both phases and are reported in 2.1.3 of this SemimonthlyReport.

3.2 ~P

3.2.1 Errors or 0 en Item Files

No EOI Files have been identified to date for Phase II.3.2.2 Interim Technical Re orts

No Interim Technical Reports have yet been issued for Phase II.Approximately 20 Phase II Interim Technical Reports are antici-pated.

.

IDVP-SM-July 1982

><-TELEDYNEENQlNEERlNQ SERVlCES

3.2.3 Phase II Final Re ort

Planning for this report has not yet started.

3.3 SWEC Efforts

3.3.1 ~Di C

The design chains for the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW), Control RoomVentilation. and Pressbrization (CRVP) ~ adtI the 4160V Safety Re-lated Electrical Systems have been completed and are being dis-tributed for IDVP review. These syst4Ns constitute the "SWEC

Sample" as defined in the Project Plan.

3.3.2 Mechanical/Nuclear

The review of the FSAR and other pertinent DCNPP-1 licensingdocuments is in progress. The initial determination and iden-tification of detailed design documents required to perform theverification is complete and the documents have been requestedfrom PGIIE.

a. Auxiliar Feedwater S stem

Approximately 75K of all requested documents for the AFW sys-tem have been received by SWEC. The detailed review of theAFW system, along with the hydraulic modeling of the system,is in progress. The review of the high energy line breaks andcracks, internally generated missiles and fire protection asthey affect the AFW system has coraaenced. To be verified isthe adequacy of AFW pumps, condensate storage tank capacityand piping equipment design.

b. Control Room Ventilation and Pressurization

Approximately 65K of all requested documents for the CRVPsystem have been received by SWEC. The review of the highenergy line breaks and cracks, internally generated missilesand fire protection as they affect the CRVP system has com-menced. Tasks to be performed are: the development of heatloads in the Control Room; the complete review of filtertrain design and the control room radiation and toxic gasconcentrations as a function of system design.

3.3.3 Electrical

Review of the licensing documents is in progress. Preliminaryreview of the one line drawings has been completed. Preliminaryreview of the relay and protective devices and the protectionphilosophy has been completed. Information, including drawings,

'


r<-TELEDYNEENQlNEERiNQ SERV(CES

vendor date and calculations, required for the verification havebeen identified and requested from PGEE.

a. 4160V Safet Related Electrical S stem

To date> approximately 75K of all requested documents havebeen receivhd by SWEC. The tasks to be performed are: reviewof relay and protective device settings; review conformanceof design with licensing cotteitments; develop impedance net-work of 4160V system; calculate eqoipment bils loads; startvoltage profile and short circuit calculations; review dieselgenerator starting and loading capability; identify safety-related electrical equipment subject to the effects ofmissile and high energy line break/ci'acks.

b. Auxiliar Feedwater S stemTo date, approximately 5X of the requested documents havebeen received by SWEC. A preliminary electrical equipmentlist has been developed. The tasks to be performed are:review of relay and protective device settings; review con-formance of design with licensing cormitments identifyelectrical equipment in the system; determine cables andraceway associated with electrical equipment; identifysafety-related electrical equipment subject to the effects ofmissile and high energy line breaks/cracks .

c. Control Room Ventilation and Pressurization S stem

To date, approximately 75K of the requested documents havebeen received by SWEC. A preliminary electrical equipmentlist has been developed. The tasks to be performed are:start review of relay and protective device settings; reviewconformance of design with licensing commitments; identifyelectrical equipment in the system determine cables andraceway associated with electrical equipment; identifysafety-related equipment subject to the effects of missileand high energy line breaks/cracks.

3.3.4 Instrumentation and Controls

The review of the FSAR and other pertinent licensing documents isin progress. Detailed design documents required to perform theverification have been identified and requested from PGICE.

a. Auxiliar Feedwater S stem

To date, approximately 90K of the requested documents havebeen received by SWEC. Preliminary review of design infor-mation has been completed to obtain an understanding of sys-tem operation and control devices. Identification of system


>< TELEDYNEENQINEERINQ SERVICES

safety-related instrumentatiom and controls has been essen-tially completed. The tasks to be performed are: identify

'EC missile and high energy line break/crack targets; reviewavailable Vendor instrument drawings; verify adequacy ofsystem instrumentation and controls.

b. Control Room Ventilation and Pressurization S stem'

Approximate1y gal% of the requested documents have been re-ceived by SWEC. Preliminary review of design information hasbeen completed to obtain an understanding of control systemand identify safety-related instt umentation and controls.The tasks to be performed are: cont>hUe review of licensingand design documents; identify IKC Iishiles and high energyline break/crack targets; determine INC heat loads in controlroom and mechanical equipment room; v'erify adequacy of systeminstrumentation and controls.

3.3.5 ~Anal sis

Review of the FSAR and other pertinent design documents thatdescribe the calculational methods used to determine the temper-ature and pressure transients and submergence for equipment qual-ification outside containment is in progress.

a. Pressure/Tem er ature Environments

A list of 27 documents that are required to perform the inde-pendent design review have been identified, of which 5 docu-ments have been received from PGEE. The nodaliza'tions of theturbine building and the areas designated GE/GW/G for theindependent calculation of the temperature and pressuretransients are in progress.

The calculation of the mass and energy release rates fol-lowing a main steam line rupture for use in the independentcalculation of the temperature and pressure transients is inprogress. The tasks to be performed are: continue review ofthe pertinent design documents; continue development of themodels and the calculation of the mass and energy releaserates for use in the independent calculation of the tempera-ture and pressure transients for equipment qualification.

b. Radiation Environments

Design documents such as job records and drawings have beenreviewed at PGICE's offices in San Francisco.

~ o


<< TELEDYNEENGINEERING SERVICES

RRA in Fort Worth was visited in order to review specific datasuch as source term assumptions and piping data supplied tothem by PGImiEs Specific RRA job records and PGIIE drawings havebeen requested from PGICE.

Preliminary source terms have behn developed for full powercore activities and post-LOCA sump activities.

Layout of geometry for input to SINEW shielding code QADMOD isin progress. A determination of calculation sensitivity tocode differences has been initiated. The tasks to be per-formed are: continue review of pertinent design documents;check source term calculations; develop preliminary calcula-tion sensitivity to code differences; develop preliminarygeometry inputs for QADMOD.

3.3.6 ~Licensin

The specific documents identifying DCNPP-1 licensing coomitmentsare identified. These documents have been requested from PGKE.To date, approximately 15K of the requested documents have beenreceived. In addition, SWEC is pursuing the availability ofspecific licensing documents from the Public Document Room.

3.3.7 Interim Technical Re orts

No action during this reporting period.

3.3.8 EOI File Actions

No action during this reporting period.

3.3. 9 Visits and Meetin s

Meetings were held on July 7, 1982, between TES and SWEC, and onJuly 8, 1982, adding PGICE, to discuss the SWEC schedule. SWECpersonnel visited the site on July 7 and 8, 1982, to determineequipment located in the Control Room envelope for the purpose ofdetermining equipment heat load rejection to the Control Room.

A fact finding site visit is scheduled for August 3,4,8 5, 1982,by SWEC and TES engineers.

3.4 R.F. Reed Inc. Efforts


-s<-TELEDYNEENQlNEERlNQ SERV(CES

3 4 1 O~iCh i

The development of the design chain for the primary safety-related service contractors involved in non-seismic design workperformed prior to June 1, 1978, has been completed. The cur-rently identified contractors are:

quadrex (Nuclear Services Corp.)EDS NuclearGarretson - Elmendorf - Zinov - ReubenPacific Gas 5 Electric (interhal interfaces as

well as interfaces withcontractors.)

Internal design work at Westinghouse was excluded from the PhaseI gA effort since the NRC Order limited verification to seismicservice-related contractors and did not address equipment sup-pliers. A similar exclusion is included in the NRC letter, whichaddresses the Phase II activities. The internal design work doneby Westinghouse for PG&E was done in support of the sale andlicensing of their equipment.

RFR, identified during the development of the design chain fornon-seismic-related service contr actor work performed pr ior toJune 1 1978, Westinghouse contract 5-86-77, Asymmetric ReactorVessel Cavity Analysis. However, since this work was funded bythe Westinghouse PWR Owner's Group and was not unique to theDiablo Canyon license application (eg, it was generic in nature),it will not be subject to Phase II Audit and Review.

In the SWEC development of the design chain for the SWEC sample,an interface was determined to exist between PGIIE and Westing-house. As part of the RFR audit of PGIIE, the design interfacecontrol exercised between PGImE and Westinghouse will beevaluated.

An Interim Technical Report describing the design chain develop-ment has been drafted by RFR and reviewed by TES. The final draftITR is scheduled for submittal to TES during the next reportperiod.

3.4.2 A and Desi n Control Practices Evaluations

The status of the gA Program Review of the contractors is asfol 1 ows:

(i) Completed:

(ii) In Progress:

(iii) To Be Initiated:

Radiation Research Associates

EDS Nuclear

uadrexarretson-Elmendorf-7inov-Reuben

PGKE


>> TELEDYNEENG!NEERlNG SERVlCES

The status of audits of the contractors for the purpose of eval-uating the effectiveness of implementing their QA and Design Con-trol Practices iS as follows;

-(i) Initiated:

Res ul ts:

Radiation Rdhearcli Associates

QA Progrioi was reviewed and foundacceptable; effectiveness of im-plementation of design interfacecontrol between RRA and otherparties is still under evalua-tion.

(ii) To Be Initiated: EDS NuclearQuadrexGarretsonPGRE

3.4.3 A Audit and Review Re orts

The QA Audit and Review Report for Radiation Research Associatesis being drafted in accordance with the Phase II Program Manage-ment Plan.


No EOI action has been initiated by RFR.

3.4e5 Visits and Meetin s

The following visits and meetings were held:

Date

6/30/82

7/13/82

Or anizations

RFRTESPG5E

RFR

EDS

~Pur ose

Update of RFR progress on Phase IIQA Audit and Review activities;clarification of RFR needs andacquisition of informationnecessary for the performance ofRFR activities; estimates onduration of RFR activities.

Clarification of RFR needs andacquisition of information neces-sary for performance of RFR auditand review of EDS.


>>-TELEDYNEENG!NEERINQ SERVlCES

3.5 RLCA Efforts

RLCA has begun researching the licensing requirements pertainingto pipe whip restraints. Development of piping models for PhaseII has been initiated.

3.6 TES Technical Efforts

3.6.1 Interim Technical Re ort Actions

No ITR actions have been initiated during this period.

3.6.2 EOI Fi ld Actions

No EOI file actions have been initiated,

4.0 TES Pro ram Mana ement Efforts

4.1 TES Related

The status with respect to Program Plans and Reports is discussedin 2.1. and 2.2. and 3.1 and 3.2 for Phase I and II respectively.

Other than those actions and the technical actions reports else-where in this Semimonthly Report, the major TES program manage-ment efforts during his report period are described in thefollowing.

4.1.1 Reformattin of Semimonthl Re orts

|I

The month of July 1982, is the first month in which a new reportformat has been followed.

Prior to this month, each of the three individual IDVP partici-pants issued a report on the 2nd and 4th Friday of each month.These reported very briefly on the status of the work of theindividual organization and included the EOI File report issuedduring the report period. The result was a fragmented reportwhich tended to overemphasize the EOI file process . Severalorganizations and individuals expressed their opinion that theformat did not successfully coranunicate or perhaps even representthe progress of the IDVP.

,With the development of the Phase II Plan and the involvement ofyet another organization in the IDVP, TES sought to develop andobtain approval of a more effective format for Semimonthly Re-ports. The present format was so developed, reviewed informallyby TES with PG&E and discussed at the NRC and described at theJune 10, 1982, NRC - PGImE - IDVP meeting. Upon that discussion,the new format was adopted and the Semimonthly Report recipientswere so notified by TES 5511-64. In essence:

~ o


s< TELEDYNEENGINEERINQ SERVICES

4.1.2

a. Each IDVP participant issues a Semimonthly Report on the 2ndFriday of each month which is limited to of all EOI FileReports developed since the last such report.

b. Each IDVP participant, except TES, prepares a report to TES,called the Participant Program Manager's Report, on the 3rdFriday of each month.

c. Based in a large part upon these reports, TES prepares anIDVP (month) Semimonthly Report which is intended to pro-vide an integrated report of the IDVP status.

As stated, this is the first such report anJ reader's coments onthe format and content are requested to help TES in improving thereports. Please recognize, however, that, as with all new ap-proaches, there have been some difficulties. In this particularcase, the short-term difficulties in preparation of this reportwere primarily the result of the meeting described in 4.1.2,although that meeting will have significant positive effects inthe long run. Specifically, the impact of that meet'ing on theIDVP is such that it was decided to rectify the results in thisreport, rather than in the next report where the actions taken inresponse to this meeting would ordinarily be reported. The re-sult has been the inclusion of an additional week's work in thisreport, the rearrangement of priorities to that issue rather thanto the completion of the IDVP schedule which had been intended forinclusion in 5.0, and a delay in distribution of this report.

PGKE Technical Pro ram — IDVP Interface

The PGEE Semimonthly Report has indicated a number of Open Itemswhich are being resolved by the Diablo Canyon Pt oject Team. Simi-larly, that team takes action upon the IDVP Open Items which aretransferred to PGEE (PRR/OIP), because of additional informationwhich must be provided before the IDVP can resolve the file.Progress in all such matters is reflected in the PGEE SemimonthlyReports which are monitored by IDVP particpants for possible im-pact on the IDVP. It has become evident that the PGEE CivilEngineering efforts were reaching a point of significance to theIDVP particularly with regards to approximately 20 files pre-viously transferred to PG5E and to the IDVP, review of the con-tainment annulus region, including the Brookhaven NationalLaboratory Report transmitted to TES by NRC (Denton) on July 1,1982. Therefore, PGEE agreed to present a 'status report of muchof their Civil Engineering efforts to the IDVP on July 14-16,1982.


>s TELEDYNEENGINEERINQ SERVICES

This meeting indicated that PGRE Was making significant progressin their Civil.Engineering efforts. The building sample selectedin the IDVP Phase I Program Plan for independent calculations wasthe Auxiliary Building which includes the Fuel Handling Building.Based upon the independent calculations per'formed to date byRLCA, a number of EOI files have been established with respect tothat structure and the first IDVP Interim Technical Report hasrecoranended additional sampling of building structures. The pre-sentation of the PGEE Technical Program indicated that the levelof requalification being undertaken by PGEE was such that con-tinued comparison of the RLCA analysis with the previous PGEE

analysis was not of significance with respect to evaluation ofDCNPP-1 seismic resistance. Therefore, an Error Report Class Ahas been issued for the Fuel Handling Building. Since it is not.yet definite whether or not physical modifications will be re-quired, Error Reports Class A or 8 will be issued for the Aux-

iliaryy

Building, the Turbine Building and the Conduit Supports.One error report Will be issued for each; and the other associatedEOI files will be closed. In accordance with the Project Plan,the IDVP is requred to verify PG5E Corrective Action taken inresponse to an IDVP file and PG&E may, as their option, requestthe IDVP to review their Correct Action progress at any time.

It is anticipated that similar IDVP actions may be taken withrespect to other EOI files when PGKE is in a position to presenttheir Technical Program to the IDVP.

4.2 RLCA Related

a ~

b.

TES has reviewed and dispositioned a large number of IDVP EOIFiles this period. These files wil,l be attached to the 1stSemimonthly (2nd Friday) for August. See Appendix 1 forcurrent EOI File status.

TES has reviewed, cormented on, and approved two ITR's thisperiod; the 3rd ITR on the RLCA Task Sample and the 4th ITRon Electrical Equipment - gualified by Testing. The in-itial RLCA draft ITR on the Auxiliary Building has beenreviewed and another draft from RLCA is expected in a fewweeks.

Co

d.

The detailed review of RLCA piping models sample and compari-son study of PGEE design analysis results continues. Thiseffort is anticipated to be completed dUring the next re-porting period.

A detailed review of RLCA analyses on the pump sample wasperformed in order to disposition relevant EOI files. Adesign review of the CCW Heat Exchanger analysis is in pro-gress in order to resolve File 1088.

0


-rt-TELEDYNEENQINEERINQ SERVICES

e. TES accompanied RLCA engineers on two site visits and alsomet several times with RLCA to discuss status, technical workand ITR's, see 2.3.6.

4.3 R.F. Reed Inc. Related

TES involvement in RFR activites encompasSed the following ac-tivities:

(i) Review and comment of RFR draft Interim TechnicalReport on development of the design chain forsafety-related service contractors involved in non-seismic design work performed prior to June 1, 1978.

(ii ) Participation in the RFR-PG&E meeting of 6/30/82.I

4.4 SWEC Related

The TES Evaluation Teams have started their review of both theinitial PG&E work relation to DCNPP-1 licensing and the SWEC

review of those earlier efforts.

4.5 . Project Administration

Formal approval via Contract Change Orders has been received fromPG&E for the three major TES subcontractors which with TES, arethe IDVP participants:

Stone & Webster Engineering Co.Boston, MA

Robert L. Cloud Associates, Inc.Berkeley, CA

R. F. Reedy, Inc.Los Gatos, CA

A subcontract is in place with RFR effective July 1, 1982. Finalcontractual details are being worked out with both SWEC and RLCA.

4.6 ualit Assurance Activites

Revision 4 of the TES Program guality Assurance Procedure wasprepared in draft form and sent to PG&E on July 12, 1982, for ap-proval. Approval was received on July 22, 1982, viaDCVP-TES-246. The PgAP defines audit functions which are de-scribed in the following.

~ o


» TELEDYNEENQ|NEERINQ SERVICES

4.6.1 A vendor survey was performed at RLCA for acceptance as anapproved Vendor to TES. The survey was conducted during the weekof May 17, 1982.

4.6.2 RFR was added to the TES Approved Vendor List as a result of a

Vendor Survey and Audit performed during the week of April 12,1982.

4.6.3 A guality Assurance Specification for Consultants was preparedand discussed. This specification appli6s to consultants in-volved in the review of SWEC activities.

4.6.4 A Vendor Audit of SWEC is scheduled for the Seek of July 26, 1982.

4.6.5 A Vendor Survey of General Dynamics Electric Boat Division, Reac-tor Plant Services is scheduled for the week of August 2, 1982.

5.0 IDVP SCHEDULE

TES is establishing a master program schedule including TES andthe other IDVP participants.

Phase I of the IDVP involves for the most part, the efforts ofRLCA, with RFR performing the (}A audit and review. The scheduleline identifications for Phase I are as follows:

1.0 RCLA - Design Chain2.0 RFR - gA Audit and Review3.0 RLCA - Structures, Buildings Im Cranes4.0 RLCA - Piping5.0 RLCA - Pipe Supports6.0 RLCA - Small Bore Piping7.0 Equipment (Analysis)7.1 RLCA - Valves7.2 RLCA - 'Electrical Equipment7.3 RLCA - Tanks7.4 .RLCA - Heat Exchangers7.5 RLCA — Pumps7.6 RLCA - HVAC Components8.0 RLCA - Equipment (Testing)9.0 RLCA - Conduit Supports

10.0 RLCA - HVAC Duct Supports11.0 TES - PGIIE to NSSS Interface12.0 TES - Containment Annulus13.0 TES - Interim Technical Reports14.0 TES - Semimonthly and Phase I Reports

. ~

~ o


-r<-TELEDYNEENQINEERIMQ SERVfCES

The Phase II program involves the combined efforts of RLCA, SWEC,

and RFR .The schedule line identifications for the Phase II Pro-gram are as follows:

1.0 Design Chain1.1 SWEC - For SWEC Samples1.2 RFR - For other Contracts2.0 RFR - gA and Design Control Practitds3.0 Auxiliary Feedwater System3.1 SWEC - Control Division3.2 SWEC - Power Division3.3 SWEC - Electrical Division4.0 Control Room Ventilation and Pressurization4.1 SWEC - Control Division4.2 SWEC - Power Division4.3 SWEC - Electrical Division5.0 SWEC - 4160V Electrical System6.0 SWEC - Radiation Safety Analysis7.0 SWEC - P/T Analysis8.0 RLCA - Sample Selection9.0 RLCA - Piping

10.0 RLCA - Pipe Supports and Rupture Restraints11.0 Equipment Analysis11.1 RLCA - Cooling Coils

. 11.2 RLCA - Condensate Stoppage Tank11.3 RLCA - Pumps11.4 RLCA - Valves/Damper s11.5 RLCA - Electrical Panels and Cabinets11.6 RLCA - Fans11.7 RLCA - Filters12.0 TES - Additional Design Process Sampling13.0 TES - Interim Technical Reports14.0 TES - Semimonthly and Phase II Reports

The above identifications are used for the initial sampling sche-dule. If additional sampling or verification is required, theletter "A" will follow the original number assigned. When two ormore participants are reviewing the same area, the same iden-tification number will be used for each.

Schedule information for these items will be provided in futureSemimonthly Reports as it is developed.

0

":CQ SERVICES

APPENDIÃ 1

IDVP SEMIMONTHLY REPORT FOR JULY

STATUS OF EOI FILES AS OF JULY 23, 1982,

The status is summarized by Table 1. Table 2 summarizes the status of allsix (6) errors identified to date which are, in the opinion of the .IDVP,significant.

The remaining tabIes are printouts from the TES program LISTLOG as describedby Attachment 3 to the IDVP Semimonthly Report for July 1982 (also, seeTable 15).

Table No. 0escri tion

Lists the E OI Files on (which all ID V P work has beencompleted as indicated, by the issuance of an IDVP CompletionR'eport.

Lists all Files which are presently„Error Reports being con-sidered by PG5E. (Also see Tables 12, 13 .and 14.) An IDVPCompletion Report can be issued for Class C Error Files, ifthe IDVP is informed that no modifications will be under-taken in direct response to that File. All others must bereferred back to the IDVP for verification of the correctiveaction and modification. When PG5E informs the IDVP, anOpen Item Report (OIR) will be issued by TES with the sameFile Number and the next higher revision number.

Lists all Files which are presently 0eviation Reports beingreviewed by PG5E to determine if physical modifications wil'lbe undertaken in direct response to that File. If P G 8 E

informs the IDVP that no such modifications will be made,TES will issue an IDVP Completion Report. If PGE E informsthe IDVP that such modifications will be undertaken, an OpenItem Report will be issued by TES with the same File Numberand the next higher revision nuthber'.

Lists Open Item Reports transferred to PGE E because the IDVPrequires additional technical inform ation'efore the IDVPmay resolve the File. When PGhE provides this informationto the IDVP, TES will issue an Open Item Report, with thesame File Number and next higher revision number, and con-tinues with the ID VP resolution of the File.

e.

Descri tion

-r<-TELEDYNEENQINEERIMQ SERVICES

Lists the Files which are presently the responsibility ofTES. In each case, the first letter in the "status" columnis "P" for Potential. That is, TES has received a recom-mended position from one of the IDVP participants and willeither agree with the recommendation (indicated by issuingthe next higher revision with the first "P" in the statussymbol deleted) or disagree with the reco m m endation(indicated by issuing an Open Item R eport with the nexthigher revision number) and sending the item back to theIDVP organization for further study.

Lists the Files which are presently the responsibility ofRLCA. These are all Open Items which RLCA will study andprepN'e a recommendation for TES review and approval.

Reserved for Files which ate the responsibility of RFR; noneat present.

Reserved for Files which are the 'responsibility of SW E C;none at present.

Lists those Files for which PG!hE has Jetermined that modifi-cations will be, or have been, made. Only the last revisionof the File is listed in order that the present status may beindicated. If an IDVP Completion Report has been issued,the IDVP has verified the modification, and the File is alsolisted in Table 3.

Lists all revisions of all Files which, in any revision,have been classified as a Class A Error. The last revisionindicates the present status. If the last revision indi-cates ER/A as the status, the File is also listed in Table 4,

and is under active consideration by P G 8 E. If the lastrevision indicates CR as the status, the IDVP has verifiedthe PG RE corrective .action and the File is also listed inTable 3. If there is a Y ES in the column headed NODS, P 6 5 E

has determined that physical modifications will be, or havebeen, made and the File is also listed in Table 11. If the"STATUS" is other than ER/A or CR, the PG5E correctiveaction is under review by the IDVP, the responsible organi-zation is that indicated under the column headed "ORG" and'the File is also listed in the appropriate table.

Similar to Table 12, but for Class B Error Reports.

Similar to Table 12, but for Class A or Class 8 Error Re-ports.

Defines the nomenclature used in the printouts.

O.f

~ o

w-TELEDYNEENQINEERINQ SERVICES

SM Report for July 1982

Table 1

Present Status of EOI Files

IDVP Action

Open Items:

Potential Program Resolution as:

Closed ItemTransfer to PG &ED eviation

Potential Error, Class:

AB

C

D

20

PG &E Action

Program Resolution as:

Transfer to PG &ED eviation*

Error, Class:

AA/BBC*D*

29

184

IDVP Com letion

Total:

128

175

*IDVP Completion Reports can be issued for these files if PG&Einforms TES that Physical modifications wi11 nnt. h~ ~»»~~

4 r

0

SM Report July 1982

APPENDIX 1

Table 2

The reviews to date haVe resulted in the following conclusions withrespect to errors whet'e, in the opinion of the IDVP, design criteria oroperating limits of safety related equipment are exceeded and physicalmodifications, changes in operating procddUt'8s~ NSFh red)istic calcula-tion's or retesting are required.

STATUS NO IN ERROR CLASS

AOR8

PGE(E ESTABLISHCORRECTI VE ACTION

IDVP VERIFYCORRECTIVE ACTION

CORRECTI VE ACTIONVERIFIED BY IDVP

TOTAL

~ e

0

REV. LATEST REV. ACT IOH

PENDIX 1 TABLE 3 DCttPP IDVP ST*TUS REPORT 26- JUL-82 13121 t 50 PAGE 1

~TELEGVtKHCM<EUCQSBMCESFILE HO o

'910920930931932933934935936937939940

942943944945946947940950951952953954955956957950959'960962965966968969970971972973974975976970979900901902984905

020105020106820105020106020106020120020120020120020120020120020120020120820120820120020120S20120020120020120820120020120020120S20129020129020129020129020129S20129020129020129820129S20129020129020129820129820130020130020130820130020130820130820130820130020205020205020205020205020205020205020205020205

FIDSIDSIDFIDFIDFIDFIDFIDFIDFIDFIDFIDFIDFIDFIBFIBFIDFIDF IDFIDFI9FIDFI9FIDFID09FIDFIDFIDFIDFIDFIDFIDFIDQARQARQARQARQARQARQARQARSIDSIDICD09ICDDHDDHDOD

DATE BASIS REVo

663

4333333333

37333323653

343.2

22

222

3

366

9ATE

02072382072202072302052402051002052402052402040902052402070702070002070S0205240205240~0 ')4020524020524020524820524020~~40 -0701020524S20524820700020708820409020524820723020700820628820524820521020619020524820524020524020524820409S20409820409020409020409020417820621020417820417020511020723020723020417

TESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTES

STATUS

CRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCR=CRCRCRCP.

CRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCR

ORG

HONEHONENONEHOHEHONEHONEHONEHONEttOHEHONEttOHEHOHEHOHEHOHEHOHEHOHEHOHEHOHENONEHONEHONEHONEHOHEHONEt<OHEHOHENONEHONEHOHEHOHEHOttEHOHEHONENONEHOttEHOHEHOttEHONEHONENONEHOttENONEHONEHONEHONEHONEHOHEHONEHONEHOHE

RCMRDCRCMRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFJCTRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDFRDF

RDF'DF

RDFCGSCGSCGSCGSCGSCGSCGSCGSRDCPPRRDCRDCRDCRDCRDCRDC

HOHOHOHOYESHO

HOttOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOYESHOHOHO

HONOHOYESHOHOHO.HONOHOttOHOHO

HOHONOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHO

70000700017000270003700047000570006700077000070009700117001270013700147001570016700177001070019700207002270023700247002570026700277002870029700307003170Q32?GG'347003770038700407004170042700437004470045700467004?700407005070051700527005370054700567005/

TES NODS TASK SUBJECT

R*CFMAY SUPTS.AUX BLDG FLOOR RESP SPECTRA DIFFRACEMAY CRITERIAVALVE 9001A ORIEHTATIOHSUPT+ 50S-23R DIRECT IOH

LIttE 110 DIHENSIOHSUPT o 72-11R DIRECTIONLIHE 931 COHHECTIOH TO LIHE 1971LINE 1971 DIHEHSIONLIHE 44 FLANGESUPPORT 73=72R DIRECTIOHLINE i03 DIHENSIONSUPT. 10-4R DIRECT IOttSUPT 10-7R LOCATIONSUPT 5006/V LOCAT IOHSUPT. 5003/V LOCATIOHSUPT 55S-20R DIRECTION f I.Do ttUKBERLINE 1900 DIHEHSIOHVALVE S021A ORIEHTATIOHSUPT. 13-23SL DIRECT IOHVALVE FCV 95 PLATE THICKNESSSUPT'-2?R LOCATIONSUPTe 3-27V LOCATIOHSUPPORT 58S-69R DIRECTIOHSUPT'8S-56R LOC*TIOHSUPT. 55S-57R IDEHT IFICATIOHSUPT. 58S-69R LOCATIONLIHES 577 1 5?8 IHSULATIOttSUPPORT 50S-55V LOCATIOHSUPPORT 11"49SL LOC*TIOHE'.IHE 19 DIHEHSIOH40-44R DIRECTIOHSUPT 55S LOCATIOHSUPT 14"33SL LOCATIONHARDIHG LAMSOH ASSOC'A FIHDIttGHARDIHG L*MSOH ASSOC o QA F INDIttGHARDING LAMSOH ASSOC. Q* FIND H

EDS HUCLEAR QA OBSERVATIOtiEDS NUCLEAR QA OBSERVATIONEDS HUCLEAR QA OBSERV*TIOHEDS HUCLEAR QA OBSERVATIOttEDS HUCLE*R Q* OBSERVATIOHEXTERIOR CONT. SPECTRA SUPERSEDEDREGEHERATIVE HEAT EXCHANGE SPECTRAOTHER EQUIPS IH CONT HOT RFVIEMEBASUP COHPARTHENTS QUAL. DGCUHEtt; AT lOttBURIED PIPELIttE IS TO AB QUAL.TURB BLDG BLUHE TRAHSKITTALSTURB BLDG INTERFACE t'ROCE9URESAUX BLDG MCIGltTS

APPENDIX 1

REV.

'tABL)„) DCHPP

LATEST REV. ACTION

IDVP STATUS REPORT 26"JUL-82 13:21:58 PAGE 2

&RACESFILE NO.

986987989990991994995996997998999

10001001<00>1G041005100610071010101110121013101510171018101910201023102410251027102910301031'032103310341035103610371038103910401041<04104810 )9105010511052

82020S82020582020S82020582020S82020682020682020682020682020682020682020582020582020582020S820205820205820205820 -0'820209820209820209820211820211820218820218820218820219820220820220820223820225820225820302810302820302820302-8203028203C282030282030282030282C302820302820302820308820308820308820308820309

SIDODDHDDHDDNDODOD

ODOD

ODODODSIDSIDODOD

ODSIDODSIDICDOD

SIDDHDDHDODSIDOD

FIDOD

FIDDHDDHDODFIDQARQARQARQARQRRQARQARQARQRRQARFIDFIDFIDODQAR

6

666

32

22256

1

7

33

3636633752

'<

39332 .-,

820722820417820723820723820723820409820409820510820409820409820409820417820417820o23820o22820 ir8204218204218207238207098204218207238204178207098207138204098206298207178206078207238207238207228207098"0717820707820409820409820409820409820409820 )098204098205248'<AS<4820524820olO820723820708820607820524

DATE BASIS REV. DATE BY

TESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTES<ESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTES.TESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTES

STATUS

CRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCR

ORG TES

HONE RDCHONE RDCHONE RDCHONE RDCHONE RDCHONE RDFHOHE RDFHONE RDFHONE RDFHONE JCTt)ONE JCTHONE JCTHONE RRBHONE CHKHOt)E RRBHONE RRBHOHE CHKHOHE CHKHONE RDCHOHE PPRHONE PPRHONE RRBHOME PPRHONE PPRHONE RCMt)OHE RDFHOHE JCTHONE RDFHOHE RDFHOHE RDFHONE RDCHONE RDCHONE PPRNONE RDFNONE RDFHONE CGSNONE CGSHONE CGSHOHE CGSHOHE'GSHONE CGSt)OHE CGSHOHE CGSHONE CGSHONE CGSHOt)E RDFHONE RRBHONE RDFHONE RDFHONE CGS

HODS

NOHOHOHONaHONOHONONOHOHOHOHONOHONOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHaHONOHOHOHOHO?IOHOHOHOHONONOHOt(OHOHOHOHOHOHONOHOHOHO

TASK

70058700597006170062700637006670067700687006970070700717007270073700747007670077700787007970082700837008470085700877008970110700907009170094700957009670111,701137011470115'0116

701177011870119701207012170122701237012470125701267013470135701367G13?70138

SUBJECT

UNEttTAT ION

104'OH

lo

CONTROL RHo SPECTRAAUX BLDG QUAL DETAILED REVIEWTURB BLDG CRANE REVIEWFH BLDG CRAIIE DESIGN IHFOFH BLDG CRAHE HODIF ICATIOHSPIPIHG COt(SULTRHT INTERFACEEES TRAHSHITTAL COVER S)IEETSBLUHE PIPING CORRESPONDFHCEVALVES TRAHSH<ITTALS TO EESVALVES TRANSNITTALS TO EDSVALVES TRAHSHETTALS TO EDSVALVES TRAHSHITTRLS TO MESTIHGHOUSEVALVES VER IFICATIOH OF ACCELERATIONSSUPPLY FAHS 567< 68 )) 6'9 It)PUTWESTINGHOUSE'OHTAINHEt)T ELEC EQUIPMYLE LRBS TRANSHITTAL OF SPECTRAELEC EQUIP QUAL BY ANALYSISELEC EQUIP. TRAHSHITTAL OF IHFOTURB BLDG ABOVE 140 SPECTRADG OIL PRIHIt)G TANK SPECTRADG OIL PRIHIHG TAt)K 15/ DIFFWYLE LAB SPECTRADG OIL PRIHIHG TANK DRHPIt(GDG OIL PRIHIHG TAHt( SG WEIGHTSUPPLY FAH 8-31 SUPPORT.CVCS SYSTEH SEPARATOR/STABILiZER DOCAUX SALTMATER PUHP PRELIH SPECTRA3'ELAR VALVE DOCUHEHT*TIOt<PIPE SUPPORT HONEHCLATUREVERTICAL SPECTRA FOR TURB BLDG ELEVFUEL )IAI)DLIt)G CRANE SUPPORTAUX BLDG-HODEI DISCREPAI(CI E

RORIC ACID TANK ANALYSESVALVES FCV-37 AHD LCV-115 DOCUHENTATPIPE SUPPORT 73/70R DIRECTIOHEES !CYGHA) QA-OBSERVATIONSEES (CYGNA) QA-OBSERVATIONSEES (CYGHA) QA-OBSERVATIONSEES 'CYGt)A) QA "OBSERVATIOtt=EES (CYGHR) QA-OBSERVATIOHSEES (CYGHA) QA-OBSERVA)'IOIISEES (CYGI)A) QA-OBSERVATIOHSFES (CYGHA) QA-F IHDINGSEF5 (CYGHA) QA"FIHDIt)GSAHCO Q*-FIHDIHGSSUPT. 99/101R LOCRTIONHAIN AHNUHCIRTOR TYPEMRvTER SoECTRALIHE 279 "8 IHSULATIOHIt)SU<.. TION SPEC FOR LINES 264-8 ( 25MYLE LAB QA F IHDIt)G

APPENDIX 1

Table 3 (cont'd)DCHPP IDVP STATUS REPORT 26-JUL-87 13:21258 PAGE 3

REV ~ 0 L( TEST REV. ACT IOH G 2 E

F'ILE HO. DATE BASIS REV. DATE BY STATUS ORG TES NODS TASK SUBJECT

10531054105S105610571061106410651066206710681070107310751076107810791082108?208920901093300030013002300330043005

82O30982030982031082032082032582031582031582031582031S820315820315820315820323820330820330820419820419820422820514820521820521820618820524820524820524820524820S24820524

SIDDHDSIDQARICDODQARQARQARQARQARDHDICDFIDFIDFIBFIDICDICDODODICDQARQARQARQARQARQAR

3

3

231

1

1

1

3'7

3

820709820622820524820524820417820511820524820524820524820524820524820722820708820619820524820713820723820701820623820619820619820722820622820622820622820622820622820622

TESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTES

CRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCR

HONE PPRHONE PPRNONE RDCHONE PPRHONE RDFHONE CHKNONE CGSHOtlE CGSNONE CGSHONE CGSHONE CGSHOtlE RDCtlONE JCTHOHE RDFtlOHE RDFHOHE RRBHONE RDCHONE JCTHONE CHKHOtlE RDFHONE RDFHOHE RDCHONE WECNONE WECNONE WEC

HONE MECtlOtlE MECHONE WEC

HOHOHONOHONOHOHOHOHONOHOHONOHOHOHO

NOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHO

701397014070149701507015170155.7015870159701607016

.'0163

70165701687017070171701?7701787018170190701997020070205701927019370194701957029670197

DIESEL GEH STARTIHG AIR RECEI 'ER TANK DAHPIHGDIESEL GEH START IHGt AIR RECEIVER TANK AtlALYSISCOHTAIHHEHT ANNULUS SPECTRAHO SIGNATURES OH SEVERAL PGKE CALCSoANALYSIS 106 DIFFER FROH THE PG2E ANALYSISHVAC FAN S31 FABRICATIOtl DPM ~

PGIE QA FIHDINGSPGXE QA FIHDItlGSPGltE QA F IHDIHGSURS/DLUHE QA FINDINGSURS/BLUHE QA FIHDIHGSHORIZONTAL SOIL SPRIHG CALC DIFFER BY 50%AUX SALTWATER PUHF'OLT STRESSESSUPTS. 500'7-R I 18-5R DIRECTIOHSUPTS. SSS-3R DIRECTIOHVEHTILATIOH SYSTEH LOGIC PANEL POV2 r POV2AUX BLDG FUEL HAHDLIHG STRUCTUREVALVE." FCV-95 ANALYSISHOT SHUTDOWN REHOTE OHTROL PANELPIPE SUPT 3'/30APIPE SUPT ~ 11/92SAUXILIARY BUILDING- FAH RH 2 VENTILATIOH RHo

HARBIN& LAMSON ASSOC ~ QA REPORTEES (CYGl{A) QA. REPORTANCO QA REPORlWYLE LAB QA REPORTPGIE QA REPORTURS/BLUHE QA REPORT

TOTAL HUHBER OF FILFS LISTED IS 128

REV ~ 0 LATEST REV. ACTIOH

APPENDIX 1

TABLE 4DCHPP IDVP STATUS REPORT

P G 1 E

26-JUL-82 1 1t 10o25 PAGE 1

~TKEltlbiENSNEHINQ SERlhCES

FILE HO. fl*TE BASIS REV. DATE BY STATUS ORG TES ttODS TASK SUBJECT

949963964983

10081026106.1.06910921097

8201208')A i i9S20129S202058202098202208203 1 5820315820820713

ICDFIDFIDSIDODSIDICDFIDFIDSID

1

531

25

55

820421820719820510820421820608S20723820722820630820723820722

TESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTES

ER/ABER/BER/CER/AER/CER/ARER/CER/AER/*ER/AB

POTE CHKPGttE RDFPGRE RDFPGCE CHKPORE CHKPGttE RDCPGSE RDFPGRE RDFPOTE RCW

POTE RDC

700217003570036700557008070097701577016470204

0

ttAIH AHHUttCI*TOR CARIHET RIGIDITY 1 FREON

SUPT 585"32R DIRECTIOttLINE 2519 SUPT IDEHTIFICATIOHRACEWAY SUPT. SPECTRAHAIH ANNUNCIATOR CABINET SPECTRASPECTRA FOR TURB BLDG CLASS 1 ELEC CONDUITRl CA PIPING ANALYSIS 107-STRESS DIFF .

VALVES LCV 113 AHD LCV 1 15 UNSUPPORTED.FUEL HAHDLIHG BUILDIttGAUXILIARY BUILDIHG.

TOTAL HUttBER OF FILES LISTED IS 10

5 jL5

REV ~ 0 LATESI REV. ACT IOH

APPENOIX 1

TABt.E 5DCHPP IDVP STATUS REPORT 26"JUL-82 14'4o34 PAGE 1

%'TEURAKEK~EHPiQ SERVCESFILE HO ~

1072

DATE BASIS

820323 ICD

REV. DATE

820708 TES PRR/DEV PGIE JCT

BY STATUS ORG TES NODS TASK

70167

SUBJECT

TURBIHE DRIVEH AUX FEEDMATER PUNP

TOTAL HUHBER OF FILES LISTED IS 1

O.

0

REVi 0 LATEST REV. ACTION

APPENDIX 1


P G 1 E

26-JUL-82 14: 18:.6 PAGE 1

~vasavmecacaee~~~FILE ttO DATE BASIS REVo DATE BY STATUS ORG TES HODS TASK SUBJECT

0%8961967977988992993

1003100910141016102110221028105810S9

.10941098

8201?082012982G13082020582020582020582020582G205820209820209820211820218820218820223820315820315820705820714

FIDFIBSIDODODODODODODODDHDODSIDDHDDHDDHDODICD

3

2

2

22

22

S

2.

82061982061982041782051182070182070182070182062182041?820417820621820510820510820713820713820621820709820723

TESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTESTES

PRR/OIPPRR/0 IPPRR/OIPPRR/OIPPRR/OIPPRR/OIPPRR/OIPPRR/OIPPRR/OIPPRR/OIPPRR/OIPPRR/OIPPRP/OIPPRR/OIPPRR/OIPPRR/OIPPRR/OIPPRR/OIP

POTE RDFPOTE RDFPGIIE RDCPGRE RDCPGRE RDCPGRE RDCPOTE RDCPGRE CHKP GEE RDCPGIIE RDFPGZE RCWPGRE RDFPOTE JCTPGRE RDCPGXE RCWPGXE RCMPGCE RDCPOTE RDF

7001070033700397004970060700647006570075700817008670088700927009370112?Q 1.5270153

00

VALVE 88058 ORIEHTATIOttSUPT li-59SL DIRECT IOHIHTAKE STRUCTURE ACCELFRATIOHSANHULUS AREA REEVALUATIOttINTAKE STRUCTURE CRAHE REVIEWOD MATER TANK DESIGN INFO.GD MATER TANK DESIGH INFO.4 KV SM RH HVAC DUCT SUPTCOHTAIHMEHT IHTERIOR ABOVE 140 SPECTRACOHTAIHMEHT EXTERIOR PIPE RACKANCHOR ALLOWABLESCCWHX: AttALYSIS AS RIGID AHCHORPOSITIOH OF AUX SALTLIATER PUHP SUPPORTRESROIISE COMB It<AT ION CRITERIA.SHALL BORE PIPING LUG DESIGH.SHACL BORE PIPE REPORT OVERSTRESSINTAKE STRUCTURE SOILS REVIEMRLCA PIPING ANALYSIS 102- SEPARATOR/STABILIZER

TOTAL HUMBER OF FILES LISTED IS 18

REV. 0 LATEST REVo ACT IOH

APPENDIX 1


P G 4 E

26-JUL-82 14:22'4 PAGE 1

el'1ELIHNNE~SERN BSFILE HO. BASIS REVs DATE STATUS ORG TES HODS TASK SUBJECT

10431044104510461071107410771084108510881096

8 0308820306820308820308820323820323820406820514820514820514820709

FIDF IDFIDFID

-ICDICDICDICDICDICDICD

4

421

31

1

1

1

820717820717820717820717820710820618820622820719820721820618820713

RLCARLCARLCARLCARLCARLCARLCARLCARLCARLCARLCA

PPRR/DEVPPRR/CIO'PRR/DEVPPRR/DEVPER/CPER/CPPRR/OIPPER/CPER/CPER/APER/A

TEE RCMTco RCMTES RCWTES RCW

TES RDFTES RDFTES CHKTES RDFTES RDFTES PPRTES CHK

70129701307013170132701667016970173701877018870191

0

PIPE SUPr ORTS 512/7R tt I /6R LOCALIOH

SHALL BORE LI HES LOCATIOttSUPPORT 9'9/9R DIRECTIOHSUPPORTS 99/7R 1 99/9R DIHEHSIOltoRLCA PIPING AttALYSIS 109 OVERSTRESSRLCA PIPIHG AHALYSIS 101 STRESS DIFFHVAC DUCT SUPTRLCA PIPIttG AHALYSIS 102 STRESS DIFF ~

RLCA oIPIHG AHALYSIS 105 STRESS DIFF.COHPOHEHT CLG WATER HEAT EXCHAttGERSUPPLY FAH S-31

TOTAL HUHBER OF FILES LISTED IS 11*

e.

REVe 0 LATEST RE'V. ACTIOH

APPENDIX 1

TABLE 8DCHPP IDVP STATUS REPORT 26-JUL-82 14:25:39 PAGE

1elREPe NQQIESNQ SEM~FILE HO.

104710601062108010811083108610911095

DATE

820308820315820315820422820422820422820514820521820709

BASIS

FIBICDICDICDICDFIDICDr

I CirD

301

00

030

820708820315820430820422820422820708820514820709820709

REV. DATE

TESRLCARLC*RLCARLCATESRLCATESRLCA

OI..OIROIRQIROIROIROIROIROIR

BY STATUS ORG

RLCARLCARLCARLCARLCARLCARLC*RLCARLCA

TES

RCWRDFRDFRDFRDFCHKRDFRDCRDC

NODS TASK

7013370154701567017970180701827018970201

0

SUBJECT

SHALL BORE " INES LOCATIONPIPESD AHD ADLPIPE CODESRLC* PIPIHG ANALYSIS 100-STRESS DIFF.RLCA PIPING AHALYSIS 103 STRESS DIFFRLCA PIPING ANALYSIS 104 STRESS DIFF.HVAC VOLUHE DAHPER 7ARLCA PIPIHG AHALYSIS 108 STRESS DIFFAUXILIARY BLDG - FUEL H*HDLIHG BLDGIHPUT TINE-HISTORY.


.

APPENDIX 1

TABLE 9

This Page intentionally Left Blank

No RFR Files at Present

APPENDIX 1

TABLE 10

This Page intentionally Left Blank

No SllEC Files at Present

0

REV. 0 LATEST REV. ACTION

APPENDIX lTABLE ll

DCHPP IDVP STATUS REPORT

PGRE26-JUL-82 14:28:45 PAGE

~TEUHÃbKENKKERKQSERVCIESFILE HO ~ DATE BASIS REV. DATF. BY STATUS ORG TES NODS TASK SUBJECT

932. 950

'957

820106820128820129

FIBFIDFID

676

820510820701820723

TES CRTES CRTES CR

HOHE RDFHONE JCTHONE RDF

YES 70004 SUPT. 58S-23R DIRECTIONYES 70022 VALVE FCV 95 PLATE THICKNESSYES 70029'INES 577 L 578 IHSULATIOH


~ o

APPENDIX 1

TABLE 12DCHPP IDVP STATUS REPORT 26-JUL-82 14'32l21 PAGE 1

REV. 0 LATEST REV. ACTION P G C E

FILE HO ~ DATE BASIS REV. DATE BY STATUS ORG TES NODS TASK SUBJECT

9329329329329329329'7 9

820106820106820106820106820106820106820106

FIDFIDFIDFIDFIDFIDFID

01

23456

820106820319820417820417820430820510820510

RLCA OIRRLCA PER/ATES ER/ATES OIRRLCA PPRR/CITES PRR/CITES CR

RLC* RDFTLS RDFPOTE RDFRLCA RDFTES RDFTES RDFHONE RDF

YESYESYESYES

70004700047000470004700047000470004

SUPT. 585-23RSUPT'8S-23RSUPT+ 58S-23RSUPT'8S-23RSUPT. 58S-23RSUPT. 58S-23RSUPT'8S-23R

DIRECTIONDIRECTIONDIRECTIONDIRECTIONDIRECTIONDIRECT IOH

983106910691069106910691069

820315820315820315820315820315820315

FIDFIDFIDFIDFIDFID

820205 SID820315820426820511820517820607820630

RLCA OIRRLCA PPRR/CITES OIRRLCA PER/ATES ER/ATES ER/A

RLCA RDFTES RDFRLCA RDFTES RDFPGEE RDFPOTE RDF

A P R/* TES CHh820421 TES ER/* PGRE CNK

7005570055701647016470164701647016470164

RACEMAY SUPT+ SP CTRARAC MAY SUPT. SPECTRAVALVES LCV 113 AHD LCV 115VALVES LCV 113 AHD LCV 115VALVES LCV 113 AHD LCV 115VALVES LCV 113 AHD LC'V 115VALVES LCV 113 AHD LCV 115VALVES LCV 113 AHD l CV 115

UHSUPToUNSUPPORTEDUHSUPPORTEDUHSUPPORTEDUNSUPPORTEDUNSUPPORTED

109210921092i.0921092-1092

820611820611820611820611820611820611

FIDFIDFIDFIDFIDFID

820611820611820621820720820721820723

RLCA OIR RLCA RCM

RLCA PPRR/OIP TES RCW

TES PRR/OIP PGRE RCM

TES OIR RLCA RCM

RLCA PER/* TES RCMTES ER/A PGllE RCW

702047020470204702047020470204

FUEL HAHDLIHG BLDGFUEL HAHDLIHG BLDGFUEL HANDLING BUILDIHGFUEL. HANDLING'UIt.DIHGFUEL HAHDLIH&BUILDINGFUE AHD NG BUILD

TOTAL NUHBER OF FILES LISTED IS 21

O.

~ o

REV. 0 LATEST REV. ACTIOH

APPENDIX 1


P G 1 E

26-JUL-82 }4o38:09 PAGE 1

mlELHIYIEENGNWtNQ&mo'ESFILE HO. DATE BASIS REVo DATE BY STATUS ORG TES NODS TASK SUBJECT

963963963963963

820129820129820129820129820129

01>9

FIDFIDFIDFIDFID

01

34

820129820316820510820709820713

RLCARLCARLCATESRLCA

OIROIRPER/COIRPER/B

RLCA RDFRLCA RDFTES RDFRLCA RDFTES RDF

700357003570035700357003$70035

SUP: 58S-32R DIRECTIOHSUPT 58S-32R DIRECTIOHSUPT'8S-32R DIRECTIONSUPT 58S-32R DIRECTIONSUPT 588"32R DIRECTIOHSUPT 58S-32R DIRECTIOH

10021002100210021002

0 210131013101310131013101310131013

820205820205820205820205820205820205820209820209820209820209820209820209820209820209

SIDSIDSIDSIDSID

InOD

ODODOD

ODODODOD

01

2345

.67

820209820527820603820610820723820723820723820723

0 820205820417

2 8204173 8205214 .8206235

RLCA PER/BTES ER/BTES OIRRLCA PPRR/CITES PRR/CI

ES CRRLCA 0IRRLCA PER/BRLCA PER/BTES ER/BTES OIRRLCA PPRR/CITES PRR/CITES CR

TES CHKPOTE CHKRLCA CHKTES CHKTES CHK

RLCA RRBTES RRBTES RRBPGSE RRBRLCA RRBTES RRBTES RRBNONE RRB

7007470074

HO 70074NO 70074HO 70074

70074

SUPPLY FANS S67tSUPPLY FANS S67iSUPPLY FANS 567iSUPPLY FANS S67tSUPPLY FAHS S67rS PLY FANS S67i

HOHONO

70085'YLE LAB SPECTRA70085. MYLE LAB SPECTRA70085'YLE LAB SPECTRA70085'YLE LAB SPECTRA70085 MYLE LAB SPECTRA70085 MYLE LAB SPECTRA0085- MYLE LAB SPECTRA

7008K, MYLE LAB SPECTRA

68t I 69 IHPUT68~ 1 69 INPUT68i i 69 IHPUT68t 1 69 IHPUT68 ' 69 INPUT68 8 69 INPUT

TOTAL HUNBER OF FILES LISTED IS 20

0

FILE HOo

REVo 0 LATEST REV. ACTION

BATE BASIS REV. DATE BY STATUS ORG TES

APPENDIX 1

TABLE 14

DCHPP IDVP STATUS REPORT

P G f E

iODS rASi SUBJECT

26-JUL-82 . f4:41131 PAGE 1

~7EIEOINE~ SEIMCBt

949949

10261026102610261026

10971097109710971097

820220820220820220-8202208 0220820220

SIDSIDSIDSIDSIDSID

01

2345

820713820713820713820713820713

SID 0SID 1

SIDSID 3SID '4

820120 ICD> ~ "0 ICD

8201208 0421

RLCA PER/ABT

TES CHK

820220820319820417820720820721820723

RLCARLC*TESTESRLCATES

OIRPPRR/DEVPRR/OIPOIRPER/AB

R/AB

RLCA RDCTES RDCPGKE RDCRLCA RDCTES RDCP C

820713 RLCA OIR RLCA RDC820714 RLCA PPRR/0IP TES RDC820720 - TES OIR RLCA RDC820721 RLCA PER/AB TES RDC820722 TES ER/AB PGCE RDC

700217 021700977009770097700.977009770097

SPECTRA FOR TURBSPECTRA FOR TURBSPECTRA FOR TURBSPECTRA FOR TURBSPECTRA FOR TURBSPECTRA FOR TURB

BLDG CLASS 1 ELEC CONDUITBLDG CLASS I ELEC CONDUITBLDG CLASS 1 ELEC COHDUITBLDG CLASS 1 ELEC COHDUITBLDG CLASS 1 ELEC CONDUITBLDG CLASS 1 ELEC CONDUIT

0 AUXILIARY BUILDING~

0 AUXILIARYBUILDING.0 AUXILIARY BUILDING.0 AUXILIARY BUILDINGo

0 AUXILIARY BUILDING.

HAIN ANNUNCIATOR CABIHET RlGIDITY f EREQoHAIH H ATOR CART R GIDITY f FRcj}.


P.

ENDIX 1

Table 15

r< TELEDYNEENQlNEERlNQ SERVlCES

Nomenclature Used in Printouts

FIELD

FILE NO

REV. 0DATE

REV. 0BASIS

LATEST REV.REV.

LATEST REV.DATE

LATEST REV.BY

DESCRIPTION

File number assigned to the item in the OPEN

ITEM REPORT by the IDVP participants

Date of the OPEN ITEM REPORT in internationaldate format (laht two digits of year,numerical identification of month, numericalidentification of day)

Abbreviation of Nhat the Open Item resultedfrom:

FID = field inspection deficiencyQAR = Quality Assurance audit and reviewICD = independent calculation deficiencyDMD = design methodology deficiencySID = seismic input deficiencyOD = other deficiency (explanation

should be entered in the COMMENT

field)PGE = responsive to PGIIE Technical Prog-

ram Action

Revision of report-type from which input datais being taken; see description of STATUSfield.

Revision date (in intei'national date format)of report-type from which input data is beingtaken; see description of STATUS field.

Note: If this is Rev. 0 the program willautomatically enter theinformation provided under theRev. 0 field.

Abbreviation for organization submitting thereport:

TES =

RLCA=RFR =

SWEC=

PG&E=BPC =

Teledyne Engineering ServicesR. L. Cloud AssociatesR. F. Reedy AssociatesStone and Webster EngineeringCorp.Pacific Gas and ElectricBe'chtel Power Corp.

LATEST REV.STATUS

Type of repor t/qualifier:

'ppendix 1

Table 15 (cont'd)

><-TELEDYNEENQINEERINQ SERVICES

T e of Re orts

OIR =

PPRR=

PRR =

PER =

ER

CR

NCR =

Open Item ReportPotential Program ResolutionReportProgram Resolution ReportPotential ERROR ReportError ReportCompletion ReportAll reports which are not CR's

T es of ualifiers

CI = Closed ItemDEV = DeviationOIP = Open Item with future action by

PG5EA = Class A ErrorB = Class B ErrorC = Class C Error0 = Class 0 Error

Note: (1) CI, OIR, CR are enteredwithout report type (for CI) orqualifier (for OIR or CR)

(2) If ER is entered without anyqualifiers, all error classes willbe listed.

ACTIONORG

ACTIONTES

PGREMODS

PGEiE

TASK

SUBJECT

COMMENTS

Organization where current responsibility foraction is; same. abbreviations as used forentrees in LATEST REV. by field. Enter NONEif item is. closed.

Person responsible within TES for monitoringaction

Indication if modifications will be performedby PGKE

PGKE Task Number which corresponds to FILENUMBER

Description of item.

Any applicable coments which apply to therevision being entered.

Note: If desired, the COMMENTS can beomitted from any hard copylisting.

~ o

PFTELEDYNEENQ!NEERINQ SERVlCES

APPENDIX 2

IDVP SEMIMONTHLY REPORT FOR JULY

ITR STATUS as of Jul 23 1982

The tables included in this attach m ent detail the status ofInterim Technical Reports identified by the ID VP to date.

Tables 1 and 2 are printouts from the TES computer program LISTITR,as described by Attachment 3 to the IDVP SemiMonthly Report for July1982.

TABLE NO. DES C RIP TIO N

Lists the ITR's issued to date; atld the status of anyrevisions to those docum ents.

Lists ITR's which have been scheduled and their present status.

Defines the nomenclature used in the printouts.

ITR REVISION

APPENDIX 2TABLE 1

DCHPP IDVP ITR STATUS REPORT

ACTION DRAFT

26"JUL-82 14l50:07 PAGE 1

~TELED'AKENCC8KRRQ.'KWCESFILE HO.

1

COMHEHT:

HO. DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF HO. SUBJECT

0 820609 RLCA ISSUED HONE RW 101 ADDITIONAL VERIFICATIOH AHD ADDITIOHAL SAHPLIHGPROGRAM DOCUHEHT DEFIHIHG WORK BEYOND INITIAL SAHPLE DEFINEDBY PROGRAH PLAN. SUBJECT TO REVISIOtt AS WORK PROCEEDS.

ITR

FILE HO+

1

COHMENTt

REVISIOH

HOo DATE BY STATUS

1 820806 RLCA DRAFTSCHEDULED DRAFT REVISIOH.

ACT IOH DRAFT

ORG TES REF HOr SUBJECT

RLCA RW 101 ADDITIOHAL VERIFICATIOtt AHD *DDITIOHAL SAHPLIHG

ITR REVISION ACT IOH DRAFT

FILE HO o

2COHHEHTI

ITR

FILE HO.

HO. DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF HO+ SUBJECT

0 820623 TES ISSUED HOHE WEC 116 QUALITY ASSURAHCE PROGRAH AHD IHPLEHEHTATIOH REV EW

REVIEW AHD EVALUATIOH OF RFR PHASE 1 WORK ~ SUMMARIZES PURPOSESr DEFINESTES REVIEW HETHODr EVALUATES WORK RELATIVE TO HRC ORDER AHD RELATIVETO PLAHHED ADDITIOHAL VERIFICATIOH.

REVISION ACTION

HO. DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF HO SUBJECT

T 0 820716 RLCA ISSUED NONE PPR 106 EVALUATIOH OF IHITIAL TANK SAMPLECOHMEHT: INCLUDES COttSIDERATIOH OF EOI FILES 1011r1012r1015r1017r 1030 1053r1054.

ITR REVISION ACTION DRAFT

FILE HO. HO+ DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF HO. SUBJECT

4 0 820723 RLCA ISSUED HOHF RRB 114COHHEHT: IHCLUDES COHSIDERATIOH OF EOI FILES 1005r 1007r 1013r 1049.

E'VALUATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMEHT QUALIFIED BY TEST

TOTAL NUMBER OF FILES LISTED IS 5

e.

DRAFT REVISIOH

APPENDIX 2TAHLE 2

DCHPP IDVP DRAFT STATUS REPORT

ACT IOH ITR

26-JUL-82 14:52',06 PAGE 1

~%KENO% EL%S~R'8SEN/CBSFILE HO ~ HOa'ATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF HO. SUBJECT

10110210310410510&107

-108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127201202203

300001

0000000

01

00000000000000

820610820806

000

8207160000000

820723820727820623

000000000

8208200

82082000

RLCARLCARLCARLCA

- RLCARLCARLCARLCARLC*RLCARLCARLCARLCARLC*RLC*TESTESRLCARLCARLCA:RLCARLC*RLCARLCARLCATESTESRFRSMECTES

ISSUED

ISSUED

ISSUED

ISSUED

t<OHE RM

RLCA RDCRLCA RDFRLCA JFNRLCA RCMHONE PPRRLCA PPRRLCA JCTRLCA JCTRLCA CHKRLCA CHKRLCA CHKRLCA CHKHONE RRBRLCA RMHONE WEC

TES RDFRLCA RDCRLCA RDFRLCA RCWRLCA CHKRLCA PPRRLCA JCTRLCA CHKRLCA RRBTES RMTES RDCRFR NARSMEC LCHTES t!AR

1

000030000000

0200000000000000

PHASE I ADDITIONAL VERIFICATIOH AHD ADDITIOHAL SAMPL

AUXILIARY BU ILDIHG EVALUATIOH

PIPING INITIAL SANPLE EVALUATIOHPIPING SUPPORT EVALUATIONSHALL BORE PIPIHG IHITIAL SANPLE EVALUATIONEVALUATIOH OF INITIAL TANK SANPLFCCM HEAT EXCHANGER EVALUATIONVALVE SANPLE EVALUATION (TO IHCLUDE 2 SAMPLES)IHITIAL PUttP SAttPLE EVALUATIONIHITIAL ELECTRICAL EQUIPNEHT SANPLE EVALUATIONIHITIAL HVAC COMPONENT SAMPLE EVALUATIOHEVALUATIOH OF CONDUIT AHD RACEWAY SUPPORTSEVALUATIOH OF HVAC DUCT SUPPORTSEVALUATIOtt OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPNEHT QUALIFIED BY SHAti

SEISttIC DESIGN CHAIN STUDYQUALITY ASSURAHCE PROGRAN AHD INPLENEHTATIOH REVIEMTES PIPIHG DESIGN REVIEW EVALUATIOHADDITIONAL VERIFZCATZOH — BUILDIHGADDITIONAL PIPING SANPLE EVALUATIONADDITIONAL VERZfICATION EVALUATION-SHALLBORE PIPINGADDZTIOHAL VERIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPNEHTADDITIONALVERIFICATION OF TANKSADDITIONAL VERIFICATIOH OF PUNPSADDITIONAL HVAC CONPOHEHT SANPLE EVALUATIOHADDITIONAL VERIFICATIOH OF TEST QUALIFIED TEST EQUIP

PGfE HSSS SEIStiIC INTERFACECOHTAINNEHT ANNULUS STRUCTUREDESIGN CHAIH-HOH SEISNIC PRIOR TO 7806DES IGH CHAIN- SWEC SAttPLESQA AND DESIGN CONTROL EVALUATIOH

TOTAL NUMBER OF FILES LISTED 30

e.

~ o

APPENDIX2Table 3

<< TELEDYNEENQINEERINQ SERVICES

Nomenclature Used in Printauts

FIELD

FILE NO

DESCRIPTION

Numbers assigned to each ITR. All Phase IDraft ITR's are numbered sequentially beginn-ing with 101. All Phase II Draft ITR's beginwith 201. Issued Reports are assigned seque-ntial numbers 1 - 99.

REV. NO The definition of the designations for DraftITR's are as follows:

IIOII

II] II

II2 II

Used for scheduling purposesIndichtes written material underrevieWMajot revisions made to the text

An asending number indicates aredraft of text, as opposed toreview comments.

The designations for Issued ITR's are asfollows:

I I0 II

II] IIIndicates Revision 0 of the ReportIndicates the Stage of draft, asabove when "DRAFT" appears in . theRevision Status Column.Indicates the Revision number ofthe report when "ISSUED" appearsin the Revision Status Column.

REV DATE

REV. BY

REV. STATUS

And ascending numbers as needed

Date, in international format on which theinput data is being taken.

The abbreviation for the organization submit-ing the report:

TES = Teledyne Engineering ServicesRLCA= R. L. Cloud, AssociatesRFR = R. F. Reedy, AssociatesSWEC= Stone and Webster Engineering

Corp.

Status Designated as either "Draft" or"Issued"

O.

~ o

Appendix 2

Table 3 (Cont'd)>> TELEDYNE

ENQINEERIMQ SERVICES

FIELD

ACTION ORG

ACTION TES

DESCRIPTION

Organization where current responsibility for-action lies.

Individual within TES responsible for moni-toring necessary action.

ITR REF. NO.

SUBJECT

COMMENTS

For cross reference purposes. For DraftITR's in process a "0" will appear. Once anITR has been issued, the Draft repor t willdesignate the Issued File No. The IssuedReport will designate its Draft File No.

Description of item

Any applicable coakdnts Qhich apply to therevision being entered.

Note: If desired, the COMMENTS may beomitted from any hard copylisting.

~.

><-TEI ED''NEENQlNEERlNQ SERVlCES

APPENDIX 3

DESCRIPTION OF

COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR ERROR AND OPEN ITEM REPORTS

AND INTERIM TECHNICAL REPORT TRACKING SYSTEM

General

To facilitate the records management for the Diablo Canyon Independent

Design Verification Program, three versatile data-base-management computer

programs, entitled LISTLOG, LISTFILE, and LISTITR have been -developed and

implemented on the VAX. Programmed in Fortran, these enable TES to

maintain up-to-date records on all files, active and inactive, and

Technical ReportS, draft and issued. All can be readily accessed by

project personnel thru any of the VAX terminals located throughout the TES

Waltham office. LISTFILE is 'an accelerated ver sion of LISTLOG which

provides the user with a listing of only the latest revision of any

specific file. At the same time, access to the main data base file for the

purpose of editing the data is restricted to only key program personnel by

means of internally progr ammed security checks. LISTITR is a modified,

version of LISTLOG used to identify, schedule and track Interim Technical

Reports throughout the IDVP participants. Program personnel have the

capability of manipulating the data files in such a manner as to detect any

possible trends that could be developing, as well as obtaining a complete

history of any file. The following paragraphs provide a more 'detailed

description of LISTLOG, LISTFILE, and LISTITR its data fields and itscapabilities.Fields Descri tion for'ISTLOG and LISTFILE

Since the work scope of the Diablo Canyon Design Verification Program

encompasses both the involvement of the Independent Verfication Program pa-,

rticipants and Pacific Gas 8 Electric, the data fields for LISTLOG have

been establihed to facilitate tracking of all IDVP findings using the filenumbering system of either the IDVP or of the PGIIE Technical Program. The

following listing describes the fields and defines the subject matter

entered in each. The format of the field data printout is as depicted inAttachment (A).

~.

-r<-TELEDYNEENQlNEERlNG SERVlCES

FIELD

FILE NO

REV. 0DATE

REV. 0BASIS

DESCRIPTION

File number assigtied to the item in the OPEN

ITEM REPORT by the IDVP participants

Date of the OPEN ITEM REPORT in internationaldate format ( last two digits of year,numerical identification of month, numericalidentification of day)

Abbreviation of what the Open Item resultedfrom:

FID =

JAR =

ICD =

DMD =

SID =

OD

PGE =

field inspection deficiencyguality Assurance audit and reviewindependent calculation deficiencydesign methodology deficiencyseismic input deficiencyother deficiency (explanationshould be entered in the COMMENT

field)responsive to PGKE Technical Prog-ram Action

LATEST REV.REV.

LATEST REV.DATE

LATEST REV.BY

Revision of report-ape from which input datais being taken; see description of STATUSfield.

Revision date (in international date format)of report-type from which input data is beingtaken; see description of STATUS field.

Note: If this is Rev. 0 the program willautomatically enter theinformation provided under theRev. 0 field.

Abbreviation for organization submitting thereport:

TES =

RLCA-"

RFR =

SWEC=

PGLE=BPC =

Teledyne Engineer ing ServicesR. L. Cloud AssociatesR. F. Reedy AssociatesStone and Webster EngineeringCorpPacific Gas and ElectricBechtel Power Corp.

LATEST REV.STATUS

Type of report/qualifier:

~if R

OIR = Open Item ReportPPRR= Potential Program Resolution

ReportPRR = Program Resolution ReportPER = Potential ERROR Report

~s-TELEDYNEENGINEER(NQ SERVlCES

ER = Error RapportCR = Completion ReportNCR = All reports which are not CR's

T es of ualifiers

CI = Closed ItemDEV = DeviationOIP = Open Item with future action by

PGRE

A = Class A Error8 = Class B ErrorC = Class C ErrorD = Cl ass D Er ror

Note: (1) CI, OIR, CR are enteredwithout report type (for CI) orqualifier (for OIR or CR)

(2) If ER is entered without anyqualifiers, all error classes willbe listed.

ACTIONORG

ACTIONTES

PG5EMODS

PGKE

TASK

SUBJECT

COMMENTS

Organization where current responsibility foraction is; same abbreviations as used forentrees in LATEST REV. by field. Enter NONEif item is closed.

Person responsible within TES for monitoringaction

Indication if modifications will be performedby PGIIE

PGIIE Task Number which corresponds to FILENUMBER

Description of item.

Any applicable comments which apply to therevision being entered.

Note: If desired, the COMMENTS can beomitted from any hard copylisting.

s

>> TELEDYNEENQINEERINQ SERVICES

Field Descri tion for LISTITR

Through the use of this system, any ITR can be scheduled and assigned

to the appropriate organization, tracked through its draft stages, and rec-orded once it has been issued, including subsequent revisions. The follow-ing listing describes the fields and defines the subject matter entered ineach. The format of the field data printout is depicted in Attachment (B).

FIELD

FILE NO

DESCRIPTION

Numbers assigned tb eaCh ITR. All Phase IDraft ITR's are numbered sequentially beginn-ing with 101. All Phase II Draft ITR's beginwith 201. Issued Reports are assigned seque-ntial numbers 1 - 99.

REV. NO The definition of the designations for DraftITR's are as follows:

I I0 II

II11I

II2 II

Used for scheduling purposesIndicates written material underreviewMajor revisions made to the text

An asending number indicates aredraft of text, as opposed toreview comments.

The designations for Issued ITR's are asfollows:

I I0 II

II] IIIndicatds Revision 0 of the ReportIndicates the Stage of draft, asabove when "DRAFT" appears in theRevision Status Column.Indicates the Revision number ofthe report when "ISSUED" appearsin the Revision Status Column.

REV DATE

And ascending numbers as needed

Date, in international format on which theinput data is being taken.

e.

~ o

A TELEDYNEENGINEERINQ SERVICES

REV. BY

REV. STATUS

ACTION ORG

ACTION TES

The abbreviation for the organization submit-ing the report:

TES = Teledyne Engineering ServicesRLCA= R. L. Cloud, AssociatesRFR = R. F. Reedy, AssociatesSWEC= Stone and Webster Engineering

Corp.

Status Designated as either "Draft" or"Issued"

Organization where current responsibility foraction lies.

Individual withi'n TES responsible for moni-toring necessary aCtion.

FIELD

ITR REF. NO.

SUBJECT

COMMENTS

DESCRIPTION

For cross reference purposes. For DraftITR's in process a "0" will appear. Once anITR has been issued, the Draft report willdesignate the Issued File No. The IssuedReport will designate its Draft File No.

Description of item

Any applicable comments which apply to therevision being entered.

Note: If desired, the COMMENTS may beomitted from any hard copylisting.

>< TELEDYNEENQINEERINQ SERVICES

Ca abilities

As a data-base management tool, these programs provide the user with

capabilities such as:

Listing all revisions of all or specific files for the purpose of

acquiring a complete history;

Listing only latest revisions of all or specific files for the

purpose of acquiring a status report;

Listing files with specific characteristics for the purpose ofdetermining a trend or a possible hold-up point for scheduling

purposes;

Listing of ITR's according to the organization of origin;

Providing a hard copy printout of any information requested in a

format that is directly input into the Various status reportsthat the project requires.

With the program on the VAX system, access to the files is unhampered

and fast. For user ease, all programs prompt the user with interrogatorystatements, ensuring that all data, fields are co'nsidered.

The hardcopy output from the program will be utilized as Appendices 1

2 to the IDYP Semimonthly Reports, issued by Teledyne Engineering

Services.

~ .

~ o

0

Documents

TELEDYNE ENQINEERlNQ SERVICES · 2017. 3. 24. · ~