10
Venla Vuorjoki LET – Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit University of Oulu 2013-04-04 TEL1 2013-04-04 Constructing the learning environment for your TEL course

Tel1 2013 04-04

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Tel1 2013 04-04

Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04

TEL12013-04-04

Constructing the learning

environment for your TEL course

Page 2: Tel1 2013 04-04

Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04

2013-01-31Thursday08:15-14:00KTK205 + KTK112

2013-02-14Thursday08:15-14:00KTK303 + KTK140

2013-02-28Thursday08:15-11:30KTK303 + KTK140

2013-03-01Friday08:15-15:45KTK215

2013-03-14Thursday08:15-14:00KTK112

2013-03-15Friday08:15-15:45KTK303

2013-04-04Thursday08:15-11:30KTK215

2013-04-18Thursday08:15-11:30HU108

Course info, lectures and collaborative studying

Lectures and collaborative studying

Lectures and collaborative studying

Problem-Based Learning (PBL)

Lectures and collaborative studying

Problem-Based Learning (PBL)

Lectures and collaborative studying

Collaborative studying and ending the course

GATHERING IDEAS

PEDAGOGICAL SCRIPTING

TECHNOLOGICAL SCRIPTING

CONSTRUCTING THE COURSE ENVIRONMENT

OUTCOME:A TEL

COURSE DESIGNED BY

YOU

Page 3: Tel1 2013 04-04

Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04

Today’s schedule:

Thursday 2013-04-04

08:15-09:45 KTK215

Collaborative studying (PBL, step 7):

10:00-11:30 KTK215

Presenting the results of PBL

Instructions and evaluation criteria for the course environment

14:00-15:30KTK207

Optional ICT Workshop (with Jari Laru)

Page 4: Tel1 2013 04-04

Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04

PBL - Step 7

• Present your findings to the team• Discuss your findings and create a joint (20 min)

presentation about your answer to your learning goal/question

• Remember to include the sources of the information (references) somehow to your presentation

You have 90 minutes for this step

Page 5: Tel1 2013 04-04

Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04

PBL - Presenting the results

10:00 Factors of the environment that influence positively heterogenity?

10:20 How does blog support learning?

10:40 What are affordances of using VLE (Optima, Moodle, Wiki, BlackBoard…) from student and teacher perspective

11:00 Discovering the relations between different technological tools, their affordances and pedagogical purposes

Page 6: Tel1 2013 04-04

Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04

Constructing the course environment

– Every course design has some kind of ”home” environment. If you are not using any on-line learning environment, you should at least have one page (in wiki for example) where you give the basic information about the course structure and have links to all the necessary materials etc.

– The technical implementation is based on your scripts– The course structure, timing and all the learning spaces and

tools (physical or virtual) should be somehow visible. – Includes:

• Instructions and assignments• Pictures, other visual elements• Links or embeddings (existing materials)

– Remember to test all the links, check the spelling and revise the structural elements

DUE DATE: 14th of April

Send the link to your environment

to Venla and/or Jari

Page 7: Tel1 2013 04-04

Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04

The assessment criteria for the course platform and

implementation (1)5 • The course is constructed to be logical and clear.

• The learning outcomes of the course are explicit from the student’s point of view.

• The timetable, instructions and other materials are complete and follow the socio-technical design and pedagogical model.

• The implementation follows the pedagogical and technical scripts.

• The course is functional in terms of technology, content and pedagogy.

• The technical implementation (socio-technical design) is creative and innovative

4 • The course is constructed to be logical and clear. • The learning outcomes of the course are explicit.• The timetable, instructions and materials are based on

the chosen pedagogical model and socio-technical design.

• The implementation is based on the pedagogical and technical scripts.

• The course is functional in terms of technology, content and pedagogy.

Page 8: Tel1 2013 04-04

Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04

The assessment criteria for the course platform and

implementation (2)3 • The course is constructed to be mainly logical and clear.

• The learning outcomes of the course are explicit.• The timetable, instructions and materials are based on

the chosen pedagogical model and are mostly complete.

• The implementation is mainly based on the pedagogical and technical scripts.

• The course is mainly functional in terms of technology, content and pedagogy.

2 • The structure of the course is partly messy and unclear. • The learning outcomes of the course are not explicit.• The timetable, instructions and materials are not clearly

based on the pedagogical description and socio-technical design.

• The implementation is mostly not based on the pedagogical and technical scripts.

• There are some shortcomings in the technical or pedagogical functionalities.

Page 9: Tel1 2013 04-04

Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04

1 • The course implementation is ill structured and unclear. • The learning outcomes of the course are not explicit. • The timetable and other materials can be found in the

platform, but they are not based on the pedagogical description and socio-technical design.

• The whole implementation does not follow the pedagogical or technical scripts.

• There are critical shortcomings in the socio-technical and/or pedagogical functionalities.

0 • The implementation of the course is unfinished. The course platform is unclear and missing most of the necessary content and structure.

The team grade (0-5) is the (rounded) average of:• pedagogical script (graded 0-5)• technological script and course environment (graded 0-5)

The assessment criteria for the course platform and

implementation (3)

Page 10: Tel1 2013 04-04

Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04

Last meeting on April 18th:

PRESENTING THE COURSES THAT YOU HAVE DESIGNED

20 min / team(prepare a presentation as a team

with your own style)

DISCUSSION ABOUT YOUR DESIGN PROCESS AND EVALUATING YOUR COLLABORATION

(fill in the individual assessment forms before the meeting)