View
259
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04
TEL12013-04-04
Constructing the learning
environment for your TEL course
Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04
2013-01-31Thursday08:15-14:00KTK205 + KTK112
2013-02-14Thursday08:15-14:00KTK303 + KTK140
2013-02-28Thursday08:15-11:30KTK303 + KTK140
2013-03-01Friday08:15-15:45KTK215
2013-03-14Thursday08:15-14:00KTK112
2013-03-15Friday08:15-15:45KTK303
2013-04-04Thursday08:15-11:30KTK215
2013-04-18Thursday08:15-11:30HU108
Course info, lectures and collaborative studying
Lectures and collaborative studying
Lectures and collaborative studying
Problem-Based Learning (PBL)
Lectures and collaborative studying
Problem-Based Learning (PBL)
Lectures and collaborative studying
Collaborative studying and ending the course
GATHERING IDEAS
PEDAGOGICAL SCRIPTING
TECHNOLOGICAL SCRIPTING
CONSTRUCTING THE COURSE ENVIRONMENT
OUTCOME:A TEL
COURSE DESIGNED BY
YOU
Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04
Today’s schedule:
Thursday 2013-04-04
08:15-09:45 KTK215
Collaborative studying (PBL, step 7):
10:00-11:30 KTK215
Presenting the results of PBL
Instructions and evaluation criteria for the course environment
14:00-15:30KTK207
Optional ICT Workshop (with Jari Laru)
Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04
PBL - Step 7
• Present your findings to the team• Discuss your findings and create a joint (20 min)
presentation about your answer to your learning goal/question
• Remember to include the sources of the information (references) somehow to your presentation
You have 90 minutes for this step
Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04
PBL - Presenting the results
10:00 Factors of the environment that influence positively heterogenity?
10:20 How does blog support learning?
10:40 What are affordances of using VLE (Optima, Moodle, Wiki, BlackBoard…) from student and teacher perspective
11:00 Discovering the relations between different technological tools, their affordances and pedagogical purposes
Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04
Constructing the course environment
– Every course design has some kind of ”home” environment. If you are not using any on-line learning environment, you should at least have one page (in wiki for example) where you give the basic information about the course structure and have links to all the necessary materials etc.
– The technical implementation is based on your scripts– The course structure, timing and all the learning spaces and
tools (physical or virtual) should be somehow visible. – Includes:
• Instructions and assignments• Pictures, other visual elements• Links or embeddings (existing materials)
– Remember to test all the links, check the spelling and revise the structural elements
DUE DATE: 14th of April
Send the link to your environment
to Venla and/or Jari
Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04
The assessment criteria for the course platform and
implementation (1)5 • The course is constructed to be logical and clear.
• The learning outcomes of the course are explicit from the student’s point of view.
• The timetable, instructions and other materials are complete and follow the socio-technical design and pedagogical model.
• The implementation follows the pedagogical and technical scripts.
• The course is functional in terms of technology, content and pedagogy.
• The technical implementation (socio-technical design) is creative and innovative
4 • The course is constructed to be logical and clear. • The learning outcomes of the course are explicit.• The timetable, instructions and materials are based on
the chosen pedagogical model and socio-technical design.
• The implementation is based on the pedagogical and technical scripts.
• The course is functional in terms of technology, content and pedagogy.
Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04
The assessment criteria for the course platform and
implementation (2)3 • The course is constructed to be mainly logical and clear.
• The learning outcomes of the course are explicit.• The timetable, instructions and materials are based on
the chosen pedagogical model and are mostly complete.
• The implementation is mainly based on the pedagogical and technical scripts.
• The course is mainly functional in terms of technology, content and pedagogy.
2 • The structure of the course is partly messy and unclear. • The learning outcomes of the course are not explicit.• The timetable, instructions and materials are not clearly
based on the pedagogical description and socio-technical design.
• The implementation is mostly not based on the pedagogical and technical scripts.
• There are some shortcomings in the technical or pedagogical functionalities.
Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04
1 • The course implementation is ill structured and unclear. • The learning outcomes of the course are not explicit. • The timetable and other materials can be found in the
platform, but they are not based on the pedagogical description and socio-technical design.
• The whole implementation does not follow the pedagogical or technical scripts.
• There are critical shortcomings in the socio-technical and/or pedagogical functionalities.
0 • The implementation of the course is unfinished. The course platform is unclear and missing most of the necessary content and structure.
The team grade (0-5) is the (rounded) average of:• pedagogical script (graded 0-5)• technological script and course environment (graded 0-5)
The assessment criteria for the course platform and
implementation (3)
Venla VuorjokiLET – Learning and Educational Technology Research UnitUniversity of Oulu2013-04-04
Last meeting on April 18th:
PRESENTING THE COURSES THAT YOU HAVE DESIGNED
20 min / team(prepare a presentation as a team
with your own style)
DISCUSSION ABOUT YOUR DESIGN PROCESS AND EVALUATING YOUR COLLABORATION
(fill in the individual assessment forms before the meeting)