Upload
candace-harrington
View
214
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Teacher UnionsPros vs. Cons
ADMS 624Dr. BrandonSpring 2015
Charlotte Foster & Kierstyn Johnson
History of Teacher Unions
● 1857● 1897● 1902● 1906● 1920-1940● 1950’s● 1990-2000’s
Teacher Unions are a Necessity!● Popiel (2013) explored teacher union members’ beliefs
about the teacher union and their reasons for being active or inactive in the union.
● West & Mykerez examined the impact of collective bargaining on multiple dimensions (2011).
● According to the AFT, sixty-eight percent of union workers have guaranteed pensions; versus 14 percent of non-union one and 97% have jobs with health insurance (2014).
● The collective bargaining process offers teachers a voice on issues that matter most to them such as class sizes, hours and evaluations, during contract negotiations with their district” (West & Elton, 2011, p. 102).
Teacher unions with and without collective bargaining power
With:
contract negotiationscampaign moneyvoting power
Without:
campaign moneyvoting power
Do unionized states perform better in core subject tests?
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/01/08/quality-counts-sources-and-notes.html
Costs of unionized states- lower performing students perform lower- highest performing students do not perform
as high- higher teacher salaries result in less money
for other educational resources- administrators have less power to make
changes in school
Just for Fun!
Discussion Points
1) After listening to the presentation, do you believe in collective bargaining for teachers? Why? Why not?
2) How will teacher unions impact educational reform in the next ten years?
3) What’s more important:a. Average students performing higher?b. Lower level students performing higher? Higher level students performing
higher?
4) In which type of state would you feel most comfortable sending your child to school? In which type of state would you feel most comfortable working? 4
References
American Federation of Teachers. PreK-12 Public Education. (2014). Retrieved from
http://www.aft.org/education.
Chaison, G. N. (2002). Unions and legitimacy. Ithaca ; London: Ithaca ; London : ILR Press.
Coulson, A.J. (2010). The effects of teachers unions on education. Cato Journal, 30 (1), 155-169.
Eberts, R. (2007). Teacher unions and student performance: help or hindrance? The Future of Children. 17
(1), 175 – 200.
Education Week. (2015). (Map illustration of state education report cards January 2, 2015). Quality
Counts 2015: State Report
Cards Map. Retrieved from ->http://www.edweek.org/ew/qc/2015/2015-state-report-cards-map.html
Popiel, K. (2013). Teacher union legitimacy: Shifting the moral center for member engagement. Journal of
Educational Change, 14(4), 465-500.
Strunk, K., & Grissom, J. (2010). Do strong unions shape district policies? Collective bargaining, teacher
contract restrictiveness, and the political power of teachers’ unions. Educational Evaluation and
Policy Analysis. 32 (3), 389 – 406.
Talk Points Memo. (2011). (Map illustration of states with collective bargaining February 18, 2011). Look
at the Map. Retrieved from http://talkingpoints.
West, K. L., & Mykerezi, E. (2011). Teachers’ unions and compensation: The impact of collective bargaining
on salary schedules and performance pay schemes. Economics of Education Review, 30(1), 99-108.