Upload
georgia-granger
View
216
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Targeted research on the global N cycle: towards an International Nitrogen Management System (INMS)
Clare HowardCentre for Ecology & Hydrology, Edinburgh
GPNM Steering Committee Meeting9 Dec 2014, Washington DC
OverviewWhat is INMS and why is there the need for
such a project?The global policy perspective – how and
where to tackle the issues?How does INMS fit into all this and how is
the project structured?Where are we now and the existing landscape
The big ideaJoined up management of the nitrogen cycle
would strengthen the common cause of international waters & other global challenges
What would a global science policy support process for nitrogen look like?
What are the issues to connect?What are the main, research, demonstration
and communication challenges?
Nitrogen oxides(NOx)
Nitrous Oxide(N2O)
Ammonia(NH3)
Leached Nitrate (NO3
-)
Further emissionof NOx & N2O
carrying on the cascade
Natural ecosystems
Ammonium nitrate in rain (NH4NO3)
Nitrate in streams,groundwater &
coastal seas
High temperaturecombustion& industry
Nr
Livestock farmingfor food
Nr in manure
Eventual denitrification
to N2
Simplified view of the Nitrogen Cascade
Unintended N flows
N form in the cascade
Terrestrial Eutrophication
Freshwater Eutrophication
Greenhouse gas balance
Particulate Matter
Tropospheric ozone formation
Stratospheric ozone loss
Soil acidification
Urban air quality
Marine Eutrophication
Environmental concern from Nr
Fertilizermanufacture
Crops for food &animal feed
Crop biological nitrogen fixation
Intended N flow
Five key threats
The WAGES of too much nitrogen
Water qualityAir qualityGreenhouse balanceEcosystems Soil quality
European Nitrogen Assessment, 2011 & Our Nutrient World, 2013
Past change – future risksGlobal fertilizer use
Sutton and Bleeker Nature 2013based on FAO projections (Alexandratos & Bruinsma, 2012)
UnintendedN fixation incombustion
NOx capture& reuse
NUE combustion 5
Humans
Nr input by combustion
Energy Consumption & Transport
Choices
4 8
Full Chain NUEN,PNutrientResource
N&P Fertilizer
& Biological NitrogenFixation
Manure & sewage
fertilizer products
NUE sewage NUE manures
3
7
Feedsharvest
Livestockproduction
Foodharvest
NUEfeedcrop
NUE food crop
NUE animal
Food Consumption& Diet Choices
NUE food supply
Humans
1
2
1
69
Humans
Crop NUEN,P
10
Spatial optimization & integration
Nitrogenfor environment, food & energy security
• There is no global treaty that links the many benefits and threats of the altered N cycle.
• How can the different frameworks work together?
Key MEAs• UN Framework Convention on Climate Change• UN Convention on Biological Diversity• Montreal Protocol on stratospheric ozone• LRTAP convention and other regional agreements• Global Programme of Action for Protection of the Marine
Environment from Land-based Activities (GPA) and regional agreements
Parallel TracksTrack 1: International governance involving
countries and linking nitrogen challenges of too much and too little.
Track 2: A better coordinated science-policy support process – gathering evidence to support decision makers (INMS)
Track 3: Basic and applied field researchTrack 4: Extension, training, action etc.
UNEP – GEF INMS-targeted research
Outline proposal ($6M + $40M partner contributions)
Targeted Research on Global nitrogen cycle, toward the International Nitrogen Management System (INMS)
Opportunities- Indicator refinement, moving to operational delivery to
support countries, inc benchmarking- Sharing and development of mitigation and
management practices – understanding barriers- Regional demonstration on contrasting challenges, e.g.
Lake Victoria basin, East Asia, South Asia, East Europe
C1: Tools and
methods for understanding
the N cycle
C3: Regional
demonstration & verification
C4: Awareness raising &
knowledge sharing
C2:Global & regional quantification of N
use, flows, impacts & benefits of improved
practices
Components Diagram for INMS
Informing
modelling
requirements
Data need
& concepts
Opportunities,Local/region priorities,
Policy context, Local data,
Barriers-to-change
Improved management practices, Mitigation, Adaptation
Options & Scenarios, including
Cost-Benefit-Analysis
Improved basis for transformational actions
on N management
Development of policy homes,
Public awareness,Consensus building,
Regional DemonstrationsGaining an understanding of the nitrogen
issues specific to a regionImplementing management plans (during
project lifetime) to address the problemsCharting progress madeSharing best practice and knowledge
gained, across the projectWill also connect with regional modelling
activities
Regional DemonstrationsShould cover the four ‘cases’ outlined in the
PIFExisting activities
maximise achievement develop sustainability
3 or more countries - knowledge exchangeNetwork - scientific through to extension
organisationsCore team of director and 1-2 post-doctoral
personnelReasonable budget for travel for the network
Developing countries:
Excess nitrogen
East Asia(western Pacific seaboard)
China, Japan, S. Korea, Philippines
Network: INI East Asia, GPNM, OECD
Policy: PEMSEA, GPA
South AsiaIndia, Nepal, Sri
Lanka, BangladeshLead: INI South
AsiaPolicy: SACEP
South AmericaBrazil, tbc
Implementation: INI South America
Policy: Links to GPA
Economies in transition
Dniester. Dnieper, (part of) DanubeUkraine, Moldova, Romania, BelarusImplementation: EPN-EECCA, TFRN
Policy: UNECE -CLRTAP & Transboundary Waters, Black Sea Commission, Danube River
Basin Commission
Dniepr
Dniestr
Danube
Black Sea
Dniestr Dniepr Danubebasin area km² 71 442 503 988 785 306 runoff mm/yr 107 119 259 pop density inhab/km² 102 61 102 %agricultural area % 75 63 58 Net Inputs to wtshd kgN/km²/yr 2 264 2 660 3 605 N delivery at outlet kgN/km²/yr 132 99 468
Lake VictoriaKenya, Tanzania, Rwanda, BurundiLead: INI Africa
Policy: Lake Victoria
Commission
Developing countries:
Insufficient nitrogen
Developed countries:
Excess nitrogen
Western Europe, Atlantic Seaboard
France, Spain, PortugalUnfunded – supported
through existing projects, adding value to the global network.
Regional DemonstrationsDevelopment meetings
Japan, February 2015Ukraine, Spring 2015
BASF Fireside MeetingRegional case studiesScientists, policymakers, farmersSynergies with INMS
Toward anInternational
NitrogenManagement
System (INMS)
FLAG STAG
PANS
Identified N Risks
- Too much- Too littleN Fluxes, Levels
& DistributionExtent of
threats
Development of
Indicators
Options for Action
Measurements, data & statistics
Measurements, data & statistics
Hydrological,meteorological & bio-geochemical models
Biological & biogeochemical
models
System & Integrated Assessment Models
Data on Cost & Benefits
Valuation of benefits & threats
Programs & Policy Options
Technical support to GPA Information exchange
Monitor Progress
Evaluation of barriers to change
Technical, financial & socio-political data
BID
CBAG
STOAG
Scenarios& Goals
New technologies & other options;
Pilot Demonstration
Potential Working Group
Key Task
Measurement & data needs
Models needed
Policy Frameworks & key stakeholder
processes
WP1: Review existing N
biogeochemical, impact & integrated assessment
models
WP2: Develop global framework of the priority N-related issues to
be linked
WP3: Assess extent to which current models
deliver aspects of the global N framework
WP4: Evaluate options for linking component models
and datasets toward global &
regional N integrated assessment
WP5: Foster collaboration between key
modelling partners, considering short-
and long-term solutions
WP7: Develop recommendations for future global
& regional N modelling
WP8: Develop options for long-
term INMS durability and international authorization
WP6: Identify and pilot priority linkages between
key models
INMS-pp Integrated Assessment modelling for nitrogen
INMS – building up to PPG•PIF Development Phase
• Distribution and collation of pro-formas to express interest - co-financing
• Final submission in 2013• PIF agreed this year• Ongoing discussions with potential
demonstration areas – India, Eastern Europe
•Post PIF development• Request for updated pro-formas July 2014• Further development of demonstration
activities
Project Preparation Grant PhaseMilestones & events (now until July 2015)
Addressing GEF and STAP comments (at PIF approval)
• Avoiding overlap with GNF (Annex to FSP)
• Details on Policy Options for track 1 (FSP)
• Strengthen stakeholder participation/communication processes (C4)
• Better explain the global trade of N based products
• INMS sustainability plan (as part of review of ‘homes for nitrogen’/FSP formulation)
INMS –PPG TimescaleCo-financing commitment written confirmation
By June 2015
CEO endorsement documentation validation meeting or thru circulation
June 2015
STAP Review of CEO endorsement package July 2015UNEP’s review by the UNEP Project Review Committee
July 2015
Submission to GEF Sec for CEO endorsement
August 2015
Launching of the FSP at IWC8 October 2015
INMS EngagementFull Partner meeting
13th & 14th April, Lisbon, Portugal (tbc)Further discussion on commitment of co-financing,
refining demonstration activities, developing project components
Followed by a meeting of the UNECE Task Force on Reactive Nitrogen
INMS and Integrated Assessment ModellingINMSpp Meeting, 5th& 6th May, EdinburghFollowed by a meeting of the UNECE Task Force on
Integrated Assessment ModellingOpen meetings
INMS EngagementWebsite
Core place for information exchangeDocuments and discussionSection on demonstration areas – to refine the
approach – open for comments by the communityList of partners to the project and other groups
NewsletterMonthly e-mailed newsletter, starting this month,
updates to partners and all other interested parties
Pro-formaSubmit if not done so to establish an interest
International Nitrogen Initiative
INIUNECE
Task Force on Reactive Nitrogen
TFRN
GPNMUNEP/GPA
Global Partnership on Nutrient Management
OECDWorking Party on Nitrogen Indicators
INMSGEF/UNEP/INI
Targeted Research toward International Nitrogen Management System
Views on
NUENitrogen Use
Efficiency
EUNitrogen
Expert Panel
EU-NEP
IRPAN...CBD N indicator...
Nitrogen: the existing landscape
INI & Nitrogen AssessmentsIGBP-SCOPE-Future Earth: science communityRegional Centres
European Nitrogen Assessment (2011)US Nitrogen Assessment (2012)Africa, South Asia, Latin America, East
Asia (work in progress)
What about global assessment?
UNEP: Global Partnership on Nutrient Management (GPNM)Focus on agriculture, linking N P
and other nutrientsEmphasis on practice improvement,
and sharing between stakeholders globally (industry, science, UN).
Now has a Task Group on NUE (focused on field scale)
UNECE Task Force on Reactive Nitrogen (TFRN)
UNECE CLRTAP: Convention on Long range Transboundary Air Pollution
N and air pollution – but toward integrated approachGothenburg Protocol, Annex IX, Ammonia Guidance Doc,
Ammonia Framework Code – adopted yesterday in Geneva, Guidance Doc N budgets
Framework Code adopted (yesterday)WGSR Dec 2015 – full day with all countries in UNECE
on Agricultural Air PollutionENA reporting, with input NEU, NinE and COSTNitrogen and Food, scenariosNitrogen and EECCA countries a key priorityNECD National Emission Ceilings Directive–
Framework Code revision and Annex III.
OECD – regional N indicatorsAgricultural N balances over territoriesMove towards regional indicators: economy
wide N indicatorNitrogen to complement carbon indicator set
Others...IRPAN: International Research Programme
on Agricultural nitrogen – under development; strong biotech focus e.g. a world without fertilizers....?
UN-CBD: Convention on Biological Diversity: nitrogen indicator
There are definitely more...
Multiple relevance of the nitrogen challenge
Biodiversity:
CBD
Marine:GPA
+ regional
Stratosphere:
Montreal
Protocol
Air Quality: LRTAP + regional
INMSInternational
Nitrogen Management
System(Science Support Process linking
threats & benefits)
UNEP &
UNEA
Overarching Goals includingEconomy Wide Nitrogen Use Efficiency
More food and energy with less pollution
Climate:UNFCC
C
SDGs
FAO WMOWHO
INI
Major Groups
National Champion
s
GPNM
Thankyou – and questions!