Upload
calota-constantin
View
270
Download
27
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Sandstone acidizing technique
Citation preview
1
Sandstone AcidizingSandstone AcidizingSandstone AcidizingSandstone Acidizing
2
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Outline
• Sandstone vs. Carbonate• Sandstone composition• Mineral surface area• Reaction of HF with silicates• Design methodology
• Fluid selection
• Mud Acid, Clay Acid and Organic Clay Acid.
• Avoid problems
2
3
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Objectives• Describe the sandstone acidizing process.• List the key components in sandstones.• State the importance of mineral surface area. • Describe the primary, 2nd and tertiary reactions of mud acid
with clay.• State the major components of spent mud acid. • List the incompatible ions with spent mud acid and state why
they are incompatible.• State the problems associated with illite and chlorite.• State the purpose of the each sandstone treatment stage.• Describe the fluid selection process.• Describe when/why Mud Acid, Clay Acid and OCA are used.• Describe Mud Acid, Clay Acid and OCA treatment designs and
how they are different.• State how to avoid potential problems during a treatment.
4
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Carbonate vs. Sandstone
CARBONATE
• A large fraction of the matrix is soluble (>50%)
• Dissolution of rock (wormholes)– damage bypass
• Diversion
SANDSTONE
• Dissolution of the damaging mineral
• A small fraction of the matrix is dissolved
• Potential precipitation
•Treatment of sandstone with high calcite content (>20%):
– Use carbonate design methodology
– Use sandstone diversion techniques
– Iron control may be a problem
3
5
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Sandstone Constituents
QuartzQuartzQuartzQuartz
*Feldspars*Feldspars*Feldspars*Feldspars
*Chert*Chert*Chert*Chert
*Mica*Mica*Mica*Mica
SecondarySecondarySecondarySecondary
CementCementCementCement
(Carbonate Quartz)(Carbonate Quartz)(Carbonate Quartz)(Carbonate Quartz)
ClaysClaysClaysClays
(Pore lining(Pore lining(Pore lining(Pore lining
i.e., illite)i.e., illite)i.e., illite)i.e., illite)
ClaysClaysClaysClays
(Pore filling(Pore filling(Pore filling(Pore filling
i.e., Kaolinite)i.e., Kaolinite)i.e., Kaolinite)i.e., Kaolinite)
RemainingRemainingRemainingRemaining
Pore SpacePore SpacePore SpacePore Space
6
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Minerals Minerals Minerals Minerals Chemical CompositionChemical CompositionChemical CompositionChemical Composition
QuartzQuartzQuartzQuartz QuartzQuartzQuartzQuartz Si0Si0Si0Si02222
Feldspars Feldspars Feldspars Feldspars OrthoclaseOrthoclaseOrthoclaseOrthoclase KAlSiKAlSiKAlSiKAlSi3333OOOO8888
MicroclineMicroclineMicroclineMicrocline KAlSiKAlSiKAlSiKAlSi3333OOOO8888
AlbiteAlbiteAlbiteAlbite NaSiNaSiNaSiNaSi3333AlOAlOAlOAlO8888
PlagioclasePlagioclasePlagioclasePlagioclase SiSiSiSi2222----3333AlAlAlAl1111----2222OOOO8888(Na,Ca)(Na,Ca)(Na,Ca)(Na,Ca)
MicasMicasMicasMicas BiotiteBiotiteBiotiteBiotite (AlSi(AlSi(AlSi(AlSi3333OOOO10101010) K(Mg, Fe)) K(Mg, Fe)) K(Mg, Fe)) K(Mg, Fe)3333(OH)(OH)(OH)(OH)2222
MuscoviteMuscoviteMuscoviteMuscovite (AlSi(AlSi(AlSi(AlSi3333OOOO10101010) K(Al)) K(Al)) K(Al)) K(Al)2222OH) OH) OH) OH) 2222
Clays Clays Clays Clays ChloriteChloriteChloriteChlorite (Mg, Fe(Mg, Fe(Mg, Fe(Mg, Fe+2+2+2+2, Fe, Fe, Fe, Fe+3+3+3+3))))6666SiSiSiSi3333AlOAlOAlOAlO10 10 10 10 (OH)(OH)(OH)(OH)8888
KaoliniteKaoliniteKaoliniteKaolinite AlAlAlAl4444(Si(Si(Si(Si4444OOOO10101010)(OH))(OH))(OH))(OH)8888
IlliteIlliteIlliteIllite SiSiSiSi3333AlOAlOAlOAlO10101010(OH)(OH)(OH)(OH)2222KAlKAlKAlKAl2222
SmectiteSmectiteSmectiteSmectite (AlSi(AlSi(AlSi(AlSi3333OOOO10101010)Mg)Mg)Mg)Mg5555(Al,Fe)(OH)(Al,Fe)(OH)(Al,Fe)(OH)(Al,Fe)(OH)8888
MixedMixedMixedMixed----LayerLayerLayerLayer Kaolinite, Illite or Chlorite with SmectiteKaolinite, Illite or Chlorite with SmectiteKaolinite, Illite or Chlorite with SmectiteKaolinite, Illite or Chlorite with Smectite
QuartzQuartzQuartzQuartz QuartzQuartzQuartzQuartz Si0Si0Si0Si02222
Feldspars Feldspars Feldspars Feldspars OrthoclaseOrthoclaseOrthoclaseOrthoclase KAlSiKAlSiKAlSiKAlSi3333OOOO8888
MicroclineMicroclineMicroclineMicrocline KAlSiKAlSiKAlSiKAlSi3333OOOO8888
AlbiteAlbiteAlbiteAlbite NaSiNaSiNaSiNaSi3333AlOAlOAlOAlO8888
PlagioclasePlagioclasePlagioclasePlagioclase SiSiSiSi2222----3333AlAlAlAl1111----2222OOOO8888(Na,Ca)(Na,Ca)(Na,Ca)(Na,Ca)
MicasMicasMicasMicas BiotiteBiotiteBiotiteBiotite (AlSi(AlSi(AlSi(AlSi3333OOOO10101010) K(Mg, Fe)) K(Mg, Fe)) K(Mg, Fe)) K(Mg, Fe)3333(OH)(OH)(OH)(OH)2222
MuscoviteMuscoviteMuscoviteMuscovite (AlSi(AlSi(AlSi(AlSi3333OOOO10101010) K(Al)) K(Al)) K(Al)) K(Al)2222OH) OH) OH) OH) 2222
Clays Clays Clays Clays ChloriteChloriteChloriteChlorite (Mg, Fe(Mg, Fe(Mg, Fe(Mg, Fe+2+2+2+2, Fe, Fe, Fe, Fe+3+3+3+3))))6666SiSiSiSi3333AlOAlOAlOAlO10 10 10 10 (OH)(OH)(OH)(OH)8888
KaoliniteKaoliniteKaoliniteKaolinite AlAlAlAl4444(Si(Si(Si(Si4444OOOO10101010)(OH))(OH))(OH))(OH)8888
IlliteIlliteIlliteIllite SiSiSiSi3333AlOAlOAlOAlO10101010(OH)(OH)(OH)(OH)2222KAlKAlKAlKAl2222
SmectiteSmectiteSmectiteSmectite (AlSi(AlSi(AlSi(AlSi3333OOOO10101010)Mg)Mg)Mg)Mg5555(Al,Fe)(OH)(Al,Fe)(OH)(Al,Fe)(OH)(Al,Fe)(OH)8888
MixedMixedMixedMixed----LayerLayerLayerLayer Kaolinite, Illite or Chlorite with SmectiteKaolinite, Illite or Chlorite with SmectiteKaolinite, Illite or Chlorite with SmectiteKaolinite, Illite or Chlorite with Smectite
Formation Minerals - Silicates
4
7
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Chemical Chemical Chemical Chemical
MineralsMineralsMineralsMinerals CompositionCompositionCompositionComposition
Formation Minerals
CarbonatesCarbonatesCarbonatesCarbonates CalciteCalciteCalciteCalcite CaCOCaCOCaCOCaCO3333
DolomiteDolomiteDolomiteDolomite Ca, Mg(COCa, Mg(COCa, Mg(COCa, Mg(CO3333))))2222
AnkeriteAnkeriteAnkeriteAnkerite Ca,(Mg,Fe)(COCa,(Mg,Fe)(COCa,(Mg,Fe)(COCa,(Mg,Fe)(CO3333) ) ) ) 2222
SideriteSideriteSideriteSiderite FeCOFeCOFeCOFeCO3333
Sulfates Sulfates Sulfates Sulfates GypsumGypsumGypsumGypsum CaSOCaSOCaSOCaSO4444·2H·2H·2H·2H2222OOOO
AnhydriteAnhydriteAnhydriteAnhydrite CaSOCaSOCaSOCaSO4444
OthersOthersOthersOthers HaliteHaliteHaliteHalite NaClNaClNaClNaCl
Iron OxidesIron OxidesIron OxidesIron Oxides
8
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
• Mineral Composition & Surface Area
• Dominant Factor « Surface Area
• Reaction Rate: Clays > Feldspars > Quartz
Mineral Specific Area
Quartz Few cm2/g
Feldspar Few cm2/g
Clays: Kaolinite 22 m2/g
Illite 113 m2/g
Smectite 82 m2/g
Reaction Rate - Factors
5
9
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Mud Acids: HCl – HF • Hydrochloric wt% + Hydrofluoric wt%
� 12 – 3, 12 – 2
� 13.5 – 1.5
� 9 –1.5, 9 – 1
� 6 –1.5, 6 - 1
� 4.5 – 0.5
• Siliceous minerals
10
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Reaction of Mud Acid (HCl – HF) with Clay
PrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimary
(5+x) (5+x) (5+x) (5+x) HF HF HF HF + M+ M+ M+ M----AlAlAlAl----Si + (3Si + (3Si + (3Si + (3----x+1) Hx+1) Hx+1) Hx+1) H+ + + + ====
HSiFHSiFHSiFHSiF5 5 5 5 + + + + AlFAlFAlFAlFxxxx(3(3(3(3----x)+x)+x)+x)+ + M+ M+ M+ M++++ + 2H+ 2H+ 2H+ 2H2222OOOO
Spent HF
Si(OH)4
AlF2+
Si(OH)
Si(OH)Si(OH)
HF
Clay
Tertiary
AlF2+ + M-Al-Si + (3-x+1) H+ + H2O =
2AlF2+ + M+ + Si(OH)4
Secondary
X/5 HSiF5 + M-Al-Si + (3-x+1) H+ + H2O =
AlFx(3-x)+ + M+ + Si(OH)4
NaNaNaNa++++ or Kor Kor Kor K++++
6
11
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Precautions to Avoid Precipitates
• Potassium fluosilicates
K2SiF6
AVOID CONTACT WITH K, Na, Ca
•Calcium fluoride
CaF2
•REMOVE CALCITE
•Aluminum fluoride
AlF3
MAINTAIN A LOW pH
12
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Hydrated/Amorphous Silica: Cannot Avoid
Si(OH)4
Al
7
13
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Former Site of Kaolinite Following Mud Acid Treatment
14
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Design Methodology to Maximize Stimulation
8
15
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Sandstone Acidizing Fluid Stages
Pre-acid Preflush:NH4Cl brine or toluene/xylene displaces water containing incompatible cations (Na+, K+, Ca++) away from the wellbore.
Preflush:HCl (or organic acid) removes CaCO3 from matrix to prevent the precipitation of CaF2.
Main Fluid:Mud acid removes silt and clay (alumino-silicate) formation damageOverflush: Displaces spent acid away from the critical matrix.Diverter:Decreases fluid flow into the thief zone/s and increases flow into other non-treated zones.
16
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Sandstone Acidizing Fluid Stages
1. Pre-acid Preflush: NH4Cl brine or toluene/xylene displaces water containing incompatible cations (Na+, K+, Ca++) away from the wellbore.
2. Preflush: HCl (or organic acid) removes CaCO3 from matrix to prevent the precipitation of CaF2.
3. Main Fluid: Mud acid (HCl – HF) removes silt and clay (alumino-silicate) formation damage
4. Overflush: Displaces spent acid away from the critical matrix. 5. Diverter: Decreases fluid flow into the thief zone/s and increases
flow into other non-treated zones.
9
Sandstone Acidizing Fluid Selection Sandstone Acidizing Fluid Selection Sandstone Acidizing Fluid Selection Sandstone Acidizing Fluid Selection
18
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Matrix Treatment Design Methodology
• Candidate Selection
• Establish Nature and Location of Damage
• Treating Fluid/Additive SelectionTreating Fluid/Additive SelectionTreating Fluid/Additive SelectionTreating Fluid/Additive Selection
• Determine Pressure/Injection Rate
• Establish Fluid Volumes
• Develop Pumping Schedule and Placement Strategy
• Define Shut-in/Cleanup Stages
• Economics Assess Productivity and Profitability
10
19
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Fluids Available
• Hydrochloric acid
– Preflush
– Main acid component
– Overflush
• Hydrofluoric acid systems
– Mud Acid
– Organic Mud Acid
– Fluoboric Acid (Clay Acid)
– Organic Fluoboric Acid (OCA)
• Organic Acids
– Formic
– Acetic
– Citric
20
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Selection Criteria
• Formation mineralogyFormation mineralogyFormation mineralogyFormation mineralogy
– Reactivity
• Chemical composition
• Surface area
– Rock Structure
• HCl solubility
• Clay distribution
– Sensitivity
• Deconsolidation
• Precipitation
• Fines release
• PermeabilityPermeabilityPermeabilityPermeability
– Type of damage
– Mobility of induced damage
• Produced FluidsProduced FluidsProduced FluidsProduced Fluids
– Oil wells: Sludge/Emulsions
– Gas wells: Water saturation
• TemperatureTemperatureTemperatureTemperature
– Corrosion
– Penetration
• Bottomhole pressureBottomhole pressureBottomhole pressureBottomhole pressure
11
21
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Pre-Acid Preflush
• Ammonium chloride (NH4Cl)
• Guideline– 3 wt% (<5% Clay)
– 4 wt% (5 -10%)
– 5 wt% (10 -15%)
– 6 wt% (>15%)
• Calculated Concentration = 3% + – (% Smectite + % Mixed Layer*0.5)*0.3) +
– (% Illite+ % Mixed Layer*0.5)*0.12) +
– % Kaolinite*0.08 +
– % Chlorite*0.12 +
– % Feldspar*0.05)
Formation Brine
HCl
22
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
HCl Preflush/Overflush
HCl Fluid Selection Guide for All Temperatures
>100 md 20-100 md <20 md
<10% silt and <10% clay 15X 10X 7.5X
All other combinations ofsilt and clay composition 10X 7.5X 5X
<4% chlorite/glauconite, use < 20md Guidelines for HCl.4-6% chlorite/glauconite, use <20md Guidelines for HCl with 5% Acetic Acid in PF/OF>6% chlorite/glauconite, use 10% Acetic Acid PF/OF to Organic Clay Acid HT<2% Zeolite, use 10% Acetic Acid in HCl PF/OF with 5% Acetic Acid in Mud Acid 2-5% Zeolite, use 10% Acetic Acid as PF/OF with Organic Clay Acid >5% Zeolite, use 10% Acetic Acid as PF/OF with Organic Clay Acid HT
12
23
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 10 20 30 40Weight % of HCl in Acid Formulation
Max
Wt
% o
f H
F in
Aci
d F
orm
ula
tio
n
Ideal CaseIdeal CaseIdeal CaseIdeal Case
0% Calcite0% Calcite0% Calcite0% Calcite
3% Calcite 3% Calcite 3% Calcite 3% Calcite
6% Calcite 6% Calcite 6% Calcite 6% Calcite
*Based on AlF*Based on AlF*Based on AlF*Based on AlF3333 & CaF& CaF& CaF& CaF2222 pptpptpptppt
Increasing wt.% of calcite Increasing wt.% of calcite Increasing wt.% of calcite Increasing wt.% of calcite
undissolved by HCl Preflushundissolved by HCl Preflushundissolved by HCl Preflushundissolved by HCl Preflush
HCl/HF Ratio to Avoid AlF3 & CaF2
with CaCO3 Remaining
24
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
HCl Preflush Volume to Dissolve all
Calcite 2 feet Radially
13
25
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Main Acid (HF) Volume
• Targeted reduction: 90% in damage skin.
• Minimum skin achievable: Total of pseudoskin
• StimCADESkiSkin
Volume
?
??
Mud Acid Systems Available
Mud Acid
Organic Mud Acid
Fluoboric Acid (Clay Acid)
Organic Clay Acid (OCA)
14
27
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Mud Acid
• Nine HCI-HF formulations
• Dissolves siliceous minerals (silt and clay)
• Schlumberger (Dowell) offered the first commercial Mud
Acid Service in 1940 in the (U.S. Gulf Coast).
+
HCl
HFor
Y1
Mud Acid
28
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
NHNHNHNH4444 HFHFHFHF2222 ((((Y1Y1Y1Y1) + X ) + X ) + X ) + X HCl HCl HCl HCl (X (X (X (X ---- 1) HCl + 2 HF + NH 1) HCl + 2 HF + NH 1) HCl + 2 HF + NH 1) HCl + 2 HF + NH 4444 CICICICI
Mud AcidMud AcidMud AcidMud Acid
((((25% HCl + 20% HF25% HCl + 20% HF25% HCl + 20% HF25% HCl + 20% HF) + HCl + H ) + HCl + H ) + HCl + H ) + HCl + H 22220 Dilute HCl / HF0 Dilute HCl / HF0 Dilute HCl / HF0 Dilute HCl / HF
Field Generation of Mud Acid (HCl/HF)
15
29
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
+ A high HCI solubility can be indicative of carbonate cementation in the absence of petrographical data++ No or limited HCI preflush preferred+++ Perform a Mud Acid treatment prior to pumping acid. Use guidelines for Small Fines Migration problem to select Mud Acid System
Silts and Clays
Native During Production (fines migration)
Carbonate Cemented Sandstones+Noncarbonate Cemented Sandstones
T> 300o FNARS201
T< 300o FReg. Clay Acid ++
Small Fines Migration ProblemSevere Fines Migration Problems
Use guidelines for damage induced by completion operations.
Options: in matrix, sandstones:Noncarbonate cemented Overflush with 5% HCI containingClay Control Agents L42, L53W or L55
T> 300o FNARS201
Reg. Clay Acid+++
Organic Clay Acid
130oF <T<300oFReg. Clay Acid+++
Organic Clay Acid
T> 130o FClay Acid LT+++
Organic Clay Acid
30
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Silts and Clays
Induced by Completion Operations
In Fissures, Gravel Packsor High-Permeability Matrix
In Matrix
Mud and Silt Remover Treatments+
Noncarbonate Cemented Sandstones
Mud Acid Treatments (MA)++++
Carbonate Cemented Sandstones++
Regular Clay Acid+++
+ The MSR formulation should be based on the HCI guidelines and Mud Acid guidelines. For carbonate cemented sandstones, Breakdown Acid or HCI-base MSR is recommended.
++ A high HCI solubility can be indicative of carbonate cementation in the absence of petrographical data.+++ limited HCI preflush is recommended in this case.++++ See Mud Acid Selection Guide for Native Damage
16
31
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Mud Acid Selection GuideMud Acid Selection GuideMud Acid Selection GuideMud Acid Selection Guide
HCl HCl HCl HCl ---- HFHFHFHF
> 100 md 20-100 md < 20 md
< 10% silt and < 10% clay 12 - 3 8 - 2 6 - 1.5
> 10% silt and > 10% clay 13.5 - 1.5 9 - 1 4.5 - .5
> 10% silt and < 10% clay 12 - 2 9 - 1.5 6 - 1
< 10% silt and > 10% clay 12 - 2 9 - 1.5 6 - 1
32
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Mud Acid Guidelines for Reservoirs with < 2% Zeolites* > 20 md < 20 md < 10% Silt and <10% Clay 8% HCl/2% HF with 5% Acetic 6% HCl/1.5% HF with 5% Acetic > 10% Silt and >10% Clay 9% HCl/1% HF with 5% Acetic 4.5% HCl/0.5% HF with 5% Acetic Other 9% HCl/1.5% HF with 5% Acetic 6% HCl/1.5% HF with 5% Acetic
Mud Acid Guidelines for Reservoirs with 2 -5% Zeolites* > 20 md < 20 md All Silt and Clay Ranges OCA OCA
Mud Acid Guidelines for Reservoirs with >5% Zeolites* > 20 md < 20 md All Silt and Clay Ranges OCA HT OCA HT *10% Acetic Acid PF/OF and use OCA when fines migration is a problem.
17
33
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Mud Acid Guidelines for Reservoirs with < 3 Chlorite/Glauconite > 20 md < 20 md
< 10% Silt and <10% Clay 6% HCl/1.5% HF 6% HCl/1.5% HF
> 10% Silt and >10% Clay 4.5% HCl/0.5% HF 4.5% HCl/0.5% HF
Other 6% HCl/1% HF 6% HCl/1% HF
Mud Acid Guidelines for Reservoirs with 4 - 6% Chlorite/Glauconite > 20 md < 20 md
< 10% Silt and <10% Clay 8% HCl/2% HF with 5% Acetic 6% HCl/1.5% HF with 5% Acetic
> 10% Silt and >10% Clay 9% HCl/1% HF with 5% Acetic 4.5% HCl/0.5% HF with 5% Acetic
Other 9% HCl/1.5% HF with 5% Acetic 6% HCl/1% HF with 5% Acetic
Mud Acid Guidelines for Reservoirs with >6% Chlorite/Glauconite* > 20 md < 20 md
All Silt and Clay Ranges OCA OCA
* 10% Acetic Acid PF/OF
34
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Clay Instability in HCl
MineralMineralMineralMineral
• Zeolites
• Chlorites
• Illite
• Mixed Layer
• Smectite
• Kaolinite
Max. T in HCl (deg F)Max. T in HCl (deg F)Max. T in HCl (deg F)Max. T in HCl (deg F)
75
150
190
200
200
250
Effluent From Core #640
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19Sample #
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n (
mg
/L)
15 wt% HCl 12 wt% HCl - 6 wt% NH4Cl 3 wt% HF
Fe
Al
K
Si
Mg
Short Berea Core #2: 12-3 Mud Acid
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19Sample Number
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n (
mg
/L) Al
SiCaFeKMg
10 wt% Acetic Acid + 6 wt% NH4Cl
12 wt% HCl - 3 wt% HF
6 wt% NH4Cl
All clays have a temperature at which they become unstable in HCl. Unstable clays decompose quickly, consume HCl and can migrate.
Jauf Core # 710 HCl and Mud Acid Sensitivity Test @ 300oF
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0.00 25.00 50.00 75.00
Cumulative Pore Volume
Del
ta P
ress
ure
(p
si)
12 wt% HCl -3 wt% HF Mud Acid
15 wt% HCl6 wt% Ammonium
Chloride
6 wt% Ammonium
Chloride
18
35
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Organic Mud Acid
• Formic acid (9% L036 replaces 12% HCl)
• Less corrosive than comparable Mud Acid formulations
• Reaction rate ~ 1/4 that of Mud Acid
• Reduces sludge tendency
+
L36
(Formic)
HFor
Y1
Mud Acid
36
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Retarded HF Systems• Problem
– Mud Acid (HCl-HF) spends very rapidly near the wellbore and is not effective in removing clays and other fines deep in the formation.
–Some wells show good stimulation initially, but experience a rapid production decline.
• Solution
–Retarded Mud Acid system for deep Hydrofluoric penetration.
–A system that stabilizes formation fines.
–Low HF concentrations
19
37
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Retarded HF formulation using
Fluoboric Acid (HBF4)
Clay Acid
• Ammonium bifluoride + boric acid + HCl
• HBF4
+ H20 HBF
3(OH) + HF
• HF reacts with silt and clay
• HBF4
continues to generate HF slowly
38
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
20
39
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Kaolinite Observed With SEM
40
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
21
41
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
800
600
400
200
0
0 10 20 30 40
Fluoboric/Clay Acid
12% HCl - 3%HF
1st 6 in.
Unconsolidation
1st 6 in.
Unconsolidation
Distance From Inlet (in.)Distance From Inlet (in.)Distance From Inlet (in.)Distance From Inlet (in.)
Pe
rme
ab
ilit
y, %
Ch
an
ge
Pe
rme
ab
ilit
y, %
Ch
an
ge
Pe
rme
ab
ilit
y, %
Ch
an
ge
Pe
rme
ab
ilit
y, %
Ch
an
ge
Improved Penetration with Fluoboric Acid
42
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
00 5 10 15 20 25 30
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
00 5 10 15 20 25 30
UntreatedUntreatedUntreatedUntreated TreatedTreatedTreatedTreated% of Original Permeability % of Original Permeability
Pore VolumesPore VolumesPore VolumesPore Volumes Pore VolumesPore VolumesPore VolumesPore VolumesDistilled Water
6% Sodium Chloride
Clay Acid
Water Sensitivity Test Frio Sand
22
43
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
*Clay Acid LT can be used to 130O F,
but is not recommended above 130O F.
BHST (BHST (BHST (BHST (°F) F) F) F) Clay Acid LTClay Acid LTClay Acid LTClay Acid LTRegular Clay AcidRegular Clay AcidRegular Clay AcidRegular Clay Acid
100 96 48110 76 38120 52 26
130 35 18140 24 *150 16 *
160 11 *170 8 *180 5 *
190 3 *225 2 *250 1 *300 0.5 *
Minimum ShutMinimum ShutMinimum ShutMinimum Shut----in Time (hrin Time (hrin Time (hrin Time (hr))))
Fluoboric Acid Shut-In Time
44
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
• Preflush to Mud Acid: Very acid sensitive formation
• Main Acid: Carbonate-cemented sandstones
• Overflush to Mud Acid: Enhanced fines control
• Shut-in and bring production back slowly
Clay Acid Applications
Clay Acid
100-125 gal/ft
NH4Cl w/ U66
30-60 gal/ft
Mud Acid
100-150 gal/ft
HCl or DAD
50-75 gal/ft
23
45
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Publications on Clay Acid
Mobil - SPE 8399
Arco - SPE 11722
Exxon - SPE 9387
Tenneco - SPE 14820
AGIP - SPE 20623
Statoil - SPE 24991
Statoil - SPE 31077
Ashland - IPA
46
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Evaluation of Fluoboric Acid Treatment in the Grand Isle
Offshore area using Multiple Flow Rate Test
• Seven case histories were presented
• A plot of (Pws2 - Pwf
2) / Qg vs. Qg (the turbulence plot) was used
as an evaluation tool.
REF: McBride, Rathbone, and Thomas, SPE 8399
∆( ) 'PQ
P PQ C D Q
g
ws wf
gL g
2 2 2
=−
= +
24
47
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
2
1
00 5 10 15
)/(/)( SCFDPSIQp 22∆
6 months after RMA6 months after RMA6 months after RMA6 months after RMA
After RMAAfter RMAAfter RMAAfter RMA
After Clay AcidAfter Clay AcidAfter Clay AcidAfter Clay Acid
3 years after Clay Acid3 years after Clay Acid3 years after Clay Acid3 years after Clay Acid
Q (MMCFD)Q (MMCFD)Q (MMCFD)Q (MMCFD)
48
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0
-6 0 10 20 30 40 50
After After After After
MudMudMudMud
Acid Acid Acid Acid
Trt.Trt.Trt.Trt.
After Fluoboric Acid TreatmentAfter Fluoboric Acid TreatmentAfter Fluoboric Acid TreatmentAfter Fluoboric Acid Treatment
Time (Months)
Q (
MM
scf/
D)
25
49
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Silicon to Aluminum ratios in HF and Fluoboric Acid effluents
Zone Sample HCL/HF Fluoboric
C(3.4) B 0.6 -C - 2.9C’ - 2.5
A(1.7) E 0.5 -F - 1.6F’ - 1.7
50
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
SPE 20623SPE 20623SPE 20623SPE 20623
ADVANCES IN MATRIX STIMULATION TECHNOLOGYADVANCES IN MATRIX STIMULATION TECHNOLOGYADVANCES IN MATRIX STIMULATION TECHNOLOGYADVANCES IN MATRIX STIMULATION TECHNOLOGY
G. Paccaloni and M. Tambini AGIP Spa
• Incorrect Stimulation Fluid
• Initial: 2200 BOPD 400 BOPD @ 6 months
• Reperforate: 2000 BOPD Same decline
• Mud Acid: 2000 BOPD Same decline
• Fluoboric Acid: 1900 BOPD @ 60 months
26
51
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Ashland Oil Well No. 3
Pro
duct
ion
(BL
PD
)
Time (Years)
Figure 8 - Production of Oil Well No. 3 showing decline after Mud Acid treatmentindicative of fines migration and sustained production after fluoboric acid treatment.
Decline after Mud Acid & Clay Control Treatment
After Fluoboric Acid Treatment
52
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
CONCLUSIONS• HBF4 generates HF at a slow rate thus providing deeper live-acid penetration
than is possible with ordinary HCl/HF acid.
• Treatment with HBF4 prevents silt and clay migration/swelling through fusion of platelets and reduction of CEC. This should prevent fines dispersion resulting from both ionic shock and mechanical dislodgment.
• HBF4 normally is used n combination with HCl/HF acid. The faster-reacting HCl/HF acid removes damage immediately around the wellbore, while the HBF4 penetrates deeper to remove formation damage and to stabilize clays and other fines.
• A shut-in period is required following injection of HBF4 to allow spending of the acid and stabilization of the clay.
• HBF4 is less damaging to formation integrity than HCl/HF acid.
• Fluoboric acid minimizes silica formation.
• Case history studies of the use of fluoboric acid in sandstone matrix acidizing indicate that the system is very effective in removing formation damage and stabilizing formation fines.
27
Organic Fluoboric Acid (OCA) for HCl Sensitive Sandstone Formations
54
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Applications
• HCl Sensitive Formations
–Unconsolidated sandstones
–Chlorite
–Zeolite
• High Silt/Clay Content
–> 30% Silt/Clay
• HT formations
–T > 300 F
28
55
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Fluid Selection Guidelines
OCA-HT OCA
Temp >300F yes
Temp < 300F yes
Zeolite <5% yes
Zeolite >5% any temp yes
Chlorite <5% yes
Chlorite >5% any temp yes
56
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Experimental Methods• Sequential Acid Spending
29
57
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Testing Results
• Sequential acid spending on 90% 100 mesh sand and 10% zeolite, 200oF
Sequential Reaction ----->0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
1 2 3 4
Si C
on
cen
trat
ion
(M
ola
r)
Organic Clay Acid9/1 mud acidClay Acid3/1 mud acid
58
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Core Flow Testing9/1 Mud Acid
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1 0 0
1 2 0
1 4 0
0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 5 0
T im e (m in )
Per
mea
bili
ty (
md
)
6 % N a C lF re s h W a te r3 % N H 4 C l1 5 % H C L9 /1 M u d A c id
Potential Fine Migration after Acidizing
30
59
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Core Flow TestingOCA
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0 0
6 0 0
7 0 0
8 0 0
9 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 6 0
T im e (m in )
Per
mea
bili
ty (
md
)
6 % N a C lF re s h W a te r3 % N H 4 C l1 5 % H C lO C A
Fines stabilized
60
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Placement1. NH4Cl preflush (25-50 gpf)
2. 10% Acetic Acid (75-100 gpf)
3. OCA (100-200 gpf)
4. NH4Cl overflush (3-4 feet radially)
5. Diverter
6. Repeat 2-5 as required
No Shut-in Required
NH4Cl
25-50 gal/ft
OCA
100-200 gal/ft
10% Acetic Acid
75-100 gal/ft
NH4Cl w/ U66
25-50 gal/ft
31
61
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
DifferentiationRecomended Procedure
Low Temperature A 5% NH4Cl PreflushNon Sensitive Clays A B D H ILow Clay Content B HCl Preflush
Low Temperature C Organic Acid PreflushNon Sensitive Clays A B D E G High Clay Content D Mud Acid
Low Temperature E Clay AcidSensitive Clays A C F H IAny Clay Content F Organic Clay Acid
High Temperature G Shut InSensitive Clays A C F H IAny Clay Content H 5% NH4Cl Postflush
I Immediate Flow Back
Mud Acid
Clay Acid
OCA HT
OCA
62
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Case History #1 - GOM
• Deep water turbidite sand
• 11,000’ TVD, BHST 175 F
• Frac-Pac completion
• Permeability - 400 to 1600 md
• 5% Zeolite
• Compaction - 20 - 30% perm reduction
• Increasing skins - higher drawdowns
11,592’
12,141’
11,928’
12,060’
Well #1Well #1Well #1Well #1 Well#2Well#2Well#2Well#2
BeforeBeforeBeforeBefore AfterAfterAfterAfter BeforeBeforeBeforeBefore AfterAfterAfterAfter
BOPDBOPDBOPDBOPD 775775775775 1034103410341034 218218218218 1045104510451045
MCFDMCFDMCFDMCFD 498498498498 547547547547 216216216216 837837837837
Production levels sustained for more than 1 year
32
63
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
220220220220 245245245245 270270270270 295295295295 320320320320 345345345345 370370370370
Job Time (Minutes)
0000
1000100010001000
2000200020002000
3000300030003000
4000400040004000
5000500050005000
Pre
ssu
re -
psi
0
10
Inje
ctio
n R
ate
In
jec
tion
Ra
te
Inje
ctio
n R
ate
In
jec
tion
Ra
te -- --
(BP
M)
(BP
M)
(BP
M)
(BP
M)
Treating Pressure - psi
Injection Rate - BPM
Pump OCA
Prime Pumps
Start PostFlush
Start Displacement
Increase Rate
End of Treatment
Acid at Perfs
4
2
6
8
Case History 1: GOMCase History 1: GOMCase History 1: GOMCase History 1: GOM
64
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Case History #4- Venezuela• Temp: 140 – 235 °F
• Reservoir Pressure: 950 – 1400 psi
• Reservoir Permeability: 100 - 300 mD
• Depth: 2900 -4200 ft
• Gravel Packed with sand 20/40
Formation lithology: Quartz: 48%-56%Mica: 3%-11%K-Feldspar: 1%-3%Kaolinite: 28%-36%Smectite: 1.4%-2.3%Illite: 1%-2.5%Chlorite: 1.1%-3%%Zeolites: 1.2%
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
0 30 60 90 120
Time after Treatment (days)
Ave
rag
e O
il P
rod
, BO
PD
Average Before Average Expected
Average Actual M ud Acid Treatments
33
65
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Case History #5- Pakistan
Lowered FWHP ~400 psi Lowered FWHP ~400 psi Lowered FWHP ~400 psi Lowered FWHP ~400 psi
Maintain production at 50 MMscfdMaintain production at 50 MMscfdMaintain production at 50 MMscfdMaintain production at 50 MMscfd
Formation lithology: Formation lithology: Formation lithology: Formation lithology:
Quartz:Quartz:Quartz:Quartz: 49%49%49%49%----60%60%60%60%
Mica:Mica:Mica:Mica: 1%1%1%1%----3%3%3%3%
Feldspar:Feldspar:Feldspar:Feldspar: 1%1%1%1%----6%6%6%6%
Smectite:Smectite:Smectite:Smectite: 1.4%1.4%1.4%1.4%----2.3%2.3%2.3%2.3%
Glauconite:Glauconite:Glauconite:Glauconite: 1%1%1%1%
Chlorite:Chlorite:Chlorite:Chlorite: 7%7%7%7%----10%10%10%10%
Siderite:Siderite:Siderite:Siderite: 7%7%7%7%----20%20%20%20%
FeFeFeFe----DolomiteDolomiteDolomiteDolomite 0%0%0%0%----7%7%7%7%
• Temp: 340 Temp: 340 Temp: 340 Temp: 340 °°°°FFFF
• Reservoir Pressure: 4300 psiReservoir Pressure: 4300 psiReservoir Pressure: 4300 psiReservoir Pressure: 4300 psi
• Reservoir Permeability: 160 mDReservoir Permeability: 160 mDReservoir Permeability: 160 mDReservoir Permeability: 160 mD
• Perfs: Perfs: Perfs: Perfs: 3318.5m to 3328.0m3318.5m to 3328.0m3318.5m to 3328.0m3318.5m to 3328.0m
• Gravel Packed with sand 20/40Gravel Packed with sand 20/40Gravel Packed with sand 20/40Gravel Packed with sand 20/40
• Acetic acid and OCA w/ VES diverterAcetic acid and OCA w/ VES diverterAcetic acid and OCA w/ VES diverterAcetic acid and OCA w/ VES diverter
Pre-Stimulation
Post-Stimulation
66
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Organic Fluoboric Acid: Conclusions
• OCA provides safe stimulation of sensitive formations
– Zeolites, Chlorites and high temp formations
– High clay content
• OCA provides deeper penetration
• Undesirable precipitates are minimized
• Fines Migration is controlled
• No shut in required
34
67
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Sandstone Acidizing Conclusions• Damage identification determines the types of acid and other solvents used.
• Fluid selection for a mud acid treatment is based on permeability and mineralogy.
• A knowledge of the chemical reactions involved between acids with formation minerals and connate fluids is required.
• Appropriate volumes of preflushes and overflushes help preventincompatibilities.
• The primary reaction of mud acid with silt and clay occurs very fast.
• Secondary and tertiary reactions do not contribute to damage removal.
• Hydrated silica (silica gel) is normally not a damaging precipitate.
• Retarded acid with silt and clay control properties are required in sandstone reservoirs with production declines.
• Acid sensitive sandstone reservoirs cannot be treated with a conventional mud acid treatment, i.e. they require a organic fluoboric acid system.
• Although guidelines exist for volume selection a numerical simulator is recommended to quantify acid volumes.
68
Matrix Stimulation Engineering Solutions
Matrix Stimulation: Sandstone
Sandstone Stages
1. Pre-acid Preflush
Fluids @ End of Treatment??
4 3 2 13. Main Treating Fluid
2. Acid Preflush
4. Overflush
5. Diverter Stage
StimCADE Demo