T2 B6 1-9-04 Meeting w Marcus and Dunne Fdr- Entire Contents- Emails- Notes- List of Outstanding Doc Requests 987

8/14/2019 T2 B6 1-9-04 Meeting w Marcus and Dunne Fdr- Entire Contents- Emails- Notes- List of Outstanding Doc Requests …

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/t2-b6-1-9-04-meeting-w-marcus-and-dunne-fdr-entire-contents-emails-notes- 1/14

KevinScheid

From:Sent:To:Cc:Subject:

1 9/11 Closed byStatute |

Tuesday, November 25, 2003 2:13 PM

Dan. Levin®usdoj.gov;! 9/11closed by sta tu te |

[Pwd: Missing Documents]

Missing Documents

(3.04 KB)Kevin: this is the note I sent you last week on this this is further to my

previous You should be aware that we are working down a list of priority issues while we

are also attempting to fulfill your requirements so we appreciate your patience.

(working down your 'missing documents" paper)

1 sent you a response on DR#1—we are comfortable with our previous responses, should you

have further questions or concerns please let me know & I"11 arrange some time with the

CFO staff.

DR#5--Its not fair to say we've been tasked on this since May on this one as you just

asked us to reinstate our search for these particular items. The DCI Review Group (DRG)

will be working this request.

DRG has (since our meeting) been focusing on the Comm'n's highest priority items, the

SEIBs and the WH request regarding the PDB so that we could get those ready, they've just

completed that tasking. They will have to do the work on DCI DR#5 to the extent that we

can evern resurrect any of these materials. They are currently at work on the Comm'n's

2nd priority issue, the CIRs for Dieter Snell and the PC/DC/CSG materials for Mike Hurley.

I'll talk with DRG on Monday and see if we can get you an estimated production schedule on

this item as well as the other items they are responsible for below.

DR#8:

Item 8: We have produced docs on this

Item 11: We have produced docs on this

Item 17: as per ray previous, we'll have nothing additionally for you here. Item 20: with

the amendment of your request we have production on this & it should be to you shortly.Item 30: We have additional production on this item & it should be with you shortly. Item

36; as per my previous, we'll have nothing additionally for you here other than what is

currently avaiblable on the reading room. Item 14: CMS is coordinating with the

Administration regarding production of this item. Item 16: The DCIDs you requested have

been supplied and are being processed for production you should have them shortly. You

will also receive the rescinded DCIDs that you clarified were wanted at our last meeting.

Item 19: We appreciate your clarification of this request, that you actually wanted the

underlying documents. This will have to come from DRG. Item 22: We will have nothing

additional for you here. Item 24: We will have nothing additioanl for you here. Item 29:

This will come from DRG. Items 34 & 37: Will be worked by DRG to the extent deemed

necessary. DCI DR#10, item 3: This has been produced.



KevinScheid

From:Sent:To:Cc:Subject:

| 9/11 Closed byStatute |

Tuesday, November25, 2003 4:08Kevin Scheid

Steve DunneRe: [Fwd: Missing Documents]

PM

I'll talk to DRG & to Mr. Giza on Monday and we'll see what we can do about getting you adrop dead date on the few remaining items.

Kevin Scheid wrote:

9 / 1 1 C l o s e d b y S t a t u t e

^ ^ ^ ^ j

> Thanks for the update. My screw-up... sorry I didn't catch your> previous email.>

> We need to close out these requests as soon as possible, i.e., pick a

> drop dead date. Of the several items that are still in production

> (e.g., #14, #20, #29, #30, #37), when do you expect the Community to

> be completed? Can we pick December 15 as the final delivery date for> these items?

> KJS

>

> From:I 9/11 Closed by Statute |

> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 2:13 M

> To: Kevin Scheid> Cc: Dan.Levin@USdQ-1 .oov:I9/nClosed by Statute|

> Subject: [Fwd: issing Documents]>

> Kevin: this is the note I sent you last week on this this is

> further to my previous You should be aware that we are working down

> a list of priority issues while we are also attempting to fulfill your

> requirements so we appreciate your patience.>

> (working down your 'missing documents" paper)

> I sent you a response on DR#l--we are comfortable with our previous> responses, should you have further questions or concerns please let me

> know & I'll arrange some time with the CFO staff.>

> DR#5--Its not fair to say we've been tasked on this since May on this

> one as you just asked us to reinstate our search for these particular

> items. The DCI Review Group (DRG) ill be working this request.>

> DRG has (since our meeting) been focusing on the Comm'n's highest

> priority items, the SEIBs and the WH request regarding the PDB so that

> we could get those ready, they've just completed that tasking. They

> will have to do the work on DCI DR#5 to the extent that we can evern

> resurrect any of these materials. They are currently at work on the

> Comm'n's 2nd priority issue, the CIRs for Dieter Snell and the

> PC/DC/CSG materials for Mike Hurley. I'll talk with DRG on Monday and

> see if we can get you an estimated production schedule on this item as> well as the other items they are responsible for below.>

> DR#8:>

> Item 8: We have produced docs on this

> Item 11: We have produced docs on this

> Item 17: as per my previous, we'll have nothing additionally for you

> here. Item 20: With the amendment of your request we have production

> on this & it should be to you shortly.



> Item 30: We have additional production on this item & it should be with

> you shortly.

> Item 36; as per my previous, we'll have nothing additionally for you

> here other than what is currently avaiblable on the reading room.

> Item 14: CMS is coordinating with the Administration regarding

> production of this item.

> Item 16: The DCIDs you requested have been supplied and are being

> processed for production you should have them shortly. You will also

> receive the rescinded DCIDs that you clarified were wanted at our last

> meeting.

> Item 19: We appreciate your clarification of this request, that you

> actually wanted the underlying documents. This will have to come from> DRG.

> Item 22: We will have nothing additional for you here.

> Item 24: We will have nothing additioanl for you here.

> Item 29: This will come from DRG.

> Items 34 & 37: Will be worked by DRG to the extent deemed necessary.

> DCI DR#10, item 3: This has been produced.



M ail : : INBOX: FW: DCI DR#19 Page 1 of 1

136.83MB / 476.84MB (28.70%)

Date: Tue,25 Nov2003 12:47:08 -0500

From: Kevin Scheid <[email protected]>^

To: "' <[email protected]>4?

Subject: FW: DCI DR#19

Team --

9/11 Closed by Statute

Please re^/ii.ciosed by statuteients onour recent Document request and let me

know what you tninK. I will get back to her with a coordinated answer.Thanks.

K JS

From:l 9/11 Cl os e d by Statute I

Sent .-Tuesday, November 25, 2003 11:07 AM

To: Kevin Scheid

Subject: DCI D R # 1 9

K e v i n :

#2: We believe we have already produced to Susan Ginsburg the MOU you

have requested--if this is not what you are looking for please let us

know.

#3 Our records reflect that we have already produced both DO Strategic

Plans for 2005 &2010

#6 is a request for an NSA originated document, we will coordinate with

NSA regarding production.

#9 is the very similar to your earlier request in DCI DR#8 --CMS

believes it has already produced everyting they have, but will go back

to their people and ask whether there is anything further

#18 there are no additional documents, you have the only annual

strategic intelligence reviews on CT that were done in that time

period--you have 2 and those are the only reports of that kind.

#19 CMS asks what are you really looking for here? National Sigint

priorities, HUMINT (youshould already have), IMINT what exactly is it

that you want?--this seems very broad to them.

http://kinesis.swishmail.com/webmail/imp/message.php?actionID= 148&mailbox=INBO... 11 /25/2003



.v ;9/ll Closed by Statute

Gordon Lederman |

From: Steve Dunne jSent: Friday, Decem ber 19, 2003 3:45 PMTo: Team 2;Team 3 ICc: Front Office ISubject: FW: CIA Outstanding Document Requests for Prioritization

Teams 2 and 3: Her<9/11[closed bY statytejonse tp tnelistof outstanding document requestsyougave us earlier today. Pltiimy lex us know if you have any comments on her report.Thanks. Steve ;

T-i (final

From: I 9/11Closed by Statute

Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 3:15 PM iTo: Steve Dunne j

C c : Front Office i

Subject: Re: CIA Outstanding Document Requests for Prioritization

steve: thanks, right, as I said in my note; to you—the staff's list WILL differ from myPrioritization list because they don't yet; ave all the documents I've located. Afterdocuments are located many require redaction or interagency coordination as well asadminstrative processing which |"~ "1& the paralegals carry out—this accounts for

the lag time, but for my purposes these do no require prioritization--!'m done with themat that point—its essentially only a clerical function that has to be carried out fromthat point forward.

My interest in seeking prioritization on the items I listed in my note to you is for myown purposes as to where to focus the search efforts first. The administrative processingis a wholely separate function and documents will be produced as processing is completed.

DCI DR#5: Items 38, 43, 45 & 46. We have not been able to locate thesedocuments which were produced to the Joint Inquiry staff. Unfortunately because of theway these were indexed we don't have sufficient information to search further, if Congressis able to give you further information on these documents we'll be happy to search again,but this information has not been sufficient for us to be able to recover these docs.

DCI DR#8: 14c & 19 are in the process of being produced—this is all we have on theseitems. 34 & 37 were put on hold at the request of the Comm'n staff at our two meeting with

you on the doc requests and our mfrs from these 2 meetings indicate that the staff wantedto consider further how to refine their requests for these two items—so we shouldcontinue to hold. If that determination has changed and you have refined request, pleaselet us know & we'd appreciate prioritization of these request as well.

DR#16: is listed in my note as an item to be prioritized. A substantial amount ofmaterial is in coordination for production, I am working on the sitreps which will also beproduced under this DR--there is one additional place I need to search on this requestwhich is why I listed it on my note to you as a DR requiring prioritization.

DR#18 almost all of these items have been located, they only require administrativeprocessing, redactions/bates-stamping/interagency coord etc. which is why I did not listthem on my listing of DRs requiring prioritization. I have a little more searching I needto do on item 6 and I spoke with Scott Allan about that on the phone yesterday (or the daybefore). Additionally, Scott tells me that he won't be ready for the interviews until the

second week in January.

DR#19--the items I listed requiring prioritization are the only items for which I'm stillsearching--the other items have already been located and are being processed.

Hope this helps,r~9/ll Closed byStatute \eDunnewrote:

c l o s e d by statutephanks for your memo; we are still considering our response.> Our teams headed by Mike Hurley and Kevin Scheid have come up with a



> list of requests (see below) for which they believe they have not

> received any documents; to the extent these are not covered in your

> memo, could you let me know where they stand? Thanks. Steve

> Outstanding requests:

> DR#5: items 38, 43, 45, 46

> DR#8: items 14c, 9, 34, 37

> DR#16: item 1

> DR#18: items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

> DR#19: items 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,

> 19

> Fromj 9/11 Closed by Statute |

> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 3:17 PM

> To: Steve Dunne; Dan Marcus«™.»»»™»_ ^ ^ ^ ™,> Cc: Dan.LevinQusdoj .gov,\n closed by s t a t u t e I

> Subject: CIA Outstanding Document Requests for Prioritization

> Steve & Dan: Thanks for agreeing to take a look at our outstanding

> document requests in an effort to assist us by prioritizing. The

> listing is attached. Please let me know if vnn havp any questions and

> thanks so much for your help,! 9 / 1 1 closed by s t a t u t e I



Page 1 o f2

Gordon Lederman

From: Dan Marcus

Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 7:28 PM

To: Gordon Lederman

Subject: FW: status of requests

Original Mf>«;<aop

FrOmJ 9/ll Closed by Statute

Sent;Vionoav, i-epruarv yy . MW /;ibPM9/11 Closed by Statute

Cc:"Steve Dunne; Dan Marcus; Kevin Scheid

Subject; Re: status of requests

Steve, ju st a few notes to 9/n closed by statute; com ments regard ing th e item s requested by team #2:

1) Fo r items 34 and 37 of DR #8, my notes ind icate that the Comm'n ha s agreed (since at least ou r 17 Ju l03 meeting) that these items are in a "hold" status, i.e. that CIA need not provide anything further unlesswe rec'd spec ific requests.

2) For item 6 of DR #1 9 ,my 17 Dec 03 forwarding letter to the Comm 'n states: "The d oc ument > /

responsive toItem No. 6 . . .is a report prepared by a former official of . . . [NSA] conc erning f) I^

management of the [1C]... We are unable to locate a copy of this doc ument in CIA files and haveadvised b y NS A's focal point fo r Comm ission matters that NSA has been unab le to locate th ed o c u m e n t . . . " ,

3) Please note that th e doc ument produced to theC om m'n on 15 Dec 03, in response to item no. 33 ofDRrff5, is also responsive to item nosT 11 and 16 of DR #19. The document produced as 0500010 on 15Dec 03 is the'final veTsiorroTme draft requested by item 11 of DR #19.

9/11 Closed by Statute;;

by statutejease chime in if you have something additional/different—from my optic this iswhat Ihave-BELOW IN ALL CAPSJ 9/11 closed bv statute |

Steve D unne wrote:

9/11 closed by statuteTeam 2 reports that production on the following requests is

incomplete; could you tell us where you stand? We may be asked about this

at the Commission meeting tomorrow. Thanks. SteveDR 5, Item 43 WE WERE NOTSUCCESSFUL IN RECOVERING THIS ITEM-WE TRIED,

BUT DONT HAVE COPIES OFEVERYTHING GIVEN TO THE JOINT INQUIRY—IFWE

RECEIVE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT MIGHT HELP USLOCATE THE

DOCUMENT WE'LL BEHAPPY TO TRY AGAIN, BUT AT THIS POINT WE DONT

BELIEVE WE'LL RECOVER THIS.

DR 5, Item 45WE WERE NOT SUCCESSFUL IN RECOVERING THIS ITEM--WE TRIED,

BUT DONT HAVE COPIES OF EVERYTHING GIVEN TO THE JOINT INQUIRY—IF WE

RECEIVE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT MIGHT HELP US LOCATE THE

2/10/2004



Page 2 of 2

DOCUMENT WE'LL BE HAPPY TO TRY AGAIN, BUT AT THIS POINT WE DONT

BELIEVE WE'LL RECOVER THIS.

DR 8, Item 34PUT ON HOLD AT BOTH OF OUR STATUS MEETINGS BY THE STAFF

AND WE WERE TOLD NOT TO PRODUCE.

DR 8, Item 37PUT ON HOLD AT BOTH OF OUR STATUS MEETINGS BY THE STAFF

AND WE WERE TOLD NOT TO PRODUCE.

***DESPITE THE FACT THAT 37 WAS PUT ON HOLD WE'VEPRODUCED A BUNCH OF FININTEL UNDER THIS ITEM ANYWAY.

DR 19, Item 6WE COULD NOT LOCATE THIS ITEM, NSADIDNT HAVE ANY LUCK

FINDING IT EITHER

DR 19,Item 11 - this is of particular interest to CommissionersWE PRODUCED A

FINAL ONTHIS, WE SPOKE TO DAN MARCUS ABOUT THIS ITEM WHEN HE CAME

OUT FOR A STATUS MEETING.

DR 19, Item 13WE TALKED WITH DAN MARCUS ABOUT THIS ITEM DURING A

STATUS MEETING HERE. HE TOLD US HE'D GET BACK TO US IF WE NEEDED TO DO

SOMETHING FURTHER

DR 19, Item 14ACCORDING TO ALL INFORMATION WE HAVE THERE IS NO WRITTEN

REPORT, DCI/COS TALKED WITH MR. KERR & WITH MR. PAVnT-NEITHER

REMEMBER A WRITTEN PRODUCT HAVING BEEN DONE-NO SEARCHES HAVE

YIELDED SUCH A PRODUCT.

DR 19, Item 16OUR UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THIS ITEM IS THE SAME THING AS

ITEM 11, WE PRODUCED A FINAL OF THISALREADY.

DR 19, Item 19WE SPOKE WITH DAN MARCUS ABOUT THIS ITEM WHEN HE WAS

HERE FOR A STATUS MEETING—CMS NEEDED MORE INFORMATION RE: WHAT

TEAM 2 WAS LOOKING FOR HERE--WHAT TYPES OF PRIORITIES OR IS THIS JUST

ANOTHER WAYOF ASKING AGAIN FOR THE PRIORITIES FRAMEWORK? I SENT

SEVERAL NOTES TO KEVIN ASKING FOR FURTHER INFORMATION DATED: 23

NOVEMBER 2003 AND 17 DECEMBER 2003 AND NEVER HEARD ANYTHING FURTHER.

2/10/2004



Pag e l of 2

Gordon Lederman

From: Steve Dunne


To: Team 2

Cc: Dan Marcus

Subject: FW: status of requests

FYI.

Original Message

Fro 9 / l l Closed by Statute


To; Steve DunneClosed by Statutepan MafCUS

Subject: Re: status of requests

9/llClosedbyStatutejeasechjmjnjfyQU

nave-BELOW IN ALL CAP

Steve Dunne wrote:

f

something additional/different—from my optic this is what I

9 / 1 1 c l o s e d b y s t a t u t e

| 9/11 c l o s e d by s t a t u t e |Team 2 reports that production on the following requests is

incomplete; could you tell uswhere you s tand? We may be asked about this at the

Commission meeting tomorrow. Thanks. SteveDR 5, Item 43 WE WERE NOT SUCCESSFUL IN RECOVERING THIS ITEM-WE TRIED, BUT

DONT HAVE COPIESOF EVERYTHING GIVENTO THE JOINT INQUIRY—IF WERECEIVE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT MIGHT HELP US LOCATE THE DOCUMENT WE'LLBE

HAPPY TO TRY AGAIN, BUT ATTHIS POINT WE DONT BELIEVE WE'LL RECOVER THIS.

DR 5, Item 45WE WERE NOTSUCCESSFUL IN RECOVERING THIS ITEM-WE TRIED, BUT

DONT HAVE COPIES OF EVERYTHING GIVENTO THE JOINT INQUIRY—IF WE RECEIVE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT MIGHT HELP US LOCATE THE DOCUMENTWE'LL BE

HAPPY TO TRY AGAIN, BUT AT THIS POINT WE DONT BELIEVE WE'LL RECOVER THIS.

, Item 34PUT ON HOLD ATBOTH OF OURSTATUS MEETINGS BY THE STAFF AND WE

o - W E R E TOLD NOT TO PRODUCE.

~DR 8, Item 37PUTON HOLD AT BOTH OF OUR STATUS MEETINGS BY THE STAFF AND WE

WERE TOLD NOT TO PRODUCE.

/*>*5

***DESPITE THE FACT THAT 37 WAS PUT ON HOLD WE'VE PRODUCED A

BUNCH OF FININTEL UNDER THIS ITEM ANYWAY.

DR 19, Item 6WE COULD NOT LOCATE THIS ITEM, NSADIDNT HAVE ANY LUCK FINDING

IJEITHER . . .

DR 19,Item 11 - this is of particular interest to C6mmissionersWE-pRODUCED~A~FINAL ON 'WESPOKETODAN MARCUS ABOUT THIS ITEM WHEN HE CAME OUT FOR A STATUS___

bR-19ritemT3WE'TALKED WITH DAN MARCUS ABOUT THIS" ITEM DURING A STATUS

MEETING HERE. HE TOLD US HE'D GE T BACK TO US IF WE NEEDED TO DO SOMETHING

:THER

L. DR 19, Item 14ACCORDINGTO ALL INFORMATION WE HAVE THERE IS NO WRITTEN

C REPORT, DCI/COS TALKEDWITH MR. KERR & WITH MR. PAVITT-NEITHER REMEMBER A

2/9/2004



Page 2 o f2

rrC D Fcn

WRITTEN PRODUCT HAVING BEEN DONE-NO SEARCHES HAVE YIELDED SUCH A

PRODUCT.

DR 19, Item 160UR UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THIS ITEM IS THE SAMETHING AS ITEM

11,WE PRODUCED A FINAL OFTHIS ALREADY.

J

R 19, Item 19WE SPOKE WITH DANMARCUS ABOUT THIS ITEM WHEN HE WAS HERE

OR A STATUS MEETING—CMS NEEDED MORE INFORMATION RE: WHAT TEAM 2 WAS

DOKING FORHERE--WHAT TYPES OF PRIORITIES OR IS THIS JUST ANOTHER WAY OF

SKING AGAIN FOR THEPRIORITIES FRAMEWORK?I SENT SEVERAL NOTES TO KEVIN

SKING FORFURTHER INFORMATION DATED: 23 NOVEMBER 2003 AND 17 DECEMBER

003 AND NEVER HEARD ANYTHING FURTHER.

2/9/2004



TTiomas H KeanCHAIR

Lee H. HamiltonV I C E C H A I R

Richard Ben-Veniste

Max Qeland

Fred F. Fielding

Jamie S.Gorelkk

Slade Gorton

John Lehman

TimothyJ. Roemer

James R Thompson

Philip D. ZelikowK X E C U T 1 V E D I R E C T O R

FAX COVER SHEET

Tg/n closed by StatuTeSHCral Counsel, CIAi i • . : . ' . . : 'Fax No.: 9 / 1 1 Closed by Statute

From: Steven M. Dunne . : ' > j

Deputy G eneral Cou nsel

(202)331-4067 l ! :'

fax (202) 296^5545 ; '

Date: December 23,2003

Pages, including cover sheet: 3

9 / 1 1 Closed by Statute |- As discussed at the meeting earlier today, here is

a list of outstanding document requests. We look forward to

working with you to get all of these requests fulfilled as soon as

possible. Please call Dan Marcus or. me with an y questions. Thanks.GA«*A ' V ''''• - • • ' 'Steve

T E L (202) 331-4060

F A X (202) 296-5545

www.9-1lcommission.gov



. . t

OUTSTANDING DCI DOCUMENT REQUESTSDecember 23,2003' • • • ' '

Document Request No'. 8 (issued July 3,-2003) • . ' ; ; .

€ > . a**Item 3 - briefing packages for D CI d n d D D C I fo r N SC meetings*r ^*Item 4 - presentations on UBL, a f Qa'ida given by D CI to PO T US or VPOTUSl

**Item 14c- DCI's intelligence priprities frarnework

**Item 19 - DCI's declaration ofwar; on terrorismx Q**Item 33 - CTC brief ings for DCI on UBL, al Qa'ida,etc.' i,-*0' ' • ' • ' • '• ; •—~~—' "

f-WVJr ' ' ' ' '-Docum ent Request No. 1 1 (issued August; 7, 2003)

Item 17 - FAArequests fo r intelligence on (aviation security issues

Document Reques t No . 13 (issued September 3 , 2003)

- Item 2 - intelligence reports used to " produce n e r f a i n terrorist f inancing reports

'ocument Request N o. 16 (issued October 8 , 2003)


1 - 4pcuments or presentations given to certain N SC officials on UBL, a l Q.

Docum ent Request No. 17 (October 22,2 iItem 3 - reports re terrorists as refugees or asyleesItem 21 - reports reentry of terrorists through specified borders

**Item 22 - docum ents regarding a specific border control project

;.' • < ' • ' i ~Document Request No. 18 (issued November 6,2003) /

**Item 1 - M F R s and other docum ents sum m arizing N SC meetingsA Items 2 - 6 - documents on Sudanese issues *

T~DCLbriefing materials onth e

ft

Documentltecjuest lSfo/19 (November 24, 2003)/^ ~ Item 1 - submiss ion to Joint Inquiry re studies of 1C reformN . **Item 4 - analysis of al Qa'ida comsec capability — f^) Item 5 - reports onN ational Intelligence W arning System

> l Item 6 - N SA D D O report on management of 1CItem 7 - report on DCI's collection authorities

- **Item 8 - mem o recomm ending creation o f theCTC —^

j\m9 - collection oranalysis strategies dii UBL, alQa'ida, etc.'' Item 10 - communicat ions from theDCI t oD/NSA onUBL and al Qa'ida

* * I t e n f l l ~ d r a f t N I E o n ^ a l Q a ' i d a ; : '"''" "' * ^memo on N fO fo r Terrorism and warni

o n t h e T T I C ^ Jy J^Items Wl ?- reports on CIA's couriterterronsm programs

**Item 16V documentsXpflecting die prioritization o f terrorist threats







Document Request No. 19 (November 24>1003) --continued

/ 2-/\l ft Item 17 - examples of "red cell" products

- \vu--^Jtern 18-Annual Strategic Intelligence Reviews on Counterte.rrqrism

-<& *tem19 - documents articulating intelligence priorities

Document Request No. 22 (issued December 8, 2003)

**Items 1-6 - documents relating to passports andpassport analysis

Items 7-16 - documents relating topassports and passport analyst

£_ **Item 17 - annual planning documents


**Item 13 - intelligence analysis oncertain NGOs


**Items 1-3 - documents regarding certain terrorist communications^

-—""i

Document Request No. 25 (issued December 19, 2003

**Item 1 - copy of Mike S.binderofdocuments

(** indicates highest priority items)