Upload
julian-weber
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TOWARDS A EUROPEAN FRAMEWORKFOR CSR PARTNERSHIPS BETWEEN COMPANIES AND CITIZENS’ ORGANIZATIONS
Giovanni MoroFONDACA – Active Citizenship Foundation
Politeia Forum, Milan, 14 September 2007
CONTENT European paradoxes Partnerships as a key issue The Not Alone project The partnerships’ profile The essentials of studied partnerships Conclusions on the research Suggestions for guidelines coming from the
consultation of the partners Developments: the Lisbon Minus 3 project
2
G. M
oro, 14 Sept 2007
EUROPEAN PARADOXES … First paradox: it does exist a European dimension on
CSR discourse, but not a European dimension of responsible companies
Main CSR actions take place at local level and at global level (900 European and only 100 US companies are members of the UN Global Compact)
Some “Absence indicators”: Among the members of the EC Multistakeholder Forum
only 6 out of 54 were entrepreneurs European companies are rarely co-funders of EC
supported projects Companies’ Brussels offices are usually engaged in PR
and lobbying activities only Often US multinationals have their offices on Europe in
the USA 3
G. M
oro, 14 Sept 2007
EUROPEAN PARADOXES … Second paradox: The EU is a market, but seems unable
to give place to CSR processes What do companies do with the European Union?
They ask protection against unfair competition (China, - the “revenge of globalization”)
They use it as a battlefield among national interests (banks, energy, etc.)
At the best, they seem consider it as a framework of transnational initiatives
Summarizing: they seem considering the EU either as a open internal market or a protected market, but not as a real single market
4
G. M
oro, 14 Sept 2007
EUROPEAN PARADOXES Third paradox: consumer-citizens are European, but
not the companies; consumer-citizens are cross-border, but not the companies
A possible vitious circle: companies are far from the European dimension because of its weakness; but it will remain weak without the support of companies.
How to deal with: promoting a EU framework for CSR based on concrete practices of companies and their stakeholders
5
G. M
oro, 14 Sept 2007
PARTNERSHIP AS A KEY ISSUE Partnerships with Autonomous Citizens’ Organizations
(ACOs) at national level a relevant source for this framework
Partnerships: actors coming from different sectors share objectives, resources, responsibilities and risks to achieve common interest results that no one of the actors could do by alone.
It is one of the most challenging CSR activities because of the close link between companies and stakeholders.
After the failure of Multistakeholder Forum, the EC has called companies and their stakeholders for partnerships, but without any further specification.
6
G. M
oro, 14 Sept 2007
THE NOT ALONE PROJECT The FONDACA research on partnership (developing the Zadek
and Copenhagen Centre model) involving autonomous citizens’ organizations (ACOs) partnering with the public sector and private companies
The Active Citizenship Network policy on European active citizenship
The research: FONDACA, Active Citizenship Network and national partners Between July 2005 and June 2006 36 success partnerships in 8 countries (Austria, Cyprus, Germany,
Hungary, Italy, Malta, Poland, Slovenia, United Kingdom) analyzed A questionnaire submitted to representatives of the both parts
Focus on: Basis of p. Management of p. Evolution of p. P. effects Definition of a European “partnership profile” Suggestions for European guidelines based on experience
7
G. M
oro, 14 Sept 2007
PARTNERSHIPS’ PROFILE Projects developed through partnerships are
primarily: aimed at tackling welfare and environmental
concerns, as well as promoting the empowerment of young people;
developed at the national, less at the local, and not at the European level;
medium or long term; managed by marketing departments or public
relations offices (for companies) and by the entire organization (for ACOs);
either of a value of less than 50,000 or more than 500,000 €
supported by other investors.8
G. M
oro, 14 Sept 2007
PARTNERSHIPS’ PROFILE / 2 In general, studied partnerships are:
between companies that have a CSR strategy and ACOs that are more focused on promoting concrete gains for communities, and which have the main common goal to address societal problems;
stable and flexible relationships between one company and one organization, that have already been involved in prior collaborations and which have been started with neither the participation of second-degree structures, nor the support of external intermediaries;
equal relationships, where rights and responsibilities are defined and decision making process, as well as responsibilities, are shared, but where ACOs face more internal resistances in partnering with business;
relations guaranteed by formal technical and juridical tools and managed with a high level of personal relations;
characterized, on the one hand by internal communication tools which imply more personal rather than interpersonal relations and, on the other, by external tools, which are primarily specific rather than general (as social reports); 9
G. M
oro, 14 Sept 2007
PARTNERSHIPS’ PROFILE / 3 with a minor involvement of the intended beneficiaries in
the decision making process; more about human than financial resources invested by
both sides; decided and represented by senior management; facilitated by both partners’ communication or public
relations departments; evaluated more by companies, often separately; positively evolving relationships - with no significant
obstacles or conflicts - which are managed through communication and mutual recognition;
relationships that create more internal and less mutual benefits, increase competencies (relational and operational) and generate many unexpected positive impacts, primarily linked to strengthening partners’ cooperation.
10
G. M
oro, 14 Sept 2007
THE ESSENTIALS OF STUDIED PARTNERSHIPS At the core business (direct impact on
identity and value of actors and managed at the top level)
Coming from prior relations Not yet an ordinary activity Flexibility, formality and personal relations Trend to equality Investment of human rather financial
resources Long-term, stable relationship Added value and incremental character (they
tend to grow thanks to their own development)
11
G. M
oro, 14 Sept 2007
CONCLUSIONS ON THE RESEARCH Partnerships as CSR “technologies”:
On the companies’ side: linking companies and stakeholders in a common framework able to generate a significant impact inside companies and in their reputation, and to enrich their identity, thus increasing their value.
On the stakeholders’ side: enhance the awareness of their role and their ability to interact with companies, thus overcoming prejudices and “standard views” and constructively challenging companies to take corporate social responsibility seriously.
Ambiguities and risks: Actors reluctant to report conflicts Actors reluctant to report power divide situations Lack of involvement of intended beneficiaries Risk of a prevailing paradoxical sense of self-sufficiency
and a self-referential attitude of partnerships12
G. M
oro, 14 Sept 2007
PARTNERS’ SUGGESTIONS ON GUIDELINES Partnerships’ bases:
Relational: transparency, integrity; mutual trust and respect; compatibility btw visions and values; enthusiasm and trust in achieving the goals
Operational: fair selection and evaluation of partners Bulding of partnership
Relational aspects: understanding the partners’ differences and specific needs; commitment of both partners
Managerial aspects: clear and shared objectives from the beginning; clear rules on development and management of p.; avoid too much bureaucracy
Management of partnerships: Relational aspects: dialogue and communication Operational aspects: professional behavior and
competencies; long term p.; ogoing redefinition of rules; respect of agreements, accountability.
13
G. M
oro, 14 Sept 2007
DEVELOPMENTS
The Lisbon Minus 3 project A Partnership Evaluation Matrix, built on the
base of the results of the Not Alone project Tested in 10 EU countries by both sides of
partnerships and by third parties (project’s partner organizations)
To be discussed, amended and validated in a Lisbon conference on 20 and 21 Sept. 2007
To be diffused and supported as a EU framework for the promotion of partnerships as a tool for the development of a stronger European basis for CSR
14
G. M
oro, 14 Sept 2007