THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL DIVERSITY IN GRADUATE ENGINEERING EDUCATIONAdvisory Board Meeting

(“Research Results So Far and Timeline for Surveys” on Agenda)

Erin CredeDepartment of Engineering EducationVirginia Tech

STUDY DESIGNIn ProgressCompleted May 2010 Delayed until Fall 2010 In Progress

Fall 2010

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The research questions guiding this study are:

1. How does the presence of a high percentage of international students influence the culture of graduate-level engineering education communities, particularly related to identity, socialization and ultimately retention of domestic graduate students?

2. To what extent are similar perceptions present among engineering undergraduates, and how do these contribute to enrollment of domestic students into graduate programs?

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

Newcomer

Central Community Member

Socialization

Socialization

Students increase their IDENTITY CAPITAL through the process of SOCIALIZATION as they move from newcomer to more active participants in a COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE

PRELIMINARY QUALITATIVE FINDINGS (GRADUATE)•Informal and peer learning

•Graduate student identity development

•Socialization to graduate research groups

•Structure of graduate engineering research groups

•Differences between highly diverse versus less diverse research groups

The findings from these smaller studies are being used to draft the survey that will be administered during the fall of 2010.

GRADUATE SURVEY CONSTRUCTION•Currently plan on 50, five point Likert style questions along with questions regarding demographic characteristics

•Survey will have several sections originating from either the literature or the qualitative findings

SURVEY CONSTRUCTION

Graduate Student Survey

•Model student learning/satisfaction based on survey sections for both international and US students

•Explore differences between international and domestic students

• Disaggregate by nationality (based on country or groups of countries)

• Consider each of the sections separately (major themes)

• Consider implications for designing more effective work environments for all students

Undergraduate Student Survey

•explore the expectations and potential misconceptions that students have regarding graduate school:

•Currently plan on 25, five point likert style questions along with questions regarding demographic characteristics

• Examine undergraduate student expectations regarding international diversity in graduate school

• Examine potential misconceptions regarding graduate school

PILOT TESTING

Graduate Survey

•The instrument will be given to a sample of approximately VT 30 students twice

• Test/retest reliability• Software functioning• Sample data analysis

•Students from the ethnography research groups will review question wording and content as a second validity measure

Undergraduate Survey

•Administer the instrument at VT to a sample of approximately 30 students

• Software functioning• Sample data analysis

•Students from focus groups will be asked to review the instrument prior to administering

Expert review for both graduate and undergraduate surveys from advisory board

FINAL SURVEY PARTICIPANTSInstitution Engineering Departments Engineering

Graduate Students

Engineering Undergraduate

StudentsVirginia Tech Aerospace, Chemical, Civil, Electrical and

Computer, Industrial and Systems, Materials Science, Mechanical

2,032 5,867

University of Maryland, Baltimore County

Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Systems Engineering

956 1,496

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Aerospace, Chemical, Civil, Electrical and Computer, Industrial and Systems, Materials Science, Mechanical

2,660 5,346

University of Southern California

Aerospace, Chemical, Civil, Electrical and Computer, Mechanical 4,144 1,965

Source: 2010 US News and World Report 2009 ASEE Profiles of Engineering Colleges

SURVEY RELEASE TIMELINEEach institution will have two separate survey links, one for graduate and one for undergraduate

Institution Survey Open First Reminder e-mail

Second Reminder e-mail Survey Close

Virginia Tech September 7 September 16 September 23 September 28University of Maryland, Baltimore County

September 14 September 23 September 30 October 5

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor September 21 September 30 October 7 October 12

University of Southern California September 7 September 16 September 23 September 28

Virginia Tech-classes begin August 23USC-classes begin August 23UMBC-classes begin August 31University of Michigan-classes begin September 7

NEXT STEPS•Begin IRB paperwork-

•Collect Listserv/email information

•Report to NSF -Erin will create summary document this week

•Finalize the draft survey questions -Erin to complete by July 19

•Advisory Board Review of Instrument(s)-completed by August 2

•Complete Pilot Test at VT -week of August 2, second round for graduate students the second week of August

•Sample Analysis and Final Survey Construction- completed by August 25th

•Release Survey in August-September 2010 -based on previous timeline