Upload
justina-russell
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The
Complexity of
Poverty – One
agency’s
response…
Key Responses to Complex Poverty
3. Case
Management
2. Research1. Data
4. Capacity
Building5. Integrated Service
Delivery
ER Database• 2005: very little data.
•2007 a new data system
goes live
•2009 first tranche of
reporting
ER Database: What did
we find• People most at risk of needing ER – being female (63%), Indigenous (11%); relatively
young at 25-49 years (56%); living alone (42%) or sole parents (31%); and living in
public or private rental accommodation (70%).
•Low income– 60% of clients received an income of less than $600 per fortnight.
Almost all households were receiving some sort of benefit – 95%.
•Most households presented with more than one issue – indicating complexity of need
– across the 13,000 clients there were more than 60,000 reasons for presenting.
These issues included accommodation (13% were homeless), financial debt, physical
and mental health, family and relationship breakdown and issues with children.
•There was evidence of spatial poverty – across 113 postcodes 31% derived from just
four postcodes – Campbelltown, Mt Druitt, Wollongong and Liverpool.
ER Database: What was the
impact?• Engagement with government
•a platform for further research in the area and gave ANGLICARE a credible
voice in the public sphere and the advocacy space.
•partially responsible for the release of new funding for ER during the GFC.
•the ER workers themselves became the greatest advocates for data collection
– once they saw the leverage it gave both internally and externally.
•This data collection is ongoing - source for research in relation to particular
people groups, ER longitudinal trends, EAPA and issues around housing and
Newstart. It is regularly interrogated by the research team for advocacy and
policy purposes.
Key Responses to Complex Poverty
3. Case
Management
2. Research1. Data
4. Capacity
Building5. Integrated Service
Delivery
Research based
advocacy• 2002: dedicated policy unit
•2003 use of social exclusion
theory
•2009/10 reports on ER
•2012 food insecurity research
Food Insecurity: Research and
advocacy• Three out of four of all respondents (76%) were
severely food insecure.
•Between one-third and a half of respondents
experienced food insecurity almost every week or
even more frequently during the previous 3
months.
•a third of the sample (31%), who were considered
severely food insecure almost every week.
Food Insecurity: Research and
advocacy• There was anxiety about running out of food
(83%) in a context where three out of four adults
(76%) had run out of food in the last three
months and could not afford to buy more.
•The majority of adults (73%) had cut the size of
their meals or skipped meals (62%).
• 61% of adults had experienced hunger and one
in three adults (37%) did not eat for a whole day.
Food Insecurity: Children
• Almost 80% of children living in food insecure households experienced
some form of food insecurity themselves – even though adults went to
significant lengths to protect their children from the worst effects of
hunger and food deprivation.
•More than one in three children (36%) were severely food insecure and,
for 8% of children, this was a once a week occurrence.
•Adults (83%) spoke of relying on low cost food to feed their children and
78% were concerned that children did not get sufficient variety of foods.
• In some households the size of children’s’ meals were being cut (46%),
children were forced to skip meals (24%) or in the worst case children
did not eat for a whole day (10%). For 7% of households this was a
regular occurrence – weekly or some weeks.
The school wants to
know why the kids
are hungry...It’s
embarrassing. My
kids have no shoes.
He’s come home with
black eyes 'cos he's
the poor kid.
...kids embarrassed, different to other kids.
the kids would
drive me up the
wall 'cos they're
starving!.
Sometimes my daughter will come home from school and want to have her friends over but I can't feed them snacks
Food Insecurity: Coping
• Most adults with children go hungry in order to protect
their children
•Of the 272 adults who completed the child HFSSM questions
for their household, only four respondents (1.5%) revealed
that children in their household were experiencing more
severe food insecurity than adults. The majority of
respondents living with children (55.1%) were living in
households where children fell into a less severe food
insecurity category than the adults.
• Just under half (43.4%) of respondents were living in
households where children and adults fell into the same food
insecurity severity
Not to be able
to feed your
kids is
unforgiveable
I don’t worry if I don’t eat – I
just worry if the kids don’t eat.
If your kids have
got food,
you’re OK.
I buy a little bit of food every day so I know the baby has something to eat that day.
Food Insecurity: Other
interesting facts The research also indicated households most at risk of food insecurity were:
Households on low income (67% on incomes of less than $500 per week)
Disability Support Pension (41%
Newstart (31%)
Not being in paid work (77%)
Renting (78%)
Single parent (31%)
Indigenous (17%)
Nine out of ten households indicated that an unexpected event had pitched them
into financial crisis in the last three months – related to bigger than expected
utility bills, white goods breaking down, a family funeral, return to school
expenses for the children and medical expenses.
Apart from low income other factors also played a role in food insecurity including
not having access to a fridge (10%), not having access to an oven or microwave
(13%) or not having power connected – 8%.
Food Insecurity: What’s it like...violent.
feral. Become unaware of
other people around you
...gets me
cranky, I can
really spit the
dummy,
you just want to go to sleep and never wake up. You’re just living to survive
it's quite depressing and humiliating and makes you feel like you fail at the most
basic of needs
... Feel
sick... just
drinking tea
and water
...I can get moody and tired. Sick in the stomach. Light headed
...worry
me guts
out
Research – its Impact
•Awareness of the issue by
parliament
•Credible advocacy
•Informing the sector
•Basis for further research and
advocacy
Key Responses to Complex Poverty
3. Case
Management
2. Research1. Data
4. Capacity
Building5. Integrated Service
Delivery
Case Management•Wollongong 2010
•Move from crisis management to
case management
•Sustainable Living model
•28 clients, 12 month pilot
•Enhanced independence, well
being, resilience and connection
Key Responses to Complex Poverty
3. Case
Management
2. Research1. Data
4. Capacity
Building5. Integrated Service
Delivery
Capacity Building•launched in 2010.
•an adult community education program which offers groups
and seminars teaching basic living skills, employment and
social skills.
•Since 2010 54 groups and seminars have been run, with an
average of 11 students enrolled in each group or seminar.
•The basic premise of the program is that people experiencing
financial hardship can have a number of issues mitigated
through education, early intervention, increased knowledge
base and increased access to community and service networks.
Capacity BuildingShort term goals – nearly all survey participants
involved in groups finished their involvement with a
strong sense of personal and emotional wellbeing.
Most had built new social connections during their
time on the program, with nearly two-thirds having
built a friendship with someone they thought they
could turn to in times of crisis. Many also had learnt
new life skills such as budgeting and cooking.
Longer term the program seeks to build resilience,
independence and pathways into education and
employment.
Key Responses to Complex Poverty
3. Case
Management
2. Research1. Data
4. Capacity
Building5. Integrated Service
Delivery
Integrated Service
deliveryOld Model
•Multiple entry points
•Multiple intake and assessment
•Overworked ER staff and
volunteers
•Feeling like band aid solutions
Integrated Service
deliveryNew model
•Single entry point
•Five services : ER, NILS, FSP, Step
Up, Financial Counselling
•Intensive case management
•Focus on families with children
•New systems and processes
Integrated Service
delivery
Integrated Service
deliveryImpacts
•Improved staff well being,
reduced stress and anxiety
•More streamlined service
dleivery
•Better longer term sustainable
outcomes for families
Sustainable L:iving
3. Case
Management
2. Research1. Data
4. Capacity
Building5. Integrated Service
Delivery
Questions?