Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FSBPA 15 Feb 2013
Rajesh Srinivas1, Robert Dean2, Michael Trudnak1, Michael Kabiling1, Ashwini Otta3, Rajesh Gaikwad4
1Taylor Engineering, 2University of Florida, 3System Sea, 4 Maharashtra Maritime Board
Sustainable Coastal Protection and Management Program, Maharashtra, India
Presented by Rajesh Srinivas, Ph.D., P.E.
February 14, 2013
Maharashtra State, India
Brief Background
• Maharashtra
Population: 112 M (2011)
Contribution to national GDP: 13.3% (2006 – 2007)
• State of Maharashtra has embarked on a nine-year program to develop and implement sustainable methods to manage its shoreline
• Funding: state financing + a loan from the Asian Development Bank
The Maharashtra Coast • 720 km shoreline
320 km affected by erosion
• Rocky and sandy stretches
• Heavily armored in developed areas
Revetments and seawalls
• Dominant coastline use – shipping, fisheries, cultural attractions
Jetties and breakwaters
The Coasts
Commercial Jetty and Fishing Harbor
Cultural Attraction and Coastal Road
Pier for Passenger Ferry
Navigational Entrance
Beach Vendors and Recreation
The Nine-Year Investment Program
PPTA
Tranche 1: $15.2 million
Tranche 2: $79.4 million
Tranche 3: $74 million
Project Phases: Maharashtra PPTA : completed
Tranche 1: 2010 – 2013 (in progress)
Tranche 2: 2013 – 2016 (indicative)
Tranche 3: 2016 – 2019 (indicative)
ADB loan : $120.2 M
Maharashtra Govt.: $35 M
Private sector: $13.4 M
=> Total: $168.6 M
Executing Agency: Maharashtra Maritime Board
Anticipated Impact
Increase income and reduce poverty of the coastal communities in the sub-project areas of Maharashtra
• Five years after program completion (2024)
Increase per capita income for coastal communities in the sub-project areas
Increase contribution from tourism to State GDP
Reduce poverty incidence in coastal communities
Sustainable Coastal Protection and Management Program
Sustainable Coastal Protection and Management Program
Expected Outcome
Protected and managed shorelines in the state meeting the needs of stakeholders and the environment
Expected Outputs
1. Developed a sustainable management structure and management plans for shorelines
2. Reduced coastal erosion and instability
3. Enhanced in-state capacity for shoreline planning and development
Example of Project Performance Monitoring Design Summary Performance
Targets/Indicators
Data Sources/Reporting
Mechanisms
Assumptions and Risks
Outputs
2. Coastal Erosion and
Instability Reduced
2.2 Community and
private sector engaged
in coastal erosion and
instability reduction
50 communities with
30% women
beneficiaries in each
district where
intervention is
supported
Private sector
investments in
coastal protection
and management up
to 7% of total cost
BME reports
Project progress
reports
ADB review
missions
Business license
application records
Assumptions
Local communities
and private sector
supportive of
coastal management
and protection
initiatives
Private sector sees
enough benefit to
participate
What is “Sustainable?” • Sustainability: the capacity to endure
• For us:
Consider engineering, environmental, economic, and social elements in developing responsible solutions for coastal management
Provide a means for the State to act as a steward of its valuable coastal resources
Broad Program Investment Strategy for Sub-Projects
All activities must involve the community and stakeholders
1. Provide coastal protection to address immediate coastal erosion needs – Implement economically viable protection works through the use environmentally and socially
appropriate solutions
2. Address the causes of coastal erosion or coastal instability – Improve coastal infrastructure currently causing or could cause damage to natural coastal
processes
– Key areas of intervention include navigation inlets and training of river and creek mouths
3. Promote natural protection measures – Develop and vegetate dunes, plant mangrove or other trees for protection or shelter
4. Invest in other coastal management initiatives like water quality improvement, dredging, reclamation, etc.
5. Apply investments to increase the economic value or amenity value of the coast and shoreline
Oversight Program Steering Committee • Members
Secretary, Maharashtra State Department of Home – Transport and Port (Chairperson of the PSC)
CEO, MMB (Secretary of the PSC) Secretary, Maharashtra State Department of Finance Secretary, Maharashtra State Department of Water Resources
Development Secretary, Maharashtra State Department of Fisheries Secretary, Maharashtra State Department of Environment Secretary, Maharashtra State Department of Urban Development Secretary, Maharashtra State Department of Rural Development Secretary, Maharashtra State Department of Tourism Representatives of Thane, Mumbai, Raigad, Ratnagiri, and Sindhudurg
District Governments Civilian representatives
• Semi-annual Meetings
Execution • State Executing Agency – Maharashtra Maritime Board
(MMB)
Project Management Unit (PMU)
Project Management and Design Consultant (PMDC)
Project Management and Design Consultants • Taylor Engineering in a joint venture with an Indian
company — Mukesh & Associates
Selected by the MMB and the ADB
Team of 30 international and national experts
Engineering, planning, construction, environmental sciences, economics, GIS, PPP, tourism, social sciences (community and gender issues)
Project extends Jan 2012 – May 2015
PMDC Goals 1. Establish a sustainable coastal management program
for the State
2. Establish long-term, strategic planning framework for the State
3. Strengthen institutional capacity
4. Implement Tranche 1 projects
5. Plan and design Tranche 2 projects
1. Establish State Program • Set up a Coastal Infrastructure Management Unit with
mandates for
Coastal protection and engineering (tactical)
Beach and ecosystem management (strategic)
Data acquisition, storage, and dissemination
Coastal Management Information System
Coastal environmental clearance support
2. Strategic Planning Framework – State Level • Identify the principles of the shoreline management
strategy
• Develop general engineering, environmental, social, and economic screening criteria requiring compliance for project funding consideration
• Incorporate by reference all completed feasibility studies or management plans
• Maintain a list of all proposed and constructed projects by district throughout the state
• Provide relative information regarding compliance with the CRZ Notification 2011
2. Strategic Planning Framework – State Level • Describe the requirements for obtaining government
clearances, as applicable
• Describe the CIMU’s long-term data collection and monitoring program
• Describe the CMIS
• Describe the state’s shore erosion emergency response plan, including permitting and funding policies
2. Strategic Plans – District Level • Segment the districts into Coastal Process Units
based on shoreline characterization
• Analyze coastal processes
• Characterize land use
• Identify appropriate Coastal Management Units [geographic in scope]
• Develop sustainable shoreline planning and management strategies
• Collect data to support the above analyses
3. Strengthen Institutional Capacity • State, district, and community level
MMB, Fisheries, Tourism, PWD, Environment, Kharland, DPC, Panchayat
1. Institutional review
2. Needs assessment: individual and composite
3. Requirements definition
4. Training plan development
5. Training plan implementation
Shoreline management organizations
• Private industry and academic/research institutes
3. Strengthen Institutional Capacity Outcomes
• Increased communication and data sharing between coastal stakeholder agencies
• Improved capability to deal with coastal management issues
• Strong foundation for prudent/responsible development of the coast
• Capacity to develop long-term strategic plans for responsible stewardship
4. Implement Tranche 1 Projects • Sand-filled geotextile reef/breakwater in north Mirya
Bay, Ratnagiri District
1.6-m (CD) water depth
255 m long, 150 m offshore, 1.7-m high 67 sand filled geotextile tubes
Construction ̴ Oct 2012 to Dec 2013+
• Sandy beach creation at north Mirya Bay
Source: about 400,000 m3 of sand dredged from Mirkarwada fishing harborharbor and sand heaps
– Construction ̴ Nov 2013 through May 2014
Mirya Bay Projects
Mirya Bay Soft Breakwater
5. Plan and Design Tranche 2 Projects Multi-phase planning process
• Long list
• Abbreviated long list
• Reconnaissance investigations
• Pre-feasibility investigations
• Feasibility investigations
Final Design Bid Documents
Example Work Products
Deepwater Winds and Waves
Extreme Deepwater Waves
Hydrodynamic Model
Hydrodynamic Model
Wave Model
After a Long But Productive Day …
Thank You