Upload
aldous-page
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Surigao State College of Technology Surigao City
EMMYLOU ASPACIO BORJA, Ed.D.
Assistant Professor II
Email address: [email protected]
VIRTUAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT (VLE) IN THE
TEACHING OF BIOLOGY
SURIGAO STATE COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
(SSCT)
Surigao City Campus
Del Carmen Campus
Malimono Campus
Mainit Campus
The twenty-first
century can be
characterized as the
age of technology
and media.
(Smaldino, 2005).
Introduction
Recently, teachers
have expanded their
repertoire of materials
and procedures to
include the new
technologies for
learning. (Smaldino,
2005).
In a typical
classroom, traditional
media such as pictures,
charts, diagrams,
television and
overhead projectors
are commonly used by
biology instructors.
(Reid, 2006).
Learning research has
demonstrated that
visualizing processes in
three dimensions aids
learning and animations
are effective visualization
tools for novice learners
and with a long term
memory retention.
(McClean, 2004).
set of teaching and
learning tools designed to
enhance students’ learning
experience by including
computers and the internet
in the learning process.
www.renbrook.org
www.softchalk.com
GENERAL OBJECTIVE
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of using virtual learning environment in the teaching of Biology.
determine the level of students' achievement in Biology in the pre-test and the post-test in the typical classroom and in the classroom using the VLE
find out the significant improvement from the pre-test to the post-test in the experimental and control groups in terms of their achievement in Biology as well as the significant difference in the students’ interest and attitude towards Biology.
Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
Bruner’s Constructivist Learning Theory
Virtual Learning Environment(VLE)
Mayer’s Theory of Multimedia
Pre – test
Biology Teaching
Experimental(VLE)
Interest
Control(Traditional Media)
Post - Test
Learning Guide for Biology Lessons Using VLE
Attitudes
Quasi-Experimental Design
The design involved two groups, the
control and experimental groups. Both
groups were pre-tested and post-tested
but only the experimental group was
given the experimental treatment.
Research Methodology
Research Design
The respondents of this study
were the 86 1st year BSED students
of SSCT Surigao City Campus for AY
2011-2012
Respondents
The researcher used the following
instruments:
Instrument I. Learning guide for the lessons using VLE and traditional media.
Instrument II. Researcher-made test to determine the achievement level of the students in biology.
Instrument III. Modified Fenemma-Sherman Biology Attitude Scale and modified interest scale
Research Instrument
The following steps were done in
conducting the study:
Selection
Group Matching
Pre-testing
Intervention
Post-testing
Data Gathering Procedure
The following statistical tools were employed to treat the data of the study:
z-test t-test of Correlated Means t-test of Mean Difference t-test of Independent Samples Spearman Brown Formula
Hypothetical significance was pegged at α=.05
Statistical Treatment of Data
The following were the findings of the study:
The experimental and control groups performance in the pre-test was “Below Average”.
Both groups performance increased in the post-test from “Below Average” to “Average”.
The experimental group had a higher mean gain than the control group but it was not statistically significant.
Both groups collaborative feeling toward Biology was positive which means that they were “Interested”.
Findings
The experimental and control groups had
the same interest towards Biology.
The experimental and control groups
collaborative trend of opinion towards
Biology was “Agree” which means that they
had “Positive” attitude towards Biology.
Both groups had positive attitude towards
Biology.
The use of Virtual Learning Environment
(VLE) is as effective as the use of Traditional
Media in teaching Biology. When a teacher
uses constructivist approach in teaching, the
use of VLE and traditional media are both
effective in enhancing academic performance
and promoting positive attitude and interest
of students towards the subject.
Conclusion
Documentation During the Conduct of the Study
CONTROL GROUP
EXPERIMENTAL GROUP
THANK YOU
ReferencesA. BOOKS
Brooks, J. (1990). Teachers and Students Constructivist
Forgiving
Connections – Educational Leadership. Alexandria,
VA.
Bruner, Jerome (2005). A Study of Thinking. Harvard
University Press. USA
Campbell, Neil A. (2007). Biology Concepts and Connections
Eight
edition. Pearson Education South Asia PTE. LTD.
Philippines.
Denby, Derek.( 2005). ICT in Support of Science Education:
A Practical
User's Guide. The University of York Science
Education Group.
Fischer, F. (2004). Computer Networking for Education. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Good, T. (1994). School Effects: Handbook of Research on Teaching. MacMillan, New York.
Krapp, A. (2000). Interest and Human Development During Adolescence: An
Educational- Psychological Approach. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.
Motivational Psychology of Human Development. London: Elsevier.
Lucido, Paz I. (2007). Educational Technology II. Lorimar Publishing, Inc. Quezon City, Metro Manila.
Mader, Sylvia S. (1998). BIOLOGY. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. U.S.A.
Mayer, R.E (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Navarro, Rosita. (1998). The Theoretical
Basis of Media Technology. Katha Publishing Co. Inc. Quezon City.
Penecilla, Gerard L. (2003). Basic Concepts in Biology. Trinitas Publishing, Inc. Pantoc, Meycauayan, Bulacan.
Piaget, J. (1996). Education Researches as cited in Educator Services, Teaching and Learning Curriculum Resources.
Reed, Arthea J.S., et.al.(1998). In the Classroom, An Introduction to Education. McGraw-Hill Co., Inc., New York.
Pitrich, P.R. and Schunk, D.H. (2002). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research and Application (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Salandanan, G.(2002). Teaching Approaches and Strategies. National Publishing House.
Scanlon E, et al (2003). Educational Technology & Society 3(4), Pearson Prentice Hall, U.S.A.
Smaldino, Sharon E. (2005). Instructional Technology and Media for Learning. Pearson Prentice Hall, U.S.A.
Someren, E. (2001). Learning with Multiple Representations. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Sprinthall, R. (1998). Educational Psychology A Developmental Approach. United States of America: Mc Graw- Hill Companies, Inc.
B. JOURNALS
Ali, R. (2005). Development and Effectiveness of Modular Teaching in Biology at Secondary Level. University ofArid, Rawalpindi Journal.
Ainsworth, S. (1998). Analyzing the Costs and
Benefits of Multiple Representational Learning Environments. Learning with Multiple Representations. Amsterdam, Pergamon.
Ang, H.K and Wang Q. (2006). Proceedings of the
First International LAMS Conference 2006: Designing the Future of Learning. Paper presented at Nanang Technological University, Singapore
Azzawi, Mary. (2007). The Effectiveness of Lecture-Integrated, Web- Supported Case Studies in Large Group Teaching. Bioscience Education e-Journal Volume 5.
Clark, Richard E. (1994). Media will Never Influence Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29.
Cherif, A., and M. Wideen. (1992). The Problems of Transition from High School to University Science. Catalyst. 36 (1)
Chou, S. W. and Liu, C. H.(2005). Learning Effectiveness in a Web Based
Virtual Learning Environment: a Learner Control Perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 65–76
Dalgarno, B. (2004). User Control and Task Authenticity for Spatial Learning in 3D Environments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20 (1), 1-17. Dede, C. (1998). Introduction. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) Yearbook: Learning with Technology. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Durbin J.M., (2002). The Benefits of Combining Computer Technology and Traditional Teaching Methods in Large Enrollment Geoscience Classes, Journal of Geoscience Education, 50, 56-63.
Ebenezer, J.V and Zoller, U. (1993). Grade 10 Students' Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward Science Teaching and School Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 30 pp. 175-186.
Etkina, E., and J.P. Mestre. (2004). Implications of Learning Research for Teaching Science to Non-Science Majors. SENCER Backgrounder PRESENTED AT at SSI 2004.
Fadel, Charles. (2008). Multimodal Learning Through Media: What the Research Says. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Fairbrother R. (2000). Strategies for Learning. In: Monk M and Osborne J (Eds), Good practice in Science Teaching: What research has to say (pp. 7–22). Buckingham. Open University Press.
Franklin, S. and Peat, M. (1998). Online Learning: The First Year Biology Way. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, December.
Gance, S. (2002). Are Constructivism and
Computer-Based Learning Environments Incompatible? Journal of the Association for History and Computing, 5 (1), K-12.
Goldberg, Harry R. (2000). Student Test Scores are Improved in a Virtual Learning Environment. Advance Physical Education. Vol. 23, pages 59-66.
Ho, W.C. (2009). The Role of Multimedia Technology in Hongkong Higher Education Music Programs. Visions of Research in Music Education.
Hounsel, P.B and Hill S.R. (1989). The Microcomputer & Achievement & Attitudes in High School Biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 26, pp 543-549.
Johnson, A. (2002). Augmenting Elementary School Education with VR. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. March/April, 6-9.
Kachala, J. (1996). Report on the
Effectiveness of Technology in Schools. Software Publishers Association, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
Kozma, Robert B. (1994), The Influence of Media on Learning: The Debate Continues, School Library Media Research, Volume 22, Number 4, Summer 1994.
Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of Computer-Based Instruction: An Updated Analysis, Computer in Human Behavior, 7, 75-94.
Liao, Y.K.C. (1999). Effects of Hypermedia on Students‘ Achievement. A Meta- Analysis. J. Ed. Multimedia Hypermedia Vol. 8, 255-277.
Luca, Joseph. 2008. Roles and Importance of Multimedia in Higher Education. Paper presented on EDMEDIA June 30, 2008. Vienna, Austria.
Max and Kishner, N. (2008). Assessing the Relationship Between Attitude Towards Mathematics and Achievements in Mathematics: A Meta Analysis. Journal for Research in Math Education, Vol. 28 No. 1, 1997.
Mayer, R. (1999). Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology 91: 358–368.
Mc Clean, P. & Johnson, C. (2004). Molecular & Cellular Biology Animations: Development and Impact on Student Learning.
Nasr, Ahmad R. (2011). International Journal of Biology, Volume 3, no.4
Ogena, B. and Brawner F. (1992). Science
Education in the Philippines: An Overview. National Education Congress (A Compilation),1:1-23.
Osborne, J. (2003). Attitude Towards
Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25,1049–1079.
Okan, Z. (2003). Edutainment: is Learning at Risk? British Journal of Educational Technology. Vol. 34, pp. 255-264.
Orlando, Demetri. (2004). The Potential of
Virtual Learning Environments. Emerging Issues for Educational Technology.
Peat, M. (2001). Managing Change: The Use
of Mixed Delivery Modes to Increase Learning Opportunities. Australian Journal of Education Technology. Vol. 17 (1), 37-49.
Plass J. L., Chun D. M., Mayer R. E., and Leutner D., (2003), Cognitive Load in Reading a Foreign Language Text with Multimedia Aids and the Influence of Verbal and Spatial Abilities. Computers in Human Behaviour 19, 221-243.
Reid, Alex T. (2000). Perspectives on Computers in Education: The Promise, The Pain, The Prospect. Active Learning. CTI Support Service. Oxford, U.K.
Roberts, Gary. (2010). Developing the Agora in the 21st Century- An Analysis of a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) as a Platform for Engaging with Adult Literacies Practitioners in Scotland. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, Vol. 2, Issue 2, 2010. pages 1096-1101.
Rynor, B. (2004). Virtual CHILD's Play: Letting Disabled Kids in on the Games.The Ottawa Citizen; The Citizen's Weekly (Style Section).
Seufert T. (2003) Supporting Coherence Formation in Learning from Multiple Representations. Learning and Instruction 13, 227-237.
Sikos, Laszlo. (2010). The Role of Structured
Multimedia to Improve the Teaching Impact in Process Integration. Information Technology Journal, Hungary.
Squire, K. (2004). Replaying History: Learning World History Through Playin Civilization III. Graduate Studies Journal, Indiana State University.
Shrigley, R.L. (1990). Attitude & Behavior are Correlates. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 27, 97-113.
Trumper, Ricardo (2006). Factors Affecting Junior High
School Student’s Interest in Biology. Science Education International Vol. 17, No. 1, March 2006, pp. 31-48
White, Alan R. (1999). The Virtual Cell: An Interactive, Virtual Environment For Cell Biology. Paper submitted to the World Conference on Educational Media, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA 99).
Wonacott, M. E.(2000). Web-Based Training and
Constructivism. Columbus: National Dissemination Center for Career and Technical Education, the Ohio State University
C. UNPUBLISHED THESIS AND DISSERTATION
Enrile, Christine R. (2012) “Learning Activity Packages (LAP) in Teaching Stoichiometry and Gas Laws”. Unpublished Masteral Thesis. Cebu Normal University, Cebu City.
Enriquez, Lynne R. (2006). “The Effects of
Computer Simulated Experiments CSE) VS Traditional Laboratory Experiments (TLE) on Students Performance in Physics”. Unpublished Masteral Thesis. Cebu Normal
University, Cebu City.
Geraldino, Linda. (2002). “Level of Pupil’s Achievement in Science and the Degree of Necessity of Teaching Needs and Adequacy of In-Service Training of RISE and Non-Rise Teachers”. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, San Nicolas College, Surigao City.
Lorenzana, Merlinda A. (2008). “Information Technology (IT) Integration in Secondary Chemistry”. Unpublished Masteral Thesis. Cebu Normal University, Cebu City.
Sanchez, Merlyn. (2004). “The Relative Effectiveness of
Constructivist Guided, Practical Work and Process Approaches in Teaching College Algebra”.Unpublished Dissertation: MPSC, Cagayan de Oro City.
Yepes, Prose Ivy G. (1999). “The Effects of Using Videotapes in Biological Science Instruction for College Students”. Unpublished Masteral Thesis. Cebu Normal University, Cebu City.
D. ELECTRONIC SOURCES
http://www.masteringbio.comhttp:vcell.ndsu.edu/animations/flytrough/
movieflash.htmhttp://bio-alive.com/animations/cell-
biology.htmhttp://www.cellsalive.com/mitosis.htmhttp://iknow.net/CDROMs/cell_cdrom/
index.htmlhttp:/www.youtube.comhttp://www.vcbio.science.ru.nl/en/
virtuallessons/mitostage/http://biologyhttp://www.cellsalive.com/meiosis.htmhttp://www.yutube.com/watch?
v=iXmw3fR8fh0
http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~terry/Common/respiration.html
http://www.wiley.com/legacy/college/boyer/0470003790/animations/tca/tca.htm
http://highered.mcgrawhill.com/sites/0072437316/student_view0/chapter9/animations
http://www.brookscole.com/chemistry_d/templates/student_resources/shared_resources/animations/oxidative/oxidativephosphorylation.html
http://nhscience.lonestar.edu/biol/bio1int.htm
http://biology.clc.uc.edu/courses/bio105/geneprob.ht