SUPREME ^OURT OF OHIO CLERK OF COURT 19E^ a statute uses the word shall it will be construed as mandatory. Mhen a statute is mandatory, non-compliance will render the proceedings to

yr.^ Yr ^ „w ^ 2

^^^^^^(̂,^-A^^-0

THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

STATE OF OHIO ex rel.,ROBERT A. SNEAD

Relator, Case No.

'v"s. A0

JUDGE RICHARD P. FERENC et al,,:

Respondent.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION

ROBEP,.T A. SNEAD #425-370Maci WA°146-L1851 STATE ROUTE 56P.O. BOX 740LONDON, OHIO 43140

RELATOR IN PRO SE

JUDGE RICHARD P. FERENC270 MAIN STREETBATAVIA, OHIO 45103

VINCENT & D. FARIS (0001153)CLERMONT COUNTY PROSECUTOR76 S. RIVERSIDE DR. 3RD FLR.BATAVIA, OHIO 45103

(513)-732-7313

":, 3 u:s ^ ^^ ^^'

rS,:csi 3v'î^,^4 r

/^,,..N, .^,^^.i's'

;'rs'/'y;%."`"^f;fi^"S'S4's% ins" iî'+

s u {3P, f^.,WE G 0 u 3 3 L r/, ^ry'^^d.'' i £ y 0

19E^ ^^ ^^^^

CLERK OF COURTSUPREME ÔURT OF OHIO

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY:

1.) On February 25th, 2002, the Relator entered guilty pleas in this case

(Case No. 2001-CR-0010, Clermont County Court of Common Pleas) to 2 counts

of Kidnapping (one with sexual motivation), 1 count of Aggraâted Burglary,

1 count of Felonious assault of a peace officer and 2 misdemeanor assaults.

All counts stemmed from a single continuous incident on the night of January

1st, 2001. The Relator was sentenced to Maximum and Consecutive terms for an

aggregate sentence of 21 years and was erroneously adjudicated as a sexual

predator. The Relator has attempted numerous times to have the illegal

sentence corrected, however none have been successful. On May 15th, 2013, the

Relator filed a motion to correct a void sentence stating that his sentence

is void do to A.) Non-compliance with tnandatory Statutes, thus rendering the

entire p-roceedi.ngs void and illegal (see numerous citati.ons contained herein),

B.) The Court's failure to comply with Crim. R. 11(C)(2)(a) accepting a plea

of guilty while there was a contemporaneous objection as to his actual

innocence to the felonious assault of a peace officer and, C.) That the sente-

nce is unlawful, illegal, unauthorized by law and in direct conflict with

established law, rendering it a nullity and void in its entirety.

II. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION:

2.) This is an action for writ of mandamus and prohibition to, A.) compel

Judge Richard P. Ferenc, or any presiding Judge of the Clermont County Court

of Common Pleas, to immediately issue a lawful sentence in the Relator's case,

as the Law required the day he was sentenced, B.) to prohibit the same from

acting outside of the parameters set forth in the included memorandum in

support. C.) To prohibit the Clermont County Prosecutor from acting in any

manner inconsistent with the established law as cited in the memorandum in

support.

-1-

3.) The Respondents have a specially joined duty upon them to act within the

Ohio Constitution and by the Ohio Revised Code §S 2931.03, 2929.11, 2929.12,

2929.13, 2929.14, 2929.19, 2929.41, 2941.25 ar-d; Wt not ]irdte3 to 2950.09.

4.) The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked on the basis of Article IV,

Section 3 of the Ohio Constitution, Additionally, this Court has held that a

sentence that is void may be attacked and thus corrected at any time; State ex

rel. Cruzado v. Zaleski, 111 Ohio St.3d 353, 856 N.E.2d 263 (2006)• State v.

Fischer_, 128 Ohio St.3d 92, 942 N.E.2d 332 (2010).

5.) The Relator has been deprived of adequate remedy at law.

6.) The facts demonstrating that the Relator is entitled to the relief requested

are, in brief, as follows (they are fully articulated in the included memorandum

in support):

A. )'I`he trial court failed to perforni its duty and accepted a gtiu.lty`plea, is.xler

contemporaneous objections of actual innocence.

B.) The trial court failed to comply with controlling precedents at the

time of sentencing. Precedents that govern the imposition of near maxinlum,

maximum and consecutive sentences.

C.) The trial court failed to comply with mandatory staiutes governing the

imposition of near maximum, maximum, consecutive and concurrent sentences, and

the imposition of a sexual predator adjudication. Including Ohio Revised Code

H 2929.11, 2929.12, 2929.13, 2929.14, '2929.19, 2929.41, 2941.25 and, but not

limited to § 2950.09. All of these sections of code use the word shall. When

a statute uses the word shall it will be construed as mandatory. Mhen a statute

is mandatory, non-compliance will render the proceedings to which it relates

illegal and void State ex rel. Jones v. Farrar, 246 Ohio St, 467, 471-72

^1946); In Re Dav-is, 84 Ohio St.3d 520, 522; Fraternal Order of Police V. Cit

of Cleveland, 749 N.E.2d 840 (2001).

-2-

D.) The Judge in this case, at the request of the Prosecutor, disregarded the

Iaw. As no Judge has the authority to disregard the law, a sentence that clearlv

does so is void, Colegrove V. Burns, 175 Ohio St. 437, 438 (1964). If an act is

unlawful it is not erroneous or voidable, but is wholly unauthorized and void,

State ex rel. Kudrick v. Meredith, 24 Ohio N.P. (N.S.) 120, 124 (1922).

E.) Uhen all of the Relator's sentencing and plea arguments, and the

controlling statutes, precedents and guidelines are lawfully and properly applied

the Relator's sentencing is not within the applicable statutory range. Thus it

does not contain the actual applicable statutorily mandated term and is void,

State v. Beasley, 14 Ohio St. 74 (1984).

F.) The ignored statutory mandates were lawfully put into place by the Ohio

Legislature to constrain the power of the judiciary. Specifically, to prevent

a sentence such as the one in the case at bar, Oregon v. Ice, 129 S.Ct. 711

(2009).

WF31,,REPORE: The Relator prays that:

A.) A pererriptory writ of mandamus issue immediately requiring the Respondents

perform the duty upon the, or;

B.) An alternative writ of mandamus issue iiumediately requiring that the

Respondents show cause why they should not be ordered and compelled and

C.) A writ of prohibition issue for both Respondents with the writ of

mandamus prohibiting the Respondents from:

1.) Issuance of a new sentence that is not compliant with the

controlling precedents, statutes and guidel.ines as they were at the

time of the Relator's sentencing and as they articulated in both the

motion to correct a void sentence, the sentencing memorandum, this

petition and its accompanying memorandtun.

2.) Any retaliations or vindictive actions in conjunction with the

Relator's subsequent proceedings. and;

-3-

D.) Any and all forms of relief deemed appropriate by this Court and;

E.) F'or all costs to be paid by the Respondents.

Respectfully Submitted,;

.^,

AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION Relator In Pro Se

I, Robert A. Snead, do hereby verify that I have read the foregoingpetition and that the matters stated therein are true and correct to the bestof my knowledge and belief. ROBERT A. SNEAD

PSworn to and subscribed in my presence on this Va- day of November, 2013.

q^ a e êop7^ UBt, I l^

fêicar^fe K. EOS}ôodNotary Pub16c-atat® of C3hio

mi ExpirOs

_4_

ROBEl2T A. SNEAD


STATE OF OHIO ex re7L oROBERT A. SNEAD

Relator,

vs.

Case rio.

JUDGE RICHARD P. FERENC et al.,

Respondents.

RELATOR' S AFFIDAVIT INSUPPORT

I, 11a'be:^t A. Snead, d1o ^êr°,-I-,y solemnly swear that the following sta.tefitpr7usare true ac.d: accurate 'ô the 'be-st of my knovier^ge and belief_=a

1.) These statements are made frQc':1 illj7 ©LTCI -PersC3nal l;iZlt3lJledgC'a

2.) 1 ain t?he îa:l.ator in the <ibove-êntitleci act:i(yri and I am fully c(xnpet-e:ntto malre these s tace!rre-nts a

3.) The Respondents liave in the past failed to follow mandatory ;tatu.tes,controlling precedents aiid. other vail(i Sup.rame Court of O;.:zi..o Drecedeir4s.

4.) The Respondents have iri ^--ie past fa:i.iecl conply wit:ri t1he C;-rîrtqznal Rulesof Procecl ure .

^ o) `'!1@ Respondents have demonstrated api"op''ils7:,ty for cC32ltiilued vio7 aionS

of 'L:tie Crinimal ?Lr7_es of Procedure, Valid 01.ixo si:rprezpe Court precedents andlllandatot-y Statutes.

a,):T have no other course of lega.3^_ renmedy,

7.) All matters stated in the accompanying petition are sworn to as thouglifully stated 'nerein.

Further Affiant saye t'n naugInta

R.(3BFR.T A . SNEAD

Su7orrt to and subscribed in my prese-nce this akg, day of Novei^bec, 2013.

-P-oêw^ ^: •^ â

0 0°,¢ ^ a

9A/1 6aS


STATE OF OHIO ex rel.ROBERT A. SNEAD,

Relator,

vs.Case No.


Respondents.

REI.ATOR ° S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT

ROBERT A. SNEAD #425-370MaCI WA-146-L1851 STATE ROUTE 56P . G . BOX 740LGNDON, OHIO 43140

RELATOR IN PRO SE

JUDGE RICHARD P. FERENC270 MAIN STREETBATAVIA, OH 45103

^

VINCENT D. FARIS (0001153)CLERMONT COUNTY PROSECUTOR76 S.RT1t'ERSIDE DRIVE 3RD FLR.BATAVIA OH 45103(S1S)-7312-7313

RELATOR'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT

I. THE CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO FOLLOW THE LAW:

There can be no allowance for indifference, disobedience, disregard or

otherwise failure to follow mandatory statutes, standing Supreme Court of Ohio

precedents, C-riminal Rules of Procedure, or any inattention to the Law.

When a Statute uses the word "shall" it will be construed as mandatory.

Fh7hen a statute is mandatory, non-compliance will render the proceedings to

GJfiich it relates illegal and void, e.g. see, State ex rel. Jones v. Farrar,

146Oh.io St. 467, 471-72 (1946); In Re Davis, 84 Ohio St.3d 520, 522 (1999);

Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Cleveland, 749 N.E.2d 840 (2001). Such is

the case at hand. The following arguments demonstrate no less than eight (8)

mandatory statutes the Respondents failed to follow, one key Criminal Rule

that was blatantly ignored and a multitude of Supreme Court standing precedents

that were casually discarded in the imposition of near-maximum, maximum, and

consecutive sentences with the sexual predator adjudication.

An act which is contrary to law is therefore unlawful, illegal, unauthorized

by law and in direct conflict with established law. Because no Judge has the

authority to disregard the law, a sentence that clearly does so is void; see,

Colegrove v. Burns, 175 Ohio St. 437, 438 (1964).

Th.e Ohio Legislature "intentionally" put the constraints in these eight

statutes to control the length of sentence the Judiciary may impose, and it

is their rightful place to do so, see e.g. Oregon v. Ice, 129 S.Ct 711 (2009).

When these eight statutes, precedents and criminal rules are enforced, the

Relator's sentence may only be within a range of six (6) to eleven (11) years

not the twenty-one (21) imposed. Additionally, the sexual predator adjudication

could not be more than the.sexually oriented offender adjudication. The

Respondents were aware of these factors yet demonstrated a blatant disregard

-1-

for the laws governing felony sentencing.

There can be but one resolution to the case at bar. This illegal sentence,

judgment and conviction must be deemed void, and the Respondents must start

anew with the disposition of the Relator's case, and be prohibited from any

further disregard for the law. Since the Relator's sentence does not contain

the specific actual applicable statutorily mandated sentence it is void, see,

State v, Beasley 14 Ohio St..74 (1984).

II. THE INDIVIDUAL INFRACTIONS OF LAW:

A.) O.R.C. § 2929.11, states in relevant part "A sentence imposed for a

felony shall be --^^^ consistent with sentences imposed for similar crimes

coirgnitted by similar offenders." The record, see attached sentencing entry,

reflects that this was not performed.

B.) O.R.C. § 2929.12, states in relevant part : at 2929.12(B):

The sentencing court shall consider all of the following that apply regardingthe offender, the offense, or the victim, and any other relevant factors, asindicating that the offender's conduct is more serious than conduct normallyconstituting the offense".O.R.C. § 2929.12(B)(2), further states: "The victim suffered serious physical,psychological, or economic harm as a result of the offense".

At the time of the Relator's sentencing State v. Edmondson, 86 Ohio St.3d 324

(1999), was the controlling precedent for the imposition of near maximum and

maxzmum sentences. It mandated that these terms be reserved for the "worst of

the worst" offenders, and "based on recent changes in Ohio sentencing law

minimum sentences are favored for first time offenders". While the trial court

made a finding of "great or unusual harm" there is no evidence within the

record to substantiate the finding as is requl.red.by Q.R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(e).

C.) O.R.C. § 2929.14(B), states in releavant part, "the court shall imposethe shortest prison term authorized" and again at O.R.C. § 2929.14(C)"the court may impose the longest prison term only upon offenders whocommitted the worst forln of the offense". And again at O.R.C. § 2929.12(E)(4),"The court may require the offender to serve the prison terms conseaitivelyif the court finds and if the court also finds any of the following:

-2-

O.R.C. § 2929.14(E)(4)(b): further states in relevant part "the harm caused bytwo or more of the multiple offenses was so great or unusual that no singleprison term adequately reflects the seriousness of the offender's conduct".

l,lhile the trial court made this finding, it failed to support it with reasons,

facts or evidence as was required by O.R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c) and State v.

Jones, 93 Ohio St.3d 391 (2001).

While this court did make a possibly intervening decsion in State v.

Porterfield, 106 Ohio St.3d 5, 2005-Ohio=3095, there are still two points

that bear consideration: 1.) In Porterfield supra, the court was relieved of

the onus of fitxiirgs only because Porterfield made them and the court reiterated

them on the record and, 2.) The statute is mandatory and thus the only Judicial

by-pass to it would be unconstitutionality of the statute and this was upheld

by the principals in Oregon v. Ice supra, as the Legislations right.to put

constraints upon the judiciary. The fact remains that the Relator made no

such. stipulations as in Porterfield supra.

D.)-O.R.C. § 2929.19, states in relevant part: at § 2929.19(A)(1) "the courtshall inform the offender -'-'-°^ of the finding of the court", and again at§ 2929.19(B)(2) "The court shall impose a sentence and shall make a findingthat gives its reasons for selecting the sentence> imposed in any af.thefollowing circumstances".

(c) "If it imposes consecutive sentences under § 2929.14 of the revised code,its reasons for imposing the consecutive sentences".

(e) :--its reasons for imposing the maximum prison term".

These reasons were never permitted to be merely uttered, they also must have

been supported by facts and evidence. No such reasons were ever brought forth

as none exist, as such the statute was mandatory and violated.

E.) O.R.C. § 2929.41(A), states in relevant part "Except as provided in%-' section 2929.14 a prison term shall be served concurrently with anyother prison term".

This section of the statute was very clear, if you cannot comply with section

2929..14, which the court did not and could not, the sentences must be run

concurrently, not consecutively.

-3-

F.) O.R.C. § 2941.25 (allied offenses), states in relevant part at 2941.25(A),

Y'Mhere the same conduct by the Defendant can be construed to constitute two ormore allied offenses of similar import, the indictment or information may containcounts for all such offenses, but the defendant may be convicted of only one".

While this section of the revised code certainly does not contain the word shall,

this court has ruled that the court has a"znandatory duty" to merge th.e counts,

see State v. Underwood, 2010-Ohio-1. Both statutes that use the word shall and

thisc3ecisi.on are mandatory. Failure to comply with the statute renders the

decision and proceedings illegal and void. The same must hold for any mandatory

duty.

G.) O.R.C. § 2929.19(B)(3)(e), was again mandatory in the notification of

post release control, with a defina.te mandatory term of five (5) years, the

consequences of violation of post release control, and the notification was

required to be in person, see State v. Jordan, 104 Ohio St.3d 21 (2004).

H.) O.R.C. § 2050.09, states in relevant part at § 2950.09(]3)(4) thecourt shall specif_y that the determination was made pursuant to division (B)of this section". And again at § 2950.09(E)(1) the Judge who is to imposesentence on the offender shall determi.ne, prior to sentencing, whether theoffender previously has been convicted of a,-' sexually oriented offense andis a habitual sex offender". And again at § 2950.09(E)(2) the Judge shallspecify in the offender's sentence that the offender is not a habitual sexoffender".

The Judge was under a mandatory duty to A.) state that the determination was

made pursuant to division (B) of this section, and to B.) make the habitual

sex offender determination. Neither were complied with.

I.) Criminal Rule 11(C)(2)(a) statesin relevant part, "(2) '-,-' shall not accepta plea of guilty without first addressing the defendant personally anddoing all of the following" at (a) "Determining that the defendant is makingthe plea voluntarily, with understanding of the maximum penalty involved".

The court failed to comply with this mandatory rule in two ways, A.) It

accepted the plea with a contemporaneous objection as to actual innocence of

the felonious assault of a peace officer and, B.) The court failed to state

the "actual applicable mandatory statutory sentence" when all, of the mandatory

-4-

statutory c:onstra-hits are given their due weight and precedence.

I I I. CONCLtTS ION :

There can be but one conclusion, the Relator`s sentence, judgment and

conviction must be deemed void, and the proceedings declared illegal as they

did not comport with mandatory statutes, criminal rules and precedents of the

Supreme Court of Ohio, State ex re1.. Jones, In Re Davis, & Fraternal Order of

Police supra.

This Court has held that a void sentence is subject to and may be corrected

at any time by the trial court see, State v. Fischer, 128 Ohio St.3d.92, 942

N.E.2d 332 (2010); State ex r_el. Cruzado v. Zaleski, 111 Ohio St.3d 353, 856

N.E.2d 263 (2006).

The Relator has a "vested right" to the lawful sentence as it was prescribed

by law the day he was sentenced see, Peerless Elec. v. Bowers, 164 Ohio St.

209, 210 (1955). The Relator requests this court grant all relief as sought in

the petition for manadmus and prohibition.

Respectfully Submitted,

_5_

ROBERT A. SNEAD

Relator In Pro Se

l!_ _^ D

COURT OF COMMON PLEASCLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO

20 13 APR 18 AM 10: 15STATE OF 9FilO CASE NO. 2D^1-CR-00'I ^

F-i)l^flfii-^. ri YfIi `t^3 êi3^;.:I^^f'LEi,K Or Ct;MMON I'LCA3 C:Os.ifsT

t,^ [.R,M0HPI4iftj'1?fp1H Judge Richard P. Ferenc

1ls.

ROBERT A. SNEAD, NUNC PRO TUNCJUDGMENT ENTRY

Defendant. . OF SENTENCE

On the 4t" day of March, 2002 defendant's sentencing hearing was held

pursuant to R.C. 2929.19. Defense attorney R. Scott Croswell and Assistant

Prosecuting Attorney Daniel J. Breyer and Maura Teague were present as was

defendant who was afforded all rights pursuant to Crim.R. 32. The Court has

considered the record, oral statements, any victim impact statement and

presentence report prepared, as well as the principles and purposes of

sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 and has balanced the seriousness and recidivism

factors under R.C. 2929.12.

The Court finds that defendant, pursuant to his pleas of guilty entered on

February 25, .2002, was thereby found guilty by the Court and thus convicted of:

Ct.#1: Aggravated Bur lg ary with a three year gun specification, in violation of

Section 2911.11(A)(1) of the OhioRevised Code, a felony of the first degree;

Ct:#4: Kidnapping with sexual motivation specification in violation of Section

2905.01(A)(2), a fefony of the first degree; Ct.#5: Kidnapping in violation of

Section 2945.01(A)(2), a felony of the first degree- Cts.#19 and #11: Assault in

violation of Section 2903.13, misdemeanors of the first degree and Ct #12:

Felonious Assault on a Police Officer in violation of Section 2903.11(A)(2), a

felony of the first degree.

Pursuant to Crim.R. 48(A), the State requested leave of court to dismiss

Ct.#2 - Aggravated Burglary, Ct.#3 - Aggravated Robbery, and Cts.#6, 7, 8 & 9

- Kidnapping - of the indictment. These charges are hereby dismissed and the

prosecution on these charges shall terminate accordingly.

-5-

THE COURT HEREBY FINDS that the Defendant is a sexual predator

subject to the reporting requirements of Section 2950 et sea. of the Ohio Revised

Code.

THE DEFENDANT IS HEREBY NOTIFIED that failure to register with the

appropriate local entity as a sexual predator is a separate criminal offense.

The Court finds pursuant to R.C. 2929.14(B) that the shortest prison term

possible will demean the seriousness of the offense AND will not adequately

protect the public and therefore imposes a greater term.

The Court finds that defendant has committed the worst form of the

offense AND THEREFORE imposes the maximum sentence for these offenses.

It is hereby ORDERED that defendant serve a term of ten (10) years as to

Ct.#1, plus three (3) years on the gun specification, ten (10) years as to Ct.#12,

to be served concurrent to Ct:#1, eight (8) years as to Ct.#4, and eight (8) vears-

as to Ct.#5, to be served concurrent to Ct.#4 but consecutive to Cts:#1 & 12, and

Cts.#1 Q& 11; six (6) months on each count, to be served concurrent, for a total

stated prison term of twenty one (21) years,

The sentences are ordered to be served consecutively to one another

being necessary to fulfili the purposes of R.C. 2929.11, and not disproportionate

to the seriousness of the offender's conduct or the danger the offender poses

and the Court FURTHER FINDS the harm caused was great or unusual.

Defendant has been given notice under R.C. 2929.19(B)(3) and of

appellate rights under R.C. 2953.08,

The Court has further notified the Defendant that post release control is

mandatory in this case up to a maximum of five years, as well as the

consequences for violating conditions of post release control imposed by the

Parole Board under Revised Code section 2967.28. The Defendant is ordered to

serve as part of this sentence any term of post release control imposed by the

Parole Board, and any prison term for violation of that post release control.

Defendant is ORDERED conveyed to the custody of the Ohio Department

of Rehabilitation and Corrections. Credit for jail time served is submitted under

-6-

separate entry. Defendant is ordered to pay court costs and any fees permitted

pursuant to R.C. 2929.18(A)(4).

Bond, if any shall be released.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that this Nunc Pro Tune Entry is being filed

pursuant to the holding in, State v. Lester, 130 Ohio Sf.3d 303, 2011-Ohio-5204,

958 N.E.2d 142, and this Court's personal review of the records in this case,

including, but not limited to the Defendant's written plea of guilty journalized on

February 25, 2002.

^ ,.

Richard P. Ferenc, Judge

TO THE CLERK:

Piease serve a copy of this Entry upon Judith Brant, Assistant Prosecuting

Attorney, 76 South Riverside Drive, Second Floor, Batavia, OH 45103, R. Scott

Croswell, 1208 Sycamore Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202, and Robert A. Snead,

#425-370, MaC( WA-146-L, P. O. Box 740, London, OH 43140, all by regular

U.S. Mail.

Richard P. Ferenc, Judge

-7-


vs.


Relator,. Case No.


Respondents.

RELATOR`S AFFIDAVIT OFPREVIOUS CIVIL FILINGS

I, Robert A. Snead, do hereby solemnly swear that the following statementis true and accurate to the best of iklyr 'inowlcdge an(7 belief:

1.) Ihav^ fi1ed: the following civil actions within the last 5yca.rsr

2s) (hi or abovi;. February 17th, 2011, I. filed a Federal Ha:teas Corpus p°t.:i.ti.orlagainst the t:7arden of MaCI. Case Na4 1:11-ovµ127, and its subsequenc appeal,Case No o^^^41? 7. Both were deniedd due to lack of Jbrisdi; tion,

3.) On or about August 18th, 2011, :f: filed suit aâinsfiw the ODRC in the courtof claims for 7.r gc:ries Zreceivedp Case ?tio. 2011-"10410, and its su'uscqu4nwAppeal, Case iiov 13API-02,,,157. [<lhi1.e we proved 1.iabilaty, bcth courts felcwe had not sufficiently proved acon^pensable level of injury.

4.) On or about September 28th, 2012, 1: filed a Federal 42 tI, S4 i>§ 1983action agai.nst Gary c< Mo?Zr, Stuart Hudson, John DesMarais, Gary Croft, Robert,,olch, Mona Parks, Dr. Andrew Eddy, DC. TC7s'..r','.e3, iltlrti,es Layne czf'C,. Root, RallphVilson, Karen fi i ariforwh, Jai,drea Parrish, Officer D. Mc ronis;al and MarcS'canleyr for denial of med%.wal care and first Amwndrraent viola'eicns of :r_ecalia-t:'Lo21s for use of the gr1eva12;:('_ p"°.L3ti.G7s. P#snntly we are in active di`^^cCJv°ry.Case No. 2 : 12 -cv-739v

5.) On or about MaFf 25th, 2012, SfiJ.ed: a medical Malpractice cc>:mp' aint a.11Drr DaV! d Chc'̂ Y lG^s We7 l i'"1y k ^^ e ^''d a'"i (^^. ^ ^ 3 :.nty C'L'^ L ^CrR^1 LCsiîâlC a,^ , ^^z'sa^G ,̂. ^''-dfJ ^^^tl!°,/^..J.^.t7.."t.^f.5`s ; `ô3.._..;.^34.i.,l.i.^J .E,K;,<.1.^ws:.:!,. '.,:;Z. ..3.1^3 ('^ ..,^^.!"', i_`, l.. .. t... :wli r^, ^_J1..^

.^....d:^, as, ^' .._ ^ ., .i.E %^

:e County court 3a'"':w"d ju ii<,?7 t1oi The ^. .̀.^C7u: e of Claims ta:?`"aE'. No.is 201 3000?,2 tMeis wa,., dismissed without pre j? dik,e due to my inability toGctTii3lyT with C1SP oR,.E0(D)(2),

_0

DEC 0 4 2013CIERK OF COURT

SUPREMECOURTOFONIO

6.) On or about April 10€.h, 2013, 1 filed ior writs of McaX)dazl?us and prohibitionin the Tuelfth Distrint Court of Appeals against Judge Richard P. FererAc 7.k;an attempt to r_ ecea.ve a proper fznal appeal.ai:ale order, Case t°ô. C^ 201J-Q4-t^31. gthe subserênc appeal if before ehis court; case rEoa 2013-1084e Jud.ê Ferencelztered a nunc; pro turic entry correcting the deficiencies ,anci the 12th diw-m1 ssed the petition as thus being moot.

7.) During July of 2013, 1 filed a complaint with the Court of Claims ofCh3.o, Case tlo. 2013-AD-0250 against the CDRC for being given amedirationthat I was known to ne allergic to. This is still being investigated.

80 4:1aVe filed no other civil actions within tb

Further Affiant sayeth naught.

Sworn to and sut^sur +be^: in my presence this .. ^ day of November , 2013.

,,I,

NQBLTGtAOCNe K. Eastrwood

PuhiBOM cf oh#o

.2

R®BERT A. SNEAD



Relator,

vs.


Case No.

Relator's Affidavit ofPersonal Property

Respondents.

I, Rtiberi A. Snead, do hereby solemnly si,rear that ti1e fol1:^.uvaing stat^ênt4-s true and accurate to the best of my 'Kcao-wled.ge and belief:

1.) Ici.irrer?t-ly have less 4han $25.00 -in my Inmate Trust Account.

2.) T currently possess the .ioll.w:lng itexrzso- A,.) A13'$ zenith 'T"V' B.) anArv'c? MP3 Player, C.) A GE sUDe:r 3 radio, D:j a JP4 player, F.) aMasseyfan, and. F.) A S:ainte:,. 'Eyê-vrrwter.

3.) 1 ha`re no oclicr assets 9accounts or possessions.

Further Affiant sayeth naugnt.

ROBERT A. SNEAD

Sworn to and sdoscrib^c1 in my presence fi?^^ s /) /) day oi 'Navenber520:1_3 m

e

BLICMelanie K. Etasiwood

z^ ^ F Notary Pablie-State of Ohio^ m y ôs^ ssioll x 6r^&

♦ d ,q

y^ ^^pg ti~ smunsav.^ r^ ^ ^ ^,Y


STATE OF OHIO, ex rel.ROBERT A. SNEAD,

Relator,

vs.

JUDGE RICHARD F. FERENC et a.I. , :

Case No.

Respondent.

R.ELAIUR' S AFFIDAVIT OFINDIGFN9CY

I, s:obert A. Snead, do beraby solemnly swear the following st;atoinents aretrue and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1.) Iam indigent, and as such Tart unable to pay the filing fees and costsassociated with the above-entitled case, I am indigent for Cie foliowir,,,reasons:

2.) 1 am currently incarcerated and as such I am without the financial meanswith which to pay nhe filing fees and costs associated with the abovc-entitledcase.

3.) I receive $18.00 per month from my Institutional assignment, and T^?ay$4.50 of this to child support.

4.) Thave less than the filing fee in my trust account at the :Cnstit^tion

F[7TiW; 1^FFTM,7 SAY.P'T?-I NAt) x'fffi :

ROBERT A. SNEAD

Sworn to and subscribed in my presence this ^ day of November, 2013.

/`^,^^^^^^V*_. PUSLIC

^

CLERK OF COURTSUPRCMF, CQ'^^ ^^ 0..^...,,.^.,r..^. ^_ ^l^^

h1e9onie K. EpstwoodNctary Rubl6c-S8ate of Ohio

MY 0 mi's ion Expirer,

-- ^^

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHA.BILITATIONAND COR-RECTION

SECTION I - TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER PRIOR TO THIS FORM BEING PRESENTEDTO TI-IE INMATE FOR COMPLETION OF SECTION TI - AFFZDAVIT OF INDIGENCY.

CASHIER AT THE MADISON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONCERTIFY TIMT THE FOLLOWING IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE REFLECTION OF THE STATUS OF THEACCOUNT MAINTAINED AT THIS INSTITUTION FOR THE BENEFIT OF:

Robert Snead r425-370

INMATE NAME AND NUMBER

ACCOUNT BALANCE AS OF t°"1 3 ^

TOTAL STATE PAY CREDITED FOR THE PRECEEDING SIX MONTHS:

AVERAGE MONTHLY STATE PAY FOR THE PRECEEDING SIX MONTHS

TOTAL FUNDS RECEIVED FROM ALL SOURCES, EXCLUDING STATE PAY,FOR THE PRECEEDING SIX MONTHS:

TURE OF CASHIER

NOV22 2013 ,̂bAFFIDAVIT OFINDIGENCY

MaCl CASMIER'S OFFICE

^ 103.00IS3^^

^ -7 o^^ 0

DA:TE

SECTION II - TO BE COMPLETED BY INMATE AFTER CASI-HER'S STATEMENT IS COMPLETED.

BEING FIRST DULY SWORN, SAYS THAT HE/SHE DOES NOT HAVESUFFICIENT FUNDS TO PAY THE FILING FEES AND OTHER COSTS OF PROSECUTING THIS ACTION JNTHE; COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR COUNTY, OHIO AND SUBMITS THECASHIERS STATEMENT (SECTION I) IN SUPPORT OF SAID ALLEGATION OF INDEGENCY.

I HEREBY REPRESENT THAT TIIE INFORMATION SET FORTH IN THE CASHIER'S STATEMENTCONCERNING MY FI?VA_NCIAL CONDITION IS TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNONVLEDGEAlsTl1 riTf' ie-•r+

/

f ^ ^'2 ^ ^^ 2, c;'INMATENAME AND NUMBER-

TO ME IN MY PRESENCE THIS C^6 DAY OF ^ 20¢_^

tuleianie K. EastwoodtVatary PubQic-S@aIe of

lon E

NOTARY PUBLIC

11/22/2013 Madison Correctionallnstitution

Inmate Demand Statement

Inmate Name: SNEAD, ROBERT A Number: A425370

Lock Location: MaCI, W,A,;,146L

Date Range: 04/01/2013 Through 11/23/2013

Beginning Account Balances: Ending Account Balances:

Saving Debt Payable Saving Debt PayableFederal Filing FE $0.00 ($177.54) $0.00 Federal Filing Fee R $0.00 $0.00 $0.00Inmate's Person $6.93 $0.00 $0.00 Inmate's Personal Ai $24.36 $0.00 $0<00Begin Totals $6.93 ($177.54) $0.00 End Totals $24.36 $0.00 $0.00

Transaction Transaction Saving Debt PayabieDate / Inst. Amount Description Comment Balance Balance Balance04/01/2013 $5.00 Reservation to SFF- Odrc Pos Exemption $6.93 ($177.54) $0.00

FFF HoldMaCI

04/01/2013 $0.00 $10.00 Reservation to Pos Odrc Pos ExemptionExemption

MaCI

04/05/2013 $18.00 State Pay State Pay

MaCI

04/05/2013 ($3.60) SFF-FFF Hold #1 - Automated FFF-RBTransfer

MaCI

04/05/2013 $3.60 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RBBalance Transfer

MaCI

04/05/2013 ($2.52) Postage Charges (USPS)

MaCI

04/08/2013 ($3.60) Payment to PRISONER April Payment 2013ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

MaCI

04/08/2013 ($4.50) Payment to CHILD Anril Payment 2013

MaCI

04/09/2013

MaCI

04/17/2013

MaCI

04/17/2013

MaCI

SUPPORT PAYMENTCENTRAL

($13.54) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 221424

$198.50 JPay MoneyOrders

($39.70) SFF-FFF Hold

Page: 1/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERTA

$6>93 ($177.54) $0.00

$24.93 ($177.54) $0.00

$21.33 ($177.54) $0.00

$21.33 ($173.94) $3.60

$18.81 ($173.94)

$18.81 ($173.94)

$14.31 ($173.94)

$3.60

$0.00

$0.00

$0.77 ($173.94) $0.00

25105542/SNEAD, LUCY $199.27 ($173.94) $0.00

#1 - Automated FFF-RB $159.57 ($173.94) $0.00Transfer

RECEIVED

NOV 2 2 2013 Q3)MaCi 11/22/2013

maCi CASH4ER`S OFF6CE

04/1712013

MaCi

04f23/2013

MaCI

04/24/2013

MaCI

04/24/2013

MaCi

04/24/2013

MaCI

04/26/2013

MaCI

04/29/2013

MaCI

04/29/2013

MaCI

04/30/2013

MaCI

05/01/2013

MaCi

05/01/2013

MaCI

05/01/2013

MaCI

05/03/2013

MaCi

05/03/2013

MaCI

05/03/2013

MaCI

05/06/2013

MaCI

05/06/2013

MaCI

05l06/2013

$39.70 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RBBalance Transfer


($1.92) Postage Charges (USPS)



($0.30) Copy Charges



($33.81) Commissary Sale

$159.57 ($134.24) $39.70

$112.15 ($134.24) $39.70

$110.23 ($134.24) $39.70

$109.31 ($134.24) $39.70

$106.79 ($134.24) $39.70

6 month demand statement $106.49 ($134.24) $39.70

Ticket Number 223205

$5.00 Reservation to SFF- Odrc Pos ExemptionFFF Hold

($10.00) Inmate's Personal Account POS Exemption Transfer

$10.00 Pos Exemption

$18.00 State Pay

POS Exemption Transfer

State Pay

$105.17 ($134.24) $39.70

$102.86 ($134.24) $39.70

$69.05 ($134.24) $39.70

$69.05 ($134.24) $39.70

$59.05 ($134.24) $39.70

$69.05 ($134.24) $39.70

$87.05 ($134.24) $39.70

($3.60) SFF-FFF Hold #1 - Automated FFF-RB $83.45 ($134.24) $39.70Transfer

$3.60 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RB $83.45 ($130.64) $43.30Balance Transfer

($43.30) Payment to PRISONER MAY 2013 PYMT $83.45 ($130.64)ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

($4.50) Payment to Ohio Child MAY 2013 PYMT $78.95 ($130.64)Support Payment Central

$4.50 Reversed Payment to Ohio Reversed Task No. $83.45 ($130.64)Child Support Payment 35007630Central RECEIVED

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Page: 2/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERTA Ki0w 0 9 ?n)l MaCI 11/22/2013^

MaC8 CASHIER'S OFFICE

MaCI

05/0612013 ($4.50) Payment to CHILD MAY 2013 PYMT $78.95 ($130.64) $0.00SUPPORT PAYMENTCENTRAL

MaCi

05/06/2013 ($5.80) Postage Charges (USPS) $73.15 ($130.64) $0.00

MaCI


MaCI

05/0712013 ($26.23) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 223895 $45.40 ($130.64) $0.00

MaCI

05/10/2013 ($0.45) Copy Charges library $44.95 ($130.64) $0.00

MaCI


MaCI


MaC!


MaCi

05/17/2013 ($0.50) JPay Media Credits Automated JPay Media $30.33 ($130.64) $0.00Credits

MaCi

05/21/2013 ($17.50) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 225183 $12.83 ($130.64) $0.00

MaCI

05/22/2013 ($1.20) Copy Charges LIBRARY $11,63 ($130.64) $0.00

MaCI

05123/2013 ($5.80) Postage Charges (USPS) $5.83 ($130.64) $0.00

MaCI


MaCI

06/01/2013 $5.00 Reservation to SFF- Odrc Pos Exemption $3.71 ($130.64) $0.00FFF Hold

MaCI

06/01/2013 $0.00 $10.00 Reservation to Pos Odrc Pos Exemption $3.71 ($130.64) $0.00Exemption

MaCI

06/03/2013 ($0,35) Copy Charges library $3.36 ($130.64) $0.00

MaCI


MaCI

06/05/2013 $4.00 Industrial Arts Commission craft payRECEIVED $4,27 ($130.64) $0,00

Page: 3/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERTA NOV 2 2 2013 MaCt 11/22/2013

MaCI CASHIER'S OFFICE

MaCi

06/07/2013

MaCI

06f07/2013

MaCI

06/07/2013

MaCI

06/07/2013

MaC!

06/07/2013

$18.00 State Pay State Pay

($4.40) SFF-FFF Hold #1 - Automated FFF-RBTransfer


($4.40) Payment to PRISONER June pymtACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

($5.50) Payment to CHILD June pymtSUPPORT PAYMENTCENTRAL

$22.27 ($130.64) $0.00

$17.87 ($130.64) $0.00

$17.87 ($126.24) $4.40

$17.$7 ($126.24) $0.00

$12.37 ($126.24) $0.00

MaCi


MaCI

06/24/2013 $198.50 JPay MoneyOrders 26447396/SNEAD, LUCY $199.54 ($126.24) $0.00

MaCI

06/24/2013 ($39.70) SFF-FFF Hold #1 -Automated FFF-RB $159.84 ($126.24) $0.00Transfer

MaCI

06/24/2013 $39.70 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 -Automated FFF-RB $159.84 ($86.54) $39.70Balance Transfer

MaC1


MaCI


MaCI


MaCI


MaCI

06/27/2013 ($25.00) Withdrawal to COURT OF 36494 $97,42 ($86.54) $39.70CLAIMS

MaCI

06/27/2013 ($25.00) Withdrawal to COURT OF 36494 $72.42 ($86.54) $39.70CLAIMS

MaCf

06/27/2013 $25.00 Reversed Withdrawal to Reversed Task No. $97.42 ($86.54) $39.70COURT OF CLAIMS 35651629

MaCi

07/01/2013 $5.00 Reservation to SFF- Odrc Pos Exemption $97.42 ($86.54) $39.70FFF Hold RECEIVED

Page: 4/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERTA NOV 2 2 2013 ^5 MaCI 11/22/2013

MaCi CASHIER'S OFFICE

MaCI

07/01/2013

MaCI

07/01/2013

MaCi

07/01/2013

MaC1

07/05/2013

MaCI

07/05/2013

MaCI

07/05/2013

MaCI

07/05/2013

MaCI

07/05/2013

($10.00) Inmate's Personal Account POS Exemption Transfer $87.42 ($86.54) $39.70

$10.00 Pos Exemption POS Exemption Transfer $97.42 ($86.54) $39.70

($25.47) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 228069 $71.95 ($86.54) $39.70




($43.30) Payment to PRISONER july paymentACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

($4.50) Payment to CHILD july paymentSUPPORT PA`fMENTCENTRAL

MaCI

07/09/2013 ($29.00) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 228536

MaCI

$89.95 ($86.54) $39.70

$86.35 ($86.54) $39.70

$86.35 ($82.94) $43.30

$86.35 ($82.94) $0.00

$81.85 ($82.94) $0.00

$52.85 ($82.94) $0.00

07/13/2013 $197.00 OffConnect Kiosk Deposit 4594335235124519219/OS $249.85 ($82.94)WALD, DEBORA

MaC!

07/13/2013 ($39.40) SFF-FFF Hold #1 - Automated FFF-RB $210.45 ($82.94)Transfer

MaC1

$0.00

$0.00

07/13/2013 $39.40 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RB $210.45 ($43.54) $39.40Balance Transfer

MaCI


MaC!


MaCI


MaCI

07/23/2013 ($22.74) Commissary Sale

MaC1


MaC1

Page: 5/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERTA

$127.15 ($43.54) $39.40

$124.23 ($43.54) $39.40

Ticket Number 229699 $101.49 ($43.54) $39.40

^^^^^^^D

NOV 22 2013

MaCt CASHIERS OFF1CE

$99.97 ($43.54) $39.40

MaCI 11 /22/2013

07/23/2013

MaCi

07/25/2013

MaCI

07/30/2013

MaC1

08/01 /2013

MaCi

08/01/2013

MaCI

08/01/2013

MaCI

08/02/2013

MaCi

08/02/2013

MaC1

08/06/2013

MaCI

08/09/2013

MaCI

08/09/2013

MaCi

08/09/2013

MaCi

08/09/2013

MaCI

08/09/2013


($4,00) JPay Media Credits Automated JPay MediaCredits



$98.65 ($43.54) $39.40

$94.65 ($43.54) $39.40

$42.26 ($43.54) $39.40

$42.26 ($43.54) $39.40






$18.00 State Pay


POS Exemption Transfer $42.26 ($43.54) $39.40


State Pay

#1 - Automated FFF-RBTransfer


($43.00) Payment to PRISONER August pymtACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

($4.50) Payment to CHILD August pymtSUPPORT PAYMENTCENTRAL

$36.46 ($43.54) $39.40

$34.34 ($43.54) $39.40

$22.56 ($43.54) $39.40

$40.56 ($43.54) $39.40

$36.96 ($43.54) $39.40

$36.96 ($39.94) $43.00

$36.96 ($39.94) $0.00

$32.46 ($39.94) $0.00

MaCI


MaCi


MaCI

09/01/2013 $5.00 Reservation to SFF- Odrc Pos Exemption $8.11 ($39.94) $0.00FFF Hold

MaCI

09/01/2013 $0.00 $10.00 Reservation to Pos Odrc Pos EK%'CEIVED$8.11 ($39.94) $0.00

ExemptionPage: 6/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERT

A NOV 2 2 2013 MaCI 11/22/2013

MaCi CASHIERe^ OFFICE

MaCi

09/05/2013

MaCi

09/05/2013

MaCI

09/06/2013

MaCi

09I06/2013

MaCi

09/06/2013

MaCi

09/06/2013

MaCi

09/06/2013

MaCi

09/10/2013

MaCI

09/28/2013

MaCd

09/28/2013

MaCI

09/28/2013

MaCi

10/01/2013

MaCI

10/01/2013

MaCi

10/01/2013

MaCI

10/01/2013

MaCi

10/04/2013

MaCI

10/04/2013




($3.60) SFF-FFF Hold #1 - Automated FFF-RB $18.47 ($39.94)Transfer

$3.60 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RB $18.47 ($36.34)Balance Transfer

($3.60) Payment to PRISONER September pymt $18.47 ($36.34)ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

($4.50) Payment to CHILD September pymt $13.97 ($36.34)SUPPORT PAYMENTCENTRAL

($13.58) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 233317 $0.39 ($36.34)

$102.00 OffConnect Kiosk Deposit 4710924432211206450/OS $102.39 ($36.34)WALD, DEBORA

($20.40) SFF-FFF Hold #1 - Automated FFF-RB $81.99 ($36.34)Transfer

$0.00

$3.60

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$20.40 Federal Filing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RB $81.99 ($15.94) $20.40Balance Transfer

$5.00 Reservation to SFF- Odrc Pos Exemption $81.99 ($15.94) $20.40FFF Hold




$1$.00 State Pay


I Page: 7/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERT A

POS Exemption Transfer


State Pay

$6.39 ($39.94)

$4.07 ($39.94)

$O.qO

$0.00

$22.07 ($39.94) $0.00

$81.99 ($15.94) $20.40

$34.70 ($15.94) $20.40

$52.70 ($15.94) $20.40

#1 -Automal^^^^^^^^ $49.10 ($15.94) $2q.40Transfer

NOV 2 2 2013 `- MaCi 11/22/2013

MaC1 CASHIER'S OFFICE

MaCI

10/0412013 $3,60 Federal Fifing Fee Remaining #1 - Automated FFF-RBBalance Transfer

MaCi

10/04/2013 ($24.00) Payment to PRISONER OCT. PYMTACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

MaCI

10/04/2013 ($4.50) Payment to CHILD OCT. PYMTSUPPORT PAYMENTCENTRAL

MaCI

10/07/2013 ($34.50) Fundraisers - No Specific cccClub

MaCf

10/08/2013 ($9.26) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 235309

MaCI

11/01/2013

MaCI

11/01/2013

MaC1

11 /05/2013

MaCI

11/05/2013

MaCI

11/05/2013

MaCI

11/07/2013

MaC1

11/08/2013

MaCI

11/08/2013

MaCI


$0.00 $10.00 Reservation to Pos Odrc Pos ExemptionExemption

$49.10 ($12.34) $24.00

$49.10 ($12.34)

$44.60 ($12.34)

$10.10 ($12.34)

$0.84 ($12.34)

$0.84 ($12.34)

$0.84 ($12.34)

$198.50 JPay MoneyOrders 29563039/SNEAD, LUCY $199.34 ($12.34)



($30.00) JPay Media Credits Automated JPay MediaCredits

($6.00) JPay Media Credits Automated JPay MediaCredits


$187.00 ($12.34)

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$187.00 $0.00 $12.34

$157.00 $0.00 $12.34

$151.00 $0.00 $12.34

$169.00 $0.00 $12.34

11/08/2013 ($12.34) Payment to PRISONER NOV PYMT $169.00ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

MaCI

11/08/2013 ($4.50) Payment to CHILD NOV PYMT $164.50SUPPORT PAYMENTCENTRAL

MaCI

11/091

$0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00

2013 697.00 OffConnect Kosk Depostt 4769245606946824499/OS $261.50 $0.00 $0.00DEBOR^^^^^^^^WALD,

Page> 8/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERTA MaCI 11/22/2013

NOV 2 2 2Qi3°^

^^^^ CASHIER'S OFFICE

MaCI

11/10/2013 ($30.00) JPay Media Credits Automated JPay Media $231.50 $0.00 $0.00Credits

MaC1

11/11/2013 ($20.00) JPay Media Credits Automated JPay Media $211.50 $0.00 $0.00Credits

MaCI

11/12/2013 ($10.00) Fundraisers - No Specific CCC-pizza/photos $201.50 $0.00 $0.00Club

MaC1

11/12/2013 ($93.20) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 238282 $108.30 $0.00 $0.00

MaCI

11/1412013 ($39.40) Withdrawal to COURT OF 37748 $68.90 $0.00CLAIMS OF OHIO

MaCI

11/16/2013 ($3.00) JPay Media Credits Automated JPay Media $65.90 $0.00Credits

MaCi

11/19/2013 ($41.24) Commissary Sale Ticket Number 239311 $24.66 $0.00

MaCI

11/22/2013 ($0.30) Copy Charges 6 month demand statement $24.36 $0.00

MaCI

Outstanding Debts:

Start Date Total Debt Paid to DateDescription Case Agency County

10/24/2012 Federal Filing Fee Initial 2:12-cv- PRISONER ($31,36) $31.36Partial 00739 ACCOUNTS

RECEIVABLE10/24/2012 Federal Filing Fee 2:12-cv- PRISONER ($318.64) $318.64

Remaining Balance 00739 ACCOUNTSRECEIVABLE

Totai Outstanding Case Balances $0.00

Outstanding Holds:

Start DateDescription

07/15/2009 Child and SgSupport

Case Agency County Total Debt Paid to Date

701267099 CHILD SUPPORT Clermont $237.94PAYMENTCENTRAL

Total Outstanding Case Hotds $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Owed

$0.00

$0.00

alanceOwed

Outstanding Investments / EPC:

Investment Type J Investment Type Description Invest Company 1 Company Description Balance

RECEIVED

NOV 2 2 '1D 13 ^^

Page: 9/9 A425370 SNEAD, ROBERTA C' C^^^ÊKS OFFICE MaC! 1 1 /22020 1 3

Documents

SUPREME ^OURT OF OHIO CLERK OF COURT 19E^ a statute uses the word shall it will be construed as mandatory. Mhen a statute is mandatory, non-compliance will render the proceedings to