Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Supplementary Information for
A recurrent inactivating mutation in RHOA GTPase
in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma
Hae Yong Yoo1,2*
, Min Kyung Sung3*
, Seung Ho Lee1, Sangok Kim
4,5, Haeseung Lee
4,5, Seongjin Park
3, Sang
Cheol Kim3, Byungwook Lee
3, Kyoohyoung Rho
6, Jong-Eun Lee
6, Kwang-Hwi Cho
7, Wankyu Kim
4,5,
Hyunjung Ju2, Jaesang Kim
4,5, Seok Jin Kim
2,8, Won Seog Kim
2,8, Sanghyuk Lee
4,5 & Young Hyeh Ko
2,9
1Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and
Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 135-710, Korea
2Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center,
Seoul 135-710, Korea
3Korean Bioinformation Center (KOBIC), Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon
305-806, Korea
4Ewha Research Center for Systems Biology (ERCSB), Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-750, Korea
5Department of Life Science, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-750, Korea
6DNA Link Inc., Seoul 138-736, Korea
7School of Systems Biomedical Science, Soongsil University, Seoul 156-743, Korea
8Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan
University School of Medicine, Seoul 135-710, Korea
9Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 135-
710, Korea
*These authors contributed equally to this work.
Correspondence should be addressed to S.L. ([email protected]) or Y.H.K. ([email protected]).
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
2
Table of Contents
Supplementary Tables
Supplementary Table 1. Mapping summary of Exome-seq data ......................................... 3
Supplementary Table 2. Mapping summary of RNA-seq data ........................................... 4
Supplementary Table 3. Clinical information of patients for deep sequencing .................. 5
Supplementary Table 4. Full list of somatic SNVs
Supplementary Table 5. List of nonsynonymous somatic SNVs ........................................ 6
Supplementary Table 6. List of somatic indels (supported by RNA-seq evidence) .......... 10
Supplementary Table 7. Association of RHOA G17V mutation with clinical parameters in
AITL patients........................................................................................................ 11
Supplementary Table 8. Full list differentially expressed genes
Supplementary Table 9. Primer and oligo sequences ....................................................... 12
Supplementary Table 10. List of genes affected by copy number variations
Supplementary Figures
Supplementary Fig. 1. Representative histologic evaluation of the tumor tissue ............. 13
Supplementary Fig. 2. Frozen section of the tumor sample ............................................. 14
Supplementary Fig. 3. Sanger sequencing traces of RHOA G17V mutation in T-cell
lymphoma patients ..................................................................................................... 15
Supplementary Fig. 4. Kaplan-Meier survival plot according to RHOA mutation ........... 16
Supplementary Fig. 5. In vitro proliferation assays .......................................................... 17
Supplementary Fig. 6. Inhibition of the RHOA-ROCK pathway downregulates AKT
phosphorylation and promotes cell proliferation ....................................................... 18
Supplementary Fig. 7. Structural models of wild-type and mutant RHOA proteins ........ 19
Supplementary Fig. 8. Heat map from the hierarchical clustering of DEGs .................... 20
Supplementary Fig. 9. Statistically significant KEGG pathways from GAGE gene set
enrichment analysis ................................................................................................... 21
Supplementary Fig. 10. Comparison of gene expression according to RHOA mutation
status .......................................................................................................................... 22
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
3
Supplementary Table 1. Mapping summary of Exome-seq data
Raw Data Mapping information
Pat No. Raw reads
% of
>=Q30
Bases (PF)
Mean
Quality
Score (PF) QC-passed reads Mapped reads
Mapping
rate
Mean
depth
% bases
above 15
1 blood 61,283,566 0.85 34.15 53,381,183 52,909,911 99.12% 55.82 82.30%
tissue 66,869,132 0.86 34.14 53,531,301 53,059,930 99.12% 57.33 83.50%
2 blood 65,008,414 0.86 34.2 53,707,167 53,271,212 99.19% 59.82 82.60%
tissue 70,942,580 0.87 34.22 60,272,665 59,868,249 99.33% 68.58 84.50%
3 blood 87,213,304 90.29 35.44 69,776,540 68,971,842 98.85% 76.15 87.80%
tissue 180,699,808 89.93 35.33 125,668,538 124,117,767 98.77% 138.72 93.30%
4 blood 90,492,992 90.86 35.61 73,118,305 72,217,348 98.77% 82.6 88.20%
tissue 178,219,562 90.75 35.55 134,493,532 132,857,990 98.78% 162.72 93.20%
5 blood 105,511,824 89.42 35.18 82,089,637 81,111,144 98.81% 88.6 89.50%
tissue 182,598,358 89.05 35.05 118,088,184 116,523,954 98.68% 134.67 93.30%
Average 108,883,954 54.37 34.89 82,412,705 81,490,935 98.94% 92.501 87.82%
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
4
Supplementary Table 2. Mapping summary of RNA-seq data
RNA-Seq 9 patients Mapping information
Pat No. Raw reads
% of
>=Q30
Bases
Mean
Quality
Score QC-passed reads Mapped reads
Mapping
rate
Mean
depth
1 76,232,830 83.66 33.28 74,783,379 55,613,975 74.37% 39.01
2 67,626,174 85.08 33.75 66,444,218 52,799,086 79.46% 37.03
3 93,631,482 90.21 35.21 92,925,993 63,313,998 68.13% 44.41
4 96,893,070 90.79 35.4 96,222,402 75,749,873 78.72% 53.13
5 91,702,468 89.72 35.05 90,987,093 60,439,135 66.43% 42.39
6 59,876,636 83.51 33.23 58,695,147 40,062,652 68.26% 28.10
7 54,832,758 88.43 34.71 54,194,570 37,698,202 69.56% 26.44
8 72,563,038 83.96 33.37 71,132,134 52,428,999 73.71% 36.77
9 61,191,174 84.57 33.58 60,098,281 45,532,531 75.76% 31.94
Average 74,949,959 86.66 34.18 73,942,580 53,737,606 72.71% 37.69
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
5
Supplementary Table 3. Clinical information of patients for deep sequencing.
Patient
ID
Age/
Sex
Tumor
Tissue Stage Treatment
Follow
up
(months)
Outcome
Exome-Seq RNA-
Seq
Normal
(buffy
coat)
Tumor
(fresh
tissue)
Tumor
(fresh
tissue)
PAT1 38/M LN IV CHOP +
PBST 26 DOD O O O
PAT2 41/F LN III CHOP +
PBST 29 CR O O O
PAT3 75/M LN IV CHOP 18 AWD O O O
PAT4 73/M LN III CHOP 16 CR O O O
PAT5 70/M LN IV CHOP Lost O O O
PAT6 67/M LN IV CHOP 5 DOD X X O
PAT7 65/M LN IV Steroid 2 DOD X X O
PAT8 77/M LN IV CHOP 23 CR-Recur X X O
PAT9 75/M LN IV CHOP 24 CR X X O
PAT: patient, LN: lymph node, CHOP: chemotherapy regimen. C: cyclophosphamide, H: hydroxydaunorubicin, O:
oncovin, P: prednisone. PBST: peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, DOD: died of disease, CR: complete
remission, AWD: alive with disease
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
6
Supplementary Table 5. List of nonsynonymous somatic SNVs
Exome-seq RNA-seq
Normal Tumor Tumor
No. Gene ID RNA
support
CHR POS Transcript ID REF ALT AA Change REF ALT REF ALT REF ALT PAT
No.
Other patients of
RNA support TYPE*
Sanger
Valid.**
1 ABCB10 FALSE 1 229676372 NM_012089 C A R395L 104 0 90 4 87 0 2 NS
2 ADAMTS7 TRUE 15 79058445 NM_014272 G A P1270S 14 0 13 4 0 2 2 NS
3 ALDH2 FALSE 12 112221046 NM_000690 G T G102C 31 0 18 5 123 0 2 NS
4 ALPP
FALSE 2 233245026 NM_001632 G A R263H 66 1 84 11 0 0 3 NS O
5 FALSE 2 233246249 NM_001632 A G E451G 24 0 46 3 0 0 4 NS X
6 ANKRD11 FALSE 16 89349909 NM_001256183* C A G1014V 112 0 133 6 55 0 1 NS
7 AQP5 FALSE 12 50355970 NM_001651 C T A57V 23 0 22 4 0 0 1 NS
8 ASPH FALSE 8 62596650 NM_001164755* C G W67C 124 0 129 19 71 0 2 NS
9 BMP5 FALSE 6 55638913 NM_021073 G A R321X 190 1 346 17 3 0 4 SG
10 CCNL2 FALSE 1 1333667 NM_030937* C T R140H 62 0 64 4 162 0 2 NS
11 CD28
TRUE 2 204591454 NM_006139 T G F51V 129 1 186 16 235 34 5 NS X
12 TRUE 2 204599555 NM_001243077* A C T195P 53 0 38 8 136 60 1 4,7 NS O
13 CEACAM3 FALSE 19 42312901 NM_001277163* G C G159R 101 0 78 16 3 0 2 NS
14 CEL FALSE 9 135946015 NM_001807 T C I488T 57 1 99 6 21 0 3 NS
15 CHIT1 TRUE 1 203186950 NM_003465* C T W358X 22 0 28 6 776 2 1 SG
16 CNOT4 FALSE 7 135048804 NM_001190850* C T V548I 198 0 220 8 12 0 1 2,4,5,8 NS X
17 CNPPD1 TRUE 2 220041022 NM_015680 C T R34Q 41 0 103 7 199 8 4 NS
18 CRYBA2 FALSE 2 219855683 NM_057093* C T G113R 76 0 80 8 0 0 1 NS
19 CSF1R FALSE 5 149459846 NM_005211 G A Q121X 17 0 23 7 61 0 2 SG
20 CSPP1 FALSE 8 68024292 NM_024790 C A N402K 100 0 85 4 10 0 1 NS
21 CTNNB1 TRUE 3 41266137 NM_001904* C A S45Y 49 0 67 5 337 14 1 NS
22 CXorf22 FALSE X 35985846 NM_152632 C A H571N 60 0 50 4 0 0 2 NS
23 CYP2A7 FALSE 19 41381771 NM_030589* T A N387Y 17 1 22 5 0 0 1 NS
24 DAB1 FALSE 1 57537223 NM_021080 T A D177V 112 0 115 18 0 0 2 NS
25 DEFB116 FALSE 20 29891127 NM_001037731 T G K66T 187 0 218 19 0 0 2 NS
26 DENND1B TRUE 1 197515066 NM_001195215 T C T446A 51 0 32 4 62 5 4 NS O
27 DFNA5 FALSE 7 24756986 NM_001127453* G A A195V 31 0 14 4 41 0 1 NS
28 DPY19L2 TRUE 12 63964599 NM_173812 T C I647V 119 1 92 11 1 1 5 NS
29 EEPD1 FALSE 7 36324428 NM_030636 A C K392T 38 0 31 6 8 0 2 NS
30 EIF3A TRUE 10 120810098 NM_003750 C T R803K 240 0 235 7 312 1 1 7 NS X
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
7
31 EPC1 TRUE 10 32594852 NM_001272004* T A H54L 62 0 71 8 30 9 1 NS X
32 EZH2 TRUE 7 148525895 NM_004456* C T D188N 122 0 159 9 173 14 5 NS X
33 FABP2 FALSE 4 120241902 NM_000134 T C T55A 79 0 93 6 0 0 1 NS
34 FAM47A FALSE X 34148082 NM_203408 T C I772V 103 0 153 9 0 0 5 NS
35 FAT4 FALSE 4 126242449 NM_024582 T G V1628G 116 0 220 7 5 0 4 NS
36 FGF18 FALSE 5 170863155 NM_003862 C A A43D 18 0 45 3 1 0 5 NS
37 FKBP9 FALSE 7 33039753 NM_007270 T C I418T 140 0 297 17 67 0 4 NS
38 GLE1 FALSE 9 131289735 NM_001499* G A A415T 40 0 35 3 81 0 2 NS
39 GNAQ
FALSE 9 80537095 NM_002072 G T Y101X 42 0 43 3 58 0 1 SG
40 FALSE 9 80537112 NM_002072 T A T96S 50 1 47 3 68 0 1 NS
41 GOLGA6L6 FALSE 15 20739739 NM_001145004 A G W671R 12 0 22 7 0 0 3 NS
42 GPAT2 FALSE 2 96688961 NM_207328 G A S681L 33 0 22 7 5 0 1 NS
43 GPD2 TRUE 2 157426609 NM_001083112* A G H496R 58 1 53 14 47 4 1 NS O
44 GRID2 FALSE 4 94137973 NM_001510 C T Q292X 147 0 255 10 0 0 4 SG
45 H6PD TRUE 1 9324122 NM_004285 C G Q524E 88 1 130 15 36 1 5 NS
46 HEYL FALSE 1 40092744 NM_014571 C T R141H 15 0 26 4 2 0 2 NS
47 HGF FALSE 7 81335621 NM_000601* A T V580D 106 0 175 8 3 0 4 NS
48 HIVEP1 TRUE 6 12124184 NM_002114 A G K1386E 160 0 326 15 45 7 4 NS X
49 IDH2 TRUE 15 90631837 NM_002168 C G R172S 57 0 79 4 798 144 5 NS X
50 IQSEC3 FALSE 12 176089 NM_001170738 A G Y14C 19 1 52 5 0 0 4 NS
51 KIF7 TRUE 15 90176073 NM_198525 C A S958I 11 0 10 10 1 3 1 8 NS O
52 KRT4 FALSE 12 53207583 NM_002272 C G G87A 111 0 196 10 0 0 5 NS
53 KRT8
FALSE 12 53298675 NM_001256293* A C S31A 25 0 79 4 10 0 3 NS
54 FALSE 12 53298699 NM_001256293* G A R23C 33 0 77 5 10 0 3 NS
55 KRTAP4-3 FALSE 17 39324333 NM_033187 T A Q31L 77 0 64 22 0 0 2 NS
56
LILRB1
TRUE 19 55147987 NM_006669* G C E564Q 27 0 60 6 106 2 2 NS O
57 FALSE 19 55147987 NM_001081639* G C E565Q 54 0 138 15 294 0 4 NS O
58 TRUE 19 55147988 NM_006669* A C E564A 27 0 60 6 104 2 2 NS O
59 FALSE 19 55147988 NM_001081639* A C E565A 52 1 140 15 287 0 4 NS O
60 LRRK2 FALSE 12 40681333 NM_198578 A T D894V 39 1 38 11 27 0 1 NS
61 LYZL4 FALSE 3 42448394 NM_144634 C T R79H 25 0 22 6 0 0 1 NS
62 MAGEB6 FALSE X 26213093 NM_173523 C T A377V 44 0 38 3 0 0 1 NS
63 MLL3 TRUE 7 151848624 NM_170606 C G S4190T 33 0 21 5 23 3 1 NS
64 MPRIP TRUE 17 17078670 NM_201274* G A G885S 17 0 28 10 84 16 1 NS X
65 MUC12 FALSE 7 100634964 NM_001164462 C A P374T 164 0 166 6 0 0 1 NS O
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
8
66 MUC17 FALSE 7 100682139 NM_001040105 T C V2481A 286 1 233 50 0 0 1 NS O
67
MUC2
FALSE 11 1092827 NM_002457 C A T1549N 41 1 105 8 0 0 4 NS X
68 FALSE 11 1092947 NM_002457 C A T1589N 72 1 177 8 0 0 5 NS X
69 FALSE 11 1093004 NM_002457 c A P1608H 72 1 142 7 0 0 3 NS X
70 NEIL3 FALSE 4 178274835 NM_018248 A C Q471H 90 0 99 5 33 0 1 2,3,8,9 NS O
71 NT5C3A
FALSE 7 33054388 NM_016489* T C D283G 56 0 64 5 119 0 1 NS X
72 FALSE 7 33054388 NM_016489* T C D283G 77 0 111 6 210 0 4 NS X
73 OR1B1 FALSE 9 125391127 NM_001004450 C T A230T 27 0 31 3 0 0 1 NS
74 PAPLN TRUE 14 73718820 NM_173462 G A W286X 11 0 8 6 18 8 1 SG O
75 PAPPA FALSE 9 119115101 NM_002581 C T R1361W 32 0 35 10 1 0 1 NS
76 PARD3 TRUE 10 34671609 NM_001184793* T C R420G 50 0 54 4 24 6 2 NS X
77 PARP4 FALSE 13 25052393 NM_006437 G T H490Q 55 1 90 9 107 0 3 NS
78 PCDHA12 FALSE 5 140255657 NM_031864* G T L200F 124 0 130 6 0 0 1 NS
79 PCDHGB7 FALSE 5 140798759 NM_018927* G A V445I 166 0 363 11 7 0 4 NS
80 PDE4DIP FALSE 1 144856817 NM_001198834* T C E2223G 24 0 26 5 57 0 1 NS O
81 PHIP TRUE 6 79675701 NM_017934 A G L1093P 145 0 184 6 55 1 1 4,7,8,9 NS O
82 PLCG1 TRUE 20 39792584 NM_002660* C T S345F 45 0 29 8 118 44 1 NS O
83 PLEKHD1 FALSE 14 69993469 NM_001161498 T C S327P 15 1 22 5 3 0 1 NS
84 POM121 FALSE 7 72409928 NM_001257190* G A R209K 105 1 142 9 97 0 5 NS
85 PRKRIR
FALSE 11 76072076 NM_004705 G A A81V 61 0 74 4 162 0 3 NS
86 TRUE 11 76072085 NM_004705 C T R78Q 57 0 71 4 133 1 3 NS
87 PSORS1C1 FALSE 6 31106516 NM_014068 C T P43S 106 0 101 5 0 0 1 NS
88 PTPRU FALSE 1 29606644 NM_001195001* C T A620V 17 0 19 8 0 0 1 NS
89 RASA2 FALSE 3 141305584 NM_006506 C A H641Q 45 0 54 4 39 0 5 NS
90 RFC2 FALSE 7 73663432 NM_002914* C T G81D 81 0 115 5 142 0 4 NS
91 RGL4 FALSE 22 24034987 NM_153615 C A H169N 35 0 67 4 20 0 1 NS
92 RHOA
TRUE 3 49412973 NM_001664 C A G17V 87 0 65 8 1171 271 2 4,5,6,7,8,9 NS O
93 TRUE 3 49412973 NM_001664 C A G17V 107 1 257 17 1527 123 4 2,5,6,7,8,9 NS O
94 ROPN1L TRUE 5 10461378 NM_031916* C T T167M 73 1 64 11 2 1 1 NS
95 SHROOM4 FALSE X 50339869 NM_020717 A C F1436L 10 1 7 4 3 0 1 NS
96 SLC4A8 TRUE 12 51856122 NM_001258401* A C K324T 82 1 74 10 5 3 1 NS
97 SMARCD1 TRUE 12 50484328 NM_139071* C T A363V 58 1 104 14 145 27 5 NS O
98 SPRY2 FALSE 13 80911723 NM_005842 C A V40F 39 0 52 3 15 0 2 NS
99 SSX5 FALSE X 48054519 NM_021015 A C L39R 55 0 39 3 0 0 1 NS
100 STAB2 FALSE 12 104140461 NM_017564 G A G2075S 109 1 103 20 11 0 1 NS
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
9
101 TATDN2 TRUE 3 10318105 NM_014760 C T R632X 86 0 75 8 110 11 2 SG O
102 TCF4 FALSE 18 52927188 NM_001243230* G T S352Y 155 0 150 6 115 0 5 NS
103 TET2
TRUE 4 106156729 NM_017628* C T R544X 57 1 55 16 21 2 1 SG X
104 FALSE 4 106194075 NM_001127208 G C E1513Q 43 0 40 16 30 0 2 NS X
105 TM4SF19 FALSE 3 196054377 NM_001204898* C T A29T 68 0 109 5 1 0 5 NS
106 TMEM14B FALSE 6 10756728 NM_030969* C T R108C 53 1 39 5 252 0 2 NS
107 TMPRSS7 FALSE 3 111775937 NM_001042575 G T M297I 57 0 50 12 0 0 1 NS
108 TSG101 FALSE 11 18528459 NM_006292 G A P165S 66 0 67 4 264 0 2 NS
109 TUB FALSE 11 8115674 NM_003320* C T A167V 26 0 35 11 7 0 2 NS
110 UNC5C FALSE 4 96171704 NM_003728 A C Y237D 209 0 240 8 1 0 5 NS
111 USP8 FALSE 15 50784955 NM_001128610* C A N764K 42 0 56 8 106 0 2 NS X
112 VAV1 TRUE 19 6833596 NM_001258206* G T E556D 47 0 43 11 189 40 1 NS O
113 VSIG2 FALSE 11 124620772 NM_014312 A T S89T 70 0 116 5 1 0 5 NS
114 VWA7 FALSE 6 31733811 NM_025258 G A S783L 101 0 111 6 2 0 2 NS
115 WDR64 FALSE 1 241929579 NM_144625 T A Y659X 170 0 326 10 0 0 4 SG
116 XRCC6BP1 TRUE 12 58335626 NM_033276 A T S48C 14 0 9 19 18 5 2 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 NS O
117 ZNF133 TRUE 20 18297101 NM_003434* G A G535S 25 0 18 4 12 1 1 NS
118 ZNF717 FALSE 3 75787049 NM_001128223 C A K575N 9 0 10 5 2 0 4 NS
119 ZNF814 TRUE 19 58385748 NM_001144989 G A A337V 123 0 105 51 2 3 2 3,4,5 NS
- Asterisk in transcript ID indicates that other overlapping transcripts with the same characteristics exist.
- A full list, including synonymous SNVs, is provided in Supplementary File 1.
*NS = nonsynonymous; SG = stopgain
**Sanger validation indicates unambiguous results only.
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
10
Supplementary Table 6. List of somatic indels (supported by RNA-seq evidence)
Exome-seq RNA-seq
Normal Tumor Tumor
No. Gene ID CHR POS Transcript ID REF ALT AA Change REF ALT REF ALT REF ALT PAT TYPE
**
Sanger
Valid.***
1 C19orf33 19 38795550 NM_033520 G
GAAGAAGGAG
AAGGGC K89delinsKKKEKG 31 1 37 7 5 1 4 IF
2 CNPY3 6 42897357 NM_006586 TTGC T 17_18del 19 0 20 3 199 4 5 IF
3 FNBP4 11 47788663 NM_015308 CGGTGGT C 58_59del 5 0 0 3 22 8 1 IF O
4 HLA-DPB1 6 33048688 NM_002121 G GA G114fs 29 0 65 2 1494 4 3 FS O
5 HLA-DPB1 6 33048688 NM_002121 G GA G114fs 33 0 70 3 2105 10 4 FS O
6 HRCT1 9 35906583 NM_001039792 TCCA T 100_101del 1 0 4 2 0 1 5 IF
7 LOC100132247 16 22545743 NM_001135865
TTCCACCC
TCAGC T 480_484del 856 1 1259 746 271 1 3 IF
8 LOC283710 15 31521505 NM_001243538 CGG C 25_26del 0 0 0 3 10 30 3 FS X
9 LOC283710 15 31521505 NM_001243538 CG C R26fs 0 0 0 3 12 14 4 FS X
10 LSR 19 35758275 NM_205835* G GGGA G450delinsGR 2 0 4 5 20 15 2 IF O
11 MAZ 16 29821435 NM_002383* AGCGGCG A 440_441del 4 0 6 4 213 44 2 IF O
12 NCOA3 20 46279836 NM_181659* A ACAGCAG Q1254delinsQQQ 68 1 59 64 146 10 3 IF O
13 NEFH 22 29885567 NM_021076 A
AAAGTCCCCT
GAGAAGGCC
A646delinsAKSPEK
A 156 1 2 133 7 1 2 IF X
14 PDCD6 5 271857 NM_001267559* CCCGGCCCTGGGG C 8_12del 7 0 3 2 98 39 1 IF
15 SCAF1 19 50155361 NM_021228 G GCCGCTC R572delinsRRS 1 0 1 5 75 22 4 IF
16 SCAF1 19 50155361 NM_021228 GCCGCTC G 572_574del 7 0 1 2 40 11 5 IF
17 SCARF2 22 20779973 NM_182895* C CG E764fs 0 0 0 3 2 1 4 FS
18 ZNF579 19 56089908 NM_152600 C CCCG G366delinsGG 6 0 4 2 1 5 4 IF O
19 ZNF579 19 56089908 NM_152600 C CCCG G366delinsGG 3 0 5 3 3 3 5 IF O
*Asterisk in transcript ID indicates that other overlapping transcripts with the same characteristics exist.
**IF = in-frame indels; FS = frame-shift indels
***Sanger validation indicates unambiguous results only.
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
11
Supplementary Table 7. Association of RHOA G17V mutation with clinical parameters in AITL
patients
All patients (n=45)
RHOA wild-type (n=21)
RHOA G17V mutant (n=24)
P-value
Median age, years (range) 64 (35–83) 63 (35-77) 64.5 (38-83)
Age, no. (%) 60 years or less Older than 60 years
16 (36%) 29 (64%)
8 (38%) 13 (62%)
8 (33%) 16 (67%)
0.765
Sex, no. (%) Male Female
32 (71%) 13 (29%)
15 (71%) 6 (29%)
17 (71%) 7 (29%)
1.0
Ann Arbor stage, no. (%) Limited, I–II Advanced, III–IV
2 (5%) 42 (95%)
0 (0%) 21 (100%)
2 (10%) 21 (90%)
0.491
Extranodal involvement, no. (%) 0 or 1 2 or more
31 (72%) 12 (28%)
14 (67%) 7 (33%)
17 (77%) 5 (23%)
0.855
Lactic dehydrogenase, no. (%) Upper limit or below Over upper limit
10 (22%) 35 (78%)
5 (24%) 16 (76%)
5 (21%) 19 (79%)
0.711
IPI risk groups, no. (%) Low/low intermediate High intermediate/high
13 (30%) 30 (70%)
8 (38%) 13 (62%)
5 (23%) 17 (77%)
0.762
Bone marrow involvement, no. (%) Negative Positive
29 (64%) 16 (36%)
13 (62%) 8 (38%)
16 (67%) 8 (23%)
0.765
Primary treatment, no. (%) CHOP Others
37 (84%) 8 (16%)
19 (90%) 2 (10%)
18 (75%) 6 (25%)
0.401
Response to frontline Tx, no. (%) CR Non-CR
25 (56%) 20 (44%)
12 (57%) 9 (43%)
13 (54%) 11 (46%)
0.617
Death, no. (%) Alive, no. (%)
24 (56%) 19 (44%)
10 (50%) 10 (50%)
14 (61%) 9 (39%)
0.547
Median survival (months) 4513.26 45.2323.03 21.9015.09 0.509 (LogRank)
* Data were missing as follows: Ann Arbor stage (n = 1), no. of extranodal involvement (n = 2), IPI risk
groups (n = 2), death (n=2), IPI, International Prognostic Index; CHOP, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin,
vincristine, and prednisone; Tx, treatment; CR, complete response
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
12
Supplementary Table 9. Primer and oligo sequences
Objective Sequences
PCR amplification
of RHOA mutation
5'- GTATACTCACCTGCTTTCCATCCACC- 3'
and 5'-CAGCAATGGCTGCCATCCGGAAG-3'
Sanger sequencing
of RHOA 5'- CCTGCTTTCCATCCACCTCGATATC- 3'
siRNA for RHOA
inhibition GGGCUAAGUAAAUAGGAAU
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
13
Supplementary Fig. 1. Representative histologic evaluation of the tumor tissue. (a) Classical
morphology with effacement of normal architecture and marked vascular proliferation
associated with aggregates of atypical lymphoid cells (H&E staining). (b) The majority of
atypical cells express CD3. (c) CD21 immunostaining showing hyperplastic follicular dendritic
cell meshwork. (d) A portion of tumor cells express CD10. (e) Some tumor cells express
CXCL13. (f) PD-1 is expressed in some neoplastic cells.
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
14
Supplementary Fig. 2. Frozen section of the tumor sample showing hypercellular lymphoid
tissue without necrosis (H&E staining).
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
15
Supplementary Fig. 3. Sanger sequencing traces of RHOA G17V mutation in T cell lymphoma
patients. Patient ID with RHOA G17V mutation is indicated by red text and arrows.
Representative traces of wild-type and G17V mutant RHOA are shown in the top left panel. The
horizontal red arrow shows the direction of genomic DNA sequencing. The mutant sequence
shows a clear heterozygous mutation. Traces from tumor samples obtained from 45 AITL, 20
NK/T cell and 13 PTCL-NOS patients are shown in the rectangles. Patients 5, 6, 9, 10, 29, 30
and 43 in the AITL group showed the mutant as the dominant peak. The other 17 AITL patients
showed the heterozygous mutation clearly. All three NK/T cell patients with somatic mutation
showed the heterozygous genotype. Only one PTCL-NOS patient showed a heterozygous
mutation. Sequencing trace chromatograms are representative of at least three independent
experiments.
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
16
Supplementary Fig. 4. Kaplan-Meier survival plot according to RHOA mutation.
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
17
Supplementary Fig. 5. In vitro proliferation assays in (a) the SUP-T1 cell line and (b) the
MOLT-4 cell line. Cells expressing inactive RHOA (G17V and T19N) displayed enhanced cell
proliferation. P < 0.01 compared with the cells expressing WT. Each condition with three
replicates were repeated three times and expressed as mean ± s.d.
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
18
Supplementary Fig. 6. Inhibition of the RHOA-ROCK pathway downregulates AKT
phosphorylation and promotes cell proliferation. (a) After transfection of Jurkat cells with
control siRNA or RHOA siRNA, AKT phosphorylation levels and cell proliferation were
assessed. Cell lysates were prepared 48 h after transfection and processed for immunoblotting
with the indicated antibodies. The extent of RHOA depletion was determined by
immunoblotting with anti-RHOA antibodies. As a loading control, -tubulin was used. Cells
transfected with siRNA were incubated for 48 h, and relative cell proliferation was determined
using a cell counting kit (CCK-8). Five replicates of each condition were repeated three times;
the data are expressed as mean ± s.d. (b) After treatment with the ROCK inhibitor, Y-27632 (30
M), AKT phosphorylation levels and cell proliferation were measured. Cell lysates were
prepared 48 h after treatment and processed for immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies.
Cells treated with Y-27632 were incubated for 48 h, and relative cell proliferation was
determined using a cell counting kit (CCK-8). Five replicates of each condition were repeated
three times, and the data are expressed as mean ± s.d.
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
19
Supplementary Fig. 7. Structural models of wild-type and mutant RHOA proteins. Homology
modeling was based on the PDB structure of 3LXR. GTP substrate and its ribose moiety are
indicated in yellow and pink, respectively. The glycine and valine residues are shown in green
and red, respectively.
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
20
Supplementary Fig. 8. Heat map from the hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed
genes. AITL patients from our study (PAT1-PAT9) and GSE6338 (AITL1-AITL6) were
included. Normal control samples are indicated as CD4+. Gene clusters from hierarchical
classification were subjected to the DAVID web server for Gene Ontology analysis, and the
most enriched term for each cluster was determined using the q value from the FDR test.
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
21
Supplementary Fig. 9. Statistically significant KEGG pathways from GAGE gene set
enrichment analysis. Pathways are grouped into functional categories. Up- and downregulated
pathways are indicated in pink and green backgrounds. Numbers of SNVs, indels, CNVs, and
DEGs indicate the number of genes affected in each pathway.
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916
22
Supplementary Fig. 10. Comparison of gene expression according to RHOA mutation status.
(a) Patients of wild-type RHOA (PAT1 and PAT3). (b) Patients with G17V RHOA mutation
(PAT2 and PAT4-PAT9).
Nature Genetics: doi:10.1038/ng.2916