Supplemental Grad Rate Slides

7/28/2019 Supplemental Grad Rate Slides

1/109

Graduation Rates:

Students Who Started 9th

Gradein 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008

Supplemental Packet


2/109

2

Federal regulations require states to report graduation rates using a new

federal cohort definition

1.Under New Yorks old cohort definition, students who have beenenrolled in a school or district for fewer than five months are not counted in

the cohort for graduation rate reporting purposes. The new federal definition

includes in the cohort any student who has been enrolled one day or

longer.

2. Under the old cohort definition, students who are incarcerated areconsidered transfers and are not included in the cohort for graduation rate

reporting purposes. The new federal cohort definition will count incarcerated

youth as transfers only if the student attends a program offering courses that

can result in the earning of credit toward a high school diploma.

Incarcerated youth who do not attend these types of programs count

as dropouts.

3. Under the old cohort definition, ungraded students with disabilities are

counted in a cohort based on the school year in which they reach age 17.

The new federal cohort definition requires that all students be counted in a

cohort based upon the year in which they first entered a ninth grade

program.

Revised Cohort Definitions


3/109

Revised Cohort Definitions

These revised cohort definitions apply to the 2008

cohort results after 4 years, 2007 cohort results

after 4 and 5 years, and the 2006 cohort results

after 5 and 6 years.

These rules now apply to all school districts,

including Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and

Yonkers.

Aggregations for New York City (city-wide results),

Need/Resource Capacity categories (N/RC), and

other statewide aggregations (e.g., race/ethnicity,

etc.) have always used the one-day enrollment

rule. 3


4/109

4

Aspirational Performance Measures (APMs) were calculated based on the

total number of students in the 2008 and 2007 cohorts as of June 2012 and

2011, respectively (including students who dropped out or transferred to an

approved GED program).

Graduation rate is the percentage of these students who graduated with a

Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma.

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation requires 22 units of credit,

passing 7 to 9 Regents examinations with 65 or above, and advanced course

sequences in languages other than English, CTE, or the arts.

ELA/Math APM is the percentage of these students who graduated with aLocal, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma and scored*:

75 or higher on the English Regents examination, and

80 or higher on a mathematics Regents examination

* Or who achieved the minimum score accepted by the Department on an approved alternative to a Regents examination (see

http://www.p12.nysed.gov/apda/hsgen/archive/list.pdf).

Aspirational Performance Measures - Definitions


5/109

55

IEP Diploma, 1.3%

Still Enrolled, 15.2%

Transferred to GED

Program, 1.0%Dropped Out, 8.4%

Graduated, 74.0%

Statewide,74.0% of students who started 9th grade

in 2008 graduated by June 2012, while 15.2% of

students were still enrolled.

2008 Total Cohort

Students = 221,366

All Students in

Public Schools


6/109

66

IEP Diploma

1.2%

Still Enrolled

12.5%

Transferred to GED

Program

1.0%Dropped Out

8.4%

Graduated

76.7%

Statewide, 76.7% of students who started 9th grade

in 2008 graduated by August 2012, while 12.5%

were still enrolled.

2008 Total Cohort

Students = 221,366

All Students in

Public Schools


7/109

77

50.0

%6

5.1

% 77.4

%

84.8

%

74.0%

93.9

%

60.4

%

64.7

%

53.5

%6

9.3

% 78.8

%

8

6.5

%

76.7%

94.7

%

New York City Large City Urban-

Suburban

Rural Average Low Total Public

2008 Cohort through June 2008 Cohort through August

For students who entered 9th grade in 2008, inclusion

of August 2012 graduates increased the statewide

graduation rate by more than 2 percentage points

compared to the June 2012 rateStatewide,6,096 students earned diplom as in Au gus t 2012.


8/109

88

Statewide the percentage of graduates earning a Regents,

Advanced Regents, or Local Diploma

43.4% 41.8% 42.0% 41.4% 40.4% 40.2% 38.8% 39.2% 38.6% 39.4%

40.3% 43.7% 45.4%48.8%

40.4% 43.8% 45.5%49.2%

40.2%43.6% 45.4%

16.2% 19.4% 17.5%15.3% 12.2%

38.1% 38.5%

54.7%

16.1%18.4%20.3%

14.5% 12.6%9.8%

4.9%

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2004

2005

2006

2007

2004

2005

2006

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma

Four Years Five Years Six Years


9/109

999

Statewide

78.9

%

78.3

%

79.7

%

73.4

%79.2

%

80.9

%

80.0

%

74.0

%

70.9

%77.4

%

71.8

%

74.0

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

Percentage of Students Statewide Graduating with Regents or Local DiplomaResults Through June

Cohort Membership

2004 223,726

2005 224,822

2006 224,744

2007 223,285

2008 221,366


10/109

101010

New York City

69.2

%

6

7.8

%

70.9

%

61.0%

69.4

%

73.2

%

60.9

% 70.2

%

60.4

%

56.4% 6

6.1

%

59.0

%


2004 Chort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June

Cohort Membership

2004 75,009

2005 77,378

2006 78,346

2007 79,476

2008 79,719


11/109

111111

57

.0%

61.7

%

62.6

%

47.4

%52.1

%

53.0%

54.

0%

58.0

%

46.8

% 55.5

%

51.8

%

53.1%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

Buffalo

Cohort Membership

2004 3,083

2005 2,248

2006 3,479

2007 2,653

2008 2,948

Because of a one-time change in 8th grade promotion policy,

the 2005 and 2006 total cohort enrollments in Buffalo are

significantly smaller and larger, respectively, than earlier

cohorts. Cohort size decreased again for the 2007 Cohort.

Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years

Results Through June

* *

* These cohorts include students enrolled for at least oneday in a school or the district

* * *


12/109

121212

59.6

%

50.6%

53.6

%

46.1

% 54.7

%

58

.0%

45.5

% 54.0

%

43.4

%48.4

% 57.1

%

42.1

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

Rochester

Cohort Membership

2004 2,220

2005 2,924

2006 2,670

2007 2,873

2008 2,564




* *** *


13/109

131313

5

8.7

%

54.2

%

56

.3%

45.9

% 53.

9%

55

.9%

48.4% 56

.4%

48.0% 56

.2%

47.3

%

45.2

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

Syracuse

Cohort Membership

2004 1,506

2005 1,528

2006 1,571

2007 1,673

2008 1,547




* ** * *


14/109

141414

68.1

%

66.7

%

68.0

%

63.2

%71.2

%

72.2

%

66.2

%74.4

%

66.0

%

58.1

% 67.4

%

58.1

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

Yonkers

Cohort Membership

2004 1,831

2005 2,072

2006 1,673

2007 1,858

2008 1,814




* ** * *


15/109

151515

The graduation rate for Black students

67.1

%

65.3

%

68.2

%

57.7

% 66.8

%

70.2

%

58.4

% 68.0

%

58.1

%

54.2

% 64.0

%

55.7

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort2008 Cohort



Cohort Membership

2004 42,590

2005 43,837

2006 44,615

2007 44,072

2008 42,982


16/109

161616

The graduation rate for Hispanic

students

65.8%

65.0

%

67

.9%

57.3

% 66.

2%

69.8

%

58.0

% 67

.7%

57.8

%62.7

%

52.2

%

54.8

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort




Cohort Membership

2004 40,498

2005 42,635

2006 43,349

2007 45,455

2008 46,337


17/109

171717

The graduation rate of

students with disabilities

51.9

%

50.4

%

52.7

%

44.1

%50.1

%

53.3

%

44.6

% 52.1

%

44.7

%49.5

%

41.5

%

42.1

%


2004 Cohort


2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort



Cohort Membership

2004 31,252

2005 32,058

2006 32,696

2007 32,917

2008 33,833


18/109

181818

The graduation rate for ELL students

53.5

%

51.7

%55.5

%

51.7

% 56.7

%

38.2

%

51.6

%

34.3

%

35.7

%

4

9.2

%

38.6

%

40.3

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort




Cohort Membership

2004 10,057

2005 11,265

2006 11,635

2007 12,236

2008 11,986


19/109

1919

The Graduation Rate for Black Students

9.2% 9.5% 9.5% 9.0% 9.3% 9.6% 9.7% 9.4% 9.7%

30.9%34.0%

38.9%44.7%

34.3%37.7%

43.6%

35.1%38.9%

15.6%14.1%

10.0%4.4%

21.7%19.5%

14.7%

23.8%21.6%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006



58.4%

66.8%

68.2%

55.7%57.7%

65.3%

The percentage of Black students in the cohort earning a Local,

Regents or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma

Cohort Membership

2005 43,837

2006 44,6152007 44,072

2008 42,982

58.1%

68.0%

70.2%


20/109

2020

The Graduation Rate for Hispanic Students

11.3% 11.7% 11.9% 12.1% 11.5% 11.7% 12.1% 11.5% 11.8%

28.8%33.2%

37.3%42.4%

32.8%37.0%

42.4%

33.8%38.5%

14.8%

12.4%8.8%

3.3%20.7%

17.5%

13.2%

22.6%19.4%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local DiplomaFour Years Five Years

Six Years

58.0%

66.2% 67.9%

54.8%

57.3%

65.0%

The percentage of Hispanic students in the cohort earning a Local,

Regents or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma

Cohort Membership

2005 42,635

2006 43,3492007 45,455

2008 46,337

57.8%

67.7%69.8%


21/109

2121

The Graduation Rate for English Language Learners

5.9% 6.1% 5.2% 5.6% 6.6% 6.5% 6.7% 6.7%

15.9%20.2% 22.8%

25.2%19.6%

23.8%28.7%

20.6%

25.6%

16.9%14.1% 10.3% 3.5%

25.5%21.4%

17.2%28.2%

24.4%

5.7%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006



38.2%

51.7%

55.5%

38.6%40.3%

51.7%

The percentage of English Language Learner cohort members earning a Local, Regents or

Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma

Cohort Membership

2005 11,265

2006 11,635

2007 12,236

2008 11,986

34.3%

51.6%

56.7%


22/109

2222

The Graduation Rate for Students with Disabilities

3.0% 3.1% 3.1% 3.0% 3.2% 3.1% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2%

19.1% 20.2%21.3% 22.8% 21.2% 21.4% 23.2% 21.7% 22.2%

20.0%20.8% 20.2%

18.9%26.1% 25.6%

25.6% 27.8% 27.9%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006



44.6%

50.1%

52.7%

42.1%44.1%

50.4%

The percentage of cohort members who are Students with Disabilities earning a Local, Regents or


Cohort Membership

2005 32,058

2006 32,696

2007 32,917

2008 33,833

44.7%

52.1%53.3%


23/109

232323

57.2% 64

.7%

43.3

%

47.2

% 56.0%

Charters

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents

with Advanced Designation diploma After 4 Years

Results Through June, All Students

The Graduation Rate for Charter Schools

These rates are based on small cohort

sizes. The student count of the charter

schools cohort has increased to 1,628 for

2008 cohort.


24/109

242424

64.7

%

7.9

% 12.7

%

Charter Schools

Graduation Rate Regents with Adv Designation ELA/Math APM

All Students After 4 Years


Aspirational Performance Measures (APMs) as a percentage of the

cohort compared to the Graduation Rate percentage for students

who started 9th grade in 2008 for Charter Schools

There are only 1,628

students in the

Charter School

cohort.


25/109

25

Statewide Achievement Gap Data


26/109

2626

Graduation rates by credential awarded, All Public Schools

10% 12%

43%

10% 12%

43%

9%12%

42%

34%33%

34%

39%37%

36%

45%42%

40%

14% 12%

7%

10% 9%

6%

4% 3%

4%

Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White


2006 2007 2008

57.7% 58.4%

85.1%

57.3%

84.1%

58.0%

the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diplomawith

Advanced Designation, selected racial ethnic groups after 4 years

The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.

58.1% 57.8%

85.7%


27/109

2727

Big 4 District graduation rates by credential awarded

3% 5%

13%

5%8%

18%

4% 6%

15%

25%27%

32%

31%

32%

36%

37%

41%

42%17% 17%

12%

12%

13%

10%

5%

4%

4%



2006 2007 2008

45.6%48.3%

63.5%

48.1%

57.1%

52.9%




45.9%

50.2%

61.6%


28/109

2828

Buffalo graduation rates by credential awarded

1% 1%

9%5%

9%

19%

4% 3%

15%

27% 26%

37%

35%23%

35%

36%

29%

43%17%

12%

13%

12%

11%

9%

5%

4%

4%



2006 2007 2008

44.6%

52.4%

64.0%

39.6%

58.3%

43.7%




44.1%

35.1%

62.7%


29/109

2929

Rochester graduation rates by credential awarded

5% 5%

19%

4% 5%

15%

5% 4%

18%

25% 24%

26%

30% 29%

37%

34%31%

36%15%

13%

11%

10% 11%

6%

5%

3%

4%



2006 2007 2008

45.0% 43.9%

58.5%

42.4%

56.1%

43.9%




43.4%

38.1%

57.8%


30/109

3030

Syracuse graduation rates by credential awarded

4% 4%

15%

4% 6%

13%

3%7%

13%

21%

15%

25%

27%19%

33%

36%

35%

38%

20%

14%

11%

16%

9%

11%

7% 4%

3%



2006 2007 2008

44.3%46.7%

57.1%

32.3%

51.6%

34.3%




46.4% 45.5%

53.7%


31/109

3131

Yonkers graduation rates by credential awarded

5% 7%

14%

7% 9%

22%

4%8%

17%

30%33%

42%

34%

40%

44%

50%

54%

54%23%

22%

13%

15%

16%

11%

6%

4%

5%



2006 2007 2008

58.6% 56.0%

77.6%

62.1%

70.0%65.5%



59.3%

65.0%

75.1%

G G


32/109

3232

27

33

3

-8

28

31

5

-7

26

34

0

-7

27

1

-6

27

34

-3-4

27

31

-1-3

28

33

-5

-1

28 30

-3

0

32

Graduation

Rate

Regents Adv

Designation

Regents

Diploma

Local

Diploma

Graduation

Rate

Regents Adv

Designation

Regents

Diploma

Local

Diploma

2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort

The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap

Black v. White Hispanic v. White

Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students

Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students


33/109

3333

20

25

1

-6

22

23

4

-6

20

24

1

-5

22

23

3

-4

20

25

-1

-4

22

23

1

-3

20

25

-4

-1

22

23

0 0

Graduation

Rate

Regents

Adv Desig

Regents

Diploma

Local

Diploma

Graduation

Rate

Regents

Adv Desig

Regents

Diploma

Local

Diploma


The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Studentscompared to White Students in New York City




The graduation rate and credentials earned achievement gap in New York City is generally

similar to the statewide trend.


34/109

3434

911

3

-5

18

10

-4

14

7

10

-4

19

8

1

1214

0

-3

20

10

-2

19

12

8

-1

28

12

15

1

1110

12

Graduation

Rate

Regents

Adv Desig

Regents

Diploma

Local

Diploma

Graduation

Rate

Regents

Adv Desig

Regents

Diploma

Local

Diploma


The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Studentscompared to White Students in Buffalo City School District




As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced

Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma.


35/109

3535

9

14

6

-10

11

13

4

11

14

1

-4

14 14

2

15

11

7

-3

15

11

8

1413

2

0

20

14

5

1

-5

-2

-4

Graduation

Rate

Regents Adv

Desig

Regents

Diploma

Local Diploma Graduation

Rate

Regents Adv

Desig

Regents

Diploma

Local Diploma


The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Studentscompared to White Students in Rochester City School

District







36/109

3636

8

13

9

-14

23

15

12

7

11

4

-8

19

111010 10

6

-5

23

8

14

7

10

2

-4

86

3

-1

-4

-2

2

Graduation

Rate

Regents Adv

Desig

Regents

Diploma


Rate

Regents Adv

Desig

Regents

Diploma

Local Diploma


The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Studentscompared to White Students in Syracuse City School

District







37/109

3737

16

6

12

-2

13

6

9

-2

11

9

12

-10

8 89

-9

22

16

10

-4

1213

4

-5

16

12

4

-1

109

0

1

Graduation

Rate

Regents Adv

Desig

Regents

Diploma


Rate

Regents Adv

Desig

Regents

Diploma

Local Diploma


The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Studentscompared to White Students in Yonkers City School District







38/109

3838

20

12

9 98

27

20

11

14

11

7

11

26

20

15

12

15

10

22

27

20

16

19

14

7

16

28

16

NYC Big 4* Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public


The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap between Blackand White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide

Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Graduating

after Four Years(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students)

Big 4* = Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers combined.


39/109

3939

22

10

18

11

23

28

22

9

19

14

19

8

27

22

11

20

15

23

12

27

22

11

28

20

8

10

28

13

NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public


Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Graduating

after Four Years(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)

The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap between Hispanicand White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide


40/109

4040

25

11 11

1413

33

24

9

7

14

119

34

25

1314

1110

16

34

25

1112

13

1012

33

6



Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a

Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation after Four Years(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students)

Regents with Advanced Designation Diplomas - the gapsbetween Black and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and

Statewide


41/109

4141

23

10 10

1315

31

23

8 8

14

11

8

32

23

10 1011

8

13

31

23

9

1214

6

9

30

6




Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation after Four Years(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)

Regents with Advanced Designation Diplomas - the gapsbetween Hispanic and White students for NYC, the Big 4,

and Statewide

R Di l h b Bl k d Whi


42/109

4242

1

9

3

6

9

3

1

7

10

1

4

12

0

-1

5

0

76

10

-3-4

6

8

2 2

4

-5

12




Regents Diploma after Four Years(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students)

Regents Diplomas - the gap between Black and Whitestudents for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide

R t Di l th b t Hi i d Whit


43/109

4343

4

7

11

4

12

2

3

5

10

2

109

11

4

12

8

14

4

-1

0

2

15

5

3

0

-2

9




Regents Diploma after Four Years(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)

Regents Diplomas - the gaps between Hispanic and Whitestudents for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide.

Wh i L l Di l th b t Bl k


44/109

4444

6

8

5

10

14

8

5 54 4

8

10

7

43 3 3

54 4

-1 -1 -1

0

-4

-1 -1

2




Local Diploma after Four Years(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was higher than for White Students)

When comparing Local Diplomas, the gap between Blackand White students in NYC and the Big 4 are smaller than

the gap found Statewide.

Wh i L l Di l th b t


45/109

4545

6

7

4

5

4

7

4 4

-1

2 2

9

6

3

4

2

4

-2

5

3

0

1 1 1

-1

1

0

2




Local Diploma after Four Years(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was higher than for White Students

Negative values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)

When comparing Local Diplomas, the gap betweenHispanic and White students in the Big 5 are smaller than

the gap found Statewide.


46/109

4646

3533 33

36

40

ELL


Achievement Gap in Percentage Between English Language

Learners and All Students Graduating with Regents or Local

Diploma After Four Years

Percentage Point Difference for Graduates in the Cohortsthrough June


47/109

4747

2930 29 29 29

SWD


Achievement Gap in Percentage Between Students with

Disabilities and All Students Graduating with Regents or Local

Diploma After Four Years

Percentage Point Difference for Graduates in the Cohortsthrough June


48/109

48

NYC and Big Four* City School

Districts

*2006 and 2007 5-year and 2007 and 2008 4-year

cohorts include students enrolled for at least one

day in a school or the district

P t f NYC d L Cit Di t i t St d t


49/109

4949

50

.3%

70.9

%

61.0

%

5

2.8

%

74.0

%

60.4

%

50

.0%

5

2.8

%

71.8

%

48.2%5

6.4

%

73.4

%

49.0

%59.0

%

74.0

%

New York City Large City Districts* Total Public


Percentage of NYCs and Large City Districts Students

Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4 Years

Results of Graduates in the Cohorts through June

* Large City Districts include: Buffalo,

Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers

Percentage of NYC and Big Four Cities Students


50/109

5050

51.8

%

48.4

%

4

7.3

%

58.1

%

60.9

%

54.0

%

45

.5%

48.4

%

66.2

% 74.0

%

60.4

%

46.8

%

4

8.0

%

66.0

%70.9

%

56.4

%

59.0

%

53.1

%

42.1

%45.2

%

58.1

%

71.8

%

61.0

%

4

7.4

%

46

.1%

45

.9%

63.2

%

73.4

%

43.4%

74.0

%

New York City Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public



Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years

Results of Graduates in the Cohorts through June



51/109

5151

60.4%

46.8%48.0%

47.8%48.6%

51.1%

72.1%

76.7%

66.0%

43.4%

74.0%

64.7%

New York City Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public

2008 Cohort 2008 Cohort August


Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years

Results of Graduates in the 2008 Cohort

through June and August

Buffalo City School District the percentage of cohort members earning a Local Regents or


52/109

5252

7.0%3.2%

9.5%6.2% 7.0%

3.1%

9.5%7.0%

3.2%

35.6%

29.3%

33.5%36.2%

39.6%

31.2%

35.5% 40.1%

31.5%

10.5%

14.9%

11.1%

4.4%

15.1%

17.8%

13.0%

15.5%

18.4%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006



54.0%52.1%

62.6%

53.1%

47.4%

61.7%

Buffalo City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or


Cohort Membership

2005 2,248

2006 3,479

2007 2,653

2008 2,948

46.8%

58.0%

53.0%

* 2006 and 2007 5-year and 2007and 2008 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district

R h t Cit S h l Di t i t th t f h t b i L l R t


53/109

5353

5.8% 6.8% 5.8% 6.1% 5.8% 6.9% 6.0% 5.8% 7.0%

19.5%

24.9%30.1%

33.2%

21.4%

28.2%34.2%

22.1%

29.6%

16.8%

14.4%9.6% 4.1%

23.4%

19.5%13.8%

25.7%

21.5%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006



45.5%

54.7% 53.6%

42.1%

46.1%

50.6%

Rochester City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or


Cohort Membership

2005 2,924

2006 2,670

2007 2,873

2008 2,564

43.4%

54.0% 58.0%

* 2006 and 2007 5-year and 2007 and 2008 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district


54/109

5454

7.8% 7.5% 7.5% 7.2% 8.1% 7.5% 7.7% 8.3% 7.7%

21.5% 22.3%

27.8%

35.6%

24.0% 23.7%

30.6%

24.4% 24.2%

15.9% 16.1%

13.2%

5.2%22.1% 22.7%

18.1%

23.6% 24.0%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006



48.4%

53.9%56.3%

45.2% 45.9%

54.2%

Syracuse City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or


Cohort Membership

2005 1,528

2006 1,571

2007 1,673

2008 1,547

48.0%

56.4% 55.9%

* 2006 5-year and 2007 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district

Yonkers City School District the percentage of cohort members earning a Local Regents or


55/109

5555

6.7% 8.2%12.4%

8.9% 6.7% 8.2%12.5%

6.7% 8.2%

31.7%34.7%

39.3%53.0%

34.3%36.1%

42.9%

34.4%36.1%

19.7%

20.3%

14.4%

4.2%

25.6%

26.8%

19.0%

26.8%

27.9%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006



66.2%

71.2%

68.0%

58.1%

63.2%66.7%

Yonkers City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or


Cohort Membership

2005 2,072

2006 1,673

2007 1,858

2008 1,814

66.0%

74.4%72.2%

* 2006 and 2007 5-year and 2007 and 2008 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district


56/109

Graduation Rates by

Need/Resource Group

For Four, Five and Six

Years


57/109

5757

New York City

69.2

%

67.8

%

70.9

0%

6

1.0

%69.4

%

73.2

%

6

0.9

% 70.2

%

60.4

%

56.4

% 66.1

%

59

.0%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort

Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years


Cohort Membership

2004 75,009

2005 77,378

2006 78,346

2007 79,476

2008 79,719


58/109

5858

Large City Districts

59.0

%

5

6.7

%

58.6

%

49.0

%

5

6.5

%

58.3

%

52.8

%59.8

%

50.0

%

5

7.2

%

50.3

%

48.2

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6

Years Results Through June

Cohort Membership

2004 8,863

2005 8,983

2006 9,536

2007 9,057

2008 8,873


59/109

5959

High Need Urban-Suburban Districts

72.1

%

71.7

%

72.9

%

64.5

%72.0

%

73.6

%

64.5

%72.3

%

65.1

%70.5

%

61.7

%

6

3.0

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort



Cohort Membership

2004 16,739

2005 16,964

2006 16,666

2007 16,517

2008 16,037


60/109

6060

High Need Rural Districts

78.0

%

78.8

%

79.3

%

75.4

%

79.5

%

79.0

%

76.1

%

80.3

%

77.4

%

77.5

%

73.3

%

74.2

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort



Cohort Membership

2004 14,898

2005 14,758

2006 14,262

2007 14,135

2008 13,501


61/109

6161

Average Need Districts

85.8

%

86.1

%

83.0

%

87.1

%

87.6

%

84.4

%

88.1

%

84.8

%

85.3

%

80.4

%86.5

%

81.0

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort



Cohort Membership

2004 73,488

2005 72,316

2006 71,230

2007 69,517

2008 68,042


62/109

6262

Low Need Districts

95.1

%

95.1

%

95.5

%

93.3

%

95.4

%

95.9

%

93

.5%

95

.7%

93.9

%

94.8

%

92.1

%

92.1

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort



Cohort Membership

2004 33,930

2005 33,616

2006 33,693

2007 33,468

2008 33,566


63/109

6363

Districts Outside New York City

83.9

%

83.8

%

84.5

%

80.1

%

84.4

%

85.1

%

81.2

%

85.4

%

81.6

%

78.2

%83.2

%

78.6

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort



Cohort Membership

2004 148,717

2005 147,444

2006 146,398

2007 143,809

2008 141,647

I th di t i t t id f NYC 81 6% f t d t


64/109

6464

IEP Diploma, 1.2%Still Enrolled, 9.3%

Transferred to GED

Program, 1.0%

Dropped Out, 6.7%

Graduated, 81.6%

In the districts outside of NYC,81.6% of students

who started 9th grade in 2008 graduated by June

2012, while 9.3% of students were still enrolled.

2008 Total Cohort

Students = 141,647All Students in

Public Schools

outside of NYC


65/109

65

Results for Studentsby

Race/Ethnicity and Gender

65

Cohort Memberships by Race/Ethnicity and Gender


66/109

66

p y y

2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 Cohorts

All Students2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

American Indian / Alaskan

Native Female

428 507 505 570 559

American Indian / Alaskan

Native Male

473 473 573 558 577

Asian Female 7573 7757 7900 8185 8,735

Asian Male 8279 8305 8584 9129 9,498

Black Female 21375 22004 22369 21860 21,374

Black Male 21215 21833 22246 22212 21,608

Hispanic Female 20068 20881 21509 22374 22,490

Hispanic Male 20430 21754 21840 23081 23,847

White Female 60015 58874 57465 55335 54,381

White Male 63545 62029 61279 59396 57,467


67/109

6767

Graduation Rate by Race/Ethnicity

56.5

%

78.4

%

54.2

%

52.2

%

82.0

%

70.9

%

56.3

%

80.4

%

55.7

%

54.8

%

82.7

%

71

.8%

59.1

%

82.6

%

57.7

%

57.3

%

84.1

%

73.4

%

59.6

%

82.4

%

58.4

%

58.0

%

85.1

%

7

4.0

%

58.5

%

81.6

%

58.1

%

57.8

%

85.7

%

7

4.0

%

American Indian /

Alaska Native

Asian Black Hispanic White All Students


Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four YearsThrough June


68/109

6868

Graduation Rate by Race/Ethnicity

58.5

%

81.6

%

58.1

%

57.8

%

85.7

%

7

4.0

%

61.7

%

84.1

%

62.6

%

62.3

%

87.1

%

76.7

%

American Indian /

Alaska Native


2008 Cohort 2008 Cohort Through August

Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma in the 2008Cohort After Four Years Through Juneand August

h


69/109

6969

IEP Diploma, 2.4%


Transferred to GED

Program, 1.5%

Dropped Out, 13.5%

Graduated, 58.5%

American Indian Students Who Started 9th Grade

in 2008, Results After Four YearsJune 2012

2008 Total Cohort

Students = 1,136

A i St d t Wh St t d 9th G d i 2008


70/109

7070

Asian Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008,

Results After Four YearsJune 2012

2008 Total Cohort

Students = 18,233

IEP Diploma, 0.4%

Graduated, 81.6%

Dropped Out, 5.1%


Transferred to GED

Program, 0.2%

S S th G


71/109

7171

IEP Diploma, 1.9%


Transferred to GED

Program, 1.2%

Dropped Out, 12.6%

Graduated, 58.1%

Black Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008,


2008 Total Cohort

Students = 42,982

Hi i S d Wh S d 9th G d i 2008


72/109

7272

IEP Diploma, 1.5%


Transferred to GED

Program, 1.1%

Dropped Out, 13.6%

Graduated, 57.8%

Hispanic Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008,


2008 Total Cohort

Students = 46,337

Whit St d t Wh St t d 9th G d i 2008


73/109

7373

IEP Diploma, 1.1%


Transferred to GED

Program, 1.0%

Dropped Out, 5.2%

Graduated, 85.7%

White Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008,


2008 Total Cohort

Students = 111,848


74/109

7474

Graduation Rate by Gender and Race/Ethnicity

83.9

%

61.3

%

58.1

%

85.5

%

75.5

%

61.7

%

85.2

%

61.9

%

60.9

%

86.3

%

76.4

%

64.6

%

87.0

%

64.0

%

63.0

%

87.4

%

77.7

%

62.3

%

86.7

%

64.3

%

63.2

%

88.2

%

78.0

%

62.4

%

85.6

%

63.8

%

62.1

%

88.7

%

77.8

%

49.5%

73.5

%

47.0

%

46.4

%

78.7

%

66.5

%

50.5%

76.0

%

49.4%

49.1

%

79.3

%

67.4

%

54.3

%

78.5

%

51.2

%

51.7%

81.1

%

69.4

%

56.8

%

78.6

%

52.6

%

53.0%

82.3

%

70.2

%

54.6

%

78.0

%

52.6

%

53.7%

82.8

%

70.3

%

64.3

%

American Indian /

Alaska Native


Females 2004 Cohort Females 2005 Cohort Females 2006 Cohort Females 2007 Cohort Females 2008 Cohort

Males 2004 Cohort Males 2005 Cohort Males 2006 Cohort Males 2007 Cohort Males 2008 Cohort

Percentage of Students Graduating w ith Regents or Local Diplom a After Four Years Throu gh J une

Solid colors: Females

Stripes: Males

G 2012 2012


75/109

75

Graduation rates through August 2012 vs. June 2012.

85.6%

53.7%

62.4%

65.5%

54.6%

58.1%

87.7%

78.0%

80.8%

63.8%

68.2%

52.6% 57

.1% 62

.1% 66

.6%

58.1%

88.7%

89.8%

82.8%

84.6%

Percentage of Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008 and Gradu ated with Regent s

or Lo cal Diploma After Four Years through Jun e and Au gus t 2012

AsianAmerican

Indian /

Alaska

NativeHispanicBlack

White

Solid colors: Females

Stripes: Males

Blue August 2012Red June 2012

Cohort Graduation Rates After Four Five


76/109

7676

Cohort Graduation Rates After Four, Five,

and Six Years for American Indian Students.

64.9

%

65.6

%

67.1

%

59.1

%64.0

%

65.7

%

59

.6% 6

7.2

%

58.5

%

56.5

%

6

3.2

%

56.3

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort



Cohort Membership

2004 980

2006 1,078

2007 1,128

2008 1,136

Cohort Graduation Rates After Four Five


77/109

7777


and Six Years Results for Asian Students.

87.2

%

87.1

%

88.6

%

87.9

%

89.7

%

82.4

%

81.6

%

85.6

%

78.4

%

80.4

%

82.6

%88.1

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort



Cohort Membership

2004 15,852

2005 16,062

2006 16,484

2007 17,314

2008 18,233



78/109

7878

, ,

and Six Years Results for White Students

86.4

%

86.6

%

87.1

%

84.1

%

87.5

%

87.9

%

85.1

%

88.3

%

82.0

%

85.9

%

82.7

%

85.7

%


2004 Cohort

2005 Cohort

2006 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort



Cohort Membership

2004 123,560

2005 120,903

2006 118,744

2007 114,731

2008 111,848


79/109

79

Results

forStudents with Disabilities

79

44 7% of students with disabilities statewide


80/109

8080

IEP Diploma, 8.2%


Transferred to GED

Program, 1.7%

Dropped Out, 15.6%

Graduated, 44.7%

44.7% of students with disabilities statewide

who started 9th grade in 2008 graduated by

June 2012, while 29.5% were still enrolled.

2008 Total Cohort

Students = 33,833

Four-year graduation rates for students


81/109

8181

26.3

% 35.1

%

36.9

%

51.8

%

41.5

%46.2%

44.7

%

75.0

%

22.5

%

24.7

%

23.0

%

36.9

%

38.8

%

53

.0%

42.1

%

73.8

%

27.9

%

25.0

%

39.4

%

40.7

%

55.8

%

75.3

%

44.1

%

27.2

%

28.2

%39.0

% 46.2%

57.0

%

75.6

%

44.6

%

58.8

%

25.8

%

27.6

%

40.4

%

74.8

%


Suburban



Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma

After Four Years Through June

with disabilities by Need/Resource

Capacity


82/109

82

Results for English

Language Learners

82

Statewide, 34.3% of ELL students who started

9th d i 2008 h d d t d b J 2012


83/109

8383

IEP Diploma, 2.4%


Transferred to GED

Program, 1.1%

Dropped Out, 21.3%

Graduated, 34.3%

9th grade in 2008 had graduated by June 2012,

while 40.7% were still enrolled and 21.3% had

dropped out.

2008 Total Cohort

Students = 11,986

Graduation rates for ELL students


84/109

8484

42.1

%

26.8

% 35.0

%

34.3

%

35.7

%

37.9

%

21.0

%

31.6

%

5

3.9

%

35.8

%40%

30%

30% 3

5%

35% 3

9%

52

%

41.5

%

24.3

%34.4

% 40.3

%

36.9

%

55.8

%

40.3

%

39.4

%

26.2

%30.4

%34.5

%38.6

%

5

3.5

%

38.2

%

20.7

%

35.4

%

28.9

%

47.7%


Suburban



Cohort Membership

2004 10,846

2005 11,265

2006 11,635

2007 12,236

2008 11,986

Graduation rates of ELLs compared to non-ELLs.


85/109

8585

Graduation rates of ELLs compared to non ELLs.

34.3%

76.2%

English Language Learners Non-English Language Learners

Percentage of students who started 9th grade in 2008 who graduated by June 2012

2008 Cohort Membership

English Language Learners 11,986

Non-English Language learners 209,380


86/109

86

Credentials Earned

By Those Who Graduated:

Regents Diplomasvs.

Local Diplomas

86

2008 Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June 2012 By

Racial/Ethnic Group and Gender.


87/109

8787

Racial/Ethnic Group and Gender.

Credent ials Earned b y Students Who Graduated

All Students

5.4% 8.3% 0.9%5.9% 9.6% 4.5% 7.1% 3.8% 5.1%

71.3%72.1%

35.7%39.7%

76.5%77.5%

73.9% 72.8%

43.8%48.7%

23.2% 19.7%

63.4%58.6%

17.6% 12.9% 21.6% 20.0%

52.4%46.2%

1.6%

American

Indian /

Alaska

Native

Female

American

Indian /

Alaska

Native Male

Asian

Female

Asian Male Black

Female

Black Male Hispanic

Female

Hispanic

Male

White

Female

White Male

Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation

349 315 7,475 7,405 13,631 11,356 13,977 12,811 48,263 47,570Graduate

Count:

Total Cohort Graduation Rate


88/109

8888


Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated

American Indian/ Alaska Native Students and All Students

24.0%19.2% 15.3% 16.1%

5.4%

19.2% 19.2% 17.7%

14.5% 8.3%16.5%

14.7% 10.2%

46.2% 55.0%55.2%

59.2%71.3%

54.3%61.1%

58.2%60.6% 72.1%

38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 47.3%53.6%

41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 55.9%

29.8%25.9%

29.4%24.8% 24.9%

19.7%

44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1%40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%

5.8%12.6% 9.4%

4.0%

15.9% 12.6%

14.3%

24.1%

19.7%23.2% 26.5%

AI/ANFemale2004

AI/ANFemale2005

AI/ANFemale2006

AI/ANFemale2007

AI/ANFemale2008

AI/ANMale2004

AI/ANMale2005

AI/ANMale2006

AI/ANMale2007

AI/ANMale2008

AllFemale2004

AllFemale2005

AllFemale2006

AllFemale2007

AllFemale2008

AllMales2004

AllMales2005

AllMale2006

AllMale2007

AllMale2008


Total Cohort Graduation RateAfter Four Years Through June


89/109

8989

g


Asian Students and All Students

9.3% 8.4% 6.1%

16.5% 14.7%10.2%

5.8%

26.9% 28.6% 31.0%31.2% 35.7%

29.7% 31.7% 33.4% 36.7%39.7%

38.9% 42.1% 43.9%47.3%

53.6%

41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 55.9%

63.8% 63.0% 62.9%64.3% 63.4% 60.7%59.3% 60.1% 58.1% 58.6%

44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1%40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%

5.2%6.5%9.7%

4.6%

9.0%

1.6%0.9%

12.6%9.4%

4.0%

15.9% 12.6%14.3%

AsainFemales2004

AsainFemales2005

AsianFemales2006

AsianFemales2007

AsianFemales2008

AsianMales2004

AsianMales2005

AsianMales2006

AsianMales2007

AsianMales2008

AllFemale2004

AllFemale2005

AllFemales2006

AllFemales2007

AllFemales2008

AllMales2004

AllMales2005

AllMales2006

AllMales2007

AllMales2008




90/109

9090

g


Black Students and All Students

32.5%27.2%

23.5%

15.9%

5.9%

34.5%29.1% 25.6%

18.5%9.6%

16.5% 14.7%10.2%

5.8%

48.9%

55.4% 58.0%66.1%

76.5%

49.6%55.5% 60.3%

67.2%77.5%

38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 47.3%53.6%

41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5%55.9%

18.6% 17.5% 18.4% 18.0% 17.6% 15.9% 15.4%14.1% 14.3% 12.9%

44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1%40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%

14.3% 12.6%15.9%

4.0%9.4%

12.6%

BlackFemales2004

BlackFemales2005

BlackFemales2006

BlackFemales2007

BlackFemales2008

BlackMales2004

BlackMales2005

BlackMales2006

BlackMales2007

BlackMales2008

AllFemale2004

AllFemale2005

AllFemales2006

AllFemales2007

AllFemales2008

AllMales2004

AllMales2005

AllMales2006

AllMales2007

AllMales2008




91/109

9191



Hispanic Students and All Students

31.8%27.9%

22.1%14.6%

4.5%

29.8%25.8%

21.2%15.7%

7.1%

16.5% 14.7%10.2%

5.8%

46.5% 51.6%

57.7%64.0%

73.9%

48.2% 53.5%58.2% 64.7%

72.8%

38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 47.3%53.6%

41.9%45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 55.9%

21.6% 20.5% 20.2% 21.4% 21.6% 22.0% 20.8% 20.5% 19.6% 20.0%

44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1%40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%

12.6%

9.4% 4.0%

15.9%12.6%14.3%

HispanicFemales2004

HispanicFemales2005

HispanicFemales2006

HispanicFemales2007

HispanicFemales2008

HispanicMales2004

HispanicMales2005

HispanicMales2006

HispanicMales2007

HispanicMales2008

AllFemale2004

AllFemale2005

AllFemales2006

AllFemales2007

AllFemales2008

AllMales2004

AllMales2005

AllMales2006

AllMales2007

AllMales2008




92/109

9292

g


White Students and All Students

9.8% 8.8% 7.8% 10.4% 9.2% 8.5%

16.5% 14.7%10.2%

5.8%

36.0% 37.8% 37.9% 39.3% 43.8%

40.6%43.1% 43.0% 44.9% 48.7%

38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 47.3%53.6%

41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5%55.9%

54.2% 53.3% 54.4% 54.1% 52.4%48.9% 47.7% 48.5% 47.6% 46.2%

44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1%40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%

5.1%7.5%3.8%6.6%12.6%

9.4%4.0%

15.9%12.6%14.3%

WhiteFem

ales2004

WhiteFem

ales2005

WhiteFem

ales2006

WhiteFem

ales2007

WhiteFem

ales2008

WhiteM

ales2004

WhiteM

ales2005

WhiteM

ales2006

WhiteM

ales2007

WhiteM

ales2008

AllFemale2004

AllFemale2005

AllFemales2006

AllFemales2007

AllFemales2008

AllMales2004

AllMales2005

AllMales2006

AllMales2007

AllMales2008


Diplomas Awarded to Students with Disabilitiesof Total Diplomas Awarded 2005-2008 Cohorts


93/109

9393

7.2% 7.0% 7.0%

41.8% 42.0% 41.4% 40.4%

45.3% 45.8% 47.8%

43.7% 45.4%48.8%

54.7%

47.5% 47.2% 45.2%

14.5% 12.6% 9.8%

4.9%

6.6%

51.1%

42.3%

Students with

Disabil ities 2005

Students with

Disabilities 2006

Students with

Disabil ities 2007

Students with

Disabil ities 2008

All Students

2005

All Students

2006

All Students

2007

All Students

2008


English Language Learners by Diploma Type


94/109

9494

g g g y yof Total Diplomas Awarded 2008 Cohort

16.4%

41.0% 40.4%

73.5%

54.2% 54.7%

10.1%4.7% 4.9%

ELL Non-ELL AllStudents


Percentage of Total Cohort Who Received a


95/109

9595

30.6

%

48.8

%

61.2%

72.6

%

59.4%

71.1

%80.7

%

70.4

%

84.1

%

40.9

%45%

33%

52%

64%

74%

61%

85%

49.2

%

33.2

%

53.3

%

65.4

%

76.6

%

87.0

%

6

4.2

%

53.0

%

41.1

%

56.3

%

67.0

%

78.7

%8

7.4

%

66.8

%

57.7%

45.6

%

60.6%

90.9

%

New York City Large City Urban-Suburban Rural Average Low Total Public


Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with

Advanced Designation after 4 Years by Need

Resource Group Through June

Percentage of Total Cohort Students with Disabilities Who


96/109

9696

7.6

%1

3.1

%16.5

%

27.6

%

20.6

%

20.5

%

35.2

%

48.9

%

7.0

%9%

7%

17%

17%

30%

22%

51%

11.1

%

7.7

%

16.7

%

18.4

%

31.4

%

51.6

%

23.3

%

12.4

%

9.4

%

17.6

%19.9

%

32.6%

53.4

%

24.4

%

14.1

%

7.8

%

25.8

%

18.6

%

55.4

%



Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with

Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June by

Need/Resource Capacity Category

Percentage of Total Cohort English Language Learners Who

R i d R t Di l R t Di l ith


97/109

9797

6.8%

18.4

%

21.1

% 26.9

%

18.5

%

18.8

%

28.6

% 35.5

%

17.7

%22%

13%

19% 2

2%

23%

22%

36%

26.9

%

10.8

%

22.8

%

22.5

%25.8

%

41.1

%

26.3

%29.3

%

15.4

% 21.3

%

19.0

%2

7.2

%

37.1

%

27.9

%

30.9

%

23.2

%32.0

%

25.6

%

4

5.1

%



Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with

Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June by

Need/Resource Capacity Category

Percentage of Total Cohort Students by Racial/Ethnic Group Who


98/109

9898

71.0

%

36.1

%

36.1

%

73.7

%

54.5

%

80.6

%

54.5

%

81.9

%

59.4

%

44.2

%

45.5%

73.4

%

40.1

%

40.1

%

75.3

%

61.4

%

49.4

%

77.4

%

43.5

%

44.9%

77.3

%

64.2

%

50

.4%

78.4

%

48.4%

49.3

%

79.1

%

66.8

%

53.7

%

70.4

%

American Indian /

Alaska Native



g y p

Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced

Designation After Four Years Through June

Percentage of Total Cohort American Indian/Alaska

Native Students by Gender Who Received a Regents


99/109

9999

40.0

%44.2%

63.0

%

55.8

%59.0

%

5

0.1

%

74.7

%

66.3

%

51.3

% 59.4

%

61.4

%

57.8

%65.2

%

45.5

%

40.8

%48

.8%

64.2

%

60.6

%67.9

%

49.4

%

44.7%

4

9.9

%

66.8

%

63.1

%70.7

%

5

0.4

%

48.6

%54.7

%

70.4

%

54.5

%

American Indian /

Alaska Native

Female

American Indian /

Alaska Native Male

American Indian /

Alaska Native Total

All Female All Male All Students


Native Students by Gender Who Received a Regents

Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced

Designation After Four Years Through June

Percentage of Total Cohort Asian Students by

Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents


100/109

100100

66.4

%71.0

%

63.0

%

55.8

%

84.8

%

76.7

%

74.7

%

66.3

%

76.0

%

59.4

%

61.4

%

57.8

%65.2

%73.4

%

69.1

%78.0

%

64.2

%

60.6

%67.9

%77.4

%

74.3

%81.7

%

66.8

%

63.1

%70.7

%78.4

%

74.6

%82.7

%

70.4

%

80.6

%

Asian Female Asian Male Asian Total All Female All Male All Students


Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents

Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years

Through June

Percentage of Total Cohort Black Students by

Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or


101/109

101101

30.8

% 36.1

%

63.0

%

55.8

%60.0

%

47.5%

41.3

%

59.4

%

61.4

%

57.8

%65.2

%

40.1

%

35.0

%

45.1%

64.2

%

60.6

%67.9

%

43.5

%

38.1

%

49

.0%

66.8

%

63.1

%70.7

%

48.4

%

42.8

%

54.1

%

66.3

%74.7

%

70.4

%

53.7

%

Black Female Black Male Black Total All Female All Male All Students

2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Total 2007 Total 2008 Total


Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation


Percentage of Total Cohort Hispanic Students by



102/109

102102

32.6

%36.1

%

63.0

%

55.8

%59.3

%

49.9

%

74.7

%

66.3

%

39.6

%

59.4

%

61.4

%

57.8

%65.2

%

40.1

%

36.4

%43.9

%

64.2

%

60.6

%67.9

%

44.9%

40.7

%49

.0%

66.8

%

63.1

%70.7

%

49.3

%

44.7%

54.0

%

70.4

%

54.5

%

Hispanic Female Hispanic Male Hispanic Total All Female All Male All Students



Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation


Percentage of Total Cohort White Students by



103/109

103103

70.5

%73.7

%

63.0

%

55.8

%

85.4

%

78.6

%

74.7

%

66.3

%

77.1

%

59.4

%

61.4

%

57

.8%6

5.2

%

75.3

%

72.0

%78.7

%

64.2

%

60.6

%67.9

%77.3

%

74.2

%80.6

%

66.8

%

63.1

%70.7

%79.1

%

76.1

%82.3

%

70.4

%

81.9

%

White Female White Male White Total All Female All Male All Students



Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After

Four Years Through June

Mathematics Regents ExaminationsImplementation / Transition Timeline

Approved by the Board of Regents 12/8/05


104/109

104

Mathematics

A

Mathematics

BAlgebra Geometry

Algebra 2/

Trigonometry

2006-07 X X

2007-08 X X

X

First admin. in

June 2008

2008-09

X

Last admin. in

January 2009

X X

X

First admin. in

June 2009

2009-10

X

Last admin. in

June 2010

X X

X

First admin. in

June 2010

2010-11 X X X

2011-12 X X X

.

Local Diploma Phase-Out* Timeline

Requirements for Students Entering Grade 9 in:


105/109

105

September

2002-04

September

2005

September

2006

September

2007

September

2008

September

2009

September

2010

September

2011

Regents

Examinationscore of 65+

0 2 3 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A

& Regents

Examination

score of 55-64

1-5 3 2 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Or, for

students withdisabilities:

Regents

Examination

score of 55-64

1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5

Regents

Competency

Tests

1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 N/A

.

* The local diploma option remains for general education students who pass three Regents examinations with a

score of 65 or above and two Regents examinations through an appeals process. In addition, students with

disabilities who first enter grade 9 in September 2005 or later and earn a Regents examination score between 55

and 64 continue to be eligible for a local diploma. Students with disabilities who first enter grade 9 no later than the

2010-11 school year, but fail any of the five required Regents examinations, may earn a local diploma by passing the

corresponding Regents Competency Test.

Graduation Rate Release:


106/109

106

2008 Coho rt through June/August 2012

Students excluded from a school/district cohort:

Transferred to a different New York public school,nonpublic school, or a school outside New York

Transferred to home-schooling

Transferred to a postsecondary school prior toearning a diploma

Transferred outside district by court order to aprogram that provide access to a regular high schooldiploma

Left the United StatesDeceased

Graduation Rate Release:


107/109

107

2008 Coho rt through June/August 2012

Graduation Rate equals the number of students inthe 2008 cohort who earned a Local, Regents, orRegents with Advanced Designation diploma dividedby the total number of students in the 2008 cohort

Students who earn GED or IEP diplomas cannot beincluded as graduates for graduation rate reportingpurposes*

* See federal guidance at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/hsgrguidance.pdf

Required Documentation for
http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/hsgrguidance.pdfhttp://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/hsgrguidance.pdf


108/109

108

Removal f rom the Cohort

Transfer:

Written request for a transcript from the receiving school, a record of sending a

transcript to the receiving school, written acknowledgement from the receiving

school that the student has registered, written notice of the intent to instruct at

home, copy of post-secondary admission notification and schedule of courses

taken, or a copy of the court order placing student out of district.

Left the United States:

Written statement from a parent or guardian indicating a destination or written

documentation from a school administrator of a conversation had with the students

parent indicating that the family is leaving the country, which the administrator

includes in the students file.

See federal guidance at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/hsgrguidance.pdf
http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/hsgrguidance.pdfhttp://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/hsgrguidance.pdf


109/109

Graduation Rates:Students Who Started 9th Grade

in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008

Supplemental Packet

Documents

Supplemental Grad Rate Slides