Upload
mike-murray
View
34
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A New Test Method to Measure the Freeze Thaw Durability of
Fresh Concrete
Braden Tabb, Robert Felice, John Michael Freeman, Robert Frazier, David Welchel
Tyler Ley, P.E., Ph. D
Acknowledgements
• Oklahoma Transportation Center • CP Tech Center • Portland Cement Association
Summary
• Some basics of air entrained concrete… • The Super Air Meter • The future
What is…
Concrete
PCA Photo
What is…
Air-entrained concrete
Why Do We Add Air to Concrete?
• Air-entrained bubbles are the key to the freeze-thaw resistance of concrete Air volume = Freeze Thaw Performance
• Smaller bubbles are more effective in providing freeze-thaw resistance than larger bubbles
• Volume of air provided is the same for both circumstances.
• Case B has a lower spacing factor and a higher specific surface.
A B
What Do You Want in an Air-Void System?
A B
• Volume of air provided is the same for both circumstances.
• Case B has a lower spacing factor and a higher specific surface.
What Do You Want in an Air-Void System?
Current Measuring Techniques
PCA photo
ASTM C 231 PCA photo
ASTM C 173 ASTM C 138
These only measure volume!!!
Hardened Air Void Analysis
From Hover
Hardened Air Void Analysis
From Hover
Open symbols failed ASTM C666
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.020
0.022
0.024
2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0%
Sp
acin
g F
acto
r (i
n)
Air Content of Concrete (Pressure)
No Polycarboxylate
Open symbols failed ASTM C666
Freeman et al., 2012
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.020
0.022
0.024
2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0%
Sp
acin
g F
acto
r (i
n)
Air Content of Concrete (Pressure)
No Polycarboxylate
Polycarboxylate
Open symbols failed ASTM C666
Freeman et al., 2012
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%0
- 10
10 -
2020
- 30
30 -
4040
- 50
50 -
6060
- 70
70 -
8080
- 90
90 -
100
100
- 110
110
- 120
120
- 130
130
- 140
140
- 150
150
- 160
160
- 170
170
- 180
180
- 190
190
- 200
200
- 210
210
- 220
220
- 230
230
- 240
240
- 250
250
- 260
260
- 270
270
- 280
280
- 290
290
- 300
300
- 310
310
- 320
320
- 330
330
- 340
340
- 350
350
- 360
360
- 370
370
- 380
380
- 390
390
- 400
400
- 410
410
- 420
420
- 430
430
- 440
440
- 450
450
- 460
460
- 470
470
- 480
480
- 490
490
- 500
500
- 550
550
- 600
600
- 650
650
- 700
700
- 750
750
- 800
800
- 850
850
- 900
900
- 950
950
- 100
010
00 -
1200
1200
- 14
0014
00 -
1600
1600
- 18
0018
00 -
2000
2000
+
norm
alize
d Ai
r Con
tent
Fra
ctio
n
Chord Size, microns
WROS OnlyPC1 + WROS
Freeman et al., 2012
small voids large voids
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%0
- 10
10 -
2020
- 30
30 -
4040
- 50
50 -
6060
- 70
70 -
8080
- 90
90 -
100
100
- 110
110
- 120
120
- 130
130
- 140
140
- 150
150
- 160
160
- 170
170
- 180
180
- 190
190
- 200
200
- 210
210
- 220
220
- 230
230
- 240
240
- 250
250
- 260
260
- 270
270
- 280
280
- 290
290
- 300
300
- 310
310
- 320
320
- 330
330
- 340
340
- 350
350
- 360
360
- 370
370
- 380
380
- 390
390
- 400
400
- 410
410
- 420
420
- 430
430
- 440
440
- 450
450
- 460
460
- 470
470
- 480
480
- 490
490
- 500
500
- 550
550
- 600
600
- 650
650
- 700
700
- 750
750
- 800
800
- 850
850
- 900
900
- 950
950
- 100
010
00 -
1200
1200
- 14
0014
00 -
1600
1600
- 18
0018
00 -
2000
2000
+
norm
alize
d Ai
r Con
tent
Fra
ctio
n
Chord Size, microns
WROS OnlyPC1 + WROS
Look at the difference in the volume of the air voids!!!
Freeman et al., 2012
small voids large voids
Summary • It is common to require a certain
volume of air in concrete in order to obtain freeze thaw durability
• The volume of air does not equal air void system quality
• Although, a hardened air void analysis (ASTM C 457) can measure the air-void quality it is not practical to run regularly
What do we need? • We need a test that can quantify air-
void systems quickly in fresh concrete • Investigate a sample of significant size • Economical • Field ready
Super Air Meter (SAM) • We have modified a typical ASTM C
231 pressure meter so that it can hold larger pressures
• We have replaced the typical gage with a digital one
• The test takes 8 minutes
digital gauge
Six clamps!
How does it work? • Use ASTM C 231 procedures to fill the
measurement bowl • Secure the lid • Add water through the petcocks
top chamber
bottom chamber
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
0
App
lied
Pres
sure
(psi
)
Time
Top Chamber, Pc1
Bottom Chamber, Pa1
Equilibrium Pressure, P2When both chambers are in contact with one another
Top Chamber
Bottom Chamber
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
0
App
lied
Pres
sure
(psi
)
Time
Top Chamber, Pc1
Bottom Chamber, Pa1
Equilibrium Pressure, P2When both chambers are in contact with one another
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
0
App
lied
Pres
sure
(psi
)
Time
Top Chamber, Pc1
Bottom Chamber, Pa1
Equilibrium Pressure, P2When both chambers are in contact with one another
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
0
App
lied
Pres
sure
(psi
)
Time
Top Chamber, Pc1
Bottom Chamber, Pa1
Equilibrium Pressure, P2When both chambers are in contact with one another
release pressure in both chambers
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
0
App
lied
Pres
sure
(psi
)
Time
Top Chamber, Pc1
Bottom Chamber, Pa1
Equilibrium Pressure, P2When both chambers are in contact with one another
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
0
App
lied
Pres
sure
(psi
)
Time
Top Chamber, Pc1
Bottom Chamber, Pa1
Equilibrium Pressure, P2
How does it work? • We use an algorithm to find a SAM
number. • The SAM number correlates to air
void distribution • The meter also measures air volume
How can we prove it? • We made 95 concrete mixtures • Different AEAs • Combinations of AEAs and PCs • Different w/cm (0.39 - 0.53) • Slumps from 0.25” to 10” • Air contents from 1.25% to 10% • Hardened air void analysis (ASTM C
457) was completed on each mixture • Values were compared to the SAM
number
ACI 201
PASS
FAIL
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Mod
ulus
(%)
SAM NumberSAM Number
PASS
FAIL
Observations • When the SAM number is below 0.2
then the spacing factor is below 0.008” for 90% of the samples and 98% of the samples had a spacing factor below 0.010”
• The SAM number seems to correlate with the amount of small bubbles in the sample
How Consistent Is It? • We ran the following on each of the 95
mixtures with two separate SAMs: – Air contents – SAM numbers – ASTM C 457 hardened air void analysis – Unit Weight
y = 1.015x - 0.0227R² = 0.9932
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
SAM
2 A
ir Co
nten
t (%
)
SAM 1 Air Content (%)
Mean Difference -0.005% Standard dev. 0.064%
Mean Difference 0.006 Standard dev. 0.049
y = 0.9982x + 0.2504
R² = 0.9668y = 0.9965x + 0.3611
R² = 0.9651
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Supe
r Air
(%)
Gravimetric Calculated Air (%)
Conclusions • The SAM test can be completed in
about 10 minutes with fresh concrete • A SAM number of 0.20 seems to
correlate with the ASTM C 457 spacing factor of 0.008” and freeze thaw durability as per ASTM C 666
• Two SAMs have been shown to provide consistent results.
www.superairmeter.com
SAMs should be available April 2014
Questions???